~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
manofire
[–]Panzer_Geist 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Soon to be engineer here. Don't worry about us. Pretty much all of the female engineering prospects dropped out as freshmen or sophomores. The ones who are left wouldn't receive any sexual attention even from the most perverted minds.
This raises another interesting point. Why are unattractive women always the ones who want to get into male-oriented lines of work? Perhaps they think that they can meet men through their work or some such. Honey, just major in English and hit the gym.
[–]Bippzy 1 points1 points1 points 9 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I know at TRP we tend to have a mix of how to deal with women and men's right's stuff. We point out situations where women are involved and realize how it must be dealt with differently compared to if everyone was a man. There, evolutionary psychology helps TRPers come out on top.
What you say here is anti female. Every gender should be allowed in every profession, it's an obvious conclusion from the human sense of justice. Furthermore, (and I am well aware that I am saying NAWALT) women who choose not to reproduce or are career oriented enough(they exist in the upper middle class) avoid the problems you discussed.
Responding to your numbered points: 1.Yes, affirmative action shouldn't happen. I agree 100%. However, nothing can be done about women quitting their jobs to bear children. It's one of the only female privileges that really must work this way in capitalism.
Success in engineering and not having children are not mutually exclusive traits.
Men who can handle themselves and understand the way humans interact and females who do the same can accomplish a productive multiple sex workplace, nothing about the redpill says that men can't work on teams together if one of the members of the team is a girl.
In conclusion, it is unfortunate that men tend to be a better investment in the sciences, but women are by no means a massive liability and they should be allowed to work in these fields. Also, you come across as a female hating extremist("everyone who caused this should be executed") and there is no justification for that speech.
[–]manofire[S] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Wow, "anti female?" The fuck does that even mean? 1.Before accusing someone of being "anti female", you first need to explain why "anti-female" is wrong
© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]Panzer_Geist 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bippzy 1 points1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]manofire[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link