Reddit tried to stop the spread of hateful material. Users turn to self-moderating platforms "an even more dangerous place." These self-righteous clowns believe themselves god, should have a say over what you think and say.

November 18, 2020
465 upvotes

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/TheRedPill.

/r/TheRedPill archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Title Reddit tried to stop the spread of hateful material. Users turn to self-moderating platforms "an even more dangerous place." These self-righteous clowns believe themselves god, should have a say over what you think and say.
Author redpillschool
Upvotes 465
Comments 111
Date November 18, 2020 2:26 PM UTC (5 months ago)
Subreddit /r/TheRedPill
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/reddit-tried-to-stop-the-spread-of-hateful.334679
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/jwgobg/reddit_tried_to_stop_the_spread_of_hateful/
Similar Posts
Red Pill terms in post
Comments

[–]Modredpillschool[S,M] [score hidden] stickied comment (11 children) | Copy Link

The words "hateful" and "hate speech" are stand-ins for "unapproved" speech. One of the biggest red pills you can swallow is the very fact that these asshats actually believe they should have a say over what you think and believe.

A man knows that nobody tells him what he can and cannot think and believe. If you didn't already think TRP was correct, look no further than where the thought police are targeting.

These ideas don't take hold because they're horribly incorrect and don't work. They take hold because it grants freedom and identity to men. Something the establishment desperately does not want you having.

There's a reason that censorship is targeting political speech just as much as it is censoring us. At the end of the day, the free exchange of ideas threatens their stranglehold on the culture. They need docile men they can control. Strong men are a threat to their plans because strong men stand on principle.

One such principle is free speech. The protection for men required for all other principles to matter.

This fight, I fight specifically for men to have a place to have unfettered discussion.

What they call "misogyny" is simply coarse language as a protection mechanism against the censorship of ideas. It's a trick to un-brainwash yourself from self-censoring ideas and thought.

When the matrix programs you, it teaches you not to think about certain aspects of the matrix. In religion, it blinds you to stark inconsistencies in the biblical stories. In politics and culture, it creates blind spots for men to prevent them from self-actualization and executing a high-return strategy.

You're taught that certain things are just "wrong" so you don't look further into it. Cutting yourself off at the knees. Things like:

  • Large age gaps are "creepy"
  • Men should not seek sex unless they are offering commitment
  • Men and women are exactly the same

These are blind spots that do not appear to the common man unless he looks for them and inspects them.

Using language that breaks you out of the mental mold is the first step to challenging long-held beliefs. Words that you've been trained not to say are the very words that can break your conditioning.

The minute we self-censor the very words we use, is the moment where we capitulate to the thought-police and prevent ourselves from exploring every topic, blind spot and idea to its fullest.

When we capitulate on language, we capitulate on ideas.

Our language is the litmus test for free thought. It's not a bug, it's a feature.

They used to teach this in schools.

[–]Endorsed ContributorRunawayGrain119 points120 points  (17 children) | Copy Link

Not only that, they now want to cast moving to platforms that aren't actively engaged in censorship as some sort of scary move.

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 77 points78 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

Not only that, they now want to cast moving to platforms that aren't actively engaged in censorship as some sort of scary move.

Right? It's fucking crazy insane scary when you consider the implications of what they're saying...

The internet shouldn't exist except the anointed approved websites.

[–]1arakouzo86 points87 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

The internet shouldn't exist except the anointed approved websites

That's more true than you think. The modern progressives literally have trouble making it through the day knowing that people like us exist.

The very fact that Trump has been president for four years has made every woman and every gay person and lots of colored people in America drown themselves in prescription medications because they feel like they just can't go on and the world is falling apart. That Trump guy never actually did anything to women or to gay people or to colored people, mind you. But just the idea that someone like him exists, and someone who would vote for him exists, made them feel like the whole world was falling apart, and they just couldn't cut it in this world.

25 year old liberal white women in Denver were running to their therapists and upping their Wellbutrin doses because they were petrified and felt like they couldn't breathe any more. All because this one police officer a thousand miles away killed this one black guy. This wasn't even about them. They're liberal middle class white women who have no fucking clue what it's like to be black in America. But the fact that this could even exist made it impossible for them to cope without anti-depressants and therapy.

The idea that someone anywhere might enter a grocery store without wearing a cloth mask, or that some states still haven't mandated mask wearing fills these people with dread. They have trouble functioning knowing that the government is not forcing everyone to do what they think is right. Forget the virus or masks for a second, because that's a polarizing issue, and just think about these fragile people. People who have trouble coping and feel like their entire world is falling apart because other people who do things they dislike are allowed to keep existing.

Fragile people feel like their entire world is falling apart if we are allowed to exist. It's not about them. It doesn't affect them. But like those middle class white women in Denver taking drugs to help cope with a dead black guy four states over petrified with fear and feeling like their world is ending, modern fragile people literally feel like the world is falling down if bad people exist.

[–]2Overkillengine35 points36 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

It's almost as if their talking points about "cis white male fragility" are actually projection of their own flaws on a massive scale.

[–]1arakouzo18 points19 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Very true. "I'm not weak! You are!" is just the beginning, though.

A 25 year old liberal middle class white woman accusing a hard working white man of "privilege" when she's had an easy life is the same kind of projection. She feels guilty because not only has she been afforded privileges a poor minority person doesn't have, but unlike a hard worker like you, she's wasted them. She's worse than either of you, so she feels a burning need to try to feel like you're worse than she is so she can be better than someone.

In the world of a crazy progressive-minded fragile person, every time (s)he is confronted with the slightest push-back, (s)he becomes furious because (s)he feels attacked. Contradicting someone's ideas is not a form of discussion. It's a form of attack. So any time you confront or contradict an idea, thinking you're just having a conversation and expressing your thoughts, you are immediately confronted with an accusation that you are "angry" and "fragile". Because in their world, discussing a different idea is an attack. And attacking is something angry, fragile people do.

[–]atelitus18 points19 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I find that most people who cry out loudest against fascism would absolutely be fascists for the right dictator.

They're only "anti-authoritarian" because they haven't found an authority they like enough yet.

[–]facepunchbowl4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

That is so fucking neurotic and scary that people cannot cope with anything being not their to their expectations that’s they fall apart and become this bad to other people.

[–]1arakouzo14 points15 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's scarier even than that. We have entered a world where an IDEA is considered an attack. The fact that an idea exists, even if nobody does anything to anybody else and just has an idea and expresses it, is an attack that must be prohibited.

Take that Trump guy, because he's such a good example. Trump didn't start a nuclear war or decimate women's rights or do anything racist against black people or do anything discriminatory against gay people, or any of the other stuff everyone seems to think Trump has done. Trump is just an asshole. Some of the people who voted for him are sexist, racist, anti-gay people, sure, but even they aren't doing a whole heck of a lot against other people. All they did is vote for Trump. Who didn't really do all that much to hurt anybody.

But the very IDEA that a man like that could exist and be made president, and the very IDEA that enough people live in the nation that would vote for him is so huge of an attack that it has rendered random 25 year old liberal white women in Denver unable to breathe. They've felt like they're living under a cloud for the past four years and only with lots of therapy and anti-depressants have they been able to muscle through this time period.

That Trump guy never actually did anything to them or anything that affected them. None of the Trump voters, not even the sexist racist ones, actually did anything to them or that affected them. They were pretty much completely unaffected by Trump's presidency. Yet they spent four entire years needing therapy and feeling like their world was ending. All because of the IDEA that an asshole like Trump could be president.

The mere existence of the idea incapacitated them, even though nothing actually affected their lives. The idea is what offends them and must be stopped.

Trump is a very recent and obvious example, but this same mentality applies to lots of things.

If someone tells you something feels racist and you don't think it is, expressing that you don't think something is racist is, itself, a racist act! You're denying racism! Have you actually harmed anybody or done anything that's affected anybody in any way? Nope, but the IDEA you are expressing makes it hard for people to function and must be silenced.

Is anybody on The Red Pill inciting anybody to violence, or actually mobilizing to take rights away from women, or really having any affect on women in any way? Nope. But the IDEAs we express here are considered harmful and must be stopped.

Does it actually harm a trans person if you call them by their biological pronoun or their original name? Are they actually affected by this? Should they even care if some random dude like you accepts their chosen gender? Doesn't matter. The IDEA that someone doesn't have to accept them is horrifying and must be stopped. And some random 25 year old liberal white woman from Denver who isn't trans is all for a law that prohibits you from using language that offends that kind of person. Because that idea offends her, too, and just living in a world where that idea exists is hard for her.

If you look around, there are all kinds of ideas that aren't popular, but aren't harming anybody. Doesn't matter. The existence of the idea is considered harmful.

[–]ferbje2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Wonderful post, put my thoughts better than i could have

[–]1arakouzo37 points38 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Normal people don't understand the elites, the politicians, and the business owners.

Reddit quarantining undesirable content is more of a "Not in my Back Yard" type of policy. They don't want advertisers to see us and they don't want bad publicity, but don't care what happens on any other website.

But the regular people's thought process goes something like "Censoring this speech and behavior is supposed to change things! It's supposed to stop the spread and get these people to change their behavior! Clearly this has all been a failure and we need to take more aggressive action!"

[–]1Ill_mumble_that31 points32 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's both.

If you don't think reddit has a political agenda, you're fucking blind.

But yeah, they also care about advertisers and keeping payment providers happy.

Kinda like how VISA blacklisted Andrew Torb because of "hate speech" on his platform that he refused to censor.

Then there is their slimy business agenda. "Going to one of our competitors is dangerous and hateful." Fuck you Reddit, what if my grocery store said that when I go to the place up the street instead? Seriously.

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Let's be honest here, controversy drives eyeballs. everybody knows it.

Anybody not courting controversy isn't popular or is lying about it.

[–]Fabulous-Craft8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Amazing how it continues to shift.

"They are a PRIVATE business and can censor", "Don't like it start your own".

And when you do, they advocate for the dismantling of that platform.

[–]NormalAndy3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

No doubt also why encryption is a big deal. It’s never been for terrorists and criminals, who are perfectly capable of operating outside parameters. It’s a way of making sure regular people self censor for fear of castigation by the herd and it’s nosy, paranoid shepherds.

[–]OfficialChrsLxndr1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol Parler censors anyone that calls you fascist cunts out for being fascist cunts. Incel garbage needs to stay in the trash

[–]ElegantCyclist2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It is important to write your own blog and form networks that are censorship resistant, whether by administrators or moderators.

Search engines also still drive a lot of traffic and you never know when the right person is going to be looking for a way out.

[–]stress-pimples0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

By definition, this sub is not "censored". It's quarantined. You're still able to say whatever you want here. Nothing is being taken down or taken away from you.

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil25 points26 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

The West is in steep decline and as such is no longer capable of handling dissenting ideas in a nuanced way, instead the best the academic shill priest class can come up with is to use words like "toxic".

In the mid 2000's we would at least get a coherent counterargument to our ideas. But years of affirmative action and diversity seminars have eroded the ability of academics to defend the ideology of the establishment.

Untill I see our opposition refute Schopenhauer's views on women in a semi coherent way, they are just gay shills defending the status quo for money.

[–]TRP VanguardWhisper7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

In the mid 2000's we would at least get a coherent counterargument to our ideas. But years of affirmative action and diversity seminars have eroded the ability of academics to defend the ideology of the establishment.

Not the ability (although that has eroded as well), but the need.

The goal of postmodern discourse isn't to discredit the dissent, but the dissentor. When an ideological monoculture has developed a certain amount of hegemony, it develops snarl words for anyone who dares disagree, which it employs in place of arguments: "toxic", "privileged", "racist", "sexist", "counterrevolutionary", "degenerate", "heretic".

This is not merely due to incapability, but due to the realization that the argument itself is only necessitated by the presence of a mass of skeptical observers. When sufficient ideological homogeneity has been achieved, you not only don't need to argue, but it is counterproductive to do so, because it wastes effort and legitimizes those you wish to discredit.

Saul Alinsky advised his fellow communists to personalize their targets, attacking individuals rather institutions because individuals bleed more easily. The same is doubly true of attacking individuals rather than ideas (since ideas are bulletproof). One of the chief advantages of the struggle session is that it not only makes a public example of the heretic, it often terrifies those who privately agree with him into publicly denouncing him.

Make no mistake... they are not operating like this due to inability to take the high road, but because they no longer see any need to.

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This is true

[–]zyzzguido555 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Funny enough lots of the feminazi women hate the Gays because they can’t control them.

If you’re not for the one world pussy worship order then you’re “toxic” and a “douche bag”

[–]1BlondeHornyElf2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

problem is tho that a bunch of people pointing fingers at a guy and labeling him "toxic" works 99% of the time

[–]1arakouzo79 points80 points  (21 children) | Copy Link

The whole point of speech is to communicate thoughts and ideas and feelings to other people.

The idea that you have to "stop the spread" of certain ideas, such as by preventing new people from discovering those ideas, is already suppression. Preventing the communication of the ideas (e.g., the "spread" of those ideas) defeats the very purpose of speech.

The idea that a forum is supposed to still be grateful that at least it's allowed to exist and speak at all is kind of silly when the entire point of any forum is to spread ideas.

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 48 points49 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

They say we're hateful and dangerous, but we're not the ones trying to exert control over others.

Anybody trying to push their will on other people (rape) is objectively evil.

Reddit, and the reddit admin are objectively evil rapists.

[–]1arakouzo19 points20 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

In part, this whole issue stems from the race to bring everyone down to the lowest common denominator.

Police used to show up at KKK rallies to protect them and ensure their right to free speech, while political liberals who absolutely loathed them said great lines like "I disagree with your idea and think it's disgusting, but I will fight and die for your right to speak it." I don't like the Klan, myself, but I sure like that idea of free speech for all.

But today, offended people don't just want to silence things that offend them. They literally feel attacked and harmed by the things that offend them. They feel fearful when you say it. If you say something offensive to a modern left-wing feel-good junkie, that person will literally be unable to function at work the rest of the day and will need to schedule an appoint with his or her therapist to work through it.

In their minds, offensive speech is, very literally, a harmful attack. The speech, itself, is the attack. Not what you represent, not your ideas, not who you'll incite or inspire. The speech, itself, is the attack that can do harm. Therefore, the speech, itself, must be silenced.

Taken to the extreme, you get our modern day, where the 99.999% majority are expected to change their business practices, their internet use, and even their very language, to avoid offending (e.g., attacking) the 0.001%. And every day, the rules change because someone else was offended by something that was just fine to say yesterday, so we continue to be demanded to change our language and our practices. It's a race toward the lowest common denominator.

[–]collegeguy11515 points16 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

People are not individuals anymore, they are completely defined by their political beliefs. So when you disagree with them politically they feel like you are attacking them.

[–]1arakouzo5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

True. And that's a two-fold problem.

Because someone identifies by their beliefs and those beliefs become who they are, this makes speech against their ideas (or in support of ideas they don't like) into an attack against their person. Which makes them feel bad, and in our feel-good, anti-depressant, see-your-therapist culture, you're not supposed to feel bad ever. So if you make someone feel bad, their psyche is literally harmed. Their mental health worsens. They feel afraid, anxious, depressed, and have trouble functioning. They need a therapist and drugs to make it through the day because they feel like the world is falling apart on account of people like you being allowed to exist.

On the other side, because they identify by their beliefs on issues, they believe the same to be true of you. You are nothing more than the sum of the terrible ideas you hold that they hate. Therefore, if you have those bad ideas, they aren't just bad ideas. You are a bad person in your core. You are not made up of the same good ideas that they are. You are made up of bad and harmful ideas within the very core of your being, so you are less than human. That means it is not only okay, but morally just to get you fired, harass your wife until she divorces you, vandalize your home, and even harm you.

[–]Huxleys_Island_Dude0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

IDK dudes maybe we should not upvote the posts that say bitches are only good for sex lol. But yea censorship is not chill

[–]RedKingRising-5 points-4 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

The point of reddit is to make money. Reddit is a business and just like any business they can do what they want. If you ran a business you'd know. Not every customer is an ideal customer for your business model. It's only censorship when the government stops you from saying what you want. Let's be rational.

[–]collegeguy11517 points18 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

It's only censorship when the government stops you from saying what you want

You can play word games and define censorship however you want, the point is that suppression of ideas is bad.

[–]1arakouzo5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

The concept isn't "Reddit can't do this because it's wrong!"

The concept is that Reddit's stated purpose for doing what it does is to control the spread of certain ideas, make the website more palatable to other users, and get people who run certain forums to change their behavior thus reducing the amount of offensive content in society.

But instead, the ideas spread to other websites, the behaviors don't change, and since those other websites aren't censored more people can be offended.

Now sure, Reddit's just making itself more sanitized for ad dollars and saying the reasons it does stuff is righteousness, but that's a little egg on Reddit's face for pretending a reason then failing at the pretend reason.

[–]RedKingRising5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I mean, that's business and dating. Nobody tells the truth. They just do what's in their best interests and say whatever they have to say to make it ok. That's the way of the world.

[–]OrtaMesafe1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Let's be rational

sir do you know where you are

[–]TRP VanguardWhisper1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

If you aren't paying, you aren't the customer. You are most likely the product.

Think for a moment. Who do you suppose reddit's customers are?

[–]BurningOrangeHeaven23 points24 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The chat function has a so called profanity filter now that only blocks certain racial terms.

This site is set up to encourage young and possibly underage girls to get naked and post their pics for shiny awards - posts that even go to the "popular" or "all" tabs which I'm sure other young users browse. You also have "raceplay" subs or subs that have other sexual content that's based putting one race over another, but if you think or say something they don't like they will censor or ban you. Just a real shit show in general.

[–]dopexile7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Hateful material is any idea that I don't agree with.

[–]1meerita21 points22 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

This is why I’m programming a new forum. I’m tired of this censorship

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 26 points27 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]Huxleys_Island_Dude0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

lol dudes trying to reinvent a wheel

[–]aamour10 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe he meant in general and not just for this sub

[–]UltimaterializerX22 points23 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Leftists: “If you don’t like the platform, go make your own platform.”

Also leftists: “How dare you make your own platform!”

[–]Tongue376 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Leftists pretty much only want to hear their own voice. Everyone else's needs to be censored completely. Leftists feel very threatened when someone speaks the brutal truth and think that person must be muted.

[–]AlterAeonos1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I was literally just banned on /exredpill for sharing my own personal experiences with women. That's how I know they're full of shit over there. They also spread lies about what redpill actually is. Saying that we are about continuing to pursue women who aren't interested and other bullshit.

I'm not left wing or right wing as I don't really believe in any of that shit but those leftists are straight up retards. Anything that could potentially throw a wrench into their spokes they'll try to silence you for it or do their best to make you seem crazy.

Dude over there took what I said and "rewrote" it in a highly exaggerated manner that tried to make what I posted seem totally retarded and irrelevant. Anyone with half a brain cell would call him an idiot but it really is just an echo chamber over there. I guess my experiences with women are offensive to their propaganda against redpills and needed to be silenced. All I said was that the same girls they're talking about were trying to bang guys like me on the side, although I worded it much more indirectly. Mentioned my experiences with friends girlfriend's, all of which I turned down because I'm a bro and all that.

Oh well, fuckem. The people over there will probably get cheated on and be happy sucking another guy's cum out of their girl's mouths 🤷‍♂️

[–]DerekMorganBAU13 points14 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

There's always going to be different "spheres" of the internet that exists. And some spheres overlap. I've seen where anime geeks were on one side, hip-hop heads and the "hood" culture were on another, but then somehow the two began to overlap. So now we got asians and geeks using the word "nigga" as a term of endearment for one another.

Anyways my point is that different spheres exist and they can never be censored, because the internet is infinitely vast. The KKK have their own sphere, and that's their right, because saying they don't have a right to congregate means that ultimately nobody does.

Shit whatever happened to, "I don't agree with what you say but I'll defend to the death your right to say it."

Well nowadays everything is about money, traffic, revenue and ad space. If Reddit could gurantee itself as the only internet forum, it would. Happily. They wouldn't be interested in hearing the other side. They'll pretend like they don't exist.

Then some middle class kids get shot up in a school and now we're forced to talk about what's been ignored for years. No, this didn't "come out of nowhere," and No, this didn't and won't stop unless some people feel as if they can be heard.

That's why the black community is so apathetic to change in the hood. Nobody cares about what happens.

A nigga dies in the streets? Won't even make the local news. A white girl is kidnapped? National News.

"Either they don't know, don't show, or they really don't care."

Society has a knack for burying their faces in the dirt and staying within their comfort zones. And now ideas are starting to be monetized. "If you want to discuss your favorite topics, it can only be done so safely here [because we have a monopoly]"

Everyone can see through it.

[–]Tongue375 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Ehh but if a black person is beaten or shot by police, that's all the mainstream media shows for months on end. We all know who Geirge Floyd or Jacob Blaje is yet bring up Tony Timpa or Daniel Shaver abd people are like "who?!".. So you can't say msm doesn't care about blacks, they just care about specific black victims that can push their agenda

[–]yung_thrombosis10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

i was already afraid of the internet splintering and becoming heavily factionalized but since big tech and social media loves to police and censor, making right wing alternatives is the only choice.

they made their own bed

[–][deleted]  (4 children) | Copy Link

[removed]

[–]Tongue372 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

And let me guess, the evidence that points to Fuentes being a white supremacist is nada? Lol I mean, the leftists have branded Denis Prager as a racist white supremacist 😂😂 .thats just hilarious but leftists entire belief system comes down to "if you don't believe everything I do you are racist and/or sexist" ..ridiculous

[–]SalporinRP1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

No Nick Fuentes is actually a white supremacist and a scumbag loser.

That being said, I'm against any type of censorship.

[–]slutmagazine0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

apparently the comments are being auto removed?

[–]kkikuyu4 points5 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

My question is why haven’t they taken down the misandrist subreddits like r/ femaledatingstrategies? Those women on there are the most entitled self righteous hateful bitter hags I’ve interacted with on the internet.

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 4 points5 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

You know the reason. Tacit endorsement.

[–]kkikuyu4 points5 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Have you ever taken the time to read their posts? I’ve never read so much hate on Reddit in my life. You have bitter most likely ugly women who work minimum wage jobs calling men who can’t live up to their princess expectations “scrotes” and LVMs. What have they ever accomplished in their lives for them to do that?

[–][deleted]  (3 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]BrownGummyBear1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

What a cesspool that sub (FDS) is holy shit. They have a post (it’s just a meme with trying to label men with all our toxic attributes). Some of the replies:

“men are more likely to be raped by other men than being falsely accused of rape”

“Men don’t get raped by women, they get raped by other men!”

Also, most of their posts seem to be low effort memes and shit. Not truly a “strategy” sub it seems

[–]kkikuyu1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Funny thing is that men raped by other men outnumbered male on female rapes in America a couple of years back due to the correctional facilities.

[–]N9nos881 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Disgusting subreddit. That one does not need to be quarantined, it need to be vaccinated.

[–]TheRedPillKing29 points30 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

I know I am going to get downvoted to hell but I don't give a shit.

The main problem of this sub is the hatred towards women because they don't understand women. In every post, there is some kid who writes something like "woman are shit", "whores", etc. They do not realise that most of what a woman does is based on hypergamy. One guy gets cheated on - half the comments is about the girl being shit. Only one or two comments are about hypergamy and advice for the dude.

Read the ECs comments on all the posts. They never say shit about women. Why? Because they understand women.

[–]monadyne46 points47 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

"women are shit", "whores", etc., is an understandable phase for someone to go through when they first realize that the creatures they had been taught to believe were special princesses aren't that at all. Learning something monumental doesn't occur in one quantum bump. "Aah! I just read a couple of posts in the sidebar. So, 'all women are like that', eh? 'Alpha fux and beta bux"? Who woulda guessed! Okay... got it!"

This woman-hating phase is something some men -- not just "kids" but grown men, too, -- go through when a cherished and long-held belief system lies in pieces at their feet. It may well be a step on the way to acceptance and understanding.

It illustrates why free speech is so important. If men weren't allowed to express hateful ideas, it doesn't give dialogue with mentors a chance to help them explore their crushed feelings so they can learn and move on.

[–]Returnofthemack33 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Solid point. It's better to have these men come here and get mentored by men who have figured it out vs concentrating in backwater incel forums that reinforce toxic mindsets and black pill ideologies

[–]RedKingRising8 points9 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Agreed, the anger phase exists.

Nobody is stopping free speech and censorship only exists when the government does it. A business can determine what they allow and won't allow according to their own needs. Reddit is a business and most people seem to think they have a right to say whatever they want on reddit. That's the true childish mentality. I don't understand grown men crying over Reddit doing what any business will do.

[–]SalporinRP2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Reddit is a business and most people seem to think they have a right to say whatever they want on reddit. That's the true childish mentality. I don't understand grown men crying over Reddit doing what any business will do.

The thing is, at some point we will have to reconcile with the fact that these massive social media platforms are essentially public forums. It's definitely a nuanced subject and I'm not sure there is a good solution.

[–]monadyne0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Nobody is stopping free speech and censorship only exists when the government does it. A business can determine what they allow and won't allow according to their own needs.

Somebody is stopping free speech -- and censorship exists -- when a moderator removes a comment because she doesn't agree with the politics it reflects. Because of the First Amendment such things are only protected against by law when the government attempts them, but free speech can be stopped, and censorship can exist, on a private platform.

[–]watstherate-5 points-4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Reddit is a private company that understandably doesn’t want to be associated with anger phased men who hate women.

[–]RedKingRising10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Honestly that's the anger phase and most men of value grow out of it. Men deserve to have a place to blow off steam and then grow up. Just like the stunted women-children on Female Dating Strategy. You're gonna see a lot of angry hurt people who need to vent. The point of the redpill is to move past the anger stage.

Also reddit is a business and buisness aren't required to protect free speech. If you come in my business being a jackass I will have you removed. Same rules apply. Some other shop might welcome jackasses with open arms. Not in my shop. I'm not mad at reddit for doing what's best for reddit, I'm mad at morons who thinks what is best for them SHOULD be best for reddit.

[–]Endorsed ContributorRPU_mike13 points14 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

The fuckboys that genuinely hate women simply cannot accept their feminine nature. These boys wish women would be more like men. Deep down, they just want to fuck other guys. Which is super gay.

[–]Proto_Sigma10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Reminds me of many a great comedy bit.

“ I would love to be gay, so I could enjoy fucking the gender I understand. ‘Gay’ used to mean happy. These people love fucking other men so much, they call it happy. I’ve been heterosexual my entire life, I wouldn’t call it happy, I’d call it a struggle at best. I’d love to be gay, but I could never fuck a man.

Because I could never fuck something that I respect.”

[–]Returnofthemack30 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

While I agree that invoking that type of langauge and mindset is ultimately toxic and unproductive, I think it's absurd to excuse utterly poor and immoral behavior via an appeal to nature. Where do you even draw the line? As humans, were capable of overcoming our base instincts and adhering to higher virtue, so that sort of argument seems like a justification of poor, path of least resistance behavior. I totally understand the anger and resentment men have, and I support moving past that because it's ultimately destructive, but I don't think it's unwarranted.

By appealing to nature and accepting shit like hypergamy, you're basically stating that women can't do better

[–]Huxleys_Island_Dude0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

100% agree. But at same time who the fuck wants to police this shit. All of the true internalized RP bros leave, because once you get the sidebar its just an unproductive waste of time. So the users who are left are 80% anger phase that jerk eachother's hateful comments and we just hope they eventually grow out of it.

[–]AutoModerator[M] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Visit our new off-site forum: Forums.red

Browse our tribes and forums, or create your own today on https://www.trp.red free!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]KurkTheMagnificent2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

There is no such thing as hate speech. This and other labels are copouts for those who cannot tolerate/address what's being said.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

There never was such a thing as free speech in physical form. There has only been the idea, the philosophy, the potential for such a thing.

The moment humanity started banding together someone started making rules.

The moment humanity started having free rational thought, someone was losing control and/or money.

Unless you are at the top, you are merely cannon fodder for those that are.

Sure, you can say what you want **at your own risk.

Sure, you have freedom of choice, to pick the color of your car.

Sure, you can think what ever you want while the drugs they pump into your food, water, veins, etc, take a break.

Freedom is an illusion. Nothing is free.

[–]Rodent95 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Aw, little Aussie girl Maddy King thinks she’s saving the world, one deluded feminist article at a time.

[–]RatingsOutOfTen1 point2 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

So what are the alternatives to Reddit?

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 5 points6 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

The article all but spells it out. It's attached to every post they said.

https://www.forums.red and https://www.trp.red

Welcome to the future :)

[–]mikrodizels1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

AFAIK, the forums will activate only if this sub gets actually taken down and right now only archives the threads and is locked, or has it already started being used and branched out different treads and users?

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I have officially unlocked the backup forums. However, I suspect you'll only see critical mass on the new forums if/when we shutter on reddit.

[–]slutmagazine0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm still learning how to use it. Any tips?

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Think of trp.red as a twitter clone with groups (tribes), and forums.red as a reddit clone.

[–]CharlieDowncast1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Damn....is this for real? All the more proof that we're living in a gynecentric society....fuck man.

[–]drv120213 points4 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

When people are trying to shut you up, you know you are saying something right and truthful.

[–]watstherate6 points7 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Not necessarily. If I walk into Walmart screaming “gas the jews” and they ask me to leave, am I saying something right?

[–]SoulRedemption0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

I think you are having a misunderstanding of free speech and consequences

[–]watstherate1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Free speech protects you from the government. Not Walmart or reddit

[–]SoulRedemption1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Free speech does not "protect" you from the government. Not the free speech you are being told. It's more of a legality as opposed to being protected from the government. They will still fuck you over. Consequences may be inevitable with the fake free speech being sold.

[–]watstherate0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

If someone came onto theredpill and started saying red pill was wrong he would get banned. By your logic is he now right?

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

If you post cat pictures in a dog forum, they tell you to go to the cat forum (or make one if it doesn't exist).

If you come to /r/theredpill to be off topic, you will be removed.

But we're not making an argument that thebluepill shouldn't exist.

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Men's rights or red pills might want to consider doing the same.

The article was about how we have a new off-reddit site. trp.red and forums.red

[–]Returnofthemack30 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Imagine that, censorship doesn't work

[–]sarcastic_charisma0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy Link

You know is this app comes down us this sub, parler is a possible choice imo.

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 2 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Parler is converged and a honey pot. Requires phone numbers. No legitimate reason for that. Do not trust. https://www.newsweek.com/parler-reportedly-backed-mercers-same-family-that-funded-cambridge-analytica-1547519

[–]sarcastic_charisma0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Huh? I'm not understanding ? I like parler cause its uncensored

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

They require a cell phone number

[–]Gackt0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

loool what were they thinking

[–]Gackt0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Btw if you got someone in Colombia they can get you anonymous phone numbers for $2.

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]sarcastic_charisma0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Ty bro bro

[–]tacosattack0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Dont you guys think quarantine is a good thing? We get to carry on as normal, while being kept out of the spotlight. I reckon the fact this board hasnt been outright banned in this political environment shows that someone at Reddit likes us. Meanwhile they've taken steps to keep their financial interests happy. Win win

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

How can they target TRP like that when things like FDS exist?

[–]redjamax0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

When I say "you"... I mean that in a sense of a general audience... it is not directed at any individual.

Here's the thing... Do you "Own" any part of Reddit?

The "Internet" is something that cannot be regulated... BUT, the Service and the Platforms are OWNED by "somebody", or "some group of people".

Think of the Internet as the Streets. These are owned collectively by the entire population by way of paying taxes.

And think of your car as the platform. (such as Reddit, or Facebook... etc) These things are owned by Individuals, or groups of Individuals. (they are businesses)

You can allow whom ever you choose to ride in your car with you... but that does not give them permission to spray paint your car with "I want big black cock jizz on my face".

The fact is... Reddit and Facebook can tell you to fuck off, close your account, and delete your posts All Day Long... Cause they fucking own it... Not you.

[–]Geep17780 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Censoring free speech and using the main stream media in conjunction with social media, is the tactic those in power, are using to bring about their agendas. Social media has given voices to so many different ideas and made some louder than they ever would’ve been and it’s a threat to this agenda of tptb’s future planned reality. So what they’ve done is turn these tools against us and the new strategy of censorship is their last ditch effort at putting a muzzle on those individuals that don’t like what’s in store going forward. The genie is out of the bottle and they’re only hope is to drown out the opposition’s thru shadow bans, censorship, and corporate ownership of all the social apps in order to police them. The people too fragile to hear an alternative idea to their own are completely and hopelessly brainwashed due to being un able to escape their personal echo chambers. What I mean Is the growing number of smart phone addicted people that rarely have any contact w an opposing idea or persons that may because they’re unaware that these ideas even exist anymore. All their news is of the same political slant. All their social media profiles are of friends that agree or hobbies tailored to specifically them. Women especially never come across anything other than simps being nice hoping for a chance to get laid and especially online! If everyone always agrees with you, when that 1 who doesn’t shows up, it shocks these mental midgets so much that it must not be them w the problem and you must be a racist, entitled, etc... add the narcissistic element to many of these people and then they actually attack any person who dares to disagree with their superior viewpoints on reality. How dare you?! Lol everyone on .. insert platform.. likes my posts and tells me how smart I am. And that folks is how it’s been done and how you control minds. The more data we fed the beast the easier it was to tailor our consumptions to fit the mainstream narratives. Unless you’re old enough to know how the world used to be, have a family to instill a value system, or read some books to acquire knowledge then you fall into the herd of group think.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2021. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter