Article here: http://archive.is/LLVDI.


15 percent of the female undergraduate students they surveyed said they were "raped, either through force, threat of force, incapacitation or other forms of coercion such as lies and verbal pressure."

Lying is now considered rape.

Sexual assault in the survey was defined as unwanted penetration or sexual touching (kissing, touching, grabbing or groping) or the attempt to do so.

Accidentally bump into someone? Rape.

Woefully few campus rapes are reported, experts agree, with about one in 10 assault survivors coming forward.

15% x 10 = 150% of women are rape victims, guys

The most aggressive is Huffman's Senate Bill 576, which would require all school employees, and even some students, to report instances of "sexual harassment, sexual assault, family violence or stalking" promptly after becoming aware of the incident, or else face serious consequences.

Under the bill being currently debated, staff, professors and officials at colleges who fail to report an assault without "good cause" would be charged with a Class B misdemeanor and would be fired, while student leaders like fraternity presidents who do the same would be suspended for at least a year or expelled.

There go the 5th and 8th amendments. You're not allowed to abstain from self-incrimination and will be subject to cruel and unusual punishments.

If you don't narc on the people around you the secret police will come in the middle of the night and you will never be heard from again. Stalin would be proud.

Data on the numbers of incidents of sexual violence would be gathered and disseminated to the campus president once a month. The president would then report to their board of regents twice a year. Campus presidents and campus sexual assault coordinators who fail to make these reports would be fired

Let's add another layer of bureaucracy to push tuition costs even higher.

Other changes would protect the anonymity of students who were assaulted by making their information private, and prohibit schools from retaliating against people who report assaults in good faith even if the information turns out to be false.

Make all the false reports you want with zero repercussions, just make sure it's in "good faith."

The public testimony on Huffman's bill was largely positive, and she enjoys the support of the panel's female members from both parties.

Wow, no shit. Women feeeel good about work that makes no sense and accomplishes nothing.

But some Republican men on the committee expressed concerns with the the bill. "I think you're on the right track, but I am profoundly concerned with the rights of the accused."

Look at this fucking rapist talking about rights and shit.

"I understand your concerns, but I feel strongly that we have to be tougher. I realize these reporting requirements may be the most stringent in the country, but...Texas must lead the way."

Your rights end where her feelings begin.

Watson wants to require every school to establish anonymous online reporting tools for sexual assault victims and witnesses, and make sure students aren't punished for underage drinking or breaking a school's conduct rules if they're reporting an assault, the threat of which many Baylor students said held them back from coming forth with their allegations.

There goes the 6th amendment, the right to face your accuser.

So a 19-year old freshman slut can voluntarily go to a frat party to get drunk and high and fuck all the Chad bros, she can then anonymously report them for rape and be forgiven for any laws that she broke in the process. Weaponized entrapment is a beautiful thing.


I'm curious how they're planning to enforce this. If Person A sees a rape and doesn't report it, this law would only work if Person B observed Person A seeing the rape and not reporting it, but then Person B would have to have seen the same rape and would be guilty of the same crime by not reporting it themselves. You end up in a feedback loop so how the fuck would that even work?