Morality can best be thought of a set of safeguards to ensure the flourishing of civilization. Morality enforces order and promotes stability, which can only be achieved by suppressing disrupting male energies and subversive female energies. If these energies overcome the iron hold of morality, order becomes disorder, and civilization begins to crumble.

For a large part of human history, most of humanity was under the impression that morality was a universal, divine rule; dictated by the highest spiritual order, every man bound to it by kin and bone. The advent of science and technology has largely freed us from this view, it has lifted the veil and revealed the shaky foundations of morality: it is a human invention. And it is fallible.

Therefore morality insofar as we know it becomes a choice, albeit one made for us. Since the power of rule has been handed over to the people, morality becomes nothing more than democratic preference, tugged along the shores of madness by an insane, irrational mob. Whoever gains favor with this populace gets to direct where this monster goes, and order then slowly devolves into chaos.

In the absence of a coherent system of traditional morality, which while still a social construct, is an orderly social construct, we now have to revise our consent. It is no longer advantageous for us to adhere to an outdated system of morality, when little of all the benefits men enjoyed in the past by being honorable still remain.

Therefore, we have no duty owed to civilization. Civilization is only as strong as its weakest ruler, and mobs are weak. We have to make a choice. Do we remain bound by an outdated morality, embrace the new, fashionable anti-morality, or altogether transcend morality itself?

The answer, dear red-tinted reader, is to become amoral. It is to systematically deconstruct the social norms imposed to us and construct new ones, the whole benefit resting on us. We are to become supermen, devoted only to our own self-flourishing, since it is clear that society is not concerned with men at all, only with what we can do for it.

Therefore, morality for us becomes a cost-benefit analysis writ large. Our morality should be based on consequences and outcomes, and not on any order from above. We are now free to do as we wish, at a great risk however, of bringing about undesirable things if we are not meticulous about the way outcomes are handled.

To be amoral is to be free. To be free is to seize power. And to seize power is to bring your will into existence.