~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
[deleted]
[–]politeAndLevelHed 51 points52 points53 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
in reality both sexes are scumbags morally
This is the truth.
Look you have guys and girls who care. They care about who they hurt and how they affect others. They are a lot more cautious in who they date because they don't want to be used.
But you've also got guys and girls who only care about one thing: feeling good - and it doesn't matter one little bit how that personal good feeling is achieved.
[–]MrCongeniality1 29 points30 points31 points 5 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link
There are circumstances where this kind of "accident" is way more likely to happen:
- She is post-wall
- She already has a kid
- Your SMV is significantly higher than hers
- All her friends are getting married or having kids
- She demonstrates other extreme neediness or BPD characteristics
You are less likely to encounter these scenarios if you are gaming women in their prime years.
You have been warned, gentlemen.
[–]LandoChronus 14 points15 points16 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Some of us have been chilled though too.
[–]Pestilence1911 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Women that already have a child are super-fertile for the months/years after.
Science.
[–]MrCongeniality1 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Citation? I've never heard this before and am curious.
[–]Pestilence1911 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Fertility after childbirth studies?,
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
We only have one form of birth control
Two, really. Now that I'm aging through my 30s, I'm contemplating whether I really ever want to have children, and vasectomy is looking better and better as a birth control option. And even so, my understanding is that after a vasectomy, it's still possible to have children if desired later, either by a reversal or by IVF. In other words, it's still possible; it's just more work. I should probably add that health care is relatively cheap where I live, so that does work in the favour of that option....
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Same boat. It's generally reversible, and easier for men than women to reverse IIRC. Guys at work who've got it say it's no major deal, just ball pain - most came back to work the next day. Costs a couple of hundred at the most in my country.
[–]10211799107 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
DM me when you decide to get it. I have good advice to avoid complications. If youre single and unsure, store your sperm. Storage fee is equivalent to one month of child support.
[–]BurnoutRS 17 points18 points19 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I've modified a flamethrower and attached it to my penis so all ejaculate has to pass through the pilot flame upon exiting my dick.
[–]I_am_Groot69 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
where did you buy it? I want one of those.
[–][deleted] 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]PMmepicsofyourtits 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That’s been “Soon” for a while though.
[–]yomo86 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This will never materialize. Men would get it like getting braces de facto killing the birth rate in any country.
[–]CowboyEpicurus 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago* (9 children) | Copy Link
When my ex and I first started having sex, she said that she was “Too young and career oriented to have a child.”
I think at that moment she was speaking in good faith. That is, she believed in what she was saying and had a legitimate vision of her immediate future that did not involve having children.
As the relationship grew we became closer and then she started revealing to me her ideas of wanting to become pregnant. This did not appeal me or even come as a surprise because I have seen it before and understand that in some sense, young women in heat (ages 18-30) are in the same relation to becoming pregnant as I am, as a man in the same age range, to spreading my seed. So she isn’t crazy, but that’s what her limbic system is promoting.
A simile might help to explain this analogy, a woman in heat observes pregnancy like a cat outside a bird cage. A motive of instinct compels her behavior.
At the same time however, what I saw was a contradiction between her instinct and what she had previously told me. I don’t think the “career-woman with no children” is something totally good. The notion of responsibility and goodness today is often associated with economic productivity. My preference towards the good is independent of that, so I disagree.
Whenever I hear a young woman say, “I can’t have children [yet], because of...” I keep in mind that there is nothing preventing her from contradicting that statement with her actions. Even though she has passed the pre-selection phase by proving to be “not crazy” she still is subject to her instinctual drives, hence AWALT.
I believe the best way to combat this trap is to help her make sense of the tension she feels between two different imperatives. If she is ambitious and career oriented, you need to let her know that it may not be possible to have a powerful career and at the same time raise a child. Both careers and children require time, energy, money, and a lot of attention. Is this something she can legitimately afford to do?
In the end, don’t rely on her communicating that she has ideas of becoming pregnant with your seed. Assume she thinks about it from the start and, if you don’t want a child, use protection. Make sure you have empirical proof that sufficient measures are being taken to prevent unwanted pregnancy.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
It is possible to do both, but you need to be quite wealthy already so you can pay for other to take care of most of the chores so you can both spend time on your career and spend quality time with your childs. But that would require a significant amounf of money so likely need to wait until you are a bit older too and maybe get a smaller house/flat/car at least in the begining to pay for that.
[–]WholesomeAwesome -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
or not being a complete utter imbecile women and choose to have an uninterrupted family life and career instead.
Now I leave you sprawling NPCs to figure out this enigma in the next enigma book.
hint: one of them comes first
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link
The result you get out of your career is a function of luck, how smart you are and the time invested. You can only action on the time and how well you spend it. This is not only direct work but social networks, business trips around the world, going to conferences, learning new things...
Anything that impact negatively the time you can devote to work is an handicap. There no ways around it.
Even if you give a headstart to your career, the day you stop investing as much as others is they day you fall behind.
That one of the reason given for the wage difference between men and women. Women tend to care more for the familly, less for the work and the time we can spend on anything on a given day is limited.
If both adults on the family prioritize their career they'll not even be able to stay together because soon the best next job to take will be in different cities. And to have a child in theses conditions is only doable if somebody else is taking care of most things for you. Sending back and both the child to school, making the diner, discussing with the professors, helping the child to do his homework, accompagnating him to his music or sport activities, taking day of to bring him to the doctor when he is ill and all the rest.
[–]WholesomeAwesome 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Are you saying working 35 years of your life is insufficient for a career? fuck off
get the fuck out of here. do the math or don't we're done.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
The day you get a family and spend time on it, you growth rate will slow. And then it is like compound interrest.
Somebody that take 10 years for his career and then 30 years sharing with familly has far far less possibilities than somebody that focus 40 years on his career alone.
Or maybe you are advocating the woman divorse after 5 years and let her child to her ex husband and don't even take care of them anymore ?
If for your pursuining a career is just managing to get the avarage salary that other people in your category get, then fine, sure. Otherwise...
[–]WholesomeAwesome 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
lol you're such an insufarable idiot.
The woman has the career after the children. The day where she gets a family and spends time on it never comes, because the family is before, not after.
Are you saying it's better to have a family in the middle of it? You're not getting any advantage, you're only losing efficiency.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
Nowadays the education of a child is about 20-25 years. So either her carreer will be short as she will start at 40 or 45 years old or she will have to make concession for the familly. That just how it is.
Concrete example 1: I know some woman, she change location every 6 months by contract, each time the salary increase like 30%. Each time the next location can be anywhere on hearth. This is extremely great for a carreer, but impossible to attends a child needs even a teenager at the same time. The day she stop doing that they are no more interrested in her.
Concrete example 2: My employer often open new offices over the world and look for experienced people to go there, again anywhere in the world. If you accept it, you get a big boost in salary, recognition and evolution. You may change location every 2-3 years. Even when working at theses locations, you may be asked to spends months or weeks abroad. Again this isn't nice when you have childs. If you do them first, either you make their life miserable or you refuse the opportunity.
Concrete example 3: There a big challenging project with tight deadlines. My boss is looking for people that can focus fully on it, potentially working more like 10-12 hours a day than 8. At the end of that 6 month period, you get a promotion and significant raise if project is a success. But you have to cope with the workload. Can you ensure to make work first priority for 6 months AND still provide for nice family env? I don't think so. Even if your child is already 10 years old. In my team I was the only guy that accepted to it and got the promotion and raise at the end.
Concrete example 4: You have to know everybody and network with your boss, clients and colleagues. Can you take the time to have dinner, barbecues in the evening and weekend instead of attending to your familly ? If you can't take that time, the promotion will not be for you. That just how it is.
And all of that is not even counting that if you did it slow at the begining or not at al to attend to familly first, you didn't really evolve. You company/management/employer doesn't see you as high potential and isn't interrested to invest in you. Even if you change job, you have nothing outstanding to show but you are already old. Being late by 5-10 years. If you didn't work at all, people think you diploma lost his value and don't want to take the risk.
[–]PMmepicsofyourtits 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It’s not that she can’t have children, she just doesn’t Feel like it at the moment.
[–]Thunderbird93 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
The ultimate answer to this is surrogacy. Lock down full custody of your kid by simply paying a woman to give birth. You can then go back to spinning plates while having your genes passed down. Its the ultimate RP win
[–]throwaway-aa2 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
2 major problems with your comment
In western countries often both member of the couple work so the child has still to be taken care for 40 hours a week when you and your partner work.
Still I agree that a child is an enormous amount of work and that sharing the workload help.
Even if the child get his 2 parents if they both work, they all are tired at the end of day and can't really enjoy the most of their childs.
On the contrary if you are quite wealthy, you can pay for somebody to take care of all the cores that life put on you and in that case it is much easier even if you are alone. Because basically you don't have to cook when at home, you don't have to take your child to school and take them back and so on so you are far less stressed and tired. On top you and your partner if you have one can still go out alone when you want and still benefit of a fullfilling social life.
On top you can ensure your child get to know another language from childhood and maybe even get private courses on many subjects. Music, sports or school related subject without having to be the driver of all the outings.
[–]throwaway-aa2 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Eh. In western countries ________ (fill in the blank). The reality, is you can find women who don't take home a fat paycheck, or who work part time... many many women opt to work part time. I agree with the rest of your statements though, they make sense.
[–]Thunderbird93 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]okczq 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
If you make significantly more money than her, never, ever, ever, ever, fuck a girl raw who does not have either an IUD or implant (hint both are 99.9% effective and it's fairly easy for you to verify they are in place).
It's just waaaaaaaaay too risky.
Condoms aren't the best solution either. Averaging 2x a week you've got about a 10% chance of pregnancy each year. That's pretty damn high for 18 years of CS.
[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Just a friendly reminder that as TRP has been quarantined, we have developed backup sites: https://www.trp.red and our full post archive (and future forums) https://www.forums.red/i/TheRedPill. Don't forget to register on TRP.RED and reserve your reddit name today. Forums.Red is currently locked but will be opened soon.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
[–]cheapcum 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Amateur asking amateur question, can someone elaborate on ‘Rick Ross voice’?
[–]BewareTheOldMan 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It's a direct reference to a phrase/wording to a particular person used to indicate added or literal emphasis...or sometimes as a basic parody to entice others to pay attention to a more serious statement while using a semi-comical voice/voiceover.
Example:
In my old man voice (and sounding like an actual old man) : "Once upon time a long, long time ago - men could expect to get a virgin for a wife. Nowadays things are different though..."
[–]andreas-mgtow 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Solid advice. Unfortunately, the most commonly available method for men has a failure rate close to 20% when perfectly used. Let that sink in. Failure rate is 1 in 5.
I always CIM/COF/COB for that reason. Yes, a little paranoid, but I don't play Russian Roulette.
Vasectomy + sperm storage = freedom.
[–]markinsinz7 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
But bareback feels so good
© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]politeAndLevelHed 51 points52 points53 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]MrCongeniality1 29 points30 points31 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]LandoChronus 14 points15 points16 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Pestilence1911 -1 points0 points1 point (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]MrCongeniality1 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Pestilence1911 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]10211799107 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BurnoutRS 17 points18 points19 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]I_am_Groot69 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]PMmepicsofyourtits 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]yomo86 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CowboyEpicurus 5 points6 points7 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]WholesomeAwesome -1 points0 points1 point (5 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]WholesomeAwesome 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]WholesomeAwesome 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PMmepicsofyourtits 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Thunderbird93 6 points7 points8 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]throwaway-aa2 7 points8 points9 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]throwaway-aa2 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Thunderbird93 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]okczq 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]cheapcum 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]BewareTheOldMan 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]andreas-mgtow 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]10211799107 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]markinsinz7 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link