It seems to me that encouraging men to give away their sexual services for free to any woman who will accept them, no wait, that's not quite accurate, more like, brainwashing men to perpetually almost completely subsidize women's sexual experiences, is an EXTREMELY BAD idea. These subsidies take the form of call courtship expenses, and all sexual advances, including the social risks incurred, as well as all the time and energy that goes into THINKING about pursuing women, whether it is courting them or seducing them. If you court them like a Beta, they take your money. If you seduce them or conquer them like an Alpha, you are still investing significant resources purely for the purpose of providing unpaid sexual service to a series of women. Women who do this for men either get paid for it, or are looked down upon as sluts. Some people on here purport to love sluts, unless it is their LTR that's acting slutty. But they like it when other people's LTRs act like sluts because it makes them feel special, when in fact, they are degrading themselves by giving themself away. Part of this comes back to the shifting from sexual repression as a social control mechanism, to enslavement through expansion of libido to the point of perpetual depletion and exhaustion: people are now encouraged to be "sexually liberated."

Anyway, if guys stopped offering themselves to every woman that would have them, the market would balance out A LOT. I know that when I reject women, subtly of course, by never actually saying, "No!" but by deliberately pretending to be oblivious to their advances, it still keeps them chasing me, and actually inflames their passions. At the very least, I don't make an idiot of myself by slobbering over indifferent ice princesses who repeatedly communicate a lack of interest. Maybe said ice princesses would be less icy if men weren't constantly throwing themselves at them. I know, for me, that's it is a HUGE turn-off when a woman appears too eager to get with me.