~ archived since 2018 ~

The academic consensus on women’s lifetime partners and infidelity (tags: sociosexual orientation, promiscuous, promiscuity, sex history, sexual past, n-count, body count)

July 29, 2021
285 upvotes

The academic consensus is that one’s number of lifetime partners is a strong predictor of infidelity: “A truism in psychology is that the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior. This is no less true in the realm of sexual behavior. Indeed, one of the strongest predictors of marital infidelity is one’s number of prior sex partners. Deception about past sexual promiscuity would have inflicted greater costs, on average, on men than on women” (source). After interviewing thousands of women, Whisman and Snyder found a 7 to 13% increase in the chance of infidelity per additional partner depending on their mode of interview (source). Cherkas et al. investigated genetic influences on female infidelity and found that infidelity and promiscuity are both under moderate genetic influence and that “nearly half the genes impacting on infidelity also affect number of sexual partners.” (source). Hughes and Gallup determined “promiscuity is in fact a good predictor of infidelity. Indeed, promiscuity among females accounted for almost twice as much variance in infidelity (r2 = .45) as it did for males (r2 = .25)” (source). Pinto and Arantes found that sexual promiscuity is not only strongly related to sexual infidelity but that it is also strongly related to emotional infidelity (source). Barta and Keene wrote “[i]ndividuals exhibiting sexually permissive attitudes and those who have had a high number of past sexual relationships are more likely to engage in infidelity (Feldman & Cauffman, 1999). In a study of supposedly exclusive dating couples, it was found that individuals exhibiting an ‘unrestricted’ sociosexual orientation (SO) were significantly more likely to pursue extra-pair involvement (Seal, Agostinelli, & Hannett, 1994).” (source). An unrestricted sociosexual (promiscuous) orientation is strongly associated with infidelity due to a general lack of commitment as well as the desire for novel and varied experiences.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/TheRedPill.

/r/TheRedPill archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Title The academic consensus on women’s lifetime partners and infidelity (tags: sociosexual orientation, promiscuous, promiscuity, sex history, sexual past, n-count, body count)
Author BlindMaestro
Upvotes 285
Comments 99
Date July 29, 2021 6:26 PM UTC (1 year ago)
Subreddit /r/TheRedPill
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/the-academic-consensus-on-womens-lifetime-partners.795950
https://theredarchive.com/post/795950
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/ou36z4/the_academic_consensus_on_womens_lifetime/
Red Pill terms in post
Comments

[–]1KirthWGersen 215 points216 points  (34 children) | Copy Link

Great!

So choose accordingly.

You want a housewife and kids? Choose a woman who will make a good mother.

You want great sex? Choose a woman who will make a good lover.

You want to be loved?

Get a dog.

You want to avoid divorce rape? Don't get divorced in an English-speaking country.

Just don't try to try to turn a whore into a housewife or think your soulmate won't flip the switch when her feelings change.

[–]Odinwheb 60 points61 points  (18 children) | Copy Link

A dog would eat you provided it's been hungry for a long time, just learn that nobody in this world loves you and get over with it, the sooner the better.

[–]Qwesterly 88 points89 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

A dog would eat you provided it's been hungry for a long time

They actually find that many dogs will stand death watch on their owner, even to the point of eventually dying of thirst/hunger in their grief. Dogs are pretty darned loyal.

However, you're right, if hungry enough, a dog will fight to live, even if it means eating its owner. Humans are the same. We've eaten dogs and even eachother to stay alive in grim circumstances.

Cats, however, will start munching before your body even gets cold. They can be loving, but they are ever practical, and once you're dead, you're food.

And btw, I'm more of a cat person than a dog person, so it somewhat pains me to write this.

[–]BasilevsNihili 53 points54 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

And you would eat it and still love it. Get over the blue pill concept of love.

[–]Qwesterly 48 points49 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Get over the blue pill concept of love.

This took me a really long time in my life (many decades) to come to grips with, but once I did, it vastly improved my mental state, my life, and even my relationships with others, because I understood what each sex was predominantly capable of, and what each sex was not predominantly capable of.

Had a woman try to man-shame me once, saying "Have you ever HAD an epidural? NO, because you're a MAN."

My response to her was "We didn't have epidurals in the jungle. Squad mate told me to hold my hand over my gut until the medic got there and began returning fire to cover us, using my body as an elbow-brace for accuracy. Medic slid up to us like he was sliding into home plate, keeping flat for cover. He took one look and called for an Iroquois and just packed the wound and wrapped me. He jabbed me with shit-tons of something and it all went fuzzy. I saw slicks go overhead, looking for the trouble. Then the Huey came. I remember it was windy for a while, and I woke up in a lot of pain in a cot south of there, with the world's most gorgeous blonde smiling down at me. Not sure whether there was an epidural involved before I woke up, but I was sure happy to see her."

I don't know who that nurse is, but I have her in a special non-red-pill disney princess part of my mind, because that was the best wakeup I could have had. That smile just melted through all the confusion and fear and pain. I'm glad I never got to know her, so she can stay perfect in my mind.

[–]LandoChronus 13 points14 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I really, really try not to get a revenge boner or whatever you may call this, but FUCK YES.

[–]BasilevsNihili 11 points12 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Interesting story, glad to hear you overcame it. She perfectly fulfilled a woman's role which was easing your mind and troubles the way no man could. Chicks today think they are 'supportive' because they can suck a dick, but they can't shut up their drama.

[–]ihaphleas 13 points14 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Awesome reply.

I can love my woman, hell two or three, I can love my son, I can love my dog.

But this doesn't mean that I'm going to sacrifice my life for them.

It means I enjoy spending time with them, and that I want the good for them.

I may even *enjoy* making smallish "sacrifices" for them --- playing a game my son likes, instead of reading, for example. But I do these things to the point that we both enjoy them ... no more.

You are in charge of living your life in a way that you feel good .... you can't expect to sacrifice parts of yourself and have it repaid later.

Consider the dog. Is that huge vet bill really going to be a sacrifice? Your dog certainly isn't going to exactly pay you back ... he's not even going to love you any more than he does already. He simply doesn't understand the sacrifice you're making (and neither will women or children or anyone else, probably). Now, you can pay it and the dog will continue to love you (but not more) or you can get another dog, which may or may not love you the same .... I'm not saying that's an easy choice and I'm not saying there is a right and wrong choice.

What I'm saying is that you can't expect sacrifice to be paid back ... even less so from a woman.

[–]Artistic_Guest4386 1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

I mean, you should probably love your son unconditionally. Just because women are parasitic organisms that love opportunistically, doesn't mean we can't love our own kids idealistically.

[–]ihaphleas 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

I do love my son ... but I don't know what unconditionally means.

I'm sure you don't mean "give into his every whim" or "stay with his mother even if she is verbally abusive" or "tell him I love him and it's fine if he hits me" ... maybe you can explain.

[–]Artistic_Guest4386 3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

No, you raise him right, but you should also be willing to die for him.

Unless your kids are scumbags, you put them before yourself.

[–]ihaphleas 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Not sure where you get this "should" from.

Is there not a range between scumbag and a perfect human? There is also a range of how much you are willing to sacrifice, I think.

Will you buy no beer and put it all in your kids' college fund? Will you remove all joy from your life and live vicariously through your kids? Would you want to set that example for your kids?

You have what you feel is good for you to do for your children, I have what I think is good for mine ... and I will not teach him to sacrifice himself by sacrificing myself ... as my father sacrificed much of himself for me. Now I see my father old, broken and slightly bitter at the things not done.

[–]Artistic_Guest4386 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Dude I'm saying you should be willing to die for him, not pay his way or pander to him. He should face adversity, but your children are the ONE thing in existence you would die for....

Are you saying if it was a choice between you and him you'd let him die?

[–]ihaphleas 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm not sure. He's a beautiful kid .... but I also didn't choose to have him

[–]Odinwheb 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I couldn't give a damn about how a woman (or a dog un this case) loves me, I accept it as a truth but I don't want it.

[–]eaazzy_13 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This isn’t true. Some dogs will sit beside their dead owner until they starve to death. Cats are the ones that eat their dead owners.

[–]BetaCuckSimp 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Or find a higher power. Found mine on mushrooms if anyone needs a reference.

[–]Unforsaken_Dick 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Would a human do the same to the dog too?

[–]lord2528 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Depends. In a civilization? Probably not. Out in the wild starving? Well... You get the idea.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorRStonePT 2 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

you should really look into David Claires book, practical female psychology. You're referring to the madonna whore complex and guys who have it fuck their lives over quite regularily.

[–]1KirthWGersen 2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I love that book. It is truly one of the best. I too have often recommended it on here.

But this is not the Madonna-whore complex.

It is recognising and accepting women for who they are.

To use the categories in that book: if you pick a woman on the basis of the sexual pleasure and excitement she brings you (a high sex drive adventuress), don't except a peaceful home environment to raise four kids in (a low sex drive good girl). Some will have the right mix to be able to adapt; most won't.

The mistake all too many men make is to take a woman who is good for some purposes and believe (because they are loved up) that she will be good for all purposes.

Or they consider some women to be "bad" or "whores" simply because they enjoy their sexuality to the full. Such women are simply acting accordingly to their nature rather than some guy's personal views on sexual "morality".

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorRStonePT 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

He literally segmented girls into cheating whores and virgins using a single research paper that he didn't even read (past the abstract)

Bullshit yourself, thats your choice, but don't bullshit me

[–]1KirthWGersen 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I thought you were replying to me, not the OP!

[–]talesofchadwick 1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

I can never understand men who get married in the west. I mean perhaps if you're Brad Pitt and get divorced 300 million turns into 150 I mean you're pissed off but really you don't have a dramatic quality of life reduction.

But that is the life of a 0.01 percenter. At least the "bottom" 99.5% will have a rather drastic quality of life reduction after divorce.

I am sure there are benefits but they don't outweigh the risks at all.

[–]1KirthWGersen 2 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Personally, I will never marry again. It makes no sense for the kind of life I lead.

However, marriage is very different in different Western countries. Divorce-rape is simply not possible in many countries, since property remains completely seperate during and after marriage. Custody is 50-50 by default and child support is minimal (both partners are expected to find a job). This is the case in many European countries.

What a lot of people don't realise is that it is not where you get married that matters, but where you get divorced. A lot of American/British guys could lose nothing in divorce if they moved to a suitable country for 6 months before filing for divorce. Where the case is heard depends on the first party to file.

[–]talesofchadwick 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

I mean fair enough, if you can up root your life for that 6 months. Many people can't.

The courts are absolutely brutal to men where I live and prenups aren't worth the paper they are printed on.

Also I'm still looking for a reason WHY to get married in the first place at all.

[–]GabhaNua 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Also I'm still looking for a reason WHY to get married in the first place at all.

Much superior for children

[–]talesofchadwick 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I agree that with a good woman it is, but those don't seem to exist anymore. Also the level of financial destruction is so high you might as well just try and earn more money and get a surrogate.

Remember you're getting married to one of these useless trash bags. No one says they will be helpful raising the child AND at the drop of a hat can take your money AND child.

Seems lose lose to me.

[–]GabhaNua 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

There is plenty of good women in religious circles and also conservative secular families. Cant be hard to find though. I think religious have it easier as they are more organised.

[–]yomo86 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

After becoming an adept to TRP figuring out on how to get a good lover, a dog and not getting butt raped by divorce courts is the easy part. The hard part, at least for me, is finding a woman who you can have safely children with. Besides the emotional plane the cold hard fact which have to be in order for a mother/LTR to be are manifold. She should be from a financially independent background, rules curtailing her sexual exploits should be in place (religion, neighbors, mom and dad, whatever does the trick etc.), she should be responsible and still fertile.

[–]Andgelyo 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

One hand in the driver wheel and one hand the eject button as my boy would say….got a good girl, but I’m ready to walk away any time if she betrays me

[–]Slybooper13 51 points52 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Your are man , therefore you will always be on your own. No one cares about your feelings except your mother. And even that doesn’t matter. Life is not fair. Accept that you must be emotionally alone in this journey. Embrace it. Play women like video games. Play em till they aren’t fun anymore, then move on. If you do get a LTR, it should be a byproduct of knowing you don’t need one. I know, it’s contradictory in nature. But such is life.

[–]Arnoux 9 points10 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

No one cares about your feelings except your mother.

I’m not even sure about that. I don’t have a bad mother, but she has her own life as well. Yes she care more than other women but not way too much.

[–]xethreborn 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

And you're one of the lucky ones. A man is built upon himself.

[–]1i-am-the-prize 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, this is why one of the 50 shades of red maxim's is:

IM MAXIM #20: “Your mother is the only woman who will love you for you, rather than your power. Corollary: if your mother was a heartless narcissist, you have never known and shall never know a woman’s least conditional love.”

source: https://archive.is/RymYf

[–]Ivan_The_Reddish 136 points137 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

This just in: Scientists have determined that hoes gonna be hoes.

[–]PatternEast7185 75 points76 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

Leftists: TRUST THE SCIENCE!!!

Scientists: Bitchez aint shit..

[–]DareyFathom 38 points39 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

Leftists trust the science ONLY when it supports their narrative. Anything science related to gender or ethnicity is completely verboten to them.

[–]darkvinc 88 points89 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

If your facts don't agree with their feelings are they really facts ?

[–]BlindMaestro[S] 73 points74 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

I wrote it in response to this:

You could date a woman and she is absolutely everything you want but she’s slept with 40 people and it literally makes zero difference to who she actually is as person. Other than she’s had some fun, found out who she is and what she likes and what she doesn’t and will probably be a better partner and lover but you won’t date her because her number isn’t one you like? If you care about something so trivial then it’s sad. Same goes for women who only date for certain reasons. It’s using people for their traits rather than loving them as a person.

After replying with the above sources, they responded:

You went to all that effort and I didn’t open one of your links. Im sure I could go find sources that go against all that. Just stop already you’re making yourself look like a giant twat.

Remember most people lie about their number if asked. Which is probably something you shouldn’t be asking early on in a relationship anyway. It’ll be funny af if you end up marrying a girl who’s slept with 50 dudes and told you it was 5 😂😂

Which was to be expected. Usually, it’s accusations of “cherry-picking” without reading the links or “ulterior motives” without reading the links, when these are peer-reviewed articles put out by college professors and other academics affiliated with major universities. You can’t change the mind of a set ideologue, so it doesn’t matter. What matters is that research on the top is available to every man who can potentially benefit from it but simply lacks the means to find it.

[–]darkvinc 49 points50 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

The hamster at it's best : you're probably an ugly creep therefore your opinion doesn't really matter.

(using ''she'' for simplicity)

Here is the funny part : She's probably right in some way ( no offense ) because you see dudes who she thinks are attractive are not wasting their time trying to convince her what she thought all her life is wrong they are doing shit to make her feel GOOD and fuck her not make question her entire existence and realize that she'd been pissing her life away getting railed by random dudes and cannot pair bond correctly now.

So here is my tip : most people in this day and age are fucking delusional and couldn't care less about the truth as long as it fits their narrative. Know the truth act accordingly but let them fucking think they are the smart ones don't break the spell you'll just be the creep guy who's totally ''ruining their vibe''

[–]xethreborn 13 points14 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This guy fucks. Exactly how to handle it.

[–]1redhawkes 15 points16 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

On point, it's all about feelz. You don't argue with women, it's a waste of time. Your ego wants validation, so you argue to 'win'. Logic vs emotion. It's obvious from her response, she's attacking him, and once you fall in her frame, you lose.

The only answer is Amused Mastery. You've been there, seen it and have fun with it. People don't care about the truth, they only care how it makes them feel.

"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."

[–]neverendingplush 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Pretty smart , people dont really want the truth unless it vibes with what they want, and at best you'll like an asshole and a buzz kill and not the enlightened savior you think of yourself. Use the knowledge as u said to navigate the clown world ,but vibe with the folks

[–]PurpleLemon4de 38 points39 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

They all have to means to find it. They just absolutely refuse to believe any research that goes against what they’ve been socially conditioned to believe. They have a huge ego investment in their perceived way of how inter gender relations work so if you try changing their outlook they feel like they’re being attacked.

[–]BlindMaestro[S] 28 points29 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

No, they don’t. Most people don’t know how to access scholarly databases, and Google, which dominates with 92% of the search engine market share, filters its responses. Liberal left results are favored by its algorithm, so information on this topic is usually limited to opinion pieces written by ideologically-motivated women who don’t reference the existing literature.

There is a general disconnect between academia and the public. What bridges the gap—authors with various motives selecting what to cover, summing up findings with varying degrees of accuracy, and emphasizing (or outright fabricating) certain elements in line with those motives. Since this counters the current Geist, it’s not covered.

[–]PurpleLemon4de 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

They can find out easily though. Anyone can download and use another search engine/browser if they really want to find the truth. There are YouTube videos on this research that you can find relatively easily. It’s about how bad they want it.

[–]The-Wizard-of-Oz- 10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

There's no point in arguing with these people.

Their denial enforces their worldview and they cherish their worldview. Their very identity is built upon it.

[–]Ethman2k9 25 points26 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

So you can’t turn a hoe into a housewife. Glad science is finally catching up.

[–]nadolny7 53 points54 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Someone should cross post this on /science so we can see their rebuttals

[–]Ivan_The_Reddish 59 points60 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The rebuttal would be it being deleted by the mods.

[–]Former_Loser 13 points14 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

God I so wish this wasn't true, but I have no doubt that it is. Sad, really, since the old me would want to give these women a chance. The good news is having this information circulate will save men from heartbreak going forward.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorRStonePT 8 points9 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Girls lie, good luck with that.

They will fuck a bunch, then throw on a sun hat and a summer dress and make you wait and act sweet, just like those virgin girls you assume will be loyal and faithful forever (because thats really what you want, bubble wrapped life)

So while the article says a lot, it really says nothing, and the person reading this will generall think along the lines of:

I don't need to change myself, I'm great the way I am. The only way bad things will happen to me is if I don't find a girl with these 10 qualities of a high value woman!

You know some other, really good indicators that a girl will cheat or divorce? Having a friend who cheated or divorced. How ya gonna filter for a girl who 10 years in has a friend re entering her slut phase?

Hint: you can't.

The point isn't to shit all over this post, laugh at the tradcon ideals it masks, or to suggest you just ignore issues ... it's that the only factor you have control of is you. Sort that out. Which includes:

  1. Inability to deal with loss
  2. lack of abundance to replace value less women who break boundaries
  3. enough value that someone would have to be retarded to think about testing your loyalty
  4. shed your ego so your eyes can tell you whats going on, becuase your heart sees what it wants to see.

No where in any of that is a thot microscope and spreadsheet of female risk factors.

[–]AllocNeighley 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Just had one blow up my phone

"Sorry I'm no longer available"

She couldn't take the rejection and proceeded to block me. Lmao. I'll give it 3-5 days

[–]GulpAndCry 23 points24 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

people who like to fuck around... like to fuck around. no surprise. applies to men too yoi horny apes

[–]FrenCan16 16 points17 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

After interviewing thousands of women, Whisman and Snyder found a 7 to 13% increase in the chance of infidelity per additional partner

Damn haha that's high. Guess the girls on Tinder are gonna have a 100% chance of infidelity.

[–]PolukranosWordEater 25 points26 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

If anyone takes a woman that's been on tinder as a serious relationship possibility they need to be kicked in the balls.

[–]Nihat_A 12 points13 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Forget the tinder bro, now I don’t understand how western marriages function. In Europe these hoes start fucking since 15-16 yo and let’s say they try to get married late 20s in the worst case. And each additional partner 7 to 13% increase ? DAMN

[–]FrenCan16 6 points7 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Marriage in modern western society is a scam. Enjoy the time, money and freedom that most married men desperately want. OPT-OUT of the cruel and degrading system of marriage.

[–]supremelummox 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

How do you get children though?

[–]FrenCan16 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

What do you want me to say bro? You put the baby batter into the vagina and 9 months later you have a child if she doesn't decide to abort it.

[–]supremelummox -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I was wondering what's your take on children, given that you don't above marrying. To not have any, to have a monogamous family without marriage, or to have children from women you don't live with?

[–]pantryofdoom 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

You bring up a valid point- and the truth is that you either find a dependable woman to make a mother of your children, or you risk putting your seed into a degenerate skank who will likely divorce you and leave your kid to be raised by a string of her post-divorce hookups.

Western men made this bed in their society and often denigrate how traditional countries "poorly treat" their women, so I say that this is a problem that they deserve.

[–]ignatztempotypo 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Ummm, they're on tinder.

[–]omega_dawg93 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

male attention is their drug... they CRAVE it immensely: do NOT ever forget this. it's a good drug from men but an AWESOME drug from men they find attractive.

so, when young women figure out that giving up pussy will increase their level of male attention, they start using their pussy to get it... awa mouth, asshole, hands, tits, etc. they'll use anything to keep their 'drug' in good supply.

about these findings... they are misleading in a way in that most people think: "you can't turn a whore into a housewife." ok, cool... we've all heard that expression, but here's the problem: that girl that got all those cock miles wasn't necessarily looking for (just) cock... she was looking for attention.

so that 'innocent' looking girl you just married will hide her sexual past because women KNOW that it hurts a man's ego to know her pussy has been used as a shooting gallery. she hides her sexual history...

  1. to protect YOUR (male) ego.
  2. to protect her own feelings (she doesn't like to think of all that cum she collected from guys she didn't want... just wanted their attention).
  3. to project a sexual 'innocence' so you keep a positive image of her.

but here's what she won't hide: her DESIRE and lust for additional male attention. see Steph Curry's wife as an example. so that former slut... the one you just married probably won't cheat because she craves cock; she's likely happy with (just) yours. but if she lacks impulse control & emotional control, the right guy at the right time (very attractive/masculine male that she wants attention from) can trigger her craving for ATTENTION. after a few calls, texts, & boom... she's giving up pussy to keep his attention 'cumming.'

so fellas, it's NOT about her craving cock... it's about her craving attention and that could be from daddy issues, low self-esteem, psycho disorders, etc. ask more questions about her past life... not just her past sexual life.

[–]ColdStillNight 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

As the old saying goes, can't make a wife out of a hoe.

Keeping women from turning into sluts is probably the one good thing more conservative societies have done well.

The funniest thing is seeing older women (40+) complaining how they're single and how they deserve someone good. By allowing and pushing for a free-for-all-sex society, women have literally ruined their futures for when they're older.

No man wants used goods. No one wants a lock that opens for all keys.

[–]AutoModerator[M] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Visit our new off-site forum: Forums.red

Browse our tribes and forums, or create your own today on https://www.trp.red free!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]sabanMiles11 5 points6 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

Ehhh we already know this... this is red pill 101... not sure why we are posting about this

[–]Odinwheb 39 points40 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

Eh, why not add some "scientific" background? Might even convince some serial doubters; because even if you can confirm it for yourself it can be attributed to anecdotal evidence at best.

[–]sabanMiles11 -5 points-4 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

Many reasons: academia is left wing; the “science” is largely survey’s; the red pill is fundamentally existentialism and thus “objective studies” don’t matter as much as “how to act.” They are different domains. I can sit here and explain to women that height and muscles aren’t that important based on x study - it’s not going to alter their attraction to it. Same with thing with finding studies that women being overweight or having a lot of partners doesn’t matter - it does and you trying to make an objective scientific argument doesn’t alter gut instinct and attraction. It’s useless circle jerking

[–]bestmemerever 9 points10 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

but pretty much all related study confirms that height is even more important than we think

[–]BlindMaestro[S] 5 points6 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

it’s not going to alter their attraction to it.

And these studies explain why that is. Also, they’re attracted to height and strength for a reason, and it’s not a conscious one.

[–]sabanMiles11 -5 points-4 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

Lol 😂 k... it’s useless to keep regurgitating well known knowledge

[–]BlindMaestro[S] 2 points3 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Outside of here, it’s not well known.

[–]sabanMiles11 -3 points-2 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

That’s like saying outside of church, Jesus isn’t well known. You are literally preaching to a Choir

[–]lord2528 3 points4 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Dude, if you agree then agree. More good info out there is better than none. Where the fuck is this aggressiveness coming from?

[–]sabanMiles11 -2 points-1 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

I get that way after I fuck your mom

[–]lord2528 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

People keep saying that. But I bet you don't even know where I'm from. Why don't you keep those childish insults to yourself and we can have an actual discussion.

[–]Elicommand 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Hello Mr. Strawman, how be ye

[–]intelligentlemanager 2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Why are you larpers worried about infidelity?

No amount of bro science changes the fact that she is not yours, it is just your turn.

So act accordingly, ignore infidelity statistics, stop searching for blue pill 1950's cuckservative solutions and build yourself instead

[–]lord2528 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

More good info out there is better than none. If this can change 1 man's view and turn him redpill then it has done its job.

[–]leothebold 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Ie, be happy with a wife swap situation in which a few big dick alphas get the majority of women while most men are left begging tyrones leftovers

[–]Skrzymir 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Now ask yourself how many of the study participants were woke "feminists" who answered untruthfully because of a massive conflict of interests, and take into account what the synonyms of unfaithfulness are (you know, like... deception and dishonesty). The same could be assumed of the opposite side, but I highly doubt it'd be anywhere near as significant.

[–]CuntMonteCristo 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Great post! Well done!

[–]Turbokorpo 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

My gf has a body count of 7 at the age of 21. Should I ditch her ?

[–]ImAlmostCooler 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

You should do whatever you want dude

[–]Ejszaka 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Interesting.

I also found a study that said tatoos are non-significantly correlated to higher sexual activity, but still slighty are more active than non-tatooed women.

Best to test them early on to see if they are promiscuous or not, saves you a lot of time by not falling into the "halo effect" cognitive biais. She can be hot and look traditionnal, but an unfaithful slut who deserves nothing more than a loser with a McDonalds dead end job.

That's why they date low IQ idiots : for power and control. Higher IQ men can't be manipulated, or at least not as easily.

They want a loyal high value boyfriend after playing the field and riding the cock carousel and wasting their prime years on losers ? Good luck. That won't be me.

[–]GabhaNua 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Great argument to waiting till marriage

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2023. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter