"The main point in dispute is to jump to personal attacks at the right moment..." (M. Zhanetsky). Getting to personality, a participant changes the focus from the subject of the dispute to uncovering ranking potentials. And if opponent's ranking potential happened to be lower then he instinctively subjects to higher rank thus admitting his defeat in dispute though he might be right in essence of this matter.
http://protopop.hotbox.ru/treatise.html
That link is actually a gold mine of Red Pill thoughts and since it's translated from Russian I can't help but begin to think with a Russian accent as I read it. (very funny to me having known some Russians)
Simple idea.
By creating emotional trauma you demonstrate rank. The emotional aggressor is always perceived as the higher in rank. Logic becomes useless.
Red Pill focuses on the rank... the "natural hierarchy" at all times so we see the world by rank first and by logic second.
Feminists win arguments by claiming higher rank, not better logic.
[–]moose_war 5 points6 points7 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]NeoreactionSafe[S] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]-Quotidian 4 points5 points6 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]1favours_of_the_moon 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]NeoreactionSafe[S] 1 point2 points3 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]NeoreactionSafe[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]NeoreactionSafe[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link