The Andrew Tate phenomenon shows that the mainstream responds very positively to "pill" ideas, but they are artificially suppressed by Western media companies

Andrew Tate is a red-pill type guy who has been blowing up in the last 6 months mainly off of TikTok. Right now the hashtag Andrew Tate has over 10 billion views on TikTok. According to Google trends, he is also one of the most searched people in the world right now, with his search volume exceeding that of people like Kim Kardashian.

The thing is though, Andrew Tate isn't a new kid on the block. He's been milling around for close to 10 years on Twitter, YouTube and Instagram where he was constantly banned and suppressed by the gynocentric, left-leaning Western media platforms. No surprise that when this super charismatic guy was given a fair shake by a Chinese platform with no stake in the Western culture wars, he blew up globally and became the most talked about person on the whole platform.

This artificial suppression is very frequent if you follow the manosphere. I have personally witnessed the same thing happen to Kevin Samuels, Wheat Waffles, Tails BP, AMS, Gonzalo Lira, Alexander Grace, the trp sub , the inc3l sub and the MGT0W sub. They were all blowing up fast and all their growth came to a screeching halt because some moderators from the gynocentric, radical-left Silicon Valley didn't like the idea of androcentric, male-focused content going viral, even though their unbiased algorithms are showing that there is clearly a demand for it.

This artificially makes the "pills" seem like cultish online backwaters when in reality they are ideas that are logical and palatable to the mainstream if given a fair shake by the media.