~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
xXBreezy
[–]MustakaThinks breakfast food is gay sex[M] [score hidden] 6 years ago stickied comment (19 children) | Copy Link
Welcome SJWs from /r/all. We love it when you idiots show up and get all pissy about this fine sub. Please feel free to roam around and check the place out. Be sure to call anyone you can misogynist and haters. Drop in a few 'go kill yourself' as well. Of and bring your white knight tag along. Those idiots are fun to mock.
Anyways happy triggerings and thanks for the entertainment.
[–][deleted] 6 years ago (72 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]Blakesta999 808 points809 points810 points 6 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link
I’m glad the dog filter was invented though, makes it easier to weed out the idiots.
[–]SpeciousArguments 157 points158 points159 points 6 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
like tap out shirts
[–]Barnbutcher 70 points71 points72 points 6 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Or Affliction lol
[–]NewScooter1234 62 points63 points64 points 6 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Or monster energy jerseys
[–]SpeciousArguments 42 points43 points44 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
or ed hardy shirts
[–]nopersonalthrow7 34 points35 points36 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The worst is the monster logo on their car or truck. Or in my area, the artic fox logo.
[–]OhSoSorryWrongHole 23 points24 points25 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
or tumblr accounts
[–]XxFezzgigxX 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Or barb wire tattoos.
[–]Gawernator -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What if you're sponsored by them
[–]forgotaboutsteve 42 points43 points44 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Tap-out shirts are a great way to let everyone know you only get to see your kids every other weekend.
[–]lordsmish 151 points152 points153 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Looks at facebook profile picture...im just going to...errr change this
[–][deleted] 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]eaterofdog 19 points20 points21 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Buh buh buh basic
[–]Insomniacrobat 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I don't know how anyone would have that as their profile picture. It's tacky as hell.
[–]CdiLinkforSmash 78 points79 points80 points 6 years ago (46 children) | Copy Link
THOT
[–]nitrodeuce13 19 points20 points21 points 6 years ago* (42 children) | Copy Link
How do you do italics on mobile Edit: yay Edit 2: Me too
[–]Siarl_ 40 points41 points42 points 6 years ago* (39 children) | Copy Link
italics : * + word + *
Edit: yay! This better be worth it. I got banned from some sub I like for helping you!
[–][deleted] 6 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link
[–]Siarl_ 16 points17 points18 points 6 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link
I've been banned as a precaution and I've send an appeal. I hope they unban me. It's pretty weird it has been done automatically but they must have their reasons. Still not very friendly
[–][deleted] 6 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]AXPredator 26 points27 points28 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
The fact that some reddit admins are mods of those subs don't help at all. I'm looking at you 2XChromosones. Auto ban scripts/bots are against the reddit rules but if you're an admin they dont apply to you right? /s
[–]420_EngineEar 25 points26 points27 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
/r/bestof material right here. I think the only way to beat this subversion of the site rules is to raise awareness and get others on the site that don't know about it angry about it as well. I mean you can even be banned from those subs if you commented on one of their "designated hate subs" to point out how stupid and bigoted someone is being; or possibly even worse in my opinion, for sharing a dissenting view. This not only leads to their sub being an echo camber but also the ones that they don't like.
[–]Bancai 7 points8 points9 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Interesting rant read.
[–]Tauposaurus 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This is wisdom.
Edit: ...Oups I guess I'm banned from tons of plaves now.
[–]trumplethinskins 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I posted a troll comment in The_Donald that got me banned from The_D and from OffMyChest for posting on The_D...in one post.
Effective I guess.
[–]NiceSasquatch 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I've always wondered, how many liberal people have been banned for trying to debate or discuss the problems with the opposition.
A single data point, and I wouldn't even consider myself a 'liberal'. But I'm permanently banned from a conservative sub because I responded to a ranting shitpost with "one would hope to have a higher level of dialogue on this sub".
[–]Wantsomepeniscake 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I like the cut of your jib.
[–]UnWeonMas 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
So why doesn't people just make subs dedicated exactly to what the other subs are but with less stupidity? Something like /r/TrueTwoXChromosomes that works just like the original sub but doesn't ban you for participating in other subs.
[–]Kinslayer2040 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Was it 2x? Good luck.
[–]SpeciousArguments 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
commenting in /r/imgoingtohellforthis will get you banned from a few subs too
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I thought auto bans for posting in different subs is now against the site rules? Appeal it and send to the admins?
[–]Overclocked_Cheese 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Lol. The admins are om their side. They will do nothing.
[–]Stereogravy 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Really? I don't even remember what subs I was banned from automatically anymore.
I remember when uncensorednews was new because a lot of people got banned from news (including me, my articles I posted were getting popular, front page almost every other day, but I didn't make it through the ban wave that happened)
Anyway, the new sub was made because news was censoring something big, (i don't remember what, but I think it was the night club shooting) anyway, I commented in there for a bit and then stopped after a while because I stoped caring about the news altogether.
Well I get an autoban like 4 months later because it started turning into a "hate sub"
Like WTF, how am I suppose to know what subs are going to turn into a "hate sub" months from when they are created.
I also got banned from multiple subs for commenting in the kalhuahahahahaction sub to tell someone they were wrong. (I don't know what it's called because I don't read or post there)
[–]randomuser8980 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Which sub?
[–][deleted] 6 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Siarl_ 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Could you maybe link a source? I can't seem to find it myself
[–]Love_asweetbooty 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Wait, what sub banned you for helping?!
[–]Lord_ThunderCunt 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Pick one. There is maybe a dozen subs that that will ban you for participating in "hate subs" including, but not limited to, srs, offmychest, againstmensrights, blackladies, 2xchromosomes, and as I've just learned from this thread, naturalhair.
I get bonus bannings because of my awesome user name, Portland and history being a couple of my favourite bans for my offensive username.
Edit: It's not a ban for helping, it's a ban for posting here at all.
[–]Xtreme-Redditor 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
againstmensrights
Seems like the kind of people that would ban someone for having an opposing view.
[–]Siarl_ 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Some sub that doesn't like this sub
[–]DirtieHarry 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
2xchromosomes
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Which sub was that?
[–]DirtieHarry 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
He actually likes that sub?
[–]DirtieHarry 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That had me scratching my head too, but it's one of the only subs I know that uses autoban scripting for posting here.
[–]Crown_ 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
What sub?
[–]quantasmm 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
right away I thought, 'offmychest'? those rules are draconian. I got banned for confronting a guy on /r/the_d. Even confronting is support, they say. Their message will say "You must respond with <I'm sorry, I will no longer post on X>, any other response will be ignored." I won't participate on a sub like that anymore, that cure is way worse than the disease.
[–]DirtieHarry 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That'll teach you!
[–]nitrodeuce13 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Sorry
[–]nitrodeuce13 13 points14 points15 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
BEGONE THOT
[–]VitoCorleone187Um 16 points17 points18 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Were out here patrolling
[–]Tirfing88 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's like a virtual tramp stamp, I call it the thot stamp
[–]prinzklaus 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
ANY SNAPCHAT* filter. I despise them so much. It's a new way of trying to make yourself look thin. Just like how the upward angle photo was invented for the same reason.
[–]Lofty_quackers 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That's why it is called the bitch filter.
[–]tragalicious 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's always some dumb bitch with the dog thot filter too
FTFY
[–]baskura 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Amen. Always swipe these filter dicks into the trash because you know they're attention seeking.
[–]Gerden -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Basic bitch shit.
[–][deleted] 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Ok cool
[–]420dankmemes1337 -5 points-4 points-3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Do you go on /r/incels often?
[–][deleted] 278 points279 points280 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
By high maintenance, I assume that means she has none of those qualities herself
[–][deleted] 114 points115 points116 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
She doesn't have to , she's going to let you look at her all day and occasionally text you . What else does a man really need in a relationship?
[–]Bren12310 23 points24 points25 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Don't be so hard on her. She's only a smoker who drinks daily, has no job, no house, hasn't bathed in weeks, is over 300 lbs, is extremely deformed, dropped out of high school and has been to to jail 4 times.
[–]PooFlingerMonkey 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No Kids? Hmm...
[–][deleted] 557 points558 points559 points 6 years ago (67 children) | Copy Link
Dog filter. Can't say I'm surprised.
[–][deleted] 206 points207 points208 points 6 years ago (52 children) | Copy Link
Seriously. Why is that shit so predictable?
[–][deleted] 171 points172 points173 points 6 years ago (51 children) | Copy Link
Lol I just got banned from r/twochromosome for this. Seriously, what a bunch of pussies.
[–]TheGoldenFruit 124 points125 points126 points 6 years ago (26 children) | Copy Link
I hate that subreddit simply because the mods assume that just because I visit a subreddit for funny pictures or stories that I'm a sexist animal who just wants to troll their space.
Why can't I just look at funny pictures and also talk with people calmly on your subreddit? For trolls I get it, but I feel the mods are so sensitive over there.
One controversial sentence and boom, banned.
[–]popperlicious 27 points28 points29 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
same thing happens in all the ideology based subreddits, I only know of one exception to that general rule.
[–]akjoltoy -2 points-1 points0 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
altright and other truly free thinking groups never did that stupid garbage
[–]karshberlg 14 points15 points16 points 6 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link
Why would you even want to talk to those people anyway? It should be called "not quite as radical feminism as SRS"
[–]TheGoldenFruit 9 points10 points11 points 6 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link
I'm only 19 so call me not cynical enough lol but I like to at least share my ideas and have people share their ideas with me regarding certain topics. It's not so much that I think I have the right to every conversation regarding women's rights or anything similar, it's just I want the opportunity to have that conversation.
I believe that the shared ideas from either side forms the best solutions, not polarized ideas from just one.
[–]Val_Hallen 27 points28 points29 points 6 years ago* (9 children) | Copy Link
I like to at least share my ideas and have people share their ideas with me regarding certain topics
Well, that's where you fucked up, champ.
Subreddits don't want discussion. They want reinforcement of their ideas. They want people that toe the fucking line.
And this isn't just special to the "ideology" subreddit. Try going to a subreddit like /r/television and say that you think Game of Thrones is overrated. Go to /r/movies and say that Wes Anderson, in your opinion, is a hipster hack. Go to /r/games and say that The Last of Us was a boring games.
If you go to almost any subreddit and go against the grain, not even in an offensive or "trolling" way, and you will get attacked.
Yeah, some of them are worse about it than others, but almost every one of them operate this way.
Reddit is an ideology bubble.
EDIT: Banned from /r/TwoXChromosomes as soon as I posted this. And nothing of value was lost. It's honestly just the female version of T_D.
[–]karshberlg 16 points17 points18 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
SRS, TwoXChromosomes, etc were all here before T_D, even doxxing and harassing users out of reddit in the case of SRS. Reddit only got their panties on a bunch when right wing and anti-pc subreddits starting doing the same on a much lesser scale.
Oh and you were automatically banned for posting here, don't think it has anything to do with what you wrote.
[–]OldRuskiNoir 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
If I comment on your comment I get auto banned from there?
[–]karshberlg 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Didn't you? How did the test go?
[–]TheGoldenFruit 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
How do I check what subreddits I'm banned from?
[–]Val_Hallen 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
They send you a message.
Alternatively, go to https://www.reddit.com/r/{ENTERSUBREDDITHERE}/submit
For example https://www.reddit.com/r/offmychest/submit
You will get "forbidden (reddit.com) sorry, you are not allowed to do that" if you are banned.
[–]LowRentMegazord 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That's a ridiculous comparison. /r/movies isn't going to ban you for making a big long post about how Wes Anderson is the most overrated try hard ever. You can subscribe to and post in /r/fuckwesanderson and they'll still allow you to participate in the community.
You're making an absurd false equivalency.
[–]qvrock 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
There is a trollxchromosomes sub if you want, but unfortunately it's as radical and unfriendly as the one you mentioned.
[–]LowRentMegazord 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
People that fragile and pissy shouldn't be allowed to identify as trolls. That's cultural appropriation it is!
[–]NewScooter1234 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Don't forget unfunny. It's like they want people to think that women are unfunny.
(they're not, just that sub is)
[–]qvrock 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Guess you at least have to be a woman to appreciate their humor, so I can't say.
This reminds me of r/vegan as opposed to vegans irl: striking difference, but oh well
[–]karshberlg 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
They ban you for subscribing or commenting on other subreddits, so they're not interested in even hearing about you if you could potentially disagree with them (based on your subscriptions). So let them circlejerk to oblivion and then get laughed at for not living in reality.
[–]jamsrobots 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yes, this is a level headed approach to life. Extremism and cults are born in limited exposure environments. They may not be either, but it wouldn't take much to change that.
[–]brucetwarzen 7 points8 points9 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
T_D for girls
[–]_Wyat 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
/r/enoughtrumpspam does the same thing. i posted in TD to contradict a trump supporters opinion and was insta banned from ETS. no reply from the mods months later.
[–]BuzzfeedPersonified 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That's because women and white knights are sensitive.
[–]grimreaperx2 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]fucktardskunch 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
When reddit dies, it'll have been shit mods that killed it
[–]trees_are_beautiful 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Proactive filter bubbles!
[–]How_Do_I_Reddit_xD 22 points23 points24 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
r/twochromosome for this. Seriously, what a bunch of pussies.
well what did you expect to find there :)
[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Definitely not the good kind.
[–]jbaughb 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Cats, right? The good kind are cats?
[–]PwnographyStar 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
I finally got banned from there too. I don't remember what I posted there at one point but I'm relieved it wasn't in vain.
[–]bolomon7 11 points12 points13 points 6 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
I think I got banned for posting a question on r/imgoingtohellforthis . Banned for commenting on a hate sub, or some such.
[–]PwnographyStar 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
Oh damn I didn't know they ban you for posting there too. That's actually probably why I got banned 😂
[–]bolomon7 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Hmm....Im going through my history and turns out i was banned from participating in r/offmychest for posting in GoingToHell. Now Im wondering if the OP here forgot to put the X in his sub? Turns out Im not banned from /r/TwoXChromosomes yet
[–]Val_Hallen 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
/r/offmychest: Rule 2 This is a safe space for people of any and all backgrounds.
Unless we don't like your background, such as commenting in a subreddit we don't like.
[–]bolomon7 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
This is a safe space
This is fine.
commenting in a subreddit we don't like
This should never be OK.
[–]woosel 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Wait how do you check what you got banned for? I've posted in r/imgoingtohellforthis and also commented in r/TwoXChromosomes and only just found out I'm banned.
[–]bolomon7 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
r/OffMyChest sent me a message telling me specifically, otherwise i wouldnt have known. https://i.imgur.com/3giXhJt.png
[–]lightslightup 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Jesus. That's ridiculous. What if you were giving a counterargument on the 'hate' subreddit? The fear of dissent that these trigger-happy mods/subreddits have is appalling.
[–]photenth 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You haven't posted a single time in imgoingtohellforthis unless you deleted it. so no that probably isn't why you got banned. Are you really banned? I kind of doubt it. you have a very clean comment history.
[–]These_nutsghady 7 points8 points9 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I got banned as well for telling someone the hard truth but every other comment was providing fairy airy positive bullshit
[–]AlastarHickey 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It was a bot too. You could've posted here yelling at anyone here and they'd still ban you. Bunch of whiny twats.
[–]Downvotesohoy 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Report it to the admins. Didn't we just get a rule against that?
Idk, I know they are a default and I think they have an admin watching there backs, so I doubt anything would happen. I don't really care about the ban anyway, I unsubbed from their trash sub months ago.
[–]HarvestProject 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I posted a couple times in the_donald and got an Instaban lol pussies indeed
[–]ClinicalOppression 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Do you have to be invited to the sub reddit or something? I've never been on it in my life and it's unavailable
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I thought it was a default. I unsubbedd months and months ago because the content was boring and only the same subjects got upvoted so it felt like an echo chamber (pro abortion, anti male stuff, anti trump stuff(not that i care, but always the top comments are blaming him because everything is a mans fault or specifically trumps) so it got old real fast. Plus predictable posts about some slut trying not to be ashamed of whatever bad decision she made and looking for validation from other sluts who just pat eachother on the back for not having any shame . Basically just the same posts day in day out, I unsubbed quickly. Honestly don't know how they are a default or why they think they are so special that they need to ban users who sub to "hate subs" or are "problem users". They need to get over themselves
It's ok, there isn't anything in that echo chamber that you don't already know.
[–]0piat3 52 points53 points54 points 6 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Ugh
[–]Critonurmom 48 points49 points50 points 6 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Holy fuck
I hate it so much. Why is that so popular?
[–]ixlHD 76 points77 points78 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It literally filters out half of their facial flaws and i assume they also think it makes them look cute.
[–]Eustace_Savage 28 points29 points30 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Women are into infantile shit.
[–]justinismyfavorite -2 points-1 points0 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Now it makes sense. You hate women and are a pedophile. Which is why you accuse me of being a pedophile.
[–]AnonymousFuccboi 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Because it subtly modifies your face, thus making it look more appealing to you. It's not just the dog overlay, it actually does change the shape a little too. You don't really notice it, but you think you look better with that one, so you go for it.
[–]Moderationist 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It suits none of them. Maybe looks okay on the 2nd and 3rd on first column and bottom two on the last column.
[–]TiberiusPapi 95 points96 points97 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It hides the ugly.
[–]FlameSpartan 49 points50 points51 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Doesn't hide the bitch, though.
[–]resinis 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
In the 90s if you said a girl looked like a dog they would freak out and never talk to you again.
[–]mr_jiffy 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Bitches love being bitches
[–]Forcistus 1144 points1145 points1146 points 6 years ago (229 children) | Copy Link
It's funny how simply by being physically attractive makes one think they deserve all that in a partner.
[–]bababouie 63 points64 points65 points 6 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
How much you wanna bet she finds someone to take her up on her offer?
[–]Forcistus 72 points73 points74 points 6 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Most guys I'm sure will at least pretend to in order to laid.
[–]sdp1981 51 points52 points53 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Not me I'm stingy as fuck with my money, I work too hard to just hand it out. That kind of woman is basically a hooker, instead of money she just lets men barter with goods and dinners.
[–]brucetwarzen 28 points29 points30 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
You get laid before you spend any money.
[–][deleted] 15 points16 points17 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
LPT is always in the comments.
[–]Pseudonymble 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It's so obvious... but as a life strategy I don't see how they never seem to think to themselves "One day I will be less pretty, and then I will be contributing less and therefore will be more easily disposable".
[–]RedditLovingSun 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That's what the divorce money is for...
[–]Terminal-Psychosis 12 points13 points14 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Over time, "someone's" of further and further declining quality, until nobody will have her except a some desperate, lonely man, that she wouldn't have given the time of day 15 years ago.
[–]bababouie 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Then she can change then and I bet her profile will be different. I am not defending her, I'm just saying you all need to stop being so judgemental. Let people be as they be... It makes the world go round. Life is messy.
The pussypass denied is for when they take extra liberties in life (like thinking they can assault someone) and get dose of reality.
[–]Terminal-Psychosis 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
A woman that has slept with umteen men will not be as capable of settling down to a normal life as a chaste girl that fell in love from the start.
Don't fool yourself. Anyone that tells you different is NOT doing it for your benefit.
[–]bababouie 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
She doesn't need to. Your expectations of every woman is unrealistic. She can do what she wants.
[–]cruisinbyonawhim 570 points571 points572 points 6 years ago (180 children) | Copy Link
Modern feminism teaches that men should supply them with what they want, or they're not valuable partners.
While of course, having a good job, being healthy and fitting some areas will make a relationship more stable, being equal and honest with each other will make it a whole fuckload better than some washed up cunt who will end up cheating on you anyway.
[–]aboutthednm 260 points261 points262 points 6 years ago (41 children) | Copy Link
Eh, I'd like to think men and women can be equally entitled and stuck up.
[–]Princess_Wannatoke 230 points231 points232 points 6 years ago (30 children) | Copy Link
yeah, but you don't see men lookin for sugar mommies as much as women lookin for sugar daddies
[–]Reasonable-redditor 110 points111 points112 points 6 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
You don't see women looking for subservient sex slaves as much as men either. Different stereotypes.
[–]ScenicFrost 57 points58 points59 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Very valid point.
[–]Godspeed311 7 points8 points9 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I would be interested to see the number of men looking for sex slaves vs the number of women looking for handouts.
[–]DarkLorde117 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I dunno man. I'm getting into MRA and MGTOW, but let's be real. There are a fuckton of incels and neckbeards out there doing the exact same thing (setting unrealistic standards while holding themselves completely unaccountable).
[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Definitely not equal, though. One half of these analogies require much more work. Societal norms will always have this imbalance, because one half of the population seeks attention for entitlement, while the other half tries to raise their societal status for entitlement.
[–]CaptainDouchington 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I just want a slutty maid...is that too much to ask?
[–]Moonwlkr50 10 points11 points12 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Sex slave? Or women who really like sex? 2 very different things. Being a sex slave is a lot of work and probably a traumatic experience. But the other is just a normal relationship with a lot of sex, and nowhere near as toxic as literally pretending to love someone for access to their money and status.
[–]k-NE 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I don't know, man. It's hard for me to even walk into a woman's house without suddenly becoming her sex slave.
[+]Redox80 -13 points-12 points-11 points 6 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
I'd have to disagree. There are plenty of men out there looking for an easy ride using their looks to get by. Pretending stuff like this is a one gender issue is kind of ridiculous.
Edit. lol. to think i knew what sub I was posting this and still posted it! keep on jerkin' it my fellow men I'm sure reality will shift if you slap each other hard enough! The sad truth is that there are boatloads of men willing to fuck old ladies <reverse anna nicole smith> just so they don't have to work. Deal. With. It.
[–]Princess_Wannatoke 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
pretending there isn't a large imbalance between sugar daddies and sugar mommies is just retarded
stereotypes exist for a reason
[+]comosedicewaterbed -79 points-78 points-77 points 6 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link
Bullshit. Half the guys I know are trying to marry a rich girl
[–]brucetwarzen 38 points39 points40 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Bizzaroworld
[–]HailSlaytan 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Toa payoh
[–]Princess_Wannatoke 71 points72 points73 points 6 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
and who made that rich girl her money?
most likely her rich-ass father, who was at one point a sugar daddy
[–]GreenSnowday 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Shit I wish
[–]FunkSlice 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Do you only know 2 guys?
[–]oO0-__-0Oo 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Oh, they absolutely can be.
Narcissism is not a gender specific disorder.
[–]FlameSpartan 33 points34 points35 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You would be correct.
[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
They can,but when you compare the number of delusional woman like this one and man i think woman numbers will win by far.
[–]dslybrowse -2 points-1 points0 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
If you compare it instead to men who want their women to be idealized sex workers/maids, it's not really all that different. The genders 'value' different things in that regard, but both sides can be equally shitty towards reducing the other to it.
Very good point and point of perspective I gotta say you are right and it makes sense male shitty part of side when you put it like that. But still what we do with that are God damn hormones that just make you crazy this is just pure bitchy entitlement.
[–]XanderPrice 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
How many fat ugly guys have ridiculous expectations in a partner? How many fat ugly girls have ridiculous expectations in a partner?
[–]DamonHarp 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
There's a whole subreddit dedicated to neck-beards. There's a meme that revolves around the ugly guy that wants to own beautiful women
[–]truth_sentinell 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's bad manners to mention something and don't put a link to it.
[–]Indoorsman 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
They can, but it's way more common and socially acceptable for a woman to demand that in a man and have people support her on it.
[–]DionysusMA 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
DAE modern feminists hate men lol
[–]Forcistus 160 points161 points162 points 6 years ago* (67 children) | Copy Link
I think it's more than just modern feminism. This is an instance where I would say it falls more on men's objectification of women. Sort of like a pretty girl syndrome, if you will. You develop physical attractiveness at a young age and men don't mind what you're putting out, they simply want to fuck you. I've seen it for years. No matter what she says or does, they're are going to be dudes telling her she's special and coaxing her ego into the narcissistic dragon it's become simply because of sex appeal. What incentive does a person have to develop character, empathy, or personality when they face those kinds of circumstances.
I think this is far more a result of how men treat women than misguided feminist philosophy.
[–]imoblivioustothis 38 points39 points40 points 6 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
I would say it falls more on men's objectification of women.
or the last decade of pop culture telling young girls he better have a JOB, or PUT A RING ON IT, or whatever monetary value women have been trained to put on men. women don't do this, they live in reality. dipshits like this who think their pussy is worth something do this.
[–]Forcistus 25 points26 points27 points 6 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
"He better have a job" is simply the contemporary version of the strongest man getting the women. This isn't due to pop culture. Wealth is the new power. In terms of a woman's survival, a man better have a job if he's going to court her. That means she will live in relative comfort, have good health, her children will get an education, etc.
Of course, you would think that would work both ways since she could easily attain an education and a worthwhile career of her own but there are many women who have high expectations for their men without demonstrating anything beyond sexual attractiveness themselves.
[–]grnrngr 14 points15 points16 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Getting sidetracked and OP didn't deliver the main thrust of this "empowerment" debate: women have been told not to "settle."
Any fault in a man is considered "settling." And women are being told they don't have to "settle."
Men, on the other hand, are being told to respect women as complex human beings. And if they can't do that, then they don't "deserve" said women.
It's all over the media. Been that way for 20-ish years.
[–]dslybrowse 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
To be fair isn't this just a rebound off the way it has been for the prior X years? "Your husband deserves your best" kind of thinking of the WW1-2 era? Men were to keep their wives in line, working for their benefit. Women were to keep their head down and bear the inconveniences that came with the privilege of being with her man.
Obviously not advocating/reminiscing about either.
It's interesting, as I near 30, the way your view of the world, other people and yourself changes with time. Relationships are a completely different thing to me now than they were 5-10 years ago (obviously, perhaps).
[–]grnrngr 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
To be fair isn't this just a rebound off the way it has been for the prior X years? "Your husband deserves your best" kind of thinking of the WW1-2 era?
I'd like to think this is just an innocent rubber-banding, but I don't think it is. And even if it was, the entire point of the feminist movement in the 60's and 70's wasn't to "get even," it was to "get equal" - they'd have been against this sort of rubber-banding.
Instead, I think what we are seeing is a confluence of marketing and advertising co-opting the feminist movement. "Empowerment" has in many areas become "lip service." And women are eating this shit up.
Sidenote: And, sadly, on the other end of the spectrum, men are eating up advertising going the other way: "you're a primal animal - feed your inner beast: buy ten midnight crunch wraps today!"
[–]imoblivioustothis 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
i'm not saying so because it's MY situation. i'm lower middle class, graduate educated, fit and conventionally attractive. I have no problems meeting and engaging women. In both of my fields of work i see the same tropes though. One in the bar, one on the collegiate campus.
[–]whydog 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Wanting her man to have a job doesn't mean she doesn't have one of her own.
There's a tendency for successful women to seek men equally as well off or better off than she, whereas the other way around is less common. It's one of the reasons why educating and employing your country's women is important economically.
[–]Forcistus 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Fair enough, but I didn't mean to imply that that was the case. There certainly are women who are successful and expect their partner to be motivated and responsible as well, and a good source of income is an indication of this.
[–]owenwilsonsdouble 16 points17 points18 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Can you pay the bills? Can you pay my telephone bills? Can you pay my automo-bills? If you did then maybe we could chill.
[–]Reasonable-redditor 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Lol if you listen to the song she has her own money (the car which he doesn't own, spending money which he asks to borrow, maxes out her credit card, uses her cell phone minutes).
Get your head out of your ass. She is asking to pay the bills because he is using all her shit dumbass.
[–]owenwilsonsdouble 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Ah I didn't know. Just only know just the chorus from radio, never really listened to the song. Sorry buddy.
[–]jamsrobots 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
When all you bring to the table is your looks, you better get a contract that extends beyond the fleeting beauty. Pretty much, never marry a girl like this because what she brings to the relationship will eventually fade and then you're stuck with someone that is ugly all the way through.
Heheh, I don't let it get that far. I'm sterile and tend to get bored in a matter of months regardless of the situation.
[–]Terminal-Psychosis 42 points43 points44 points 6 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link
It is a lack of strong father figures, teaching their girls to stay chaste and lock down a good husband for the long haul.
Something rad-fem ideology is explicitly against, mind you.
If so many girls are taught by this "culture" to be proud of their sluttyness, see it as somehow a virtue.
The weakening of the family, degradation of old-fashioned family values is to blame here, not the natural sex drive of either sex.
Don't blame boys for indulging them. In today's modern societies we see this attitude all too often... blame the males. It is sad, and only amplifies the actual problem.
Teaching girls to look to the future is vital. Where will they be at 30? With 300 notches on their belt, declining beuty, and crying "where have all the good men gone?",
or will they work on actual life skills, including good relationships, and building a happy family life on a stable base? If we want things to change back for the better, it is vital to impart this deeper understanding and the wisdom of delayed gratification on young girls.
And also, yes, teach young boys to have standards. Putting pussy on a pedestal is a surefire way to be used and abused, especially in our "modern" institutionally sexist societies, where the courts and laws are horrendously biased against men.
Sadly, this sane and sound common sense is the exact opposite of what feminism preaches. :(
[–][deleted] 24 points25 points26 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
staying chaste
Okay that might be a little extreme.
What they need is to not be given everything they want and to sit the fuck down and be humble.
[–]grimreaperx2 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Niederweit 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Although modern feminism, as it is these days might be cancer... To think that people didn't cheat before is crazy. These days you have DNA testing, facebook and all those other things that makes communication possible.
It used to be taboo.. It's just that people are more open about it these days. Women/men willing to leave if they get cheated on, whike back in the day it was just the way is was.
Yes we might have gone overboard, but it's not like the 60s were any better.. These things are swinging motions back and forth. There's already a reaction with the right gaining traction., just look at why Trump was elected... And once they fuck it up we'll all go left again. History repeats...
The Romans fucked young boys, so did the greeks... That was normal back then.
[–]grimreaperx2 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Forcistus 8 points9 points10 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I wonder where anything in the image implies sluttiness. In fact, judging by her criteria for the type of man she wants, one could assume that she actually has good standards from men. This is usually where you strong father figure argument comes from. She is saying that not just any man can have her, they have to exhibit these characteristics which is not in fact sluttiness.
Radical feminism culture is not as pervasive as you think in mainstream culture. Most people don't have any idea what it is and most people don't use it as a justification. Promiscuity has been along long before radical feminism came into existence and a woman's choice to take on multiple sexual partners in her life can be for a plethora of different reasons that have nothing to do with radical feminism. There is such a thing as recreational sex.
And the notches on her belt at any age she might be is irrelevant to her worth as a human. Is It not possible that one could have good life skills, a good education, be an intellectual, read, socialize with one's community in a positive way and also have had sex with 300 people? A reasonable person will see that having sex with multiple people has nothing to do with one's character. There are good, worthwhile people who have loads of sex and shitty people who have none.
If a woman, and the society at large considers a woman's only worth her physical attractiveness, then yes, as that declines she is in trouble as she continues to compete in that society with younger and/or more attractive women. Clearly there are more important factors to a person's character, which I am sure you would agree with, regardless of whether you are a man or a woman.
In my opinion, the only thing the girl in this image did wrong is come off poorly. Something is extremely off putting when someone immediately starts listing to you have you need to prove yourself worthy of them without displaying any worth of their own. There might be further conversation that we can't see, but it appears that she expects him to prove to her he is worth her time without displaying any worth of her own. Nothing to do with radical feminism, nothing to do with sluttiness. Just poor communication skills.
[–]dslybrowse 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Agreed. She could be a nice person. I have my own standards after all, about women I'd consider dating. Where she falls flat, is the fact that she thinks it's both reasonable and somehow virtuous to flat-out list them.
I would NEVER propose even a single one of my "criteria" to a potential date. Not even something as innocent as "you should probably like cats, because I have two of them", because that's not up to THEM to fit my preconception of some perfect partner. Go get to know them, learn if they do/don't enjoy cats, continue dating and/or part ways. Get to know the person, not just their 'stats'. At that point all you're doing is artificially limiting the number of people you might potentially enjoy getting to know.
[–]cruisinbyonawhim 42 points43 points44 points 6 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link
You're right in a way, but it cannot be denied that all the progress that has been made, hasn't really been for the better. Women's rights are all fine and dandy, but this is a perfect example of what has gone wrong. Some think they are entitled to this.. Special treatment, that if they don't get it, the guy isn't worthy to her. They are taught that through media, social circles, etc etc. It's not black and white by all means, but it's pretty hard not to deny that feminism has had its part in making some pretty horrible, shitty women.
[–]Forcistus 83 points84 points85 points 6 years ago* (15 children) | Copy Link
Nah, women who are shitty due to feminism display a different sort of entitlement. While the girl here is definitely suffering from a false sense of entitlement, this isn't the sort that any feminism I've ever heard of breeds. This is standard egomaniacal behavior for someone who's sex appeal is given too much power. She's not this way because she's a women, and I feel she doesn't hold too much onto the title woman. She's like this because she's sexy and just about every man she's ever known has been trying to fuck her since she was 14. That's where this type of over inflated 'too good for you' ego stems from.
My thoughts, at least.
[–][deleted] 6 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Reasonable-redditor 7 points8 points9 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Well you are only talking about a Western women and the only power is in sexual manipulation so the whole pint of feminism is to establish value as an individual that is inherent.
[–]fahque650 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
What this means is, men will advertise their dicks to just about anything, and women are the gate keepers that decide who comes in and who doesn't.
Well, to be fair, if something goes unplanned they are the ones on the hook for an abortion or a baby.
[–][deleted] 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]fahque650 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Legally obligated lol.
[–]Terminal-Psychosis 21 points22 points23 points 6 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link
Behavior fully encouraged by Feminism's "you get yours gurl!".
What they don't tell young women is, when they are 30 and have had sex with dozens, even hundreds of men, and their looks are fading fast... they'll have nothing to fall back on except
blaming and shaming attempts against men, like you are repeating. :(
[–]Forcistus 7 points8 points9 points 6 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
I'm not shaming men, nor placing the blame fully on men. The woman is a free agent is she is able to make her own decisions about her character, just as anyone else is. But, just like anyone else, the influence of her environment play a role into the person she will shape up to be. This behavior can be observed is not the result of feminism telling people to go get yours, or whatever. There is a component to many feminist ideals that encourages sexual freedom and experimentation amongst women, many of it from great thinkers of feminist, but this is not that. This is simply a narcissistic person who holds her own self worth far to highly simply because she is attractive. Not necessarily because she is a woman, but because she is attractive. And people do not simply decide they are attractive on their own. No, years, if not decades went into foster this attitude here. I say men are the cause because she's obviously heterosexual and men have undoubtedly been stroking her ego in their attempts to sleep with her and she has responded negatively to that. Men are not to blame for how she turned out, she is. But men contributed and, in this case, I am doubtful that any sort of feminism had much to do with it.
[–]letsgocrazy 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I agree fully.
The fact is, narcissistic men and women existed before feminism, so feminism cannot be the cause.
[–]Terminal-Psychosis -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
Feminism disagrees with you. :(
Men are the cause, which is what you seem to be repeating by singling out and defending the actual perpetrators.
On the other hand, today's "modern" societies fully condone "narcissistic" behavior in women, while villainizing men, merely being men.
Both may have always existed, but the planned destruction of family values that kept them in check so long, to the benefit of society, is nothing but harmful.
Ironically, to women as well as men. And especially to the epidemic of fatherless children that is the result. :(
[–]letsgocrazy 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You're just wrong.
Narcissism has been around forever. No one denies that.
She's like this because she's sexy
Yes, and the old-fashioned family values feminism is so against in promoting slutty behavior directly harms women, for exactly this reason.
Such society wide constructs such as marriage etc are to keep women from following that nature, to the destruction of the family, children, society, and, especially in sexist modern societies, the poor husband, whom the police and "justice" system will abuse to no end, in favor of single women (and their unfortunate children). Government in our "modern" nations has taken over the roll of provider, robbed men of it, and worse. This is by design. :(
many of it from great thinkers of feminist
Your idea of "great thinkers" is directly what is leading to the destruction of civilization. It is what they are condoning. Calling them "great thinkers" only points out your sexism, and will to destroy any civilized society.
Attractiveness is a commodity. It is one men have too, but mainly one that women find of infinitely more value.
To teach young girls to squander this in the time they have it is incredibly harmful. This is what the cult of belief-based feminism preaches.
A man is required to be more. Actually, women are also, if they wish to have a happy family life (something so core to womanhood). Again, this is something the rad-fem factions completely neglect to explain when they promote full-on pretending to be a man, even shaming women in school for their natural preference for a healthy family life.
Again, yes, It is also key to teach young boys that pussy is not to be put on a pedestal. This is also something feminism is completely against. They completely work against any strong masculinity, calling such "toxic" and other such shaming attempts.
Please, don't put the horse before the cart. There is only one issue here.
Girls will be as slutty as society allows, and boys will take advantage of that as much as possible. This is human nature.
It is not our nature that is at fault, it is the breakdown of society that is. Feminism is a key tool in this destruction. Not the cause, but, like the politically correct "culture" so pushed in media and schools, a destructive hammer breaking apart healthy family life. The problem here is that "society" has been poisoned by the ridiculous notion that this is a good thing, by the ones that promote such destructive ideas, such as feminism represents.
Equality of opportunity has been achieved between the sexes. There is absolutely nothing holding women back, and they have far more choices than men in our "modern" society. They are allowed to work part time, have children, and even royally fuck over the father once they're done with him.
This lunacy has gone far too far. it is destroying family life, in favor of corporate and government backed control. The government has taken over the provider roll, leaving women to their will.
So, so many fatherless boys... it is an epidemic, and attitudes like yours are the result. :(
[–]Forcistus 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'm going to try my best to remain passive and polite but your, what I'm beginning to expect is intentional misreading of my comments is making it difficult. As are your passive aggressive frowning faces. If we have any further discussion, I'd ask that you don't make such wild claims about what you assume are my supposed beliefs or intentions since you have the benefit of consulting me here. If there is something you want clarification on, just ask and I would be happy to elaborate further. Anything else, I believe will distract from a positive discussion. I have been respectful to you, all I ask is that you return the same courtesy.
You bring up slutty behavior very often in your most recent comment as well as in your original comment. I'll ask again: what slutty behavior do you see exhibited in the original post? The woman in question only list what she looks for in a potential partner. And her list is reasonable and is not even implicitly slutty by any stretch of the imagination. If anything, with the exception of the high maintenance comment, I'd say what she wants in a partner would probably fit into the family value paradigm you speak of. She is being selective in what appears to be a positive way, so I would like you to elaborate what you find slutty before you continue using that in our conversation.
You took my quote "many of it from great thinkers of feminist." You misunderstood that sentence, it seems. That sentence is preluded by an existential quantified; that is to say "some". This means that there ARE or WERE great thinkers of feminist philosophy. This is not to say that anyone who has a feminist philosophy is a great thinker or even that there are a lot. Just that there are some. If you would deny that, feel free to correct me.
You also accuse me of sexism, which I feel I can fairly assume is meant to be towards men. Speaking with neutrality, this would mean that I am discriminatory or prejudiced to men for the sole fact of based on their sex. You also say that my comment about their being great thinkers in feminism is what illustrates my sexism. To be honest, I'm not sure how you relate those two things so I'll allow you to explain it to me. How does me saying there have been great thinkers in feminist philosophy make me sexist? For that to be true, you are assuming that these great thinkers in feminism are all one sex, women. Who said anything about that? There are men who have contributed to feminism. There are men who are feminist thinkers. Being a woman is not required to be a feminist. On this fact alone, your accusation makes no sense, though I found that it made little sense on its own.
You are correct, attractiveness is a commodity that men have as well as women. I have not denied that nor does saying men can be attractive change or add anything to what I said.
Everything else you said was kind of rambling and it is hard to cover all of the points on my phone so I'm not going to right now. If you want to continue speaking, I will be happy to later.
[–][deleted] 6 years ago* (18 children) | Copy Link
[–]_Sinnik_ 22 points23 points24 points 6 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link
That isn't at all what he's saying lmfao. He's saying that men relentlessly pine after attractive women, like this one here, which disincentivizes development of character, empathy, independence, etc.
Really it's her fault and her fault alone for not developing any sort of character, but desperate "yes men" and men who will put up with anything to get laid certainly don't help. He is not, by any stretch of the imagination, saying it's "men's fault," but rather partially a byproduct of a prevalent behaviour in men.
[–][deleted] 6 years ago* (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]_Sinnik_ 7 points8 points9 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
"This is an instance where I would say it falls more on men's objectification of women."
Ah shit. You're right, I can't argue with this quote. This is a strong point.
"What incentive does a person have to develop character, empathy, or personality when they face those kinds of circumstances."
That's simply him explaining the way the mind works. I would explain it in the exact same way. This phenomenon affects rich kids too. And nobody's blaming the yes men for shitty rich kid attitudes.
"I think this is far more a result of how men treat women than misguided feminist philosophy."
Well this one could certainly go either way. I mean the context is really really important. The guy he's responding to is saying it's feminism's fault and he's responding by saying "I think it would be more a result of objectification than it would of feminism." Or he could intentionally be ignoring the fact that it's mainly the women's fault because he doesn't believe so. Could go either way.
And yet after blaming men a few times, nowhere in his comment does he shoot straight and say "it is her fault."
This could easily be because it's sort of an "obvious unsaid." Like he's simply not mentioning the part where it's the woman's fault because it's so obvious it doesn't need mentioning. Orrrrr you could very well be right and he may be blaming all of this on men. Overall, I'm not so certain anymore and I wouldn't really defend him the same way if I were to do it over.
with your generous interpretation.
You may very well be right.
[–]Forcistus 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I'm not blaming men. I'm basically saying what your original interpretation of my view was lol.
I do never say it's her fault in the comment quoted because it didn't seem necessary..the poster above me was accusing feminism's influence and my view was... well, you read it. But obviously these outside factors are clearly only influences and ultimately a person's decisions and character are their own responsibility. I'm just speculating as to why one would become this way. I thought my comment about incentives to develop into a worthwhile person covered that but I could have elaborated more in retrospect. I did not realize that I would need to explicitly say that she is master of her soul to not be accused of giving her a free pass. A pussy pass, if you will.
People are just reading what they want into it. Nowhere did you come across as placing this at the feet of men. "How men behave around beautiful women" is absolutely the reason for her behaviour, some people just can't read that without taking offense to it as if it's a criticism of men. It's not (or, doesn't have to be).
[–]Forcistus 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
Thanks. It can be such a pain discussing things with people online when you have to cover every single angle of your argument so they can't paint your intentions with their own brushes.
[–]_Sinnik_ 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Gotcha. That's what I had originally figured, but the other poster made me second guess that notion. Thanks for clearing it up
[–]Forcistus 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
You can read the rest of my comments here to see what I'm saying. But it should be clear by my original comment that I her responsible for her actions. I'm not blaming men in those comments you quoted, I'm saying their influence on her development was negative and in my opinion a much bigger factor than feminism. Ultimately, she's the one who makes her decisions just like anyone else, but the way our minds works and the decisions we make are influenced by our environment. I'm just speculating to why her ethic is the way it is.
[–]LowRentMegazord 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
I'm not blaming men in those comments you quoted,
You literally say things like "This is an instance where I would say it falls more on men's objectification of women" but keep telling yourself that.
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
When all else fails, blame men. Honestly, I expect nothing less at this point.
[–]Forcistus -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Do you read or do you just see what you want to see?
[–]LowRentMegazord 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Why don't you explain what you were actually saying in those quotes, since I'm just an illiterate moron who thinks that words have meaning. Saying shit like
"I'm not blaming men"
immediately followed by
"I'm saying their influence on her development was negative and in my opinion a much bigger factor than feminism".
So you're saying the negative influence of men is a big factor in her behavior. I guess the most important question would be: what does "blame" mean to you? Hopefully you'll able to refrain from becoming a complete internet cliche and not quote the dictionary at me. If you can't define a word you shouldn't use it.
"I'm just speculating to why her ethic is the way it is."
Why her ethic is the way it is. Or, in other words, what the cause is. Or, in other words, where the blame lies.
Do you read what you type?
[–]dslybrowse -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
Stop just doubling down. Stop, and breath. Reread their posts from a point of view of "this person honestly isn't blaming men". See if you can understand that, hey, you actually can read it from that point of view. That interpretation of the words written does in fact exist.
You will absolutely see that the slant you're reading is entirely self-generated. If you insist on finding some evidence of man-hating, well you're going to see it in every negative comment about men. But that's a preconceived notion, that YOU are bringing into this.
Don't get defensive about it, just try it.
You can replace "attention from men" with "attention from lesbians" or "reinforcement from fellow women about her looks". The criticism here is on what the attention does to a young woman's mind and has NOTHING TO DO WITH MEN explicitly. Men are just, by and large, the number one source of that attention for a straight woman.
[–]_Sinnik_ 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Good points. Still, at the end of the day it's the women's fault for developing shitty personalities. If we were to ignore that effect, we'd simply be perpetuating the shitty dynamic were both criticizing here.
[–]DarkSoulsMatter 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You can be the cause of something unintentionally. Ignorance is bliss
[–]IHaTeD2 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You should outgrow that after puberty though.
[–]Indigo_Monkey 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This is a perfect explanation I think
[–]DerTrickIstZuAtmen 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You develop physical attractiveness at a young age and men don't mind what you're putting out, they simply want to fuck you.
Connie?!
[–]frakistan 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
A good point, did not thought of it that way. That is why I think its is very important for girls to have a strong father figure that will reward on getting good grades rather than how far you can deepthroat
There's one dude at my work straight up buying everything for some girl who hasn't even expressed interest in him. Fucking niceguys do that shit.
If I was a woman, I'd just whore myself out. Building character is way too much work compared to seeking attention.
[–]tothecatmobile 14 points15 points16 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That is hardly an invention of modern feminism.
[+]comosedicewaterbed -9 points-8 points-7 points 6 years ago* (18 children) | Copy Link
You have no understanding of feminism
Edit: Christ, you neckbeards are impossible. Bring on the downvotes. I'll still defend gender equality from you sexist pigs. Sorry the pretty girl didn't like you back in middle school and now you jack off four times a day.
Signed, a man.
[–]SoupToPots 28 points29 points30 points 6 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
He's talking about modern feminism, or tumblr feminism.
[–]comosedicewaterbed 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
That's not a real thing. I have never heard of a self-identified feminist, in real life or on the internet, self-apply the label "high maintenance".
[–]SoupToPots 11 points12 points13 points 6 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
There's a difference between a woman wanting equality between men and woman, and a woman who wants to be a princess put on a pedestal.
[–]comosedicewaterbed 8 points9 points10 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
You are correct, and women who want to be put on a pedestal don't call themselves feminists, generally.
[–]SoupToPots 8 points9 points10 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, they're the ones that complain about things like wage gap and societies standards.
[–]comosedicewaterbed 12 points13 points14 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Striving for social equality is not asking to be put on a pedestal.... y'all have some messed up views on women.
While I'm at it, where in the OP did the woman in question claim to be a feminist? Why was feminism even brought into the conversation?
[–]tofur99 7 points8 points9 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
They already have social equality, that's the point...they aren't actually interested in being equal.
[–]MunchenOnBundchen 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Women do not get paid less than men. That's been illegal for over 40 years. Women are more likely to choose lower paying jobs and be stay at home parents. They're also significantly less likely to demand a raise, but more likely to be rewarded. I'm not sure what that says about feminism or societal values, but it's not an issue that is represented correctly. I think it all just comes down to parenting. Girls are more likely to be treated like a princess and have their whims catered to by their fathers, no matter how well meaning. Men are generally raised to be more self sufficient. If we want equality, which we all should, we should raise all children the way we raise boys in our society (obviously not all parents do this, but it's really common). When you see a woman chastising her man or slapping him or throwing a hissy fit in public, it's because it worked with daddy and it worked with all of the guys who only wanted to get in her pants since she hit puberty. Their parents didn't want to see their little girl upset and bred a type A personality, that only looks to get what they want without care or consideration for the ones they're looking to get things from. I don't think women are inherently narcissistic, but I do think many have been unintentionally raised to be so. If your parent caters to your every whim, you'll be selfish, regardless of gender.
[–]Goomich 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
So tumblr feminism is old fashion feminism?
[–]SoupToPots 7 points8 points9 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
no, old feminism got things done, like the rights for woman to vote.
[–]metatronsaint 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
old feminism=women deserve the same rights as men
modern feminism=women are superior beings and they shall be revered. all men must live just to serve women, otherwise they are useless and they better die.
[–]Olli399 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Fucken Chad :|
Seriously though this makes you look like a holier-than-thou cunt
I don't think you know what "equality" is.
Defending women's right to treat men like shit isn't "equality," it's sexism.
[–]Liftinbroswole 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
You want a nuanced opinion of feminism appearing on a sub called /r/pussypassdenied I love this sub but dawg come on
[–]_Sinnik_ 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Eh, that isn't really relevant. One can still call out misunderstandings or misinformation even if such misinformation should be expected. I don't really get what you're saying honestly. Since the user above shouldn't expect a certain level of accuracy, they should then not call things out as inaccurate? Doesn't make any sense
[–]DarkCircle 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I don't think this is much to do with feminism at all and more to do with the way some (possibly a lot of) women are today. I've not seen any sources marked as feminist that tell women to want an impossibly long list of requirements from men.
Some women just have really high estimations of their self worth and what they have to offer. I've literally had an obese woman try to talk down to me, like I would be luck to get her (after dodging her at every opportunity), or a woman that is pretty thick and so so attractive act like she is God's gift to men but manages to run off boyfriends pretty quickly. These people want the earth but have next to nothing to offer, not even basic companionship.
It also has to do with the increasing amount of 'choice' women have when it comes to dating, provided by dating apps and media providing them with an endless conveyor-belt of potential men. When it comes to getting men, women have far more immediate easy choices compared to men. They learn not to value them and become far more picky then they 'deserve' to be based on their attributes.
I have seen a few similar stories like this one of how a, now married couple, met. They guy was as good as it gets in terms of looks for men. Handsome, exceptional physique and he seems like a good guy and a possibly great father. His wife with great physique was also attractive but I think he beats her out by a bit in terms of looks. When they met, she nearly blew him off just because she did not feel like giving him a chance, he was just below 6ft and she liked tall guys. She was also recently out of a relationship so not in the mood.
I've heard so many more stores like this where they guy, although having visibly excellent attributes, has to convince her to give him a chance when she should be at least curious to see if they are compatible. Depending on the time of day, her mood etc she might turn down a guy that looks really good on paper with the certainty that another one will come.
Having options present themselves and pursue you, makes you more picky.
I'll still defend gender equality from you sexist pigs.
This is going to be a productive discussion.
[–]58working 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
Women don't need to be taught that. Any anthropologist worth their salt will tell you that hypergamy is fundamental to female sexuality. Most female primates just go into heat and will allow any male to mate with her - the selection pressure comes from males physically fending one another off for mating privileges. In humans it is biologically completely different. A woman does not display any physical sign of her ovulation, so the men never know when they are fertile - The selection pressure comes from female preference and they almost always select as high up in the social dominance hierarchy as they are capable of getting (which means across and up in terms of social status, women very rarely date down).
Our genetic record shows that we actually have twice as many female ancestors as male ancestors for this reason.
[–]Shovelbum26 -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
Just FYI, I'm an anthropologist and you're very wrong on your science there.
First, the predominant theory I'm aware of for human's evolution of concealed ovulation is a defense against male infanticide, which is very common in other apes.
Second, I am aware of no studies that show cross-culturally (i.e. a fundamental species wide trait) that women show very strong (or any) reproductive preference for men based on perceived social status.
[–]58working 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Just FYI, I'm an anthropologist
No you aren't. You would know better.
[–]Shovelbum26 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Yes I am. Check my comment history. I talk about it regularly. BS in Anthro from App State, MA in Anthro from ECU. It's also part of my username. "Shovel bum" is a term for a graduate student in Archaeology (you're poor and move from job to job digging).
Seriously, try it some time. Go to an Anthro conference and pass around a poll that states, "True or False: Hypergamy has been proven to be a fundamental trait in Homo sapiens."
I guarantee you get an avalanche of "False".
[–]58working 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, I don't buy it. That is completely counter to the consensus of evolutionary psychologists and social learning theorists. There is no way the consensus among anthropologists would be different.
It's also so damn obvious and prevalent, how could it not be the case that women would value productive capacity and social capital, whereas men value youth and beauty? It's a winning evolutionary strategy. The burden of proof is on those that negate such an obvious predicate.
There are plenty of studies into this that a cursory google search brings up, of women trading off physical attractiveness for social status, though I can't say if any of them are cross cultural.
[–]Shovelbum26 -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link
It's also so damn obvious The burden of proof is on those that negate such an obvious predicate.
It's also so damn obvious
The burden of proof is on those that negate such an obvious predicate.
That's not remotely how science works. It is, in fact, the literal opposite of how science works.
You've just proven you have absolutely no clue what you're talking about. Please stop giving scientists a bad name pretending they support your pet ideology.
Also evolutionary psychology is not very well regarded in most sciences, including actual psychology. I personally, as an anthropologist, think it's kind of a joke.
You know what, why don't you go to /r/AskAnthropology and see what they say. Don't take my word for it.
[–]58working 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
I have a degree in physics, so I'm not certain what the inner workings of soft sciences like anthropology look like. We can't run a universe simulation and so must rely on speculating about ancient things that are dug out of the ground, so a lot of it is probably wrong. There is a huge window for political correctness to influence the consensus in 'sciences' like anthropology, unlike in the physical sciences.
Women overwhelmingly value men who are tall, men who have jobs (particularly jobs that are well respected or high paying), men with a supportive social group. Common objects of fantasy are celebrities (even ones who aren't objectively attractive). I can't imagine how someone could not accept hypergamy as self evident unless they were the ones with a pet ideology. How many women would date a short unemployed man with no friends, even if he had an amazing face and sense of humour? It would have to be a damn good face to make up for the lack of social standing.
[–]Shovelbum26 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I can't imagine how someone could not accept hypergamy as self evident unless they were the ones with a pet ideology.
You have a degree in physics and yet say things like that? You don't start from an assumption and say it must be disproved. That's, as I said, the literal opposite of science. You should understand that.
And clearly you have very little or no understanding of how cross-cultural studies work in Anthropology. I saw in your profile you're a programmer, so not a research scientist. That's not surprising. I am, I work at a public research university. So you can make subtle digs about "soft science" all you want, but one of us does research for a living and the other one does not.
How many women would date a short unemployed man with no friends, even if he had an amazing face and sense of humour?
Lots. It happens literally millions of times a day, every day. This is honestly a pretty weird thing to say. It's so trivial to prove that short unemployed men not only get dates, but successfully reproduce, again and again, many millions of times a year.
And I absolutely despise this frame of view. It makes women out to be a depreciating asset. It further reinforces the belief that all women have to offer is physical attractiveness which can't be healthy for anyone. Eventually, we all get old.
[–]Saendre 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
... being equal and honest with each other will make it a whole fuckload better ...
That's what modern feminism is about. You were referring to some overhyped Tumblr bullshit in the first paragraph.
[+]TheFlamingLemon -6 points-5 points-4 points 6 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link
What do you mean by supply them with what they want here? Because a person has a partner who doesnt sufficiently supply them with the attachment/fulfillment a romantic partner usually ought to then I see no reason why they would be wrong in leaving that relationship. A person is correct to avoid relationships in which their emotional/romantic needs will not be met.
[–]_Sinnik_ 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
He didn't word it properly, but I'll explain. He means to say that modern feminism is teaching women to have far too high expectations and to offer little in return. Sure it would make sense for somebody to leave a relationship where their needs aren't being met, but if they expect the world in exchange for very little, that isn't really realistic. A man or woman should not be expected to wait on somebody hand and foot to ensure their maximum possible happiness at every moment, or be subject to every whim of their partner regardless of its price.
I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with his sentiment, just explaining it.
[–]Olli399 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Is it sexist because I like angel over buffy because it has a male main character? - Steve Shives
Yes. -his wife
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What I see is that the woman in question is trying to cash in on the traditional societal norms of men being the sole provider while double dipping in modern feministic themes such as walking all over the man unchecked. I.E: the "If you can't handle me at my worst then you don't deserve me at my best" attitude that seems to be so rampant in today's society. Feminism has done a lot of great things in the past, but it mutated into something that breeds a sense of entitlement. I think since folks felt the need to be 'more innovative' and 'progressive', they actually created more problems.
The thirsty guys that feed this egotistical behavior play a role in this. For every guy that won't put up with the bullshit, there are dozens who would become human doormats just for a little action. Instagram and other forms of social media changed the game as well. Now, everyone can be even more narcissistic prior to the introduction of liking pictures.
Both sides have a lot of unhealthy expectations of the opposite sex. If folks are looking for something long-lasting, they need to put in the work and 'invest' into the relationship.
[–]Terminal-Psychosis 8 points9 points10 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
What you are saying is what rad-fem teaches.
The man is replaceable, completely. He is to supply your dreams and ambitions, with no thought as to what he gets in exchange. Marriage, the white picket fence, all that. Or simply wild adventures... the man is completely objectified, an exchangeable actor in their fantasy.
Long gone are the days of charm school, building character, and looking to the future. Feminism preaches "get yours Gurl!", and neglect to tell young women that they are squandering their youth on instant gratification.
Then when they are 30 or so, they wonder "where have all the good men gone?"
The good men were snapped up by good, faithful and wise young women in their 20's, that are now living a happy stable life.
[–]TheFlamingLemon -3 points-2 points-1 points 6 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
I never specified if the "person" I was referring to was male or female. It applies to both sexes.
Also, feminism isn't trying to tell women to go and seek instant gratification in their youth, it's just advocating that women who do choose to do that shouldn't be shamed or treated as though they are less valuable because of it. Now, whether you agree with that idea, that women should be free to sleep around, etc. without social consequences is another matter entirely. Personally, I think people should be able to do what they want with their bodies freely, and I don't see why a person who sleeps around and enjoys life that way would be regarded less well than a more conservative person. It just comes down to how each person wants to run their private life.
[+][deleted] -9 points-8 points-7 points 6 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link
How do you know if a sub is alt-right?
This has 200 upvotes.
[–]Olli399 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link
Please tell me how this is alt-right
[–]Secretly-a-cat 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
If you didn't vote Hillary and are a straight white male you are literally worse than an actual nazi, come on man you should have learned this by now.
[–]Olli399 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Oh shit I am that
I tell you what I'm not though
American 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
[+][deleted] -8 points-7 points-6 points 6 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link
It's typical, alt-right anti-feminist nonsense.
Thinking "Modern feminism teaches that men should supply them with what they want, or they're not valuable partners." is actually correct is the equivelant of leftists thinking that the Republican healthcare plan is murdering off the poor.
They're both ridiculously stupid and heavily-uninformed things to say. What modern feminism actually does is teach women to be self-reliant and proud of themselves.
[–]annul 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
so, it's correct then?
[–][deleted] -4 points-3 points-2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'll just be honest here and tell you that I have no idea how to respond to this.
[–]Olli399 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
Ok so attacking based sargon is making women powerful.
Right... 😐
[–]cruisinbyonawhim 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
Alt-Right!?
Hahahahah, oh man, I didn't think that disliking what a load of shit modern feminism is, is being alt-right.
Sniff some more glue, hoser.
[–]cfaqzz -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Who hurt you?
[–]cruisinbyonawhim 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'm sorry to hear you like being walked over from women :)
[–]Bensas42 -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Feminism, both modern and past, aims for a more independent female figure, what you're talking about is just mysoginism, the opposite.
[–]apullin 10 points11 points12 points 6 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
you should visit the SF bay area some time. The "being physically attractive" isn't even really required.
[–]FoxMcWeezer 8 points9 points10 points 6 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
10 guys for 1 girl. And the guys are more or less the same kind of person.
[–]owenwilsonsdouble 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Why is that? Why such an imbalance?
[–]tofur99 9 points10 points11 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
tech industry, heavily left leaning politically.
[–]owenwilsonsdouble 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Well the first bit makes sense, but do left-leaning areas have more men?
[–]tofur99 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I don't know but the city attracts lefties who are pretty similar in their views on a lot of things, adds into the observation that everyone is the same. Lefty tech guys.
[–]apullin 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
There's also the effect of many of the women who "live" here only really "living" here part time, 1-2 months per year. The rest of the year, they are traveling the country and the world on an essentially perpetual vacation, bankrolled by their parents or by their many, many suitors. That is just how it goes here. Many women will have 3-10 partners, who they'll rotate through travel vacations with.
[–]owenwilsonsdouble 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Huh! Interesting!
[–]dantemp 7 points8 points9 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's cause a lot of them get it. I honestly can't remember any guy ever saying "I really want her to my girlfriend, she has a real nice personality", unless he is being sarcastic.
[–]No_More_Shines_Billy 32 points33 points34 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
That's because she's used to getting what she wants. Being an attractive woman in western society is the next best thing to winning the lottery. The world will cater to your every whim and you'll never need to work for anything.
[–]sdp1981 35 points36 points37 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Until you get old and then have no way of dealing with the hardships of life.
[–]DirtieHarry 7 points8 points9 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Cue depression.
[+][deleted] 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]x0y0z0 16 points17 points18 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You're trying to give pussypasses on r/pussypassdenied
[–][deleted] 21 points22 points23 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It's called the sexual marketplace and they are not wrong
[–]Forcistus 12 points13 points14 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Getting something because you deserve it and getting something are very different things.
[–]NiceFormBro 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Don't get me started
[–]CoolingtonBeans 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Too late
[–]somerandomguy02 10 points11 points12 points 6 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link
eh, that's a pretty standard list minus the "must open doors" demand and "high maintenance" part.
Hardly picky. She just listed out the qualities of a decent human being who has their shit together.
She's acting like she's something special for requiring that her partner be a decent human being. The funny thing is, most men who are going to sugar daddy her high maintenance and very expensive lifestyle are not going to be any of the other things. She's going to be a side chick.
[–]JedEckert 42 points43 points44 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Her phrasing of it, "good income," and your phrasing of it, "has their own money" are not the same thing at all. You chose to ignore the most egregious things about the list to try to be a contrarian and make a point.
Obviously the worst thing(s) about her list is that she requires a rich guy. The majority of the other things are irrelevant, and no one is arguing otherwise.
[+]somerandomguy02 -6 points-5 points-4 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Because everyone's definition of a good income is different. I want a mate with a good income too.
If you'll look, I toned down the whole list a little bit to point out that it's just a run of the mill "not a douchebag and has their shit together" list where she's acting like it's something special. She's not picky at all with the exception of spend more money on me than I can spend on myself.
Honestly, she belongs in r/ChoosingBeggars/
[–]crazyraisin1982 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
A mate? Lol
[–]Forcistus 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, at face value the list is reasonable and is exactly what most people actually want. But there's something off putting about actually listing it. The context of the image is that she's basically telling him to come correct or fuck off without actually displaying any self worth of her own.
But you're right. There actually is nothing with anything she says, funnily enough
[–]Ilubalu 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
You do well to translate what she said, but you do badly to not translate "high maintenance" and "expensive". You say the other things mean "has their s--- together", but you're not admitting that all those things together still mean "All I care about is me me me me me me me".
"High maintenance" means "likely to raise hell over little things and likely to be unyielding even if logically unjustified". In other words, she wishes to be treated like a bratty princess who usually gets her way. I'm not saying this is morally bad, but it's wrong to suggest it is good.
Another omission of yours is her honesty in describing herself as "expensive". This suggests rather strongly that love is a very, very conditional thing for this woman, which means directly that it isn't really love she is looking for. Everything in the list is self-centered. All the stuff about treating others and animals well and holding doors... it all means "I wish to be treated with the ultimate gentleness all my life". The woman never gives any indication that she has a role in giving (well, at least, in this excerpt we get here). Just imagine getting into a discussion with her in which logic and honesty are needed. Will she think? Will she offer her honest admission to truths when that is needed? I doubt it. She sounds like a very unproductive hurricane, an obstacle, a trouble maker, a lot of noise and headaches. Again, I'm not saying it's morally wrong. It's simply her terms.
Again, to use the house-for-sale analogy, it's not really a matter of right or wrong; it's a matter of who is willing to agree to those terms. Seems to me like a horrible deal, but there's some sugar daddy out there with a fortune looking for a trophy wife to hang diamonds from. It really isn't unreasonable for her to try to get one of them, but I think we need to admit that this is what this is about.
[–]Niferwee -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Dam did I have to scroll far to get this. I don't think her list is even that bad either. Most of them are characteristics are things any decent human should have already. Holding the door and being a dog lover isn't even that far fetched. Okay maybe if she expects you to always hold the door. The only thing that irked me was that she self proclaimed that she was high maintenance. If she didn't say that I wouldn't think it was that bad
Most of that list is pretty normal stuff though and she was fully up front with being high maintenance. I'd still run but plenty of other girls out there hide that shit until they lock you in.
[–]Thatweasel 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What ever happened to that whole love thing where you'd end up with someone you just kinda meshes with based on complementary worldviews and perspectives
[–]dublinclontarf 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
"I have a pussy, give me shit".
[–]Arcon1337 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Don't even need to be attractive to think you deserve that when you're a woman.
[–]resinis 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No duh. That's what having a vagina means. They are princesses. They are literally told that from birth.
[–]sgfocpk[🍰] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I don't understand... she said nothing about her deserving this due to her looks, you can't even make her face out in her profile picture... maybe idk she thinks she has a lot to offer and is looking for someone who she sees as an equal? Yeah this is obnoxious behavior but why assume it's based on her looks?
[–]GourmetCoffee 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The worst part is that society just accepts women being this way but does not condone men behaving similarly.
Women are okay to act entitled and feel like they're a catch for having nothing.
Women will throw around the "I'm working at..." insert losing weight, getting a job, being less of a cunt, but a man doesn't get to be "Working at..." anything, if he doesn't have it, he's just a deadbeat in their eyes.
[–]Elanthius -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I mean, apart from the last line they're pretty reasonable expectations.
As I'm looking at it, that may have even been a poorly received joke.
[–]megablast -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
There is nothing wrong with aiming high!
[–]Mathewdm423 119 points120 points121 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
"Oh sorry I was looking for an adult who knows how to take care of themselves like a normal person"
[–]Pseudonymble 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
LOL... wouldv'e been a nice item if he had supplied his 'List'
[–]Surtysurt 283 points284 points285 points 6 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
What makes women think they deserve those things? If you have expensive taste have a good job you leech
[–]jhaluska 119 points120 points121 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
And expensive tastes is not the same as good taste. It just means their self esteem is linked with having to own status items. I hate when people try to flaunt a weakness as a strength.
[–]Surtysurt 37 points38 points39 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
It's pretty obvious when the price difference is so drastic in mid to high end products. You're telling me that this watch is $100 is several times better than my batman watch when I was a child, but not even 1% as good as a rolex? Fuck off, it doesn't cure cancer, it has some common gems.
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I never understood how some people spend crazy amount of money on a watch, just how some people buy expensive wallets...
[–]kermit_was_right 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Purely a status display item, like jewelry in general.
[–]SMTTT84 7 points8 points9 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
when people try to flaunt a weakness as a strength.
"I graduated from the school of hard knocks"
[–]fartloud 15 points16 points17 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What makes women think they deserve those things?
because a lot of them get away with it just fine. and quite often men want just that, to take care after a woman. just because this one listed all of the reasons, doesnt mean a lot more men arent taking care of similar demands, the demands are just never literally named.
supply & demand and all that jazz.
if you can get away with stupid shit, someone will definitely be doing that regardless of how immoral or stupid that shit is and regardless of what kind of stupid shit that is. applies to all sorts of areas in life.
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Immaturity. For some of them it's a phase and it goes after their 20s, some of them stick to it. Unfortunate for them in the first place.
[–]THUMB5UP 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Social media and dating sites. Any woman with a working mouth and pussy gets messages 24/7 from a plethora of thirsty men. After experiencing this, most women (even the fugly ones) begin thinking they are God's gift to man.
That's my hypothesis anyway. ¯\ _ (ツ)_/¯
[–]itsalreadybeenthrown 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I see tons of dudes who want to "spoil someone" which I think is kinda weird too. Let them have their preferences and find each other, it doesn't affect anyone else.
Honestly better she states it up front than to drop a bomb after a few (expensive) dates.
[–]lxaex1143 -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
How do you know she doesn't have a good job? She just might want someone who is able to go out and do expensive things a lot.
[–]jroddie4 178 points179 points180 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
you can't play hard to get if you're hard to want.
[–]activator 29 points30 points31 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This is a good quote, I'm borrowing this
[–]Pseudonymble 8 points9 points10 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, nicer than the similar 'Pretty outside, ugly inside' quote.
[–]evesea 50 points51 points52 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I appreciate the honesty. Put up the red flags BEFORE the date.
[–]Whitlow14 118 points119 points120 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Basic bitch.
[–]drylube 17 points18 points19 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
bitch wants a sugar daddy
[–]Whitlow14 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Fucking makes me sick.
[–][deleted] 27 points28 points29 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
"And what do you bring to the table?"
"My 6/10 looks and vagina of course!"
[–]Carsinogenic 173 points174 points175 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I like his style!!
Get that man a cookie!
[–]InsaneZee 23 points24 points25 points 6 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
Mirror please!
EDIT: MIRROR, ALTERNATE, REHOST, IMGUR, whatever word you use to CTRL+F lul
I had to sort comments by new to find this buried comment.
[–]000OOO000OOO_spooky 20 points21 points22 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I like how she included income twice
[–]socialadder 18 points19 points20 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Capable of handling a high maintenance and very expensive woman
Translation: I'm fucking crazy and hate working. Also buy me things so I won't be as crazy.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
Translation: get me all the expensive-ass dinners, clothes, and jewelry I want while I leech off you.
[–]mastermark555 51 points52 points53 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Thot patrol
[–]princeapalia 15 points16 points17 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Pretty reasonable until the last line. That's codeword for "I'm a massive bitch unless I get exactly what I want"
[–]Drezzzire 158 points159 points160 points 6 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Opens doors for me, good income, 'I'm a high maintenance, expensive woman.'
Uh so she's looking for a wallet as most women are-move along.
Women like that are worthless and will only have 2-3 kids with you then take you for child support before updating her tinder profile with 'and two angels in my life who you hafta be 'man enough' to accept.'
Bitches used to crack me up.
Now it's just pathetic and sad.
Find the good ones boys.
Fucking needle in a haystack, but find em.
Either that or responsibly fuck them and LEAVE them.
Do not let these women turn you into an ATM.
Women have successfully turned themselves into nothing more than 1 night stands with their immature, selfish mentalities.
[–]These_nutsghady 27 points28 points29 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I feel like this could be turned into a lil Wayne song
[–]Goldswitch 12 points13 points14 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That last line is fucking powerful. Really appreciate this perspective.
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Drezzzire 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Your mom.
But in all seriousness, it's really takes an unintelligent person to presume another person can't have a rational, logical viewpoint without some emotional turmoil attached to it.
In fact, that's a huge difference between men and women-men can form logical ideas and conclusions regarding situations, circumstances and scenarios they haven't experienced themselves.
Whereas most women are viscerally (emotionally) motivated. They react to what effects them and are more apathetic toward things that don't.
Ridiculously, when a man expresses discontent or disgust regarding women's actions, he's labeled as a loser who is 'hateful, spiteful and misogynistic.' Told to 'quit whining. He doesn't deserve women anyway and he'll die lonely with that mentality.'
Yet if a woman expresses her discontent or disgust with men's actions 'omg poor girl. Those evil men. How dare them act in such a way. You don't need them. You deserve better. You're a strong independent woman'
Laughable
[–]lagspike 12 points13 points14 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
-income prioritized before education, health, and honesty
begone, thot
[–][deleted] 36 points37 points38 points 6 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
expensive woman
Is it normal to feel hurt, as a woman, when women objectify themselves?
She is talking about herself like she is a toaster. Ouch.
[–]Goldswitch 9 points10 points11 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Can't answer that for you. What I can say is that women who call themselves expensive usually have the least 'substance' and are in my mind the 'cheapest'.
On that note if a women starts talking money on the first date that's a red flag.
[–]Pseudonymble 12 points13 points14 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
...Unless she's giving quality stock tips and responsible money management. Fuck that's hot
[–]taggadem810 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Great, now I have an erection
[–]Pseudonymble 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Porno Film Project: "Spank my Bottom Line". OPENING CREDITS, Cut to; Interior, Restaurant, Evening.
LEAD-MAN: "So, would you be interested in coming back to my place for a, uh, 'nightcap'?" LEAD-LADY: "Nothing would excite me more, unless of course you collect your receipt first so that you can deduct this meal as a business expense under TaxCode Line 386.b" -CLOSE-UP OF GROWING ERECTION- LEAD-MAN: "Great plan, but no time" -CUT TO; SEX SCENE#1-
[–]Damjo 8 points9 points10 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I have more respect for my toaster. At least my toaster is useful in the kitchen.
[–]throwheezy 46 points47 points48 points 6 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
To be fair, she didn't say attractive.
So there's that
[–][deleted] 13 points14 points15 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
well they did have to match for this to happen so she must have somewhat considered him attractive
[–]Drezzzire 21 points22 points23 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Money overrules all in women's minds. Thought most men knew that by now.
[–]joker38 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Impulsive golddiggers!
Yeah, health, good genes and ability to birth have traditionally been the main requirements for a women to be a suitable partner. These traits are all directly associated with how attractive they are. While men have been required to be able to provide and protect. These traits nowadays are associated with income, stability, willingness to put up with your shit, etc.
And when I say traditionally, I mean the thousands of years before we built international (or even national) communities where the primary goal of every single person was getting their community to the next generation.
[–]BigMax 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
If I had a nickel for every woman who found me unattractive, they would eventually find me attractive.
[–]touchet29 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Not always important if they can buy you whatever you want.
[–]redditbsbsbs 23 points24 points25 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
High maintenance - okay. Very expensive - not okay.
[–]ratchet41 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
At least she knows and admits she's high maintenance/expensive.
[–]moyako 8 points9 points10 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I met a girl like this when I was in college. One time she was pissed, arguing with his boyfriend over the cellphone because he was saving money for a car and didn't want to pay for her a boob job.
I just couldn't believe it.
[–]stationhollow 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Ah yes. The old "get you to pay for the things ill use to attract yo7r replacement" technique.
[–]HeyitsFerraro 22 points23 points24 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The Slayer of Taylor.
[–]Jmeud 12 points13 points14 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
She got beat down with the bam hammer of karma
[–]peanutismint 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Lol is she using a dog filter in her profile pic? That would've been my first and only required red flag....
[–]floccinaucin 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Honestly, most of that isn't too much to request from someone.
But then tacking on income, "deal with my unreasonable shit", and no excessive drinking is taking it too far.
[–]Shoryuhadoken 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
fuck hygiene. i shower on saturdays only. people should like me for my natural scent.
[–]WDMShredz 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Uhhhhhh...
[–]ghostoutfit 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
If only there was an app that would pair women like this with men docile enough to actually pay for their love. Hmm… 🤔
[–]polini46 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
and she has a fucking dog filter
[–]realstekcor 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
The dog filter for some reason makes girls go up at least 2 pts on the attractive meter. Very deceiving. The thing is they know this and actually think it counts. It doesn't.
[–]Shoryuhadoken 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
remove dog filter, myspace angles and make up and you wonder why you even bothered.
[–]biggoof 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I don't understand bros that put up with this and marry someone like that. I really don't get it when the chick ain't even close to being hot.
[–]firetroll 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Meh they get trolled by their dick. Dicks always make irrational decisions when horny. Dicks are a gateway drug to child support, bad marriages, luggage, emotional stress.
[–]Bren12310 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Lol, educated. You can't demand for someone to be something you're not.
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Money better spent on a plane.
[–]QuantumPhoss 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Why is she "expensive"? Is she a whore?
[–]bluetruckapple 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Better get a job you thot-kin.
[–]Damjo 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Why would any man want to be with a woman who self-proclaims to be high maintenance and expensive? Who on earth wants to date a fucking irritating leech?
[–][deleted] 14 points15 points16 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Gotta just give up on women. Just not worth the effort anymore.
[–]thecarolinelinnae 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
There are more good women out there than you think - it's just that the bad ones get exposed more often so men think that's all there is.
[–]xChinky123x 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You do that
Stop with this R/incel trash.
This is awesome. Both of the final replies were classic.
[–]chambertlo 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Good for him.
[–]jondrethegiant 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
High maintenance is code for "unable to respect personal boundaries and space" and "egomaniacal duche monkey"
[–]TrizMichelle 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
My criteria looks like this:
kind and sweet.
I don't really ask for much in a partner...
[–]firetroll 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
So is she like a escort or something? She mentions very expensive?
[–]Factushima 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
All women have a list of demands. They aren't worth knowing if they don't explain what they offer as well.
[–]manloveworld 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Looks like those recruitment ads for interns.
Required Intern for 3 months. Must have 6 years experience.
[–]thecarolinelinnae 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
My fiance is all of those things except I am not a high maintenance, expensive woman. And if I was, he would not be with me.
[–]JoelMahon 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's a shame because literally everything but the last one doesn't make you look like a bitch Imo. That and the dog filter if you got rid of both of those you'd only have to be cautious.
[–]Grayphobia 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Everything until the end is pretty reasonable under the umbrella of "Being a successful person" which isn't uncommon to be or expect.
[–]pussycatmando 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
OMG tinder is gone to hell
[–]KaiRaiUnknown 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I mean, people can argue about this, but what is she willing to offer in return?
[–]firetroll 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Maybe expensive parking pass.. to her pussy.
I mean...as long as she is good with a prenup and BJs whenever I want I'm good with that. Good to know where we stand in the relationship
[–]Raoh522 17 points18 points19 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
To be fair to her, that's not exactly an uncommon list of things people want in their partner. Everyone wants these traits. These are like the basics of what to expect from someone in a relationship imo. Just the last part and the door holding is a bit outside of the normal.
[–]Lokiem 21 points22 points23 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I'm not so sure, most people don't treat their romantic side of life as a business transaction.
You meet someone, you click, and everything else is pretty much secondary or lower.
[–]Raoh522 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I'm not sure listing it in the form of a list like this is normal. But I know I would expect of a partner at the very least what I have. And most of that stuff there goes without saying. Now if they said "I don't work so you need lots of money." that's different than looking for someone with a decent job so you won't have issues getting by etc.
And as far as clicking. yeah that's the ideal. But just clicking with a person doesn't make them a fit person for you to date.
I don't need a romantic partner to be a job interview. I can take care of myself and as long as they don't need me to support them we're good.
Everything there was fine, the primary issue was the final part she sneaked in there. Almost no one here has an issue with the rest of her list, they look pretty reasonable to me, as long as she also has the same values.
[–]UnPawsed 11 points12 points13 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
This is the most redpilled /r/Tinder comments section that I've seen.
/r/mgtow boys.
[–]Sourcesurfing 7 points8 points9 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Slowly but surely more and more will find the light.
[–]truth_sentinell 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I hate when subs don't explain what their fucking abbreviations mean. What does mgtow mean
[–]ShiningConcepts 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Stands for Men Going Their Own Way. In a nutshell, it's men who abstain from all relationships (or at the least long-term ones) because of onerous family court systems, false rape accusations, unfair custody/fertility laws, etc..
[–]TwoPointZero_gpa 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Damn, I thought this was going to be an actress from the show High Maintenance
[–]charizardpoop 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Got eeeem
[–]kbarney345 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I couldn't care less about half this stuff and I've meet plenty people like this but it's the money ones that piss me off. You can high standards even make it mandatory to be 6'5" from Harvard and it wouldn't matter. But these greedy hoes who have no skills or talents just want to be useless all their life blow my mind. Thanks to my dad being a handyman I've learned tons of little skills and bits of info that will help me through life. I feel girls like this will only add sex to the life of the person they meet. No happiness adventure or a real relationship more a undefined prostitute
[–]JohnnyHopkins13 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'm very high maintenance and sophisticated. And I like to use dog filters on my profile pictures.
I always think of the cinema sins guy saying "burrrutal" to stuff like this.
Savage
High maintenance should only be tolerated if they are high performance.
[–]sh1ftyswar 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
my last girlfriend was a raging cunt but phenomenal in the sack...it was nice about 10% of the time
[–]mrBatata 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
/u/xXBreezy Can you post her reply?
[–]bcrabill 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'm sure she's absolutely none of those things.
[–]orr250mph 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Honey - your pussy aint all that. /
[–]NiMaD83 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Pic is down
[–]MarcusAustralius 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
If you are looking for an image, it was probably deleted.
Looks like I'm a high maintenance woman, because I just got denied.
[–]ybeaver7 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
She probably doesn't fit that criteria, has roast beef lips, and a dirty asshole with no income and a child
deleted What is this?
[–]quebec_meth 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link
YEAH THAT'S WHAT YOU GET BOOOOOM BITCH GET OUT THE WAY ... U GOT DISSED BY THE REALEST. BIIIITCHHH RESPECT YEAAHHHHHHHH... HARD WORK
https://youtu.be/HSVltEYE6V4
[–]tigertrojan 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
sorts by controversial
SECTOR NOT CLEAR NOT CLEAR
[–]thechosenwonton 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Boom, headshot.
[–]autourbanbot 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Here's the Urban Dictionary definition of high-maintenance :
Require (ing) a lot of work/attention to maintain. Require (ing) a lot of money or attention to appearance. Require (ing) a high emotional investment or en excessive amount of money. EXAMPLES OF HIGH-MAINTENANCE BEHAVIOR: -Having frequent professional cosmetic consultations, such as hair-dressing, manicures and pedicures -Excessive worthless spending (tricking) -Attention craving -Being too delicate or suavé
Require (ing) a lot of work/attention to maintain.
Require (ing) a lot of money or attention to appearance.
Require (ing) a high emotional investment or en excessive amount of money.
EXAMPLES OF HIGH-MAINTENANCE BEHAVIOR:
-Having frequent professional cosmetic consultations, such as hair-dressing, manicures and pedicures
-Excessive worthless spending (tricking)
-Attention craving
-Being too delicate or suavé
NOTE: high-maintenance is primarily used to refer to attractive straight women or a person/people that's stuck on self.
about | flag for glitch | Summon: urbanbot, what is something?
[–]Thinccing 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Image not working, anyone got a mirror?
[–]SickOfIt518 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
In search of the unicorn man who either doesn't exist or wouldn't give them the time of day. When are people going to learn?
[–]hollybegin 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
She forgot humble....
Someone should punch her right in the cunt
[–]GearyDigit 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Honest question, what was so amazing about this that over 11,000 of y'all thought it was grade-A content?
[+]danielunited -8 points-7 points-6 points 6 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
How is that pussy pass denied?
[–]firetroll 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That pussy was too expensive?
[+]xChinky123x -14 points-13 points-12 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's not, this sub just got invaded by mgtow
[+]ThePonyMafia -11 points-10 points-9 points 6 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
No drugs, Excessive drinking or smoking? Really in this day and age?
[–]SadlyIamJustaHead 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
Comments like this are exactly why that's an appealing trait.
[–]ThePonyMafia 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
I don't mean to say that everybody does those things, it's just when looking for a partner that's not something you really rule out.
[–]SadlyIamJustaHead 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
It absolutely is.
I'm the sort to be as petty as ruling out eating fast food, not mostly drinking water, and the amount of times you go to a starbucks a month. So to me things like "are you a drug user?" and "are you an alcoholic?" are pretty big potential issues.
[–]ImOutlawTorn 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
So you're fucking boring and trite. Got it.
[–]SadlyIamJustaHead -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Or health conscious and not addled with vices.
But to each their own. I never said anything negative about the way you do your own stuff. No reason to insult me unless you're that insecure. I've found that your type tends to project society's dislike of you onto other people, for some strange reason. But whatever makes you happy, I guess. :)
[–]ThePonyMafia 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link
I was mainly focusing on the drinking and smoking aspect, it really depends on what she means by excessive. Plus a lot of people accept weed for what it is nowdays. I mean i don't smoke often (and when i do its not tabacoo), and i can handle my drink. So to me as its sort of a norm and i hang around people with to not be bothered by anything like that.
But of course everyone is entitled to their own preferences, this one was probably one of the more reasonable ones.
[–]SadlyIamJustaHead 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, weed's super mainstream. I watched some youtube shitumentary about suburban moms switching from boxed wine to weed. Was entertaining. :)
I was taking my own personal interpretation of excessive, which was just anything besides weekends. You can binge the fuck up if you want friday/saturday, it's just too impactive to do on weekdays, imo.
Apparently that makes me boring and trite though so.... /shrug
[–]ThePonyMafia 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Well yeah man, if you want to hold a job you can't exactly go in to work UTI lol.
I'm cool with whatever anybody wants to do, drink, not drink ect. As long as you don't act all high and mighty about it either way, (Not saying you did or anything, but i've got a friend that does it a lot)
[–]SadlyIamJustaHead 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link
UTI?
And glad you didn't take it that way. I was just stating my dating preferences, which are worlds apart from my "people I would like" preferences.
I mean, if you're going to eventually be around this person so much, you should probably have some input on recreation habits, smells, mental state, etc. I dunno. Maybe I'm old fashioned.
Then again I dated a little pothead once and she was goofy as fuck after smoking so it was kind of cute. I guess I could get used to it.
[–]ThePonyMafia 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
UTI - Under the influence.
And yeah i gets you. Guess it really depends on what you want in a partner, I mean nobodies perfect but your obviously allowed to have preferences which will include if they like similar hobbies or have certain traits. Often times if your both adults about things you can talk things through.
[–]SadlyIamJustaHead 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
You're a reasonable dude. Have a toke for me, since I don't. :)
[+]brand-new-day-_- -16 points-15 points-14 points 6 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
Minus a couple things on the list, I honestly don't see what's wrong with her saying this? I mean the qualities she listed, other than the high maintenance and like two other ones, sounds like what most people expect in a partner.
[–]SadlyIamJustaHead 9 points10 points11 points 6 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Exactly. And most people ARE these things, or would never admit to not being these things.
It's the fact that she feels the need to list them because she's "picky" that suggests that her interpretation or expectations of it are so out of whack with the reality of the terms that no rational person could actually meet what she's looking for and would have constant drama on their hands. Or, that she's lacking one or several of them, so sees it as a goal to strive for. Or, etc. etc. etc.
Numerous red flags on play.
[–]brand-new-day-_- 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
If someone's asking what you're looking for or what kind of guys you like, making a list like this would be easier. I'm not arguing that she isn't high maintenance but op did ask.
I think "normal human being" is default enough that you don't need to include it in the list.
I mean, she's not going to say she wants some STD ridden lying whore of a guy, is she? It's implied.
The only "unique" thing there is the straight edge, money, and her bullshit she put at the end for a reason. Which just means that she has weird opinions about recreational activities and is a gold digger.
[–]brand-new-day-_- 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
I wouldn't say not wanting someone to be a heavy drinker or drug user is weird if you yourself barely drink and don't use drugs. Some people just don't want that kind of lifestyle around them.
[–]SadlyIamJustaHead 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Oh, it's not weird at all. I mean, I agree with it personally.
Still a unique view in today's day and age.
[–]brand-new-day-_- 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
The whole straight edge thing?
[–]SadlyIamJustaHead 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Technically what's she's looking for isn't straight edge. I just like the term.
I just don't like drugs, smoking and try to limit my drinking as much as possible.
But yes.
GASP!
LOOK WHAT YOU"VE DONE!
[–]iamacannibal 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Notice how the guy in the OP only mentioned the one thing being bad. The high maintenance and expensive woman.
He seemed to not have a problem with the rest because they are all reasonable.
[+]Teller8 -12 points-11 points-10 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Capable of handling a high.... no drugs.
Am I missing something here?
© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]MustakaThinks breakfast food is gay sex[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (19 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (72 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]Blakesta999 808 points809 points810 points (14 children) | Copy Link
[–]SpeciousArguments 157 points158 points159 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]Barnbutcher 70 points71 points72 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]NewScooter1234 62 points63 points64 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]SpeciousArguments 42 points43 points44 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]nopersonalthrow7 34 points35 points36 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]OhSoSorryWrongHole 23 points24 points25 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]XxFezzgigxX 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Gawernator -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]forgotaboutsteve 42 points43 points44 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]lordsmish 151 points152 points153 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]eaterofdog 19 points20 points21 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Insomniacrobat 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CdiLinkforSmash 78 points79 points80 points (46 children) | Copy Link
[–]nitrodeuce13 19 points20 points21 points (42 children) | Copy Link
[–]Siarl_ 40 points41 points42 points (39 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (21 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]Siarl_ 16 points17 points18 points (20 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (12 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]AXPredator 26 points27 points28 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]420_EngineEar 25 points26 points27 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bancai 7 points8 points9 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Tauposaurus 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]trumplethinskins 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]NiceSasquatch 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Wantsomepeniscake 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]UnWeonMas 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Kinslayer2040 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SpeciousArguments 6 points7 points8 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Overclocked_Cheese 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Stereogravy 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]randomuser8980 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]Siarl_ 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Love_asweetbooty 1 point2 points3 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lord_ThunderCunt 5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Xtreme-Redditor 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Siarl_ 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DirtieHarry 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]DirtieHarry 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]DirtieHarry 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Crown_ 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]DirtieHarry 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]quantasmm 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DirtieHarry 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]nitrodeuce13 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]nitrodeuce13 13 points14 points15 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]VitoCorleone187Um 16 points17 points18 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Tirfing88 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]prinzklaus 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lofty_quackers 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]tragalicious 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]baskura 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Gerden -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]420dankmemes1337 -5 points-4 points-3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 278 points279 points280 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 114 points115 points116 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bren12310 23 points24 points25 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]PooFlingerMonkey 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 557 points558 points559 points (67 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 206 points207 points208 points (52 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 171 points172 points173 points (51 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheGoldenFruit 124 points125 points126 points (26 children) | Copy Link
[–]popperlicious 27 points28 points29 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]akjoltoy -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]karshberlg 14 points15 points16 points (17 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheGoldenFruit 9 points10 points11 points (16 children) | Copy Link
[–]Val_Hallen 27 points28 points29 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]karshberlg 16 points17 points18 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]OldRuskiNoir 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]karshberlg 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]TheGoldenFruit 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Val_Hallen 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]LowRentMegazord 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]qvrock 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]LowRentMegazord 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NewScooter1234 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]qvrock 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]karshberlg 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]jamsrobots 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]brucetwarzen 7 points8 points9 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]_Wyat 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BuzzfeedPersonified 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]grimreaperx2 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]fucktardskunch 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]trees_are_beautiful 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]How_Do_I_Reddit_xD 22 points23 points24 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]jbaughb 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PwnographyStar 6 points7 points8 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]bolomon7 11 points12 points13 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]PwnographyStar 0 points1 point2 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]bolomon7 4 points5 points6 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Val_Hallen 3 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]bolomon7 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]woosel 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]bolomon7 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]lightslightup 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]photenth 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]These_nutsghady 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AlastarHickey 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Downvotesohoy 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]HarvestProject 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ClinicalOppression 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]jamsrobots 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]0piat3 52 points53 points54 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]Critonurmom 48 points49 points50 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]ixlHD 76 points77 points78 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Eustace_Savage 28 points29 points30 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]justinismyfavorite -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AnonymousFuccboi 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Moderationist 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]TiberiusPapi 95 points96 points97 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]FlameSpartan 49 points50 points51 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]resinis 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mr_jiffy 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Forcistus 1144 points1145 points1146 points (229 children) | Copy Link
[–]bababouie 63 points64 points65 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]Forcistus 72 points73 points74 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]sdp1981 51 points52 points53 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]brucetwarzen 28 points29 points30 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 15 points16 points17 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Pseudonymble 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]RedditLovingSun 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Terminal-Psychosis 12 points13 points14 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]bababouie 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Terminal-Psychosis 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]bababouie 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]cruisinbyonawhim 570 points571 points572 points (180 children) | Copy Link
[–]aboutthednm 260 points261 points262 points (41 children) | Copy Link
[–]Princess_Wannatoke 230 points231 points232 points (30 children) | Copy Link
[–]Reasonable-redditor 110 points111 points112 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]ScenicFrost 57 points58 points59 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Godspeed311 7 points8 points9 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]DarkLorde117 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CaptainDouchington 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Moonwlkr50 10 points11 points12 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]k-NE 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Redox80 -13 points-12 points-11 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Princess_Wannatoke 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]comosedicewaterbed -79 points-78 points-77 points (18 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]brucetwarzen 38 points39 points40 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]HailSlaytan 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Princess_Wannatoke 71 points72 points73 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]GreenSnowday 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]FunkSlice 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]oO0-__-0Oo 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]FlameSpartan 33 points34 points35 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]dslybrowse -2 points-1 points0 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]XanderPrice 3 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]DamonHarp 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]truth_sentinell 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Indoorsman 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]DionysusMA 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Forcistus 160 points161 points162 points (67 children) | Copy Link
[–]imoblivioustothis 38 points39 points40 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]Forcistus 25 points26 points27 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]grnrngr 14 points15 points16 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]dslybrowse 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]grnrngr 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]imoblivioustothis 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]whydog 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Forcistus 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]owenwilsonsdouble 16 points17 points18 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Reasonable-redditor 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]owenwilsonsdouble 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]jamsrobots 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]imoblivioustothis 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Terminal-Psychosis 42 points43 points44 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 24 points25 points26 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]grimreaperx2 4 points5 points6 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Niederweit 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]grimreaperx2 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Forcistus 8 points9 points10 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]dslybrowse 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]cruisinbyonawhim 42 points43 points44 points (20 children) | Copy Link
[–]Forcistus 83 points84 points85 points (15 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (7 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]Reasonable-redditor 7 points8 points9 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]fahque650 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (3 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]fahque650 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]Terminal-Psychosis 21 points22 points23 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Forcistus 7 points8 points9 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]letsgocrazy 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Terminal-Psychosis -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]letsgocrazy 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Terminal-Psychosis -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Forcistus 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (18 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]_Sinnik_ 22 points23 points24 points (17 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (13 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]_Sinnik_ 7 points8 points9 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Forcistus 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]dslybrowse 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Forcistus 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]_Sinnik_ 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Forcistus 0 points1 point2 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]LowRentMegazord 5 points6 points7 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Forcistus -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]LowRentMegazord 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]dslybrowse -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]_Sinnik_ 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DarkSoulsMatter 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]IHaTeD2 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Indigo_Monkey 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DerTrickIstZuAtmen 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]frakistan 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]tothecatmobile 14 points15 points16 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]comosedicewaterbed -9 points-8 points-7 points (18 children) | Copy Link
[–]SoupToPots 28 points29 points30 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]comosedicewaterbed 2 points3 points4 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]SoupToPots 11 points12 points13 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]comosedicewaterbed 8 points9 points10 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]SoupToPots 8 points9 points10 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]comosedicewaterbed 12 points13 points14 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]tofur99 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MunchenOnBundchen 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Goomich 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]SoupToPots 7 points8 points9 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]metatronsaint 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Olli399 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Liftinbroswole 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]_Sinnik_ 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DarkCircle 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DirtieHarry 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]58working 0 points1 point2 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]Shovelbum26 -1 points0 points1 point (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]58working 0 points1 point2 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]Shovelbum26 0 points1 point2 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]58working 0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Shovelbum26 -1 points0 points1 point (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]58working 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Shovelbum26 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]DirtieHarry 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Saendre 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]TheFlamingLemon -6 points-5 points-4 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]_Sinnik_ 6 points7 points8 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Olli399 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Terminal-Psychosis 8 points9 points10 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]TheFlamingLemon -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] -9 points-8 points-7 points (20 children) | Copy Link
[–]Olli399 5 points6 points7 points (18 children) | Copy Link
[–]Secretly-a-cat 6 points7 points8 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Olli399 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] -8 points-7 points-6 points (15 children) | Copy Link
[–]annul 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -4 points-3 points-2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Olli399 4 points5 points6 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]cruisinbyonawhim 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]cfaqzz -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]cruisinbyonawhim 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bensas42 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]apullin 10 points11 points12 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]FoxMcWeezer 8 points9 points10 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]owenwilsonsdouble 5 points6 points7 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]tofur99 9 points10 points11 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]owenwilsonsdouble 5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]tofur99 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]apullin 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]owenwilsonsdouble 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]dantemp 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]No_More_Shines_Billy 32 points33 points34 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]sdp1981 35 points36 points37 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]DirtieHarry 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]x0y0z0 16 points17 points18 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 21 points22 points23 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Forcistus 12 points13 points14 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NiceFormBro 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]CoolingtonBeans 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]somerandomguy02 10 points11 points12 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]JedEckert 42 points43 points44 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[+]somerandomguy02 -6 points-5 points-4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]crazyraisin1982 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Forcistus 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ilubalu 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Niferwee -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Thatweasel 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]dublinclontarf 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Arcon1337 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]resinis 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]sgfocpk[🍰] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]GourmetCoffee 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Elanthius -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Forcistus 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]megablast -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mathewdm423 119 points120 points121 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Pseudonymble 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Surtysurt 283 points284 points285 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]jhaluska 119 points120 points121 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Surtysurt 37 points38 points39 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]kermit_was_right 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SMTTT84 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]fartloud 15 points16 points17 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]THUMB5UP 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]itsalreadybeenthrown 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]lxaex1143 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]jroddie4 178 points179 points180 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]activator 29 points30 points31 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Pseudonymble 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]evesea 50 points51 points52 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Whitlow14 118 points119 points120 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]drylube 17 points18 points19 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Whitlow14 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 27 points28 points29 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Carsinogenic 173 points174 points175 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]InsaneZee 23 points24 points25 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]000OOO000OOO_spooky 20 points21 points22 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]socialadder 18 points19 points20 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mastermark555 51 points52 points53 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]princeapalia 15 points16 points17 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Drezzzire 158 points159 points160 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]These_nutsghady 27 points28 points29 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Goldswitch 12 points13 points14 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Drezzzire 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]lagspike 12 points13 points14 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 36 points37 points38 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Goldswitch 9 points10 points11 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Pseudonymble 12 points13 points14 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]taggadem810 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Pseudonymble 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Damjo 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]throwheezy 46 points47 points48 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 13 points14 points15 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Drezzzire 21 points22 points23 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]joker38 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DarkLorde117 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BigMax 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]touchet29 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]redditbsbsbs 23 points24 points25 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]ratchet41 5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]moyako 8 points9 points10 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]stationhollow 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]HeyitsFerraro 22 points23 points24 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Jmeud 12 points13 points14 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]peanutismint 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]floccinaucin 4 points5 points6 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Shoryuhadoken 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]WDMShredz 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ghostoutfit 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]polini46 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]realstekcor 6 points7 points8 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Shoryuhadoken 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]biggoof 5 points6 points7 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]firetroll 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bren12310 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]QuantumPhoss 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bluetruckapple 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Damjo 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 14 points15 points16 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]thecarolinelinnae 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]xChinky123x 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]chambertlo 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]jondrethegiant 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TrizMichelle 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]firetroll 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Factushima 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]manloveworld 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]thecarolinelinnae 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]JoelMahon 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Grayphobia 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]pussycatmando 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]KaiRaiUnknown 6 points7 points8 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]firetroll 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Raoh522 17 points18 points19 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lokiem 21 points22 points23 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Raoh522 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]UnPawsed 11 points12 points13 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sourcesurfing 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]truth_sentinell 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ShiningConcepts 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TwoPointZero_gpa 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]charizardpoop 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]kbarney345 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]JohnnyHopkins13 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]sh1ftyswar 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mrBatata 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bcrabill 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]orr250mph 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NiMaD83 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MarcusAustralius 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ybeaver7 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]quebec_meth 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]tigertrojan 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]thechosenwonton 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]autourbanbot 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Thinccing 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SickOfIt518 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]hollybegin 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]GearyDigit 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]danielunited -8 points-7 points-6 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]firetroll 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]xChinky123x -14 points-13 points-12 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]ThePonyMafia -11 points-10 points-9 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]SadlyIamJustaHead 5 points6 points7 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThePonyMafia 4 points5 points6 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]SadlyIamJustaHead 0 points1 point2 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]ImOutlawTorn 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]SadlyIamJustaHead -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThePonyMafia 0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]SadlyIamJustaHead 1 point2 points3 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThePonyMafia 1 point2 points3 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]SadlyIamJustaHead 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThePonyMafia 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]SadlyIamJustaHead 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[+]brand-new-day-_- -16 points-15 points-14 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]SadlyIamJustaHead 9 points10 points11 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]brand-new-day-_- 1 point2 points3 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]SadlyIamJustaHead 1 point2 points3 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]brand-new-day-_- 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]SadlyIamJustaHead 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]brand-new-day-_- 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]SadlyIamJustaHead 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SadlyIamJustaHead 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]iamacannibal 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Teller8 -12 points-11 points-10 points (1 child) | Copy Link