Yes and No.

About 15% of the world is currently of European ancestry depending on how you fudge the numbers and decide who to include. But there are other major ethnic groups like the Chinese that represent a block of about 20%.

In specific countries there are regions with high percentages of European ancestry, but those are limited to Europe and the United States. In America it's a Red State / Blue State issue where all the Europeans vote one way and all the non-Europeans vote another. Since 50 million people recently entered the United States most of these folks settled in Blue States. There is actually not all that much mixing of peoples. (despite what the media portrays)

So the question:

If Europeans are just another minority in the world why is there so much fuss about them?

Feminism seems hell bent to do just about everything possible to create a Fertility Negative environment for mostly European women and their unfortunate men. You don't see Feminism in most of the rest of the world, though birthrates are falling everywhere. Feminism seems a direct attack on the Europeans very Will to Live.

Men on Red Pill are now gleefully getting vasectomies in order to be able to live a life of pleasure without the baggage of children.

But if you look at our Will to Power we would all like to be Genghis Khan and spread our seed wildly and with abundance with huge harems of submissive females. Power is central to Red Pill thought.

How does one reconcile the large gap between the ideal (as represented by Genghis Khan) and the actual?

It's like the Last Termptation of Christ movie where rather than opting for his elimination on the cross he chooses to have a family.

What temptation would be required to convince a European to reproduce?

A submissive wife?

Laws that favored men?

...I'm trying to extract better ideas from Red Pill than:

"Yeah, the Feminists are impossible so I'm going to not reproduce."

It's hard to wrap my mind around that as a "winning philosophy".