A Baseline RP to Swallow
You aren't a human being to them. In the same way that you are not a human being to the CEO of your company, you are a value-producing asset. An object to be milked and compensated enough that you do not leave.
You are an object to be used. If you do not believe me, look at how women treat guys who are poor minorities. They make videos trashing them for telling her that she's pretty on the NY streets. Look at how women in relationship forums and threads describe their husbands. Look at how women talk about their boyfriends to OTHER women when they think no one is listening. Objects - we are at best a wallet and a dick to them, and at worst a stain, a piece of trash clogging up the pretty picture in front of them.
Even if you believe you're her "captain" and her "soulmate" - see how captainly she treats you if your money dries up or you get injured or sick. See what happens if there's a more "captainly" man at the office who's 6'3'', ripped, rich, and flirting with her on a daily basis. Watch how quick that ho breaks down. *All these RPWs circlejerking over at RPW about how they treat their man like a captain and help him and contribute 50% to the relationship... watch how fast these women will upgrade if a better man came along. I respect them for being able to harbor RP ideologies in their head without their mind exploding to cognitive dissonance, but trust me these women are no different. There are no unicorns.
You are an object. Embrace your objectness. It's OK, everyone treats everyone like objects, this is the way of the world. You need to objectify her, or you are fighting from the "low ground".
S/O to Feminism
Feminists really have nailed it. Their tizzy over the word "objectification" is really telling. They define objectification and looking at a woman and subtracting her internal personality from your gaze. You see her for what she is, rather than how she wants to be seen. If she's slutting around on magazines for cash like a racy model, you see her as a hot piece of size 0 ass that you want to dick down, because that's what she is. Objectification of women - the biggest problem in the world according to feminists - is men seeing women for what they are.
Feminists and women in general want you to see the girl twerking in her booty shorts on Thursday in the club and think "boy I bet she's deep. I wonder what kind of music she likes, I wonder what her dreams and aspirations are. I wonder how I can help her, how I can be there for her, how I can get to know the "real her" beneath the appearance that she puts out."
And they justify this by saying "well, WOMEN look beneath the surface. We look at personality!"
Which is true, they do. They look at your wallet, your car, your crib, your confidence, your demeanor, etc, all the "tells" of your SMV. This gives them a sense of superiority, but in reality, it's this simple - we look at SMV, they look at SMV.
Men are objects with certain properties. SMV is a composite of these properties that women care about. Women are the same - they are objects that have different properties, and the properties we care might change depending on who we are and what we are looking. But at the end of the day, the most important property is attractiveness. High SMV for women is surface level; it's appearance.
Why Should I Objectify Women! I Like My Fantasies!
As men, when you objectify something, you increase your ability to manage it. When you view her as the means to provide you with something, be in sex, companionship, social status, or whatever it is, you can quickly evaluate the key question of "Is this object delivering the 'something' that it's supposed to?"
How can you objectively evaluate her and get an accurate reading of her value, especially given how many tricks modern women have up their sleeve to over-hype their value? You must break her down into quantifiable categories and evaluate that ho like a D&D character. What are her skills? How would rank her femininity, her seductiveness, her appearance, her dress / makeup game, her conversational skills, her intelligence, her clinginess, her humor?
Then you have to rank how much those evaluations actually matter. Not just ranking her in different areas, but establishing which areas are actually important. IE if her intelligence is a 10, who gives a fuck if she's a plate! If her's a FWB, then maybe her humor and conversational skills matter somewhere in the middle; less important than appearance, but more important than her n-count or RMV.
My point is that this must be rationally broken down. Like when you're car shopping.
A car is an object. It provides transport, comfort, safety, mileage, and social status. If I'm buying an econoHonda, I'm looking for it to provide transport, safety, moderate comfort, decent mileage, reliability, and low insurance rates. If I'm going to pay around 8k for a used '08 Accord, I have a STANDARD to evaluate against; I know what I'm paying for the object, and I can evaluate if the object is providing me with sufficient value to justify the price.
If you guys think of women as objects, you can quickly ascertain whether or not they justify their price. Do drinks and dinners and gifts and TIME spent courting justify the object's sexual output of 1 fuck per week? Probably not unless you're so rich that you don't GAF, or you're so beta that there's no other way to wet your dick.
Now, if she's a sports car / turbo thot of an object, that means her functionality is very limited, but she's very good at one purpose, which is fucking. So what value do you place on sex with a turbo thot? Maybe instead of one-nighting her, you can justify plating. You put in a little more time and a little money on giving her a drink and a meal when she comes over for a booty call, and you have to spend some time listening to her stupid stories, but it's an OK price for the objective value that she's providing.
ThotMart Versus Walmart
When you think of girls as objects, you get RP'd in to another truth. At Walmart, the prices are fixed. Bill Gates, Kanye West, me, a college dropout, and a homeless dude all get quoted the same price for a big screen TV. Paying with a black Amex card or bands of coke-residue covered drug money is really the same to the vendor at the end of the day. The price is the same for the object regardless of who you are. (Some exceptions do occur, like athletes will get free Jordans and Beats, but just run with the metaphor).
At the ThotMart, what you pay is determined by your SMV and your RMV. Everyone pays a different price for a same object. The prices are as unfixed as in a Turkish bazaar - and women are as crafty as Istanbul vendors, believe me.
If you read my post on "The Female Hustle" you know I have a boner for quadrants, so here goes. Here's what the 4 archetypes of men pay when they enter ThotMart.
(aka broke, no social status, no ripped bod, no car, no game, etc). You get escorted out the store and perhaps reported for loitering on private property. You're the homeless dude that just walked into the Gucci store. You're not doing anything wrong by being there, you're not breaking the law, but it doesn't matter, you're presence there makes the store seem less prestigious.
If you've ever gone into a fancy store and felt the saleswoman kind of "edged you out" quickly, this is what happened. They know that their stock rises by having the store seem full of rich, attractive people. By having all these plebians in sweats and hanes T shirts shopping and trying on their clothes, taking their jewelry out the case, etc, they seem far less high end and exclusive. Then the actual rich people see that and they don't want to shop there, because it seems like a common experience for common people, even if the price tags are high.
As a low SMV, low RMV man, you just approaching her and trying to buy is embarrassing for her; it tanks her value and she's paranoid that the alpha males around are seeing that, and then they won't shop her.
AKA beta bucks. You're solid relationship value because you've got a good job, nice car, good lifestyle, stable, and sweet. You pay the highest price because your SMV is lower, and she knows you don't have sexual options. You have the ability to give her a LOT, so you have to pay a lot, and you will, because you don't see her as an object.
You are the ideal customer. You're the guy who walks into the BMW store and just wants something sporty, because he wants to look cool and not drive his econobox anymore. You don't care about comparing models, because all your life you've just wanted a BMW, you've just wanted to feel cool. You'll finance something beyond your means, not negotiate hard, get devalued on your trade-in, and walk off the lot feeling like hot shit (even though you're signed up for 5 years of leeching payments in return for something that will have it's novelty wear off after 1 year.)
Low SMV, high RMV guys are often the ones who protest that NAWALT, objectification is wrong, yadda yadda yadda. You are an object, that's all you are to her, and you want to tell me not to objectify women? Crazy.
High SMV, Low RMV:
You get the goods for free. You pay the low price because you have sexual options, therefore there's a price ceiling on what you'll pay for pussy. If you're going to get a free big screen TV tomorrow, and you know that, you're not paying sticker price today. There is really nothing else that needs to be said here; she is attracted and wants to fuck you because you're valuable in the sexual place, and she gets value by proxy. Not money, but excitement, social status, connections to other cool people, parties, drugs, whatever it is.
We all know this drill. She overdelivers on pussy, you underdeliver on commitment. Now, if you get soft and you actually try to catch feelings and go steady with her - aka you treat her like a human being and not an object - then she'll get flakey and start trying to reel in another guy. 10 times out of 10, if you catch her by being the alpha fun guy, and you get serious and weighty and boring, she will start hoing around mentally. She might not cheat then and there, she might stick with you some because you're still a decent object, but mentally she'll start the branch-swinging process and her respect for you will be gone. She'll start talking back, putting out less, and trying to juice you like you're a beta. Because, well, you went soft, so you are a beta.
My point is that women are always down to RE-NEGOTIATE THE TERMS OF THE DEAL if your SMV/RMV properties change value. If you are a different object tomorrow, they want a different deal. If you can pay more tomorrow, all of a sudden, the price changes. An alpha who ropes in a girl with low effort must always remain on his guard and understand that he only defeated her imperative TODAY; she will keep trying to win in the future.
High SMV / High RMV:
This is a negotiation, this is where it gets interesting. She will try to raise the price because she knows she hits the jackpot if she get commitment and time out of you. She wants you bad. She knows that girls who give it up to you for free walk away with nothing. But she also knows she can't try for too much, because you are high SMV and will walk.
It's your value versus hers, your negotiating ability versus hers. She's going to try to withhold sex, you're going to withhold commitment, and one of you will snap first. You can a high price or a low price, and this is where you have to be able to objectify her. If you are an "alpha bucks" but you buy into this Elon Musk fantasy that this ho is special, she's a unicorn, she's different, she's worth the extra cost even though she's structurally identical to every other object in her category, etc, you will be an alpha who's paying the BETA PRICE.
Alphas Paying the Beta Price
How many alphas do we know who pay the beta price? A SHIT TON.
Why do all these rich successful ballers and celebs and Ibankers and tech millionaires pay the beta price when they roll up to the ThotMart?
Because they don't get that she's just an object. They may sell, buy and trade objects for a living. They may have objectified countless women before - and of course been objectified by women before too. They may instinctively "get" RP ideas without having been explicitly exposed to them. They may have spend their lives underpaying for premium pussy.
And all of that doesn't mean shit if they cannot objectify women. Objectification of women is your masculine imperative. Especially if you are young and you have a bright future ahead of you - a future that any thot with a little jealousy or carelessness or manipulative instinct can compromise. Objectify. Reduce to a quantifiable, measurable object with different properties that you can rate, analyze, and assess in a vacuum.
If you aren't objectifying women, you are overvaluing them, and when you overvalue, you pay the beta price.
Repeat after me: "If I do not assess her with detached objectivity, I will wind up paying the beta price."
For some men, the fantasy of being with their soulmate is worth paying the beta price. And to them, as long as it's a calculated, rational decision, I have no beef.
But for most of us sane individuals, we want to minimize what we have to pay for sex. We want to see women as they are, even if it's uglier than seeing women as women want to be seen, or as WE want to see women. We do not want to OVERPAY for traits that our BP imagination has projected onto a average thot.
The way to avoid overpaying and giving your value for an illusion in return is objectification. It is no coincidence that feminists are SO hung up on objectification.
They know damn well that if men start objectifying women en masse, their whole charade of equality and victimhood comes crashing down. Once men as a population return to treating women like objects, women will be forced to improve and conserve the properties that men care about when evaluating them. Attractiveness, fitness, femininity, low n-count, and so on. In fact, an argument can be make that men's gradual shift away from objectifying women has led to many of our societal problems.
Help clean up society; objectify women when you walk into the ThotMart. It's your civic duty.