TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Men "settle"

April 10, 2017
24 upvotes

It's often said that men would choose a 6-7 who is sweet and thinks the world of him instead of a 8-9 who is entitled and bitchy. According to this theory, doesn't this mean men also "settle" for the "beta-type" woman who adores him, when he would actually prefer the 8-9 because they're more attractive?

Any thoughts?

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/RedPillWomen.

/r/RedPillWomen archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Title Men "settle"
Author vanBeethovenLudwig
Upvotes 24
Comments 94
Date April 10, 2017 9:16 AM UTC (6 years ago)
Subreddit /r/RedPillWomen
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/RedPillWomen/men-settle.87159
https://theredarchive.com/post/87159
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/RedPillWomen/comments/64ijgi/men_settle/
Red Pill terms in post
Comments

[–]TankVet37 points38 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Attraction isn't limited to physical appearance. One of the "hottest" women I know is actually an awful human being who I seek to avoid completely. While she has physically attractive assets, her personality is terrible and her character repugnant. The latter two factor heavily into long term attraction and, perhaps more significantly in this discussion, my happiness with a relationship.

I'm happier and healthier and better off if I pick a better woman for me than if I pick the hottest woman I know. So in that sense I'm not settling.

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

this. finding a girl who is a 10 and isn't a terrible human is ultra rare because they get spoiled as fuck by men who move mountains for them just to be allowed to orbit ("creepy guy held the door for me! eww get away!"). and then on top of that, 10s tend to be terrible at sex because they've never had to be good to attract or keep guys around. overall, you can tolerate them every now and then for some sex, but there's no long term potential.

8s tend to be the best mix of attractive and not-bitchy. it's all in the hot crazy matrix.

[–]Landry868 points9 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

This is so true... it's gotten to the point where I just don't even find people attractive based on face-value anymore. I know so many Barbie-doll looking women who are terrible wives and mothers...after getting to know them, they just aren't even attractive anymore. And I've lost respect for their husbands for marrying such vile human beings. If you want a "trophy wife" who is a wicked witch, at LEAST sterilize yourself... they don't make good moms!

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I felt this way in the dating world, right before I met my fiancé. My requirement for appearance had become "Can I be attracted to this person?", which is a far cry from the more typical "Am I attracted to this person?"

[–]testmypatience6 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Unrelated... By TankVet, do you mean you drove tanks?

[–]TankVet0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Sadly, no.

[–][deleted] 15 points16 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I don't think "settling" is necessarily a bad thing. A couple of years ago I read the book Marry Him: The Case for Settling for Mr. Good Enough, which talked about all of the silly parameters people (with emphasis on women) set for loving someone.

Even here, on a subreddit about seeing the reality of our situation, I see women talk about how he has to be x feet tall, even defending that stipulation by arguing with the fact that less than 15% of the population is above 6 feet. I see men do the same. They want a woman with a heart of gold, the body of Miss America, and the sexual attitude of a porn star. Each sex argues their point by claiming the other does it too, and everyone misses the real point that this is why they can't find a mate of value.

So, yes, I think we all settle. I would love for my fiance to be six feet taller and have a full head of hair, but once I realized I had to trade those things that don't matter for the things that do, I was much happier. I'm sure he'd love it if I were thinner and didn't have stretch marks, but he couldn't have it all either. We need to take the stigma out of settling. It's just facing reality.

[–]vanilleexquise5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This is deep.

[–]famously13 points14 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

You could look at it this way. Or you could see them as looking at more than one dimension of an entire person (looks being one, personality the other) and then finding the max, cumulative value. It's a little like D&D. Of course, the number and types of dimensions are for each of us to choose.

[–]testmypatience4 points5 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

This is EXACTLY how it works for someone that knows the game of life well. In business it is called Weighted Scorecards and is a form of a Weighted Sum Model. Some people do a simple version with the Pro's Con's columns evaluation method.

[–]famously0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

I learned the Pros Cons model as "The Franklin Method."

[–]testmypatience0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Thank you

[–]famously1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Wow. That's the nicest thing anyone has ever written to me on Reddit.

[–]testmypatience0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I can't seem to find that method online anywhere as a pro con method. I am pretty sure someone told me it was called that before, but I can't seem to find it online anywhere.

[–]famously0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

A full description, with credits, is probably stacked right next to the guide on churning butter and how to maintain your buckboard.

[–]testmypatience0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

.

[–]SexistFlyingPig12 points13 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

If your only value is sex/being hot, then you're a rapidly depreciating commodity. A 6-7 with a good personality will be someone who will support you when you're down. That's worth more than 1 year of hot sex and a lifetime of hell.

[–]cynicalhousewife points points [recovered] | Copy Link

I don't know where people in the red pill get this idea that there are loads of 8s, 9s and 10s walking around. Really, how many women are supermodels? I suppose in an area where people are very wealthy, and women have money to have procedures done ect but in most regular communities you are not going to find that many stunningly beautiful people. To answer your question, I think men have different standards. I think conventional attractiveness obviously matters a lot to some men, to the point where they won't compromise on it. Others are at the opposite end of the spectrum. They have way lower standards of what passes the boner test. Men also have varying tolerance levels when it comes to women's behavior. If they didn't my 300lb bad tempered, highly strung sister would not have a doting husband who sleeps on the couch. Still, I don't think that's a reason for people to treat others badly, but I see plenty of women get away with it.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

I agree and find both genders are guilty of this. Personally, I know I'm a 7 in marriage material and I don't care what I score in one-night-stand material. I bring the baggage of divorce, but without children. I'm feminine and have a good career that I enjoy and can make my own living. I'm pretty, but statistically overweight, though I wouldn't call myself fat. We're all delusional if we think a 9 is going to show up and want us.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (8 children) | Copy Link

What I'm wondering is if your overweight then why don't you fix that? To me it just doesn't make sense to be overweight when it's such an easy problem to fix. Honest question and I mean no insult ... I'm just curious because i see more and more heavy girls these days.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy Link

I said I'm statistically overweight. I'm probably about 10 pounds above a healthy BMI and yeah, I try to lose weight, but I don't have much problem with my body and my health is in no danger due to those 10 pounds. My doctors are all happy with my weight. I work out four or five times a week, eat well, and comfortably wear a size 8. Considering I lost 90 pounds five years ago and have kept it off, I'm not apologizing for 10 more.

I actually do agree that it's strange to see the number of heavy women, today. I just wouldn't call myself heavy. My cousin posts pictures of her sorority sisters online and these 19-year-old girls are all a size 16/18 minimum and I don't understand why they don't make healthy choices, while they're young and can avoid damaging their bodies.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

Fair enough and thanks for the reply, I guess this question is really more directed at others who are a great deal heavier than what would be considered healthy

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

I'm sorry if I sounded defensive. I did edit to sound less so, because after losing nearly 100 pounds, I can get very frustrated with myself over those last 10. I do think men have a much easier time with losing weight than women. I definitely know what you're talking about in seeing very heavy young women. It seems much more common today, alongside the "body positive" Tess Holliday types.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

I believe it's tougher for a man to obtain a desirable body than it is for a woman. If a guy just eats less and obtains ideal weight he's just considered skinny and this isn't really an attractive trait (though not unattractive in most cases). In addition to this a guy usually needs to put on muscle (especially if said guy is shorter than average height) which requires good diet and lots of work in the gym. I see so many women with cute faces who I feel could have their pick of men in todays social climate just by eating less until they're at a good weight. Skinny women = much more attractive (generally speaking and disregarding the anorexic look of course). However skinny man does not generally = being attractive. Additional work is required for a man to have a good body. Hell even somewhat overweight women are considered attractive if the weight happens to be in the right spots (think curvy women).

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

I believe it's tougher for a man to obtain a desirable body than it is for a woman. If a guy just eats less and obtains ideal weight he's just considered skinny and this isn't really an attractive trait (though not unattractive in most cases).

Yes. but getting to skinny is easier, which is what most men want in a woman (as you've stated). If a man is naturally broad or stocky, it's often enough. I live in an area where many men do manual labor, so those traits sort of just... happen, with little to no effort. If he does gain weight, he'll likely carry it better. Women often have jobs that require less physical exertion, so the only way to lose weight is diet and more deliberate exercise.

To be clear, I was only claiming it's easier for a man to lose weight. It's often less important to women if he has a bit of a belly.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Good points. I think for men losing weight is slightly easier than it is for women as men have more muscle tissue and burn more calories naturally. However anyone who eats a caloric deficit can shed unwanted pounds. That's just how the body works. I think it's a question of willpower.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

It is. I just think it takes more time for women and often has to be a greater deficit, especially as we get older. My husband gets about 18,000 steps a day at work. On a good day, I get 3,000 steps. I go home and work out for about an hour, maybe an hour and a half, while he plays on the computer and has a drink. We both eat healthy meals, but in the three weeks since our honeymoon, I've lost 5 pounds to his 12. I kind of want to throttle him. Lol.

[–]WeCaredALot5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't know where people in the red pill get this idea that there are loads of 8s, 9s and 10s walking around. Really, how many women are supermodels?

Exactly, but I've realized that people online tend to have different scales for 'regular folk' than for celebrities, models, etc. I live in Los Angeles where there are TONS of beautiful women, and it's still relatively rare to see women in the 8-10 range unless you're at the beach, in a young/hip area on the weekend, or at a casting call. I feel like women in this range would really stand out for being above the pack. It shouldn't be common to see them, and if it is, they probably aren't 8s, 9s, or 10s.

[–]En-Zu4 points5 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Most men have lower standards than you might think. A lot of guys get pretty fuzzy around 7+.

[–]ragnarockette4 Stars4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I mean the whole scale is somewhat wonky. If we're really grading everybody then a 10 would be your Victorias Secret models and a 1 would be someone who is physically deformed. The vast majority of people are somewhere between a 4-6 on this scale.

Frankly I think there are mainly three groups of people. 1) People you're extremely attracted to and proud to have on your arm. 2) People you can have sex with and are pleasant looking. 3) People you won't have sex with.

Everyone is searching for people in the first group.

[–]cynicalhousewife points points [recovered] | Copy Link

7 is still pretty far above average. Of course they would. I have seen men go fuzzy around 5s.

[–]En-Zu0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I suppose more what i meant was that they can't really tell the difference between a 7, 8, and a 9.

[–]tempintheeastbayEndorsed Contributor2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe they mean, 1-10 on a scale that is graded on a curve according to your life's typical population :p

[–]JackGetsItEndorsed Contributor0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

At least on my scale 8, 9, and 9.5's aren't supermodel hot. 10's are supermodel hot genetic celebrities but might work at the diner. 11's are celebs and 10 plus hot. I also find that most 18-25 girls are above a six but below a 10.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

My wife doesn't have 2 physical traits that I wanted in a spouse. You could say that I settled. However, she possesses qualities that I never considered. these qualities have made our marriage strong for the 10+ years.

It is obvious that I didn't know everything I needed in a spouse. She is truly God's gift to me.

If she leaves me, I am going with her.

[–]vanBeethovenLudwigEndorsed Contributor[S] 2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Which qualities did you never consider until meeting her?

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

She knew how to talk to me. She used flattery in a way that I KNEW what she was doing but she disarmed me with it.

She was an extrovert and at parties would go off and mingle and allow me to chill.

She had a gentle strength and vivacity that I hadn't seen in any woman in a while.

On my list, she was about 70% of what I wanted. On the list of what I needed, she was 105%.

[–]tempintheeastbayEndorsed Contributor2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

this is really beautiful. if it's not too personal can you give an example of such "flattery"?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

She just lays it on thick when she is complimenting me. She has charisma so it works very well.

Mind you, I feel loved when affirmed so it is great to have someone who affirms me very easily.

[–]vanBeethovenLudwigEndorsed Contributor[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

She knew how to talk to me. She used flattery in a way that I KNEW what she was doing but she disarmed me with it.

That's interesting. I had an ex-boyfriend that came from a culture where women dress pretty sexy, but somehow he said he was never attracted. I didn't understand why...until he told me he was attracted to my brain. Something about being able to have fantasies together and have that connection (sexual or nonsexual) but to him that mental excitement was more stimulating than the visual.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I can appreciate that. I am attracted to sexy but making love to my mind is really sexy.

[–]needforhealing0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

May I ask which two traits she didn't have? I ask because I have tiny boobs, and have been told men want big boobs only, and that's a deal breaker.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol.. Not true. Each man's definition of big boobs differ. Am a boob man myself but I would have still married my wife if she was flat chested.

[–]loneliness-incEndorsed Contributor14 points15 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

A man who chooses a woman who thinks the world of him is not settling for less. Not one iota. This trait is way more important than looks to most men. (As important as looks are...)

[–]testmypatience0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Without it the journey is going to be extremely unpleasant.

[–]TheLaughingRhino points points [recovered] | Copy Link

A lot of people are just plain mean. Unfortunately a large subset of that group are women, partially because most understand that there is a clear double standard in terms of how society tolerates men versus women.

Chris Rock said it best, most men understand there are certain lines you don't cross and things you don't say, unless you want to fight. At some point, guys will start punching each other. However women can often be as vicious as they like, and men just have to sit there and take it. Can you walk away? Yes, but often life has obligations. You can't just walk away all the time at work. Or your best friends wife going nuts on you. Or your sister. Or the lady at church who is best friends with your aunt. I suspect this is why there is the trope about the uncomfortable family Thanksgiving dinner, where tensions are high and lots of people hate each other. Obligation and proximity are bad mixes for peace of mind.

People wear "masks" every single day. There's the real person underneath, and sometimes it's just a good person, inside and out. Then there are some who are just plain vicious and entitled, but pretend to be civil human beings, until they don't get what they want, or hear No, and then the mask falls off face.

This 2nd type, this is the kind of woman no man wants to marry. Obviously the prettier she is, the more she can get away with this behavior with most people and most men.

Do men "settle"? I think since most men are forced to pursue and most men are in the 80-85 percent who struggle to get any female attention, then most men just take what they can get. Most don't have a ton of choices. The work factor is different too. You want to keep a woman, its ALOT of work as a guy. You are often in a position if you want regular sex and some semblance of peace, you have to "manage her expectations" In doing so, a calm and gentle and nurturing woman is a much much more desirable situation.

The "contrast" is very jarring as well. If you meet a truly feminine and nurturing woman, it's such a shock sometimes, because so many are just plain vicious and entitled ( I'm not saying all men are peaches either, most of them are scum too in my book) There are good people, but to see their value, the contrast has to be sharp most of the time. There is a lot of "non quality" out there, and I'm not talking about SMV issues.

Sometime a guy discovers as he gets older, that unattractive women can be just as, sometimes moreso, unpleasant as a pretty one. There are a lot of women who are socially seen as physically unattractive who are just plain mean. And angry. And bitter. And that mask falls off fast too. Most men think , if I am going to have to jump through hoops no matter what I do, why not for a pretty girl?

I suspect the MGTOW movement is not quite completely validated by many women because I don't think many women have come to terms that some men cannot get over their base irritation with most of the women they meet. ( And who am I kidding, there are probably women here who want to say, Screw this, to men and dating and relationships)

Best advice to anyone, see a relationship candidate under heavy stress. Under duress and hard times. When the mask falls off, what do you see. If it's the same nurturing and caring and kind person, that's gold right there. A guy will marry that person if he understands her value.

Sadly, I think most men date and marry for "their own desires" and more women are going to factor in how being with that guy makes her look, how he helps her value, how he shapes the world's perception of her. I think that's part of why status is such a huge marker for women. If a guy of high status who could pick anyone picks you, it validates that you are special and it validates it against every female rival, every woman who jilted you, every negative thing you heard or believed about yourself. Most men I think just want blowjobs and steak. While most men will show aversion to very heavy women in public, I suspect most will just not care much about status as the same marker. Beauty yes, but the other status elements are usually disposable.

The higher your status as a guy, the longer and stronger most women will hold that mask up. I don't think it's a question of better quality in most cases, I just think it's a question of how much value you have to the other person, and if it's worth it to them to hold that mask up longer. I think this is where a lot of anger comes in with feminism, it's a system where the mask drops, if it's even put up at all, and you can still get what you want ( half the money, the house, the kid, carousel, etc)

I have met a few women I think are genuinely "sweet" people. Just good and kind people. Most though, I see, will turn on you once they don't get what they want when they want it. Most men don't see it though, they think many women are "sweet" but it's just focused restraint because the tradeoffs are too high right then and there. And usually women like that, they resent you for their choice of holding back or they consider you in their debt for actually being civilized.

Good people are truly truly truly hard to find. Embrace them when you do find them. Fat, tall, short, wide, blue, red, purple, Martian, honestly, at some point, who gives a shit. If you fill your life with good people, truly good people, good things will happen for you. I truly believe that.

[–]vanBeethovenLudwigEndorsed Contributor[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Love this comment. Thank you for writing it.

[–]ReddJive5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

It goes back to the a foundational message of RP in general. One, like many, that get buried and uncovered once in a while.

For whatever the reasons we are no longer taught how to pick our mates/relationships.

I grew up in the "old world". My grandparents immigrated to the US from the old country. I grew up in a cultural ghetto as they were affectionately called back then. Good times, masculinity, femininity dripped from walls. I could tell some pretty funny stories of my grandparents.

I ignored much of what my dad and grandfather said. Now I shake my head, they were right. All this... is right. Spot on. It was instinct with my grandparents and the men in my family. Just how it was done.

I was once asked is sex and a hot looking girl all a man wants from his relationship. I said no. though sex is top of the list, and will not likely come off the top spot, the other things: how she adds to his life. How she stimulates his mind, creative endeavors, supports his mission and goals. She just knows what to do, how to support...it's just there.

As I see it...it's yin and yang. they can survive apart. Functional well separately, but together they are a greater whole acting in unison for better harmony.

hard to achieve? Yes. we are no longer taught this by our parents. This is why the mentoring on RP forums is important.

[–]youreallmeatanyway8 points9 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

According to this theory, doesn't this mean men also "settle" for the "beta-type" woman who adores him, when he would actually prefer the 8-9 because they're more attractive?

If attractiveness was the only criteria for long-term partnership then yes, this would be an example of settling. But we all know that there is more a man or woman chooses than simple hotness.

Therefore I dont see this as "settling" but more of a process of maturation of the priorities and criteria an man uses in mate selection.

[–]Willow-girl7 points8 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

I agree! I don't buy the idea that 30-year-old women are "settling" for beta husbands, either. I think their criteria changes when they start looking for husbands and fathers for their children. In both cases, male and female, looks are probably less important than character and personality traits when it comes to LTR.

[–]WeCaredALot3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I've always thought the same! In fact, some of the women in my family encouraged this -- sleep with men you find physically attractive (using protection of course) but marry someone who's actually good marriage material. This phenomenon of women sleeping with good-looking guys, wanting to marry them, but then settling with a beta because they're too old/unattractive for the good-looking guy is only something I've seen on Reddit. Even my current female friends choose from one set of guys when they just want to have fun and then a different set when they're looking for something long-term.

[–]JorixKienu0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Even my current female friends choose from one set of guys when they just want to have fun and then a different set when they're looking for something long-term.

No controversy intended and just for my curiosity / information : they treat the "long term" kind of guys the same of the "just want to have fun" guys? What are the differences, if any?

One obvious difference ( among the other than you'll tell me, if you wish) that I'm curious to know about is : they feel the "long term" guy as attractive as any other attractive guy ?

Thanks in advance for your answer.

[–]WeCaredALot-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

From my perspective, it seems like they treat the 'long-term' guys more seriously. They generally act less frivolously around them if that makes sense. But then again, I think their behavior is also heavily influenced by the environment in which they tend to meet and interact with long term vs short term guys. The hot, 'short term' guys are/were generally the guys they partied with or met online. The 'long term' guys for the most part seem to be guys they choose more for compatibility and for their long term character traits/prospects -- i.e. a man who takes the relationship just as seriously, men with good jobs and nicer, more loving personalities.

I actually don't know how they feel about the looks of the two groups of guys. I've actually never asked whether they feel one is more attractive than the other; it seems to be mostly the non-physical characteristics that separate the two. But from my personal POV, both sets of men are physically attractive; the short term ones just seem more bro-y/fratty (not always in a bad way) with their personalities than the long term ones.

[–]merlinsmoon-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. Common sense.

[–]renegade1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Indeed. Looks fade. Personality, charm and intelligence doesn't.

[–]Shaela9017 points18 points  (17 children) | Copy Link

I believe both men and women learn to 'settle' after a major disappointment, either in other people or in themselves. When we`re young, we think we can have the world at our fingertips, but that is not always the case.

Time and time again I see, among friends and acquaintances the same scenario: Guy in his early-mid 30s, smart, successful, ambitious and at least decent looking (either a hot body and average face or really nice features but not working out) who spent a good deal of time (3+ years) in a relationship with a hot, entitled, somewhat smart and very socially savy woman(think an at least nice looking woman with a lot of fashion sense, class, culture, expensive hobbies and interests - not a tasteless, basic bitch) providing for her (sometimes) at the expense of his personal financial/lifestyle improvement. Relationship ends after a while, either as the guy gets fed up of having most of his money sucked in or she leaves, as she found a better provider/partner. Only after living through this experience, these otherwise pretty alpha guys learn to value a woman who loves them to bits, is not as hot or entitled, maybe smarter but definitely not as socially-savy, who they eventually marry.

Now, 'settling' is not necessarily a bad thing, I see it more as acknowledging one's limitations. Those first types of women were in each case, although not always the best looking, a whole different league compared to the second ones. Are the guys happier with their wives? In the way of getting a home, family and children, yes. What I can see in them is a loss of drive though, their wives never manage to stimulate them to achieve and be more. With time, their attraction to their wives drops, as these women don't really know how to keep it flowing, being too eager to please, too homely, too motherly, too invested in the relationship, too upfront. The guys start 'growing old' of sorts and lose that 'spark'. However, this does not mean either partner gets overweight, frumpy or bitter necessarily. For most of them this is just fine though, probably they figure out they never wanted more than a calm happiness anyways.

What's to note from this? A guy will learn his limitations and aspirations then marry someone 'under his level' somehow, someone who admires him, and that is wonderful. What can a woman in this case do? Never, ever stop improving her body and mind, not just in the kitchen or in the bedroom, become an individual who can inspire, stimulate and at times challenge her partner and never let that 'spark' leave his eyes. Have standards and never allow him to let the spark and desire to improve leave her either.

No matter what the RP tells you, high quality guys appreciate independence and a bit of a hard-to-get attitude in a woman, even after multiple years together. Or even more so then. Taste, culture, education, the right hobbies and an enriched mind really matter a lot, therein lies the difference between a 'used-to-be' hot girl who hit the wall hard and a post-wall woman who's still (or in some ways, even more) attractive. And I'm assuming the possibility of a multidimensional wife who's committed to improving and never truly gets old and matronly was the main reason which made all these guys I know invest so much money, time and effort in the first kind of women.

[–]ivegotsomequestions011 points12 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Really, whether a guy is settling or not entirely depends on his perception. If he's passionately in love, then he's definitely not settling, even if it's with a less attractive woman than he usually dates. If he's like "well, I don't want to be alone and she seems great," then he's likely settling, unless he's gotten to a point where he truly no longer fantasizes about the 8-9.

A guy will learn his limitations and aspirations then marry someone 'under his level' somehow, someone who admires him, and that is wonderful.

Yes, my dad is a case in point. He married my mother first—she was very beautiful and also incredibly volatile and, as far as I could ever see, quite unaffectionate and mean. She made his life miserable for over a decade and then finally divorced him. He remarried a VERY short time later to a much less beautiful but incredibly even-tempered, rational, and hard-working woman he met during the separation. They are still together nearly twenty years later, and he's a happy dude with a nice home life that he enjoys very much. To boot, she looks much the same today as she did twenty years ago and is now tops compared to other women in her age group.

He's told me that he got married again because he was very lonely and wanted a family, and my stepmother seemed like she'd be a good wife and mother. Was he settling? At that point, I'm pretty sure that he no longer had any craving to build a life with a beautiful woman—he really wanted the qualities that my stepmother had. On her side, I don't think that she expected an infatuated husband, she wanted and got a decent, stable man who loved her. He tries to be romantic, but really the meat of their relationship is in partnering to succeed and make sure their kids succeed. They are very happy and no one is secretly thinking that life would be better if their spouse was a supermodel.

[–]vanBeethovenLudwigEndorsed Contributor[S] 6 points7 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I actually went on one date with a man, late 30's, who was divorced. His ex-wife was a model and a professor but she didn't want children, and apparently she lied to him that she did, so while they were "trying" for a baby she was secretly taking BC pills. Anyways they divorced over this because he really wanted a family.

Even though the guy told me he thought I was attractive even though I wasn't "on the same level" as his ex-wife...something just made me feel like he was settling. I was the 7 that he settled for because he wanted a family, not the 9 that he originally wanted to have the children with. Something about that made me feel pretty bad, I didn't care if he chose me in the end to have his babies, but just knowing he wouldn't have chosen me in the first place hadn't his model ex-wife lied to him, made me not pursue that relationship.

[–]ivegotsomequestions02 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

the guy told me he thought I was attractive even though I wasn't "on the same level" as his ex-wife

He actually said that you weren't on the same level? Yikes!

Yeah, I wouldn't want that deal either. There's no point in being with someone if they still harbor thoughts about the hot woman they used to be with.

[–]vanBeethovenLudwigEndorsed Contributor[S] 6 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

He said "I like what I see even if it's not the same level" yeahhhhhh....nope!

[–]tempintheeastbayEndorsed Contributor2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

WTF

[–]vanBeethovenLudwigEndorsed Contributor[S] 4 points5 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

high quality guys appreciate independence and a bit of a hard-to-get attitude in a woman [...] Taste, culture, education, the right hobbies and an enriched mind really matter a lot [...] a multidimensional wife who's committed to improving and never truly gets old and matronly

Does any other RPW feel like we're also "WGTOW" in the same way that RP men feel like they have to hold frame, never stop improving, keep lifting? Like we also have to keep improving ourselves (physically and mentally) or else we become too boring for our men? Doesn't this go both ways?

We can never feel too comfortable in ourselves even as "inherently invaluable" women because of the above reasons.

Am I just being cynical?

[–]Shaela9012 points13 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I first started working out religiously 6 days a week more than a year ago. At about 6 months in, I was feeling so down and depressed about it thinking 'is THIS constant treadmill of soreness, making sure I get enough sleep and keep a close eye on my diet, while squeezing in work and career improvement, hobbies, relationships and everything else, how my life has to look like from now on if I am to maintain the body I want?'. Pushed on regardless and sometime around the 9 month mark, my whole point of view shifted. I now found I was looking forward to the workouts, they seemed less long and difficult, started seeing results from actually getting a good night's sleep and a healthier diet. I felt ... incomplete every time I had to miss a workout, like I've skipped brushing my teeth. That realization was the best moment of my life as of yet, the moment when I TRULY improved, when I became the girl who works out to look good, when I 'shed my old skin' so to speak. Before that, I was just trying to build a habit, but after, that habit became a part of me, just like ... caring for my hair. I think this can be done with anything and I felt it gave me immense power over who I can be. For the first time in a long, long time, I felt proud of myself.

Constantly trying and reminding oneself to 'Keep a sweet disposition', 'Be feminine', 'Keep lifting', 'Hold frame' are just ways of creating a new individual, to master oneself if you want. When you are unable to do anything else but 'keep a sweet disposition', that's when you have become that individual. It's a long, hard process. Just like learning to walk. But once you've done it for so long, no excuses, that it becomes YOU, it's not hard anymore, it becomes an automated process, just like you always put on clothes before leaving the house. That's why some of the wannabe alphas on TRP are so full of hate, doubt and bitterness. They have not become alpha yet and are still struggling, trying and focusing, all conscious brain processes which require huge amounts of energy.

Everything comes at a cost, not always monetary. Saying you want something means assessing the necessary cost( energy, time, effort) and paying it until you get whatever you want. Everything else is wishing. When you think about it this way, you realize how little you truly want in fact.

Also, both men and women become bored of one another. Let's say maybe a woman won't cheat out of boredom but how long after her man stopped trying to improve himself or surprise her, do you think that spark of admiration and desire for him in her eyes will last? Not much. That's why the women I wrote about in my original post eventually left the guys. Not necessarily because some other dude might have more money to blow on them, but because they got bored and they had standards, and options. Options who were, maybe, more driven, more ambitious. Options who do not necessarily mean other men. Just something better for them and what they wanted out of life. What the poor guys over at TRP trying to hold frame and dragging women into their frame don't realize is they are digging their own graves. They'll never respect or desire for long a woman who has no frame and no life of her own. Then they just shudder, saying it's male nature to want multiple females. A truly happy relationship does not happen between a mom and her son, like feminists see it, but neither between a baby girl and her daddy. There's a difference between being happy (which usually means a lot of work and discipline) and having some fulfilled fantasies or alleviated frustrations.

I truly believe the only point of our existence is constantly trying to improve, until there's no way but improvement, yet this is surely a discussion for another thread. Just wanted to explain where I come from.

[–]Gardrothard3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

What the poor guys over at TRP trying to hold frame and dragging women into their frame don't realize is they are digging their own graves. They'll never respect or desire for long a woman who has no frame and no life of her own. Then they just shudder, saying it's male nature to want multiple females. A truly happy relationship does not happen between a mom and her son, like feminists see it, but neither between a baby girl and her daddy.

Nailed it.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Before that, I was just trying to build a habit, but after, that habit became a part of me, just like ... caring for my hair.

I can completely relate. What an epic epiphany <3

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

It always horse back to the same old rule of "never stop working hard for your SO". It's that simple. However modern society has changed and warped things so badly that we had to create a group on reddit to help teach us this again.

[–]Shaela902 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Yup, we choose and vet your SOs with the intention of them becoming the most important person in our lives, the ones who know us best. Why not work hard to make them proud of us? I can't think of a higher boost to my self esteem, mood and spirit than knowing the most important person in my life is proud of me. That alone deserves every second of hard work I put into myself.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well said.

[–]vanBeethovenLudwigEndorsed Contributor[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Thanks Sadie for this comment. Sometimes I put so much pressure on myself to be the best I can be and still feel like it's not good enough, but somehow the way you worded it - "never stop working hard for your SO" made it sound more comforting than my frantic thinking, ehehe.

[–]testmypatience3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Only after living through this experience, these otherwise pretty alpha guys learn to value a woman who loves them to bits, is not as hot or entitled, maybe smarter but definitely not as socially-savy, who they eventually marry.

Also known as reordering your priorities to fit reality.

[–]merlinsmoon1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't think the one they marry is necessarily the guy settling. Perhaps the first woman was "settling" for them, in many cases I think they are. However, overall, I agree with you and enjoy your post(s)!!

[–]Ihatemost1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Any advice you would give to that first type of woman to become a better partner?

[–]Shaela903 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Depends:

  1. If they were looking for something serious, they should have set their expectations straight internally( no need to shout it out, just gently weed out guys who they thought didn't have long term potential), vetted better with their expectations in mind, and probably had to try dating a bit older, more established men. It all depends on who you are, what are your expectations, what you and your partner can each bring to the table and where each of the two are willing to compromise. The women I speak of were really bred to be 'goddesses of light and fun', either by their parents or by themselves, but not much else. I see no problem with that, honestly they were all amazing women, so savy about fashion and themselves, they managed to always look polished without necessarily being really, truly beautiful, very skilled conversationalists, well versed in art/music/literature/cinematography, extremely cultured, well-travelled, encyclopedias of places to visit and things to see, all savoir-vivre which takes a long time to master, especially on their own, but very little practicality. They had decent corporate jobs but were not interested in careers. Honestly, they were the kind of women I'd see marrying either a more mature, fine gentleman/businessman of old money to whom their know-how could provide an asset, or some young money guy who needed a bit of polishing into the fine arts to truly become a gentleman. They all truly liked these young, smart, ambitious men, but were not the type of women you could expect to build something with. Yet they had a certain charm most women do not possess, which was mostly knowledge about beauty and fine living and the conversation skills to really boast that knowledge in an enchanting way. Which man would not be smitten by such an enchanting woman when coming home from work? Also, and bear in mind this my personal opinion entirely, based on my experience; maybe it works different for other women: In order for a woman to truly love a man, she must first and foremost respect and admire him, she must see him as her intellectual superior. I cannot imagine how else she could truly yield to him, a prerequisite for any successful relationship's dynamic. This is a different thing than surrendering, it's more something along the lines of giving herself to him, because she knows him good enough and she respects/admires him. You could say that love would equal truly knowing your partner and admiring him for what you know about him. Now, the trouble lays in that we either admire people because we don't know much about them or know people and stop admiring them more or less.

  2. If they were looking for a bit of fun along the way, which again, is no problem, sometimes certain experiences can be true eye openers, they probably should not have spent all that time(in one case, 7 years) with guys they knew they would not stay a lifetime with.

[–]Nyquil-Junkie2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

An 8-9 is as an 8-9 does. Who wants to live with a self absorbed cunt just because shes "hot"?

These rating numbers are part of what causes dating problems. Like mom said, pretty is as pretty does.

Your 5 could be anothers 10.

[–]AlphaWeaboo2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

No because you are talking about smv, and what matters is rmv, and the rmv of the sweet one is higher, so you are in fact not settling, to settle would be to take the sweet 6 when there is an equally sweet 10 but you can't get the later

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I think it depends on if the guy is looking for an LTR or a ONS. I also think it depends on how high value the guy considered himself.

[–]nozmi2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Guy here.

Sure, attraction is the first barrier or first thing I look at before approaching a girl... but the reality is, I'm thinking about my future family too.

And a woman, no matter how hot, should be capable of being a caring mother and wife. If she's not, then I don't care much for her.

It's not "settling", it's choosing who to bang and leave and who to have a relationship with.

[–]tempintheeastbayEndorsed Contributor2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

If a woman picks a guy whose SMV is "higher" I think this often means he's ambitious, smart, on track for great things (at least in my eyes, I couldn't care less about looks). That means the more time goes by probably the more attractive he becomes to her (as he continues to ascend in the world).

If a man picks a woman whose SMV is "higher" this often means she's just incredibly hot. This will depreciate over time.

I assume the theory is that men choose high RMV women, because those qualities hold their/grow in value, as your love and relationship deepens.

I don't think the idea of a "beta" woman is even part of RP theory? Or is it? What is a beta woman? For that matter...what is an alpha woman?

[–]vanBeethovenLudwigEndorsed Contributor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Are you familiar with Dr Toni Grants four facets of female personality? They go like this 1) Courtesan (Lover), 2) Mother (Nurturer), 3) Madonna (Counselor), 4) Amazon (Warrior). She says the most ideal relationship is being mostly a Courtesan but also switching to Mother and Madonna for sustainability. I'd imagine alpha females would be mostly Courtesan and Amazon while beta females are Mother and Madonna.

[–]JackGetsItEndorsed Contributor4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Redpill men that value loyalty might take the 6-7 if they have no 8-9 options but the vast majority of men take the 8-9's regardless of personality if they have access to them; which is basically why lots of 8-9's can have such horrid personalities, it doesn't matter.

Men just like women lie to themselves and say that the other partner has some redeeming quality.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Priorities.

We love a great set of tits, but over the long term, being pleasant far outweighs it.

Frame it as

  1. be attractive

  2. don't be unattractive

and it makes more sense

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well... 7/8? I mean... that is subjective.

Let me give you a brief example.

At the gym, I see a woman, very attractive. Most people would say:8-10. She wears a push-up bra, and low-cut top. She's looking for attention. Thing is: she's married.

Another woman I know from work dresses like she's going out to the club all the time. Tight-fitting dress. Low-cut tops. She's looking for attention. She has a boyfriend.

These women are looking to move up. That is clear.

Other women I know dress comfortably at the gym. They look good, but they don't show it off. If you look at them, most people might say 7, or maybe 8. But when they dress up they look just as good as the others, but they aren't looking for attention. They have the man they want, and they aren't interested in having other men ogle them.

So the difference between a 7 and an 8 or 9 is really about perspective, and presentation. If a guy is making a long-term commitment, he's going to want somebody who is attractive but isn't trying to show every potential suitor everything she has.

I don't think it is settling: it's just a matter of not looking for a climber.

[–]Effervesser0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes. That unless they develop a fetish for moderately attractive beta women because they associated them with enthusiasm and positive experience early on. Then that becomes the new 10 for them.

[–]Banincoming0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Why would that be settling? A woman who loves him and supports him has more value than one who secretly despises and will cheat on him regardless of their hotness value.

[–]fetchyminx1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah but apparently physical appearance matters more

[–]bowie7470 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

It depends what you value..

But yes everybody can settle. Every has an SMV therefore everybody can in theory hunker down with someone of lower SMV in exchange for gaurunteed comfort.

[–]fetchyminx0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

After all these divorce rates you really think men settle for the 6-7 sweet girl...

[–]InfiniteAscent0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

An 8-9 who is entitled and bitchy isn't even going to LTR a man. She's going to ride the CC until she starts to decline, and then she's just going to be entitled and bitchy. When I was young, the hotter girls I dated were not stable relationship material, they were just playing around because it was fun for them and they could do whatever they wanted.

[–]LOST_TALE0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Any rational method to estimate the long-term

sweet and thinks the world of him

for how long? I feel safer with foreign shady dealings than with commitment to women. Just dig up some stories at TRP. I also don't have a hard counter-example.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

yeah, the dynamics of attraction are such that we are attracted to those that we are biologically programmed to be attracted to. For men that's women that are youthful and beautiful, and for women that's typically men that are strong, confident, moneyed, high status, tall, muscular, etc. None of those things mean that someone is going to be good relationship material, nor do they mean that someone is going to be a good parent. I think a lot of people of both sexes chase hotties when they're young, and then use a more complex algorithm - not just raw sexual urges - to find partners for long term relationships and marriage. I can confirm that I am a man that will settle for the "beta-type". Narcissism, greed, and entitlement in women can ruin us financially. Look at the chick in the video below. She's fine as fuck, but do you think dudes look at her and think "I want her to raise my kids"?

https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=2a7_1491956326

[–]refelgallo0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

I can only speak from personal experience, i was married to a 7 that thought the world of me. the adoration only went so far. I was a better cook than her, and I make a few good meals, casseroles and pastries. Even though I did not keep it in my pants (I cheated several times) for various reasons and in some cases no reason at all. My ex has admitted to me that aside from cheating I was a good husband. Planned family trips, events. Provided for the family etc.

Divorced

Now in a LTR with HB9 very feminine, much better cook than I, supportive and if she has any issue we discuss them. Though it took 9 months of monk mode and eventually spinning some plates. This is by far the best relationship i have been in. Nor have I had the urge/desire to cheat.

[–]ivegotsomequestions07 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

This is exactly why men shouldn't settle for something less than what they want. If they had a choice in the matter, most women would prefer to stay single or wind up with a less-attractive guy rather than get the "good-husband-but-he-cheats" package.

[–]Willow-girl4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I would take Quasimodo over a cheater, lol.

[–]mindplaybyneo0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

really tho, its not how much of the looks. its the values they have. Most of my exes tells me, I treat them right, looks good, and has a good career, But I never go for HB9. Also the connection matters a lot. I only dated average girls, since HB9 are way too way caught up in their heads. someone's 10 is someone's 4. and N-count matters for me.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2023. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter