TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Why do some people criticize toxic masculinity, but still use "virgin" as an insult?

February 6, 2020
100 upvotes

Every so often on the internet, I see girls insult guys by saying that he's a virgin or incel (but perhaps not actually showing incels traits or saying anything an incel would say) or has probably never slept with anyone. But some of these people are the same people who say "toxic masculinity" is bad, and that someone shouldn't base their worth based on the number of people that they've slept with. But by calling these guys virgins, aren't they reinforcing "toxic masculinity" and are actually contradicting themselves?

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/PurplePillDebate.

/r/PurplePillDebate archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Title Why do some people criticize toxic masculinity, but still use "virgin" as an insult?
Author SDW137
Upvotes 100
Comments 187
Date February 6, 2020 4:18 AM UTC (3 years ago)
Subreddit /r/PurplePillDebate
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/PurplePillDebate/why-do-some-people-criticize-toxic-masculinity-but.330862
https://theredarchive.com/post/330862
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/ezmo5b/why_do_some_people_criticize_toxic_masculinity/
Red Pill terms in post
Comments

[–]PPD-AngelIncel Ban Count: 23, FDS ban count: 1[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children) | Copy Link

No rants. Removed.

[–]Joey_Lopez102 points103 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

You think they are trying to be logical? They just hate men.

[–]bunker_man._.7 points8 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Its not about hating men. Its about using shaming tactics to make people compliant with their ideology. Other than in a few rare instances, man haters are mostly a myth.

[–]LeJacquelopeHaving a son is child abuse15 points16 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

But using shaming tactics to force men into compliance is a hate tactic. The synonym is bigotry.

[–]bunker_man._.-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That's not what hate is. Not every way to hurt someone is based on hate.

[–]solaybrane4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

This. It's a cynical power play. They don't even care enough to hate.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

They care, if you’re tall and good looking, they care.

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]acmemetalworks6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Women dont logic like men. There's a reason there's a women's chess league.

[–][deleted] 20 points21 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

People use harsh words to insult people. For example people still use "retarded" but would never say that to an actual mentally retarded person. "Autistic" is a common insult as well but most would consider it cruel to an actual autistic person. It's a lack of thinking skills.

[–]Fichek8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Your example is completely upside down. If we apply your reasoning to what OP was saying the equivalent would be that people are not perpetuating toxic masculinity because even if they are using "virgin" and "incel" as an insult, they would never say that to actual virgins or incels.

What OP was actually saying (using your example) is that people who say that belittleling other people's intelligence is toxic are actually doing that.

[–]LeJacquelopeHaving a son is child abuse2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Dammit, already gave someone silver today...

[–]Jip_Jaap_Stam1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The "autistic" one bugs me. My son is severely-autistic, and he's a much better person (he doesn't have a malicious bone in his body) than any of the horrible people who use his condition as an insult.

[–]giorgi0002 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Apply the same to insults about skin colour.

[–]CHAD_TDK18 points19 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

There are toxic people in the world, and that's a fact.

Some are male, some are female; still toxic people.

If we want to specify some as "Toxic Masculinity" then we also need to talk about "Toxic Femininity"; people who don't believe that "Toxic Femininity" exists and only want to talk about "Toxic Masculinity" are Sexist Toxic People and they should be silenced and ignored.

[–]HollowLegMonk3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

We should just use the term “Toxic Humanity”.

[–]LeJacquelopeHaving a son is child abuse0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

LOL been using that term on my Tumblr page for ages.

[–]acmemetalworks0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Was gonna upvote till you said Silenced.

[–]acron5n5Male virgin11 points12 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Hypocrisy.

Many women indeed understand toxic masculinity is a huge problem but they cannot stop lusting after those who display it nor could they stop hating those who lack it and male virgins are usually the epitome of lack of traditional masculinity traits.

If we're deadly honest, men have same issue, although it's not so dramatic. Everyone knows bitches are bad yet men romantically pursue and marry them. Am sure these are same man who pontificate you must go after the shy girl type.

[–]Sir_manalot8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Men do not care about a women’s personality in the initial stages of dating (it is a icing on the cake at best).

They just go for who they think is the hottest. So a hot girl will be bitchy for it doesn’t matter what she acts like. Shy women are usually insecure and are either unattractive or hiding there attractiveness, so most men do not notice her.

Many men realize that many shy women are hiding there attractiveness and fetishize them in hopes of finding a good girl who isn’t a bitch.

Our society largely accepts this (many fight to try to change it).

But nobody (besides fringe groups) wants to admit the fact that women love toxic men. We have fat toxic men that are slaying because they are toxic, but fat bitchy women do not get any success.

After the initial stages of dating, people’s preferences change. Men want good women and women want good men.

But good people will never reach that point...which is why many nice men complain (they get frustrated).

[–]LeJacquelopeHaving a son is child abuse2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

100% real talk right there.

[–]JewelM419Femoid Trash6 points7 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

“Virgin” and “incel” are very different in this context. Incels are defined by their bitterness and hatred of women, not just their virgin status.

[–]Plutonic_blue[🍰] 19 points20 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

You know whats funny is how women can be bitter against men all the time and society basically applauds them "YEAH ALL MEN CHEAT, ALL MEN ARE DUMB, MEN AIN'T SHIT, FUCK MEN" and it's all good but once a dude does it he's suddenly an "Incel" "Bitter" "Nice guy TM"

Just a nice little double standard i noticed. I mean the instagram explore pages is fucking covered in women victim men shaming posts, and everytime theres one post that calls women out on their bullshit, theres always outrage in the comments lmao

[–]LiLZ9068 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Fucking preach! You could switch half of those instathots' posts from stuff like "Real man" to " "Real woman" (weak example) just to see how much shit they'd get themselves into if they were men. It's actually quite interesting, also wasn't this exact idea done on FB sometime ago?

[–]Sir_manalot1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Not true at all.

Just like how people call anybody they do not like retarded, autistic and such, people just call anybody who disagrees with there views on women a virgin or a incel.

I have seen real life players get called virgin incel on the internet for how they view women lol.

The only people that are filled with hatred and bitterness are those that use those insults.

[–]PrincepsOmni10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because of hypocrisy.

Like how women claim to the strong, free and liberated yet will accuse each other of sleeping around. Modern ideology meets biological reality.

Here's the reality"

  • Most men will, given the opportunity have sex with a wide range of women.
  • Most women will not have sex with a wide range of men though.

A man with multiple women who want to pair with him (dating lots of women, multiple wives or concubines etc) means he is a differentiated product that is sought after. Thus, calling a man a virgin is an insult - she's saying no one wants him, not even one woman. Women like to be with a man other women want - ask any honest woman (they don't want him actually sleeping with them though).

A woman sleeping with multiple men means she is marketing to a huge market and 'selling' at a low cost. Hence why calling a woman a whore or slut is insulting as it says shs'e so low value she'll sleep with anyone and isn't able to 'lock down' a decent mate. It's also why most men are repulsed by women with high notch counts...

Biology is really sexist.

[–]OmarsDamnSpoon9 points10 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Because you're talking about two different groups. Pretty sure you won't find many people against nazis but also say, "fuck those jews, though, for real."

[–]rus9384Aromantic but cuddly5 points6 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

BS. There were posts on r/Feminism virgin shaming a man. Upvoted ones.

[–]OmarsDamnSpoon0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

That's cool. Doesn't really change what I said. I shouldn't have to explain that life isn't black or white and that groups have fuzziness to their edges. What I said still applies, two different groups. While, yeah, you can find people who address real issues while also themselves being a part of said issue, they don't then outrepresent the larger majority who more often fall into the respective categories. Generally speaking, people who observe the toxicity of traditional masculinity aren't then going to take part in its toxicity, either. However, you will definitely find the one-off people who only reference toxic masculinity as more of a general slur as a way to suggest that men are just toxic overall.

Overall, still two different groups. I understand toxic masculinity (easy as I'm a guy and I witnessed it), those around me also understand toxic masculinity without taking part in it, most people I encounter who discuss toxic masculinity avoid contributing to it. However, I have met the rare man or woman who reference it with some weird shallow optic intention while also adding to that very toxicity with "virgin" or "don't be a fag" or other dumb shit.

[–]rus9384Aromantic but cuddly6 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I understand toxic masculinity

I also understand it, but I see way more hypocrites on reddit than I wished to.

[–]OmarsDamnSpoon1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That's pretty understandable. Just keep in mind that reddit or its subreddits aren't necessarily the best sample of an overall population.

[–]Female_urinary_mazeWOMEN LIKE SEX.2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

A lot of people just aren't very intelligent and don't think things through. Additionally some others are just fucking toxic and don't even care weather what they're saying makes any sense.

[–]vicistvicNo Pill2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The answer is not simple. I believe that men willingly refusing to have sex receive disdain from sexually active women because they are jealous of the men for being virgins and displaying real power and strength. These women could even argue men willingly staying virginal are displaying a form of toxic masculinity such is the warped logic.

Furthermore, women openly speak of their unattached sexual partners to be out of their lives at their behest. They also disfavour such men for committed monogamous setting which indicates their subconscious biological imperative and desire to eventually mate with a chaste man.

Women can find logic in sexual illiberal ideals, but that involves rejection of the popular culture. Women's popular movements have been by design of external influences and they are not female.

[–]beto_7472 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because they are full of shit

[–]CatchPhrazeMaster Of Memeology4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Big difference between "You're so flawed no human being is going to put up with you." like calling someone an incel or virgin and "You don't constantly slay pussy so your trash"

Woman aren't thinking like men when they use those insults. Being told your not being a slut is never a negative to us. Being told you're such a shitty human being that nobody want's to be in your company is an insult. It's not that he's not a "real man" is that hes a "Shitty person"

[–]jfedjNo Pill1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This sub gets these wires crossed on occasion.

[–]Ordinary-West8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Toxic masculinity is in itself a shaming tactics just as "virgin". That's why those people use both of these words/sentences. They want to suppress men.

[–]beetlejuicer__Socrates was a troll17 points18 points  (45 children) | Copy Link

Honestly I see more dudes complain about twitter feminists complaining about toxic masculinity, than I see twitter feminists actually complain about toxic masculinity.

[–][deleted]  (5 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]beetlejuicer__Socrates was a troll8 points9 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

This is a different tangent but.

Doesn't this also go the other way?

[–]NockerJoeKing Hater8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah. Thats the point. All major platforms segregate people into bubbles and echo chambers. The only people who regularly leave this bubble and return are people looking for outrage. So any random Literal Who's whining is magnified in an opposing bubble.

[–]Sir_manalot1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Nope because man hating is much bigger in comparison.

You cannot even spend an hour watching TV without atleast seeing one instance of “lol stupid men.” Heck, you cannot escape it in day to day life as people will frequently shove it in your face.

You literally cannot escape it.

In order to find men complaining about women in any capacity, you have to purposefully go out of your way to find it. Which is why feminists obsess over incels and such. You cannot find “toxic masculinity” unless you purposefully go out of your way to look for it.

[–]CatchPhrazeMaster Of Memeology0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

That's murdered by words worthy. Jesus.

[–]LillthOfBabylon2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Statistics show that most people aren't feminists.

[–]LeJacquelopeHaving a son is child abuse2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Funny how toxic masculinity is literally a feminist narrative. I can dig you up a hundred articles by them about toxic masculinity. Want me to try?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well we’re not on twatter, for one thing

[–]LillthOfBabylon5 points6 points  (35 children) | Copy Link

Thats why I never understood this whole "Feminists are taking over culture!" thing. It seems the popular culture hates feminism.

[–]UddersMakeMeShudder19 points20 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

Having just graduated from a fairly left wing UK university, I can safely say some cultures have been completely feminism based. Meaning political feminism, not vague equality. Terms like toxic masculinity were quite common.

I think an an ideology it operates most effectively in closed cultures like universities, some online message boards, etc. which normal people may not be aware of

[–][deleted]  (7 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]RandomAttackHelpMe-1 points0 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

You have heard about the public schools yes?

[–]lovegrug1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Makes you wonder where most teachers go to before babysitting 8 year olds...

And dont you forget it little Johnny, you better go to college or else....
... I may regret my life decisions!

[–]RandomAttackHelpMe-1 points0 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

I meant what they teach.

[–]lovegrug0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Yes, admittedly there's less college fear mongering in High schools than Elementary schools, though the ideas can still permeate. Does seem to tie in with the promotion of giving adderall to 5 year old boys.

[–]RandomAttackHelpMe-1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Not what I meant.

[–]lovegrug1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

What do you think they teach? In half the humanities classes I took at college, there was a range of over socialized teachings.

[–]decoy88Black Male in London6 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I think an an ideology it operates most effectively in closed cultures like universities

Which is why the “feminists are taking over!” is a big deal on Reddit. The demographics are the same.

[–]UddersMakeMeShudder2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I think you can find sets of subreddits which, by and large, believe anything. A fair number are largely feminist, I'm sure, whilst a good number are anti feminist.

[–]RandomAttackHelpMe1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Well, where is the line between "toxic masculinity", and then people, anyone, man or women, having enough of things and going "Fuck this shit" ?

[–]UddersMakeMeShudder-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm not sure what exactly you mean? Toxic masculinity is a set of masculine behaviours now considered harmful to oneself or society. I dont think "fuck this shit" behaviour applies to that

[–]LillthOfBabylon1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I think an an ideology it operates most effectively in closed cultures like universities

Agreed. When you get out to the open internet, people react more adversely to feminism.

[–]UddersMakeMeShudder1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Not sure I'd agree - Anti feminist ideology has always seemed to me to work in similar ways

In real life / on the 'open internet' (not sure what this is) I'd say most people are just well-meaning and apolitical, either the 'I'm a feminist because it just means equality right?' Or 'I treat people equally but I try to stay out of all the politics'

[–]rus9384Aromantic but cuddly5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It seems the popular culture hates feminism.

The popular culture supports feminism. Most American people are supportive of feminism (even if they don't consider themselves feminists).

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

That depends on what you define as popular culture. As there's a part that loves it as there's commercial feminism and feminism being part of media and such. And you have Finland well run by women.

[–]jfedjNo Pill-1 points0 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Finland is run by women?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Uh yes. You should really be reading international news sometime.

[–]jfedjNo Pill-1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

The parties are all headed by women. This isn’t really the same thing.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

She also appointed women to basically all of the departments.

[–]ThorLivesSkeptical Purple Pill Man3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

It's more complicated than that.

Yes, there are women who are afraid of calling themselves feminists because there are enough nasty feminists around that they don't want to be associated with the word.

But, feminist beliefs are very common among women.

While there's certainly a lot of feminist women in the US, it's even stronger in Scandinavian countries. I've been to Iceland, and could tell that feminists most definitely have the upper-hand there. Places like Sweden bought a copy of the book "We should all be feminists" for every single student in the country.

You're downplaying the power of feminists.

[–]jfedjNo Pill1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Without knowing the contents of said book we really can’t criticize it.

[–]bunker_man._.1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I think this is one of the issues. The term feminism is in this ambiguous state since it is both the term used for general equality, but also became tainted by the fact that in most social contexts the more that one identifies with the term more likely the more crazy they are, and is definitely tied to a lot of dubious things. And it is an elephant in the room where you can't really ignore the connotations of the word and that the former is fairly often used as a pipeline to the latter.

[–]RandomAttackHelpMe0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well they kind of were/did, it wasn't even so much the idea of feminist influence in culture, most people probably don't give as much a fuck as you think they do, it was more they really were trying to turn it all into this ideological crusade where everything was supposed to be magically overnight progressive cause Obama was president, that's nothing against him btw, whole other can of worms there, and these angry fanboys were to do as they say!!!! They took an ideological approach and were surprised when most people weren't feeling it.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy Link

The popular opinion is that we should have a 3 day work week, free healthcare and casual fridays all week long.

Popular isnt the full story, what the powerful and well placed believe usually prevails. If most of the media, celebrities, academics and other cultural hegemons embrace an idea, no matter how bad, then that idea becomes powerful.

[–]LillthOfBabylon1 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Then why is Trump President and the UK left the EU?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Those are political outcomes, politics generally lags behind culture by a few decades. It doesnt mean we dont have cultural hegemons, just that their power is more about influencing where the country will be 20 years from now, not necessarily whatever backlash or setbacks are occurring in present day politics

You ask a good question though, very thought provoking. It is a cultural war after all so I admit there are two sides fighting and it isnt just the left dominating, however they are certainly in the stronger position due to having most of our cultural institutions and media/tech companies on lockdown

[–]RandomAttackHelpMe0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Those are political outcomes, politics generally lags behind culture by a few decades.

I would say no. If anything, one tries to catch up or mix with the other and it can balance out or fall in on it's self. That's pretty much what the left became under Obama. Ghostbusters remake war anyone?

[–]RandomAttackHelpMe0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

It is a cultural war after all so I admit there are two sides fighting and it isnt just the left dominating, however they are certainly in the stronger position due to having most of our cultural institutions and media/tech companies on lockdown

But does having those media/tech companies on lockdown actually do anything to yah know, help them win elections? I'm not denying the influence, but kicking Alex Jones and Gavin McInnes off of facbook and youtube cause they said some things you don't like doesn't quite translate into winning an election. They think people aren't looking at that and going "Well hold on now....." Or having a decent shot of winning the election by picking Sanders, I am not a "Bernie Bro", I just think he would be the most likely to win if nominated. Even the hardcore Trump base realized that, and then pissing and moaning cause Joe Rogan chose to endorse him and then oh no! he said some things once!!!!!!

I think it's time to end this culture war bullshit. It ran out of steam and aside from the occasional well written think piece, is pointless by now.

[–]RandomAttackHelpMe0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

A very large majority of people decided to give you the finger, that's why.

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[removed]

[–]-TheGreasyPole-Pissed Off that Reddit Admins killed my old account[M] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Be civil, and no race baiting. This is a warning.

[–]bunker_man._.0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Also, man hating. Where are all these man hating feminists? Even annoying feminist are rarely actually man hating. Its pretty self evident that people are just interpreting generalized criticism of sexism as being out to "get" men. They have problems, but man hating isn't really one of them.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

If that's true, based.

[–]RandomAttackHelpMe-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I think for a while the feminists where, then when most dudes actually stood up to them, they backed off.

[–]TheSnowyPlover4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

As a man you’re either a draft animal or you’re breeding stock—This implies two things:

  1. That women promote the aspects of masculinity that are beneficial to them and shame the ones that aren’t

  2. You’re expected to know your place and stay in it. A creep and a stud can say the same thing and exhibit the same behavior, but the difference is how sexy each one is in the eyes of women

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Toxic masculinity is a term women created to avoid taking responsibility for creating a population of disappointing beta males.

[–]Sir_manalot3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Sadly, women will never take responsibility for that (and they never do historically).

Women have literally created all there own modern problems and they are the only ones that can fix them.

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew13 points14 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

"Girls" dgaf about "toxic masculinity"

[–]codedinblood19 points20 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Thats not true. They DO give a fuck about it. They love it, thats why they go for douchebags. Don’t know why this is even a conversation anymore.

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Thats not what i mean by give a fuck. Theyre not running around thinking about the concept of toxic masculinity

[–]HRELast-3 points-2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Girls don't go for douchebags.

[–]codedinblood22 points23 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

girls dont go for douchebags

-Girls who go for douchebags

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Heh.

Well meme’d friend.

[–]bunker_man._.1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Not on purpose, but certain kinds of aggressive assholes are known to get sex easily despite obviously being terrible or even dangerous people. Its half that if you are charismatic a lot of people will overlook your bad qualities, but half that some people actively venerate those qualities. Usually the ones who do aren't regular people, but people from extra trashy circles though.

[–]praisethesun799Not actually a fag 😉-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, aggressive assholes usually have traits that are attractive despite being assholes , such as assertiveness , lack of inhibitions and generally masculine behaviour. Though you can be all that without being a cunt.

That's usually the case too, but lots of shy, introverted guys , in high school for example, seem to brand any guy who's loud, assertive , likes sports and goes to the gym, as "assholes"

It's just perception bias really

[–]praisethesun799Not actually a fag 😉-3 points-2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh god this again.

"Douchebag" is usually a shy introverted nerdy guy's code for "every guy who's confident , assertive , loud, and likes sports " lol

[–]LillthOfBabylon5 points6 points  (60 children) | Copy Link

incel (but perhaps not actually showing incels traits or saying anything an incel would say)

Context matters.

But some of these people are the same people who say "toxic masculinity" is bad

Yeah. Teaching men that their worth comes from sex is stupid. Incels are hated because they're assholes due to their virginity. If anything, Incels come from toxic masculinity.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (30 children) | Copy Link

They're not virgins if women would fuck them.

Instead, women fuck the men who actively harm and hurt women and other men.

Women prop up toxic masculinity.

[–]LillthOfBabylon3 points4 points  (21 children) | Copy Link

Instead, women fuck the men who actively harm and hurt women and other men.

Elliot Rodgers did alot of harming.

[–]Sir_manalot3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Elliot Rodgers literally as a bunch of fan girls now because of what he did.

He literally stopped being an incel by killing people...

If he was alive, he would be receiving thousands of love letters on a weekly basis like nikolas Cruz does.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sun-sentinel.com/local/broward/parkland/florida-school-shooting/fl-reg-nikolas-cruz-prison-love-letters-20180327-story.html%3foutputType=amp

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (19 children) | Copy Link

6 is a lot?

He didn't even get the Stacys he was aiming for, and he killed more men than he did women (and no one cared about the men).

[–]LillthOfBabylon0 points1 point  (18 children) | Copy Link

Very irrelevant.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (17 children) | Copy Link

Extremely relevant. That's 6 lives you could've saved if one of y'all's just fucked him, but you didn't care to, especially because he mostly killed men.

[–]LillthOfBabylon3 points4 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

So you’re promoting rape now?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

Who's raping who?

[–]LillthOfBabylon5 points6 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

Blackmail is considered raped. You’re glorifying sex under the threat of violence. That’s blackmail. Therefore rape.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Who's blackmailing who?

[–]throwawaygaming694 points5 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

I’ve asked a hundred times why you come here and change no ones opinion while sending yourself further down the rabbit hole, but you don’t listen

[–]bunker_man._.0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Instead, women fuck the men who actively harm and hurt women and other men.

But most incels are legit mentally off people who would still be unstable even if they weren't incels. Hell, didn't you read that one story about someone who felt sorry for a self professed incel and so dated and had sex with them only for them to basically double down since their worldview couldn't adjust?

[–]Sir_manalot2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That just isn’t true.

Incels become ill because of social isolation and lack of intimacy.

Your example is flawed because he knew it was pity and because it was pity It meant that he was right.

If he wasn’t shitted on in the first place, then he would have never became ill.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's not just incels, it also includes the average dudes of the world and beta bucks and the like.

[–]jfedjNo Pill0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Oh mY gOd i JuSt dESeRvE Ah fUcK

Women also fuck men who don’t hurt them.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Only when they can't get anyone better

[–]jfedjNo Pill-1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

If you think that a man who hurts women is perceived as better than a man who doesn’t then you have a misconception.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

No, I don't. Abusive and violent men get women easier and they stay with him longer.

[–]RandomAttackHelpMe1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's true. I am sick of people denying it. I work with this guy, we actually get along fine, we talk, we laugh, we talk about issues, so his long term, very devoted gf just had a second kid with him. The whole time, he was seeing side chick after side chick, think he told one about the other?

I asked him what he would do if she did this? No, I am not whiteknighting, just if these things come out, I tell them how I feel. He said he would like, well, beat her. Yeah. And we have gone over what can happen if she catches him, she caught him before and still stayed with him, he could lose custody, child support for years, etc. So yeah, cut the bullshit.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (22 children) | Copy Link

How exactly do incels come from masculinity (seeing masculinity is deemed toxic).

[–]hippiefromolema5 points6 points  (21 children) | Copy Link

They come from the toxic belief that a man is defined by his n count.

[–]ThorLivesSkeptical Purple Pill Man3 points4 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

They come from the toxic belief that a man is defined by his n count.

Or maybe incels are bitter because of the lack of validation from the opposite sex? In that case, their problem is their human-ness, not their toxic masculinity and need for a high number count. Being ostracised (from friendships) at school can lead to tremendous bitterness, too. Why can't being ostracised from romantic/sexual relationships be a cause of tremendous bitterness?

[–]hippiefromolema3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I would argue one only feels angry and murderous from “a lack of validation from the opposite sex” AKA getting actual sex (because these men didn’t care about the nonsexual validation they received at all) if one feels entitled to it. And that feeling of entitlement to another person’s body is part of toxic masculinity.

[–]ThorLivesSkeptical Purple Pill Man1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I think "entitled" is an overused insult, and it's an easy accusation to make.

Example: Kid can't make friends at school, so he's angry. Now, we get to vilify him by saying that he feels "entitled" to friendship. See how easy it is to throw around the "entitled" criticism?

[–]jfedjNo Pill2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

People don’t “deserve” friends in the same way they don’t deserve sex. Both of these things come from treating other people in the proper manner.

It’s easy to throw the criticism around when it’s valid. If the kid thinks he deserves friends he has the same issue that incels sometimes have.

[–]RandomAttackHelpMe-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I see the concerns about entitlement, but that's a shitty thing to say to someone they don't deserve friends. I don't think this approach is helping the issue, which to me is what the focus should be.

[–]RandomAttackHelpMe0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

He's right. It's more than just not sex, it's a lack of connection and emotional closeness.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (13 children) | Copy Link

They more come from the view of women won't fuck them than anything else. It has nothing to do with n count. Your confusing RPers with incels here. RPers care about how much sex they get, incels simply want to have sex.

[–]hippiefromolema1 point2 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

Wanting to have sex is directly relevant to the emphasis on n count here.

[–]bunker_man._.0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes and no. Traditionalist religious conservatives still want to get married and have sex, but aren't the same thing as people who think they need to have some exceptionally impressive sex life.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

No its not. Again you are confusing RPers with incels.

[–]hippiefromolema1 point2 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

"I deserve girls much more than all those slobs.” Ultimately that is not about virginity but about how he sees himself as a man in comparison to other men.

I don’t know why you’re drawing a distinction between RPers and Incels. There’s a lot of overlap. Rodgers saw himself as a “true alpha male” and a “supreme gentleman” (his words).

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy Link

Sexual entitlement isn't about n counts. Rodgers was not RPer but more an incel than anything else.

Also you do know downvoting is against the rules right?

[–]hippiefromolema0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

I’m not downvoting anyone.

And sexual entitlement, the celebration of high n counts for men, and toxic masculinity are all entwined.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

None of it is entwined. Why you think that is beyond me. But again you think masculinity is toxic so I guess that's why.

[–]RandomAttackHelpMe-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

"I deserve girls much more than all those slobs.”

Well holy fucking shit, you seem some of these guys and you can't blame a guy for feeling that way.

[–]RandomAttackHelpMe-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

And where does that belief come from? Bad social influence. Not even ye old patriarchy boogeyman. If anything, ye old patriarchy boogeyman encourages a more non-culture/superficial approach to such things.

[–]Rajan_922 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

How are they assholes due to their virginity? Incels may come from toxic masculinity but throwing the word shows you promote toxic masculinity

[–]LillthOfBabylon0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

In reality, theyre assholes due to mental health. They just THINK being laid will fix them.

Also, no. I call them what I see them. Just like I’ll call a bitch A BITCH.

[–]RandomAttackHelpMe2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Not fix them, but if these guys get laid, it will help them sort things out.

[–]Rajan_92-1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

How do you know that they think getting laid will fix them and they want to get laid?

[–]LillthOfBabylon1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Because of the shit they write.

[–]Rajan_920 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Like what?

[–]997854698215620m/no pill5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Because men are hated.

Women have a deep, profound disgust for virgin men. Women control the societal narrative on morality and value, so virgin men are basically cattle.

The whole incel being used as insult is typical internet white knighting. They'll turn around and try to convince men that being a virgin is not a big deal and that sex isn't important. It's a lie, obviously.

What people call toxic masculinity is just not being a doormat for society to walk on. Women are attracted to "toxic masculinity" but don't say it out loud.

[–]RandomAttackHelpMe2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

What people call toxic masculinity is just not being a doormat for society to walk on. Women are attracted to "toxic masculinity" but don't say it out loud.

Well no one wants to be a doormat, can't blame someone for that. I feel it's different from toxic masculinity. If standing up for one's self, realistically, not this my coupon didn't work or they're out of the product I want and there are 5 other places all within 5 minutes of here and yet I won't even go there bullshit, is seen as "toxic", we REALLY have warped our senses on things.

Oh, they will tell you they are. My thing is, just don't make it my problem unless my dick is getting sucked.

I really think toxic masculinity means nothing and is just a buzzword made up for the general assholes and creeps out there. It sounded good so all the batshit feminists and there sympy soy boys took it and ran with it.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Women prop up toxic masculinity more than men do.

[–]bunker_man._.1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I think this is one of the issues. Feminists pay lip service to accepting that sexism is caused by women too or harms men too, but in practice their big picture view is still women and victims and men as perpetrators.

[–]limbojunkie1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

People who accuse men of toxic masculinity are the same who call other men incels: Just to insult men.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Masculine socialization is learned narcissism. https://blogs.psychcentral.com/relationships/2019/02/5-reasons-why-violence-narcissism-and-psychopathology-are-not-gender-neutral/

Masculinity and femininity are how we take the differences between the sexes and exaggerate them to make men superior and women inferior.

The positive and negative features of masculinity and femininity are traits both sexes possess, but Man School is like military training. It takes away empathy and replaces it with absolute control.

So slut hate is because women should be pure in a male supremacist society. And virgin hate for men is because men take pride in their ability to seduce, so they shame other men. Women internalize all of these messages but they hardly create them. How would that benefit them?

[–]femmefatale2323Thick Thighs and Firm Butt Pill1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Men have inherent physical dominance over women due to nature, therefore women want social dominance to level the playing field.

[–]saltinadojust tylenol's fine, thanks1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes and it's the shittiest. Virgin shaming men is the worst. Also small dick shaming, I feel it's similar.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Girls: can get sex at the drop of a hat off any simp

Guys: have to try and work for sex, so if you're a virgin you're a failure that can't talk to women

[–]acmemetalworks1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Total lack of self awareness. They are the same people that rage if they see an incident of "Body Shaming" then call a guy a needle dick.

[–]The_Mole_Dizzle3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

girls generally have the pussy pass to say whatever they want

[–]RandomAttackHelpMe-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

No, you deal with enough princess, or prince types, you'll be ready to go fuck all on them.

[–]AutoModeratorMarried to MRS_DRgree[M] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Attention!

  • You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.

  • For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.

  • If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.

  • OP you can choose your own flair according to these guidelines., just press Flair under your post!

Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]CommittedToLearningactually just be yourself0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Why isnt this on askfeminists or some bullshit like that? How in any way does this relate to debating RP vs BP or gender dynamics?

[–]angels-fanCrooning over hellscapes7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Askfeminists would just ban him, like they do everyone that doesn't toe the libfem party line.

Dissent is not tolerated there.

[–]leftleafthirdbranch0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

This applies more to real life, but....the more cynical part of me would be inclined to say that they are primarily concerned (subconsciously or not) with how toxic masculinity negatively affects THEM rather than the males themselves (toxic masculinity may encourage a guy to reveal intimate details about his sexual activity, compromising the status of girls he had sex with, or to be emotionally repressed). Additionally, By lampooning toxic masculinity, feminists also attempt to appeal to non-genderspecific values to gain support, since feminism is only truly effective when both genders speak up.

So "virgin" indicates inexperience with women and thus may imply a natural ineptitude with women in the insulting context (insinutating there is something unattractive about them) , and "incel" indicates a tendency to objectify women. I'd say the first one is a hell of a lot more objectifying than the second one, to be honest.

So basically, because the role of women is not emphasized in toxic masculinity, women do not realize how their words may contribute to the promotion of toxic masculinity.

I'm not very familiar with the social dynamics of teenage guys, though, so anybody has anything to chip in about that I'd love to hear it.

[–]Soylent_X0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes

[–]100dylan99No Pill man0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

  1. Everyone in this world is hypocritical at times

  2. There are multiple people on the internet

There you go, OP.

[–]Wallstreet30 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Beecause people are cruel, callous and malicious. Both men and women.

If you have nothing nice to say, say nothing at all has been replaced by vomit forth all you malice.

[–]hippiefromolema0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Generally the people who shame virginity are not the same ones who complain about male virgins. It’s not hypocrisy when two different and opposed people/groups are doing it.

[–]ThorLivesSkeptical Purple Pill Man3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

No, I've seen feminists attack men with the "virgin" label.

Edit: Some examples:

"Ditto this angry virgin"

https://twitter.com/rebeccawatson/status/285413219080749056

.

"this week on Monthly Meninist Virgin Meetings"

https://twitter.com/ohnonotfeminism/status/714860770849398784

[–]hippiefromolema-2 points-1 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Are they attacking them for being virgins or suggesting that they have a toxic personality that is responsible for not finding a relationship?

[–]ThorLivesSkeptical Purple Pill Man2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

See the examples I posted.

Also, if you're (the general you, not you personally) going to attack someone for having a toxic personality, it seems like they should just use those words instead of calling someone "virgin".

[–]LeJacquelopeHaving a son is child abuse0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

LOL you're going to get no response to that.

[–]TheBookOfSeilRed blood, blue balls and purple heart0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I don’t think the same people are doing both. One group is criticizing toxic masculinity while the other is virgin-shaming.

I’d imagine that if any are actually doing both, they view male virginity as an objective sign of “not being a real man.”

“Only real men get laid, bro.”

[–]ThorLivesSkeptical Purple Pill Man1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I have seen feminists attack men they don't like with the "virgin" insult.

Edit: Some examples:

"Ditto this angry virgin" https://twitter.com/rebeccawatson/status/285413219080749056

.

"this week on Monthly Meninist Virgin Meetings"

https://twitter.com/ohnonotfeminism/status/714860770849398784

[–]jenovajunkieNot Your Average MRA0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because have a lot of anxiety and I feel pressure to start boning girls (because I am 33), I don't know how to initiate sex.

Thus, I get called gay or an Intel, by women, who also find me being a virgin pitiful; as if I lack some sort of skill to obtain sex from a female, that I should have by now.

I am viewed not as a man, but a 16 year old boy. I am fucking 33, and I am losing the will for desire to even bother with sex because women are so manipulative.

[–]ChadsCumDumpster0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'll only use virgin or incel as an insult if a guy is a misogynist and thinks it's okay to call women "sluts". There's nothing wrong with giving someone a taste of their own medicine.

[–][deleted]  (12 children) | Copy Link

[removed]

[–]ThorLivesSkeptical Purple Pill Man2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Men need to destigmatize virginity.

Considering that "pre-selection" is a method used by women to vet men, the "virgin" label will not cease to be an insult even if men stop using it. In other words, when a man is identified as a virgin, women will interpret this as "this loser can't get women; women don't want him" which means he'll massively fail in the pre-selection game.

In case you're unfamiliar with the term:

Preselection is a principle which dictates that women are more attracted to men that seem attractive to other women. https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=preselection

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes I’m familiar with the theory. Women, generally speaking, use a lot of cues to vet men. Whether you’re attractive to other women is a small part of preselection. If a man is seen around other women. these women could even be his sisters or friends- no one knows! They just know that a man in female company signals trustworthiness and good social skills.

If you see him with a beautiful woman, that increases his social value. If he chooses me, then he has good taste in women.

It doesn’t mean ‘ew gross virgins.’

I will only concede that virgins aren’t great options for a casual hookups because it’s near 100% guaranteed he won’t last a second and might fall in love. This 100% does not matter if you’re attractive and not a sweaty weirdo about it. Many men are attractive late bloomers. If you’re judged on that, you’re dealing with a stupid bitch that wants to emasculate you and is preselecting for casual sex. Men tend not to like female virgins for casual, either.

Did you know that it used to be ‘game’ for young Victorian men to pretend to be a virgin to all women he came across so that they had the opportunity to get horny women teach him the ways of love? I’ve even seen guys do this on hookup apps, “oh I’m a virgin, I need a woman to teach me!”

[–]LeJacquelopeHaving a son is child abuse2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Men need to destigmatize virginity.

Not going to work, because women are the primary stigmatizers of virginity.

[–]throwawaygaming692 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Ah yes of course, women are only doing it because men are.

I will drop redpill from my body completely the day I see any woman real life or online accept full accountability. Truly shocking how none can do it

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Men blame women for what men do literally constantly. Men create the cultural messages. They make all the movies. They start movements to use women for sex so they can high five each other for bro points. That’s toxic. Women did not come up with that, but they do suffer from it and so do you men Get over yourself, solve your own problems, stop waiting for women to do everything for you

[–]throwawaygaming691 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I can only pray I never reach such delusions. Women don’t have to create anything to still be perpetuators of the problem. Which they are. I never argued males weren’t playing their parts, just that females can’t admit to playing along with it, which you clearly demonstrated. It’s always a males fault. I pray I never reach such delusions

[–]countjulian4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

This is complete nonsense, the word "incel" implies you're not having sex, it strikes at the EXACT SAME vulnerability as "virgin." If you fuck, you're not an incel. Furthermore it's not just incel, feminists exactly like you will say things like "you must never get laid" "you must have a small penis" "if you ever actually got laid, you wouldn't say that" etc., it's their go-to insult. The fact of the matter is that any supposed compassion for men offered by feminism is an absolute lie, feminists will strike at the most tender vulnerabilities instantly in the cause of advancing their agenda.

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[removed]

[–]LeJacquelopeHaving a son is child abuse0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Incel is a synonym for virgin now because men made it so. They gave it the angry, woman-hating connotation.

God damn if I could be high enough to delude myself this badly.

[–]997854698215620m/no pill4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

It’s not the virginity that’s the problem, it’s the anger.

This is a joke, right? There's no way you're serious.

Men need to destigmatize virginity.

Women first. Women hate virgin men with a kind of hate that should be reserved for something so low it shouldn't be spoken of.

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

You’re 20. You’re the child I was speaking of in my post. Most men don’t lose it til college. Virginity is a concept men invented, anyway.

No one is ever going to want you with that attitude. Stop giving a fuck and no one else will. It’s playground teasing like ‘cooties, cooties.’ It means nothing unless you go incel about it.

[–]LeJacquelopeHaving a son is child abuse2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Women on here say they won't fuck a virgin who's that old. Literally they refute everything you're saying.

[–]Rajan_92-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Incel is an ad hominem. It's their cognitive dissonance that makes them use such words. If it's acceptable to shame a man, it's acceptable to call women sluts, thots and hoes.

[–]createweirdstories-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I've always thought that too.

[–]wateroclock-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because women don't have better insults. Women are lame, deal with it.

[–]poppy_blublack midget wine mom 🍷-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

When most people here refer to “incels” they’re talking specifically about the group of whiny, entitled, angry men spreading their misogyny across the Internet. It’s not a swipe at men who are celibate.

[–]C0mpL1c1tNo Pill-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Those “women” are likely “girls”. Adolescents are fairly unilaterally insufferable.

[–]RandomAttackHelpMe-2 points-1 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

These people are in denial and don't know how to handle or help the situation. Yes, technically, you shouldn't base your worth on how many people you have slept with, it's a nice idea, but the sort of collected and shared and experiences and reality of a good majority of people, and yes, mostly men if we're being honest here, tells us much differently.

Well, what do you think happens when you have a change in cultural values and a shift from traditions? I'm not even talking religious fundamentalism stuff. I mean a more so realistic social agreement of appreciation, trust, and respect. You replace that with an almost non-stop sense of I'm going to get as much as I can and want with no limits and no one stopping me cause I am just either greedy or entitled enough to do it. Mixed with lax social feelings and influence on such casual enough relationships, and yes, what people do in the privacy of their own home and lives is their business, however, when you kind of can't keep it to yourself or try to make it everyone else's problem, you're crossing a certain limit most people have.

Like it's one thing if well, you got the main chick and well, a side chick or two, I can see the problem(s) with that but let's not deny anything. And then on top of that, you just want more and more. And/or then if you're one of said side chicks, well you go and complain about where's the good guys etc? Again, why do you think mra and mgtow is a thing? Where do you think most of these guys are coming from?

Those who throw out "virgin", "bitter angry incel loner loser" as casual insults, some of them mean it, some of them are trying to hurt others, for most of them though, and let's not kid ourselves, this is political.

To those who throw out such terms, they see these bitter angry dewdz!!!! as the reason/fault as to why Senor El Trumpo is los presidente. They're not totally wrong, however, this whole altright/redpill/mra thing was going on as clear as fucking day in front of them. It's not their fault if they say and state as clear as day, which btw, happened on here, reddit, when the altright forum was still on here.

Banning them was one of the dumbest fucking things they could have done, I do not identify as such, but when you have a movement with the influence they have,controversies and all, and they are stating what they will do, elect Trump, and you have that as a resource and then ban them over some hurt fucking feelings bullshit, is beyond fucking dumb.

Of course they are contradicting themselves. Think they give a fuck? I'm not even this like arch conservative type, but to them, it's hurting Trump and the base, when the focus should be on winning elections.

I've said it before and I will say it again, the start of all of this was Elliot Rodger. Yes, he had some problems and needed help he clearly was not getting. Thing is, he was posting the videos saying what he was going to do. Now I know the internet/social media is vast and wide, but when you have someone stating they are going to do something like that, and everyone is so fucking apathetic and self absorbed to where no one does anything? Something ain't right there.

I mean, when you have something like that happen, he pretty much was the penultimate boogeyman for the ultra pc leftists who again, knew this whole redpill mra thing was happening as clear as day in front of them, yet were still in denial somehow, and the amount of well, lonely dudes who could relate, when you have it on that scale, something needs to change.

As for the whole toxic thing, yes, there are shitty people whom need to be be and are better off being told to fuck off, but when people are in denial of such, like seriously?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah there’s probably some fear around virginity. too, post Isla Vista.

This book The Beast Within Why Men are So Violent by Neil Boyd basically says all male violence is sexual. https://archive.org/details/beastwithinwhyme0000boyd?q=Beast+within

If there’s any truth to that, that mass shooters are going to be an unavoidable byproduct of loneliness, that’s terrifying. Men need to destigmatize virginity and support one another, get rid of the toxicity to one another in the manosphere.

[–]RandomAttackHelpMe0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

ALL male violence is sexual? No. I would not say that. 2 drunken dudes in a bar fight ain't doing it cause of raging male hornyness or to impress chicks. Anger and rage build up and people fight. Chicks do it too let's not forget.

Not ALL mass shooters are byproducts of loneliness, I think that is a more specific type thing. I thought the manosphere, in theory at least, was to help such frustrated dudes with these type things? I have seen non-toxic but straight forward types, Richard Cooper, Rollo Tomassi, etc. I find them not toxic but honest yet well meaning.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2023. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter