The Social Credit Score system takes hold in it's first bold move "Tinder will soon let you run a background check on a potential date." This will become a norm. Blackballing people and reporting on bad dates will follow. MARK MY WORDS.

March 15, 2021
337 upvotes

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/TheRedPill.

/r/TheRedPill archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Title The Social Credit Score system takes hold in it's first bold move "Tinder will soon let you run a background check on a potential date." This will become a norm. Blackballing people and reporting on bad dates will follow. MARK MY WORDS.
Author redpillschool
Upvotes 337
Comments 106
Date March 15, 2021 8:20 PM UTC (2 months ago)
Subreddit /r/TheRedPill
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/the-social-credit-score-system-takes-hold-in-its.751171
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/m5tvn4/the_social_credit_score_system_takes_hold_in_its/
Similar Posts
Red Pill terms in post
Comments

[–]comcain93 points94 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

True. Pre-printed divorce forms come with "Domestic Violence" pre-printed on them, with the box checked.

There's a whole industry out there teaching girls how to complain of domestic violence, what to say, how to get him arrested, and how to get a restraining order. It happened to me. The whole thing took 3 hours start to finish.

In my case, my ex couldn't pick one lie and stick with it, so she gave 6 cops 6 wildly differing stories of what happened. My kids also wrote up statements saying I did nothing wrong.

The whole thing was thrown out by the DA as unwinnable.

Still, I might have a very old restraining order on me, depending on if the County purged it properly.

This all sucks.

Cheers

[–]DareyFathom16 points17 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Restraining orders/Protection from Abuse orders are pretty much always issued out based on whoever the first party file is. Domestic Arrests are almost unequivocally prejudicial against men. I've had multiple ADAs say how they don't want cross complainants and to only take the men for better conviction rates.

[–]deleted_redacted65 points66 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

I wonder if this would work for guys too, I would like to know how many Tinder dates, if they have a only fans or other, possible STDs, and body count. If they could give this information it would be worth paying for.

[–]SlightlyAdventurous45 points46 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Pretty much all of those are unmeasurable unless the subject is honest, and no woman is ever going to answer such questions honestly.

[–]BeeRaddBroodler15 points16 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I used to work with a girl who said she had slept with over 300 dudes. Props for the honesty , but I mean god damn. I wonder what the percentage of women who have over 100 body count

[–]DamnWhatAFeelin7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I wonder what the percentage of women who have over 100 body count

A lot higher than most realise.

In my uni group, there were 7 girls. 2 of those girls had a different guy each time they went out clubbing. 29% (rounded) of the female half of the group had fucked over 100 dudes by the time they graduated.

Admittedly it's too small of a sample size to run with but it's something to work from.

Edit: Curiosity got the better of me and I looked them both up on social. One is a single mother to two children, the father is not involved based on the comments. The other appears to be reasonably successful and settled down with a good looking guy. I wonder how much the chap knows about her uni days? Very little I'd bet. If he did know, he'd run a mile I'm sure.

[–]deleted_redacted6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I wasn't thinking that they would be giving them surveys to fill out. I was thinking more along the lines of collecting what information is available in the open and semi private locations and congealing it into a report.

[–]BonjourReturn1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

that's why there is the X2-3 for body count and OF should be easy to check out. for STD's it is another story...

[–]Smerdakas148 points149 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

This looks more like a woke-ish "protect wymyn" move, that might also scare girls into buying Tinder premium or whatever its name is, so more money for Tinder. Reporting on bad dates will never be a thing, bc the app would lose millions of users.

Also Tinder is used everywhere in the world, so accessing criminal records in jurisdictions outside the US might not be as easy. Limited geographical scope.

[–]Tousen7179 points80 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

This won’t work. It’ll be seen as discriminatory, disenfranchising black and brown minorities who’ve been caught up in the system...a public apology will follow.

[–]randarrow17 points18 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Nah, they'll have a curve for disadvantagedness.

[–]colinnb14 points15 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

How dare these white supremisists do these racist forms of Jim Crow dating suppression tactics

[–]s2923 points24 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

lol they aren't reporting drug possession charges because it's "discriminatory against minorities".

Yeah because whitey got you hooked on coke. Violence is also discriminatory. 13/50

[–]Endorsed ContributorRunawayGrain46 points47 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I read the statement, then I read the Garbo site. Tinder's about to get turned into an industrial red pill factory.

[–]were_gonna_make_it28 points29 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Lmao. And they excluded drug charges for exactly that reason. Too bad they didn't check the other crime stats.

[–]roco-j5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Tinder's about to get turned into an industrial red pill factory.

Why? Dumb me wants to understand

[–]Endorsed ContributorRunawayGrain5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

First off, Match is doing this through a third party non profit. They know it's gonna be a hot potato for lawsuits.

Second, the non profit already said they aren't going to report all of the arrest records in the name of 'equity.' So by admissions they aren't giving an unbiased report and letting the end user decide. Human nature dictates it won't be long before that power gets abused in the name of 'equity.'

They say they are working on some sort of manual submission for allegations as well. Given the amount of SJW rhetoric on their website, I'd be wary that this would lean towards overly credulous instead of innocent until proven guilty.

[–]1arakouzo86 points87 points  (17 children) | Copy Link

This won't get far if they charge for background checks. No woman is going to pay for that

More likely, the system will pass the cost of background checks on to men - something like men pay a fee to make their background check results accessible to a certain number of women. Or just require men to pass a background check to participate at all.

And not today, not at first, but down the line, things like where you work and what you've posted on social media will be part of what gets found out in a background check. Not just your arrest record.

The day is coming where if you posted the wrong stuff on Facebook or if you don't upload proof of your Covid vaccine or if your personal contact information hasn't been verified to make sure you can be tracked down if a woman is not satisfied with your honesty about your life circumstances and income, wants to come back around to accuse you of rape, or if a pregnancy results - you can't swipe or be swiped on. You're going to have to provide KYC info to Tinder to enable yourself to be found in the real world in case a woman wants to come after you.

[–]Warped_Mindless33 points34 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

This is exactly what will happen... eventually.

They cant have people guilty of "wrong think" being able to participate in society.

[–]laredditcensorship7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

We live in a pretend society where fakeness is worshipped.

We live in a pretend society that's backstabbing individuals on global scale.

We live in AdLandia, AllGoodLandia.

Welcome to AdLandia, AllGoodLandia!

Where:

you have no voice,

you have no choice,

you have no space,

you have no escape,

you have no respect.

Where history gets deleted,

and future censored.

Where is the support when you need it?

It doesn't exist. Because it is unnecessary as everything is already "fixed."

[–]AverageInternetUser27 points28 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

No reason to be on social media imo. It's a life log that will be called back in your future, doesn't matter if it's acceptable to say now it may not be later

[–]jasondads13 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

and yet here we are, on reddit, a public forum

[–]armenian_UwUcide1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s a tad bit more anonymous. Just a tad. For now.

[–]ThenIJizzedInMyPants7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

More likely, the system will pass the cost of background checks on to men - something like men pay a fee to make their background check results accessible to a certain number of women. Or just require men to pass a background check to participate at all.

Agreed. And plenty of men will pay for this shit for a chance at that pussy

[–]Danomit32 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Most of them already pay a portion of their monthly salary and their videos on top of it, so I wouldn't be surprised to see them get suckered into paying for that as well.

[–]Animus-Meus51 points52 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

My employer already has a whole department dedicated to finding "slanderous or otherwise vulgar speech towards persecuted minorities and genders" on social media. We should have never let them vote. HR bullshit in everything. "Career women" are miserable, who the fuck thinks being a slave to corporate America is empowering?

[–]ThenIJizzedInMyPants20 points21 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Ever notice how any pro-woman 'day' or pro woman celebration involves some praise about 'boss girls' and boss bitches and career women? The oligarchy has successfully created a new class of slaves convinced they are 'independent' and 'powerful' while working for peanuts in a shitty job. men created this system, so we know the goal is make money and gtfo.

[–]dopexile31 points32 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

It is becoming untenable to work at a corporation. The diversity\implicit bias programs basically indoctrinate people to hate white males and hire anyone else.

If you are a white male in the future the only way to get a job will be to increase your diversity score by using gender reassignment therapy.

I think you are better off being a consultant that solves all the problems caused by these unqualified diversity hires or just working for a small business.

[–]entrep427 points28 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I officially changed my gender in the company's systems to "other". Now they can't use my gender in statistics and manipulate them to say that women are oppressed and don't get paid enough.

I suggest you all do the same too.

My company has gone full woke and it's shit. They're even introducing gender diversity hiring "guidelines" now so managers are "encouraged" to hire a diverse workforce... By discriminating against male candidates.

The only way to win is to use their own rules against them. Get your gender changed to "other".

[–]armenian_UwUcide1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

TIL that the real redpill was embracing one’s inner non-binary femboy all along

[–]entrep41 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

How did you know my preferred pronoun was "one"? Thank you so much for using it without even being asked

/s

[–]armenian_UwUcide1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Pfft subhuman. I personally prefer “they” as I identify as a squirming mass of eels in a trench coat

[–]BeeRaddBroodler13 points14 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Small business for the win. I work for a company of 15 people. It’s the best job I’ve ever had.

[–]AnalGodZepp2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You know what's funny? Men would still pay for those background checks

[–]TheSmile_100 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

The Great Reset.

It's all been announced, it's all public.

[–]Lostfate0922 points23 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Tinder can suck my dick. NEXT

[–]Kyegrr5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I mean it can but you’re gonna have to just like what you get

[–]spndxwra0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

lol yeah, someone in the 'other' category..

[–]armenian_UwUcide1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

“App with proportionally high amount of harpy whales will now allow the orcas to run a background check on you”

Oh the horror! What ever will we do without our supply of egotistical belugas?

[–]RatingsOutOfTen19 points20 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This is going to work against women in the end.

Even if it a woman's lie needs to be 100% proven, there will be ways to run a woman's name and information to determine that she has unproven claims and is likely to call the police on a man.

Be careful what you wish for... both men, and women.

[–]evoblade19 points20 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh cool, now the random chicks that try to get you to cash app them some money right off the bat can blackmail you for your social credit score. Neato, tinder!

[–]DareyFathom47 points48 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm a crime data analyst. I'd like to see what dataset they're working off of. I'd be shocked if possession crimes have no predictive value in violent felonies. Most likely is libtard data manipulation.

[–]Kyegrr13 points14 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I had a dream last night they made it literally illegal not to have a registered big dick license, so I’ll be safe from that but the force is telling us something with these disturbances guys

[–]strikethrough1237 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That would be great. “Do you have a license for that dick? No? dials 911”.

[–]NahDukeFkThat38 points39 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Use tinder in 2021 if you want STDs.

[–]Protocol_Apollo26 points27 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Gotta collect them all

[–]LogicalOlive10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Black Mirror called it nice....

[–]collegeguy1158 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Moral of the story, start sanitizing your digital history.

[–]5ItsDantesWorld29 points30 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

So what happens when they run the check on a guy and it comes up he's an Armed Robber or a Murderer? Instant Alpha Status, probably.

[–]DareyFathom10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

If he looks like Jeremy Meeks he'll get billionaires throwing their pussy at him.

[–]1_do_not_read_this_10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Would there be some way to ... embellish ... my background check?

I dunno, add a few attempted murders, maybe an arson.

[–]nickdimitrov4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Tinder didn't think it through. Guys will try to get records just to get more matches

[–]ThenIJizzedInMyPants1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

hah i was thinking this exactly

[–]Venny_126 points27 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I get this eery suspicious there will be women who find out someone is a domestic abuser, ex-convict etc., only to be showering this type of guy with an endless supply of pussy. Bundy received hundreds of love letters, and Dahmer's amours were no slouches either. Soon women will have access to such vital dating information at their finger tips to make a more sober and levelheaded decision in their life.

Time to get a criminal record I guess??!!

[–]Vynxe-Vainglory4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This is the first thing I thought.

Bad boys slay the pussy. Even the really, really bad boys.

If they are ugly as shit, they'll get a lot less, but they still fuck.

[–]1redditthrowaway14788 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol tell me with a straight face this wont get abused so much that it entirely defeats the purpose.

Woman has a bad date - bad review

Woman had an ok date, but you made a weird joke that didn’t quite land - bad review

Woman has good date, but you asked to split the bill - bad review

Woman has a great date, but you slow fade - bad review

Girl doesn’t respond to your message - you leave a bad review

Girl does respond to message but not how you want - bad review

Guys begin using reviews as leverage and game once they figure out they totally can...

No way anything comes of this - it would be a disaster for tinder. The announcement is probably just to crowdsource for reasons not to fuck themselves over.

[–]CuntMonteCristo23 points24 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Social credit score is coming for us all everywhere, just a matter of time and part of the plan...

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 18 points19 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

It won't take long for some of my predictions to come true:

  • Tinder will require you upload vaccine proof to us it.

  • Social credit score (SCS) will be implemented via the tech industry. You will need to "voluntarily" participate to have FB, Twitter, Insta, etc.

  • At first they will insist the verify process is private. But soon, your rep follows you to all accounts. Goodbye to anonymous users.

This is just the first step. This will all be normalized by the end of the year.

Make no mistake, background checks will include vaccination records.

[–]ThenIJizzedInMyPants4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

yep eventually the SCS will become like credit agencies... ostensibly private but used and abused by every company and govt agency under the sun

[–]Ch4ngT5ung-5 points-4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I hope they include vaccine proof, then ill be able to know which girls are sterile

[–]renegadelurkerr5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Tinder already does this shit through its banning process. Get enough women to report you for your pump and dump habit and you’re done.

[–]TeddyMGTOW3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

no more pump and dumps? lol

[–]danddrox5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

laughs in gay cruising

[–]therealpkg3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I see no way this goes wrong lol. As all of us here know, be careful what you wish for. The quality men are going to filter out all the garbo (see what I did there) women just as easily. And, as an app that basically self selects for low value women, I can't wait for this to bite them in the ass.

[–]DownVotesWrongsOnly4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Good. This will kill it. Let the monster die.

[–]Superl00se2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

"Gender based violence"

More woke bullshit.

[–]hockeyaddict872 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Women like guys who they find attractive no matter there criminal record. If anything they will find it hot

[–]raggot_the_legendary5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Not that you needed any flag of political activism in the text itself to see through who they are, but in one single sentence you find,

"blah blah Black people ... Blah blah white people"

Where "Black" is capital and "white" isn't.

The unpunishable new frontiers of racism.

[–]the40yearoldincel2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

When are men going to wake up and get off those stupid dating apps. If there has ever been a need for a mass exodus of something, it's crap like Tinder.

[–]manatrees8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Most people: "Oh wow, now I can know if a guy on Tinder beats people or has other violent tendencies"

RP: "First they came for the violent sociopaths, and I said every fringe theory i could find"

[–]vampirejessica1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well i dont use tinder and I don't care

[–]darkstar10311 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Why the fuck you using Tinder? Tinder is for losers who don't have the balls to cold approach.

[–]Faerlian0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I used to cold approach.... now I save it for the best.

[–]cnwilks0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Reminds me a lot of this scene from "Amazon women on the moon" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HufRCqkURQ8

[–]TRP Vanguardnicethingyoucanthave0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Show me the ChadFax tm

lol, Tinder isn't dumb enough to ask women to pay for anything, so the way this will work is, you as a male will have the option of giving up your SSN and paying a small fee to have a background check done. Tinder will then put a little star on your account and you'll be a verified beta, or whatever.

Here's the thing though:

  • if you're attractive, it wont matter to a woman if you have the background check or not. It wouldn't matter if you were a violent felon. Women love felons! Hell, if Tinder is smart they'll let men with no criminal record pay for a fake criminal record so they have bad boy cred.

  • if you're not attractive, being a verified beta wont help you. No woman is ever going to look at you and think "he's not attractive, but wait a second, what's this? He's never been to jail! Oh the tingling in my vagina!"

The basics of human sexuality that you've learned here on TRP still apply. Be the best version of yourself that you can be. Be in good shape, be masculine, be strong, confident, assertive, clever, and ambitious. Do the work to be attractive. There's no shortcut in the form of a background check that will help you, and there's no threat in the form of a background check that will hurt you.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2021. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter