Let me start off by saying , as the title suggests and in my opinion, MRA is not and never has been a faction of the red pill philosophy. They can claim to be so , but I would disagree.

MRA was initially started by a bunch of male feminists. They woke from their slumber when the damage was already done.

But the conditioning doesn’t just go away like that. They are still egalitarians at heart and deal with male issues and modern gender dynamics in that fashion.

As a result MRA is a politically correct group which defeats the whole purpose. It defeats the purpose because in order to tackle the issues we first need to be honest which will end up offending people. They are politically correct hence they

A)use the word “feminist” in places they should be using the word “woman” to avoid a backlash.

B) propagate that feminism initially was a good idea (which is a lie) and only later on went rogue.

C) believe in gender equality when men and women aren’t the same.

And as a result due to the premise of the group is based on fallacies, MRA has been unsuccessful.

They totally don’t understand that female in group bias and male out group bias puts men at a disadvantage when trying to play fair.

The above can be proved with : women are wonderful effect

Basically MRAs need to please their female allies because they know only through female representation will make issues be taken seriously by the world.

They have the right idea in mind but the execution and reasoning behind that idea is awful.

The reason why I think they are more dangerous to men is because men will know all the blue pill narratives and steer clear of those , hence those ecosystems as dangerous as they are can be avoided. MRA on the other hand will look attractive to men , pulling them in , only to blue pill tem with a thin coating of pseudo red pill.