Any social change in society has an inertia or lag of atleast a few decades, until society notices its full effect. This was mentioned casually in Unwin's 1934 "Sex and Culture", even though wiki credits it to some other guy. Unwin noticed that a change in sexual relationships had an inertia of roughly 3 generations (~70 years), since this is the time it takes for a society to fully remove any social restraints from the past. The defeminization of women is not a new phenomen. Even Nietzsche mentioned it in "Beyond Good and Evil", when he wrote
They want more, they learn to make claims, the tribute of respect is at last felt to be well-nigh galling; rivalry for rights, indeed actual strife itself, would be preferred: in a word, woman is losing modesty. And let us immediately add that she is also losing taste. She is unlearning to FEAR man: but the woman who "unlearns to fear" sacrifices her most womanly instincts.
This was in 1886. Around 1900, women got the right to vote in many countries. The social inertia (and also the 2 world wars) kept women in line, but 3 generations later they pushed towards the next step and initiated the sexual revolution around 1970.
What is the effect of the sexual revolution?
The answer is: We don't know yet. The full effect of the sexual revolution will become visible around 2040, as we still have some social restraints (e.g. "slut shaming" or provider mentality by most men), but anyone with open eyes sees the rapid transformation of society.
What I currently see is that society goes through a period of tinderization. Women try to maximize their alpha fucks during their peak SMV period and hope to cash out on a beta bucks when their time is about to run out; men adapt their sexual strategies by shifting from traditional provider roles to the emulation of alpha behaviour to pay the women in tingles instead of a secure home. The process of tinderization is still ongoing, and we can expect to see A LOT more of this in the future.
What is the endgame of the sexual revolution?
Following the "3 generations rule", we can expect to observe the full impact of the sexual revolution around 2030-2040. Interestingly, this is in line with TFH's "Misandry Bubble" that predicts an endgame around 2020.
However, I believe the endgame will be primarily determined by the economic impact of the sexual revolution. The economic impact however, as again an inertia of a few decades. On average, women are a net drain on society, while men are a net asset. In some countries, this is true for the average women at any point of her life, and even in more gender equalist countries where women work throughout their lives such as Denmark, women remain a net drain over their lifetime](http://www.dandebat.dk/images/1205p.jpg) (red line: women's fiscal contribution, blue line: men's).
The graphs you see were by men whose main sexual strategy was the strategy of provision. A lot of young men who in previous times would have hated their work but nevertheless kept doing it in order to provide for their family, have adapted their sexual strategies and get pussy by lifting and playing in a band, rather than being net contributors to the state. The young men that drop out today will reduce the average net contribution not only for today, but for the next 40 years.
The dropout of men in academia is not a problem for the young girl studying today. She will get cheered by everyone in the media and the president to show these stupid boys that women can do everything a man can do. But the following absence of high-income men in corporate positions will affect the girl in 10-15 years, when her alpha fucks period is over and she starts looking for a beta provider. The cohort of 35 y/o that whines about the lack of eligible men today, will grow even larger as the academic gap keeps growing.
What is even worse is the impact of dysgenic fertility. By pushing high IQ women into universities and 60-hour/week careers, you raise the opportunity cost for high IQ women to produce offspring. On the other hand, the increase in welfare state incentivizes low IQ women to breed, financed either directly through child support from a productive male or indirectly through beta men by taxes.
Who reproduces today is completely irrelevant in the next 15-25 years. It is only after that period it begins to matter whether the kid is of low IQ or high IQ origin, as it determines whether the kid will end up inventing new stuff as an engineer or steal and murder. Brazil is serving as a perfect example for this effect - it has the most dysgenic fertility worldwide. Just compare the world cup 1950 in Brazil with the upcoming world cup 2014 in Brazil. It will appear to be 2 completely different countries, but there was just 64 years in between.
These effects will cripple the welfare state in an irreversible manner. Even if some politicians in the future will notice the catastrophic consequences of their well-intentioned policies, it will be too late. In any case, what you can look forward to in 2040 is a huge amount of unhappy and jaded 50 y/o single women with cats and tats on their backs and arms. And a bunch of 25 y/o angry, low IQ males that are born today and raised by a low IQ single mom with help of your money. Go to Liveleak and take a look at videos from Brazil - it serves as a good indication of what young males without any perspective are capable of.
The endgame of women's suffrage was the sexual revolution. The endgame of the sexual revolution will be the collapse of the Western society.