Philosophy, in its purest and most fundamental form, is asking a question.

Not the typical sorts of questions prevalent in the age of social media where most people have the attention span to post a quick status, meme, Tinder Bio, Tweet on whatever version of InstaTweetFaceFuck app is main-lined into their dopamine centers. Nobody wants questions on there. Nobody wants to formulate answers in-between deciding how to emit enough SMV via the internet to signal the world your ultra-chad McFucklord status and slide into some thot’s DM.

I’m talking a real question.

The power of a real question can tell you a lot about a person. A question that challenges who they are. See, most people are infused so deeply with the ideology which they have no idea IS even an ideology that real questions push their buttons.

The majority of people when asked a real question jump to defense, denial, and a whole lot of contempt prior to investigation. Ideology is often taken on because people believe the series of beliefs, ideas, behaviors, causes will have their best interest in mind. They believe the paradigm will get them somewhere. Questions will often prove if someone is deeply ego-fused in their sense of self. Do they explore or, stay open-minded or clam up and defend their little position because someone promised it will get them everything they want?

So, let’s ask one of these questions.

What if you’re not Red Pilled?

What if this entire fucking thing is one big smokescreen? How would you know? Who have you believed? What are the ends?

It usually goes something like this. Boy meets girl. Boy believes girl wants nice, polite, and to be put on a pedestal. Boy gets fucked-over and because he has an unconscious co-dependency on the approval of women he believes the ENTIRE world has ended. He believes women ARE the world. In his tragic spiral, he stumbles upon Reddit Red-Pill. He suddenly learns all about women’s nature. Boy believes he is red-pill. I mean, people tell him he’s red pill. All the signs say it’s red-pill. A weird and creepy old man who never spun a plate tells him he is ‘unplugging’.

Because Beta males are trained to follow other people’s lead, he believes it. The ‘red-pill’ fuses to some deep emotional core which needs to believe he has found the answer to the world, and the all illusive pussy, because nobody wants to point out he’s still as co-dependent and pussy obsessed as he always was. Consciously he knows a little bit more, but deep within that beta part hasn’t shifted, so a blind and unconscious defense of ‘RedPill:Women’ becomes the new trend. He needs a tribe, he needs reassurance. He needs the same advice said ten thousand different ways and ‘University’ to tell him how to simply talk to people. He becomes an autistic, self-conscious, weird guy who sees social interactions as something he has to win.

It’s all sort of weirdly illogical, but then subjective reasoning is great for ideology.

The concept of the ‘big lie’.

It’s helped ideologies sell ideas many times in history. Tell a lie so big people believe it. People love believing things if the instrumental reasoning of that belief serves enough of a purpose.

What if it’s all bullshit? What if this place offered you no more of a ‘university’ than kindergarten? What if you were still infused with society’s ideologies but with only some understanding of what makes women ambiguous?What if you aren’t red-pilled? What if everything in society is not some manifestation of a female’s sexual strategy? What if improving your SMV by watching YouTube videos about shit that’s been written years ago, hopefully becoming ‘Alpha’ McChaddeusfucklord the 3rd wasn’t going to save you? What if a bunch of guys making YouTube ‘Universities’ about the same tired shit are doing so because they didn’t actually know anything real to RedPill the fuck out of you? What if they don’t know how to shock your core to the system so how you think, feel, taste, and process the entire fucking world began to shift?

What if RedPill has become its own Overton Window?

Questions tell a lot about people. When asked, do they shut down talk of any ideas, authors, schools of thought which taps at their window from somewhere bigger? Do they defend a weird and creepy old irrational male author, but then reject every other one as required reading?

Do they promote ‘Universities’ about how to ‘hold fucking frame’ and ‘hyppeerrgamy’, but shut down any talk of men reading authors such as Evola, Lacan, Zizek, Baudrillard, Hegel. Who shut down telling guys to expand their intellectual stamina enough to read, write and process shit which questions the entire fucking picture of the world ou live in, in favor of ‘hold frame’.Sounds like ideology to me.

The push-back I get recently is ‘mur, what’s your actionable advice’? For some reason ‘RedPill: Women’ is built on masculinity where ‘Do a, b, c, and maybe get d’ is the only ‘action’ people understand.

The actionable advice is TO START FUCKING READING outside of this Overton Window and outside of mass-consuming the same shit that is pretty much adopted into main-stream ideas. ‘Be Chad, don’t simp, don’t cuck’…yadda yadda’. Ain’t too fucking extreme, against the grain and outside the norm when every zoomer fucktard is spitting it.

What if Lacan wrote about female psyche in a way that ‘hold frame’ gave you a far deeper understanding than just being a wooden idiot with no real original thought but the appearance of being immovable Chad.

What if Baudrillard makes you question the interwoven fabric of many forces that made you a consumer cuck who needed a site of anonymous men to tell you how to write goals on paper?What if Evola made you question the entire metaphysical destruction of society top-down, and gave you suggestions on how to spark masculinity which rises above it all? What if he argues a sexual strategy that over-shadows evolutionary biology?

Would you read them? Would you be curious? Or would you stick to asking for 'how to's' and up-voting self-help horseshit from guys with zero life experience? Sounds like a foundation of Alphadome. Would you defend? Responses to questions tell you a lot about someone.

But of course, the instrumental reasoning of reading outside the window is pushed back because it threatens the current ideology. It threatens people’s paradigms. It threatens people’s belief systems. It threatens with the question of, ‘what if you’re not red-pilled’?

Maybe you want to follow contributors who, after years in the manosphere think rehashing the same ideas on YouTube is really cool and Alpha. Maybe you want to stay locked inside what will soon be mainstream and part of the Overton Window. Maybe you believe an old man who never spun plates since being happily married blue pill is truly unplugging you. Maybe you want to watch a ‘University’ which treats you like basic, unsocialized retards.

Maybe you would rather spend that time having everything in your world challenged by authors who treat you with a little more respect than ‘how to dress like you have value’.

Questions. Questions are interesting….