TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

WGTOW: Why are so many women dissatisfied with men?

February 11, 2020
14 upvotes

For the record, I think MGTOW is crap. I'm talking about this purely in the sense of "opting out" and not as a weird life philosophy.

Anecdotally and based on data, more women are "opting out" of relationships and staying single. Instead, they are cultivating platonic relationships with friends and using that as a substitute for romance. This is something I've personally observed a lot. Whenever I did romantic activities with my girlfriend, there would be a group of women out together.

Which begs the question: Why are so many women dissatisfied with men?

Is this a problem with women or men? Are women standards too high? Are most men bad partners? Why is the average women uninterested in the average man?

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/PurplePillDebate.

/r/PurplePillDebate archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Red Pill terms in post
Comments

[–]NarniaFox38 points39 points  (77 children) | Copy Link

You should take into account that some women stay single just because they don't have time for relationship. Not everyone, who isn't interested in dating, is dissatisfied with the opposite gender, sometimes they're neutral or have other things that demand their time and attention.

[–]geyges🐇14 points15 points  (53 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. Women got careers, they got friends, and they can get dick anytime if they need it. They're not in a hurry anymore, and they don't need to be because a man will magically materialize in their mid to late 30s, and will happily ever after them.

Realities of modern life as a woman in a corporate world.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

they don't need to be because a man will magically materialize in their mid to late 30s, and will happily ever after them.

I think this is sarcasm, because it certainly sounds like sarcasm...

[–]churnthrowaway123456No Pill5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

It's not. Women who are attractive and have careers can get a man whenever without playing games. The ones who need a "dating strategy" are unattractive and low-status.

[–]Sekina70 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Absolutely true ! I now have interest from 20 -60 year old guys and a lot are on paper hvm! I’m 35 but still get asked for ID to buy alcohol if not dolled up. I’m also in good shape childfree by choice with a good career & property, wide circle of mates and yes my darling cat lol. Multiple date offered from men who are not only willing to pay to court but ate offended if it’s not assumed, life is friggin great and I wish more women understood how good life gets at this stage I a woman’s life of she is confident and happy on her own skin and puts herself , her goals and dreams first BEGORE making a decision you can’t take back, poor things ,...

[–]NarniaFox9 points10 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

Well, I'm not sure about magical materialization, but I think that people are more okay with being single.

[–][deleted]  (11 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]NarniaFox0 points1 point  (10 children) | Copy Link

Tinder is for hook ups, not LTR.

[–][deleted]  (9 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]NarniaFox-1 points0 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

It isn't my projection, it what people here say. I've never used it myself. I know that you find a partner using online dating, it's just much easier to find a hook up there.

[–][deleted]  (7 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]NarniaFox0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

Online dating isn't popular where I live, so I can observe only what other people say.

[–][deleted]  (5 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–][deleted]  (14 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]geyges🐇1 point2 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

Marriage rates are irrelevant. The point here is that if a woman wants to marry, she'll marry.

As /u/NeedingAdvice86 correctly pointed out, the only reason they don't marry is the high standards of marrying an attractive, interesting dude with amazing personality. Once they're willing to compromise, its just a matter of time.

[–][deleted]  (8 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]geyges🐇-1 points0 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

the gem speaks to my point on compromises. I don't know why you bother arguing by proving me right.

[–][deleted]  (5 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]BCRE8TVEPurple Pill Man0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

There ARE endless men available.

Whether a woman is willing to lower her standards to catch one of them is a different question.

[–][deleted]  (3 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]BCRE8TVEPurple Pill Man0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Economically viable men?

Define economically viable?

After all, A shortage of “economically-attractive” men could be to blame for the decline in marriage rates, according to new research. .

If someone is still aiming for men who make 100K+, but that the amount of people doing that has halved, well, sorry, gonna have to lower standards to meet with reality.

Or potheads who play Xbox all day and are 300 pounds?

I totally understand turning down those people, but I doubt that's 80% of men out there.

[–]BCRE8TVEPurple Pill Man0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I heard that women are the gatekeepers of relationships, but men are the gatekeepers of marriage.

Women say yes to men dating them, and there's no shortage of that going around, but men don't have to propose, and if they see no real reason to, then the woman has to wait.

On the other hand though, I wonder how many women who are expecting their man to propose, would rather do the hard thing and actually propose themselves?

[–]Sekina70 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I would NEVER !!

[–]NigroqueSimillima0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

That's not actually true, the gap between women who say they want to be married, and the women who actually are married has been growing for some time now.

[–]NeedingAdvice865 points6 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

I can tell that you live in INCEL fantasyland more than in the real world actually being around actual women...not the virtue signaling PPD kind of women pretending to hate men and being vastly superior than all other forms of the species but real life women struggling to meet their intimacy needs. No these 30ish women are NOT going their own way living the life in a sea of attractive, interested men who they select to fuck every couple of weeks.......they are coming to cope with dadbod and belly rolled men with awkward personalities being their few chances or choice to fuck\date.... The ATTRACTIVE men with tight bodies and stellar personalities are usually dating\fucking someone in their late 20s.

Being somewhat attractive, successful and just getting to 30....I can tell you that women from 25 to 40 are always scoping out availability and looking for men. Had a girl just last week come up at a Super Bowl party at a sports bar talking about being sick and tired of being single....AND SHE WAS 28 years old.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The ATTRACTIVE men with tight bodies and stellar personalities are usually dating\fucking someone in their late 20s.

Are all these women well-toned with dimples over their perfect squat-regimen butts and just enough abs paired with non-saggy tits? Then what you described earlier vis-a-vis DAD BODS is what we call their ""looksmatch" and they're having trouble adjusting to post-wall life as choosy-beggars.

[–]geyges🐇1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This comment got better as it went. Well done.

[–]BCRE8TVEPurple Pill Man1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

they are coming to cope with dadbod and belly rolled men with awkward personalities being their few chances or choice to fuck\date

Sooo, they have to compromise because they can't find someone who meets 95%+ of their expectations?

Had a girl just last week come up at a Super Bowl party at a sports bar talking about being sick and tired of being single....AND SHE WAS 28 years old.

So why did she choose to be single? If being single was so bad, she probably could have lowered her expectations a bit to find someone and not be single, no?

[–]churnthrowaway123456No Pill-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Had a girl just last week come up at a Super Bowl party at a sports bar talking about being sick and tired of being single....AND SHE WAS 28 years old.

People who complain about being single just like to complain or are unattractive. Anybody who isn't a complete beast or insane can be in a relationship whenever they want, if they actually want to be

[–]OverEasyFetus6 points7 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

because a man will magically materialize in their mid to late 30s, and will happily ever after them.

You were right until you said that.

[–][deleted]  (7 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]OverEasyFetus2 points3 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Yeah but is he going to wife her up?

[–][deleted]  (4 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]Fichek3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I think you confused man for a dick. In those situations, it's a dick that 'materializes' for women, not a man. Don't confuse the two.

[–][deleted]  (2 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]AnActualPerson0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Sex and relationships are different.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Plenty of article on 30 year old plus journalist complaining about being single

[–][deleted]  (2 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

They were being sarcastic. It's obvious from all the recent articles that women who overtly focused on their careers are complaining that men their age don't want to settle for them

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

they don't need to be because a man will magically materialize in their mid to late 30s

lol, not a high quality one.

the guys that go for that type of women are generally scraping the bottom of the barrel because they are out of options.

guys in their mid to late 30s that have options are going for younger women.

[–]geyges🐇0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

not a high quality one.

I don't know why so many people assumed that the man will be high value. The man will likely be more valuable than she deserves, but less valuable than she wants.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 6 points7 points  (22 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, but even those women still want relationships. I dated this super type A career lady and it was interesting to say the least. She worked 10+ hours every day to climb the corporate ladder and never had time. She would often express how much she loved her job in an abstract sense, because of what it had the potential of becoming or doing for her. But in reality she hated the long hours and she felt unfulfilled. Maybe it was just her, but some successful women are just not happy with being capitalist slaves, even if it means more success, money, and upward mobility.

[–]NarniaFox9 points10 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

I think a lot of women aren't happy to be capitalist slavers. It doesn't mean though that they'd prefer to have a traditional family.

I have another example, my close friend works and studies all day long and she doesn't have neither time or desire to have/seek romantic relationship. She's too busy for it and, well, I suppose she doesn't see any reasons to shift her schedule in order to make some space for men.

[–]NeedingAdvice861 point2 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

What is a capitalist slave?

Such a lame term...

Let's be real...there are two choices, working to pay for the things that you want whatever they may be or letting other people work to pay for things that you want.

You really don't have to work long hours but you have accept that you will not be living the same lifestyle of those who do work.

Better a country of capitalist slaves working for their own lifestyles than a country of thieves living off the work of their neighbors and others...

What a lame term.

[–]NarniaFox2 points3 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

I don't necessarily agree with this term, but I get what people mean. It is okay to work and provide for yourself, it isn't okay though if you work long hours and earn a bare minimum or even less.

[–]woyspawn1 point2 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

You can't value effort. Only outcome has value, and that value is assigned by the rest of society.

[–]NarniaFox1 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

I know, it's still not very humane, when a person can't afford medical care.

[–]woyspawn0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

Society decides what's humane and what isn't. I guess you're thinking about the American system Vs universal health.

But by universal health you think of the NHS. Other universal health systems (ie the Argentinian) are inferior to the American one.

Also universal health works with strict border controls and homogeneous societies. Socialist policies aren't as easy to maintain with weak borders and heterogeneous cultures, because the humane factor you refer to is usually associated with tribal thinking.

[–]NarniaFox0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Canadian medical care system seems to work well and this country is full of immigrant.

[–]woyspawn0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Canada and Australia have a population deficit. US demographic composition is completely different.

When you try opening the borders of a successful socialist country, a brexit may occur. At distance, France seems to have a lot of conflicts and Sweden is a new experiment that only time will say if they will be able to integrate the new migrants, or if their society will fracture.

To me, it looks like America is the most successful country assimilating migrants (if you ignore the elephant of the ghettiffication of black communities), but the constant migration influx doesn't allow the population to stabilize.

[–]AnActualPerson0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

This just in: Capitalism Not Perfect, Maybe Even Bad

[–][deleted]  (6 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]Tomatoccino3 points4 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Wouldn’t most people prefer to be independently wealthy and just do what they wanted all the time? Until they got bored, that is...

[–][deleted]  (4 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]Tomatoccino2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

That’s why I’ve stayed in the workforce. Plenty don’t, though.

[–][deleted]  (2 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]Tomatoccino0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Use it or lose it. So many men die within six months of retirement, because it’s such a shock to their system to not be doing something all day.

[–]Sekina7-1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

You do realise plenty own their own passion project businesses and prefer older but Fit men who actually know how to truly please a grown woman and they don’t insist on going halves on every date -cringe lol. The women that are thirsty for box ticking life milestones usually have very low self esteem and /or no sense of self and also have kids. Taking kids out of the picture for women who see the biggest picture significantly changes things and it’s about pleasure as opposed to obligation or the “you’ll do” approach that desperate women have🤮...

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Wtf are you talking about?

[–]Sekina70 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

This was in response to someone who commented but they’ve since deleted their comment ....

[–]insertcredit2Purple Pill Man24 points25 points  (54 children) | Copy Link

There are a load of different answers here not just 1.

Women are making more money than men under 30 and going to college at a greater rate. This means it's hard for women to find a high value man around their age.

High value men have lots of women competing for them so they are very demanding and a lot of women want to be independent.

both sexes are less interested in chasing each other as they have more things to distract them than ever before. Internet, videogames, travel, porn, greater access to hobbies/leisure actives/larger social groups. Why would they want to give that up for a relationship?

Internet dating has made sex easy for women who want it.

a lot of women have fallen for the idea of working hard, and making money will get you a high value partner not understanding that high value men aren't looking for 35 year old women working 65 hours a week in middle management.

[–][deleted]  (4 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]Tomatoccino2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Except that the college grad will be in the same situation Karen from HR was 20 years ago, and not interested in a go-nowhere relationship.

[–][deleted]  (2 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]Tomatoccino0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Karens don’t though. They get old and cranky and write letters to the editor about kids these days. In the old days, they’d have had a “Richard Bucket” henpecked husband who built model trains in his shed to avoid them.

Don’t bother with Karen. Try shy Suzy from archives who’ll act out her Nancy Friday fantasies with you once you’ve earned her trust; or kooky Dora from design who has the good drugs and will make her golden retriever sleep on the couch when you stay over.

[–][deleted]  (30 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]Orange_PaisleyOrange pill is best pill5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

A 35-40 year old woman could easily snag a 40-45 year old man. I met mine at 41 to his 48.

[–]Sekina70 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Who I’d assume is probs by WAY better off than a men in his 30s who wants to live out his Hugh Hefner phase with young naive women who are impressionable , easily impressed and pliable / gullible. Bless

[–]PMShine12 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

My friend/coworker (39-40) was just proposed to by her 35 year old boyfriend.

[–]insertcredit2Purple Pill Man4 points5 points  (26 children) | Copy Link

They think they're trying to emulate what they find attractive, then they get mad when they find out men aren't attracted to status.

[–]brokegradstudent_9310 points11 points  (25 children) | Copy Link

I mean I didn’t go into my career to land a man, I went into my high status career so I wouldn’t have to rely on a man one day. So we would be equals

[–]redman3346 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Don’t read seriously these nonsense rant. I’m a guy and also looking for a woman that can support herself and can see me as an equal. Purple pill is just like every other pill, they try to rationalize and apply logic to every human interaction that ever occurred in the planet, and justify it with definitions of what people exactly want and why. Nonsense.

[–]brokegradstudent_933 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree. It’s nonsense.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I mean I didn’t go into my career to land a man

Ironically, the women who actually do that in a premeditated manner (the often-cited "Mrs Degree") are probably more successful at it than the women who go into a career hoping her excelling at it will attract some other high status guy.

[–]brokegradstudent_936 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I mean I don’t want an Mrs degree. The point wasn’t to get a man. But I tend to date in my socioeconomic class. I value my own intelligence more than I value having a man in my life. And it’s worked for me my entire life. I’ve never had trouble attracting high earners like me.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I’ve never had trouble attracting high earners like me.

Yeah, if you're reasonably hot and in your mid 20s (your handle indicates you are) and open to dating (with the guys who are open to dating you ofc), of course it works out for you.

[–]insertcredit2Purple Pill Man1 point2 points  (19 children) | Copy Link

Do you think a hard working guy is looking for an equal in terms of career? A guy who works a 60 hour week doesn't want to date a women who works a 60 hour week.

Your career is off putting to high status men because they don't want you working long hours while they work long hours.

[–]brokegradstudent_939 points10 points  (18 children) | Copy Link

I mean I tend to date doctors, lawyers, engineers, and finance professionals who value my career. But you believe what you want to believe.

[–]insertcredit2Purple Pill Man1 point2 points  (17 children) | Copy Link

They value fucking you. Why would a person value your career while expecting you to give it up for their children?

[–]brokegradstudent_932 points3 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

None of them expect that

[–]insertcredit2Purple Pill Man4 points5 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

You think they want their kids raised by nanny's and though childcare when they can afford to have a wife who stays home or works part time doing something creative she really enjoys?

Nah I'm sorry but they're lying to you.

[–]brokegradstudent_936 points7 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

Well my fiancé wants me to work. Maybe go part time when they are too young for daycare but a lot of men don’t want a stay at home wife. They want a two income household. Also my job is something I enjoy and I get to be a contributing part of society. I make sure communities have clean water.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, hypergamy is definitely a BIG factor.

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]beyond_relevant0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

market if truly free

Oh my god, free market is as much of a pipe dream as communism.

Like heres a thought experiment:

You have a bunch of competitors and they compete. Over time, one competitor outshines the rest and starts accumulating wealth. Competitors due to lack of wealth, begin to go bankrupt and soon enough, you have a monopoly.

Every competition eventually has a winner, and that winner dislikes competition. Free markets cant exist because people dont like to compete, they like to cooperate.

In a corporation, the balance of power may be unequal, but they are cooperating and not competing. You know what happens when people compete in a corporation? You get messy office politics and that is a sure way for company to start lagging and everyone loses. And this extends into every day life. Are you competing with your neighbors for whatever, or are you cooperating so everyone has a good life?

formal education in a university simply won't be as valuable as it currently seems to be

Education, if not applicable, is entirely useless. And i say this as a future solar engineer (hopefully).

[–]ninja_deli0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Women are making more money than men under 30 and going to college at a greater rate. This means it's hard for women to find a high value man around their age.

I'm curious as to what you consider a hvm? Someone who makes more money than their female SO?

[–]churnthrowaway123456No Pill0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy Link

Women are making more money than men under 30 and going to college at a greater rate. This means it's hard for women to find a high value man around their age.

Women don't care about how much money a man makes or if he went to college. Most career women marry a college or high school boyfriend as well

[–]insertcredit2Purple Pill Man1 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

[–]churnthrowaway123456No Pill1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

That's confusing correlation and causation. There's nothing to indicate that marriage is down because women demand that men have good jobs

[–]insertcredit2Purple Pill Man0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Well top level sociologists disagree with you but I'd love to read your study after it's been peer reviewed by an accredited scientific journal.

[–]churnthrowaway123456No Pill0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

You can pay for a study that says anything you want it to say. That one you linked is garbage because they started from the conclusion that income effects marriage rates and then plotted data to "prove" it.

Why does men making less money actually effect marriage rates when women don't give a shit about how much money a man makes when it comes to dating?

[–]insertcredit2Purple Pill Man0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

You are 100%correct that you can pay for a study to say anything. However you can not pay for that study to pass peer review and be published in a scientific journal. You seem to lack an understanding of how science works.

This also isn't about dating it's about marriage. Please go and read the actually study.

Edit: the actual paper is behind a paywall but I work for a university so if you like I can download it tomorrow from my office and send it to you if you are interested.

[–]churnthrowaway123456No Pill0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

However you can not pay for that study to pass peer review and be published in a scientific journal.

Yes, you can

[–]insertcredit2Purple Pill Man0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'd love it if you could elaborate because I find getting published exceptionally difficult.

[–]VetteVet83-1 points0 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Bingo! We can’t fuck your job and the fact that you never have time for us is unattractive. Also, All of that financial success doesn’t benefit as much because women still expect men to pay for half or more.

Women are pricing themselves out of the market. Men don’t seem to care very much.

[–][deleted]  (4 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]daddysgotanew1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Men don’t care about the same things that women do. Like marriage and kids. That’s a fact. He’s not wrong. You just said it yourself. Looking for someone to put it in. That’s the extent of what most men want from women. Nothing more, nothing less. Personally I enjoy relationships as long as they benefit me but I certainly don’t have dreams of a ring and tuxedo like women do with a wedding dress.

[–]VetteVet831 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Nor do you expect to profit in the event of a breakup, right? The diff between men and women is that most men don’t expect a lifestyle upgrade when getting into an LTR.

[–]VetteVet830 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Def not poor. Cracked top 10% income bracket in the US last year, at age 36.

Also saw my dad get divorce raped and know better than to marry a woman who doesn’t earn at least 70k/yr. I’ll date them, just no marriage so I don’t get that same divorce rape.

[–]Chandira14312 points13 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

I think social media/online dating are to blame. I grew up in a world without either. I believed in love. I worked hard to make myself into a good person/partner and I’m very happy in my relationship.

Recently, I had to create a social media page for a public position. Within about 6 months my impression of humanity has gone to complete shit. People are no longer concerned with being a valuable human, they are only concerned with marketing a persona on social media. Men HATE women, view them through a distorted sexual lens. Women HATE men and vacillate between being victimized and victimizers. They have no idea how to “own” their sexuality in a way that keeps them safe from physical and emotional harm. I guess I equate it to how men and women interact in a giant strip club world.

I hate it. I have to remind myself that there are others out there like me. I fear for my future children. (Edited to add more paragraphs)

[–]goneaway2thewind2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Accurate

[–]Willow-girlNot much to start with and worse for the wear2 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

People are no longer concerned with being a valuable human, they are only concerned with marketing a persona on social media.

I could never go back to my former career because it requires an insane amount of self-promotion, which sickens me.

[–]Chandira1430 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Girl, I’m struggling with that on a daily basis.

[–]Willow-girlNot much to start with and worse for the wear2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I wish I had an answer for you, but I don't. I wish it were possible to simply just do a job and do it well. It's exponentially harder now that so much time and energy have to be siphoned off for self-promotion.

[–]Chandira1430 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Wow. So true! I’ve put so much of my time into marketing myself (or some version of myself) that it’s taken a tremendous amount of emotional energy out of my daily life.

Actually just talking about this “out loud” makes me feel better. It validates a lot of the struggle I’ve felt lately. Thank you.

[–]Willow-girlNot much to start with and worse for the wear0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

You're welcome. The struggle is real! In my former profession -- journalism -- only freelancers had to market themselves relentlessly. Once you had a staff position, you could kinda settle into just getting the job done. That was already starting to change when I left the business in 2003. I can't imagine how bad it is now!

I chucked my career and went to work on a dairy farm and have been farming ever since. I love it! I don't even own a smartphone, lol.

But I realize that choice is not going to work for everyone ... :-(

[–]Reverend_VaderSith Lord11 points12 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

My own take on this is that there is a mixture of experience with "bad" men and by that I don't mean abusive and such, just guys that offer little to improve their life outside of company and $$$, men's main "use" is also taken for granted (providing and supporting) so they no longer get brownie points from women for fulfilling their historic obligations, it's still covertly expected (I watched my dating pool turn into a puddle when I communicate that I don't pay for women anymore)

Add to that the constant noise of "historic oppression" and women telling each other they do more for the guy than the guy does for them, creates a mindset of never feeling it's worth the hassle

Put both together and remaining single will always feel better than being in a relationship

That said my personal experience is most single women my age have thrown in the towel due to a history of shitty partners or they have too many issues of their own to attract a man they desire for a LTR, then there are the undatables

I'd guess at less than 5% of women I know being single but I'm closing in on 50 and a lot of the relationships I see are of convenience, not love when they talk to me in confidence or vent and I'm left thinking "why stay"

I'd say the men in my bubble feel exactly the same though so it isn't a women dissatisfied, it's men as well

[–]Willow-girlNot much to start with and worse for the wear2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That said my personal experience is most single women my age have thrown in the towel

This is what the incels don't factor in when they talk about women 'hitting the wall.' So many women kinda give up on men that it makes things much easier for the ones who are still interested in a relationship. Really, all you have to be is childfree and of a normal weight!

[–]prunusamygdalis20 points21 points  (61 children) | Copy Link

If you are a woman in your early 20s and you wanna do the wild and crazy college co-ed thing, you do that. This is a very low percentage of girls, probably between 1-5%. The rest of them are looking for a boyfriend/life partner.

The issue...men in their early 20s are children. Men do not seem to be ready to settle down and actually commit until their mid to late 30s at earliest. So these girls end up dating some kid for 5, 7, 10 years... only to realize that he has 0 plans to move into the next stage of life with her.

So she leaves him. That is where I find myself now. Men in their late 20s/early 30s are better than early 20s, but still have glaring, horrific flaws. They are mostly addicted to pornography, to the point that many are sexually dysfunctional. There is the additional grossness to knowing your partner is expending a good portion of his sexual energy staring at close ups of untold number of womens' genitals and/or mouth instead of investing it into your union. It really does feel like cheating, the level to which most men compulsively use porn. They also will insist on porn-like sex, which can be painful and degrading. Not romantic at all. After a while of this, the woman gets sick of the man's shit and dumps him. Then she is single once more.

It seems like men are refusing to live up to their end of the bargain, and that is why women are opting out. Women want marriage, a home, a family, and are willing to contribute in every way possible (including financially, most of us are college educated and work decent jobs) to this future. Men refuse to commit, obsess about porn and childish hobbies like videogames, and just generally are a waste of time.

Even if you find one who has interesting hobbies (aka not vidja, netflix and chill as the only dates, etc) they are usually promiscuous af, bouncing around fucking as many women as they can find, and that is profoundly unattractive. They can do this because just by... being a rock climber/musician/trail runner/salsa dancer/whatever in their spare time they are above 90% of other men in terms of being interesting and they know it. They use this to just slut around with women in whatever scene they frequent.

Basically, men inherently want to have sex with as many women as possible. The ones with interesting traits have a lot of female interest and utilize this to do so. The ones who are boring, out of shape, low achievers are not prizes. ALL of them are obsessed with pornography, which is icky af and radiates from them during sex.

So yes. Men are not satisfying. They are not worth the effort. They are not worth the work it takes to be in a relationship with them. For netflix and chill and porndick? No thank you.

[–]abstractsadgurl9 points10 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

I agree with this post and about porn. It's a huge turnoff actually I'd rather be single than settle.

[–]prunusamygdalis10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

My ex was a "normal" user, as was I... as in maybe every few weeks or whatever when the other one isn't available for sex, and he wasn't the type to watch super degrading/painful/horrible shit or try to replicate porn during IRL sex... and so I didn't even care at all. Men want to act like we are saying NO PORN FUCKING EVER but it's more like "daily ingestion of gangbangs, choking, painful basically-rape to the extent that your sexuality is skewed and your dick doesn't work" that we have an issue with. Daily sexual gratification watching multitudes of other women, and we are supposed to want you?

I too would rather be single than be with a porn addict. I have... suspicions about my current partner's use and we are on the way out. I hope there are more non-PA men like my ex out there but it looks bleak.

[–]BCRE8TVEPurple Pill Man1 point2 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

When you say settle, are you saying you'd rather be single than be with a guy who meets 95% of your expectations? 90%?

What exactly is the cutoff for 'settling' here?

[–][deleted]  (6 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]BCRE8TVEPurple Pill Man0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

My baseline at first was: Not an alcoholic, not a druggie, doesn't drink and drive, supports himself somehow. Like, it doesn't seem like I'm asking too much for 100% completion there.

Yeesh, that baseline can't be met? Man, if that's the case, I guess the competition is going to be far easier than I thought it would.

I turned down SO MANY GUYS for one of those things. Seriously, in some parts of the U.S., these are high standards. And yes, I would consider that if a woman had those standards and ended up dating someone who didn't meet them, she was settling.

Yeah honestly for that very generic and simple baseline, that should be standard. Maybe dating prospects are better where I'm at in Canada?

The porn stuff is up to each couple to decide what the dealbreaker is.

Absolutely fair.

[–]richlad0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Yeesh, that baseline can't be met? Man, if that's the case, I guess the competition is going to be far easier than I thought it would.

That's after being within the cutoff for sexual attraction.

[–]BCRE8TVEPurple Pill Man0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Perhaps there's something to do with the sexual attraction that is finding so many men who fail to pass those basic standards?

[–]richlad1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

What's his incentive to give up smoking or drinking or playing games if he is getting sex without giving up these things.

[–]BCRE8TVEPurple Pill Man0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Heck if I know. Smoking and drinking a good incentive could be health, but unless they want to do that for themselves, I don't think there's much incentive that would work.

You can't make people change. You can only encourage them to change themselves.

[–]prunusamygdalis3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

It’s more like certain things are major dealbreakers. Porn issues are fucking terrible. Nobody wants to marry a porn addicted man. It’s grotesque to women.

“Here’s your “prince charming” the great love of your life... but he stares at other women getting rammed in the pussy and mouth all day”

No woman wants that to be the great love story of their life. It’s better to move on.

With other features, I’d say I can be happy with someone who has 75% of the things I look for.

[–]BCRE8TVEPurple Pill Man-1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Porn issues are fucking terrible. Nobody wants to marry a porn addicted man. It’s grotesque to women.

Honestly tho, porn addiction isn't really a thing. It's not a medically recognized condition, and if we're judging by that I might have a "reddit addiction", but I know that my problematic use of reddit is an unhealthy coping mechanism I developped when I went through an abusive relationship.

There is something driving porn use for sure, but that doesn't really make it an addiction.

Assuming you are in the US, there's a rather unhealthy culture about sex down there, and excessive use of porn and unhealthy attitudes towards it all around would definitely contribute to the problem.

“Here’s your “prince charming” the great love of your life... but he stares at other women getting rammed in the pussy and mouth all day”

Unfortunately, the # of princes out there is vastly inferior to the number of regular dudes ;) Expectations of prince charming are in part to blame as well. We're all flawed, we are all works in progress, and if we're expecting prince charmings and princesses, we're all going to be a bit disappointed.

Per staring at women getting rammed in the pussy and mouth, definitely unhealthy attitudes around sex in the US it feels like. Sex being completely divorced of any kind of physical and emotional intimacy, and becoming just a selfish act of pleasure, is definitely going to cause a lot of problems.

No woman wants that to be the great love story of their life. It’s better to move on.

Problem is that love doesn't just happen. Love is something that has to be worked at. It's like tending a garden, it's not just going to happen on its own. Definitely wiser to pick a partners who knows how to maintain a garden than a slacker, but on the other hand it's possible there are people out there who just don't know how. Not your job to teach everyone out there, but it's worth keeping an eye out for those who would be willing?

With other features, I’d say I can be happy with someone who has 75% of the things I look for.

Fair enough. I'm working on myself and going to make a list of my own values as part of my therapy, and going to make a list of things I'd like in a partner.

If you don't mind me asking, what would be part of the 75% of things you'd be looking for?

[–]prunusamygdalis1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Active and healthy (and therefore normal/healthy BMI, not sedentary), college educated, decent career doesn’t have to be anything crazy, enjoys bettering himself and learning/experiencing new things, adventurous, kind, and respectful. That would be perfect. If he has hobbies I don’t care for as long as they’re not like... intrusive it’s fine. I wouldn’t date someone who played 4 hours of vidja a day for example. Or someone who blasted music I hate all day every day. We need to have some overlap in taste when it comes to entertainment so we can do things together.

[–]BCRE8TVEPurple Pill Man0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Active and healthy (and therefore normal/healthy BMI, not sedentary), college educated, decent career doesn’t have to be anything crazy, enjoys bettering himself and learning/experiencing new things, adventurous, kind, and respectful.

Honestly this all sounds perfectly normal, and I'd be looking for the same thing in a partner for myself as well.

What's your definition of a decent career?

I wouldn’t date someone who played 4 hours of vidja a day for example

What if it's 4 hours a day, but only one or two days a week?

Or someone who blasted music I hate all day every day.

Totally fair, I wouldn't either.

We need to have some overlap in taste when it comes to entertainment so we can do things together.

For sure, sounds properly basic for having two compatible people for a healthy relationship.

[–]BCRE8TVEPurple Pill Man3 points4 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

childish hobbies like videogames,

I'm sorry to hear that you don't like it when men have hobbies to make their lives enjoyable. Why do you think this is a problem, exactly?

Even if you find one who has interesting hobbies (aka not vidja, netflix and chill as the only dates, etc) they are usually promiscuous af, bouncing around fucking as many women as they can find, and that is profoundly unattractive. They can do this because just by... being a rock climber/musician/trail runner/salsa dancer/whatever in their spare time they are above 90% of other men in terms of being interesting and they know it. They use this to just slut around with women in whatever scene they frequent.

So you're looking for say the top 10-20% of guys, and then are surprised when that same top 10-20% of guys is also attractive to the majority of women?

Basically, men inherently want to have sex with as many women as possible.

Not all of them no, but there's definitely an unhealthy sexual component in expected male behaviours. Being able to have many sexual partners is a sign of success in traditional male gender roles, because the vast majority of men just cannot have that.

I am curious to know though, how have you vetted a potential partner's interest in more romantic relationships, rather than primarily sexual ones?

The ones with interesting traits have a lot of female interest and utilize this to do so. The ones who are boring, out of shape, low achievers are not prizes.

Again, top 20% of men receive the attention of the majority of women. I'm sure those who are not in that top 20% who are not ALL boring, out of shape and low achievers.

Are you willing to settle for a romantic committed partner who doesn't check off every single item on your list?

ALL of them are obsessed with pornography, which is icky af and radiates from them during sex.

That's fair. I honestly don't know how to address this problem. There is a hugely unhealthy culture towards sex in the US (I'm assuming you're from there).

So yes. Men are not satisfying. They are not worth the effort. They are not worth the work it takes to be in a relationship with them. For netflix and chill and porndick? No thank you.

Per porn dick, do you think it is possible to teach your partner how you want to have sex?

[–]prunusamygdalis-1 points0 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Again, top 20% of men receive the attention of the majority of women. I'm sure those who are not in that top 20% who are not ALL boring, out of shape and low achievers.

I really don’t know. It’s also hard for me because I am not basic. I can’t be with a man who sits around watching sportsball/playing vidja and listens to top 40s rap music. I just can’t. Or a stuck up gym bro. Any HINT of negging/misogyny and my vagina desiccates. I’m not going for the stereotypical “Chad.” I am looking for a man who is intelligent, educated, active and therefore relatively fit/not a blob, interesting/passionate, and kind.

And it does seem like the vast majority of males don’t fit that bill. But I am all of those things, and I’d rather die alone than settle with some boring asshole who never has a single idea of an exciting activity to do (note, exciting =\= $$, I love hiking state parks, tubing on rivers, climbing gyms, etc) and sits on his ass all day doing boring useless shit then wants me to suck his dick in front of Netflix.

I basically always vet for romantic interest. I don’t do casual, there’s nothing in it for me.

As for teaching, absolutely. My longest LTR, we were both young and inexperienced and taught each other what the other liked. My current LTR he was already experienced so I only needed to nudge him in the right direction as to what I specifically like... he’s mid/late 30s and has had multiple 5+ year LTRs so he knows where the clit is, what a female orgasm looks like, and how generally to bring one about.

If I end up single again and then with a man who is not great but eager to learn I have no issue explaining/showing how I like to be touched. It’s not a big deal at all, and is in fact expected with a new relationship. The issue is that a lot of men seriously give 0 shits about learning and think that sex is entirely for their pleasure. I had a couple of those while I was dating around, and I cut them off very quickly once I realized they were selfish in bed. It’s a NO.

[–]BCRE8TVEPurple Pill Man1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I can’t be with a man who sits around watching sportsball/playing vidja and listens to top 40s rap music. I just can’t

You can do other things while he does that, you know. I'm sure there are things you like to do that your guys wouldn't want to partake in either. This sounds a bit like saying they're not entitled to do things with their lives if you don't approve of it.

Any HINT of negging/misogyny and my vagina desiccates.

On the one hand that's fair, but on the other hand we're all a little bit racist/sexist/whatever, yourself included. Do you think it might be a tad possible you're also the slightest bit misandrist? Wouldn't it be a double standard for you to let nothing at all slide re:mmisogyny, but expect them to be fine with a bit of man-hating/nagging on your part?

I am looking for a man who is intelligent, educated, active and therefore relatively fit/not a blob, interesting/passionate, and kind.

Honestly that's great. Do recognize that this man is going to have flaws and do things you don't like, and there is maybe one or two out of 7.5 billion who won't have any of those flaws you don't like. Unless you're willing to wait for Mr One-In-A-Billion, you're going to have to pick your battles.

But I am all of those things, and I’d rather die alone than settle with some boring asshole who never has a single idea of an exciting activity to do (note, exciting =\= $$, I love hiking state parks, tubing on rivers, climbing gyms, etc) and sits on his ass all day doing boring useless shit then wants me to suck his dick in front of Netflix.

I don't know where you're going, but I find it highly suspicious that you haven't been able to find a single intelligent, educated, active, interesting, and kind guy. You seem to imply that they're either all inactive amorphous porn-obsessed losers, or if they're intelligent, active, etc etc etc and they do a single thing you dislike (watching sports, playing video games, listening to rap, all of which are perfectly fine, normal, and respectable hobbies), then you absolutely positively can't stand any of it.

I mean if you want, go find an Amish, you won't find them watching sports, playing video games, or listening to rap. Perhaps you ought to allow guys to have hobbies even if you don't like them?

I basically always vet for romantic interest. I don’t do casual, there’s nothing in it for me.

That's fair. It does take some commitment though, and if you bail at the slightest sign of someone playing video games or anything close to what you dislike, you're going to be bailing on an awful lot of people who could have been great partners.

As for teaching, absolutely. My longest LTR, we were both young and inexperienced and taught each other what the other liked. My current LTR he was already experienced so I only needed to nudge him in the right direction as to what I specifically like... he’s mid/late 30s and has had multiple 5+ year LTRs so he knows where the clit is, what a female orgasm looks like, and how generally to bring one about.

Honestly that's fantastic! I don't understand the attitude of "men are all terrible at sex so I'm not going to teach them anything", because that's just going to make sure the problem continues.

The issue is that a lot of men seriously give 0 shits about learning and think that sex is entirely for their pleasure.

Yeah that's definitely a problem. There are a lot of harmful attitudes about sex in the US. I hope it's better in Canada around my neck of the woods.

Not possible to have a frank discussion with them? Definitely a non-negotiable, sex is for mutual pleasure, but at least a discussion allows them to perhaps come around?

[–]says_harsh_thingsRed Pill - Chad0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I’d rather die alone

I've got good news for you then

[–]prunusamygdalis-2 points-1 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol maybe. I get pursued a lot, so maybe not!

[–]diffdedbedGreen Eyed Devil4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

How much of your own relationship do you think you are projecting onto "men"?

[–]prunusamygdalis2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Some, for sure. But I am a very social, extroverted person and I've seen these same patterns with MANY female (and male) friends and acquaintances. It's especially easy to see with acquaintances in a social group: males trying (and sometimes succeeding) to maneuver around being skanky.

Also my ex was a weird exception, he really only had eyes for me and wasn't the type to want to bang as many women as possible. He had legitimate, deeply emotional platonic relationships with females and was just kind of an unusual dude. It was one of the things I loved most about him.

But yes, in my experience men want what they want from women but they have 0 interest in providing what women want. And that is quite simply not going to work. It has to go both ways. Both sides have to compromise. Women almost ALWAYS end up having more sex than they would ideally prefer in relationships because males have a higher drive. I have no issue providing this, given that my needs are also met... and that includes stability and commitment.

[–]Willow-girlNot much to start with and worse for the wear1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

OMG, I'm old so I missed most of this dysfunction, but I've always suspected that things are pretty bad for many younger women nowadays. :-(

[–]BuildAnything1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This reads like MGTOW but for women, yikes.

[–]ThorLivesSkeptical Purple Pill Man0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

They can do this because just by... being a rock climber/musician/trail runner/salsa dancer/whatever in their spare time they are above 90% of other men in terms of being interesting and they know it.

I need to move to wherever you are because it's not anywhere that easy where I am. Assuming, of course, that this isn't just hyperbole - which seems more likely.

[–]prunusamygdalis0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

A man who is passionate and engaged in multiple hobbies, at least one of them physical, is profoundly attractive. If he socializes and engages in these things he will meet women. Yes, there are still different facial features/voices/whatever that different women like. But he will have interest unless he’s like hit with a frying pan ugly in the face.

[–]richlad0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

A man who is passionate and engaged in multiple hobbies, at least one of them physical, i

You contradicted yourself when you said you don't like stuckup gymbros, lots of physical in gym.

[–]prunusamygdalis0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s more attractive when someone is physical in a functional way tbh. Dudes who snowboard, hike/trail run, etc. gym bro-dom is way more narcissistic and obsessed with aesthetics. A body that looks like it MOVES is hotter than one that looks like the owner chugs protein and skips leg day

[–]Physiologist21Cynic-1 points0 points  (33 children) | Copy Link

Lol when was the last time you were in a college environment. It's not 1-5% I can tell you that. 10-50% might be too low.

[–]prunusamygdalis6 points7 points  (32 children) | Copy Link

I live in a college town right now. No, the vast, VAST majority of young women are not engaging in even 1/100 offers they get from boys. They will sleep with one here and there but its always with the hopes that it's going somewhere, aka it's the beginning of a relationship. Then if it doesn't, they're on the search again. Men, especially young ones, aren't even good at sex. They quite literally need to be trained how to give head, find and stimulate the clit, etc. There is 0 reason to have a bunch of shitty sex with random early 20s males that are gonna try to stick it in after negligible foreplay and cum within 5-10 minutes.

[–]Physiologist21Cynic2 points3 points  (31 children) | Copy Link

I find it interesting you look at communication as "need to be trained" amongst the rest of the dribble. Seems like a lot of "you" problems to me.

[–]prunusamygdalis4 points5 points  (30 children) | Copy Link

shrugs

not my fault so many men are shitty in bed. It's a huge reason why women tend to stick with a decent one once they find him... not only can't most men find the clit they don't even care to try, it's 100% about their gratification and using your body as a porn prop. I couldn't even count the amount of threads I've seen on r/relationships, r/deadbedrooms, etc where women are in relationships with men who do NOTHING for them sexually. Literally these losers get an orgasm every time while she gets NONE like a glorified fleshlight. They'll even bitch about her trying to get herself off or use toys even though they are not willing to do shit to please her, it's disgusting. I've had friends admit that a dude they hooked up with for months had never given them an O. This is not uncommon.

[–]Physiologist21Cynic1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Yes exactly, it's everyone else's fault. Well done.

[–]prunusamygdalis-1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Wahhh. Spend more time learning where the clit is and less time being triggered about reality.

[–]Physiologist21Cynic1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Fascinating, it always blows my mind how people like you waste all that time projecting and then try to pretend you are superior. Enjoy your life, you are clearly very well liked and successful.

[–]prunusamygdalis-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Thanks, I will :D

[–]MakeMoneyNotWar[🍰] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Wait wait wait, you're complaining about men being shitty in bed, but also complain about men sleeping with lots of women. How do you think men get good in bed?

[–]prunusamygdalis0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Lmao sleeping with a bunch of different people is not required to become good in bed, Jesus Christ. My ex and I surely fucked well over 1,000x.

[–][deleted]  (2 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]prunusamygdalis0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

It's theirs, of course. And yes, the ones who are interested in learning, learn. Many are not. They just don't care. Personally I can't imagine sex where I didn't care about the other person's orgasm whatsoever, but this is the reality of how a lot of men feel.

I don't date men who aren't eager to give pleasure and whenever I hear one of my girlfriends talking about men who are not I encourage them to dump his ass like last week's trash. But unfortunately some women are brainwashed enough to think it's acceptable and/or normal to be used as a sex toy by men, and that some male attention is better than none.

[–]BCRE8TVEPurple Pill Man0 points1 point  (20 children) | Copy Link

How often have people tried communicating their needs with their partner, and tried to show them how to be better at sex?

Kinda curious, I've only been in one relationship, I was terrible at sex at first without really knowing, and once I figured it out I did my best, but all the learning I did on my own. Not blaming it on her, we were each other's first, but seems to me that there's an expectation of being good without much communication going on to teach guys how to actually get better.

Am I wrong?

[–]Willow-girlNot much to start with and worse for the wear1 point2 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

You have to really, really like a guy to get beyond a problem like "death grip." And he has to be willing to stop jerking in order for the problem to resolve, and I imagine some men aren't willing to do that.

[–]BCRE8TVEPurple Pill Man0 points1 point  (14 children) | Copy Link

I don't know what the death grip problem is. I don't know what it means.

I don't think a man necessarily has to stop jerking for the problem to be resolved, but if it's done in an unhealthy way, or in a way that causes issues with the relationship, it definitely has to be changed.

If the guy has a higher libido than the girl, it's definitely too much to expect him to stop completely, but on the other hand if his jerking it is affecting bedroom performance then it definitely needs to be cut down.

[–]Willow-girlNot much to start with and worse for the wear0 points1 point  (13 children) | Copy Link

'Death grip' happens when a guy masturbates so much that he becomes accustomed to a particular sensation -- a tightly-clenched hand -- and can't reach orgasm without that level of stimulation.

[–]BCRE8TVEPurple Pill Man0 points1 point  (12 children) | Copy Link

Aaaah, gotcha. I do think it would be possible to overcome that, but it will take time and effort working with a partner. It's probably a trap to fall into porn that you can so easily satisfy the physical urges on your own like that, but we can retrain our brains. Again it would require a commitment in terms of time, effort, and a supportive partner though, and people seem to want the benefits of a relationship without putting much effort into maintaining that relationship.

[–]prunusamygdalis0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

It’s more the lack of trying. Everyone knows women need foreplay. Fucking everyone. If you sleep with a man and he makes no effort to get you off, multiple times, he gets nexted. We aren’t here to teach men how to be decent.

[–]BCRE8TVEPurple Pill Man2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

It’s more the lack of trying. Everyone knows women need foreplay. Fucking everyone.

Yeah disagree. Sounds a bit like an assumption to me. It's a bit like saying that everyone knows that eating salty stuff makes you thirsty.

That's actually not true.

This "everyone knows women need foreplay" sounds to me like a seriously huge part of the problem right there, assuming guys know what foreplay is like, what kind of foreplay women like, how to initiate it, how long to go at it, and how to do it. It assumes guys know all this and deliberately choose not to.

Isn't it simpler to just think that perhaps they actually don't know this?

If you sleep with a man and he makes no effort to get you off, multiple times, he gets nexted.

Have you told them what it takes to get you off? If he makes no effort despite you telling him that's a pass for sure, but can't really assume he'll read your mind and figure out how to please you without you telling him.

We aren’t here to teach men how to be decent.

Isn't that a huge part of the problem tho? Imagine the next guy you meet, his previous girlfriend took the time to show him how. Wouldn't he therefore be better at pleasing you?

Shouldn't you be encouraging other women to teach their men how to get better at sex, so that increases the odds that the next guy you find has been taught better?

There seems to be a huge "it's not my fault therefore not my responsibility" kind of collective attitude. Well, just because it's not our fault doesn't mean it isn't our responsibility. Not my fault someone got beaten up or raped, but I'd still take it as my responsibility to prevent it. Not my fault that pollution is ruining the planet, but I'm still taking responsibility to try and make things better.

So, do you want to take responsibility and encourage others to take responsibility too, to tackle a problem that isn't your fault, but that you can make better?

[–]prunusamygdalis0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

No! It’s not “simpler” to assume that men are so goddamn dense that they don’t recognize that orgasm are good and people like them. They sure do spend a lot of time chasing them... because they already know. If a man doesn’t know what an orgasm looks like despite having one with every sexual experience he’d have to be dense as shit. The ONLY case I could see this is if the couple is young and the girl has been faking it, so he thinks what he’s doing (no foreplay jackhammering PiV usually) works. For an older experienced man there is no excuse. If you always “finish” sex and your partner didn’t have an apparent orgasm and this doesn’t spur you to figure out how to remedy this problem it’s not her responsibility to hold his hand and explain “i only have sex to reach orgasm like you. I too like orgasms. They tend to build and then crescendo, at which point I moan and move around in a very recognizable fashion.”

Where you did get it right: men who give af about their partners pleasure are great after the first relationship. The key is to find one of those, one who learned from his first GF. At my age, if he hasn’t had ANY LTR that is a major red flag anyway as I only date my age (30) or older and everyone has at least dated someone a year or two by now.

If I did somehow meet an awesome attractive dude who somehow never had a GF and wanted to learn how to please me... took initiative to try and learn I would 100% guide that experience because... I want to cum. So I would like him to learn how to do that haha. If I met a dude who, upon us sleeping together, showed 0 interest or concern over the fact that I did not cum I would just stop seeing him because nobody has time for that.

[–]BCRE8TVEPurple Pill Man0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

No! It’s not “simpler” to assume that men are so goddamn dense that they don’t recognize that orgasm are good and people like them. They sure do spend a lot of time chasing them... because they already know. If a man doesn’t know what an orgasm looks like despite having one with every sexual experience he’d have to be dense as shit.

It's not that men don't recognize that orgasms are good, it's in part that men are so goddamn dense maybe they don't recognize when their partners are actually having one, whether it's from her faking it, from her not screaming out loud, or just from him never really having seen women orgasm all that much.

You're completely missing the point here and thinking men are stupid because they act like they don't know that orgasms are good. That's not what this discussion is about, and you ought to know better.

A man knows what a man's orgasm looks like. You'll find men in general are far more confused about what a FEMALE orgasm looks like, and even less how to reliably cause them, which is the entire point.

The ONLY case I could see this is if the couple is young and the girl has been faking it, so he thinks what he’s doing (no foreplay jackhammering PiV usually) works.

Or, the guy doesn't know how to cause orgasms, so it's never really happened, AND no girl has ever showed him or taught him how to do it, so he really doesn't know what to do or how to do it, and therefore has never reliably seen female orgasms or knows how to cause them.

For an older experienced man there is no excuse.

That's awfully entitled isn't it? "You all ought to know better how to please me without me having to lift a finger to show you how." Well, perhaps you'd be having more orgasms if you actually took it upon yourself to actually show people how to give you what you want, you know? Men aren't magical mind-reading creatures who can just pluck from your mind how exactly to please you in the way you like best.

If you always “finish” sex and your partner didn’t have an apparent orgasm and this doesn’t spur you to figure out how to remedy this problem it’s not her responsibility to hold his hand and explain “i only have sex to reach orgasm like you. I too like orgasms. They tend to build and then crescendo, at which point I moan and move around in a very recognizable fashion.”

It's not her responsibility to show him how he didn't do it right? I'm sorry, but that's like saying that if you go to a dance class it's not your partner's job to show you how to dance better. They shouldn't have to tell you "I too like to dance and when I move my feet I want you to move your feet at the same time, but I'm not going to take the time and effort to tell you how to move your feet to dance well, I just expect you to know better without practice or instruction."

I mean come on, at least with dance classes a man can practice with other partners, but you can't do that with sex if literally none of your partners are willing to show you how and practice with you. Do you not understand that you are perpetuating the very problem that upsets you so much?

men who give af about their partners pleasure are great after the first relationship. The key is to find one of those, one who learned from his first GF.

So, a guy has exactly ONE CHANCE to learn, and after that if he hasn't learned, well too bad for him because nobody else will teach him and everyone else will just expect him to be great at sex without needing to lift a finger to give him instructions or practice?

I hope I misunderstood you, because that sounds incredibly entitled, expecting the guy to do everything right on the first shot without you having to do the slightest thing to get what you want.

If I did somehow meet an awesome attractive dude who somehow never had a GF and wanted to learn how to please me... took initiative to try and learn I would 100% guide that experience because... I want to cum. So I would like him to learn how to do that haha.

That's fantastic! Now take that attitude, and expand that to every guy you meet. Teach them how you want them to make love to you, and if they don't want to or try to learn, then dump them. Don't just magically expect them to be perfect in bed without you having to put any effort into the relationship, and then if they fail at reading your mind to please you dump them in search of that other magically perfect boyfriend who can satisfy you because he learned perfectly well from the first girl he ever had sex with.

If I met a dude who, upon us sleeping together, showed 0 interest or concern over the fact that I did not cum I would just stop seeing him because nobody has time for that.

0 interest or concern I agree that is a red flag, but are you even going to give them a chance to express that interest or concern? Are you going to try and talk to them to try and get them to ask? Or are you just going to expect that you're entitled to someone who cares and will take all the right steps on their own without you having to lift a single finger or say a single word about it?

[–]Creation_SoulPurple Pill Man6 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I read somewhere that men in LTRs are less likely than women to maintain platonic relationships with other people of the same sex and instead rely on going out with groups of other couples.

So there is a high chance that the women you were seeing out are not single at all, but just hanging out with other friends.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Possibly. I've chatted with some of them and went out with others. It seems fairly common.

[–]poppy_blublack midget wine mom 🍷38 points39 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

Dissatisfaction results when reality does not live up to our expectations.

Each of us has a choice to make in life:

  • be mad at reality for not living up to our expectations

  • accept reality and adjust our expectations

  • seek to improve ourselves/how we react to any given situation (because we will never be successful in changing others)

Ie, accept the things you can’t change and change the things you can

One of the most rewarding things about being middle aged is my life is half over. I ain’t got time for bullshit any more. My life got exponentially better when I stopped focusing on people and the world not meeting my expectations and focused on making the changes within myself to get what I wanted. Because otherwise you’re just a prisoner to the behaviors and actions of others.

Here’s a comically simple example: I can get mad that my H forgot to take out the trash. Or I can accept that he forgets things sometimes but is an otherwise wonderful husband and take the damn trash out myself.

To answer your question OP, the problem is not men, and the problem is not women. The problem is too many people who don’t want to accept reality and expect others to adjust to their expectations.

To be clear, I’m not saying people should accept abuse, manipulation, poor treatment, etc. In that case, adjusting your expectations is being willing to walk away and be single until you find better.

[–]beyond_relevant8 points9 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

One of the most rewarding things about being middle aged is my life is half over

What a sentence XD

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol.

[–]87AudreyHorne1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Beautiful

[–]poppy_blublack midget wine mom 🍷2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

So I'm making the best of the second half. Understand?

[–]i_cri_evry_tim4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Man I seldom agree with Poppy but that was just pure wisdom

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Pack it up everyone! Thread is clo-- kidding, but I like your answer.

[–]goneaway2thewind1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Best answer

[–]410136 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Having a lazy dude who never picks up after himself, plays video games and ignores you, can’t be bothered to socialize or plan outings, and is meh in bed is a net negative, no matter how much $$$ or other stuff he brings to the relationship. Juice, squeeze, you know the routine.

[–]Barneysparky5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I can speak for my demographic. Women my age and older are trending towards dating but keeping different households. I can't think of anyone I know in the past few years who have sold their homes to move in together. My own mom moved in with her guy, but has no plans to sell her own home 15 years ago.

The reasons are various for maintaining your own space, and often have nothing to do with opting out.

[–]redman3344 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah... and owning a house is also a good way to secure that money and make some additional by renting. It’s a common move for people who don’t know about the financial market, and that’s ok. I think that has nothing to do with what’s been asked here.

[–]diffdedbedGreen Eyed Devil4 points5 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

The problem with discussions like this is that there isn't real data presented and everyone gets to fit the assumption into their narrative.

When there is data, and it wouldn't surprise me if there is an increase, its often a few % or years different than the past and yet its trumpeted as a major shift that will change everything forever.

Lets take marriage ages, average was 20 in 1950 and 27 for women today. 7 years is a lot but in 1950 we were still getting over wars, travel was harder, and education more limited (and less necessary).

In this case you will get a lot of "oh women don't need men for money anymore" while you will see others on this site talking about how hard it is to make money as a millennial and the middle class dream is dead, and you NEED two full time incomes to survive (also bullshit but political motivated bullshit).

Basically this isn't really a discussion from facts, no one is ironmanning the opposition opinions, its just "I feel a thing and these are my strong opinions why based on my feelings on the subject, backed up by very limited to no data.".

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

I strongly considered getting some links/data to support the post but I didn't feel like it was necessary. If you're active in this community there's a good chance you've already seen the data. This question has been asked by many more eloquent and intelligent than me, with far more sources.

[–]diffdedbedGreen Eyed Devil2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

This question has been asked by many more eloquent and intelligent than me, with far more sources.

Ah, so why did you ask it then?

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

To hear another perspective on it maybe? And its come up more frequently in my personal life. I just like hearing people's thoughts on things.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Considering that the notoriously single, childless women above a certain age are considerably more likely to be well-educated, for them I assume it's a mix of

  • dissatisfaction with the options she has (oftentimes because of hypergamy as TRP defines it)
  • being overly cautious (basically too much FTO: instead of taking a chance, they postponed everything until they end up alone)
  • spending too much time on her career at the expense of her social life
  • alienating potential mates because her (in her eyes finest) qualities aren't necessarily a pull factor

[–][deleted]  (20 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]says_harsh_thingsRed Pill - Chad0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

Because Christmas cards with your cat are depressing

[–][deleted]  (4 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]says_harsh_thingsRed Pill - Chad0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Okay. You trying to convince me, or you?

[–][deleted]  (2 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]says_harsh_thingsRed Pill - Chad0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Yup. That ship has sailed long ago and it ain’t coming back.

Waves

[–]MuleFool42-1 points0 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

If there aren't enough good men to go around then yes, you don't have to compromise, but I sense that going it alone is not the first choice for a lot of women from OPs statement. So that means a portion of women will have to accept a sub optional lifestyle from how they thought they were going to live.

[–][deleted]  (12 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]MuleFool420 points1 point  (11 children) | Copy Link

If they're happy, there's no problem. We all have to learn to be happy when things don't go as planned.

[–][deleted]  (10 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]NarniaFox3 points4 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

A lot of people struggle to wrap their minds around this idea.

[–][deleted]  (3 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]NarniaFox2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm from Russia there are a lot of older women who can't imagine their lives without a man and they push younger girls to the same pattern.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah there are lost of articles written by single women complaining about their dating life, even thinking their career matters when any successful guy doesn’t care. The only one threaten are post-wall women writing articles about being the cool wine aunt.

[–]MuleFool420 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

I think that is going to be what happens more and more. Women choosing to get pregnant on their own and having families on their own as men become less and less interested in having families.

[–][deleted]  (3 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]MuleFool420 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

I think men are learning to be much happier on their own. Society has spoon fed them the idea that they can't be happy without women, but that is slowly changing.

"Women will get pregnant on their own if they really want it." That's fine, but they should really just buy sperm so that some man somewhere isn't forced into having a family that they don't want and can't afford, with a woman who doesn't love him or would ever marry him. Best to make it official so that everyone knows she's going it alone. Taking away a man's reproductive rights is just malicious and cruel.

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]MuleFool420 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

No, that's the message that society has fed women.

While I agree, this doesn't change that men were fed the same lie. As a man I can tell you that never, and I mean never, was the prevailing attitude conveyed to us that we should all be perennial bachelors. That is completely false. But I do agree that more men should take that route.

[–]Notsonewguy7Purple Pill Man4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The relationship was never based of a love for either party it was always a relationship of necessary convenience and or lust. With lust being much easier to satisfy the only thing left is convenience. For some relationships are no longer convenient or I should say as beneficial as it once was, for some.

The desire to couple up is there but instincts that push one to do that are satisfied. One can eat, feel secure, and have sex without any commitment. The relationship is not necessary and both parties are realizing it was never really that special to begin with.

But women like men are egotistical and while they can see the fault in others ignore the ones in themselves. This has created a narrative from both genders that the "failure" of modern relationships are based on some fault of the other party.

The the reality is men and women are not special.

[–]87AudreyHorne4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Anecdotally speaking I dont see this so much as just women who have relationships and then those relationships eventually breaking until the next one after a certain phase of being single.

What I can tell though is that most women I know in their 30ies arent worried about marriage or devastated if a relationship (even a good one) didnt work out. I know a few people who went through a break up just recently for different reasons and they're not stilling their wrists.

I think it's a generational thing and not a women thing but we all know marriages and relationships can break and we all know we can be just fine by ourselves, so if things arent working out a self respecting/sane person doesnt desperately cling on to it even if it's hard.

I think more single/dating/not super committed women are relieved they're not married or having kids than depressed about why they dont have those things yet at least from what I can see (despite some popular beliefs on this sub)

[–]Wallstreet38 points9 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Why are women dissatisfied? Because nothing or no one is good enough. They will always be unhappy.

[–]Teflon081912 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The Fisherman And His Wife. A timeless parable that all too many men have forgotten.

Nature has a funny way of sorting this stuff out in due time though. Sit back and enjoy the ride.

[–]Chandira1434 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

People in relationships get unhappy and they seek to place blame on whoever they’re with instead of turning inward. Life is hard. Aging is hard. You can’t recapture the spark of youth and there are seasons in a marriage. Both sexes do this - and this leads to a lot of infidelity.

I am a woman and I get unhappy but I am ALWAYS grateful for my partner. 10 plus years.

[–]ifelsedowhilelocal cop - cherry top12 points13 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

because they no longer need a beta provider and they find only a moderate attraction at best for betas. so they rather stay single and resort to high quality sperm donor in case they want kids.

[–]Willow-girlNot much to start with and worse for the wear12 points13 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

It's the economy, particularly in the working class. In the old days, men were still a PITA, but they brought home a paycheck that kinda made up for it. The compromise was acceptable. Nowadays, few men can support a family, and lots are a net drain on a woman's energy and finances. I doubt most of these soyboys raised by single mothers even know how to change the oil in her car or get her lawnmower running!

[–]reluctantly_red3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I doubt most of these soyboys raised by single mothers even know how to change the oil in her car or get her lawnmower running!

My little brother used to pretend he couldn't do this type of stuff so I'd have to do it. Didn't matter he still still got more attention from women because he was better looking.

Back in the old days I'd pour the used oiled oil from the cars trucks and farm machinery on the dirt driveway to keep the dust down. Can't do shit like that anymore.

[–]says_harsh_thingsRed Pill - Chad0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I doubt most of these soyboys raised by single mothers even know how to change the oil in her car or get her lawnmower running!

Shes a proud independent strong woman. She doesnt need me to do it.

[–]richlad0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I doubt most of these soyboys raised by single mothers even know how to change the oil in her car or get her lawnmower running!

Irony is half of the jobs have been lost to women in the first place.

Either you can demand equality or you can demand "financially stronger men". Why ask for both?

[–]Willow-girlNot much to start with and worse for the wear1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because we can?

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

If they are getting support from the government they are not going their own way.

Somehow women have come up with the idea that men hate them ( men are hard wired to like women) so they hate men.

Honestly. I wish all women would go their own way and stay away from men. Stop stealing from men. Stop selling nudes on Instagram and just do it. Form lesbian communes etc. Everyone will be happy

[–]SocietalEngineering2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Modern society has taken the BB out of the AF/BB equation. The government and feminism now supply enough resources to safely ignore the beta providers.

Women just share the Alphas for their sexual needs, and that’s that. Everything taken care of.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s not men, there was a great selection of men 5 yrs ago on OLD and I make new friends easily. IRL 3 yrs ago there were men who thought the world of me and were down for serious or whatever I wanted.

The porn thing started getting in the way of relationships for me for a maybe unexpected reason from 08-15 when high speed internet porn really took off. I had been using in it a relationship when I was being sexually neglected (cheated on) and then after when I was single and dating, but successfully quit. Decided I wanted to give all my sexual energy to one person.

Ofc the next guy I was seeing was really into porn but was also dating around, so I was trying to date around, too, which didn’t work, and I never knew when I’d see him so I started using porn again, incorporating it into our text flirtation and sex. It just sucks how much a part of everyone’s daily life it seems porn is. Kind of like social drinking. You hope someone grows out of it but some people won’t/don’t. It’s like couples are still fucking but also The Blob (internet porn) is an integral part of almost everyone’s sexuality now. I definitely would never date anyone who says they’d never give up porn and freaks out at the suggestion.

I want to stress though that it’s not men- it’s me. If I get a crush I might change my mind, but looking for a man to fill a position in my life is not even on my list of priorities.

[–]SerpentCypher10 points11 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

Well this is ever so predictable.

Men- Problem is women, standards too high while not being "all that" themselves.

Women- Problem is men. Men are shit, want women as sex slave mommy wives and women are being emancipated because they deserve better.

[–]Sir_manalot8 points9 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

This entire thread is bs lol.

Men have a point as they have data to back up there POV (ex: okcupid data).

While women’s problem doesn’t even make sense. If men wanted sex slaves, feminism wouldn’t exist, men wouldn’t want to get married, tons of men are the exact opposite of what they complain about (ex: male feminists) but they purposefully go out of there way to chase the type of men they complain about.

Op has no data. If anything, the data shows that men are withdrawing and women are the ones saying “you cannot fire me, I quit.”

Just look at how small wgtow is compared to mgtow. You can say mgtow is fake (it isn’t), but that doesn’t matter when wgtow is so small in comparison.

[–]Barneysparky12 points13 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Dude. Life is not reddit. You dont have to subscribe to a sub to be doing something.

If my husband passed there is no way I'd enter into a sexual relationship again.

Of the women my age who are dating in my social circle they are not moving in together. My own mother has been with a lovely man for 15 years and still maintains her own home.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Dude. Life is not reddit. You dont have to subscribe to a sub to be doing something.

Exactly! Hence me not meaning WGTOW in a literal pill type of way. He needs to go outside.

[–]Sir_manalot-3 points-2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

And?

[–]Jathrowaway978 points9 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

It’s because most wgtow don’t label themselves as that. They just do it and don’t talk about it unless you ask.

[–]Sir_manalot2 points3 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

And most mgtow men do the same in public.

There are not all that many wgtow, people just want to shit on mgtow.

[–]Jathrowaway976 points7 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Key word: “in public”. They go online and have created a name, forum and YouTube channels to talk all about it.

Women don’t do that. Most don’t label themselves as wgtow in public or online. They just live the life.

That’s a very self-centered view. For decades there have always been men and women who either choose not to have a partner or who can’t get one. We’re more aware of the men who are this way by choice. Acknowledging the women who are also like this by choice isn’t “sh*tting on mgtow”.

[–]Sir_manalot-1 points0 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Are you kidding me?

Women bitch about men all the damn time and nobody cares.

But if a man says even one bad thing about women, even if it is completely justified, they are being filled with pure hatred.

You can circle jerk hate mgtow all you want and hamster any empty excuse you can to justify it. But the more people hate on mgtow, the bigger it will get.

Because every once of hate aimed at mgtow proves mgtow righr about everything.

So keep the hypocrisy going.

[–]Jathrowaway972 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Complaining about dating and being married when you’re actively a part of it and discussing your journey of choosing to be single and childfree are two different things.

I was referring to the latter when I said women don’t make forums or say anything on or offline. If that wasn’t clear I apologize. Women who choose to not get married or have children typically do so in silence unlike their recent male counterparts. I have my guesses on why. Most of them don’t label themselves, most don’t identify with the WGTOW label, they don’t have a move to and they rarely are online talking about their decision to be childfree and perpetually unmarried unless someone asks. For the most part they just choose to remain childfree and unmarried and don’t explain unless someone asks them why they don’t have a husband or kids or if they have any plans to have a husband or kids.

Thank you for letting me know that mgtow is just about men complaining about women though. I thought there was more to it.

False. Depending on who hears the person who says a bad thing about men/women will either be cheered on or accused of being a misogynist/misandrist.

No one is hating on MGTOW. Most people don’t know much or care about it. You seem to want that to be the case for whatever reason. So good luck?

Every once what? There’s no hate or hypocrisy here. That’s your business.

[–]Sir_manalot0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Complaining about dating and being married when you’re actively a part of it and discussing your journey of choosing to be single and childfree are two different things.

What? Men are hated on when they complain about dating and marriage no matter what they are doing.

I was referring to the latter when I said women don’t make forums or say anything on or offline. If that wasn’t clear I apologize. Women who choose to not get married or have children typically do so in silence unlike their recent male counterparts.

That isn’t true at all. Look up women marrying themselves on google or any of the many articles about women bragging about being single.

Women who are going wgtow are very vocal about it, they are just small in numbers. If they weren’t, it would be a big deal to society as society wants children.

Thank you for letting me know that mgtow is just about men complaining about women though. I thought there was more to it.

Blatantly lying by twisting what I said is a very shitty thing to do.

False. Depending on who hears the person who says a bad thing about men/women will either be cheered on or accused of being a misogynist/misandrist.

That just isn’t true. Besides places like mgtow, nobody cares if women are being misandrist.

No one is hating on MGTOW. Most people don’t know much or care about it. You seem to want that to be the case for whatever reason. So good luck?

This entire thread is an attempt to hate on mgtow. And you are hating on mgtow yourself. Gaslighting doesn’t work on me.

Every once what? There’s no hate or hypocrisy here. That’s your business.

This entire thread is hypocrisy.

[–]Jathrowaway971 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

So are women they’re called man hating misandrists fueling the war on masculinity.

They’re not that small in number. They’ve always been around and they will continue to grow. They just don’t talk about it as much as men for various reasons. Partially because being a bachelor is cool while being a spinster is shameful and sad, the reasons behind their choice are different than men’s etc.

The birth rates are declining and I don’t think this is wholly due to men’s choices.

You said it not me. I was talking about men and women who choose not to pair off and/or have kids. Then you started going on about people who complain about the opposite gender. What conclusion should I have drawn from that? Either you were confused or you were projecting.

It is true. Just look up articles about masculinity being attacked, Rise of misandry etc. The women who say these things don’t care and I suspect that’s what men want. They want misandrist women to care about their misandry and until then it doesn’t matter how many centrist or tradcon women and how many men call out misandrist women.

This thread isn’t hating on mgtow. You were the one that brought it up and lauded that accusation with no proof. This whole thread is about why there seems to be more women opting to stay single and just cultivate platonic relationships.

This entire thread is not hypocritical or hateful.

[–][deleted]  (2 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]Sir_manalot2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because they think women are weak objects that are incapable of doing anything. Like how a baby does something stupid “awwwww how cute.”

But if men complain about something, they have the power to change it.

[–]Jathrowaway970 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Those women complain about guys they’re actively dating or men they’re married to. They’re not women who are choosing to be single by choice.

I seldom ever see women online saying they’re checking out of dating all together and encouraging other women to do the same. If they make that choice they just do it and live their life. If someone asks them why they don’t have a husband or kids they’ll explain themselves but otherwise they don’t say anything on or offline.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly.

[–]Gravel_RoadsJust a Pill1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep.

[–]acenosk11 points12 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

Because they fail to secure a Chad and then get bitter and give up.

Every woman gets a taste of Chad now, but they can't all keep him. After they get a taste they can't go back to billy beta.

[–][deleted]  (7 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]wtknightGen X Slacker2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

But the point is that they’re not satisfied with Billy, not that they can’t hide their pasts with Chad from him.

[–]Joey_Lopez0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Betas are learning game and wising up. It's the beta male revolution. Which is part of the reason women are angry at men today. A lot of them were riding the CC and now they are having trouble finding a beta to save them.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

What...? Betas are not rising up, and women are not scared of them rising up. No one in the real world even talks like this.

[–]boomcheese441 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

IKR? lol

[–]richlad-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Billy beta won't know shit

Billy beta these days is smart and often a closet gay/bi sexual man, keeps woman around for status. Think about life as a woman with gay man.

[–]Orange_PaisleyOrange pill is best pill5 points6 points  (23 children) | Copy Link

Because we do not have to settle for a subpar man when we can have a career, form a social circle, pursue sexual relationships, and even raise kids without weighing ourselves down with an albatross who has nothing to offer and in fact detracts from our life quality. Women already do most of the housework and child rearing and we are catching up and even surpassing men in education and earnings. Not saying all men are subpar - far from it - but it isn’t worth settling for the ones that are anymore. An educated single mom with a good career has more status than a high school educated married waitress.

[–]Physiologist21Cynic3 points4 points  (17 children) | Copy Link

"we" have an astonishing large amount of clinical level depression, anxiety, and narcissism. It's almost like feminism sold women a lie, almost like biology always wins in the end.

[–]Orange_PaisleyOrange pill is best pill4 points5 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

Equality is not a lie no matter how desperately men wish it were.

[–]Physiologist21Cynic4 points5 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

Equality is a lie, it's a lie in society for a million reasons and it will always be a life because you cannot make things equal aside from literal eugenics and gene manipulation. People are born better than you. This is painfully obvious, who the fuck are you kidding lol.

Also I have no idea what you are referring to, just dance over that point I made, no problem ;)

[–]Orange_PaisleyOrange pill is best pill0 points1 point  (10 children) | Copy Link

I'm talking about equal under the law, I have no idea what you are babbling about.

[–]Physiologist21Cynic2 points3 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

Yes sure technically we are equal under the law, though not really. We all have the same rights in theory but none the less we all have vastly different genes. So actually equality will never exist. I have no idea what you are babbling about as I didn't say anything that had to do with equality to begin with.

[–]Orange_PaisleyOrange pill is best pill2 points3 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

Equality is a lie

You said equality is a lie, so yes you did say something that had to do with equality. You were just wrong, again.

[–]Physiologist21Cynic0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy Link

That wasn't my first comment....it was a response to yours seeing as you just dodged mine. Evidently don't like acknowledging reality, which is fine. Please don't be intentionally stupid =).

[–]Orange_PaisleyOrange pill is best pill1 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Not groveling before you and agreeing with your every word is not intentional stupidity, it's intentional skepticism. You should try it, it comes in handy.

[–]Physiologist21Cynic0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

Again, not living in reality. Let's try this again...

Did you know that most women who are over 30+ without a husband, regardless or whether they have kids or not (almost 0 significant difference) have extremely high rates of clinical depression, anxiety or narcissism and an extremely high rate of cross over between 2 or 3 out of 3 of those compared to those who don't. Like deviations of difference.

Also interestingly enough these diagnosis are higher in severity in women who are career oriented, which is to say, those who pursued career over relationships show larger maladaptations then those who are single but do not have high stress jobs or work many hours.

Feminism does not help anyone, it only ruins people with lies about biology. There are an extremely small set of women who are going to be happy trying to chase traditional male happiness (high powered job/status).

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Depression and Anxiety are higher for women because of the way our brains are wired, not because of lifestyle choices. And narcissism is much higher in men, FYI.

[–]Physiologist21Cynic1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Yes that is exactly why you are wired differently, sort of, which is why the choices you make affect you differently then a man making the same choice. What are you even talking about "not because of lifestyle choices"... every choice you make affects your psyche. Narcissism in the general population of men at all ages in studies done before 2015, is indeed slightly higher but also not what I said. Although the methodology is kind of shotty based on what we know now about trait psychology. For example you might conclude I am more narcissistic based on my post history, but really it's just because most people don't have a clue what the fuck they are talking about =).

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

What are you even talking about "not because of lifestyle choices"... every choice you make affects your psyche.

A lot of depression and psych issues are inherited, and some (like PTSD) are inflicted on you after a traumatic event. A woman with major anxiety issues or depression might be making safer or less risky choices, and a woman with BPD might be taking risks and driving off cliffs. But what came first, the disorder or the behavior?

[–]richlad-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

and a woman with BPD might be taking risks and driving off cliffs. But what came first, the disorder or the behavior?

It's not as obvious you make believe.

People with BPD might have created more like them by inflicting pain and suffering onto others. BPD can induce PTSD in their partners, it's documented in psychology literature.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

It’s okay, I’m sure whatever left-wing publications are left in 4 years will allow you to write articles about how society doesn’t do enough for single moms.

An educated single mom with a good career has more status than a high school educated married waitress. And a young mom married to a doctor/lawyer/engineer is happier than an old lady trying to fool herself.

[–]Orange_PaisleyOrange pill is best pill2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Nah, I already raised my babies and am pretty content to enjoy my 40s not chasing kids around or driving them to school.

[–]Andress10 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Subpar men... you mean bottom 80% in looks.

[–]Orange_PaisleyOrange pill is best pill1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

No, I mean marginally employed manbabies who would rather play video games than be responsible adults.

[–]Andress1-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I barely see any of those. Im 26 and im surrounded by average guys, alot of them engineers, gainfully employed with good salaries but barely any dating life. The only ones that have options are good-looking. It's always the same pattern. Good to very good face, and at least an average body.

[–]Teflon081912 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Both genders are dissatisfied with one another and both are basically playing chicken to see who needs the other the least.

I do find it fascinating though how all of these concepts always seem to begin as male philosophies (TRP, MGTOW) which then get hastily adapted into female equivalents (FDS, WGTOW).

[–]ElGupo19782 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The average man can not afford to bankroll a woman’s projected lifestyle, not enough 7 figure guys to go around

[–][deleted]  (3 children) | Copy Link

[removed]

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS[M] -1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Satirical answers go to the automod.

[–]passepar2ttreats objects like women0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Satirical? Who says? I mean it.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

cause toujours tu m'intéresses

[–]MuleFool421 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Whenever I go out I see at least one or more tables that have just women. So I see what you're seeing. I think men do the same thing, they're just out golfing or fishing or something. So it may just be something that has always been there.

[–]Zippo-Cat1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Women only find top 10-30% of men attractive. But monogamy forces them into relationships with unattractive men.

How fucking hard is this to figure out.

[–]zerofeetpersecond0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

The ancient powers that be literally invented monogamy to stop men from being animals.

[–]Zippo-Cat0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Do you... realize how retarded that sounds? I guess you don't. Which makes it even more sad lmao

[–]abaxeron✴️Indian Programmer1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Anecdotally and based on data, more women are "opting out" of relationships and staying single.

More than who? Men? Or women historically? - I dug some data back in my day, and it very much depends on the region. Early, almost mandatory marriages somehow came "back into fashion" around post-WW2 period, worldwide; a lot of what we're seeing now is just trends bouncing back to historical norms.

[–]nosynobodyPurple Pill Woman6 points7 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Cos women have improved and evolved while a majority of men stayed the same. They want the freedom of having a sexually liberated society yet want a gf wife who does all the housework. Women have come upon the realization that it's better to opt out than stay in unhappy situations.

[–]giorgi0003 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Wasn't the sexually liberated society a feminist goal?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Yes it was, but many people imagined that meant equal-opportunity orgies with unpicky women who would bang them and that did not happen outside the hippie commune.

[–]giorgi0000 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Who? Feminism movement promoted casual sex and body exhibition, many men are happy of that

[–]DangZagnut2 points3 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

MGTOW bad, WGTOW good.

Yeah. Makes perfect sense. That’s not in any way an agenda there.

Who cares why women don’t like men. Good for them. I wish they’d all opt out, but it seems a vast majority of women want that money, which is the only reason women waste time with men anyway.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

I wish they’d all opt out, but it seems a vast majority of women want that money, which is the only reason women waste time with men anyway.

Drop the bitterness, it is not helping you.

[–]DangZagnut0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

How is that bitter?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Women only waste time with men in hopes of snagging some dough? You don't see the bitterness in such a thought process? Also incorrect- many women love men for themselves.

[–]DangZagnut0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Women have lovers because they like them, I’ve had plenty of those. Women do not form relationships unless there’s a return on that investment. 98% financial.

I know, I know, you’ll say not all women do that. Ok. Sure. But women don’t get married to pay for everything and lose everything she’s worked for in a divorce to take care of and support someone.

Exceptions prove the rule.

Bitter would imply I care. I’m just pointing out reality. I have zero interest in marriage, and this isn’t why, just a fact.

You just think it’s bitter because that reality doesn’t appeal to you or you feel offended by it.

Again, I don’t care. It has zero effect on me because marriage is for stupid people, and I just have one IQ point over the line to not jump into stupid things.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

marriage is for stupid people, and I just have one IQ point over the line to not jump into stupid things.

Dude, I am not even married and you sound like a sour-grape-ist. Stupid people, really? Being so smart makes people eschew marriage? Come on. Just admit that you are a jagged pill.

[–]DangZagnut0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

You’d love that, because your only go to is “bitter I fell because you can’t refute anything.

It’s ok, that’s all you can do.

“Must be sour grapes”. All the standard quotes.

Marriage is for stupid men and greedy women. Don’t hate the player hate the game.

As someone with wealth and his own greed, I have zero interest in paying for someone’s life and to lose it through no fault of my own.

I don’t believe in asymmetrical contracts. I don’t do them in business and certainly don’t do it in relationships.

A lover? That was fine in the past, but I don’t need those kind of liabilities in my life.

Marry all the women you want. I’m sure there’s a zero percent chance it’ll ever end up a problem across a dozen vectors.

So I will say “stupid” is the wrong word. “Ignorant” would be a more appropriate one.

Marriage is for ignorant men.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] -1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

MGTOW bad, WGTOW good.

I hate both of these communities so I dont know how you came to this conclusion.

Yeah. Makes perfect sense. That’s not in any way an agenda there.

Nah, just you projecting.

Who cares why women don’t like men. Good for them. I wish they’d all opt out, but it seems a vast majority of women want that money, which is the only reason women waste time with men anyway.

Some. Others are very self reliant.

[–]DangZagnut2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

No, you said MGTOW is crap, then wondered why WGTOW was a thing and that they’re dissatisfied with men.

Because you never implied wgtow was crap.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I just said it was. There you go.

[–]gimpgirl555Pick Me3 points4 points  (19 children) | Copy Link

Anecdotally and based on data, more women are "opting out" of relationships and staying single.

Yeah, totally, just like more men are "opting out" of sex. It's not that they can't get boyfriends to save their lives, they just don't want them.

Instead, they are cultivating platonic relationships with friends and using that as a substitute for romance.

And then they try to steal each other's men.

Which begs the question: Why are so many women dissatisfied with men?

Because men are not giving them free stuff. And they were led to believe that they would be dating rich and handsome guys who are also gourmet chefs.

Is this a problem with women or men? Are women standards too high? Are most men bad partners? Why is the average women uninterested in the average man?

Because the average woman is holding out for Christian Grey, or Mr Darcy, or the Witcher.

[–]xXxINCELFAGGOTxXxIt is what it is5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because the average woman is holding out for Christian Grey, or Mr Darcy, or the Witcher.

Pretty much every woman I know.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

I don't think that's necessarily the case, the primary reason is because many women were not socialized to place much of any value in monogamy, relationships, marriage and men in general. Even if a guy looks like Henry Cavil, many women don't care.

The primary reason any of this mgtard, redpill, blackpill, inkel, foreveralone, bluepill, PUA, exist is because many women are simply not interested. They don't want men, they don't need men, they don't want to be bothered by men, they're just not that interested.

[–]gimpgirl555Pick Me2 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

the primary reason is because many women were not socialized to place much of any value in monogamy, relationships, marriage and men in general. Even if a guy looks like Henry Cavil, many women don't care.

Women were told that if they got an education and a career they'd get a rich guy.

And also to wait until 30 to get married (lol), cuz then they'd get a rich guy.

They don't want men, they don't need men, they don't want to be bothered by men, they're just not that interested.

Do you see Stacies talking about how they don't want men?

Here's an example, do you see these women talking about how they don't need men? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3313621/Husbands-boyfriends-Victoria-s-Secret-Angels-models-revealed.html

they could all choose to live alone with their cats, but none of them did.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I don't know why you're using examples of millionaires and their opulent lifestyles to make a point?

These people have zero in common with 90% of men and women.

[–]gimpgirl555Pick Me2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Because those women are reasonably attractive, they get lots of attention, they have their own money, they don't need men. Yet all of them got men. That proves that successful women, who have options, don't choose to be alone. Being alone is for losers.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah but the continuous of those women's careers and celebrity status is contingent on their relations and connections with others. You think the woman who's with the Maroon 5 fellow isn't getting invited to additional fancy parties with high up Hollywood folk since she started dating him? You cannot compare those people to regular people.

Regular women aren't literal supermodels who are dating rockstars.

[–]gimpgirl555Pick Me4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

If you're pretty as a woman you always get invited to events, you don't need to date a guy for it.

If regular women looked like "supermodels" they would still get with men. It's only ugly or crazy women who choose to be alone.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (11 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, totally, just like more men are "opting out" of sex. It's not that they can't get boyfriends to save their lives, they just don't want them.

If they didn't want them, they wouldn't be passively searching for one. I think they still want a dream relationship but it's not worth putting too much effort into it.

And then they try to steal each other's men.

No.

Because men are not giving them free stuff.

True.

Because the average woman is holding out for Christian Grey, or Mr Darcy, or the Witcher.

Basically.

[–]gimpgirl555Pick Me1 point2 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

If they didn't want them, they wouldn't be passively searching for one. I think they still want a dream relationship but it's not worth putting too much effort into it.

That's just something women say. In reality they're desperate.

No.

If you have two women, and one of them gets a boyfriend, her friend will try to steal him.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

If you have two women, and one of them gets a boyfriend, her friend will try to steal him.

Most people have different tastes and their bestie's boyfriend is NOT hot to them. There is little poaching because he is Ew.

[–]gimpgirl555Pick Me1 point2 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

IME women will try to steal each other's boyfriends because women are very jealous. It doesn't have to do with that they like the guy, women just want to ruin it for each other.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Uh, I never see this. My gal pals have gross men because I like a different type and I would never want their dorky husbands or boyfriends anyway.

[–]gimpgirl555Pick Me0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

But if you didn't have a boyfriend, if you felt that your boyfriend was somehow worse, or you felt that they were happy with their men, you might feel different. It's a female on female jealousy thing.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

If I did not have a man of my own why would I need to snare someone else's mate? Plenty of good looking single men.

[–]gimpgirl555Pick Me1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Because women want what other women have, and because if another woman picked a guy there's gotta be something good about him,

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3687062/The-eight-reasons-90-women-fall-MARRIED-man.html

https://www.fatherly.com/health-science/science-of-why-women-are-attracted-to-married-men/

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Maybe you live someplace where this happens but I never see it here.

[–]PollaTronante0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I feel sorry for you if this is the kind of female company you keep.

[–][deleted]  (9 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]Jathrowaway979 points10 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Women who actually call themselves wgtow sure. However there’s always been women who either prefer to stay perpetually single or who were perpetually single for other reasons. They just never gave themselves a name.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This right here chief.

[–]InterestingStorm76 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Spinsters predate MGTOW and their internet movement. Immaturity is not an argument.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Nope, wgtow came well before mgtow. Women were the original demographic that pushed the, "I'm a single independent woman who doesn't need no man and I'm going to do my own thing" narrative.

[–][deleted]  (4 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]Bright_ItempasBlue Pill Woman5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This is so ahistorical, dude. Women, especially upper class and landed women, have foregone marriage throughout history.

Banananut mentions the Mary Tyler Moore show, but it happened in history even before TV. Check out Boston marriages, for example. UC and landed women whose husbands died also didn't necessarily remarry, because property laws would mean that she'd lose ownership to the new husband.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

The acronym "wgtow" may have come after mgtow but, the concept of wgtow came well before mgtow was even a thing. The whole wgtow shit started to gain fruition around the time of the Mary Tyler Moore show, which was decades ago.

Also, mgtow does not exist. Men aren't going their own way. There's not much left to go your own way from. Many women are simply not interested in monogamy, relationships and or much of anything to do with men.

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, you're on the internet. Besides a few forums and circlejerk youtube videos, mgtow doesn't exist. Men aren't going their own way, legions of men will be sent their own way. Many women don't want men, they don't need men, they don't care to be bothered by men. This isn't the 1960s where men need to "avoid" marriage and relationships, odds are they're going to come across many women who were never interested from the get go. Women don't care, there's not much left to go your own way from.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I think women are simply more affected by modern media and have expectations a lot of men can't live up to.

[–]zerofeetpersecond-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

As a guy who is 6’2” I can credibly tell you my female friends think 6’ is average. Things are out of control and denying it is the last great shit test.

[–]AutoModeratorMarried to MRS_DRgree[M] 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Attention!

  • You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.

  • For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.

  • If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.

  • OP you can choose your own flair according to these guidelines., just press Flair under your post!

Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]goneaway2thewind0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Here we go again

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Hm?

[–]goneaway2thewind1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

You ever notice how women complain about a patriarchy and equal rights while simultaneously complaining that men aren't making more than them? It just gets annoying to me after awhile.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, I get that. Its exhausting to deal with.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

There is less incentive to 'make do' or settle now. Not long ago you were expected to be settled down by 30 or younger than that, and you were largely restricted with who you met. You can reasonably expect a limitless number of suitors and there is little pressure beyond your own biology to settle down.

[–]NeedingAdvice860 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I travel quite a bit and so eat out at cafes and bar quite a bit as a solo....

First....I do see the packs of single women BUT reality that it is obvious that MOST of them are not choosing to be single by choice...that is your first mistake or lie. Giving the impression that these are packs of hot, success swimsuit model females who have given up on men. Hardly, they are almost exclusively less than prizes themselves....see weight issues, not particularly attractive, etc. In most cases, I suspect that it is mutual at best or just as likely that they aren't getting many offers for romance or dating to reject.

2nd.....it is selection bias.....single men don't go to the places you are seeing these packs of women...single men tend to congregate at other places than in a café, bar, restaurant for dinner on a Saturday night. If you went to a golf club or a sporting event, then you would see mostly men in groups drinking beer, socializing and etc along with very few groups of single women.

Truth is that there is a growing singleness or loneliness problem among all people because people are becoming less social and more isolated behind their phones and online internet avenues rather than going out to places and events.

[–][deleted]  (2 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Migtoes are the ones still obsessed with skirt chasing after they pretend to go away. Women who are over dating actually stop dating.

The D is not that good.

[–]OpdatUweKutSchimmeleOnly takes sleeping pills0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Anecdotally and based on data, more women are "opting out" of relationships and staying single. Instead, they are cultivating platonic relationships with friends and using that as a substitute for romance. This is something I've personally observed a lot. Whenever I did romantic activities with my girlfriend, there would be a group of women out together.

Yes, I've recently indeed noticed that I effectively do this; I never made a bold statement or some political movement out of it; this is just wht I do.

Which begs the question: Why are so many women dissatisfied with men?

I am not dissatisfied with any particular gender in that sense and I think here lies the problematic assumption.

I am simply not interested in the entire concept of a "life partnership", and I think many more individuals are not.

I never even "quit" relationships; I have been single all my life; it was just never something that held my interest or I specifically looked out for. I'm not "aromantic" or whatever; life-partnerships just don't hold my interest; I'm perfectly capable of running my life alone.

Is this a problem with women or men? Are women standards too high? Are most men bad partners? Why is the average women uninterested in the average man?

Again, you make it too gendered I feel; gender has nothing to do with it for many.

[–]superbungiechairPurple Pill Woman0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I just think that the popularity of a conventional “lifestyle” as a whole is decreasing. Dating, getting married, having children, etc. Personally, I just don’t find a need in dating lol. I love someone, but if they don’t love me back then I’m fine. I’ve been seeing more people feel like dating isn’t important, too. It’s not that men are dissatisfactory, it’s more like there’s just not a need for having a partner and being an independent individual is a whole lot better.

[–]KazROFL0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

The only true WGTOW are women who don't have kids and are choosing to be single. The rest are WSTOW.

Many suffer under the delusion that they can become a mother all by themselves and do a decent job, these are not WGTOW. These are desperate women who will poorly raise a kid to satisfy their narcissism.

[–]goatismycopilotcatladycatladycatlady🐐🐐🐐🐐0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

They are more indifferent. Now that they do not have to marry loser guys and pop out baby people just to survive many don't.

[–]zerofeetpersecond1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Except now they are having kids unmarried with even bigger unemployed losers.

[–]Pastelitomaracucho0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

A combination of standards being high and men checking out and not interested in meeting those standards.

[–]Iron-Giant1690 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

80/20 rule is in effect

[–]_lexxxi_980 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because we try so hard to be the perfect girl for these guys and its almost never enough. I literally have went every direction to please my boyfriend and he still looks for something different. You can only try so hard for people when enough is enough. Why do I have to keep putting myself out there for you when you aren't doing anything for me? If I can change the way I look, flirt more, and any other thing you ask, then why you can't you put some effort in? Us women are being shoved away by men and expected to come back from that and learn something. Be better than before, and it's getting old. Yes I love my boyfriend and want him to be happy but when do my feelings and what not come into play??

[–]AccomplishedPumpkin30 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

IMO, theres nothing wrong with having standards that are very high, even if it is unlikely you'll ever find a partner. Thats your choice. If you want to find a partner, its important to be realistic about your options, what you can offer, what a potential partner can offer, whether or not a relationship and the responsibilities that come with a relationship are worth it, if being single is better than lowering your requirements, etc. If you come to the conclusion that being single and never dating men/women is right for you, go for it.

[–]DubsPackage0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Who cares.

MGTOW don't care if you like them, and WGTOW can go fuck off too.

Women are dissatisfied? Women have been dissatisfied since the beginning of time, I don't think I've ever met a jolly woman in my entire life.

That being said, alot of women in modern times are dissatisfied because they have to work full-time in a corporation and still try to live up to female gender roles from a time when women had alot more free-time, alot of women feel like they're getting ripped off (and they are.)

Not by men, but by the ruling classes, we're all getting ripped off.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Women like to socialize and travel in packs like any other herd animal. While they are bitching about men at the mall, guys are at home bitching about them to their online gaming buddies in between fap sessions.

There is no actual qualitative difference between these two groups. Their war of words to determine who is REALLY Gtowing just proves they both arent.

[–]WIA20XX0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

WGTOW is very small compared to FDS.

But to answer your question, there has never been a time where they have been satisfied.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm not talking about either of those.

[–]DXBrigade-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Both are dead subs.

[–]bonusfruit0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

There is no wgtow. Not with the entirety of mainstream media, academia, the government and popular culture behind them

[–]tomo58070 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because nothing can please a woman.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

A lot of women have only had negative experiences with men. A lot of guys are manipulative, pushy, and cruel toward women. Or are only interested in sex and not a relationship.

Some people get sick of trying, and find their own happiness being single.

[–]taapy234RED2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

A lot of women have only had negative experiences with men. A lot of guys are manipulative, pushy, and cruel toward women. Or are only interested in sex and not a relationship.

Its only because women LIKE manipulative, pushy and cruel men. The problem for women is they are HOPING, PRAYING even that they will tame these manipulative, pushy and cruel men and keep him in her pocket. Which is not really happens in reality.

Which is why women seem to absolutely hate women now and are openly being misandrist as a result.

Like a wife beater literally beating his wife everyday because people at work shits at him, women are lashing out at innocent men who try to be accodomating because chads don't want to commit to them.

The vicious cycle continues.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Physiologist21Cynic0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

All garbage research, but the overall sentiment is still correct.

[–]thedeadpillJaded Misanthropic Data-Peddler0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't have any data for this one, but in the leftist circles I've hung out in, many of them are just of the blanket mind "man bad". They can't even envision what a 'good' man is to them, and find fault with anyone they end up with.

In the right-wing circles I've been in, most of them just can't find a man that's traditional enough.

Eventually, they give up.

I can't say much about centrists, except that they seem to be happiest.

[–]vicistvicNo Pill-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Men are impure sexual libertines. They stink like the chicks who have defiled his body and their eyes reflect their wretched faces.

[–]WorkaholiconewNo Pill, Leaning red, Brazilian.-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Dissatisfaction results when reality does not live up to our expectations.

Women have absurd expectations. And so does men.

MGTOW arises because men suppose women are not attracted to only the high valued men

WGTOW arises because women are attracted to only the high valued men

[–]Red__Blue-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

They’re taught to be very entitled.

[–]Eastuss༼ つ ▀̿_▀̿ ༽つ-2 points-1 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

That's just their natural incentives. They're greedy but they can't satisfy that greed, they'd rather shut it all down than deal with compromises.

It's just like gay, asexuals, or incels, they're broken and unfit for survival of the fittest, eventually only the compromising females are going to transfer their genes and things will balance.

[–]InterestingStorm77 points8 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

They're greedy but they can't satisfy that greed

How strange coming from the polygamist male gender who willingly torpedos his life for a little sex.

Men need MGTOW to do what women will naturally do in the face of bad options. More than half of MGTOW continue to pay for sex or pursue women only to keep his MGTOW status by saying he won't marry. Women get friends, activity, and cats with better health outcomes than their married peers.

I don't see how you are characterizing women who leave men alone as greedy in the face of, well, the entire nature of men.

[–]Eastuss༼ つ ▀̿_▀̿ ༽つ-2 points-1 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Life wouldn't exist if we weren't greedy, men are greedy too, I never said the contrary.

But most men have strong incentives to learn from their failure and adjust. MGTOW are broken individuals too that are unfit and they'll be selected out. It's just that it's a lot less likely to happen because men are much more resilient to failure, therefore why men felt like they needed to create a whole movement and concept...

I don't see how you are characterizing women who leave men alone as greedy in the face of, well, the entire nature of men.

I don't see why WGTOW wouldn't appear like greedy people to you. Almost as if you wanted to say that their behavior is justified because men are so baaad. Flash news, this isn't how life works. WGTOW or MGTOW are just greedy people who can't compromise or adjust, that's the definition of dumb.

[–]InterestingStorm73 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Both may be greedy but men inflict psychological damage and bodily harm on women if they are a bad match and it just seems logical to leave men alone if that is all you can get. I also take issue with you calling women who lean WGTOW greedy. Have you ever heard of a woman who leaves men alone because he wasn't a godly billionaire Chad? What are some of the reasons you believe a woman would opt out?

I see some MGTOW as greedy because they want to contribute little to nothing and be gifted the submission and world of nubile women too attractive for them. That may be hyperbole but even if we kept to those who abide by traditional gender roles, they don't want to play their part and hate women. They are tradcons who want the benefits of tradcon women without benefiting women.

A woman is judged by her ability to get and keep a man in this society so a woman driven to WGTOW isn't doing it out of greed. Greed would be holding her nose and marrying someone she hates for appearances.

[–]Eastuss༼ つ ▀̿_▀̿ ༽つ-1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Both may be greedy but men inflict psychological damage and bodily harm on women if they are a bad

Hahahaha, woman team bullshit.

Have you ever heard of a woman who leaves men alone because he wasn't a godly billionaire Chad?

No but I've never heard a woman go WGTOW because men would beat and rape her. Most women who go their own way are just not satisfied despite lot of decent men were lining up to LTR them despite they were legitimately low SMV.

That's greed. Wanting too much and offering too little, exactly like how you talk about MGTOW.

And even if a woman only gets men to beat her and treat her bad, this kind of woman never makes an effort to date different kinds of men, she doesn't change nor adjust, she just decides all men are trash and decides to stay alone. Similar level of dumb.

so a woman driven to WGTOW isn't doing it out of greed.

No she doesn't do it out of greed, she does it because she can't satisfy her greed therefore she has to inhibit it entirely.

Greed would be holding her nose and marrying someone she hates for appearances.

Well her greed isn't satisfied since she's hating this man. You do not understand greed, it seems.

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]Eastuss༼ つ ▀̿_▀̿ ༽つ0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Decent according to you, a man on Team Man. Men are notorious for ignoring the wants and needs of women until they have a daughter or something so this is hardly a surprise

Decent according to me and my more reasonable female friends.

Says who? You? Can you even share an uncredited blog post to support your claim?

Lmao a blog post? Is that the kind of source you expect? Look ,quit your sad hypo agentic excuses, if you're permanently having issues with men you're either super ugly or super retarded. It's been shown autistic women have the most issues with rape and consent.

Now I'm not saying some people can't get it without having to put shitload of efforts, making lot of sacrifices or compromises. But it's not the case for most people.

I, too, am greedy then because I disagree that being a brood mare or victim of marital rape, domestic violence, or the chore of being Mommy #2 for an ungrateful sexually unfulfilling man child is a good life.

Plenty of women find men who don't fit this description. How come you can't?

And what do you bring to the relationship? Are you good looking? Are you sexual and sexually attracted to men in general? Are you a micro managing cunt (probably why you think you're his mommy #2)? Are you in need of being provided all the time with money and emotional support?

After all, you aren't even single and are with a woman who deemed you beneficial. It bothers you that she might rather be without you if you didn't because males operate from a position of scarcity and you could never say the same.

Lol, it's actually me who could go without her. I'm the introvert, I'm the one who needs space and who could afford to be alone for a prolonged time.

Me and my wife are just two people working together and making compromises. People who don't do compromises are alone, except for a minority of very skilled or genetically gifted people.

What about you? How long has your longest relationship been?

No, it's more like you have created an entire argument based on an entitlement where you take female utility as female fulfillment.

Does that make any sense? Life is simple, people are greedy, and those who are too greedy and won't compromise end up alone, both for men and women. You are spitting words and bullshity concepts because you absolutely want to make the female side justified when there can't ever be any justification for being a loser at life. Women like that are going to be culled out. The only meaningful metric in life is how you successfully survive and reproduce, and they fucked it up, end of story.

[–]Sir_manalot-1 points0 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

That is silly.

Mgtow and wgtow are reactions to the other side being too greedy themselves out of arrogance.

The issue with your POV is that you overvalue our natural mating game. If we do play the “survival of the fittest game,” a culture that doesn’t play it would eventually beats us out.

Not because survival of the fittest is bad, but humans natural mating game is very outdated and we are evolving too slowly to keep up with modern technology (especially with how it is accelerating now).

Also, life would definitely exist without greed. It wouldn’t be as advanced as it is now, but it would exist. The issue is that the very thing that made us so advanced is now holding us back.

If we follow the mating game, we are going to go backwards until we are either in caves, go extinct or get overtaken by a culture who doesn’t play the game.

[–]Eastuss༼ つ ▀̿_▀̿ ༽つ0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

If we do play the “survival of the fittest game,” a culture that doesn’t play it would eventually beats us out.

Develop what you mean because right now what I understand is "people who go their own way will beat us at survival of the fittest" which makes 0 sense.

but humans natural mating game is very outdated and we are evolving too slowly to keep up with modern technology (especially with how it is accelerating now).

It definitively is adapting quickly.

It wouldn’t be as advanced as it is now, but it would exist. The issue is that the very thing that made us so advanced is now holding us back.

Yes. You understand I'm not going to disclaim that.

If we follow the mating game, we are going to go backwards until we are either in caves, go extinct or get overtaken by a culture who doesn’t play the game.

I'm not sure what you mean by "doesn't play the game" other than "play the game but differently".

If we keep up with the "all female choice" route we're heading now, we're going to indeed get beaten by tradcons society who go "all people must pair and reproduce", which are societies designed around everyone compromising. Or we're going to head back to an all compromise society by having all our deffectuous uncompromising individuals not pair and disappear.

[–]Sir_manalot0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Develop what you mean because right now what I understand is "people who go their own way will beat us at survival of the fittest" which makes 0 sense.

Doesn’t matter. The only reason many of these men are losing is because of artificial changes to society.

And it doesn’t matter who has kids when the culture will die and be replaced by another culture who doesn’t play the survival of the fittest game (ex: how Muslims are slowly going to take over Europe.

It definitively is adapting quickly.

It is being freed, not adapting. Humans are not evolving quickly, we are just letting people actually do what our nature wants.

I’m not sure what you mean by "doesn't play the game" other than "play the game but differently".

Cultures that stop the mating game beat those that keep it going. Just look at patriarchy, it so basically socialism for relationships. Everyone gets a mate that is close to there worth and they all get to breed.

Our natural mating game just doesn’t work post agricultural age.

Eventually we will evolve so that isn’t true, but that will take thousands of years atleast.

Heck, many of the current winners are only winning because society prevents other men from “defeating” them.

It doesn’t matter if I am better then what society says is a top tier man, I will never even be given a chance to prove it. Many of the people here are probably better then many top tier men, but they will never let anybody even challenge them (without it being rigged), so they can never actually prove it.

[–]Eastuss༼ つ ▀̿_▀̿ ༽つ0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

(ex: how Muslims are slowly going to take over Europe.

Not muslims, arabians.

I guarantee you muslims' children don't stay mulsim after getting used to european culture.

Humans are not evolving quickly, we are just letting people actually do what our nature wants.

The hardcoded algorithm isn't evolving quickly, but the algorithm is meant to adapt to a wide range of variations of the environment.

For the rest, seems like we agree on how things will go but not on what things are :p

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2023. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter