FULL BLOG POST

A long but excellent read. Here are some poignant excerpts:

Women are ill suited to make decisions about their own lives, because in the ancestral environment they did not get to make such decisions.

Show me a marriage where the housework is equally and fairly shared ... and I will show you a marriage where the husband sleeps on the couch, and once in a week or so the wife’s lover drops in to bang her on the main bed, rough her up a bit, take her money, and leave a mess for the husband to clean up.

Tasmanian aboriginals would trade a good woman for a good hunting dog, at the ratio of one dog for one woman, and no one would think to consult either the dog or the woman.

Societies and social classes where the cooperate/cooperate equilibrium is enforced out reproduce and out invest societies that practice the defect/defect equilibrium, thus societies, and social classes in a defect/defect equilibrium disappear from history.

Wealthy societies with no-fault divorces have fertility rates so low they will disappear from history, while 3rd world countries continue to pump out armies of babies. The future belongs to the descendants of cooperate/cooperate societies.

In the ancestral environment, women were dangerously powerless, so natural selection made them always want to have more power, just as it made us always want to have more sugar, so that we are inclined to eat more sugar than is good for us, and women inclined to take more power than is good for them.

The reason Men’s Rights Activists are so angry and bitter is that they tried treating women as equals in their personal sexual lives, and, of course, suffered a total and complete disaster.

MRAs never graduate beyond the anger phase because they want men and women to be equal. Anger, for RedPillers, is just a phase that we leave behind when we put away the foolish ideological goal of equality.

Women want to wrap the man around their little finger, but they don’t want a man that they can wrap around their little finger. They want what they do not want, and they don’t want what they do want.

In 1912, marriage was already violently asymmetric in favor of women, in that the duties of the husband were legally enforceable and enforced, but the duties of the wife were not. Logically one would expect that this would lead to high demand for marriage by women and low demand by men, but since women are maladapted to a high status role, since they do not desire a relationship in which they have power, even though they contradictorily desire power within a relationship, it leads to low demand by both.

Today in 2015 when women have more power in marriage than ever before, fewer people are getting married. This is a huge problem for civilization of course, but women care nothing for civilization. If civilization collapses, women will happily go barefoot and pregnant for the Alpha warlord who fills the power vacuum.