Often one of the complaints from women about seduction in general is how open and pragmatic we are with our techniques. It's an extremely common issue with women in general. Naturally, in their emotionally dominated solipsistic worldview, this is odd to them -- when women talk about their problems, they just want to vent their emotions, when men talk about their problems they want to find solutions. Around here, we are extremely straightforward with what we do, so we can work together and give each other advice on what works, and what doesn't.
One of the other big disconnects is that women are less concerned with the "why" some things work, instead they care more about whether or not it works or not. A perfect example of this is any typical feminist subreddit around here. Culturally, every member is just about the same. They all have identical argument styles. They all attack specific arguments from the same direction, they all shame the same way, and they all know how to troll in the same manner that pisses people off the most. Now, do you think they all sat around one day and discussed how to say things and WHY it elicits X response? Of course not.
Instead, they just observe other's interactions and mimic what works. They don't care as to why it works, but they just know it does work. They'll follow a user that is good at what she does, see how she does it.
A few days back, I got to see this first hand. A group of women sitting around teaching each other game. From the outside, it just looked like chicks bitching about relationships and men in general. But when you followed it closely and read between the lines, they were all teaching each other how to game the men in their lives. Here are some paraphrased examples:
"My husband wanted go on a fishing trip with his friends this weekend. Can you believe that? He just assumed I would let him go so he bought the supplies and everything before asking me. I couldn't believe he thought this was okay. So I just reminded him that when he agreed to marry me, he also agreed to run everything he does by me, so we can make decisions together!" -- Translation: If your husband/SO ever tries to start trying to get some independence, you have to squash it immediately. One method of doing this is by shaming his status in the marriage.
"So Joe asked me to go out to X with him this weekend. He's so much fun and so hot!" "What about Steve? I thought we were all going to Y that weekend?" "Oh I'm not worried about that. I'm just going to tell him I want a girls night, and he'll understand I need my own time. Plus, he's a really good guy, he's not going to go anywhere." -- Translation: If you want to go out with an alpha and prevent your beta from getting upset, shame him for not giving you your independence. This way, if he protests, he comes off as the bad guy trying to oppress you.
"Mike just told me he wants an exclusive relationship. So I told him there is no way that's going to happen. I'm sorry, he's a good guy, but I just don't want a relationship with him right now. However, I really do like him, so I'm going to invite him over for dinner so he doesn't get too mad about it." -- Translation: When your beta boy wants to get serious you have to shut him down and set the tone of the frame. However, to keep him around as an orbiter, you need to give him more attention to make him think he still has a chance. But in the future if he ever gets upset about the relationship not moving forward and feeling strung along, you can always fall back on the fact that you've already made it very clear it wasn't going to happen.
Now I'm certain most women aren't consciously thinking they are teaching eachother game. However, I am confident most of them are saving this advice for the future. The only difference is that we openly talk about "why these strategies work" where women simply don't care about the why and deconstruct it's methodology. Now women are doing this ALL DAY when they are communicating each other -- subtly teaching each other successful ways to manage their relationships to maintain their position of privilege and power.
Again, I don't think this is intentional or malicious. It's perfectly fine to do whatever you can to get an edge in life. However, when women think they don't teach other successful ways to play the game, they are full of shit. Whenever they come to a seduction forum and say how pathetic it is that men are "being manipulative" to shame them back into their box, again, they are full of shit. They may not think they are playing this game, but they are. The only difference is they communicate it much more subtly than us on an emotional level. And if you confront them with this information, they'll just hamster about how it's so much more different, or how that never really happens. It does, it happens all the time.
[–][deleted] 23 points24 points25 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 11 points12 points13 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–] points points points | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]thewrightstuff8815 points16 points17 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]veggie_girl19 points20 points21 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]puaSenator[S] 25 points26 points27 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Thors_Cock1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]jakethesnake760 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MrsStrom5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]puaSenator[S] 11 points12 points13 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]averageredditor1232 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]jakethesnake762 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Hot_Biscuits_2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Modredpillschool5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Kernes0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]mister_zd2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]jacks10000 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mister_zd0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link