This one confuses me, and I really wish it could be answered once and for all.

I still believe that it's the tone of the Red Pill sub that irks you guys off, but because many of you will disagree, I'd like to find out why exactly you disagree with that.

Many of you guys on TBP will claim that the beliefs about women are false, but that the actionable advice is stuff you can get anywhere else without the "misogyny". To me, misogyny equates to the tone. When you guys claim TRP to be misogynistic, you are attacking the tone of the sub.

How about the methodology? The sexual strategy stuff? Many of you will claim it to be fine without the misogyny, but then also claim TRP will only be effective on a tiny, small, insignificant, subset of women.

Working out, flirting, holding frame, passing shit tests, dread game, amused mastery, agree & amplify, are all normal parts of the male and female experience. If we worded certain things differently, you would agree with it. Which is why I STILL am not sold that you have a problem with the content.

Dread Game, for example, if worded differently, would be agreed upon by most people. (Women get jealous. This is no secret. People want what they can't have. A woman who has been in a relationship with a guy for a long time is going to want to keep him around. If she see's that other women are interested, then she isn't just going to let that happen unless she really doesn't care about the relationship anymore. She's going to work to keep him.)

Passing shit tests really, if worded differently, just means flirting. Plain and simple. It's not a bad thing to shit test, ladies. That opens us up for an opportunity to flirt, which means...

Amused mastery/agree & amplify if worded differently, are flirting techniques. (These are how you pass shit tests).

So, is it the tone, or is it the methodology that you guys reject? Evidence still tells me its the tone.