~ archived since 2018 ~

The Sad, Sordid Cautionary Tale of Harvey Weinstein: Why Money Isn’t Enough

October 14, 2017
294 upvotes

The Sad, Sordid Cautionary Tale of Harvey Weinstein: Why Money Isn’t Enough

TL;DR: Fat, unattractive blue pill guy with Money but No Game winds up getting shredded for being a creep and probable rapist.

Why Money Isn’t Enough

So someone raised the topic of Harvey Weinstein over in ask TRP, so I thought I would address it. The Harve is not even remotely red pill. In fact, he's a liberal, blue pill predator1 who thought that as long as he said the "right things" and supported the "right candidates", then everything would be ok for him.

So how did this happen? First, you have to understand that Hollywood is an absolute cesspool, run by a bunch of perves, pedos, plus other assorted weirdos.2 Lots of dysfunction. It’s been that way there for DECADES. And yet, in that cesspool, Harvey Weinstein stood out as a Grade “A” Shitbag.

Where did the Harve go wrong? I am fond of saying that money is a “force multiplier” and it is useful as a tool, but only in the right hands. In other words there must be a force to be multiplied. Weingrabber was an obese, bumptious uggo with no self-control. If it had boobs, the Harve wanted a massage and a handjob from it – look for him to be portrayed by Mike Myers in the future biopic. The Harve liked to trade plum roles for young peaches. For all the complainers now, I’m sure there were plenty of gals who were only too happy to put on their cock jockey silks and ride the Harve’s pathetic chubbie to stardom.3 Indeed, of the women who is now alleging rape also admits to maintaining a consensual sexual relationship with him for 5 years after that. Of course, she (and others) bear no responsibility for their shitty life choices. If the Harve wanted a meeting in his room, it wasn’t because he gave a shit about a girl’s opinion on the Middle East situation or wanted to discuss Camus. It was because Shamu wanted a massage handy! And women took those meetings because they wanted to be rich and famous actresses, and, well, if you want to cross a bridge you have to pay the toll bang the troll. At least that’s how the Harve saw it. I have zero sympathy for the Harve, but not a ton for alleged naifs who thinks shit should be free to them because they're pretty.

Of course, Everybody Knew4 but Nobody Said Anything, because the Harve basically shit gold. So long as the Harve could make or break careers and was churning out Oscar-nominated films – “Sex, Lies, and Videotape”, “The Crying Game”, “Pulp Fiction”, “The English Patient”, “Shakespeare in Love”, “The King’s Speech” – it was “Let the good times roll!” And roll they did. Miramax’ films garnered over 300 Oscar nominations.

Had he ANY sense of savoir faire whatsoever, he’d have pre-qualified his women better, figured out who was down and who wasn’t - hint: don't force yourself on women who are not DTF with you - and would be happily nailing quality tail, and doling out rewards to his favored cock holsters to this day, instead of basically losing everything, becoming suicidal and jetting off to Arizona to have his libido exorcised. But no, it was “Me want pooosy! Me want cookie! Me want hand job! Me want pizza!” He had to go after everything in a skirt, because he was drunk on his own power, and as soon as that power dried up, the long knives came out for him. If you listen to the audio recording made by Ambra Battilana Gutierrez5 as part of an attempted sting with the NYC police, he comes off as a petulant, whiny little pussy beggar. His eventual fate is richly deserved.

Conclusion:

Don’t bang girls who do not want you to bang them.

Money, while a force multiplier, is not enough.

Identify the pool of women who are attracted to you, and draw plates, girlfriends, LTRs from that pool.

Looks, Money & Game, abideth these three, but the greatest of these is Game.

= = = = = = = = = =

1 See "Clinton, William J." Sort of ironic that he got busted over a zaftig stalker who was DTF but that's how it goes, I guess. His past was littered with women who were less willing, although there were certainly some fame-seekers and profiteers, also.

2 Google “Hollywood” and “Pedophiles”. Elijah Wood (whose parents kept him away from “those parties”) and Corey Feldman (whose parents didn’t) have had plenty to say about it.

3 Have you ever wondered about certain actresses? For me it was always Kirsten Dunst, who was last seen with a bunch of horrified Japanese people. No talent to speak of and dose ‘teefs. shudder I have no idea if she was one of the Harve’s fuck dolls, but it would explain a lot.

4 Except Judy Dench and Meryl Streep who are both trying to “Sgt. Schultz” it, but mostly because nobody has wanted to put his cock in either of them since the 1970s. Evidently even the Harve has standards.

5 She also managed to be at one of Silvio Burlusconi’s “bunga bunga” parties. What rotten luck this girl has!

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/TheRedPill.

/r/TheRedPill archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Title The Sad, Sordid Cautionary Tale of Harvey Weinstein: Why Money Isn’t Enough
Author VasiliyZaitzev
Upvotes 294
Comments 134
Date October 14, 2017 9:08 PM UTC (4 years ago)
Subreddit /r/TheRedPill
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/the-sad-sordid-cautionary-tale-of-harvey-weinstein.46540
https://theredarchive.com/post/46540
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/76es3p/the_sad_sordid_cautionary_tale_of_harvey/
Comments

[–]squarehead93218 points219 points  (17 children) | Copy Link

I find it hilarious that Weinstein's wife is only leaving him now. Harvey being a creep was one of the biggest open secrets in Hollywood. People have been joking about it for years. There's no way in hell she didn't know. He was rich and powerful, so he was still of value to her. Now that he's just a another ugly, fat guy with no job who's been outed as a perv to the whole world, he's only a liability to her. She dropped him like a hot potato

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 83 points84 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

So long as he was the goose who laid the golden eggs, lots of folks were willing to look the other way.

[–]anon35201 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

Harv gave his women power over him, and his stellar career is ruined for it.

Men, take notes and put it somewhere for review if you forget.

I find it interesting that all these nuggets of wisdom are found written, iterated and re-iterated in the Bible.

[–][deleted] 56 points57 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

She is the quintessential illustration of Briffaults Law and I'm sure that chubby loser thinks he can win her back

Haha like she ever loved him and not his wallet

[–]Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana43 points44 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Plausible deniability is an important concept of TRP.

His wife knew for sure but at least she could deny knowledge of it to the world while receiving the benefits of Weinstein's fame and fortune. Now she can't deny knowledge so she has to leave.

It's as predictable as a good chess move.

[–]hodltaco25 points26 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

She needed an excuse and jumped at the chance. She'll get a pay day regardless of the pre-nup. His Hollywood power is gone, he's useless to her.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 12 points13 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

I don't know how long they've been married, but in California, a pre-nup basically doesn't matter after 10 years. He may have managed things in other ways (trusts, etc.) but a pre-nup isn't going to save him in CA.

[–]1Original_Dankster35 points36 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Just crossed the 10 year threshold.

How convenient. I'd be surprised if she didn't nudge some female Hollywood counterparts to get the ball finally rolling on this one.

[–]hugaddiction4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

are you telling me girls plan things like this?! so typical that its predictable.

[–]1Original_Dankster5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Short answer:Yes.

Long answer, Yes. But might not be planned from the outset, it could be a plan developed after a time.

How I know: I spent a summer doing touring and gigging musician. Never met with success, I was a total flop. But while on tour I met a guy who had been big in the music biz at one point. He was in a band that was a one-hit wonder, and got royalties every time their song was played. At the time I met him, it was enough money for him to live off of, but he was by no means rich from it.

After his big hit and the band's success slowed down, he took the initial influx of money and went to university to educate himself as a professional, started a professional practice and built a second business.

He met a woman while in the band and riding high on success. She expected he would "make it big" and ride his coattails for success. She got pregnant, they had a kid, had a "happy" family. Whether her intent may have been to leave him and siphon his money away from the outset, that's not certain. But, with his professional (non-music) success and side business, and residuals from that one hit, she stayed for years because he was still pulling in dough.

Crossing the threshold for lifetime alimony became her goal. She stayed with him for like 16 years or something, and had a second kid to "renew" their relationship around that time (so she had a young kid to ride for child support for another 2 decades).

Anyways, he used some financial / legal strategy to get rid of his practice and side business, so that he had assets but little income, then ended up giving her five million bucks hard cash to go away.

My point is this: She might not have planned it from day one, but as time went on, options became presented to her and she took them.

Weinstein's wife may or may not have planned this from day one, but as the 10 year mark approached, she probably realized there's a juicy exit strategy presenting itself.

[–]WhorehouseVet11 points12 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

https://youtu.be/KCNvREKTnQc

Even Seth McFarlane was joking about it back in 2012.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor18 points19 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

A week ago if she left him she would have been treated like a whore and became an outcast to high society. Now she will be a hero among most of them.

Well, except the Clinton cartel, which appear to be big fans of rapists, including their vigorous defense of this one. She needs to avoid walking alone at night in the city. Accidents happen.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

She knows what is up. She was willing to put up with it as long as he was a money fountain. Now he is still probably rich. But he is now a money pool and the pool is gonna get a lot smaller as these lawsuits come in. Not only that but she had some level of prestige in being connected. Now that is gone.

So it is time to siphon off as much as possible and trade up.

[–]deville050 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

You've had it wrong. He was always fat and ugly to her but he was rich and powerful. Now he has lost his power. Women who marry powerful rich men like that have an understanding.. you do what you want as long as you don't bring shame and humiliation yo me. It's a business deal. She is 100% doing what's right. She has no choice but to distance herself from him otherwise she will be socially ostracised. She has to play it this way

[–]AncientMowa-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Ironically he is as close as she will ever come to “making it” in Hollywood

[–]DrinkMyPenis97 points98 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

Every single woman who stayed silent about Harvey for all this time, were essentially enablers who allowed the shitshow to continue so that nothing would compromise their chance at fame and money. Maybe they were some shade of "victim" before and during each Harvest. The second they decided that they were going to keep it on the DL to further their own self-interest, they became enablers, whores, and women who did jack fucking shit to protect any new starlets getting off the train into Hollywood.

And these are the people who think they can stare down their noses at the rest of us.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 79 points80 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

And these are the people who think they can stare down their noses at the rest of us.

Totally. Of course the cri de coeur from the Cathedral is now "Where were the MEN?! Why didn't the MEN speak up?!"

Because women are never responsible for their own predicaments.

[–]BigThickLongAndHard5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

BTW I love your unique writing style.

[–]denali4eva18 points19 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Every single woman who stayed silent about Harvey for all this time, were essentially enablers who allowed the shitshow to continue so that nothing would compromise their chance at fame and money.

Terry Crews said something about this. Google for his tweets about this. Crews, a massive black man and former NFL linebacker, was supposedly groped by a Hollywood male exec in front of Crews' wife. Crews decided not to speak out about it. Paraphrasing what he tweeted (pls someone correct me if I'm wrong): he said sometimes you wait until you gain enough power yourself to confront those perpetrators who are powerful Hollywood execs.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 24 points25 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Not all the pervs in Hollyweird are straight.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

A lot of them are trisexuals.

They will try anything. I remember dropping in unannounced on a friend who is/was small player in the industry. "Can I come in?" "Wait?!?!? Is that a girl you have in there?!?!" He begged me to keep it secret.

[–]saibot835 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Oh, this goes for guys as well but the narrative that's being spun is "poooor widdle defensewess women".

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Agree.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, he would surely get ostracized by the media for saying it, or just saying it before on twitter.

He is also just an enabler.

He is not a guy on minimum wage living from paycheck to paycheck.

[–]Modredpillschool11 points12 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Every single woman who stayed silent about Harvey for all this time, were essentially enablers who allowed the shitshow to continue so that nothing would compromise their chance at fame and money.

They're called prostitutes.

[–]yomo866 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

They 'came out' the second they knew an allegation would stick. First the ones who had run their course in the HW meet grinder over 30 and no chance of getting top roles anymore ie Rose McGowan.

Otherwise accusing the fat fuck of rape while he was in power could ruin your entire career as a woman with no other talent than that of a pretty face.

Now see, the unknown youngsters jump on the bandwagon, as being a rape victim of a successful guy gives you instant fame.

And right now with the hashtag of "metoo" the plebs can claim victim status and the attention that comes with it.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Or they are just shit actresses and should never have been there in the first place?

[–]Hjalmbere1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I saw Courtney Love of all people warn aspiring actresses of Harv. Go figure......

[–][deleted] 49 points50 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

The Gaystream media will associate that fat fuck with toxic masculinity and misogyny and by association.....us.

Yet we find him as deplorable as the starlets he raped. His weakness is revolting.

The cognitive dissonance they must employ trying to reconcile this fact will be awesome to see

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

In order not to dilute my message in the top-level post, I left out the role of the "Velvet Mafia" in Hollyweird.

[–]Modredpillschool7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

The Gaystream media will associate that fat fuck with toxic masculinity and misogyny and by association.....us.

Because most men are rich movie executives!

I think this narrative won't actually hurt men the way they think it will. Truth is, most men are not in a position to trade sex for a high-paying position.

But if the Hollywood elite start cannibalizing themselves, I'm all for it. Let's watch it burn.

[–]CQC34 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It seems to me that feminists think that all men experience masculinity and lifestyle the way top 10% men do. I'm not really even fond of that phrase either, top 10% man. I wouldn't look at Weinstein and think "top 10% man". There's no linear metric.

[–]yomo861 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Weinstein the racist did not even molest a person of color.

[–][deleted] 24 points25 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

All excellent points, boss.

The one place I'll push back a little is here:

bear no responsibility for their shitty life choices.

Agree on the responsibility part emphatically and entirely, but is it really a shitty life choice? Ride some gross sleazeball a couple times and end up famous with the bucks rolling in?

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor28 points29 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

is it really a shitty life choice?

If you want to whore yourself out for money and fame, no it isn't. Just at least be honest about your being a prostitute when the game is over. A lot of these women have very tarnished images now. I'd respect some of his more enthusiastic cock gobblers a lot more if they would just outright say, "Hey, would you hold your breath and jerk that little thing for 15 seconds if it made you a very rich star?" There might be public outrage, but fuckton of women will think to themselves, "I've starfished for my pathetic, fat beta Bradley for whole lot less."

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That would move the fucking needle.

I recently read Extreme Ownership by Jocko Willink. Required reading for feminists.... I wish.

Required reading for TRP should be Genology of Morals and Beyond Good & Evil.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 12 points13 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Agree on the responsibility part emphatically and entirely, but is it really a shitty life choice?

That's up to the individual. I am guessing plenty of women happily put in their cock jockey silks, as I said. There will be some, now who are going to pile on with "regret rape" and shit, but they guy is a complete and utter sleaze. Had he exercised some discretion and some self-control he would not be in the predicament that he is.

[–]1UPZ_34 points35 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

Were the women forced to do those things? As in he threatened to replace them even though they've secured the role? or were the women vying for the roles and he gave them an advantage if they accepted his conditions?

I think he is a scumbag and deserves whats coming to him... but women selling their integrity for fame and money, should they be also questioned? I mean if they were vying for roles and and did those things without a gun on their heads... I see that as a compromise/sacrifice and should be partially blamed for going through with it... again this is assuming they had an option to say no.

Just wondering.... I mean again, some of the actresses wanted to be selected for roles through a biased method.. and not merit, that method just happens to be disgusting and highly immoral.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 28 points29 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Were the women forced to do those things?

Based on the numbers involved, some of them probably were. I don't have a ton of sympathy for anyone involved, but yeah "Don't ruin your friendship with me for five minutes" does seem to carry an implicit threat. Bear in mind this was a guy who could have actors blackballed.

The one chick who later had a 5 year consensual relationship with him? She became a single mom (shitty life choice #1) she accepted financial help from him for a nanny or childcare (shitty life choice #2) and then carried on a sexual relationship with him because she felt "obligated" to (shitty life choice #3). In her case I'm not sure the Harve can be blamed for thinking he had an entirely consensual thing going on, although we don't have details of the first encounter.

Regarding the one with the wire she clearly does not want to enter his hotel room. He should have cut it off long before he did, but he does ultimately tell her to split.

[–]TheCeilingisGreen 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

I'm going to play devil's advocate. And this is in no way a defense of the guy. He obviously doesn't understand the word no. But could it be possible that he really just wanted her to sit down in the living room and watch TV for 5 mins while he showered? He groped her the day before but could it be that she was more receptive the day before and he is confused as to why all of a sudden she won't even enter a room with him? What was the nature of their relationship before this? She was wearing a wire. She has every incentive to make a scene and bait him into this behavior. Was she downstairs laughing it up with him and his colleagues and then all of a sudden did a 180 in the hallway? Maybe this is why he doesn't want her to leave as being a "man of power" and having a date (or whatever) run out hysterically would look really bad for him. Even if that was the case he's weak as fuck for not saying " You know what, I'm sorry let me walk you down" instead of begging and pleading for her to do something she has already said no to a million times. But with these questions in my mind it seems like a weak stupid man being baited. And this is my problem will all these witch hunts which are all the rage nowadays. It takes out of context things that happened decades ago and piles on "victim" after "victim" in an attempt too muddy the waters so it's impossible to get a clear understanding of what's going on. If this women really was a victim then I applaud her for going to the police. In less than 24 hrs they had a wire on her which completely blows this whole "no one would do anything and that guy is so rich and powerful I had to do what he said" argument right out of the water. Am I wrong here. Am I missing something?

[–]Koryphae_7 points8 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

The recording has been taken completely out of context. This has no value whatsoever. But it is a good tool to use, since idiots will eat it up as 'evidence' or whatnot.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 20 points21 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Actually, it shows what a no-game-having pussy beggar he is.

[–]Koryphae_0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Most definitely. But is he not being portrayed as a 'predator', a violent rapist or whatever? From the recording I would imagine he is just an average chump.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

The recording is only a snapshot. He could have been violent or forceful with other women and may well have with this girl once he got her in the room. Who knows?

[–]0signal020 points21 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Were the women forced to do those things?

No, they knew very well what they were doing.

women selling their integrity for fame and money, should they be also questioned?

Good luck with that in your cucked society.

and not merit, that method just happens to be disgusting and highly immoral.

That's Hollywood.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor10 points11 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Were the women forced to do those things? As in he threatened to replace them even though they've secured the role?

Forced? Such a strong word. There were probably naive girls that felling into his den of iniquity and did things they wouldn't normally do. Society failed to protect them (because men won the sexual revolution, but that's another story). However, this guy has had a very public reputation for a very, very long time. Women knew the score and yet still signed up for it.

Legal Cohabiting Female has a raging hard-on to help take this fucker down. There are a lot of women that are scouring past media for examples. She has been showing me a dozen clips a day about people PUBLICLY warning about him. You get this example because it was the last one she sent me in messenger

[–]2Dmva10017 points18 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

This is the first major instance of deliberate sheep-herding of the feminine to establish a power game in Hollywood to usher in more feminine influence into this 'space' which will subsequently result in more feminized male workers, culture, and of course, major films and all their propaganda.

The other women just jumped on the bandwagon so guys will think twice about this in the future. Desexualize, chip away piece by piece at the 'frame' of Hollywood, and beta-tize and bluepill every aspect.

More if this will come to dethrone male actors because we need wimmmiinn in those roles.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 30 points31 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

More if this will come to dethrone male actors because we need wimmmiinn in those roles.

Yep. Women don't want to take risks and actually build shit, they want to arrive and muscle in at the finish line. That's why you see tech companies start out with a core group of men and then women come in later in support roles (HR, Marketing, Legal) and try to pretend like they actually matter.

I've worked in CoporateLand for ~25 years, and HR is basically the Elephants' Graveyard for people with no talent.

[–]askmrcia7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You're absolutely right. The company I work for (software company created in the 90s) has a legal team of all women. Not one male.

Marketing was all women as well.

HR all women except one guy. The guy did data analytics, you know, something that requires actual skill like math.

[–]2Dmva1006 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This whole story is just another Woman vs. Man thing, and they beat him into submission

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor14 points15 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Hollywood has been losing their grip for a decade now. It will only quicken the decline. Turns out people just want to be entertained when they buy entertainment. Adjusted for inflation and population growth, even good years have been bad years. Weinstein himself has had a couple disastrous years and was already starting to get into financial trouble.

Fuck em. It's mostly trash they shit out these days. You want to feminize it? Go for it. I already don't care. Have fun alienating another quarter of the population of potential customers.

[–]1OneRedYear4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Micheal Moore is already calling for 50% of all film company board of directors to be female on his facebook page.

  1. The boards of directors of the Hollywood studios — and all across corporate America — must declare gender parity the new priority. Fifty-percent of all boards must be female. Hiring multiple female executives is the mandate. Of the top 100 grossing films each year, an average of only TWO are directed by women! All studios must commit to greenlighting more films by women (and, needless to say, by African Americans and other neglected groups).

I'm African American, don't throw me a bone for PC reasons, greenlight my film because it's an entertaining idea that will make us all money. Put me on the board because I earned it. Mandating numbers only gets you people who don't deserve to be there. Now you can say what you want about Harv, but he was there because he earned. Sure, he was shitbag, but he was a shitbag who earned. If you put non-earners in charge you will end up with a shit company. Make sure these mandated groups are full of actual earners.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Don't go to movies you don't like. Money runs Hollywood like any other business.

[–]Blackbull_ 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

BITTORRENT Bro

BITTORRENT

[–]reptile73832 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

So you are calling this all fake and claim all the women are lying?

[–]10xdada17 points18 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Excellent post.

I'd say he brought a lynching on himself by abusing power.

Generally I am against vigilante pile-ons, but what was their alternative against a guy with that kind of power? Problem is, now that the vigilante tactic has been legitimized by this exception, it gets worse before it gets better.

The big objection I will have once the smoke clears is how the "toxic masculinity," crowd is seizing the crisis to push their backward narrative. What he did was the most prime example of what a lack of masculinity looks like.

Weinsteins problem, his basic failure of masculinity, was when he rationalized that begging for sex re-balanced the power difference between him and people he was in a position of authority over.

That's the man hamster right there. the psychological mechanism behind that rationalization is so simple and so obvious how to fix it and prevent it. Maybe next post.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

True, the powerful don't beg once he did that he was fubar

[–]bolupua16 points17 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

If the guy did it for decades, means that he was mostly successful most of the time. I mean, what is the percentage of girls that "resisted" him? maybe 5%? 1%? that means he fucked hundreds.

I see it all the time: Rockstar/famous guy get busted for abusing 5 girls. Turns out, he fucked so many, that at the end he just assumed he can fuck anything.

[–]Senior Contributorexit_sandman5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I mean, what is the percentage of girls that "resisted" him? maybe 5%? 1%? that means he fucked hundreds.

Probably more, but most of them didn't get anywhere in Hollywood I guess.

[–]LordThunderbolt16 points17 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

What I find hilarious is the women who meet up with dudes in their hotel rooms for private auditions/business meeting/whatever. That's retarded. I'm a dude and I would never go to another dude's hotel room to discuss any type of business.

What are these hoes thinking???

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 14 points15 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

What are these hoes thinking???

Like I said, the Harve ain't asking them up to his hotel room to talk about Camus.

The one thing that Weingrabber would do would be to have a female assistant attend initially and then dismiss her, which is a sleaze move designed to lure girls to the meeting or, from Harve's point of view, the "MEATing". So that makes it a bit different, but any woman whose internal alarm doesn't go off at "meeting in a hotel room with a known sleaze" strains credulity.

[–]LordThunderbolt10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Even if the guy isn't a known sleaze. You don't meet soneone in their hotel room for a business meeting unless you're trying to move large amounts of cocaine or some shit. A hotel room is a too much of an initimate space to conduct business. These hoes brought it upon themselves. Not saying Harvey gets a pass, but damn these chicks are fucking morons.

[–]Senior ContributorSkorchZang9 points10 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Omg, I'm going to be famous.. Squee!

[–]WhySoRuff23 points24 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

I've read a lot of the articles on a lot of the sites and I must say this is a very entertaining portrayal of the story. I did notice one common phrase that kept being used in a lot of the articles which was "open secret." It reminded me of this one site that said 51% percent of people are in a secret club that the other 49% of people don't even know exists. The 49% percent are all men who don't know how sexually active women really are. The other 50% are all women who love to fuck and the remaining 1% are men that know what is going on and take advantage. Everyone in Hollywood is in that 51%. No fucking shit hot women give up the goods to rich and powerful men who could possibly better their lives. Hypergamy knows no bounds. This Weinstein case laid it out on full display; what women are willing to do to get what they want.

[–]Senior Contributorexit_sandman7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Ah, the Secret SocietyTM - yea, it exists. Maybe it's not 51% of people, but there is (or rather: was) definitely a lot of gaslighting going on regarding the sexual nature of women; which only the guys who were having casual kinky sex with them were aware of.

[–]WhySoRuff-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yea the numbers were hyperbolic but even tho years have passed since I read it, it still resonates with me.

[–]Endorsed Contributorsqerl5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

hot women give up the goods to rich and powerful men who could possibly better their lives.

Watched this happen when a hot co-worker saw an opportunity with a producer. She threw her pussy at him but she never got the payday she wanted. 6 months later she was back, a depressed and broken woman. Some captain save-a-ho will give her the life she so richly deserves.

[–]WhySoRuff4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I once picked up a chick from her workplace at an ad agency, she was some kind of secretary or assistant. I got there 5 minutes till and all the women poured out at once, dressed to impress even in their business attire they looked sexy and unusually done up. She sat in the car and I asked who's Bentley that was parked in the lot. She told me it belonged to the boss, I grinned as we drove off.

[–]SuwinTzi12 points13 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Some posters on T_D theorizing Emma Watson was one of his "girls".

Especially since she is now a manhater and comes off as a feminazi.

There was an article too about " Harveys girls", on mobile so you'll have to search yourself if interested

[–]tb876709 points10 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

Not siding with the women completely on this issue. What Harvey Weinstein did was a power-trip of amazing scope and I'm surprised in this environment he lasted this long, what he did was pretty scummy even for TRP standards of having no morals in the sexual marketplace. He only got away with the unwilling women not saying anything because he was so entrenched in the crooked Socialist/Democrat party. They are claiming rape now because they are all ashamed to have banged this beta for position and power but they are all not victims, they could have chosen not to indulge this guy or could've gone to the press about it.

All the women that blew him or banged him for parts or favors encouraged it. Film industry is bad is about this type of quid-pro-quo promotion and not just in America. Almost all Chinese actresses can have their nudes found online, look up the woman in the first Transporter movie or that Asian in The Wolverine. Almost every female actress east or west that is pretty got her part 99% by getting someone's dick wet, the eastern ones almost always start off with nude gigs. Cameron Diaz did at least one softcore bondage porn shoot and you can see her tits before she became one of Charlie's Angels. Linda Hamilton married a popular and successful director James Cameron. Remember that no-talent gal from Indiana Jones? What about that wooden acting Mary Sue from Star Wars episode 7? You know, the one who had everything handed to her in the plot because "Force" and Mary Sue magics. That gal in public is stiff like a statue and just can't act to save her life, you know she had to slob a knob for that high-brow part.

I will simplify this, look at most actresses from the past several years. Extremely hot model-quality women with limited experience and talent. You know what assets they got picked for? It's not acting chops. We all know this. The whole movie industry is based exactly on that sexual predation and women CHOOSE to indulge it. None of these women are victims in any way. They had a choice, give sex for money and fame or keep their morals. Guess what? Yep, lots of them given the opportunity hop on that old chub. That's not even as brazen as the porn industry where women have to literally fuck agents for their try-outs as the norm. They might not even get a call back. Porn stars in various documentaries freely admit to fucking the right guy for parts.

The film industry is going to have it's biggest producers and CEO's all start to resign as women rally together on the momentum of this current wave of accusations. Another guy in charge of movies for a digital online service had to resign, forgot if it was Amazon or Netflix. These guys have money and power but did not have game nor brains. Instead of the willing they forced themselves on the unwilling and we just saw that even the mega-rich can't sustain a blackout over their sexual blunders. These guys are merely rich betas that are still considered "creepy" by women.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 16 points17 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Not siding with the women completely on this issue.

Me either, but Weinstein is largely responsible - like 90% - for his own problems.

What about that wooden acting Mary Sue from Star Wars episode 7? You know, the one who had everything handed to her in the plot because "Force" and Mary Sue magics.

Episodes 4, 6 and 7 are the same fucking movie! It's all just crap meant to sell merch. They made Rey a chick and the stormtrooper a black dude (and the other pilot gay) because JJ Abrams is a liberal SJW. Even the 'Yoda' stand-in was femal for no reason important to the plot. From a plot perspective VII was a mess - 20 seconds after Rey discovers there's something call the 'Force' she's practically a Jedi Master. It was just weak all the way around.

The film industry is going to have it's biggest producers and CEO's all start to resign as women rally together on the momentum of this current wave of accusations.

It's going to turn into an SJW power grab. I can't say I feel sorry for them, although the movies are going to suck more now.

[–]tb876703 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Weinstein is just a beta that overused the rich and powerful card to compensate for how weak he was in other areas, specifically looks and game. He's an extreme end of the spectrum example of 'creepy' beta and got away with it by using his influence as a currency to buy silence.

Star Wars episodes 1-6 were not good but they weren't bad, it was average all around. Other sci-fi competed with that average. Episode 7 is full on SJW, even the one badass guy turns out they are making him gay. They just do not want another Han Solo, so bad they actually killed Han Solo in this movie and made his badass overconfident kid the quintessential bad guy. That whole thing just reeks of anti-masculinity SJW bullshit.

[–]Senior Contributorexit_sandman1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

20 seconds after Rey discovers there's something call the 'Force' she's practically a Jedi Master. It was just weak all the way around.

True. There's the rumor going around that she's a female clone of Anakin Skywalker which would literally be the only way this would just remotely make sense (Force Avatar and all that). But since I doubt that this'll happen, it's just shitty writing.

[–]Westernhagen1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

she's a female clone of Anakin Skywalker which would literally be the only way this would just remotely make sense

Even Anakin and Luke needed years of Jedi training... and Luke remained incompetent even after Yoda's training. But ass-kicking Jedigrrrrrls don't need no man to train them up, no sir!

[–]Senior Contributorexit_sandman0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Anakin was some sort of force prodigy with all that podracing, so who knows what he would be capable of.

However, I have to correct myself: Anakin already was shitty writing, SW7TFA just doubled down on that with Rey.

[–]Westernhagen1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

The screenwriting has been awful since Empire Strikes Back. The three prequels were unbearably painful dogshit, especially the dialogue. I don't have high expectations of the new movies.

[–]2Overkillengine1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That's not even as brazen as the porn industry where women have to literally fuck agents for their try-outs as the norm. They might not even get a call back. Porn stars in various documentaries freely admit to fucking the right guy for parts.

Ironically the porn industry may end up being more ethical than mainstream Hollywood.

[–]saibot839 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The main takeaway from this whole mess is that women are shameless whores who will capitalize on their fuckability and turn around to cry raaaaape when the slightest hint of shitfanning arises. Harvey's scum, make no mistake but these women are disgusting too. It's probably safe to assume all the currently big actresses (Emma Stone, JLaw, Alicia Vikander, etc, etc...) have sucked mucho cock on the way to fame and stardom. Notice how deathly silent Emma Stone is, for instance (this from a person who stated very recently that she wants to be more outspoken and opinionated publicly about feminism and... stuff). Sure, she doesn't have a lot of Harvey connections but almost every actor/actress have released some sort of statement regarding this shit show. You don't get to become the biggest, most highly paid actress in the world without some "sacrifices" along the way. In Harvey's own words: "This is how the business works".

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

So for people wondering "how" and "why now" here are a couple of tidbits:

Bob Weinstein Gets Emotional on "Depraved" Harvey, Saving the Company and His "Waking Nightmare"

Harvey Weinstein's company gets a financial lifeline as he faces new criminal probe

Except it ain't gonna be the Harve's company for much longer.

So yeah, given that details internal to the company have been leaked, I would not be surprised if it turned out to be: "Little Brother", in the Board Room, with the Shiv.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That audio recording was fucking painful. What a total pussy.

[–]hodltaco5 points6 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

The one thing I'm not hearing being talked about are the victims. There's enough writing on the wall to assume Weinstein is guilty of some pretty heinous, unforgivable blue-pill shit but I ponder the victims.

The victims span decades. Some were successful, some were not. Their ages apparently 17 and up. Some of these actresses are still working and some are retired. So my question is: why the silence? It took the guys brother allegedly to rat on him otherwise none of this would have come to light. I mean, why weren't the retired women saying anything? Angelina Jolie, who has publicly stated she's done acting, had nothing to say?

Again, I think Weinstein is guilty as fuck. In the very outer rings of Hollywood that I circulate in stories about Weinstein were the stuff of legend. From what I've heard from decades ago a lot more has yet to surface. I always thought it was a bit of fiction. So much time and not one public peep from any of these women.

[–]WalterEArmstrong1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

He had photos and videos of the women in "compromising positions" (i.e. blackmail).

[–]hodltaco-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I didn't know this. That part of the story hasn't popped up in anything I've read. Could you supply a link or a source? If that's true he's looking at a major prison sentence.

[–]Endorsed ContributorJamesSkepp5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

If you listen to the audio recording made by Ambra Battilana Gutierrez

That recording clearly shows that no amount of status and money will EVER make up for lack of game. And looking like a normal human being.

It was also super cringeworthy to listen. A fat slob pleading(!) with a woman to come closer so he can molest her.

[–]Hjalmbere6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe I'm jaded, but I'm suspecting a lot of has-beens jumping on to the slag off Harv-train because they a) want to sue for damages b) regret rape now that it's official that the dude was a sleaze bag.

I also suspect the ball just started rolling. This will turn into a hysteria of epic proportions. Others will be accused.Rightly or wrongly.

[–]1PantsonFire12342 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I've said this allot to guys who think that becoming rich will solve their problems. Without anything else going for them they will generally just be used as never ending wallets. You need an attitude, a look or an interesting life. His jewness could have used the fruits of his jewing to live an amazing life, pursuit many passions, fuck it that he's fat it wouldn't have mattered.

But to every woman all they saw was some creepy suit with lots of dollars. Money means fuck all if you don't use it to self actualize an interesting persona. A woman will see your never ending bank account as exploitable. And that's what you'll be.

Guys who haven't been very fortunate with their genetics figure that earning money is their solution. And in that process they never develop an interesting personality of people skills (good ones). They never find that which really makes them tick, besides being fucking rich. And they suffer for it. Money, like women, should be a means to an end. Never your only goal.

[–]Occams_Stubble4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

But no, it was “Me want pooosy! Me want cookie! Me want hand job! Me want pizza!” He had to go after everything in a skirt, because he was drunk on his own power.

Everything in the world is about sex except sex. Sex is about power ~Oscar Wilde

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

One of my favorite quotes. Have an upvote, sir!

[–]mitzibishi 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

Harvey thought he was the shark catching minnows. But Harvey put himself in a position to be a target for oportunists and sharks like Ambra Bittalana. Apparently she finds herself alone quite a lot with rich powerful men. Not the innocent flower she makes out.

[–]Endorsed ContributorJamesSkepp6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

But Harvey put himself in a position to be a target for oportunists and sharks like Ambra Bittalana.

Only b/c he was a disgusting looking and behaving like a weakling, women despise men like that. Had he been an attractive, this whole situation would probably never been classified as sexual molestation by the women who met him.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

"Identify the pool of women who are attracted to you, and draw plates, girlfriends, LTRs from that pool."

This is the most important sentence ever written on reddit.

[–]1Sir_Distic1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

He also sexually assaulted Terry Crews. Terry Crews the muscular black guy from the Expendables. Yes that guy. He grabbed his dick. Terry's wife saw it too. But he didn't speak out because Harvey had power.

Terry posted a Tweet about it when the story broke.

Keep that in mind when discussing Harvey. This isn't just a female thing.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Was that specifically Weinstein? I don't care either way, but the only thing I saw was that Crews said a studio head groped him.

[–]pbgswd1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

drunk on money and power. Well said.

[–]10xdada3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Can't help but wonder if a big reason this happened is that he, and the rest of Hollywood, no longer has cover in the Whitehouse.

Trump isn't good for much, but he doesn't owe these people anything. As I understood it, there is a layer of PR agencies who do both celebrity and political work, and they can put pressure on MSM publishers and network heads using their political connections. e.g. "don't publish/broadcast that thing on this producer, or my Democratic party/senator friend will make your acquisition/licensing deals difficult."

Now that Hollywood doesn't that have top down protection either from having recipients of their donations in office, or through politically connected PR/crisis companies to keep stories out of the MSM, there will probably be more revelations.

When that swamp gas goes up and ignites, phewee, it blows up good.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

This explains the relentless attacks on Breitbart, Trumps tweets and other fake news

God help the elites if the masses have a source of truth

[–]JustSomeThief 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

Identify the pool of women who are attracted to you, and draw plates, girlfriends, LTRs from that pool.

How the hell do I do that?

All my GFs have been "alternative black girls" (good looking, bullied, out casted gothic black girls). And a white Bipolar girl. Only 3 girls in life, and such a small sample size.

How do i identify the type of girl thats into me?

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

How the hell do I do that?

It comes with experience. I know, for example, that I am going to do better on average with tall women (I'm 6'2", so 5'9+ plus is home for me). I also do well with introverts, because I know when to take my foot off the gas and with brainy chicks, because I have the grey matter to fence with them. /sorted

[–]Senior Contributorexit_sandman4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

gothic black girls

That's a thing?

From my perspective the Dark Culture (gothic, metal, dark wave, industrial etc.) is something that nigh-exclusively consists of whites and to a lesser degree asians.

(then again there are rather few blacks in my country, so I can't tell how it looks beneath the surface.)

[–]Proto_Sigma3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

It's not a type so much. You identify by behavior. Is she smiling a lot around you? Is she playing with her hair a lot? Is she facing you or looking at you? When you touch her does she seem pleased and reciprocate or does she seem displeased and recoil? When you make a sexual joke, does she laugh or cry out 'that's disgusting? Learn to read the signals and you can get an idea really damn fast.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This is all true, but you can have a "type" you do well with, also.

[–]SpaceTimeinFlux1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Where the hell are you finding black got chicks?

[–]UGAE 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

Where the fuck did you find gothic black girls. What state do you live in?

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

excellent research skills. But old school. No APA format.

B+

[–]fartingaround1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

"There must be a force to be multiplied." This is a subtle yet important piece of advice. When first swallowing the red pill it is easy to forget that your character needs some substance before applying the concepts. My 2 cents....

[–]AllahHatesFags1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

IDGAF about Weinstein, but I am pretty sure many of his accusers rode his cock to stardom willingly and are making regret rape allegations because it now safe to do so. It's easier to accuse a man of rape than to admit you whored yourself out for fame and money.

[–]Conceited-Monkey0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

If you think if Weinstein had game he would be able to get aspiring actresses to be attracted to him you are delusional, unless game manages to convince women that short, fat, bald guys have great genetics. Weinstein’s money would have allowed him to rent women, but spare me the idea that he could have developed a harem by working on his personality.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

He could not have gotten every girl utilizing game, but he could have enjoyed a substantial harem (and may well have, aside from the women he stupidly groped).

great genetics.

While it is better to be attractive than unattractive, and beauty is the EZ Pass of life, it's not the end all, be all, at least for men. How do I know? Because I look like I'm made up out of spare dinosaur parts and yet guys here would crawl on their bellies through broken glass to nail my OLTRs, my side chicks and assorted exes. Wrap your head around this: assorted models aside, somewhere out there, walking around, is a Miss September whose plumbing I have plunged. And I wasn't ever standing outside a hotel room begging her to come in and watch me take a shower or jack off.

Weinstein did, in one sense, make himself exceptional: he had a lot of power (and money) in the film industry. But he wasn't a closer, and he had shit game and ZERO self control (which also explains his bulk) and and that's why he's where he's at.

Bear in mind, I'm not here trying to sell guys my PUA program of "Do what I do, and you will be banging your way through the VS angels." But having tight game is going to let guys do better with women and help them be the best versions of themselves they can be.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Just a thought - how many of these celebs got caught with their pants down during that whole fappening scenario?

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I wonder if the "Fappening" was really someone hacking into Harvey Weinstein's mobile phone....

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Holy shit, we did it reddit

[–]propesh 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

Ha the same reason the allegations came out, are the same reasons this is a good post. Bullshit.

You see, if someone lives 10% of HW life, it would be a rare event in the history of this fucking universe.

THe man is filthy wealthy, has had the hottest poon in SoCal, not in jail or dead, and will live to a reasonable old age.

If that is not legendary. Jesus we have high standards (which is BS)

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

not in jail

Yet.

That said, he could have maintained this lifestyle without being a bluepill pussy-begging moron. If he had just managed some self control he'd have gone down as a swordsman, like Nicholson or Beatty.

[–]propesh 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

You consider what he did blue pill. Which is the blue pill view of it to begin with. Why are you viewing this from only one angle?

"A dominant animal is one whose sexual, feeding, aggressive, and other behavior patterns subsequently occur with relatively little influence of other group members. Subordinate are the opposite."

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

You consider what he did blue pill.

I consider him to be a malignant narcissist and a sociopath. There is nothing red pill about that. His method of luring women into his hotel room was to be a pussy beggar. Again, not red pill.

"A dominant animal is one whose sexual, feeding, aggressive, and other behavior patterns subsequently occur with relatively little influence of other group members. Subordinate are the opposite."

What you're describing is...wait for it...a predator. That's fine...for the animal kingdom, but not for humans. He could have had a great life as a mult-multi-millionaire, powerful film guy and legendary poon slayer....except he couldn't control himself and do base-level civilized things like not rape girls who didn't want to bang him. Now he has 3 separate prosecutors (NY, LA, London) going over shit looking for things to charge him with. There's something to be said for self-control.

[–]propesh 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

"That's fine...for the animal kingdom, but not for humans."

That's an "ought" statement; a moral position. Which I happen to agree with, but not everyone seeks to compete on moral and virtuous grounds; that's a red pill foundation. The law cannot right every wrong.

Moreover, one "ought" not to judge a fellow man unless he understands what it is like to be in his position. We can banter around morality forever.

He got away with it and has an army of lawyers to protect him. The red pill isin't always an easy pill to swallow, but its reality.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

"That's fine...for the animal kingdom, but not for humans." That's an "ought" statement; a moral position.

It's a description of the reality in which Weingrabber lives, which he knew because he employed people to make the bad stuff go away.

One "ought" not judge a fellow man unless he understands what it is like to be in his position.

Not true. I do not have to know what it's like to run a particular business in order to advise them on contract law. Similarly, one would hope that you and I and others (including Harvey Weinstein) would have enough of an understanding of every day events and behaviors to be able to conduct ourselves properly in civilized society.

[–]15640012 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

"In fact, he's a liberal, blue pill predator...."

This conflates liberal and blue pill, when in fact there is no connection between his liberalism, blue pill mentality, and tendency toward predatory behavior. The conflation of those three separate factors confuses the issue and weakens your argument, as it would require you to connect those three logically.

Specifically, his liberalism has little to do with being a sexual predator. There are plenty of sexual predators all along the political spectrum.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This conflates liberal and blue pill, when in fact there is no connection between his liberalism, blue pill mentality, and tendency toward predatory behavior.

The phrase is descriptive. For example, if I said I was "a tall, white, redhead", that would likewise be descriptive, even if those factors are un-related, or only tangentially related.

Specifically, his liberalism has little to do with being a sexual predator.

I did not, nor need I, make that argument - although there is certainly a lot of repressed anger among liberal men. That said, he blue-pillness explains how he got caught on tape being a pussy beggar. Furthermore, he got a pass on things because he presented the "correct" opinions in public and cultivated the "right friends" and donated to the "right causes".

There are plenty of sexual predators all along the political spectrum.

Immaterial to the discussion of Weingrabber and how he wound up where he is.

[–]Mr-Ed2090 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Hypergamy in action.

Theres no way he would keep this behaviour up if it wasn't working for him, probably with waitresses in LA. When he tried the same approach on millionaire actresses only then was he was met with rejection.

Still a dumb fucking move on his part..

[–]Bumboking0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

When did red pillers start siding with feminists against men. 'Predator' your even using the language the enemy uses to demonise men. Congratulations OP you have joined the feminist which hunt on men. Luckily for you I have just the right prescription, take two red pills and then post again after your cured.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Congratulations OP you have joined the feminist which hunt on men.

This wasn't a witch hunt; the Harve is an actual sleazoid and he does not deserved to be defended. What he did was wrong. Beyond that it may well turn into a witch hunt similar to what happened at Duke, UVA and on other campuses.

[–]2Overkillengine1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

So we should blindly defend him just because he has a penis? Get bent, that dude is a liability at best. He fucked up of his own free will, and decades of chickens are coming to roost because of that, and the fallout is going to hit more than him. He deserves no pity or allegiance.

[–]SonOfTerra920 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

They strung the Jew up to dry.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

But not because he was Jewish. This was Hollywood, after all.

[–]memphisjohn0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Here's the part I don't understand: why now?

HW has been doing this for decades. It's been an open secret. He was protected though. What changed?

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

He was protected though. What changed?

I think his brother made a move on him. Bob wanted him out, which is why you see internal communications from TWC coming out.

TMZ put out a part of the Harve's employment contract, which included escalating liquidated damages for every lawsuit for the Harve's titty-grabbing that they TWC had to settle. That could have only come from the inside.

Beyond that, as a society, the SJWs can use media platforms to make sure their enemies 'get got'. Online shaming is a thing, now, for good and for ill. Plus Weingrabber didn't have the same clout he used to have. People didn't need him as much and he became vulnerable.

Bear in mind that there are guys like Jack Nicholson, who is a horny old goat, who can get away with a lot because he knows what he's about. And sure, he's famous, but that guy hasn't been handsome in a loooong time. You can leverage money fame and power to be a baller but the Harve was simply a pig with no self control. "Little Brother" saw where the culture was - the 'untouchable' Bill Cosby's fall from grace because of some stand-up comedian - and he put a shiv in his brother.

That's just one theory. I could be way wrong.

[–]yomo860 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

One of the biggest mistakes he made was, he didn't own it. Hefner was 92 and fucked women a fraction his age. He had no game, and if, he was not physically able to put up with a 21yo, he also had money, but you knew - a rape allegation was unlikely. He was already drowning in pussy why would he rape. Same with Leo or Clooney. Could you imagine the endless laugh track if some bimbo accused Hefner of rape?

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Agree. Harvey was "exceptional" in the level of his money and power, but he went about it the wrong way. There were plenty of women who would have been DTF him based on what he could do for their careers, but he tried to force himself on women who were not DTF. STOOPID.

[–]Desadarius-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Who. The. Fuck. Cares.

Seriously, this a step away from a fucking people magazine article.

[–]V1SoR-3 points-2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

but the greatest of these is Game

If you're a male supermodel, you may as well confess in being a pedo or anything similar. She will still be wet. This has been proven countless times and if you still want to insist that "game" tramples all, then that's your personal coping mechanism for lack of money/looks. This is also the idea PUA is selling, which is known to be mostly false.

The hotter you are, the more you can act like a woman -- just "be there" and do nothing; they'll be all over you with almost no effort from your side.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

If you're a male supermodel

You'd very likely be a raging homosexual.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

If you're a male supermodel

Stop right there.

If you are a "male supermodel" then you are an outlier, pussy falls from the sky into your lap, and you don't need TRP's help to get laid. The guys in the top 5% know they are in the top 5% and they don't need help.

if you still want to insist that "game" tramples all, then that's your personal coping mechanism for lack of money/looks.

I think, for the average guy - which is how I typical phrase it - game is the most important because it is the area where the most improvement is possible. As it turns out, I'm tall and not at all hurting for cash, but I DEFINITELY get more and higher grade women as a result of understanding how to talk to them, which I freely admit because - wait for it - there is No Shame In My Game.

This is also the idea PUA is selling, which is known to be mostly false.

I am not "selling" anything. I'm trying to help guys learn to be the best version of themselves, and I am doing it FOR FREE. If you want to go "just be yourself", then that's your call.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2022. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter