~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
Locktherockkachow
[–]Zombiedango 72 points73 points74 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Wow, something tells me they are in need of a diversity hire.
[–]Whiteys_Privilege 227 points228 points229 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Ahahahahahahhahahaha "Special measures provision of the Equal opportunities act"....
Thats the exact fucking opposite of equal opportunities...
[+]dumpin_donut11 points 3 years ago [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link
All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.
[–]ghetterking 40 points41 points42 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
it's actually something my grampa (grew up in the societ union) told me about. everyone is equal, but some are more equal. the most equal is obviously head of state for life (like stalin and lenin)
[–]Cubano1424 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Lenin, head of state for life? Lol
[–]ghetterking 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
was he not? well, to the day stalin got rid of him and became the new equalest comrade at least
[–]Magenta_mist 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Guilty until proven innocent. That’s the world we live in unfortunately, equality isn’t equal it’s bias and segregated
[–]premiumpinkgin 9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The Anti Discrimination board of Australia protects women and other minorities.
Because equality.
[–]HellsFrogs 51 points52 points53 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Congratulations your trans for the next year
[–][deleted] 25 points26 points27 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Masculine presenting transgender. You appear and act like a male, but deep inside you're a female. Boom, hired. Plus you get the bonus points of being trans and a lesbian if you are attracted to woman since you are a woman
[–]HellsFrogs 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yup that’s, that’s correct that’s the right answer
[+]Maktesh7 points 3 years ago* [recovered] (9 children) | Copy Link
This should be illegal.
[–]Locktherockkachow[S] 43 points44 points45 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
How is this considered equality
[–]Bing_Bang_Bam 17 points18 points19 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Servile cuck monarchists.
[+]Saeckel_ -80 points-79 points-78 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
By legally enforcing or encouraging the employment of woman it is possible to overcome employers solely employing man because of personal favourism or denying woman because they take parental leave, because in many countries parental leave causes expanses for the employer
[–]ghetterking 22 points23 points24 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
By legally enforcing or encouraging the employment of men it is possible to overcome employers solely employing women because of personal favourism or denying men because they take parental leave, because in many countries parental leave causes expenses for the employer.
i just changed the sexes so you can learn something today
[–]Halmesrus1 -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
But men don’t take parental leave nearly as often as women. I understand what sub I’m in but you can’t just blindly switch nouns and expect it to be a good point.
[–]ghetterking -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
because you dont live in a liberal/socialist country and men arent even given the option to. go to scandinavia and boom you'll see plenty of young dads actually spending time with their kids
[+]Saeckel_ -13 points-12 points-11 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Learn? I know all of this also applies to man but for many employers you are just some numbers and statistically woman are way more likely to have a parental leave (i wonder why), so the numbers work out in favor of employing man
I'm not a feminist, i favour equality, but when economy and society dont favour equal chances politics must intervene, you most likely live in a democracy and the chances and rights for everyone are the same, or at least should be
[–]ghetterking 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
bruh my former boss disproportionately hires women over men and it's 100% because he's a creep and a pervert. whenever it doesnt matter who does the job, a young good looking woman (more like girl) gets it. if it's an actually important job, we'll have a pretty close to 50:50 between men and women and the age average is much higher. my boss was such a loser, lusting after all those women, most of us couldnt take him seriously
[–]Sohaibali2006 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
in stem fields women are twice as likely to be hired than a man of equal experience, shut up about sexism cause it doesn't apply to women any more, also men are more likely to do overtime, retire later, take more risks. they just work more than on average than the average woman. if your such an egotistical child that you think that corporations are such boys clubs then why are they more likely to hire a woman of equal or less experience than a man?
I'm not a feminist,
yes you are, you are promoting discrimination against men.
[–][deleted] 39 points40 points41 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Which country
[–]Locktherockkachow[S] 49 points50 points51 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Australia
[–]Loemz 38 points39 points40 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Figures
[–]Candog85 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Now there's somehow something worse than the spiders in Australia
[–][deleted] 25 points26 points27 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Australia actually did blind hiring a while ago where they used an AI to pick to best person for the job. It overwhelmingly picked men over woman, so they labelled the fucking bot a sexist and went back to forcing companies to put woman who never earned their position on the board of their companies
[–]johnfitzsimons13 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I don’t think it was AI i think it was a government department using anonymised CVs so people couldn’t go off name etc. Presumably it was deemed sexist as they found that they tended to hire men as they had more experience and relevant experience
[–]TheSublimeGoose 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That may be the case, but AI is routinely labeled as sexist
[–]ghetterking 9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
somehow it's always one of them cuck commonwealth states, no offence
[–]Donnage 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
It says in the ad twice...
[–]Lazarusmp4 38 points39 points40 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
equal opportunities =/= priority over others
[–]Milktoast770 38 points39 points40 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Equal opportunity, but women get priority. Fuck this country is really going down the shitter.
[–]stinkyfart2095 14 points15 points16 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
this is australia
[–]Alqpzmyv 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
this is sparta
[–]rockcliffdesigns 15 points16 points17 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Horny__Dragon 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I just hope they don't do the same thing for commercial aviation.
[–]p3ngwin 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
oh well ...
https://qz.com/work/1741598/qantas-female-pilots-report-harassment-and-bullying/
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/travel/2018/11/virgin-australia-s-effort-to-boost-the-number-of-female-pilots-on-course.html
[–]Horny__Dragon 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Fuck
[–]p3ngwin 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yep, there're few places this cancer hasn't spread :(
[–]love_Carlotta 11 points12 points13 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
My dad works for a company with a similar sign only they're after disabled employees, what a fucking joke.
I worked in STEM for a while until I realised I was only there because I was a woman, not because I was good at what I did. So I switched to music and was asked to be in different bands during uni because they were after more diversity and could do with a female for the crowd.
This isn't a new thing and I think at the end of the day, no one wins
[–]GoodBoi_JStack 11 points12 points13 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Yes they do. Women get(often govt mandated) free attention, opportunities, and checks. Seems like winning to me.
[–]love_Carlotta 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah you're right, and that needs to stop, but feeling like an outsider because everyone knows or thinks you were only hired to fill a quota sucks too, and makes working a challenge, but at least we have a job I suppose.
[–]Solid-Perspective98 15 points16 points17 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I guess the same thing applies for healthcare and teaching professions? I'm not very good at guessing though.
[–]NegativeReward 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Most western countries seek to have a mixed gender workplace and will prioritize the genders that are in the minority, at least I assume so.
[+]Saeckel_ -34 points-33 points-32 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No, often employing woman is encouraged by the law, because employers tend to employ man more often. woman can cause expanses in case of a parental leave or they could need breaks when they need to care for their children
[–]TTheTiny1 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Aha, yes, they smort, know what equal means
[–]SharlonD 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
They do this for minorities in Canada
[–]GoodBoi_JStack 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
“Equality” just means preferential treatment...always has.
[–]Tailtappin 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
How come I never see anything like this for industries where women dominate?
[–]dukunt 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Who gives a fuck about quality now-a-days? We just care about diversity. Go get quality from somewhere else. We don't do quality.
[–]rambo77 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Start doing this with firefighters, doctors and engineers, and things will change real quickly.
[–]ghetterking 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
"we are all for diversity so we arent gonna accept over half of the applicants because of how they were born"
yeah might aswell not take any jews either, fuck em, there's too many of them already
speaking of vermin, we also wont accept any hispanics
/s
[–]Filtering_aww 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
My employer makes us take a training class to make it VERY CLEAR the best candidate for a job is the one hired, regardless of all the stuff protected by EOE. They then give an update on the women/minorities hired quota every quarterly meeting. The hiring managers have to provide extra documentation to HR every time they hire a white man to prove he was the best candidate.
[–]Particular-Soft-4633 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No surprise it’s from an ad in MELBOURNE aka CUCKBOURNE filled with SJWs and fake BLM virtue signallers
[–]liveyourbestlife83 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Wtf
[–]meat-beater_ 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Equal opportunity? More like equal outcome. The shit they hide behind these acts.
[–]Gozie5 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
LPT: "identify as a female" before to apply.
[–]Cellafex 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Great, if you write it in the jobdescription you make sure chauvinistic assholes wont apply and who wants those assholes in the workplace, amirite?
[–]Varean -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Let's be honest, train drivers just want a woman around to look at, probably
[+]that_tom_ -19 points-18 points-17 points 3 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
This is probably because they have few or no women working there. Lol not a great example.
[–]trenchgun91 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
I understand why they do it. But it's totally the wrong way to go about it, if you give someone extra chances based on gender it's both unfair to the other gender, and does not encourage people to think said woman earned her place to the same degree as the men.
That's not even getting into the fact it's literally discrimination
[–]that_tom_ 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
My niece is a truck driver and this is what it’s like at her job: There’s almost no women. If they have 100 men and one or two women in this position, making an active effort to recruit more women is not giving women extra chances lol. Women have clearly not had as many “chances” as the men, given there are 100 men and a couple women. It doesn’t sound like the men earned their chance to be there as much as hardly any women were considered for the roles, making it much easier for the men to be hired (since that cuts competition down 50%).
Men who are threatened by women in the workplace being given (kind of) equal opportunity need to grow a pair.
[–]trenchgun91 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Encouraging I am fine with. Men who feel threatend by women can go fuck themselves too, but the post literally says give them priority, that I take issue with. I'd wager the issue is more likely to be grassroots (by that I mean encouragement when younger such as in school) than it is chances, I don't understand someone who would deny somone a job for being female, and I suspect if you look at total applicants you will find the problem there rather than those accepted. So if you think that priority recruitment is not discrimination of some sort then I don't think we will ever agree frankly.
[–]that_tom_ 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
What do you call 100:1 ratios if not priority recruitment? It’s obviously a job that can be done by women, in a few years it’s going to be done without people at all.
[–]trenchgun91 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
I call it a social factor most likely. Obviously we won't agree
[–]that_tom_ 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I love that you’re so concerned about fairness... but only with respect to men.
[–]trenchgun91 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Where do you get that idea?
[–]that_tom_ 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
What about 100:1 is fair? And yet you’re only concerned that the men get a fair shake.
[–]trenchgun91 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The 100:1 thing has zero impact on what's fair. The fair or unfair part is the hiring process, which as advertised is unfair, the 100:1 is more likely a result of the typical applicant rather than the actual hiring process itself. Encourage them to be drivers when they are younger, and they will be more likely to apply, this approach has worked in my industry so there is no need for blatantly unfair hiring processes.
[–]mapleleaffem 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
How dare you bring logic and reason to this sub! They hates it!
[+]I_Drink_Diarrhea -21 points-20 points-19 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Australian Train Driver here, we have 140 drivers at our depot and there are 3 woman who work here. The industry is highly unionised, highly sexist and racist. It has been getting better but only through programs like this. They are only giving woman a leg up because the industry is terribly sexist. Half the guys here are morbidly obese and alcoholics the 3 girls we have a great workers I don't know why a lot of guys are threatened by them
[–]phishyfingers 16 points17 points18 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Because those laws never end. When the numbers change and there are only 3 men working there out of 140 drivers, they will still give priority to female hires.
Good luck friend. You've just entered the twilight zone...
[+]SharlonD -8 points-7 points-6 points 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
You sound like racists in the 50’s. It will be fine dude, hiring women won’t push men out. Just like this guy said it makes sense to try and have workforce’s reflect the national demographics. You’re literally the “they took er jobs” South Park guys. Breathe, it will all be alright.
[+]I_Drink_Diarrhea -11 points-10 points-9 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The labour laws in Australia allow for discrimination when hiring until it reflects the community, seriously why are you threatened by women in the workforce ? They have been and still are discriminated by rampant sexism in the industry. Can I ask how old you are? The whole outrage from a few males that ive seen are threatened by woman is because the are useless employees and for the most part obese
[–]GoodBoi_JStack 8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
industry is terribly sexist giving women a leg up.
industry is terribly sexist
giving women a leg up.
Well, yep.
[–]I_Drink_Diarrhea -5 points-4 points-3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
This sub is turning into r/incels
[–]GoodBoi_JStack -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Redditor: notices that specifically giving one sex special treatment is sexist.
Guy who drinks diarrhea: “You some kinda incel?
© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]Zombiedango 72 points73 points74 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Whiteys_Privilege 227 points228 points229 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[+]dumpin_donut11 points [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link
All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.
[–]ghetterking 40 points41 points42 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Cubano1424 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ghetterking 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Magenta_mist 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]premiumpinkgin 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]HellsFrogs 51 points52 points53 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 25 points26 points27 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]HellsFrogs 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Maktesh7 points [recovered] (9 children) | Copy Link
This should be illegal.
[–]Locktherockkachow[S] 43 points44 points45 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bing_Bang_Bam 17 points18 points19 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Saeckel_ -80 points-79 points-78 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]ghetterking 22 points23 points24 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Halmesrus1 -2 points-1 points0 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ghetterking -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Saeckel_ -13 points-12 points-11 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]ghetterking 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sohaibali2006 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 39 points40 points41 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]Locktherockkachow[S] 49 points50 points51 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Loemz 38 points39 points40 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Candog85 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 25 points26 points27 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]johnfitzsimons13 7 points8 points9 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]TheSublimeGoose 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ghetterking 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Donnage 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lazarusmp4 38 points39 points40 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Milktoast770 38 points39 points40 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]stinkyfart2095 14 points15 points16 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Alqpzmyv 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]rockcliffdesigns 15 points16 points17 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Horny__Dragon 6 points7 points8 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]p3ngwin 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Horny__Dragon 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]p3ngwin 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]love_Carlotta 11 points12 points13 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]GoodBoi_JStack 11 points12 points13 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]love_Carlotta 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Solid-Perspective98 15 points16 points17 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]NegativeReward 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Saeckel_ -34 points-33 points-32 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TTheTiny1 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SharlonD 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]GoodBoi_JStack 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Tailtappin 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]dukunt 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]rambo77 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ghetterking 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Filtering_aww 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Particular-Soft-4633 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]liveyourbestlife83 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]meat-beater_ 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Gozie5 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Cellafex 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Varean -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]that_tom_ -19 points-18 points-17 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]trenchgun91 0 points1 point2 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]that_tom_ 0 points1 point2 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]trenchgun91 0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]that_tom_ 0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]trenchgun91 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]that_tom_ 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]trenchgun91 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]that_tom_ 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]trenchgun91 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mapleleaffem 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]I_Drink_Diarrhea -21 points-20 points-19 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]phishyfingers 16 points17 points18 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+]SharlonD -8 points-7 points-6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]I_Drink_Diarrhea -11 points-10 points-9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]GoodBoi_JStack 8 points9 points10 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]I_Drink_Diarrhea -5 points-4 points-3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]GoodBoi_JStack -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link