You ever heard of a tribe with all chiefs and no indians? How about a tribe with all indians and no chief? Someone has to be dominant someone has to be submissive. Since the dawn of civilization and in 90 percent of mammals on earth follow this basic hierarchy. So how can we be equals if someone always has to be in charge?

When Indian nomads crossed the berling strait many years ago, they were one tribe who over the years spread out throughout north america. Why? Because when an indian felt he should be chief, and the chief tried to hold him back, he said fuck it i will move and start my own tribe.

Feminism isn't starting it's own tribe, rather it's like trying to make the war chiefs step down so they can become war chiefs without actually having to fight in a war. They want more women CEO, but not by starting there own companies, but by being in charge of already established billion dollar corporations with ceos in place.

Then you have the indians who don't want to be chiefs, they just want to be good indians. Have a nice indian life, with a nice big teepee with a two car garage. The problem is our war chiefs are greedy dumbasses.

So you want to be a chief, we're sorry we can't teach you how to be a chief, we had to cutback your education budget to fund our bullshit wars. Oh you want to be a good indian? Sorry, but we sent your good indian job ooverseas because their teepees are much cheaper to fund than yours.

So if I can't be a chief, and can't even be a good indian, the only thing left is to burn down the village.

So is the concept of equality a fallacy. Yes, because someone always has to be a leader. And leaders cannot be equals with their followers. Can our current leaders stop squandering our resources on stupid shit? Yes they can because if they don't the village will be burning real soon. We're already starting to see the embers.