Feminism is about Population Control

IllimitableMan · 2013-10-29T20:04:35+00:00

I read some shit on the internet ages ago saying elite jewish bankers wanted revenge for auschwitz so they essentially funded the already existing feminist movement and propelled it from "the occult" into the mainstream to reduce the caucasian gene pool. Now that is a conspiracy theory, whether it's true or not I have not enough information to accurately deduce.

Now, coincidence or conspiracy, whilst the caucasians are flooded with multiculturalism the Jews for the first time in history got a nation to call their own after World War 2 by displacing the muslim population of the previous British Mandate of Palestine and declaring it the state of Israel. The jews were meant to share Palestine with the arabs in a United Nations partition, but instead they took over most of the country and left the muslims with the gaza strip and the Palestinian territories which are tiny bits of land scattered around the borders of Israel.

The international community no longer recognises Palestine as a country post World War 2. Of course Israel is not multicultural, it's aim is to be homogeneously Jewish in religious faith. Israel is heavily funded by the US and has political lobbies in both the UK and US. Israel is also heavily suspected of having nuclear weapons and has amassed an impressive military but it has no UN sanctions imposed on it whilst simultaneously Iran gets threatened for even trying to construct a nuclear powerplant.

The funny thing about the lower birthrates in the traditionally caucasian countries is that these same countries introduce multiculturalism and mass immigration as their base population dwindles furthering the dilution of the base culture, there are people out there who truly believe there is some sort of plot to wipe out the caucasian race because there are no homogeneously white countries left, it's the only major race on the planet at the moment (not a minor race as in - inuits, aborigines etc) that cannot call one nation it's home, the ancestral homes of the caucasian ethnicity in Europe have been flooded by third world african and islamic immigration under the attempt at unifying Europe into one federal superstate like the USA, this attempt is known as the European Union or colloquially "the EU."

The UK had almost negligible immigration until 1960, now it's a multiculturalist utopia in the main cities, a quick turn around in the past 50 years. Letting Pakistan into the commonwealth and inviting muslims from rural villages who operate in a tribalistic culture to come and live and work in the UK had to be one of the most perverse measures the UK government ever implemented, an extremely bold social engineering attempt.

A now dead British parliamentarian The Right Honourable Enoch Powell who stood for the conservatives among other parties, a role model for the also now dead Right Honourable Baroness Margaret Thatcher economic policies decried the emigration of pakistani villagers from rural Pakistan into UK towns and cities, he was a Cambridge educated man with much public support and was known infamously for his anti-immigration speech "rivers of blood" to liberals he is an abomination, to nationalists and those who wanted to maintain a homogenous culture, he was a hero for having the balls to stand up and say NO.

The same site provided some graphs saying at current birth rates, caucasians would go from 36% (I think it was 36? It was quite high, my memory elludes me here) of the world in the 1950 to a lower double digit figure of around 11-12% in 2050, making them the fastest declining ethnicity and probably the second smallest major ethnicity overall. Now If these statistics are correct, I wonder if in 2050 whites would get ethnic minority privileges, or would the now ethnic majority continue to enjoy their old privileges and protection from scrutiny on the grounds of racism? That's an interesting can of worms.

Tokyo and South Korea also suffer from low birth rate and feminism, but unlike the caucasian nations have not adopted mass immigration and multiculturalism and thus maintain traditional homogenous cultures.

I love making controversial posts such as this, it will simultaneously enlighten and piss off and really test the mettle of one's social programming. I look forward to responses.

semigod__ · 2013-10-29T19:31:51+00:00

no, this is not what feminism is about.

feminism is among other thing responsible for lowering the birth rate, but that is certainly not the point of feminism - rather an unintended consequence.

but natural selection should solve this problem by itself - and culminate in a violent conflict between old inhabitants and new inhabitants, just as you could see in lebanese civil war.

2013-10-29T19:02:31+00:00

the right to birth control was a cornerstone of 2nd wave feminism, and i think that was a good thing. i am very happy that most high class girls i run into are on birth control.

however, the long-term result will be that the muslims and hispanics will take over Europe and the US, respectively, simply because they breed much faster. i really don't give a shit ether way.

SammyD1st · 2013-10-29T19:40:48+00:00

I think you might be interested in my small sub that looks at how fertility rates shape demography: /r/natalism.

lazydonovan · 2013-10-29T18:30:34+00:00

Interesting hypothesis. You forgot the Muslims. They also have large families and are pretty hostile to women having any sort of leadership role (save leadership to other women),

cossackman · 2013-10-30T01:28:58+00:00

One positive is feminism has brought down the price of pussy. You used to have to put ring on a woman to get her to put out.

If you're an very attractive male - all it takes is a $4 coffee and any woman is yours.

For the rest of us - you can find an attractive sugar baby and she'll be your plaything for $500 to $1000 a month.

Most 18 - 22 year olds are in school, barely paying the bills (unless their biological dad is covering it) and thus they'll jump on any man's pole if it means extra money to buy nice clothes or have a vacation in the summer.

jakenichols · 2013-10-30T11:21:10+00:00

This all has to do with the UN's Agenda for the 21st Century, which is a political action blueprint for all UN nations for "sustainable development", it deals with overpopulation BS scaremongering like that. Read Chapter 24, its all about "women's empowerment" and getting women into the workplace worldwide. Women are easier to control and easier to appeal to emotion to, meaning that women "in charge" will do "what's right" more often, meaning they'll take orders from people who are "experts". Its literally a conspiracy, no theories here.

puaSenator · 2013-10-30T11:44:50+00:00

I find this logic common behind conspiracy theorists. They often see the end result, and conclude that it was the initial intent. For instance, the Boston Bombing has resulted in increased security during large events. Therefor, the Boston Bombing was done by the government so they could increase security during large events.

The truth is, these outcomes aren't planned nor are they desired. They are simply natural result of a higher level action. So in this case, yes, feminism is resulting in less children, and yes, more fundamentalists are having children. However, that doesn't mean it's the intent. In reality, feminism is the result of an abundance of resources and time amongst the educated and financially privileged. An abundance of education and wealth also leads to lower birth rates for a number of reasons.

Yes their is a correlation, but it's certainly not a causation. Feminism and low birth rates exist side by side -- one has not caused the other, but have instead have branched out from the same thing (wealth and education).

DafyddBreen · 2013-10-29T18:38:38+00:00

I 100% agree. A lot of population control is being implemented right now.

There IS an elite who control this Earth and population control is definitely on their agenda.

Weaker men, stronger more mentally fucked up women, economic despair, and now they are modifying our food. This all isn't a coincidence.

Spacelnvader · 2013-10-29T19:28:02+00:00

This is an interesting point of view. But if the aim (or one of the aims) of feminism is population control, this is absolutely the worst idea possible UNLESS it is not to have fewer children, but dumber children! Most "Super-Feminists" are quite clever business women.

Hypergamy does not allow them to settle for lower class (dumber, poorer) males. They want to have the boss, the president, the cream of the crop. Often, they sacrifice familiy for their career.

Women of lower education are often not as feminist and the lower you go, the more children people have, dumbing the population down in the long run.

Stupid people are easier to control. So if there is some sort of conspiracy, I am putting my money on this aim.

Nemester · 2013-10-30T01:25:33+00:00

Low fertility rate is an unintended and unanticipated consequence (to feminists). Feminists have never given serious thought to the long term survivability of an overall population that experiences prolonged low fertility. There is no conspiracy.

GridReXX · 2013-10-31T17:59:46+00:00

In cause/effect logic, yes the end result is a lowered birthrate.

But that's not why the woman's rights movement started.

Not sure why some guys have such a hard time understanding this.

We agree we're all human and have the same cognitive skills and similar capacities for a wide range of desires, wants, and needs.

Let's imagine that the roles were reversed and men were in the same position as women are/have been.

No one likes someone else dictating what they can/cannot do. No one likes having one option for a life. It doesn't mean there aren't women who would love to be homemakers/mothers, but the reason women protested is because that was the ONLY option and most women felt stifled, repressed, oppressed, helpless, etc... If she had the propensity to be a doctor/lawyer/data scientist, she was discouraged or flat out denied.

It's not a movement against men. It's a movement for autonomy, since men are not the only humans who like to do things on their own accord.

WheelbugScaphism · 2013-10-29T19:18:43+00:00

Is this a conspiracy theory?

Title	Feminism is about Population Control
Author	87GNX
Upvotes	21
Comments	70
Date	October 29, 2013 6:25 PM UTC (10 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/1phayl/feminism_is_about_population_control/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/feminism-is-about-population-control.7552 https://theredarchive.com/post/7552