TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Bothered watching red pill YouTube

August 16, 2021
162 upvotes

So I have watched a lot of red pill discussions on YouTube. I agree with a lot of it, but it bothers me that with all the talk about men ‘spinning plates’ until they are in their prime, and women having a short ‘shelf life’, NO HOST ever tells guys to be careful of wasting a woman’s time when she is in her prime. If women lose their value in their 30s, all it takes is 1 or 2 failed relationships in their 20s to close the prime marriage window. The tone on these YouTube channels is that the hosts take pleasure in women becoming desperate when they are running out of time to start a family.

The honourable thing for a red pill guy to do is not string along women in their mid-late 20s. A man who is red pill aware should not give the wrong signals to these women unless they are serious about having a relationship.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/RedPillWomen.

/r/RedPillWomen archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Title Bothered watching red pill YouTube
Author Moovmntstudnt
Upvotes 162
Comments 112
Date August 16, 2021 2:50 PM UTC (2 years ago)
Subreddit /r/RedPillWomen
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/RedPillWomen/bothered-watching-red-pill-youtube.982411
https://theredarchive.com/post/982411
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/RedPillWomen/comments/p5hl15/bothered_watching_red_pill_youtube/
Red Pill terms in post
Comments

[–][deleted]  (5 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Moovmntstudnt[S] 3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Who do you recommend ?

[–]anothergoodbook 8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Not who you replied to, but I like Suzanne Venker. She has lots of guests so you can go down a rabbit hole looking into their content.

I started listening to Classically Abby after hearing her on Suzanne’s show :)

[–]nikrage 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Courtney Ryan is a great channel, not sure how red pill she is but she covers a lot of red pill content

[–]esperans 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

As anothergoodbook said, Susan Venker's podcast is very good. On Youtube there's also Mrs. Midwest and the Fascinating Womanhood channel (also read the book). Use the searchbar to find other threads about youtubers, podcasts and books.

[–]CrazyHorseInvincibleModerator[M] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

No moralizing.

[–]Nostalchiq 25 points26 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

I wasted a lot of my best years with a man who was probably gay or asexual and he never told me the entire time, just kept pretending like everything was okay. So this post kinda hits home for me. I listen to a lot of men's RP channels too and I admit they do get me down sometimes. They make me feel completely worthless as a woman, but I want the truth. It would be nice if there was a unisex or women's RP channel out there.

[–]blasphemyflesh 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree. A lot of these channels just seem to enjoy shitting on women and make the assumption that if she’s over 30 and single she was riding the cc in her 20s and don’t consider how many dudes waste women’s time in their 20s aka string her along and pretend they’re interested in commitment. That said poor mans podcast and mediocre tutorials and reviews are pretty level headed.

[–]winstrol 12 points13 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Most RP men are not even looking at the fact that a woman can bear him children which is something western modern society has trivialized, yet it's one of the biggest value a women brings to the table for a high quality RP man. Aside that it wouldn't be ideal to raise a child in this modern era it makes sense that many modern RP men do not value it at this time. Never believe you are worthless! this is non sense! you are more valuable than what you may believe.

[–]Nostalchiq 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You're right, it's definitely overlooked these days. Thank you for the kind words. :) I try to bring other things to the table now that I'm no longer in my prime years, but luckily I married while I was still relatively young.

[–]PT9420 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Try looking up The Crimson Cure. It's an informative women's RP YT Channel.

[–]Nostalchiq 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Thanks!

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Nostalchiq 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, you're right.

[–][deleted] 22 points23 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Most men in this sphere are not looking for marriage, but a type of fulfillment that comes from sexual pleasure. Most people are looking for satisfaction, they don't want relationships.

It's rare that men who market themselves to be high quality actually are, which makes dating a problem. I don't count having money as high value, but having the intelligence and integrity behind it. It's a problem. I've bumped into problem men so much to the point of being a turn off to a woman of character, I just avoid them.

There's a phenomenon I believe is called market demand. Once you have high standards and demand more, and won't settle for less, you will see a change. Why the boom in organic food? Because we demanded it. I don't eat food that isn't good for me, I keep my body fat below 23%. I don't entertain what is not in my long term benefit. People respect me for it. Once you start saying no you will be empowered and those people that are interested in you will reconsider their behavior. Just a thought. ;-)

Just be the best you can be, and let the cards fall where they may.

[–]Intrepid_Place5390 2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

"Most HVM are looking for satisfaction, they don't want LTR". That's probably true (majority).

Why not? It's just like women who are having fun, when they get tired of it, they'll settle down.

guys is the top 20%, especially top 10% can have lots of fun if they want, just like most girls. Why settle down? Don't get me wrong, i'm not a player and I consider myself HV.

But, in my view, the girl I"m dating has to make me want to settle down. And this should work both ways. Each of you should prove/show the other you are a HVM/HVW and you both have RMV also. RMV takes time to show. You don't get relationship qualities in a few dates.

The guys outside of the top 20%, they have to live with the probability that their girl has been with Chad/s. Which is another problem. Women can obtain sex (upward), men usually do not. How has that impacted her? That will be more and more of an issue moving forward and is rarely talked about.

[–]LateralThinker134 Stars 3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Women can obtain sex (upward), men usually do not. How has that impacted her? That will be more and more of an issue moving forward and is rarely talked about.

Rarely talked about? Alpha widowhood comes to mind. It's talked about plenty. So is the "thousand c$$k stare".

[–]Intrepid_Place5390 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

not nearly enough. This generation of women are in for big troubles, and the men they settle for down the road.

[–]LateralThinker134 Stars 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Not just this generation. We're looking at three generations of damage; the flower children of the 60s/70s, their children (Gen X/Y), and millenials. Angry/alone/depressed/single elder women are a hugely growing demographic, and it is at the point of visibly affecting society. It'll get a lot worse before it gets better.

Funny thing is, RPW is a way out of it. An intact, healthy married couple is a power move. If lower class, they don't stay there; they're generally upwardly mobile and much happier than being single. The amount of cope you see in the single older ladies 35-70 these days is... off the charts. Lot of anger and bitterness... and sadly, still too little too late in the self-awareness department. Until that changes...

And until they start teaching the latest generation the old ways, it won't improve. Millenials are starting to show signs they're learning that, as they actually have less sex than prior generations. But I'm afraid that we're going to get societal collapse and sink before the ship rights itself.

[–]WhatIsThisAccountFor4 Star 10 points11 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Ok so, red pill for men begins from a place of rage.

The reason for rage is because men are raised to believe that women cherish kindness and thoughtfulness above money and status from a romantic standpoint. Red Pill is the understanding that this is fundamentally inversed. It makes them feel as though most of the beginning of their lives have been sabotaged from a romantic standpoint. The rage intensifies as they constantly hear from women when they ask “what women want” and women reply “just a nice guy”. The rage intensifies even more as the borderline misogynistic form of interacting with women yields them more success than the kind, gentle form does.

It is sad, but for young men, misogynistic tactics are the most successful. When you realize that tactics that derive from a place of misogyny are most successful you begin to become misogynistic.

This is why most people here say not to go after men who follow the textbook red pill ideology. They don’t want love, and they are selfish. They don’t care if they waste a woman’s youth because simply being kind was never something that the women around them cared about to begin with.

The main mindset of these men is: Why should they be kind to women who don’t care about kindness in their love lives?

After you understand that, you understand everything else regarding red pill. Kindness is useless to their beliefs system.

[–]softrevolution_ 2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Out of real curiosity: is there such a thing as RP women's rage? Is there an equivalent? It often feels like there could be, looking at how women have ruined things for other women. But I'm no expert.

[–]WhatIsThisAccountFor4 Star 2 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

I’m sure some women do experience rage, but the reason women’s rage is lessened is because the “truth” (in our space) is confirming what they’ve always been told. Women are pretty often told that looks are the largest factor in finding love, so there’s not as much to rage against.

For women the “wake up” is realizing that they have been lying to themselves. So if there is rage, it’s internalized rage, it’s not aimed at anything external.

For men the “wake up” is realizing that everyone else has been lying to them. So for them the rage is external, it is aimed at something and someone specific (usually women).

Edit:

if often feels like there could be, looking at how women have ruined things for other women

Sorry I missed this part in my first read over of your reply.

Women don’t tell other women incorrect ways to get and keep men. Women might convince other women that they don’t need men, or that their window to attract men is larger than it is, but I’ve never really spoken to a women who didn’t know that men want her to be hot and fit.

If women do have a rage phase it would be mostly internalized as self hatred because of denial of what they’ve always been told is true.

[–]softrevolution_ 2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Women don’t tell other women incorrect ways to get and keep men.

Women do. There are blue-pilled women out there and they will tell you to indulge yourself and your whims at every turn because this is all "valid", including "sleep with him if you want, it doesn't matter". But it does matter, looks like. I have been ripped to shreds for suggesting that racking up friendships with benefits isn't the best strategy. I'm invalidating women's choices! I can't tell you how sick I am of hearing that.

Ladies, vet your girlfriends as closely as you do the men you want to be involved with. The wrong female guidance can make or break you.

[–]WhatIsThisAccountFor4 Star 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

What you’re describing isn’t the same as what I am describing. You’re describing a lack of importance for perceived negative actions when it comes to attracting love. I’m talking about a lack of importance in perceived positive actions for attracting love.

Men are lied to in the sense of “women will love you if you do X”

Women are lied to in the sense of “men won’t judge you if you do X”.

The things you’re talking about aren’t perceived actions that are supposed to help you acquire love, just perceived actions that aren’t supposed to lose you love. In your situation you’re simply not doing something wrong (according to your female friends). In men’s situation they are actively doing something wrong, but being told it’s right.

In these two situations the difference is that you’re “being lied to” by women when your goal is to attract men. These women aren’t SUPPOSED to know, they’re just speculating. Because they aren’t men.

Men are “being lied to” by women about attracting women. These women ARE SUPPOSED to know what they want. These women either do know are are lying, which induces rage. Or they don’t know they are wrong which also induces rage.

The two options above lead to the respective conclusions of “women won’t tell me the truth about what women want: they shouldn’t be listened to”, or “women don’t know the truth about what women want: they shouldn’t be listened to”.

The conclusion drawn from your perspective is “women don’t know the truth about what men care about: they shouldn’t be listened to”. But they’re not supposed to know in the first place. You should just be asking men.

Men are being actively misguided on what should work by people who should know. Women are being actively misguided on what shouldn’t matter by people who shouldn’t know.

Similar in theory, VERY different in practice.

[–]softrevolution_ 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Okay, that helps! It makes sense now. Thank you so much.

[–]oriorioooo 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I’ve had this happen to me and i just realized it a year later. I lost my v earlier than i should have because i felt pressured to. I blocked her

[–]Pleasant_Cycle_518357 points [recovered] (29 children) | Copy Link

Ah thank you for this post. it is my impression that some men are salty that they don’t get as much attention as women, they perhaps got rejected or something and their anger inspires them to make the future seem hopeless for women. Constantly reminding us that we won’t be worth much soon. Very unhelpful and I don’t think that it is coming from a good place.

[–]ledatherockband 3 points4 points  (28 children) | Copy Link

Some men are salty. From my experience, it’s mostly blue pilled men. I haven’t met an RP man or YouTuber that is salty.

“Spinning plates” is just a practical solution to the reality that women have a higher smv than the vast majority of men and that she can leave at any time.

To quote Richard Cooper, “She’s not yours. It’s just your turn.”

It’s encouraged that men spin plates while they improve themselves, making it less desirable to a woman to leave them in the process, and making it easier to find wife material (if that particular person believes in marriage).

[–]softrevolution_ 19 points20 points  (25 children) | Copy Link

How is it less desirable for a woman to leave while a man is "improving" if he's spinning plates? He's cheating on her and she's, what, twiddling her thumbs?

[–]LateralThinker134 Stars 4 points5 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

He's cheating on her and she's, what, twiddling her thumbs?

You can't cheat if you haven't committed to exclusivity. Most RP men don't do this. The expectation of exclusivity when dating, without it being stated, is a female entitlement that no longer matches with the current cultural norms.

[–]softrevolution_ 2 points3 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

A "female entitlement"? Here I thought it was just the done thing, when you decide you're dating someone you stop fucking other people.

[–]LateralThinker134 Stars 7 points8 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Exclusivity only exists if two people state it is. In today's dating world, assumptions like yours will only get you hurt. You are sexually exclusive only if you commit, verbally and openly, to being sexually exclusive. Otherwise you aren't.

[–]softrevolution_ 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Lord, a lady's got to be paranoid in order to be happy, hasn't she! Well, chalk it up to "haven't dated since 2014", and put exclusivity on the table early.

[–]LateralThinker134 Stars 3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Not paranoid, just assume that the old rules no longer apply, and be open and honest about what you want. Leftists/postmodernists have destroyed or challenged all the old assumptions: that men are men and women are women, that masculinity is desirable in men, that women need men and children need two parents, etc. Now we have to live in the aftermath of that.

You can wallow in the decline, or you can adapt and overcome. What you can't do is to complacently expect the old rules to apply to the new world.

[–]softrevolution_ 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I appreciate all the time you've taken over me, for what it's worth. You didn't owe me anything and I've gotten good advice from you anyhow. "Adapt and overcome" is something I understand better. And all any of us can try is to do better once armed with information. Thank you so much.

[–]LateralThinker134 Stars 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Oh, as an aside, RPW don't fuck lots of people. They tend to recommend not having sex UNTIL you're dating.

when you decide you're dating someone you stop fucking other people.

Did you really mean this? This actually assumes that fucking other people prior to dating is fine. RPW is mostly against pre-relationship casual sex because of a) the deleterious effects on future pairbonding it causes, and b) it lowers the chance of acquiring commitment (old adage about free milk and cows).

I had to add this comment because the more I thought about your statement, the more I realized just how flawed its premise was.

Why would you fuck before dating? Unless you're trying to give everything to men without getting anything in return? How does being easy increase your SMV?

[–]softrevolution_ 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Believe it or not, there are women who will fuck before dating. It's tremendously sad. It's not cute. There are men who will do that, too, but it appears to be the done thing for them.

For the record, my count is two. And they were both men I was serious about. And I quote the adage about cows all the time. Needless to say I don't find myself at home in today's freewheeling feminist circles.

[–]ledatherockband 8 points9 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

If you’re in a committed relationship, be committed. The “spinning plates” concept applies to dating.

I wish I had the study, but about 58% of women already have some other man in mind after a break up.

[–]softrevolution_ 18 points19 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

Wow. Some women THEY are. :( I get upset with women a lot because it feels like many have ruined it for those of us out here who are trying to be decent human beings. Hard to hate the game when the players are making rules that ensure everyone loses.

[–]ledatherockband 16 points17 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

Its nothing to be upset about. It’s just reality that needs to be adjusted to.

It’s honestly easier and probably healthier to improve yourself rather than insist everyone else change.

Personally, I like it. I would consider myself in the top 10% of men between personality, career, income, and attractiveness (not height as I’m only 5’7” how sad lol). I have options.

Really, the ones who lose most are low worth, blue pilled men.

It wasn’t as bad back in the day because there were strong social pressures to discourage both men and women to go from bed to bed.

Social media has made it so women have more options and men must respond by improving their worth on the sexual market place.

Women who haven’t settled down by their mid to late 30s are hurt, too, but they can still get mid value men. Nothing wrong with that. They just shouldn’t expect that the Chads they were sleeping with in their 20s will prefer them over the current day 20 year olds. Further, it is important they don’t confuse being able to secure a hook up with a Chad in their 20s as the same thing as being able to secure marriage with a Chad in their 30s and 40s.

If I have sons, it will be my duty to make sure he grows up to be as high worth as possible.

[–]GmanRaz 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well I will put in my 2 cents here. Yes, there is some saltiness out there, but a lot of men see it as the chickens coming home to roost. A lot of women waste their prime years and it is true and also unfortunate that they do not realize it until it is far too late. It is in a way poetic justice. And unfortunately it is the vast majority.

I can definitely see how this must be frustrating for women who are not this way and are genuinely seeking a life partner and a family etc. But you can't blame the men for assuming women are "temporary pleasures" when the vast majority behave in such a way that they prove they are not worth the time/energy investment. Spinning plates refers to dating only, not committed relationships. Most women never get past the plate phase for two reasons.

1: They show they cannot be trusted and are not a HVW.

  1. One of the biggest hang ups even for high value men though that is showing no signs of changing are the marriage/divorce laws that make the prospect of marriage for any man (high value especially) a terrible deal. It's not that every woman WILL ruin a mans life, it's that legally every woman CAN.

So most red pill men see no value in going that route.

I can only speak from the relationship experiences of my friends, family and myself. Ill use myself as an example. I was married for 9 years. Ex Wife had a lot of red flags I ignored (young and dumb at age 26) and ultimately ended up leaving me for a guy at work.

As a red pill man myself, since my divorce (almost 4 years post) I have started dating again over the last year. "spinning plates" if you will, and every woman has showed within 2-3 months that she isnt worth my time. IE: Messing around with an ex behind my back and lying about it, being an extremist in some form of far left politics, hiding severe mental issues, trying to cheat on a boyfriend or husband WITH me, mask falling off and having extreme masculine energy and behaviors etc...

I have pretty high values and never let anyone cross my boundaries. I am very fit, 6'1 and make decent money, have accomplished quite a bit etc... But I have about the same amount of luck in terms of finding a RP minded woman as some blue pilled simp that lives in his mothers basement does. Dating in this day and age is a shit show for everyone. Good men and good women alike. And we have our society and feminism etc. to thank for that.

[–]Intrepid_Place5390 3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

social media has made it so women have more options: True, for sex

Men must respond by improving their worth: True if they want a good sex life.

Men will have sex with lower SMV women, Women rarely have sex with lower SMV men.

Now, after years of being with Chads, does that impact a women? When she wants to settle down with Joe the plumber who's a great guy, but he is not Chad? Is that going to satisfy her? Yes, it's totally different, she's in love with Joe, the nice guy. But she doesn't lust after him.

That's the future, it's here already.

Women get messed up , having fun with Chad, then can't get a Chad to settle down and have to settle. Are they happy with that?

Guys , many aren't having sex, they can't compete with chads. Do they check out, don't commit? You think Joe doesn't know that his Judy has been having fun with Chad/s. Think he wants to commit to her? Sounds like Joe and Judy have both have to live with things

[–]softrevolution_ 9 points10 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

I'm in my mid-30s and I am actually aiming for mid-value. I don't really want the top 10%, I know I'm not top 10% and it would take a literal miracle for me to be that. But I'm not some bottom-of-the-barrel ex-carousel rider, either, and I'm hoping that mid-value still means shares values with me and I him.

Worth comes in so many flavors. A pity so many people think there's only a few.

[–]ledatherockband 6 points7 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Of course! There is nothing wrong with that.

There are plenty of genuinely great guys that were typically looked over by girls when they were younger because younger people (especially younger women) are pretty bad at making good choices and younger men are too oblivious to learn to become a good choice.

I’m not saying anything bad about younger women in particular. They just have too much choice to the point where the chance of making a good choice becomes hard. It’s like being the first one to class on the first day of school and you don’t know where to sit lol

My brother, I think, is going to end up hitched until his mid 30s. Good looking dude, cool job, good personality, ethical guy, but he lacks the excitement young women are looking for.

[–]Intrepid_Place5390 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

they just have too much choice: Yes, for sex. Not for commitment

[–]throwwie234 4 points5 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I just love how men always try to hide their own hypergamy accusing women of doing that.

Truth is, there's plenty of great women that are totally invisible to you, since they're not "hot". They have zero choices and zero attention and they don't exist to men.

When I was in my early 20s, I'd do ANYTHING for a guy who would showed a trace of interest in me. But there was never one.

I bet your brother could get "hitched" anytime. But why to bother with subhuman women, right? It's better to wait for the "hot ones" to start looking to settle.

[–]LateralThinker134 Stars 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I just love how men always try to hide their own hypergamy accusing women of doing that.

Men aren't hypergamous. A man in a committed relationship that is working won't detonate it to swing to a better option, and they won't keep female orbiters (lol not even a thing) as backup options.

Truth is, there's plenty of great women that are totally invisible to you, since they're not "hot". They have zero choices and zero attention and they don't exist to men.

A man who is just looking for sex with a hot woman won't see an unattractive woman. But do you really want to be seen by him?

But if she's kind, supportive, and feminine, a normal man will see any woman. She has to put herself out there, however, and have a good attitude.

When I was in my early 20s, I'd do ANYTHING for a guy who would showed a trace of interest in me. But there was never one.

Either you weren't available, didn't get out enough, were actively repulsive physically, or actively repulsive socially. Or possibly fishing in too small (or tainted) a pond.

I bet your brother could get "hitched" anytime. But why to bother with subhuman women, right? It's better to wait for the "hot ones" to start looking to settle.

Bitterness and anger aren't attractive or feminine. With that attitude even a modestly attractive woman won't get hit on, let alone LTR'd.

[–]ledatherockband 9 points10 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

An unattractive woman can download Tinder this morning and get laid tonight.

[–]LateralThinker134 Stars 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm not some bottom-of-the-barrel ex-carousel rider, either, and I'm hoping that mid-value still means shares values with me and I him.

Okay, let's say this is true. What makes you mid-value? What do you have to offer a man? Your youth is gone. Your fertility is waning. So... what, exactly? Are you super feminine? A soft landing? A kind, encouraging voice? How are you competing with 20-somethings? How are you limiting your dating selections to quality midrange men who want an LTR when they can score vapid 20-somethings on tinder?

Not attacking, just wondering how much you've looked in the mirror.

[–]softrevolution_ 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm great at handling things that a man just... doesn't want to be bothered with. I have experience in event planning and assisting in event planning, so yeah, that teaches you first mate skills pretty handily. I actually am feminine -- I made one costly hair mistake this winter that I'm kicking myself over because it opens people up to thinking "Is that a them?" I absolutely live for nurturing my mate; when I was in a relationship oh so many years ago, I loved welcoming him home with a hot bath and a shave and a cup of tea just the way he liked it. I wish it had worked out, but there was a good reason it did not. I love it when the people around me find encouragement.

I am not going to look down on a nice 40-something with older kids. I personally don't want to bear children, so a man who wanted that would not share my values. But I honestly wouldn't object to helping finish raise them. I joke that I'm a born auntie/stepmother. I love meeting and getting to know the important people in a man's life, and I want them to like me because they're important to him. I don't want to be the stereotypical pissed-off daughter-in-law. I want a happy cosy family.

And I understand the difference between fantasy men and real men in appearances. Yeah, he's not going to look like insert-film-star-here. So what? So what if he's like 5'4"? I'm tiny, that's still tall enough! I have yet to meet the vapid 20-something who cared to dig deeper when his appearance wasn't quite right. I'm not saying I'm OK with the kind of neckbeards I used to run into when I hung in gaming circles, but OTOH I take care of myself, and expect whoever I'm with to do the same.

[–]Jihocech_Honza 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

cheating

You can not spin plates in a long term relationship.

Rollo Tomassi

[–]Intrepid_Place5390 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

reality that women have a higher smv than vast majority of men.

Not really. Most men will have sex with women of lower SMV. Women generally do not have sex with lower SMV men.

So, women can have Sex much easier, but can't have relationships easier with HVM.

Many men are angry with that reality. Especially men who end up with women who have been with Chad/s. I don't think many women would be happy if they knew their guy was with women much above them. They normally don't have to concern themselves with that.

For men, they have to live with reality, not fantasy.

Yes, RP, is about improving yourself, and it's peripheral effect is to attract higher quality women. But, women are not really it's objective. That is the original RP, but today is about pickup artist and is being corrupted.

[–]LateralThinker134 Stars 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

So, women can have Sex much easier, but can't have relationships easier with HVM.

Women are the gatekeepers of sex.

Men are the gatekeepers of relationships.

RP basic truth.

[–]GreatMenderTeapill 10 points11 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

RPM here. You aren't wrong. It is a product of the fact that a lot of the OG red pill males were also the pick-up artist guys. They made a shitload of money telling insecure young guys this stuff.

Before I knew about red pill I was pretty alpha but I was young, dumb, and poor. I got laid a lot and "spun plates" before I even knew that was a thing. Now I'm in my late 30's (prime?), I own my own business and I have achieved a somewhat prototypical ideal situation for a RPM. My interest level in fucking a bunch of random clams now that I have "arrived": zero.

Dont forget that red pill is a fairly new set of ideas. It is evolving. I can tell you one thing that it’s founders did not foresee: Red Pill Women.

Hope this helps.

[–]LateralThinker134 Stars 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I can tell you one thing that it’s founders did not foresee: Red Pill Women.

I think they originally considered RPW in one of two ways: either as traditional conservative women (in some respects) or as unicorns. What hasn't been a thing until recently is actually researching, codifying, and exploring explicitly, on a growing sociocultural level, what works for women in the relationship arena.

Traditional conservatism - the happy housewife - knew a lot of RP truths instinctively, learning them from mom and society. However, while they were understood they weren't explicitly taught or comprehended. Hypergamy wasn't a known concept, just the behavior was. The CC wasn't around. Social Media didn't exist. We've learned a lot about the excesses that women are capable of under the guise of 'sexual liberation'.

Turns out, letting encouraging women to act out all of their base instincts is self-destructive to their short- and long-term happiness. Who could have predicted that?

And yet, some women did know. Secrets of Fascinating Womanhood was first published in 1989. And it's pure, amazingly accurate RPW advice, so much so that it's a reference text. But it doesn't support feminism so it's ignored. Sigh.

[–]Advanced_Bar_673 29 points30 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Also remember that most of the RP men on YouTube are coaches/ authors who have monetized the "lifestyle", and stand to gain a lot of money and fame from the outrage men experience when "taking the pill." It becomes a feedback loop of profit to upset men and then sell them the solution. And of course the mob mentality with online anonymity encourages it too. Try to glean what you can from it without taking it personally, remembering the context with possible ulterior motives.

[–]keevajuice 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

This is really well said

[–]LivingfreewithSophie 17 points18 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Sometimes I watch RP men videos, just to get an insight or to remind myself not to fall for men playing games. But you need to watch stuff aimed at women, so you can learn from someone who has women's best interest at heart :)

I really like Greta Bereisaite on youtube! She really explains how men think and how women can best deal with it. She really focuses on mentality and emotional control.

I also enjoy Adrienne Everheart as she focuses on feminine energy. If you combine those two you are way better of 😊

[–]LightOverWater 17 points18 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Men aren't forcing women into STRs though. These guys can spin plates with women who choose to be in STRs, FWB, ONS, flings etc. That's not the guy's fault when women choose to lead a life of wild party years.

A guy is faulted if he's straight up lying to her in a monogamous relationship. This also applies to women.

If women lose their value in their 30s, all it takes is 1 or 2 failed relationships in their 20s to close the prime marriage window.

A long-term monogamous relationship in your 20s isn't spinning plates though, so this is where I see your point breaking down.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Men should, at all times, react to the consent of a woman. When a woman is consenting to a man the risk she takes doing so is hers, and that sometimes comes at a price, particularly the cost of time. That's life. Her "picker" is hers to develop and use, and who she is attracted to is her business. Will she interact with men that she's attracted to that don't commit to her, sure, that's normal. Women desire men with options, because he's earned his options and indicates his value clearly having done that work. Of all the men out there who have earned their options, a small subset will commit to a woman for life, which lets be honest that's what most women are interested in, fingers crossed that comes packaged in an experience that can be described as "love". The 'tone' on lots of red-pill rage / comment is born of frustration and having been manipulated by women, where often a man believes he's chasing "love" only to discover the woman he's attracted to does not share that goal with him, or of course she replaces him for another one of her many options. Consent, it's like gold. If she gives it he can have her, and what comes next is always uncertain for her and OF COURSE for him, hell why would he think she's going to commit to him even if all she brings is her appearance and little else. There will always be a guy interested in her, she knows it, and Mr. earned his options knows it.

[–]dadudenines 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

When women are competing in the hamster Olympics (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHji4P2B5sM) it is a better use of time to take on the nihilistic, hedonistic aspects of red pill rather then attempt to counteract them with uh, constructive principles (https://dalrock.wordpress.com/, https://www.rooshv.com/can-single-people-become-mature).

Red Pill or Blue Pill, a guy can be taken to the cleaners because the hamster ain't happy. There are no consequences. Men are just reacting and taking Red Pill (aka reality) and using it for other purposes, now much to women's disadvantage. Men have adapted and now women have to figure out what to do next...

https://www.elle.com/life-love/sex-relationships/advice/a10010/failure-to-launch-when-beauty-fades-323090/

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/03/marry-him/306651/

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2011/11/all-the-single-ladies/308654/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/11/19/calif-court-rules-against-divorced-cancer-survivor-in-dispute-over-frozen-embryos-even-though-she-may-be-infertile/

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/men-rarely-catcall-me-any-more-i-hate-that-our-culture-makes-me-miss-it_n_55ad4bffe4b0d2ded39fac74

Those are old articles, however those issues are so common now the Red Pill is essentially monetizing it...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VI6XWGKvUrE.

It is shocking, bothering, concerning, terrible, because it is way to true. It strikes at the core of the individual who is ego invested in the pretty little lies https://notesfromaredpillgirl.com/2018/08/22/pretty-little-lies/

[–]WhisperTRP Founder 45 points46 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

NO HOST ever tells guys to be careful of wasting a woman’s time

...

The honourable thing for a red pill guy to do

...

A man who is red pill aware should not

This is skirting the "no moralizing" rule, but let's answer it, because we can deal with some important misconceptions.

The reason TRP exists is because men got tired of looking out for women who were only looking out for themselves.

Obviously, in any kind of functional relationship, both partners must look out for each others' needs, or else the relationship doesn't work. But this isn't a "gimme" that can just be assumed, certainly not today and possibly not ever.

Men are human beings. They are entitled, just like any human being, to prioritize their interests, and exist for their own goals rather than other people's. What this means is that you don't get to demand protectiveness from men just because you have a vagina. You have to earn that protectiveness with your behaviour towards him.

The men of TRP, and men in general, are not obligated to take care of you, any more than you were obligated to consider their feelings before you wrote this demanding and demeaning post about what you thought they "should" do.

You do not become a "red pill woman" who is entitled to men's time, effort, love, and care simply by declaring yourself so, and reading this group. If you want something from them, you have to actually act in a way that inspires it... which starts with not acting entitled.

If you want a man to willingly consider your needs, RPW is here to teach you how to inspire that. If you think you should not have to, then you would probably more comfortable somewhere else.

[–]Moovmntstudnt[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Hi, I will look into the “no moralizing” rules closer to make sure I phrase my posts better in the future.

[–]All_Lurk_No_Post36514 points [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

Wonderfully put, why should rp men give a shit when no one cares about their time, money and efforts being wasted???

[–]Moovmntstudnt[S] 4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I will add to my thoughts and say that I also encourage women not to waste a man’s time, money, and effort. This is equally important.

[–]Intrepid_Place5390 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

exactly, Branch swinging is that definition.

[–]ryder004 23 points24 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's because there's no benefit to men getting married now a days. Once you get the government involved in your relationship, the system is 100% stacked against men.

These RP Youtbers tell men to stay clear of marriage because there's more than enough horror stories of men having their life ruined in the process. These RP channels aren't just for dating but rather an overall mens self improvement guide.

I personally just tuned 30, and 6-7 years ago did have marriage in mind. Now? Not a chance. Not just from RP content/internet stories, but over the years actually seeing this for myself in real life of men getting fucked up by divorce/child courts. The risk is not worth the reward. I want no part of that, so spinning plates and focusing my life around my goals is far more rewarding for me. Sure there's women out there like the ones in this sub, but for every 1 of you there are 5-10 modern women/boss babes/alpha females types who are only good for being a plate and nothing more.

If I had to chime in my 2 cents to the women on this sub who want to get married: go for a blue pilled guy. There's levels to how blue pilled a guy is and they're not all equally blue pilled. Get one on the lower end of the spectrum, which you will be able to vet out just using your feminine instincts after a month or two of getting to know each other. These types men have a much higher chance of committing to you and giving you the ring. I know getting a high value man who's alpha is the goal but realistically these men have too many options and they get women left and right with no strings attached. There might be some of these men out there who want a LTR/marriage but you're really looking for a needle in the haystack going for that.

Edit: Forgot to add, OP: if you’re scared of men wasting your prime years through failed relationships, be more straightforward of what you want. I noticed some women aren’t comfortable doing this because they think it’ll spook/chase away the man. That does happen sometimes but it’s a lower risk rather than dating for months/years hoping the man steps up to the plate and permanently locks you down. And yes, unfortunately there are women who make it very clear to the man they’re dating of what they want and they still get strung along for years. The current dating market for LTR/marriage is tough as it’s mainly geared for casual more than anything. Having said that, I’d still be very vocal and clear if I was in your position. Just be smooth about it as in start off light and over time make it a bigger emphasis. Hope that helps.

[–]JustaTcup 5 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

No - it's up to ME to watch my own back. I can't expect random men to be variously "protecting" me. This sounds like you think we are little girls who have to be taken care of. Only when we settle with a man should we expect him to take care of us. Until then - we have to take care of OURSELVES.

[–]Moovmntstudnt[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Good for you!

Others have mentioned that it’s a women’s responsibility to do proper vetting with partners. Is this what you mean by “taking care of yourself” ?

[–]Ionotropic_effect 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I didn’t write the comment above, but I agree with it. Proper vetting, yes, but not giving any man except my husband the responsibility of taking care of me. I had no expectations of random men “protecting me”.

FWIW I was never a feminist but I did go to college and worked full time prior to meeting my husband in order to support myself...I was kind of take-it-or-leave-it with kids too (genetic issues in my family) so I never felt intense pressure to marry and have children young. I married at 30 and had our only child at 32. Still working part time in a career I enjoy and got a certification to teach fitness classes.

[–]anothergoodbook 35 points36 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

I’d say that’s why all the more we women have to be carefully vetting. Don’t have sex. Seriously. Until there either a ring or a serious commitment (I say wait for marriage but whatever).

And don’t have 3 year long relationships. Have 6 month relationships until you’ve found one worth marrying. Watch out for yourself don’t expect a guy to watch out for you. If he’s worth your time he’ll be content to wait to have sex.

[–]LightOverWater 22 points23 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

At what point in witholding sex will you start to lose good men? Very few men will wait around forever, especially the ones with value/options because they might feel strung along, too. It's a two-way straight.

If your strategy is to not have sex until you're married I'm afraid you'll cut out nearly all your options in today's environment. Outside of religion, I've never heard of this happening.

The other point of view from the guy's perspective is, if the girl has already slept around but suddenly she's withholding sex from you because she wants marriage, how do you think that makes him feel being treated differently?

[–]anothergoodbook 9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I have a husband and we waited until we were married.

I didn’t say you had to absolutely wait until marriage. There’s the difference between waiting 3 months for exclusivity and the first date (sometimes not even the first date now!). But I sure as heck think if you play into these guys’ plans that doesn’t work either.

Men hold the keys to commitment while women hold the keys to sex.

Hopefully he’s see the value that she’s putting on herself now by not just putting out because he wants sex.

[–]gotgame740 3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

you'll never lose a **marriage-minded** man by making him wait for sex with you IF he is planning to marry you. Of course, this assumes that you are bringing enough other things to the table, like showing him you can cook, clean, take care of the house, being nurturing, and just generally showing him that you will make a good mother.

The problem is that most women today DON'T bring much to the table outside of sex, so without it, they can't keep a man. If you follow the best advice on this sub you shouldn't have any problems with this

[–]gotgame740 5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

But this does assume that you're either a virgin or have a very low n-count (less than 3). If every other guy has gotten the goods for free, then yeah holding out ain't gonna work for you lol. No such thing as a born-again virgin haha

[–]LateralThinker134 Stars 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

If every other guy has gotten the goods for free, then yeah holding out ain't gonna work for you lol.

Oh, you read WhereAreAllTheGoodMen subreddit too?

[–]Moovmntstudnt[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You’re so right about the long relationships. I happen to be married and am not having this problem, but I feel for the other women out there !!

[–]Moovmntstudnt[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You’re so right about the long relationships. I happen to be married and am not having this problem, but I feel for the other women out there !!

[–]Itmfl2000 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I think women need to reflect on themselves. Don't waste a man's time or resources. If you've got self esteem issues see a therapist don't lead a guy on. If you think getting attention from a man to make another women feel like shit but have no interest in him, please see a therapist. If you keep your options open for too long it's not going to turn out well. There is already a cultural shift happening, where some men won't even look at women who are over 30, because if you were that fabulous you'd be taken already. Men's resources and time are getting spent and it's being used within their close circle of male friends.

[–][deleted] 17 points18 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I can understand that you find 'male RedPill' shocking and that the view of how women are painted in there is not always pretty, but that's far from what the community is about and trust me, there's valid reasons for it to be the way it is.

It's true that male and female Red Pill are completely different and have different goals, but I believe that both RedPillWomen has utility for men and male RedPill has utility for women.

A big one is that male RedPill has a lot of information for men on how to avoid getting divorce raped by a spouse and how to avoid false rape accusations. Both of these are prime reasons on why men nowadays are terrified of getting married, so combating these issues is important for you too.

Of course, male RedPill also advises men to become high value men - there's comprehensive guides on grooming, dressing, becoming mentally sound and becoming more assertive. Male RedPill is also about completely embracing one's masculinity, so becoming self-sufficient and becoming strong (lifting weights) are recurring pieces of advice on there.

The spinning plates part is against the female interest, that is true, but what's also true is that men nowadays often reach adulthood while having a completely warped view of what women are and how to communicate with women. As sad as it is, spinning plates has kind of taken on a utility of forcing many men to actually dedicate a sizeable amount of time in talking to women, meeting women and spending time with women without feeling like they're being used for validation or "strung along", as this just creates resentment. Not all men need to do this, I didn't, but some do.

RedPillWomen is also primarily about self-improvement and not only about securing a high value male, but also keeping them, and this is the part about RPW which I like the most. Female advice on reddit often paints things in a way which implies that once you've "secured a good man" you've basically done it and you can just bask in the value he provides. RPW sees that this is bound to create resentment at some point and addresses this often. "Captain / First Mate" isn't there for nothing. Women have enormous power when it comes to further developing their husband and enabling him to reach the skies, so RPW sees this power in how a woman can grow by helping her man grow. Note, helping, not becoming a nagging bitch.

tl;dr Both communities are beneficial for the opposite gender to a great degree and while they're different they do complement one another, sometimes in counter-intuitive ways.

[–]garbagecompressor 4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Great response, thank you.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

My pleasure!

[–]Moovmntstudnt[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Thanks for the thoughtful reply

[–][deleted]  (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]CrazyHorseInvincibleModerator[M] -2 points-1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

No moralizing.

[–]ModernPolygamy 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Sorry, I meant no offense. Poor choice of wording and rule oversight. I should have phrased it the way the OP did as honorable, respectful, or treating others the way you want to be treated.

[–]gammaJinx 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Redpill is about excepting hard truths right? So let me be honest getting commitment out of a man is as hard as getting sex out of a woman. Especially top tier men with options. If you want these men you have to provide enough value to their lives that they can’t operate without you. That’s the reality. Guy game is getting as much sex as possible. Girl game is being able to retain high value men after sex and also withholding sex won’t really work on men who have options they will just assume you are not interested and move on to the next.

[–]judgemycomposure 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That's because RPM are in it out of bitterness. RPW are in it due to interest in a certain homelife.

Best to remain a RPW, but seek out a man who has never been interested in RP discourse. He's just a decent, good man naturally.

[–]All_Lurk_No_Post3656 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

To be fair plenty of women have no shame in wasting a man's time, money and effort so why should they care?

[–]Moovmntstudnt[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I also don’t think women should waste a man’s time, effort, and money

[–]ThenIJizzedInMyPants 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Redpill from the male perspective is NOT always compatible with redpill from the female perspective.

Remember that male redpill is about optimal sexual strategy - so things like spinning plates may be good for a guy to get more experience, but they are not great for a girl looking to have one partner for life.

[–]r2401 7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

It is a big hypocrisy in the red pill. They participate in the very culture they correctly identify as bad for society.

[–]eddboat112 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Men merely adapted to the dating culture that women created, if modern women didn't give it up so easy and were more marraige minded, there wouldn't be many "plates" to spin, thus making men more likely to commit.

[–]abacabbmk[🍰] 8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The honourable thing for a red pill guy to do is not string along women in their mid-late 20s.

The honourable thing for any guy or girl to do is not string along anyone regardless of age. But clearly thats not how the dating world works today. So the advice given is how to best navigate the realities of dating while doing what is best for yourself, rather than talk about things 'should' be in the world.

Also if someone doesn't want to be strung along then they need to have "that" conversation with their partner after a bit of time.

[–]biitchstix4 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Yea I've always really disliked the hookup/casual/player/PUA (i don't really know what the exact term i'm looking for is but just all that nonsense lol) side of the redpill convo. I feel like the focus should be building healthy relationships with like-minded women, not spitefully engaging in meaningless sex. They criticize women who waste their 20's hoeing around and stacking bodies up while they do the exact same gross thing they're criticizing? idk.

[–]eddboat112 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Copied from another reply:

Men merely adapted to the dating culture that women created. If modern women didn't give it up so easy and were more marraige minded, there wouldn't be many "plates" to spin, thus making men more likely to commit.

[–]LateralThinker134 Stars 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

it bothers me that with all the talk about men ‘spinning plates’ until they are in their prime

You aren't the intended audience. Young men not in their prime who want to get laid are.

The honourable thing for a red pill guy to do is not string along women in their mid-late 20s.

The honourable thing for a "lady" to do is to not play mind games, slut around, or be an insufferably selfish egomaniac in her 20s either, but many (most?) do just that these days.

NO HOST ever tells guys to be careful of wasting a woman’s time when she is in her prime.

This is because women are adults capable of making their own decisions just like men. A man who encounters a woman who makes good choices may LTR her; plates get made from women who make bad choices.

The important thing you're omitting is that these RP men aren't forcing women to do anything. A RP man who is only looking to spin plates won't date a woman who doesn't easily put out - something that RPW would weed out. A RPW who ran into one of these players is safe unless she's dumb enough to break from RPW advice and give it up early. If she does, her wasted time is her own fault.

Finally, note that men aren't told to lie on RP channels. Women do that to themselves. RP shows teach deflection, sure, and how to pass shit tests. A RPW is unlikely to waste years on a man because you learn red flags and vetting early on. It's the rare male psychopath who can evade those for years. Most of the time, women saw them and let them slide.

[–]justtenofusinhere 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Why should it be on men to have this concern? Why should a man elevate a woman's (not his wife's) concerns over his own?

Many men would counter women, as a whole, aren't acting on concern for men. Is some woman bleeding him dry financially? Sucks to be him.

There's also the issue of sexual responsibility. If a man wants to have women, he must develop the right skill set, or he'll be out on his backside. The same is for women. It is up to men to become high value, it is up to women to properly vet men. If she cannot, or will not, properly vet a man, it's her failing not his.

[–]Flharfh1 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

"The honourable thing for a red pill guy to do is not string along women in their mid-late 20s. A man who is red pill aware should not give the wrong signals to these women unless they are serious about having a relationship."

If she wants marriage within a certain time frame and she's unsure if he wants the same, it's the woman's responsibility to have a difficult conversation with the man regarding the future of their relationship, and then if the man declines to commit in the way she wants, to end it.

You consent to being "strung along" by staying in the relationship.

[–]Solarsystemm 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

“Men are success objects, while women are beauty objects”

I don’t get what is wrong tho. If both of them agree about the casual dating, no one is to blame, i know most of men will lie his way into your panties, but as a woman that wants a serious relationship, just secure the relationship before the bedroom, it’s that simple.

[–]Scoobyginger25 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I wholeheartedly agree

[–]Known-Cake5480 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

A man’s attractiveness comes at the expense of women’s time (preselection). Being “honorable” for men is the losing move. All is fair in love and war.

[–]RPsplainer 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

First of all, anyone can make a youtube channel and call themselves red pill doesn't mean that they are.

Second, no guy, red pilled or not, needs you telling them what is "honorable."

Don't hate the players, hate the game.

[–]biped_thing 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

(male) Redpill is not about love or marriage

[–]LateralThinker134 Stars 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

TRP is about understanding women's actual nature, not what society wants us to believe. It is about truth, not BP lies. It means you understand what hypergamy and shit testing and AFBB are.

What you DO with that information is NOT part of RP. Some quit the game (MGTOW), some use it to get laid (PUA), and some use it to form lasting, healthy relationships (MRP/RPW). Incidentally, MRP is small/mostly ignored because it is so dangerous to men to get married these days, but... it does exist.

[–]winstrol 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

As a male i agree!!

[–]NicoleInBlue 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

It bothers you not because they advertise stringing women along but because they bring to your awareness your time/beauty/fertility limitations.

[–]Moovmntstudnt[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Not true, I acknowledge the reality of that

[–]purple_pansy88 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Have you seen most of the men in the 'red pill'? A YouTuber called the CBP channel has done a few exposès on them.

Most of them are single, lonely middle aged men who live alone and have a lot of personal pain and grievances toward women. Most of them are not exactly living the life they claim to live. I would honestly recommend you look up The CBP channel on YouTube He's made a number of documentaries on the manosphere. This man himself isn't a feminist and he's been involved in the community himself.

I definitely would stop consuming this type of media right now.

[–]ChipMendelson 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

These redpill self-described pickup artist losers on YouTube are not real men, they’re boys.

I have never read something that more succinctly encapsulates what it means to be a man than this: https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/46473/if---

Does that sound anything like these YouTube guys? No.

Life is not a game. Relationships are not games. Whether that’s friendly relationships with other men or dating relationships with women. I legitimately can’t understand why any self respecting, intelligent adult would want to fuck around with one of these morons.

[–]themanasdaskid 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

So I’ve only heard the other side from Steffan Molyneux, I remember him saying if you don’t want anything with her and you’re with her, than you’re wasting her time.

[–]Maleficent-Brief-178 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

If your goal is to find a man who's absolutely emotionally physically and financially committed to marry build a partnership with and have children a man cannot string you along or divert you from this purpose what the red pill forms constantly belittle and make fun of women for is spending their twenties focusing on alternative goals and then in there their 30s hoping to spontaneously arrive at this result

I do not agree with most red pill ideology! I will agree that what these forums are encouraging in young men (or any men) to do is not to commit to non-committal women

Personally in my own experience I have found divorced men to be the partners that are most able to hold up and honor The sexual arrangements I seek out ones based off equality stability and safety

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2023. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter