~ archived since 2018 ~

TRP behavior and modern women behavior are mirror images of each other

July 11, 2022
47 upvotes

TRP-ers are basically behaving just like modern women.

The biggest difference is that "Sex and the City" is accepted even celebrated, while TRP is shunned and lives on the edge of the human society. Everything else is mirrored. People talk shit about TRP creators making money of their content, and "Sex and the City" creators which make money of their content are celebrities... and yes both of them create drama to earn more money.

If you think that modern women behavior is right because it is celebrated, and TRP behavior is wrong because it is shunned, well think about the behaviors which were celebrated and shunned just 100 years ago. Were those right and wrong?

And here comes the answer to the question PPD women often ask, why are men so disgusted by their AF/BB behavior. Because it's the same thing as male TRP behavior which makes women so disgusted.

Women fuck with fun guys, try to trap Chads and once they are used up they are willing to settle for some Beta Buck.

Men fuck with fun girls, they fuck women below their league which want to trap them, and then they are willing to settle with some homewife material.

It's the same shit, just mirrored.

Women don't like men playing the numbers game, yet when women swipe left 90% of the profiles on Tinder they are playing the numbers game. When they sleep with a bunch of guys before settling they are playing the numbers game.

Women don't like that men which don't really like them are willing to sleep with them, well men don't like that women which don't really want to have sex with them are willing to settle with them.

The list of these mirrored behaviors is huge.

This is a Change My View post, replies must challenge my view, affirmative replies should be posted under the automoderator. I will block every user which resorts to shaming.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/PurplePillDebate.

/r/PurplePillDebate archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Title TRP behavior and modern women behavior are mirror images of each other
Author smallstarseeker
Upvotes 47
Comments 134
Date July 11, 2022 1:03 PM UTC (8 months ago)
Subreddit /r/PurplePillDebate
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/PurplePillDebate/trp-behavior-and-modern-women-behavior-are-mirror.1123167
https://theredarchive.com/post/1123167
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/vwhy1k/trp_behavior_and_modern_women_behavior_are_mirror/
Comments

[–]wtknight[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (3 children) | Copy Link

I will block every user which resorts to shaming.

Do not block other users. Please report any comments that break sub rules to the moderators.

[–]sarkington 44 points45 points  (66 children) | Copy Link

FDS and TRP are the counterparts — both are deliberate strategies to get what you want in a world you perceive as hostile to your goals.

And they’re not wrong, because both goals are selfish, like all dating, but to the extreme. This is because the strategies cater to the bitter, unsuccessful, damaged and struggling

[–]cuckedalt 6 points7 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

selfish, like all dating, but to the extreme. This is because the strategies cater to the bitter, unsuccessful and struggling

Confusing. If you're gonna be selfish ("selfish, like all dating") might as well go for the gold

[–]sarkington 8 points9 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Sometimes relationships are mutually satisfying and synergistic

Sometimes

[–]cuckedalt 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Nash equilibrium

[–]smallstarseekerDogs don’t deserve us. ❤️[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Sometimes

Sometimes

[–]sarkington 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I don’t do guarantees

[–]Peacesquad [score hidden]  (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol

[–]HazyMemory7 20 points21 points  (53 children) | Copy Link

Fds is nothing like trp. Fds is hateful and devoid of any emphasis on self improvement or accountability. More or less a collection of women salty that the men they want to date wont date them.

Newsflash: desirable women don't need a "strategy"

[–]modidlee 12 points13 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

I always laugh when I see women say things like “how do I seduce this guy?” Ma’am if you have to do things to “seduce” a guy he doesn’t want you

[–]TomBerwick1984 3 points4 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

There are ways of behaving and dressing that can make a woman more sexually attractive. (e.g. tighter clothes, that reveal flesh is more arousing that being in baggy clothes)

Most men for example find women who act or dress masculine a literal turn off.

Which form of Ruby Rose are you more sexually attracted to

  1. https://i.pinimg.com/originals/f7/2c/b2/f72cb2d9185729e4d9af7dcf7e701d1e.jpg

https://i.pinimg.com/736x/3d/d1/39/3dd1391be6250cba5aebb46ed8a367f7--androgynous-haircut-androgynous-girls.jpg

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/a3/9f/b9/a39fb9bd22fd1591ffef5226f8ff5bc2.jpg

Or

2) https://www.redcarpet-fashionawards.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Ruby-Rose-Daring-In-Dundas-On-The-Tonight-Show-Starring-Jimmy-Fallon.jpg

https://pyxis.nymag.com/v1/imgs/c7c/a98/19359b12c9a5ddbaedc87d3920a652395f-ruby-rose-2017-03-06.rdeep-vertical.w768.jpg

https://fashionbombdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Hot-or-hmm-Ruby-rose-Asilio-The-Label-no-stone-unturned-white-dress.jpg

Do you think dressing like 1 would increase or decrease her chances of seducing a man she likes?

Do you think dressing like 2 would increase or decrease her chances of seducing a man she likes?

Have you never been turned off by a woman based on her mannerisms/behaviour? I definitely have, and so have guys I've known.

[–]NyahFriday 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's always funny to see people argue by posting pics of women who look great in short hair or pull off pixie cuts well. Like yeah sure, they look fine. But they would look much much better with traditionally longer feminine styles.

[–]BrofLong 6 points7 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

This is anecdotal of course, but you bring up a thought for me. I've definitely found women who present themselves in less traditionally feminine ways as attractive before. But I've almost always found the same woman as more attractive in a classic feminine style. Hair length for instance: I can only think of one woman who I've met in real life who I thought was more attractive with shorter hair instead of shoulder length (or at least neck length) hair. Admittedly, this could be resulting from decades of conditioning, so I'm not suggesting causation.

[–]sarkington 14 points15 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

Au contraire. FDS tells its members to stop dating and fix themselves first, to “level up” (complete with an entire separate sub for advice on that) and that a man is a bonus, not a purpose.

That’s precisely why they get so much shit

[–]Laytheblameonluck 11 points12 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

FDS doesn't tell them to fix themselves, it's all about "vetting".

[–]sarkington 10 points11 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

r/femalelevelupstrategy

Also, the tags “level up” “mindset shift” “advice” “how to high value” “strategy” “social group strategy” etc

[–]GYN-k4H-Q3z-75B 5 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

FDS tells its members to stop dating and fix themselves first,

I think you need to go back to Earth 2. This is nothing like FDS here, you're confusing things.

[–]sarkington 12 points13 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

The first rule of FDS is “be a high value woman”.

In other words, if you’re not a high value woman, there is no strategy

I don’t see what’s confusing about that

Please note that I am not FDS but still find it totally intelligible

[–]NFthrowaway8302021No Pill [score hidden]  (0 children) | Copy Link

I spent some time reading FDS awhile back. Level up = go to college and become a wage slave. They never talk about hitting the gym. They never talk about losing weight. They literally made posts about vague, intangible and unactionable advice and would say stuff like women have their "feminine" energy that they bring to the table and that's all they need to be a high value woman. They don't say stop dating. They literally tell women to withhold sex and make beta Billy wait while they fuck Chads on the side if they get horny. FDS is a pure confirmation of TRP straight from the horses mouth and they lack the self awareness to realize that.

[–]HazyMemory7 3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

If you have to go to another sub which nobody even goes to to talk about self improvement then it's not a very meaningful part of the ideology.

Fds is almost entirely "have standards that you aren't anywhere near enough of a catch to have" more or less, mixed in misandry.

[–]sarkington 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

They have plenty of improvement tags

[–]figuringMylifeBig Booty, Normal Waist 🥳 4 points5 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

FDS has self improvement and accountability. it’s literally TRP.

[–]heartheartdoki96 10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Fds is not real the way red pill men quote it. Like a fridge group of w9men that never got popular or took off, like all FDS groups literalky have like a few hundred or thousand active members. So weird you guys constantly bring it up when nobody really ever knew about or used FDS and still don't. When women want dating advice they'll got to r/relationships or to an all woman's forum, and the general advice for everybody on those posts is "get mental healthcare if you can, work on securing your support group, work through it if you can and you're happy, leave if you're not happy and can't see yourself being so or if yoir partner is shitty"

[–]HazyMemory7 9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The self improvement is make sure not to disclose your sexual past to your man LOL

[–]smallstarseekerDogs don’t deserve us. ❤️[S] 5 points6 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I had read through FDS specifically trying to find self improvement content and didn't find any.

It's mostly just about vetting men.

[–]sarkington 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

r/femalelevelupstrategy

Also, the tags “level up” “mindset shift” “advice” “how to high value” “strategy” “social group strategy” etc

[–]delight-n-angers 7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

It's mostly just about vetting men.

Isn't this the advice that men tell us all the time though? "vet men better or it's your own fault when you're abused and assaulted"

why are you mad about that?

[–]Stunning-Potato-1984 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah I don't know how they don't see this

[–]TermAggravating8043 3 points4 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

And yet I’ve never heard of women shooters or women groups killing a bunch of people,

Always a man usually in some women hating group

[–]HazyMemory7 12 points13 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Absolutely disgusting to even bring that point into a discussion in a dating themed subreddit. The deranged psychopaths that commit those atrocities are an astronomically small percentage of men, orders of magnitudes smaller than a tenth of percent. It has nothing to do with trp or the manosphere whatsoever, and ironically stuff like this is what led to the manosphere increasing in popularity. Women demonizing men as rapists, murderers, pedos ect... because of the actions of a few.

Men are naturally more aggressive as a result of the disparity in testosterone. Combine that with some individuals being psychopaths and lax gun laws in the US and that's why you get mass shootings.

There are crazy women out there that kill their husbands and end up in the news. Yet you don't see me bringing that kind of stuff up to make a generalization about women.

[–]TermAggravating8043 -1 points0 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

And yet their still all men

Has anyone anywhere every heard of a women or a men-hating groups actually physically hurting people?

Again something you guys don’t understand here, we know it’s only a small percentage of men that rape and murder women, but it’s more than enough to make us wary of all of you

[–]heartheartdoki96 -2 points-1 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

Fds is literally not even real. Red pill made it up to have another source to be pissed about. Show me any major FDS forum. I'll wait. Show me a history of FDS and prove it wss a major source of info. I'll wait.

[–]HazyMemory7 12 points13 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

Www.reddit.com/r/femaledatingstrategy

Seems pretty real to me

[–]heartheartdoki96 1 point2 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

Lol but dude it's never been popular or valid. Like you guys go around quoting red pill. None if thr women here and almost all women on earth know nothing about FDS and have never heard of it. Like I never heard of it until this forum

It's something you guys use to hate women. Like what the fuck do you want anybody here to do about FDS beyond not follow it when we don't even know about it and the women in FDS are not even active. Like? It's not a real group with any power. There's 100K people in this group and incels and red pill were huge as forums before being taken down. And there was a lot of like horrifying shit you guys tolerated or ignored, that's why they were taken down. Like not seeing many posts in FDS saying "women should be allowed sex slaves" and "should grooming be legal to secure mates if there is no sex prior to 18?" Like that's real shit people on incels AND red pill said. Red pill literally coined tbe term "divorce rape" and let's be real, they did it purely to ridicule rape and be able to say in response to rape stats "oh yeah men get raped in a different way".

Like nobody has a problem with general PUA, they've existed for years. They have a problem with red pill, because it's sexust and honestly pretty scary to most outside people, including most outside men, because of how toxic it is and how detached from reality it is, and how invested you guys are into this amd literally you use a name that refers to theme in a move of enlightenment and knowledge of truth.

Edit: so let's both scroll through 10 FDS posts and see if we find anything super crazy and let's share them. Then we will go through 10 PPD, not even a red pill only forum, and find the 10 craziest things and share those. Do you really think the FDS will be as crazy? You seriously deeply believe that?? Because I've been in this forum so many times at this point and you guys just walk past dudes saying tbe most insane shit. I just looked through 5 FDS posts, with around 50 posts each, and none of them have said anything crazier than "ladies If he wanted to he would". You game?

[–]coastFI_chaser -2 points-1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Can you actually cite what about fds ideology is hateful?

Also can you explain what their strategy is and purpose? I don't think the primary focus is being "desirable" rather high value and being able to vet dates.

[–]HazyMemory7 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, i'll type up a thorough reply later with some examples.

[–]kittenated 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Fds is nothing like trp. Fds is hateful

Exactly like TRP, then.

[–]Laytheblameonluck 2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Difference is FDSers generally do get what they want, they just don't want it.

It's more of a self help group in that respect.

For example, they mostly talk about "vetting" and not falling for the wrong guys anymore.

[–]sarkington 7 points8 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Increased selectivity is neither “going your own way” nor giving up entirely

And they know “HVM” are rare and they probably won’t get one. They’re still looking, though

[–]Laytheblameonluck 3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Point is FDS isn't counterpart to TRP, if anything it's reactionary to TRP.

Whereas TRP is reactionary to 2nd wave feminism, where women promoted the pill and AF/BB as a birth right.

And 2nd wave feminism was reactionary to how men used prostitutes in the 1800s - the Madonna-Whore complex being their excuse for joining men in sleeping around.

[–]sarkington 3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

FDS is a reaction to “low value men”

Are TRPers LVM?

[–]neetykeeno 17 points18 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Wasn't the last SATC episode made like...18 years ago or something...with only occasional movies since then to milk a little more from old fans of the franchise? And it wasn't exactly a very young woman's show when it was being made...aimed more or less at the mid twenties to late twenties crowd. And even then, as part of the age group in question I can assure you that it had somewhat of a niche viewer base, an entire generation was not tuning in to watch...only those who wanted that stuff watched it. Far more people watched Friends.

This is how hype for SATC has always worked...telling everyone it is more important, more transgressive, more titillating, more socially relevant than it actually is. There has been a reboot, there has been hype. Hype is not social reality.

You should rethink your opinion at least to the extent of not using such a stupid stupid example.

[–]heartheartdoki96 12 points13 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Wasn't the last SATC episode made like...18 years ago or something...with only occasional movies since then to milk a little more from old fans of the franchise? And it wasn't exactly a very young woman's show when it was being made...aimed more or less at the mid twenties to late twenties crowd. And even then, as part of the age group in question I can assure you that it had somewhat of a niche viewer base, an entire generation was not tuning in to watch...only those who wanted that stuff watched it. Far more people watched Friends.

Wow, what an insanely accurate statement that OP or the men agreeing will probably ignore and never address. It was a TV show, people watched it for the messy lives lol

[–]badgersonice 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Wasn't the last SATC episode made like...18 years ago or something...with only occasional movies since then to milk a little more from old fans of the franchise?

Well, a lot of non-native English speakers abroad use popular, out-of-date American shows (like Friends, Frasier, or S&TC) to work on their English, and likely some of them take it too seriously.

It certainly would explain why he thinks a dumb tv show on a subscription network has somehow brainwashed women into… I guess based on his reply to you, he’s mad women have careers and don’t marry straight out of high school like he wants? It’s not really clear why he’s so upset about a tv show.

[–]smallstarseekerDogs don’t deserve us. ❤️[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Hasn't the average age of marriage in US rose to 34 years?

Why do these career oriented women which spend their 20's on career and not just fucking around still aim for partners which out earn them?

AF/BB all the way baby.

[–]neetykeeno 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

You say AF/BB

I say... I think what you really worry about is what's gonna happen to Chris?

https://youtu.be/yVIG8Ar-teE

[–]AquaChipChad Catcher 20 points21 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

Isn’t the show Entourage basically Sex and the City for men. Wasn’t it a accepted and celebrated show?

Anyway, if you actually watched sex and the city you would know there is only one character (Samantha) out of the four women that acts like a high libido man. The other three women are a lot more relationship oriented and have long term and off and on relationships for the majority of the show. With the character Charlotte being the most sexually conservative of the four.

And Samantha doesn’t even use red pill manipulation and negging tactics. She’s just picky, has lots of sex and high maintenance and her sex and life experiences and pickiness are meant to provide the show comic relief.

[–]Pigeon_of_the_sea 12 points13 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

My first thought was OP never actually watched Sex and the City. Everyone that wanted to get married fell in love and got married.

[–]Laytheblameonluck 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Mr Big is the Chad who keeps Carrie clutching at the carousel and writing editorials about wine and cats.

The show was 20 years ahead of its time.

[–]Substantial_Wasabi 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

He married her in the end so eh

[–]smallstarseekerDogs don’t deserve us. ❤️[S] 1 point2 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Isn’t the show Entourage basically Sex and the City for men. Wasn’t it a accepted and celebrated show?

Entourage is a comedy show, and it's really fun to watch, but that kind of behavior is not celebrated IRL. Women are disgusted when men start analyzing, writing down and applying such behaviors IRL.

Sex and Life way of life is celebrated by the media, feminists... one would easily come to conclusion that it is socially acceptable behavior. But not by more traditional people, and I'd argue that most men are disgusted by the idea of becoming a BB.

If you actually watched sex and the city there is only one character (Samantha) out of the four women that act like a high libido man. The other three women are a lot more relationship oriented and have long term and off and on relationships for the majority of the show.

Through the series four of them had 95 partners, main character had 30. Average number of sexual partners for US women is 7.

And Samantha doesn’t even use red pill manipulation and negging tactics. She’s just picky, as lots of sex and high maintenance and her sex and life experiences are meant to provide the show comic relief.

Offcourse they don't. They just have to apply makeup and en are just lining up and they get to pick, and how convenient there is a willing knight on the white horse waiting on the finish line.

They never had to use manipulative tactics to get them to commit. IRL there is rarely a willing knight on the white horse waiting at the end of the line.

I can make a show in which women are willingly jumping into the laps of the "bottom" 80% men and they don't have to use manipulative tactics.

[–]heartheartdoki96 13 points14 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Sex in the city is also a comedy and everybody knows its fake lol. Like its Friends level fake and that is widely known ans accepted. So you're just trying to lie about how important it is. Stop lying dude, it's unnecessary and sad.

one would easily come to conclusion that it is socially acceptable behavior

What behavior? Bespecific. By which character? Do you know literally anything at all about the TV show? Or are you just saying that because women have casual sex in SITC and real life that the show is reflecting real life?

The series takes place over years, I'm not sure how many but several. Like some women have more sex than others lol. Charlotte has way less sex than Samantha, who has way more sex than Miranda.

Like so again, what proof do you have that SITC is used as an actual tool of guidance and not just entertainment?

Edit: your ranting got my curious so I looked up Friends, a show that doesn't actually center on sex. And we see Joey had 51 sexual partner and chandler had 10. So lol, how is sex in the city raunchy or bad when the most promiscuous character on the show still had less sex than Joey

[–]Pigeon_of_the_sea 3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

how is sex in the city raunchy or bad when the most promiscuous character on the show still had less sex than Joey

Samatha had sex with hundreds of men. There was an episode about that.

[–]heartheartdoki96 7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Yes, and some male characters have had sex with hundreds of men. Like that's not bad lol? Again, Joey had a ton of sex. And Joey isn't even the most sexual.

Black from golden girls had sex with about 164 men by the time the show ended. Like how is casual sex at an olden age bad??

Samantha and Blanche ad an espidoe about STDs and how they were safe and clean to. Like? They were stable women with lives and friends and hobbies lol hoe is thag bad

[–]AquaChipChad Catcher 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Entourage is a comedy show, and it's really fun to watch, but that kind of behavior is not celebrated IRL.

There are many men who use Entourage as a frame of reference to the life they want to live. That’s the exact same thing.

This article is literally entitled “SUCCESS ADVICE 18 Lessons We Can All Learn From The TV Show “Entourage”” and they are being very serious.

Women are disgusted when men start analyzing, writing down and applying such behaviors IRL.

There are men’s sex columnists all over the internet and they’ve existed for decades without any major uproar from women.

Sex and Life way of life is celebrated by the media, feminists... one would easily come to conclusion that it is socially acceptable behavior.

If you look up news articles about entourage you can also see how their lifestyle was praised by major publications

and I'd argue that most men are disgusted by the idea of becoming a BB.

Okay? Then they shouldn’t get married if they’re that paranoid

Through the series four of them had 95 partners, main character had 30.

Source?

Offcourse they don't. They just have to apply makeup and en are just lining up and they get to pick, and how convenient there is a willing knight on the white horse waiting on the finish line.

And this pisses you off because?…

I can make a show in which women are willingly jumping into the laps of the "bottom" 80% men and they don't have to use manipulative tactics.

Then do it.

[–]modidlee 5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I mostly agree with you. Women are encouraged to “have fun” and travel well into their 30s, while men who do the same are seen as “immature” childish and “eff boys.” One of my female friends literally told me I’m a “waste of a man” because some women would see me as “husband material” but I act like that’s the last thing I want. No one calls a single happy woman a “waste of a woman.” Guys that claim mgtow are seen as “incels” who hate women while you can’t throw a rock without hitting a woman who says she “doesn’t need a man.” They’re the same but viewed completely different because of the difference in how people view the purpose of men vs women. Society tells men they’re highest purpose is to sacrifice for the sake of women and children, have a family, be a productive family man, etc. While women are encouraged to be free and create whatever type of life they dream of.

[–]sjamad_oc -2 points-1 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Absolutely on point. A man who is an unabashedly carefree bachelor with zero intentions of getting involved with women beyond a casual hook-up will be met with vicious levels of hate from women, especially the 40+ crowd. Every female on the wrong side of 30 knows another same-aged woman (or 2 or 3 or 10) who ended up as a "leftover" with drastically slim pickings from the remaining men in her age bracket...if you show by your attitude and actions that you have zero desire to get involved in the "battle royale of the sexes: the middle-aged years" women INSTANTLY sense that (as not caring exudes the same energy as being a top dog apex male) and it sends middle-aged women into paroxysms of inner rage.

[–]Lift_and_LurkNo Pill 7 points8 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

You mean a bunch of people talking shit to puff themselves up online, but not actually doing any of it in real life? Yeah, probably.

[–]smallstarseeker1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

You mean you don't actually want to CMV, you are just here to talk shit out of your dirty mouth?

[–]delight-n-angers 10 points11 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

the creators of Sex and the City didn't create it to be a blueprint for real life though. It's very obviously fiction and fantasy. TRP presents itself as practical life advice. They're not the same.

[–]smallstarseekerDogs don’t deserve us. ❤️[S] -2 points-1 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Plenty of women apply AF/BB to their real life though.

[–]delight-n-angers 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Is that even what that show is about? AFBB I'd about settling. The one thing I recall from that show (I never watched it) was that the main character was trying to marry a hot rich guy.

[–]smallstarseekerDogs don’t deserve us. ❤️[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

was that the main character was trying to marry a hot rich guy.

Huehehehehehehe :D

[–]RinoaRita 10 points11 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

The one big difference is that sex and the city is a fictional show. You can say it sets a bad example and some people can’t separate fiction from dating advice. But sex and city hardly shows their characters as perfect. Carrie even goes to therapy because she chooses the wrong men.

On the other hand trp is almost the opposite where they are selling fiction fantasy as something that could be true if the person following it does it correctly.

Comparing the two is like comparing apples and oranges. Now if you compared trp and fds I would say you’re bang on.

[–]smallstarseekerDogs don’t deserve us. ❤️[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The one big difference is that sex and the city is a fictional show. You can say it sets a bad example and some people can’t separate fiction from dating advice. But sex and city hardly shows their characters as perfect. Carrie even goes to therapy because she chooses the wrong men.

The author of Sex and the City was a sex column writer living in NY. Sounds familiar? That's because she based it on her own life, she based Carrie on herself.

On the other hand trp is almost the opposite where they are selling fiction fantasy as something that could be true if the person following it does it correctly.

Rollo Thomasi also known as the godfather of TRP wrote his book based on his own life.

Comparing the two is like comparing apples and oranges. Now if you compared trp and fds I would say you’re bang on.

Tupurupuuuupuuu not

[–]AelfredRex 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

So a make-believe TV show is mirrored by a make-believe self-improvement cult? Yeah, I can buy that.

[–]Ok-Map-7596 8 points9 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Women fuck with fun guys, try to trap Chads and once they are used up they are willing to settle for some Beta Buck.

Would you rather the woman skip sleeping around with "Chad's" and just settle for the Beta buxx while she's young? I mean she still ain't going to be attracted to him of give him the sex he actually wants either way.

Men fuck with fun girls, they fuck women below their league which want to trap them, and then they are willing to settle with some homewife material.

Redpillers already encourage this and will throw a temper tantrum if a woman does something similar to this. Despite claiming sexual strategy is amoral.

[–]smallstarseekerDogs don’t deserve us. ❤️[S] 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Would you rather the woman skip sleeping around with "Chad's" and just settle for the Beta buxx while she's young? I mean she still ain't going to be attracted to him of give him the sex he actually wants either way.

What do you think about men which pump and dump women during their youth, then want a low N or virgin housewife when they want to settle?

Redpillers already encourage this and will throw a temper tantrum if a woman does something similar to this. Despite claiming sexual strategy is amoral.

Women encourage AF/BB behavior and will throw a temper tantrum if a man does something similar to it.

[–]ezbyte 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Why did you answer his first question with another question?

[–]smallstarseekerDogs don’t deserve us. ❤️[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Because the point of my post is not what women should do. By all means do whatever pleases you.

It's to create the understanding that men and women are disgusted by essentially the same behavior.

[–]badgersonice 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

So if the cases you laid out are the same behaviors and are disgusting for the same reason, then you’re saying that when the man-slut has fucked around with as many women as he could in his youth, and then wants to settle for a low-n or virgin housewife, he is treating that housewife like a lowly beta bucks. I agree.

Surely your thesis overall, then, is that women living the Sex and the City lifestyle are the ones enjoying the attractive men’s best, most passionate sex and effort, while the low-n/virgin housewives are just the boring loser who gets a used-up boring dude who expects her to clean up after him.

You’re definitely doing a great job of making being a virgin-housewife sound like the least appealing option possible for women.

[–]heartheartdoki96 7 points8 points  (22 children) | Copy Link

Jesus no lol. God why are men on this sub so bitter

The red pill is sexist pseudoscience. Sex in the city is a TV show with 4 main characters with wildly different world views.

Sex in the city doesn't agree on anything. The characters don't agree. That's the point. Red pill is about a bunch of bitter men who just repeat what the others said so it's all a bunch of men being codependent losers. Sex in the city is literally about how people may never agree because we all have different ideas and standards

Red pill is shitty sexist bullshit. It literally uses cult techniques. Like one step on red pill and red pill forums and alfalfa of the posts are "the world doesn't believe us, but we know the truth, we are the truly oppressed and we are also the sleeping giants and one day they'll all see and pay because men like us are very powerful but also very oppressed. Your friends and family can't be trusted, fhey don't want what's best, red pill wants what's best. Don't trust women, they are stupid or liars, red pill us the only thing you can trust". Yeah sex in the city doesn't do that. "Fe.ale dating strategy", which is not even a real thing and is something red pillers made uo to make it seem like they're less of a cult, doesn't even do that

[–]smallstarseekerDogs don’t deserve us. ❤️[S] 3 points4 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

When women do it it's great, but when men do it's disgusting.

OK.

[–]heartheartdoki96 3 points4 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Never said that at all, I said they're doing different things. And you're conflating a show being famous to people celebrating the morals in it. You think dexter means we tolerate serial killers as neighbors now?

Also you're clearly not here for discussions, so why are you postingbl?

[–]smallstarseekerDogs don’t deserve us. ❤️[S] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Sex and the city was just used to describe modern women culture of spending their 20's to fuck around, also known as AF/BF.

Feel free to delve on it, you are not changing my view by it.

[–]heartheartdoki96 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

It was not used to describe anything lol. It's completely fake. Like thr show makes no logical sense and is not in any way a reflection of real loge fude, and the authors never intended it to be. It wss a show based on a fiction book

[–]calfshrug -2 points-1 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

I implore you to learn about tinder and listen to the experiences of people like me - this will be an exposition to the problems of middling men, problems which begin to affect men when they’re still middle school (or younger) boys, problems which taint the confidence and psychology of many men from a young age

[–]heartheartdoki96 4 points5 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

I agree we have a unique mental health issue with boys, but I think red pills mental illness and insecurity is what causes you guys to latch onto the idea fhat sex or romantic ties are what you need to be happy and lack of that is why you are the way you are. But it's just not true lol

I've listened, I'm sympathetic, if you want help I'll offer it in terms of advice and guidance. But I think you're putting the donkey before the cart

[–]Sure-Vermicelli4369 -2 points-1 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

I think red pills mental illness and insecurity is what causes you guys to latch onto the idea fhat sex or romantic ties are what you need to be happy

Or, I dunno, maybe it's a biological imperative because it took two people to bring you into this world?

[–]heartheartdoki96 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Except we know it's possible to be sexless and happy, so blaming nature doesn't cut it lol.

And again, putting the donky before the cart. A lot of these angry men report being depressed as kids. And they claim its because they knew they'd be sexless. It's called a self-fulfilling prophecy. And red pill spreads idiotic messages like "10% of men get 90% of women" which mathematically makes no sense at all. It's a cult dude

[–]Peacesquad [score hidden]  (2 children) | Copy Link

Women don’t care about men struggles. Nobody believes me when I say it

[–]calfshrug [score hidden]  (1 child) | Copy Link

They do care once they have a struggling son

[–]Peacesquad [score hidden]  (0 children) | Copy Link

And then they’re not equipped to guide him(MOST of the time) due to lack of empathy. It’s a viscous cycle to be honest

[–]Laytheblameonluck -1 points0 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

What didn't the SATC characters disagree on, in particularly in regard to men?

[–]heartheartdoki96 2 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

What? What didn't they disagree on? Everything. Like they disagreed every single episode, that wss the whole concept of the show, like what do you mean?

Charlotte craved stability and marriage. Samantha wanted no strings attached sex. Miranda and carrie were figuring it out and less defined, but they were rarely in agreement on things

[–]Laytheblameonluck -1 points0 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

So Charlotte is the Married redpill in a dead bedroom, Samantha is true TRP, Miranda is blackpill/MGTOW, Carrie is PPD with a typewriter.

[–]heartheartdoki96 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Lol not really at all, but okay

SiTC Is just a show. Red pill is a gross cult

[–]YouAskedIt 3 points4 points  (24 children) | Copy Link

Dating in the 1920's.

When 34% of women admitted to having sex before marriage. When dating multiple people was a sign of popularity too.

[–]AidsVictim 0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

The 1920's were a radically socially transformative and unstable time. What's the point you're making?

[–]YouAskedIt 0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

That dating was no different 100 years ago. This isn't a problem of "modern women".

[–]AidsVictim 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

But 1920's were radically different from 1900 so it's a bit strange to say this is historically how it was. 1920's urbanite women are much closer to modern women than historical average. And even then 34% sex before marriage is a lot different than 90%+ we see now, not to mention birth control, there's still a large gap between 1990's and on women and women in 1920 on average.

[–]YouAskedIt 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Historical records show that in the 1800's over 1/3 of marriages involved a woman being pregnant and abortion was perfectly legal and advertised. That was without what we call dating. This isn't some new shit happening. People have always had sex. People no longer need to get married. That's what changed.

[–]smallstarseekerDogs don’t deserve us. ❤️[S] -1 points0 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

200 years ago, 500 years ago, 2000 years ago, then you have things which were celebrated or shunned in Nazi Germany or USSR, or that slavery period, or cannibalisms, marrying children... the list goes on.

The point is that society celebrating or shunning something doesn't necessarily make it right or wrong or just or fair.

[–]YouAskedIt 6 points7 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

People choose who they want or don't want. People have equal rights to pursue and to be rejected. That is the definition of fair.

[–]smallstarseekerDogs don’t deserve us. ❤️[S] 1 point2 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

So society which celebrates women and shames men for essentially the same behavior is not fair.

[–]YouAskedIt 7 points8 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

How is society shaming men for dating multiple people? They're not. It's commonplace and often discussed for people to have standards and not to commit until they are sure about a person.

[–]TermAggravating8043 1 point2 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

“Sex in the city” is toxic as fuck! People know this but still watch it cause it’s entertaining. Trying to suggest TRP is only mirroring that just shows how messed up it is.

[–]smallstarseekerDogs don’t deserve us. ❤️[S] -1 points0 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

TRP is mirroring IRL women spending their 20's to fuck around and then looking to settle in their 30's.

If there wasn't a large sexual market, then TRP wouldn't really have a point of existing.

[–]TermAggravating8043 7 points8 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

Jesus man, do you not think men are not sleeping around in their 20’s too? This “thing” you guys think that only a few guys are actually getting laid is bs, most guys are getting laid too.

This is what most people, men AND women do, try new relationships until they meet a person that makes them happy, most people actually settle down in their late 20’s.

TRP is just a fucked up method to try manipulate women from guys that aren’t naturally social

[–]smallstarseekerDogs don’t deserve us. ❤️[S] -1 points0 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

I got laid during my 20's too. I wasn't fucking entire town, but got laid... yay.

Average age at which people get married in the US is 34...

Women mostly fuck with manipulative guys in their 20's... guys are just learning the game which works best.

[–]TermAggravating8043 5 points6 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

Well I’m the uk is about 28,

Women fuck guys they want to fuck and guys do the same, to try n shame women for living the same way as men do is just fucked up and that’s the big problem with TRP

[–]DorianneGrey 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

The 34 number is from The Knot, not an official number. The US census says its about 28-29.

https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/visualizations/time-series/demo/families-and-households/ms-2.pdf?

[–]OhmaygahhGeriatric GigaChad 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Close. If unsuccessful men behaved more like the typical woman behaves during regular socializing and dating, the market would change for the better.

No arguing, just ghost. Any discomfort, just leave. No "debating" with women, life is too short to even attempt to change someone else's mind, the man should just leave.

A woman does anything that disrespects you or makes you feel like you're not #1 in her priority or interest, leave.

TRP doesn't make the connection, but it's basically modeling women's disinterested behavior right back to them.

That is a man's only "win-win" in those scenarios.

[–]No-Priority7869 -2 points-1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

TRP is a response to what Sex in the City did to women

That show created the entire urban liberal brunch boss bitch who don’t need no man by day / alcoholic whore by night Jekyll and Hyde persona that every woman with a job feels the need to inhabit as the main character of their syndrome in their post-college years now

[–]coastFI_chaser 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol you seem so bitter. Why would you care if thats how some women want to live their life whether its from sex in the city or not?

[–]nicethingyoucanthaveRed Pill Male -2 points-1 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

I see the point you're making, and I can agree that both of these represent a kind of sexual strategy.

Where I disagree is, feminism (and this is the theory that "modern women" are operating on) lacks any kind of coherent narrative that holds up under scrutiny. By contrast, TRP does hold up.

To put that another way, what TRP claims about men and women is true and what feminism claims is false. And that's a pretty important difference between them.

I realize feminists and blue-pillers will scoff at the two previous paragraphs, but where's your actual evidence? My evidence consists largely of this very subreddit. Anyone can come here and present a challenge against TRP. I have never seen any such challenge hold water (please link me to one if you disagree). Instead, the majority of challenges I see are just strawmen. I often ask blue-pillers to link me to examples of what they are claiming about TRP. I've never gotten an example.

The reason I believe feminism doesn't stand up to scrutiny is that it's constructed as a dialectic (in the sense used by Hegel) in which truth isn't the point - only revolution matters. Furthermore, feminism is based on extreme, radical behaviorism - to the degree that everything is labeled a "cultural construct" and even the possibility of innate differences, in the aggregate, between men and women, is rejected.

So for example, if you observe a difference in outcomes between men and women, the only possible explanation must be patriarchy and oppression. No other possibility is even considered. This is profoundly unscientific, and yet this is the current policy (and it makes perfect sense when you remember that the purpose, as I said above, isn't truth but revolution). I have many examples of people being fired for going against this policy.

As a result, if you start pulling at a thread in feminism, it all falls apart. And I'm happy to provide examples of that too.

...so. tl;dr - "modern women" are not, in fact, a mirror image of TRP. The ideology that informs the decisions of modern women doesn't actually reflect reality, while TRP apparently (given the inability of anyone to rebut it) does.

[–]smallstarseekerDogs don’t deserve us. ❤️[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm not even going to debate on which one is right and which one is wrong. The one which is wrong is going to blow back into the face of it's followers, as simple as that. And by followers I'm not just talking about the people but also tribes, cities, states, countries.

It's up to the people to be smart about choosing their philosophies and ideologies.

My whole point is that both of these promote very similar behaviors.

I would argue that TRP was created as the answer to the women sexual revolution. There wouldn't be much point in creating elaborate dating strategies if sexual market didn't exist.

[–]nicethingyoucanthaveRed Pill Male -2 points-1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

The one which is wrong is going to blow back into the face of it's followers

Well, women's happiness keeps decreasing. So there's that.

False ideologies don't necessarily collapse though (if that's what you mean by "blow back"). There are religions that are thousands of years old and still trucking along just fine.

[–]smallstarseekerDogs don’t deserve us. ❤️[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

What I really want to see is how much men which follow feminism are happy?

Atleast the ones which really believe into it, not the ones which just virtue signal to get into panties.

[–]Bunny_and_chickens 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Wow you created a whole straw army. Do you even know any feminists?

[–]nicethingyoucanthaveRed Pill Male 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Obviously I know more feminists, and know more about the ideology, than you do.

[–]todo_pasa_ -2 points-1 points  (25 children) | Copy Link

Sex and the City came as a result of many many many years of feminist struggle. The first feminist who said "fuck it, I'm going to sleep around with as many men as I can" she was probably called a whore.

TRP appeared only a few years ago. You still have A LOT to do to be able to have your own Sex and the City.

Social movements don't happen overnight and you don't get to them without pissing people off, like in the first decades of feminism.

Also TRP or mensrights don't have a discourse yet. Most posts are either against feminism or against women. I still see them as a movement against feminist, instead of having their own ideas to promote.

[–]smallstarseekerDogs don’t deserve us. ❤️[S] -1 points0 points  (24 children) | Copy Link

Sex and the City came as a result of many many many years of feminist struggle. The first feminist who said "fuck it, I'm going to sleep around with as many men as I can" she was probably called a whore.

TRP appeared only a few years ago. You still have A LOT to do to be able to have your own Sex and the City.

Women had been sluting up long before I was eighteen. I never got to experience a world in which I can smack a woman with my club and drag her into my cave.

If you are trying to imply to me that I'm supposed to suffer because of the "sins of my forefathers"... I had 2 grandfathers and 2 grandmothers, just like every woman in existence had.

So I'm going to do whatever the fuck I please to do.

Social movements don't happen overnight and you don't get to them without pissing people off, like in the first decades of feminism.

And they keep rolling even if it pisses of some people.

Also TRP or mensrights don't have a discourse yet. Most posts are either against feminism or against women. I still see them as a movement against feminist, instead of having their own ideas to promote.

TRP is all about getting your dick wet and properly vetting potential LTR's. You should check out mensright more, they are mostly about mens rights.

[–]Pigeon_of_the_sea 5 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I never got to experience a world in which I can smack a woman with my club and drag her into my cave.

Which is a good thing. Treating women like people is a good thing, folks.

[–]smallstarseekerDogs don’t deserve us. ❤️[S] -1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

It is a good thing.

Just saying, men and women which lived in that system are already dead or are one foot in the grave.

[–]Pigeon_of_the_sea 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

or are one foot in the grave.

I don't think there are any living cavemen.

[–]todo_pasa_ 1 point2 points  (20 children) | Copy Link

Women had been sluting up long before I was eighteen.

I don't know how old are you but this is what wiki says "First-wave feminism was a period of feminist activity and thought that occurred during the 19th and early 20th century throughout the Western world. "

I don't think you are that old

If you are trying to imply to me that I'm supposed to suffer because of the "sins of my forefathers"

I'm not saying that. I'm saying that if you want to fight for men's rights you have to be patient at least for a few decades. If everyone agreed of the first decade of a movement, that means there wasn't much to change in the first place.

And they keep rolling even if it pisses of some people.

Yes, pissing people off is exactly what disruptive political movements do. Or do you think the first black person was politely greeted "oh sure, you can sit wherever you want in the bus, go ahead!" No, they were probably called all sorts of racial slurs.

You should check out mensright more, they are mostly about mens rights.

I do, I read their posts and most of them are still anti feminists. The only concrete proposals I saw are the circumcision ones, but it's still unclear who are they screaming at. Is it jewish moms? Is it jewish couples? You'll probably encounter massive backlash if that discourse goes mainstream.

Also the divorce laws. In fact I think the divorce laws are the only concrete possible thing you can fight for.

The rest is still all over the place IMO

[–]smallstarseekerDogs don’t deserve us. ❤️[S] 0 points1 point  (18 children) | Copy Link

I don't know how old are you but this is what wiki says "First-wave feminism was a period of feminist activity and thought that occurred during the 19th and early 20th century throughout the Western world. "

I don't think you are that old

Women had started sluting up long before I was born. I had been living in the era of feminism for my whole life.

I'm not saying that. I'm saying that if you want to fight for men's rights you have to be patient at least for a few decades. If everyone agreed of the first decade of a movement, that means there wasn't much to change in the first place.

I'm well aware of that. This whole post is simply pointing out that mens disgusting behavior is a mirror image of women's disgusting behavior.

And they keep rolling even if it pisses of some people.

Yes, pissing people off is exactly what disruptive political movements do. Or do you think the first black person was politely greeted "oh sure, you can sit wherever you want in the bus, go ahead!" No, they were probably called all sorts of racial slurs.

And while fighting for their rights, they kept pointing out they should have the same rights as white folks.

I do, I read their posts and most of them are still anti feminists. The only concrete proposals I saw are the circumcision ones, but it's still unclear who are they screaming at. Is it jewish moms? Is it jewish couples? You'll probably encounter massive backlash if that discourse goes mainstream.

And feminism keeps shitting all over men for the past... forever? And promote indoctrination of men into soy boys. College campuses have pretty much became indoctrination grounds.

Change genders in feminist articles and they start looking like something written in the dark ages.

How about a right for all men to not be indoctrinated into B.S. which is going to get them burned latter in their lives?

[–]todo_pasa_ 6 points7 points  (17 children) | Copy Link

How about a right for all men to not be indoctrinated into B.S. which is going to get them burned latter in their lives?

Nobody is pointing a gun at men LOL they can think and do what they want.

Isn't it weird how feminism, POC, gays, trans and even some men like you mention all can fight together while men's rights can't even indoctrinate men?

Makes you think what kind of ideas are so unpopular not even men want to be a part of them.

[–]New_Relative_8709 -2 points-1 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

My guy is out here trying to turn a niche show from 20 years ago into a sociological fenomena

[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point  (9 children) | Copy Link

Attention!

  • You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.

  • For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.

  • If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.

  • OP you can choose your own flair according to these guidelines., just press Flair under your post!

Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]superincongruentfeminist\chad-ideologue 2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

SATC was pretty "redpilled" when you realize that Samantha was an unstable cluster-b nutcase, so Mister Big kept her in the fuckzone. (I never saw the movies where they got married.)

[–]badgersonice 3 points4 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Wasn’t Carrie the one obsessed with Mr Big? I thought Samantha was the one who had sex with a new guy all the time?

[–]superincongruentfeminist\chad-ideologue 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

probably, shows how little i care

[–]badgersonice 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Then your analysis is probably not that valid. I just had a roommate who was into it, so it’s not like I know the ins and outs.

But it’s bizarre of you to come up with a whole “it’s really actually redpilled because blah blah blah” theory when you don’t know anything about it.

[–]The9thElementNo Pill 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep. FDS and TRP are counterparts.

[–]Kentucky_Supreme 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I can kind of agree with some of it but I think TRP was a reaction to the "sex and the city" stuff that the mainstream fed women back when the show was around. Then social media came around and they all started parroting "know your worth, queen" and "500 lbs is beautiful" and shit like that. Plus you had simps affirming all of that stuff even further. The internet just exacerbated what TV started.

Then out of all of the guys getting played in the trenches of dating and destroyed in divorce courts, that's what spawned TRP.

I think some of it is mirroring but I think most is more of a reaction.

[–]Valuable-Marzipan761 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't think a twenty year old T.V. show is a great example of MODERN women

[–]SkeletonMagi 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I actually don’t mind when Sex in the City or Twilight or Fifty Shades of Gray are female emotion porn. I get to watch the male fantasy of my choice of female performing my choice of sex act often for free with ads.

We as men get to see what women actually fantasize over.

[–]smallstarseekerDogs don’t deserve us. ❤️[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I actually don’t mind

I don't either.

Better then listening what they claim are their fantasies.

[–]ruboyuri 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Do you know how dates and the direction of time work?

[–]Slight_Fig5187 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

As a woman, I never felt represented by Sex & the city, nor did I know any woman who was like them. But anyhow, my dim memory of the show is that only one of the characters (Samantha I think) was really promiscuous and shallow, and she was portrayed in a rather negative and ridiculous way. Of the others, Carrie fell in love with "Mr Big" and was forever struggling about what to do with that relationship; Charlotte was a shy inexperienced girl and I think a virgin for many episodes, and Miranda got together with a not very attractive and rather short man, who took care of their child because she was professionally more successful.

So, nothing terribly scandalous in most of it, which in any case takes place in the 90s, which were very different times.

[–]AidsVictim 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I wouldn't say they're mirror images exactly. TRP is a strategy for dealing with a low trust sexual environment - don't invest (or at least it's usually advised against) in single partners, maximize your individual welfare, use pattern recognition to predict womens behavior to aid in maximizing your desired outcome, generally assume negative or selfish motivations in your partner, etc.

The general womens sexual market is too varied to be as cohesive as a specific ideology like redpill (which isn't always that coherent itself). Generally women have so many options and power that selfish and consumerist behaviour is basically only limited by desire, which not all women are interested in but enough of them engage in it (covertly or overtly) that it makes the dating market very unpredictable. There aren't any concrete social or moral structures that bound behaviour so you're more or less on your own dealing with lots of potentially selfish behaviour - hence reactionary low trust dating strategies like red pill, or to an extent like FSD although is a bit different than redpill as well.

[–]Academic_Snow_7680 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Sex and the City? Dude, those women are in their 50's.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2023. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter