~ archived since 2018 ~

Pearl's 2 cents on YouTube creators

October 9, 2022

It has recently been brought to my attention that there is an "RP" YouTuber who also goes by Pearl. In case you were wondering, she is not me.

I've seen her mentioned through a couple different sources and so I briefly checked her out. She has the same very basic RP content that you would expect of a newly red pilled man. She's just a prettier package.

Much of RP thought has been watered down and neutered. Instead of telling men (and women) how to have solid relationships or better themselves, these creators are adding to the divisions that they lay at the feet of feminism. It is outrage content and not worth anything beyond entertainment (if you are into that sort of thing).

The best of the red pill shows us what we have to work on in ourselves and helps us to understand our partners. Shows like this and like Fresh & Fit don't do that. If you want content, go back to the old blogs when smart people were developing new content. What exists now is facile and NOT created to make YOUR life better.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/RedPillWomen.

/r/RedPillWomen archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Title Pearl's 2 cents on YouTube creators
Author pearlsandstilettos
Upvotes 105
Comments 71
Date October 9, 2022 1:46 PM UTC (1 year ago)
Subreddit /r/RedPillWomen
Archive Link
Original Link
Red Pill terms in post

[–]gotgame740 20 points21 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

RP youtube overall is terrible. I admit I got sucked into it for a while as "entertainment", but eventually I realized it's just red meat designed to get attention and clicks.

The "real" RP is on all the blogs, and old posts here and on TRP. Everything has been watered down, I agree.

Also, I'm a guy, but I'm not sure they talk about this on TRP

[–]breemakin 19 points20 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Girly is just making her money of sad, low value men who want to screech from the rooftops “see even a woman sees how unfair it is”.

It’s very performative but good on her for making a buck lol.

[–]Beneficial-Bowl-69191 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

That's a very pathetic & shallow summarization of what her ideology is. One can never agree 10,000% of what the other says but when she brings up about the "Me First" selfish/toxic culture that has so blatantly bled into the West, she is 100% right on that. We folks in the East irrespective of gender put family first, which current America severly lacks, leading to the continued development of broken souls, generation after generation. Pretty pathetic honestly, and something a surface-level imbecile can never fully comprehend, but that is understandable coming from where you are haha.

[–]breemakin 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh wow, did I hit a nerve?

How much money did you give her?

Edit to add: I’m not American nor do I live in/anywhere near America.

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I had a look at some of her content after yesterdays post from someone being disheartened by her. I fail to see how she’s red pill, I’d say she more falls under the frame of honey badger if anything but even then she isn’t saying anything to support men, her videos are predominantly damning women.

There is nothing feminine about her, certainly not in appearance - physically and aesthetically the word that comes to mind when looking at her is sloppy. She can’t help her genetics but she could work on her clothing, styling and mannerisms which are extremely masculine.

I’d say her entire persona is masculine. I watched a video on which she was a panel member, the video itself was actually quite good and the man and other women contributing to it were interesting and held good discussion. Pearl had very little to contribute apart from frequently mentioning that she came from a family that was in the 1% of financial earnings, that she was in the 1% of female athletes and could go pro (except that she didn’t think female athletes deserved to be paid highly) and other rather bizarre attempts to position herself as a superior person in the most masculine way possible.

She confuses “not like other girls” energy with femininity which I suspect comes from a place of fear. She did mention that she would see being single and childless at 40 as a failure and condemned women for their poor choices that led them there. Yet she herself is single! She also mentioned that she barely knew her father growing up, from a few other things she said it appears that she’s trying to win mens approval now by acting like one.

Sadly for her, I can see her ending up exactly as she fears - aged, single and childless as there is nothing famine or appealing about her. I certainly wouldn’t let someone like that make me feel bad about myself!

[–]chickennogget 9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I stumbled on her content on youtube and couldn't watch through any of it and this is exactly why. Something about her (including what you listed) just gives off very masculine energy which turns me off from her content. There's no grace in the delivery and it's 100% just "not like other girls" type RP content.

[–]pearlsandstilettosModerator | Pearl[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm not sure that I get the aesthetic she's going for. A couple people have mentioned her looks and I have to assume that the no make up thing is a part of the act. It sets her apart from the women she talks to and makes her seem less of a done up party girl in contrast.

I have a friend who is similar in appearance and doesn't wear makeup because her husband doesn't like it. She's not unattractive and when she's done up she is quite lovely. I imagine Pearl#2 is the same.

The single thing explains a lot though. When you don't have your own experience to fall back on, all you can do is repeat what you are told. One would hope that she has friends experiences to draw from to give nuance to the basic theory but I didn't see it and it seems like very few RPWs saw it either.

But overall I think you are right about it being a very masculine persona that she's putting out there. It would make sense to at least balance that out with a more feminine look. Who really knows what is going on there.

[–]KombuchaEnema4 Stars 67 points68 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

I’m really disheartened by the number of female YouTubers cropping up whose entire shtick is “I’m anti-feminist and I am going to validate all RP men’s complaints about women.” As you said, it’s ragebait.

They will play a video of some obviously-shallow influencer saying she wants a man who makes 400k/year and then offer like 30 seconds of bland commentary along the lines of: “That’s insane! Most men will never make 400k/year! How can you expect that?”

But they will never turn around and say to men: “Hey, maybe you should stop pursuing gold diggers and Instagram influencers. Learn how to vet women. If you keep finding yourself dating shallow women, evaluate yourself and find out why you choose these women.”

They’re the female version of male feminists who white-knight for women.

[–]Teacup0001 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

They’re the female version of male feminists who white-knight for women

At first, I was tempted to suggest that this is likely a better relationship strategy for women than it is a sexual strategy for men.

In general, I do believe it's attractive and advantageous in the dating market to be sympathetic to the opposite sex's struggles. Men self identifying as feminist is too far for me. Maybe women self identifying as MRAs is too far for men? Would it turn off the average man, and only appeal to disgruntled RP men?

[–]free_breakfast_Endorsed Contributor 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It would be flattering at first, but you can usually tell there's something off about those types of people.

My thoughts is that it would be similar to the feeling when you have someone pursuing you only because of your ethnicity. We like people who like us initially, but there's usually a gut feeling this is a novelty fetish for them.

[–]pearlsandstilettosModerator | Pearl[S] 15 points16 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

I have to give props to the original creators of RPW. Those women really understood how to take red pill theory and apply it to women. I think they leaned more trad than I do in my understanding of it but overall this is the only content I've ever seen that doesn't just regurgitate what the men have to say.

And yes it's quite disheartening when you have a woman with a large platform who can't even take the content and apply it to her own existence with any nuance

[–]brushshstrokes 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Who were the original creators? And do they have their own posts?

[–]pearlsandstilettosModerator | Pearl[S] 6 points7 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Some of their content is in the wiki, some in the history and some over at r/redpillwives. I'm not sure what names to tell you to look for but so many have deleted their accounts anyway that I'm not sure how successful it would be.

We try to bump stuff up every September to keep the original ideas in the forefront.

[–]brushshstrokes 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Thanks! Also I watched the interview of you on the channel and you looked pretty!

[–]pearlsandstilettosModerator | Pearl[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Thank you so much. 🙂

[–]Ok_Obligation_61101 Star 13 points14 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

You summed it up so well! I watched a number of this YouTubers videos and got very frustrated because she seems to think she has some perfect formula for what men want and seems to only ever bring on certain women to humiliate them or use them as examples of ‘what’s wrong with modern women’ with absolutely no nuance on behalf of how most average men or women behave. She constantly tells her female guests that they’re worthless in the dating pool because they’re not ‘young virgins’ and is a cheating apologist (she frequently talks about how her grandmother was married her whole life to a man who slept around and she put up with it because hey he’s paying the mortgage! And even encourages women to do this now, but of course this doesn’t go both ways in her mind). It’s especially interesting as she paints herself as an expert on what men want while she herself is single and is clearly spending a lot of effort on her podcasting, dare I say girl bossing herself?

[–]Euphoric-Chain-51553 Star 13 points14 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

She's not putting effort into anything, she is a prop in someone else's stage production.

First of all, there's tens of thousands of dollars of production equipment visible in her videos. Now you can handwave that away by saying she's independently wealthy through her own efforts or inheritance, but simple wealth doesn't explain the knowledge required to select or utilize it. There's no "learning curve" visible if you compare her early videos to her most recent ones.

Her channel was started in April and she's got 179 million views? C'mon guy, you gotta be more subtle with your astroturfing.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Her channel was started in April and she's got 179 million views?

She got big on Tiktok not YouTube, Tiktok eventually banned her.

First of all, there's tens of thousands of dollars of production equipment visible in her videos

Her dad is extremely wealthy, although from the sounds of it he doesn't really understand what the redpill even is.

I think she might also have autism, which would explain alot.

[–]Ok_Obligation_61101 Star 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Fair point!

[–]zelicara 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

She regurgitates Rollo Tomassi so much. I think he pays her or has propped her up somehow.

[–]_Pumpkin_Muffin5 Stars 18 points19 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

She benefits from telling her audience what they want to hear, and to attract views with shocking content. We can't expect anything different.

[–]pearlsandstilettosModerator | Pearl[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't blame her for this. I don't blame anyone who does what works for them. I do feel a level of frustration that all I have seen from people who come here after consuming Fresh & Fit is a very very rage bait understanding of RP. It leads me to believe that todays content is missing the part of RP that was designed to help people improve.

I don't know this woman and I've only checked out a bit of her content and it seems similarly basic. I also have been asked if I was her and figured if one person asked there are others thinking the same.

[–]warm20 7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I don't agree with her when she mentions men only want young women, It's true that most men may seek younger women however, a mature man wants to build a legacy, take care of family and his wife in general, if he can find that in an older women, he knows the wisdom to go for her over a younger one.

If he isn't able to bring kids, then you'll see various of choices, some go for deeper meaning in long term relationships, while others abort relationships (your mile age may vary).

However in maturity here it's expected of them not to play around as they see it as childish.

I don't agree with her when she says it's alright for men to cheat because their different, I believe deep integrity and dignity in a man if he's truly of high value, he would never do that as he'd stay loyal and finds his relationship meaningful with his woman and family where he would never do such a thing.

He doesn't need to play games. After all self control/self awareness/self reflection is something a high value man excels at and is far away from being impulsive/compulsive as he is stable in thought mostly. That's how he manages to get his results in real life from being a good provider to being good for the family in general.

[–]pearlsandstilettosModerator | Pearl[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Everything you are saying shows the nuances of these topics. Super basic RP tells you that men want younger women. It's not wrong but it's a sort of "all else equal" premise. And what men want and what ends up happening for most couples isn't always congruent. Statistically most couples are within a couple years of each other. So as women our takeaway should be to use youth when it's on our side but it shouldn't be to despair when it isn't.

[–]ayllie_01 13 points14 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

I’ll confess that I have done some research on this specific person. Her points are all outdated and less about lifestyle changes or adopting a more conservative approach to life, but more of a ‘modern women have hundreds of body counts by the time she is 30’. In her videos she refers to overweight women as ‘whales’ and her way of name calling women is mostly for the shock factor. She wears dresses that look like they are straight from Margaret Thatchers wardrobe and strives of men admiring her in the comment section. All of the videos I have watched of hers are insults and clearly point out the obvious.

Another thing, that I’m ashamed to admit, is that I do not trust certain content creators when it comes to how they present themselves. When I was younger and watched hundreds of make up artists (among them nikkituturials) I had met her in person during a meet and greet. This was before the video of her ‘coming out’ was released and she confessed. I hate to say this, but the same gut feeling when I met Nikki for the first time in my life I have with this Pearlythings person. Who knows though. This would explain the hatred towards women.

[–]pearlsandstilettosModerator | Pearl[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I will LMAO if you are correct about her. I suspect that it's more of a combination of clickbait and youthful self righteousness. But I also do not discount people's gut feelings these days. Time will tell.

[–]Euphoric-Chain-51553 Star 1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

I didn't know who nikkitutorials was so I wasn't certain I knew what you were implying until I looked her up, but:

I'm pretty sure JustPearlyThings was born a woman, but I'm still glad you called her a tranny.

[–]Underground-anzac-99 1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Oh come on, of all the criticisms of her you’ve gotta revert to that?

[–]Euphoric-Chain-51553 Star 9 points10 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I don't revert to it, I just didn't have a problem with someone else doing it.

But yes, I do believe she should be bullied off the internet. I would say she's acting in bad faith, but I don't believe she has the level of awareness required for it. She's not producing her show, and she's not making her own editorial decisions - someone else is, and they are acting in bad faith.

A 21-y/o does not spontaneously, with no prior knowledge or expertise or resources, create a channel that immediately averages 1 million views per day at a sustained rate over six months.

She is an artificial creation, brought to you by corporate entities who are not looking out for the best interests of young women, and they're plagiarizing organic content from - among other places - this subreddit. Where is your sense of justice about that?

[–]Underground-anzac-99 2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I’m saying calling her a tranny. The rest of the criticisms are valid, she’s vapid and spiteful.

[–]pearlsandstilettosModerator | Pearl[S] 6 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I think that people are on the look out for men dressing as women these days. It is an unfortunate effect of the trans movement on more masculine featured women. We've become suspicious and would rather be wrong than "tricked"

[–]Underground-anzac-99 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s not a nice word to use. Most trans woman don’t hate other women and just want to get on with their lives like any other person.

[–]stripe_throwaway1 points [recovered] (7 children) | Copy Link

!|Well dang it! I thought I'd doxxed you!|!

Jokes aside, thanks for confirming my suspicions!

[–]pearlsandstilettosModerator | Pearl[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yup you got me 😂

I actually did a show very briefly with one of the TRP ECs but then I had a second baby and it just got to be too much.

[–]pieorstrudel52 Stars 2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Our Pearl was a guest on a red pill you tube channel. I do suggest everyone watch that. She delivered great content and looked cute to boot!

[–]SunshineSundressEndorsed Contributor 6 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I loved that series! I used to listen to it on repeat in the background when I was cooking or doing chores. You can really tell the difference between that, where all the people involved were endorsed or mods on the rpw/trp subs, and this new second generation of “rp” content creators who never bothered to participate on these subs (aka never bothered to actually look into the theory).

Not once was there any rage bait. Even when the core topics were the same, the discussion was always productive and civil. There was no unnecessary arguing and screaming, outrage content, or antagonistic attitudes. The goal of the channel was to HELP the men and women who came across it.

[–]haybay727 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

This is a great point. She often says the things that the sound like something she thinks bitter men might want to hear. She says fathers shouldn’t have to pay child support because “women shouldn’t be rewarded for bad behavior.” This statement contains no nuance. What if a married man abandons his wife and children? The mother may now technically be a single mother but not bc of sleeping around or “bad behavior.” And while child support laws are very inconsistent and often unfair to men that doesn’t mean men should get off Scott free. It’s not uplifting men to say that they aren’t capable of taking care of their children. I feel like she takes any chance she has to say bad things about women in an attempt to make men in her audience happy… or maybe she’s simply rage farming. It’s not uplifting to men or women.

[–]LoveWitchXo 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Where can I watch?

[–]Forsaken-Savings4370 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I will say Pearls friend RealFemSapien actually encourages how to better yourself and for solid relationships

[–]Zealousideal-Key5902 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

she has no source for her statistics and even when disproven by professionals on tiktok people blindly believe her like sheep. its dangerous. most of her facts are false and can't be proven. who is she trying to benefit here but herself? she doesn't care for SAHMs because she shames single mothers. she airs the dirty laundry of her own mother for petes sake! she seems very anti-woman in general but also hasn't done anything proactive so support men, just tell them what they want to here and get them angry so they continue to support her and pay her rent (indirectly but who knows maybe she got a sugar daddy that would be ironic lol). pearl keeps dividing people and no one profits but herself. a dishonest person with poor credibility.

[–]anothergoodbook3 Stars 7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

My husband will watch sometimes which drives me crazy. He at least disagrees with most of it. He said one time she said something along the lines of influencers being entertainers. He even cautions me to remember that whenever I watch anyone - to take it with a grain of salt because they are entertainers trying to gain a following at the end of the day.

[–]pearlsandstilettosModerator | Pearl[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm laughing a little bit at your husband. Mine would also caution me about people that he himself watches.

I think what gives me pause the most about this particular one is not "influencers are entertainers" but that she's obviously highly produced and has money behind her and it seems like she's perhaps gotten popular fairly quickly which means that the YouTube algorithm is promoting her. And I think I much prefer something more organic even if it is entertainment.

[–]servitor_dali 8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Shes mega cringe

[–]Veganflamingo77 8 points9 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Hmm Pearl isn’t what one would call a pretty package lmao.The way she white knights for guys is difficult to witness

[–]pearlsandstilettosModerator | Pearl[S] 10 points11 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

That's the schtick though right because she's really playing to a male audience.

[–]Veganflamingo77 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

She is. I guess she doesn’t have the looks to ingratiate then that way, so being a pick me works for her.

[–]SunshineSundressEndorsed Contributor 11 points12 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I much prefer our Pearl in terms of beliefs and how she conducts herself, but I don’t think it’s necessary to comment on how the YouTuber Pearl looks. Her looks aren’t the problem - and you can certainly be a successful RPW regardless of your what your SMV is - the problem is who she chooses to appeal to. Let’s be above the antagonism of people like Fresh and Fit or Kevin Samuels who NEED to mention women’s looks in order to bring them down a peg.

[–]Veganflamingo77 -1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

It’s not at all to bring her down a peg. I bring it up in response to the way she speaks about SMV and how beauty doesn’t matter past a certain age. She is rude, and I agree some of her guests are rude too.

[–]SunshineSundressEndorsed Contributor 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, but just because she is rude and talks about SMV doesn’t mean her looks should be scrutinized. I feel like that kind of attitude may make RPW more catty and judgmental and that’s not what this community is about.

[–]CountTheBeesEndorsed Contributor 2 points3 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

I watched a podcast with her on in which she said she was single. That explains a lot because I had pretty similar opinions to her when I was single (eg the state of mind I was in when I wrote my first post - Why You Should Read TRP). Some of it is cringe to me now, but that post served its purpose - kickstarted a lot of conversation and engagement. I haven't watched any of her solo content but from how people describe her in this thread I can see lot of my own experience in that, and like all phases, it passes. It's not called an anger phase for no reason. I think she also said she was 21? Yeah I would cut her a LOT of slack. Who knows maybe having a younger anger-phasey rep out there is a good thing??

There's not really a place to "catch" females out there in the anger phase. TRP is for the men. RPW is for women who, hopefully, never have to go through it. I did and I said much the same things people are complaining about in this thread.

I had a look at one of her videos just now - "The Whales Have Returned | They Harassed My Family" and in the comments -- "I heard your honest podcasts and have lost 16 out of my goal 40 lbs, thanks Pearl you're like a big sis".

Going through the rest of the comment section, her fanbase is about 30%-50% female. So I think it is neither fair nor correct to say she is a pickme or pandering solely to men or that she doesn't help anyone. Like sure that user could be fake, but there's another one further down: "your whale talks have actually helped me. Married mama of 5, 50 lbs overweight. I'm down 5 pounds so far doing keto. Thanks for the motivation!"

I really like that she's a dedicated athlete and I really like that she doesn't wear makeup. I'll take your word for it that she doesn't know much theory but maybe that's not the end of the world?

[–]pearlsandstilettosModerator | Pearl[S] 6 points7 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I remember being newer to RPW when wherehaveallthegoodmengone was created. It was funny at first. A few years later, it's not funny.

You are right that there is a anger (or self righteous or not-like-other-girls) phase that women can go through. I've also seen guilt but that's not relevant here. Is there a benefit to watching another woman be angry at more blue pilled women? I don't know. Whatever motivates you to do the work is good right?

I am so far past the self righteous phase of thinking women who don't get it are something to be publicly mocked. RPW is accessible to anyone whether you are young and virginal or post wall and promiscuous. The point is happy relationships for anyone who wants to use the tools, not happy relationships for anyone who followed the right path since they hit puberty.

But that's my take and if she is helping women find their way, well I am not trying to stop her.

The comments- I do believe that she's an astroturfed performer. There are too many views over too short a time and it is too produced to be organic. That doesn't mean some of it isn't real but we can't assume that all the comments are legit either. It's like saying reddit karma has meaning. We can be flooded with non-rpw downvoting something into the ground and that doesn't mean the comment isn't valuable (ditto with upvotes).

[–]CountTheBeesEndorsed Contributor 5 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I remember that too, and I can agree that WHATGMG is hard/too sad to read now. But it represents a certain stage of development. I couldn't be who I am now without going through what I was then. Maybe she is not genuine or maybe she is but her financial backers are not genuine. But she represents a certain subset of the community which I think is well intentioned even if they can't act in accordance with the intention (YET).

Constantly running through my head is the thought, if JustPearlyThings read this thread, or anyone who was in that phase who finds her relateable read this thread, would they think this thread is good feedback worth listening to, or would they see it as vindictive? Unfortunately it is currently the latter. There's a lot of assumptions of ill intent which I think are not warranted. RPW has more in common with them than we don't. I think it's not a good move putting them offside. As you say, not everyone's done the right thing since puberty and not everyone's done the right thing since taking the red pill.

Her total subscriber count is 466K. Let's say half of them are fake bots, I think Elon estimated 11%on Twitter? Let's make it half, round it waaay up. Then say 50-70% of those remaining are male. That leaves us with about 70k-116.5k women. RPW's subscriber count is 62k. Numbers wise, we simply can't afford to alienate them. If you want to take them by the hand, tell them what they're doing isn't going to work, ok, we can do that, but not like this.

[–]pearlsandstilettosModerator | Pearl[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

The thread has taken on a life of its own. I simply did not want people thinking she and I were the same person.

Beyond that, my thoughts on the current content on YouTube is quite congruent with how TRP has always approached the newest guru. They wrote articles telling men that Jordan Peterson was not actually their daddy and more recently warning that Andrew Tate is not their friend.

We don't recruit. We just put information out there and if it resonates then that's great and if it doesn't people can go search for what does.

I don't judge anyone who wants to consume her content. Since I've basically Streisand Effected for her here, it would be really weird for me to turn around and condemn her viewers. But if she showed up and read this thread, I'd be happy to have a discussion about what she knows and her experience and if she thinks that insulting women is the best teaching method.

Ultimately we (you and I) will have to agree to disagree on her because I can't change that my gut tells me these currently popular YouTubers (of which she is only one but she's the only one who uses the same name) are a hindrance and not a help.

[–]CountTheBeesEndorsed Contributor 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The thread taking a life of its own is exactly what I mean. It seems to be opportunistically baying for blood. It's ugly to witness. The same people saying shaming doesn't work... Are shaming her. Gives me a very bad taste in my mouth. Especially since she may be less RP knowledgeable than us, is single, and not in a happy relationship of her own. She might have a larger following but merely these factors make her our junior and the established happy wives taking potshots at her are punching down, not up.

I responded in this way just so one EC could be seen to not be participating in the condemnation. Whether she is a hindrance or a help I don't know. You've been here longer I'll trust your gut. But I know exactly what her followers would think if they came across her being called a tranny, a pickme. I remember being called that and no, it did not make me a better person, it made me double down. Pickme, hilariously, was a word used to describe US by FDS and now we're using it. Sigh.

Like it out not she's RP and Yes RP does have this effect on certain women and it frankly shouldn't be surprising. Maybe they need a sandbox or something to vent in. Long term I predict they will all 'graduate' into a more nuanced understanding but that takes time and when they get there it would be nice if they didn't have a bad impression of RPW.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

She claimed to be 25 in video I saw yesterday so I think she’s old enough for some maturity to have set in. I don’t believe you can shame anyone into changing, which is evidently her approach

[–]CountTheBeesEndorsed Contributor 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Alright I got the age wrong. And sorry, I was exactly like her ~2 years ago and I was older than 25. Negatory on the assumed maturity.

[–]DOlsen13 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

I think it's mainly clips of her that appear in shorts that are more geared toward outrage, but if you actually watch her content it goes a bit deeper. She and RealFemSapien have some great content beyond just what makes it into the 5 second shorts.

[–]pearlsandstilettosModerator | Pearl[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I didn't watch the shorts. I did see one out in the wild but when I someone asked if I was her I went to her channel.

[–]DOlsen13 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Ah I see. I assumed shorts because the shorts algorithm has been feeding me a ton of her stuff

[–]TheBunk_TB -1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

(...making content to benefit yourself and not reach across to anyone outside of "the herd".)

It is for clicks and made as you said from "a prettier package". She has no benefit from telling people to work together. I have mentioned "the herd" before. It might sound like a jab, but I see it often.

[–]pearlsandstilettosModerator | Pearl[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm not sure what you mean by the herd (I could use context clues but...)

I am fairly confident that someone has put this girl in the position she is in. She is playing a role for clicks and money. And no, she owes nothing to the world and she doesn't benefit from a show that gets no clicks. But we (the world) need to remember that fact when consuming some of the current day RP content.

[–]TheBunk_TB 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

"The herd" was an immediate group or clique.

[–]Waxflower8 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Amen. I know exactly who you’re talking about. I like that she brings regular women instead of OF girls and Instagram models like Fresh and Fit does (then sleeps with the exact women they judge afterwards but anyway). She has a much wider perspective of women actually being a woman herself but she’s still feeding into the overly obsessive nature that runs the community amongst men especially young men/boys.

[–]Waxflower8 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

What’s the name of your channel? Didn’t see your link in your bio.

[–]pearlsandstilettosModerator | Pearl[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

I don't have a YouTube channel so much as a handful of old shows that I did and ended fairly quickly because life got in the way.

It is getting passed around upthread so I'll drop the link here but my intention with this post was never to compete with this woman ya know?

[–]Waxflower8 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Oh yeah of course. I just misread your post.

[–]pearlsandstilettosModerator | Pearl[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

All good 😊

[–]somersaultinsand 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't throw this out flippantly, but I believe Pearl is a "I'm like other girls..."

She rather be the object of hate porn than actually prove that she understands any of the things she speaks about.

[–]Cultural-Research518 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Very well articulated

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2023. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter