~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
rakiim
[–]FripiouJr. Hamster Analyst494 points495 points496 points 3 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link
There's no need to objectify women. They are perfectly willing to objectify themselves.
[–]FuckRedditsADMIN232 points233 points234 points 3 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link
growing up before the internet there was the cliche constant media bullshit narrative that "lads mags" or topless newspapers (UK thing) were "demeaning to women" as if it was some giant conspiracy of wealthy men forcing innocent girls to pose topless or fully nude.
what happens when you give women absolutely free choice to do as they wish with no restrictions or guiding them down a particular path, ala social media? they do porn and pose around in their underwear for attention.
[–]NuclearTheology108 points109 points110 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Instagram shows this all too well. How many women choose to aspire to be an “Instagram model” when other kinds of work exist?
[–]Tweapodok33132 points133 points134 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
The difference between Instagram modeling and other kinds of work is that other kinds of work are work.
[–]NinjasOwnTheNight36 points37 points38 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
A poet indeed.
[–]BuchwildSlaps Donkeys Ass: "Hell, you can swipe her all day long!"50 points51 points52 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Howard Stern and other multiple radio show regularly had girls come in and strip down just for a shout-out on the radio. At least a Playboy model gets a paycheck
[–]wathon2Sr. Hamster Analyst28 points29 points30 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
reddit alone has hundreds of NSFW subs.
[–]KaiserEspinoza32 points33 points34 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Since the advent of onlyfans they're basically just advertising now
[–]RoleplayPete12 points13 points14 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
What happens to the value of an item when it becomes so plentiful that there is no longer demand for it?
[–]42252252Sluts' Futile Heartthrob3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
But if you explain this they always seem to think they're rare, because I'm not like the other girls. There's only one of me, so I must have stratospheric value!
[–]wrtcdevrydy1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It increases price exponentially and the person or company producing it become millionaires.
[–]RoleplayPete4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It becomes absolutely worthless.
An apple salesman in an orange grove has a market.
An apple salesman in an apple orchard is wasting their time.
[–]throwaway4002761 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I don't think its that they necessarily automatically want to do it, there is a market for it and that market was filled, heavily, but still filled
[–]SalieriSendsHisRgds36 points37 points38 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Their logic:
Beta bux must respect women and worship their kweens
Alpha chads are free to objectify women and treat them as cum rags. And guess what, these women will blame beta bux for not taking them instead of alpha chad.
[–]Mundane_Worldliness7Sr. Hamster Analyst2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
👌🏾 Exactly, from the mouth of Chad, it isn’t really even objectification, it’s flirty and hawt and only expresses “his kindness and self confidence!”. However, Billy beta from accounting sending her a friend request on FB is overtly sexual and grounds for an HR complaint.
[–]onbakeplatinumSitting in the naughty chair until 25 Jan13 points14 points15 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The fact that girls are more likely to take tons of photos of themselves to post online proves that. The only photos of myself I have are showing my body armor (which isn't even online) and my professional LinkedIn photo.
[–]Dean_CleanGiving out the serpent of love's anti-venom11 points12 points13 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Classic projection of women onto men. Women have been bitching about being objectified by men for as long as I can remember, but 1. Women objectify men alot. 2. Women objectify themselves (as Fripiou eloquently said) and one another way more than I've ever seen men objectify women.
Women project alot of their issues on everyone else and once you know that, it's alot easier to navigate the bull$hit.
[–]Doge_Is_Dead2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
This message has been approved by Patrice O'neal
[–]thawest2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Black phillip!
[–]Old_snowboarder151 points152 points153 points 3 years ago (28 children) | Copy Link
You know why guys only want you for your body? Because some men prefer to use women as a masturbatory device rather than a fleshlight although to be honest a fleshlight would work out way less expensive in the long run.
[–]x-typo53 points54 points55 points 3 years ago* (13 children) | Copy Link
Feminists at its finest...
[–]FuckRedditsADMIN25 points26 points27 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
not anywhere near fat and ugly enough for FDS.
[–]WatermelonBarrel9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
What’s FDS? Results from google didn’t make much sense in this context
[–]x-typo24 points25 points26 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
It's a sub called Female Dating Strategy. Enter at your own risk....
[–]WatermelonBarrel14 points15 points16 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Haha thanks that makes so much more sense than “first date sex” from urban dictionary
[–]happychickenpalaceJr. Hamster Analyst18 points19 points20 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
FDS also revolves around the issue of first date sex. Basically they advise women to sex on the first date with hot assholes, but stay chaste with boring provider types.
If you are not relationship material, you will get laid. Such is the stupidity of clown world dating.
[–]x-typo0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Exactly.... hence the reason why “monkey branching” exists in the first place...
[–]forgeboy76-4 points-3 points-2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I Got banned from FDS because of a member of this group. WTF? Well I really didn’t get Butt hurt about it .....
[–]wbhwoodway9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
And yet you posted 3 times about it. Maybe you got just a little butt hurt?
[+][deleted] 3 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]forgeboy761 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Nope I just thought it was funny
[–]happychickenpalaceJr. Hamster Analyst44 points45 points46 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You know why guys only want you for your body?
Because guys don't want anything else about you.
[–]newtomtl8332 points33 points34 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Also, a fleshlight doesn't have shitty taste in movies.
[–]Mundane_Worldliness7Sr. Hamster Analyst17 points18 points19 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Exactly, their attitude facilitates their easy use, convincing women they can fuck like us has been a bonanza.
[–]TheRiverInEgypt9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
a fleshlight would work out way less expensive in the long run.
Clearly you’re not well versed in economics & TCoO (total cost of ownership) modeling best practices...
The fleshlight intially appears cheaper because it subsidizes it apparent cost & disguises its TCoO by offloading costs on to the user.
Since the user subsequently devalues their labor & so doesn’t include a market valuation of the added unpaid labor which it requires.
As you may be aware, a woman usually has a self-cleaning feature but a flesh light doesn’t.
So I n order to adequately compare the true cost of ownership between options you would need to determine the market rate to hire someone to perform the routine cleaning of said fleshlight.
While I’m not presently aware of how much you would have to pay someone to clean your fleshlight regularly or at least between uses, I can’t imagine someone would agree to compensation unless it was much higher than minimum wage.
From what I’ve seen, if one is careful, there are plenty of women in the market who similarly undervalue this same labor & even advertise their services at rates far below what a correctly functioning market would.
[–]General-Rommel7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I'm assuming due to your username, you're clearly in denial.
[–]BluepillProfessorMRP Mod4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Hey Rommel, before that joke I never laughed. But after that joke, I never stopped laughing.
That's a smart joke right there guys! Just a little El Alamein humor for the general.
[–]_-resonance-_2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Anyone downvoting this clearly is not a golfer.
[–]TheRiverInEgypt0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The only time Golf makes any sense to me or that I wouldn’t enjoy my time more if I left the left clubs behind & just strolled the length of the course is when I’m drunk.
Not tipsy, not a little buzzed but drunk - I mean 4th day of an insomniatic bourbon fueled bender of the sort that history has shown to be absolute proof that the “post hoc ergo propter hoc” fallacy simply does not apply to legislation.
In that state:
*Golf is the best thing ever...”
It is literally the best way to spend a few hours & a handle of whiskey - drunk me can imagine.
But seeing as the intersection of myself, bourbon & clubs (we won’t even discuss the ramifications of introducing a golf cart-) reliably results in deeply offending the sensibilities of the proper sorts & bewildering police officers who never imagined you could in fact do that with a Llama...
So prudence & decency obligates me to reserve my enjoyment of the sport to non-extradition countries...
[–]BluepillProfessorMRP Mod2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I’m not presently aware of how much you would have to pay someone to clean your fleshlight regularly
Let me make you aware.
The going rate is 1/2 your income, the kids, both cars, and the house, plus alimony, and child support.
Unfortunately there is no guarantee it will even clean itself much less be available for you to use.
Again, this is a failure to understand the lessons of TCoO & as a result, a failure to choose or apply best practices.
When you correctly understand the various economic functions which impact the actual cost of obtaining the desired function.
When you can correctly evaluate TCoO, it allows you to understand the full price & cost structure of obtaining & maintaining the desired functionality.
Specifically in this case, the common misunderstanding of the difference between an asset & a liability.
An asset appreciates in value over time, a liability depreciates - one should never invest capital into something which depreciates in value.
To put it another way:
“If it flies, floats or fucks - lease don’t buy...”
[–]Old_snowboarder1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
My friend, you are not well versed in 'opportunity cost' - if I spend an hour talking to a woman then that's an hour of my life I could have been doing something else with.
[–]TheRiverInEgypt-1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Actually, "Opportunity Cost" is one of the many factors which are included in the TCoO process & by itself, OC is a fairly weak process by which to make an optimized economic decision.
When calculating the complete TCoO for any purchase, you must not only consider the opportunity cost, but also the acquisition cost, the depreciation cost, the maintenance costs, to just name a few of the factors necessary to determine what the "True Price" is & therefore not only what you should pay for it but also the terms under which such an acquisition are most optimally conducted.
Whereas when you only consider the OC as you have done in the provided example, you are likely to make critical errors, as you did by incorrectly linking price of a product with the terms under which it is being offered.
If you buy any product, it will have an opportunity cost associated with it. If I buy a TV today, not only am I denying myself the opportunity to spend those dollars on something else, I’m also committing myself to not buying another TV (until I’ve obtained my desired return on the dollars I spent on it).
The problem in your example is that you are permitting a vendor to bundle undesired services in with desired ones & as a result are acquiring the product under unfavorable terms.
A great example of this is Cable TV (incidentally, a service I have never subscribed to) - the provider inflates the cost of the subscription by forcing you to purchase all the channels instead of just the channels you want to watch. In the case of the Cable company, they have (or had, it is now somewhat limited) monopoly power as historically you have only had one choice if you wanted any of those services so they could dictate both price & terms.
Which as an interesting side note - that monopoly power has allowed them to remain extremely profitable, despite the nearly universal loathing by their customers for their practices when it comes to pricing, terms & service delivery
Now, as we’ve seen in recent years, internet streaming services have enabled many people to find a way around those monopolistic barriers & instead obtain the desired service on a free(r) market basis, at a lower price & on terms which are more favorable to them.
However, one must keep in mind, the common desire of any business to establish if not a monopoly, than at least customer lock-in because the more difficult or expensive it is for a customer to choose a different product, the more value they can extract from the same customer with less effort & less risk. Market participants are inherently lazy, they want to extract the most value from each transaction at the lowest cost - this applies to both vendors & purchasers equally.
TCoO is a series of tools to help a purchaser evaluate all of the costs of a purchase to make a fully informed decision as to both the price & the terms under which it makes the most sense to acquire a given product. You cannot separate the product, price & terms when making a purchasing decision.
From the vendors perspective, it makes sense to attempt to limit or hinder your ability to access the free market (& thereby free market pricing) & thereby limit the ability of their competitors to impact their pricing & service offerings.
However, in the market segment under discussion, the problem is that you have mistakenly failed to examine the vendors marketing claims & are accepting their assertion that their product is a “unique value product” without examination & as a result tried to convince you to agree to unfavorable terms to acquire their product - instead of realizing that it is a commodity, & insisting on purchasing it on those terms.
The entire concept of a "unique value" product is that it provides better value for the purchaser's money than a commoditized product by including features, qualities or services which cannot be acquired elsewhere. While this can be true, logical application of either reason or economic would require that it be treated as claim which requires examination & supporting evidence before being accepted.
As"Caveat Emptor" demonstrates, this has & will always be a burden which is borne by the purchaser not the vendor.
Every vendor of every product in the world wants you to believe that their product represents a unique value that you can only get by obtaining that product through them. If you are foolish enough to accept that at face value instead of requiring them to compete for your services, it is you who has failed as a customer to negotiate to your best interest, not the vendor who has failed to price their product.
Does that mean that it will require more time & effort to source the product you want - at the terms & price you want to pay?
Absolutely, this is why companies have entire purchasing departments who are constantly reevaluating market conditions & vendor terms to ensure they are extracting the desired value from their purchasing decisions.
This is also why companies have to hire & pay sales people to constantly seek new customers & ensure the continued engagement of their current customers.
Another part of TCoO (which in this specific market tends to be dramatically overstated by the purchaser) is the cost of acquisition but this again is a result of a purchaser mistaking a commodity good for a unique value product; when any rational economic analysis can only conclude that not only is it a commodity but it is & a commodity with transitory & generally depreciating value.
As such the following TCoO best practices would allow the rational economic actor to both recognize the faulty acquisition model being offered by the vendor & instead seek out better terms & value from an alternate vendor.
For myself, spending an hour talking with a beautiful woman can be a delight. It can also be a nightmare, it entirely depends on the content of the conversation & the degree that your are free to choose to engage in the former, & avoid the latter. However, by failing to perform an adequate TCoO analysis, men commonly agree to acquire the product without carefully calculating the value, price & terms of what they are seeking to acquire.
Far too often, when making romantic acquisitions both Men & Women tend to wrongly consider something that is clearly a commodity product as having the properties & value of a "Unique Value Product" which leads to absolutely terrible decisions; as well as a great deal of frustration & dissatisfaction for all involved.
In the end however, it call all be reduced to simply never agreeing to acquire a product without a full determination of the value, price & terms so that you are not surprised by the TCoO during the expected life of the transaction.
[–]poloppoyopEasily triggered retard0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
You could also buy them to use only one time. It may still cost you less than sex with a woman depending on your looks.
You could also buy them to use only one time.
That one could, but that would further reduce rather than improve the overall TCoO ratio between the two products.
It may still cost you less than sex with a woman
In my observation, the price of sex has never been lower, in fact if you go into any public area in our society you will literally be surrounded by people trying desperately to give it away.
The problem is not with the price of sex, the problem is with the terms which many vendor wish to attach to the transaction.
What you are referring to as the "cost of sex" is actually not the market price of sex, but rather it is the price you must pay to have sex without the attachment of those terms.
In any commercial transaction (and sex is no different) price & terms work in tandem - the higher the price, the more generous the terms, the lower the price, the more stringent the terms. The lower the price, the more you have to reduce your terms & vice versa...
If you want to have sex entirely on your terms (say with an absolutely gorgeous woman who will fulfill all of your sexual fantasies & leave afterwards with zero expectations from you) there are plenty of vendors who will sell it to you on those terms, but the price is $15,000 per night in cash upfront.
If you want to pay nothing for sex, there are plenty of vendors who won't charge you a penny, but then they get to determine all of the terms, and in many cases, you may not quality to receive those terms because each vendor has their own criteria under which they determine both the price & the terms they are willing to offer.
Now, in my experience, "free" is the most expensive word in any language & that is perhaps nowhere more true than in this market segment.
Think of it like any other retail transaction:
When you fixate on the price & ignore the terms, you are failing on the most basic level to appropriately negotiate your side of the transaction.
depending on your looks.
Or the looks of the woman...
[+][deleted] 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]FuckRedditsADMIN46 points47 points48 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
it really is fucking hilarious how blatant it is and hence how stupid she is
[–]silly_birbJr. Hamster Analyst79 points80 points81 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's sad how stereotypical she is
[–]mustangfrankSlick Willy peddlin' a broken hamster wheel42 points43 points44 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The rationalization hamster is a legendary creature dwelling deep in the minds of the self-delusional, and is particularly common among young liberal women. From birth, the rationalization hamster enters a symbiotic relation with its host, whereby whenever the host feels a craving to do something completely insane and malicious that will have horrible consequences for everyone in the long run, the rationalization hamster will jump on its wheel and run really, really fast, getting the magical hamster wheel to spin out a long sheet of paper full of neat rationalizations for the ultimately devastating action.
Rationalization hamsters are thought to be a key component in producing liberal scholarly works, particularly those of feminism. Young, liberated women often rely on it to explain their attraction to the asshole who is going to pump and dump them, as well as their contempt for the nice guy who, unaware of the hamster within, strives fruitlessly to gain their true love. Older, liberated women also rely on it for dumping their husbands and using the resulting child support money on jewellery, cars and/or crack.
[–]happychickenpalaceJr. Hamster Analyst41 points42 points43 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Acts like a slut
Complains that she attracts mansluts.
[–]PorphyrogennetosJr. Hamster Analyst40 points41 points42 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Why does every guy just want me for my body
"Your pussy is all I want, if that's all you got."
[–]PunkOverLord19 points20 points21 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Rest in piece you absolute legend.
Thanks for the quote. He always had the most spot on shit to say.
[–]mustangfrankSlick Willy peddlin' a broken hamster wheel30 points31 points32 points 3 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
Why does every guy just want me for my body?
Me: Are you looking for good men, or fuck bois?
[–]LaLa_Land54316 points17 points18 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Answer: because the girls he settles down with aren’t posting about sex and dildoes on the internet
[–]MeaningfulMan6923 points24 points25 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It’s insane to me how fucking stupid this chick (and others like her are). Do they have the memory of a disabled goldfish and genuinely don’t remember posting the first two before the third one, or are they just legitimately that fucking dumb that they can’t notice the irony/hypocrisy. Either way is just so sad hahaha I can’t even begin on this one
[–]road_laya8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
They have been bailed out their entire life, why would they.
[–][deleted] 23 points24 points25 points 3 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
I get the genuine feeling that women absolutely hate men. Women seem to display utter contempt for 99.9999999% of men.
[–]FuckRedditsADMIN22 points23 points24 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
its jealousy, all women grow up in the shadow of men, its men who made the world, its men who created civilisation, its men who have made or invented or discovered anything of significant interest in this world, women know this, they hate this.
women know that mens best is always the worlds best, and women's best never is, and never will be.
[–]upsidedownbackwardsI like a nithe rathberry thpritzther8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Friend just got divorced and his ex keeps trying to call him over to be her handyman (for free) because new guy is useless at stuff like that and as FEMALE, PROUD AND POWERFUL as she is no way she's getting on a ladder to use a cordless drill. I'm 100% sure can physically do it, but there's something mentally that puts it below them.
[–]FuckRedditsADMIN7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I hope he tells her to go fuck herself, if not he is a massive chump.
[–]upsidedownbackwardsI like a nithe rathberry thpritzther8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I'm working on un-chumping him. He's already frustrated with "I'M A 40 YEAR OLD MOTHER OF TWO AND HERE ARE MY DEMANDS" on every dating/hookup site he tries.
She left him to empty/clean their entire shared rental house all by himself because "her boyfriend stayed the night and she had to make him breakfast", so she's rubbing salt in the wound and redpilling him far faster than I ever could.
[–]FuckRedditsADMIN6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
thank god it was a rental house though, rather than losing half a real house to this bitch.
he needs to be fucking ruthless though in his response to her, no wiggle room no justifying why you cant do anything, just a simple "No fuck off" (assuming he is now divorced) to his ex.
[–]BlogginginvicecitySr. Hamster Analyst1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
I'm 100% sure can physically do it, but there's something mentally that puts it below them.
Performative femininity. If she can't get a man to do something for her, it's an old instinctual signal that she is in danger. Maintaining some control over the stronger folks is very important to the weak.
[–]KingRobotPrinceSluts Forbidden Fruit11 points12 points13 points 3 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
It's because a lot of them are so messed up that the men they find attractive are utter garbage who treat them like dirt while men who are loving and supportive are repulsive to them. It even gets to the point where they take out their anger at how they have let garbage men treat them on any mild mannered or of non-aggressive man they encounter.
These types of women probably actually have a mental illness caused by past trauma, but women have it so easy they're just allowed to go about their business. A man would never be able to be functional at the same level of mental damage because so much more is expected from them.
I guess the male equivalent would be only being attracted to women who are massive sluts, incredibly selfish, drama-prone, and guaranteed to cheat on you, while women who care for you, support you and want to raise your children would be super off-putting.
I can't say I envy them, but they bring it upon themselves.
[–]BlogginginvicecitySr. Hamster Analyst1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Very well put. IMHO, the addiction to instability is related to escapist tendencies. Keeping one's third eye off one's self takes precedent.
[–]BluepillProfessorMRP Mod2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No it's about 80% of men to whom they show utter contempt. 15% of men who they merely disrespect (i.e. shit test) and 5% who are not treated with utter contempt (at least not right away).
[–]Lord_Kano20 points21 points22 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I have a couple of cousins who are constantly posting sexual content on Social Media and complaining about the men trying to fuck them.
I said the same thing to both of them...
If you're constantly talking about how good your water is, you can't complain when a thirsty man tries to get a drink.
[–]houseoftolstoyUnchivalrous Christian17 points18 points19 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
why does every guy just want me for my body
Offer more than your body then. There is a reason those like me say that women should not be sluts. But still they insist that there is "nothing wrong" despite their cycles of hedonism and unhappiness.
[–]Martellus73215 points16 points17 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
You all realize they never think of using using rechargeable batteries....gotta keep those kids in chains mining the lithium and other toxic minerals while the slave laborers in china are kept busy building sex toys.
[–]road_laya5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's mainly the rechargable batteries that use lithium. "Kids in lithium mines" is more an argument against rechargable batteries, not for.
[–]Deadwitch11 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah! Wait...what?
[–]atelitus15 points16 points17 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
If she were actually funny, interesting, or pleasant to be around, she might keep a few.
If literally no man wants to associate with you outside the bedroom, odds are it's you not them.
[–]ClutchNes15 points16 points17 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Meanwhile I am the only one exploiting my body.... FOR MASSIVE GAINZ BABY! ALL KINDZ OF GAINZ, ALL KINDZ!
[–]Miserable-Lemon13 points14 points15 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Women objectify themselves constantly.
[–]Pimp87Pumped up for the Pussy Carnival7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
They always do things that damage them and then they always ask that common question.. WAATGMG
[–]NK3056 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
She will turn any man insane
[–]TheExist3r6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
These people are plain trash, later they'll set thier body count to 0 becauase they had no "real" orgasms, and the cringey comments follow
"Preach🙌"
"U is da queen"
"LOUDER FOR THOSE AT BACK"
"OMG IM A VIRGIN IG"
[–]onbakeplatinumSitting in the naughty chair until 25 Jan6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Imagine taking smug photos of yourself and adding arrogant text to post online. I can't imagine myself doing such a thing. The only photo of me online is my LinkedIn professional photo that no one looks at.
[–]moralbank3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Narcissism at its finest
[–]hasorand0m5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]BlogginginvicecitySr. Hamster Analyst0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's hard for her to see what she looks like when her head is up her butt
[–]pt54 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
1st & 2nd frames should be switched
[–]evergreen353 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
"I want to be loved"... Ladies: You need to be LOVE-ABLE in order to be loved.
Being kind, sweet and not so fucking self-centered also helps.
[–]0mrcynic0White "Supreme" Knight4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Acts and dresses like a slut but doesn't want to be associated as one. "Just because I'm wearing this dress doesn't mean I'm a slut."
Yeah, but you definitely look like one.
[–]BluepillProfessorMRP Mod1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
If you're not a slut then why are you wearing the uniform?
[–]Not_jeff__3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Is it bad to not want a woman with more than like 7 sexual partners? Apparently I’m the asshole if I don’t want spoiled pussy
[–]KingRobotPrinceSluts Forbidden Fruit6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
If the woman you're discussing it with has no preferences in terms of character, power or wealth, I can see why they might have an issue with it. If they state that they want a successful career man, then they can fuck right off if they have an issue with you wanting as few sexual partners as possible. (This goes double if you're a guy that's sexually conservative. I.e. if I've never had a ONS/hookup/FWB and think they're gross, I should be able to want the same in any woman I consider having a relationship with.)
Women want different things from men than men want from women. If they can't accept that, then that's already a fairly big red flag.
[–]Not_jeff__4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I’m not speaking about anyone specific but I will never date anyone with a relatively high amount of sexual partners. I’m not the type to have a ONS either, I’m actually demisexual so I only find someone attractive thru their personality and if it matches mine so having more partners indicates that they aren’t REALLY compatible with me, only a small amount. I don’t think it makes me an ass for wanting someone like me.
I think people are attempting to coerce you into buying what they're selling.
[–]ONEJOHNSON3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Act a whore, be treated as a whore. Act a fool, be treated as a fool. Act derogatory and borderline sociopathic in the objectifying way you view men, be treated as an object.
Hoes always expect preferential/hypocritical treatment by virtue of their gender..
[–]asdf333azasenior deluge-style poster2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Can't wait to see this generation of girls age out into their 30s and 40s. These women are so used to being drowned on attention thx to social media. They won't know what to do once their looks fade.
[–]DanielLaRussoJohny1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
And a fleshlight will function longer than her p*ssy ever will
[–]deon101 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
🤢
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That 1000 cock stare... you can see she's having flashbacks.
Probably got PTSD from all the monster BBC
[–]sensual_predditor1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
i literally laughed out loud, fuckin' A man
[–]Optyck481 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
she wants to be loved ,her vibrator can love her now.
[–]pickles-n-noodles0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Woman: objectifies and sexualizes her entire existence and identity
Also woman: I just don’t understand why men only want me for my BODY.. I just want to be LOVED.
[–]yomo860 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Had couple of girls like her. The only thing you could want her for as a sane man is her body.
© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]FripiouJr. Hamster Analyst494 points495 points496 points (20 children) | Copy Link
[–]FuckRedditsADMIN232 points233 points234 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]NuclearTheology108 points109 points110 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Tweapodok33132 points133 points134 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]NinjasOwnTheNight36 points37 points38 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BuchwildSlaps Donkeys Ass: "Hell, you can swipe her all day long!"50 points51 points52 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]wathon2Sr. Hamster Analyst28 points29 points30 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]KaiserEspinoza32 points33 points34 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]RoleplayPete12 points13 points14 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]42252252Sluts' Futile Heartthrob3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]wrtcdevrydy1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]RoleplayPete4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]throwaway4002761 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SalieriSendsHisRgds36 points37 points38 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Mundane_Worldliness7Sr. Hamster Analyst2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]onbakeplatinumSitting in the naughty chair until 25 Jan13 points14 points15 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Dean_CleanGiving out the serpent of love's anti-venom11 points12 points13 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Doge_Is_Dead2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]thawest2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Old_snowboarder151 points152 points153 points (28 children) | Copy Link
[–]x-typo53 points54 points55 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]FuckRedditsADMIN25 points26 points27 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]WatermelonBarrel9 points10 points11 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]x-typo24 points25 points26 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]WatermelonBarrel14 points15 points16 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]happychickenpalaceJr. Hamster Analyst18 points19 points20 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]x-typo0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]forgeboy76-4 points-3 points-2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]wbhwoodway9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]forgeboy761 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]happychickenpalaceJr. Hamster Analyst44 points45 points46 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]newtomtl8332 points33 points34 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mundane_Worldliness7Sr. Hamster Analyst17 points18 points19 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheRiverInEgypt9 points10 points11 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]General-Rommel7 points8 points9 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]BluepillProfessorMRP Mod4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]_-resonance-_2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]TheRiverInEgypt0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BluepillProfessorMRP Mod2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]TheRiverInEgypt0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Old_snowboarder1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]TheRiverInEgypt-1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]poloppoyopEasily triggered retard0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]TheRiverInEgypt0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]FuckRedditsADMIN46 points47 points48 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]silly_birbJr. Hamster Analyst79 points80 points81 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mustangfrankSlick Willy peddlin' a broken hamster wheel42 points43 points44 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]happychickenpalaceJr. Hamster Analyst41 points42 points43 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PorphyrogennetosJr. Hamster Analyst40 points41 points42 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]PunkOverLord19 points20 points21 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mustangfrankSlick Willy peddlin' a broken hamster wheel30 points31 points32 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]LaLa_Land54316 points17 points18 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MeaningfulMan6923 points24 points25 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]road_laya8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 23 points24 points25 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]FuckRedditsADMIN22 points23 points24 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]upsidedownbackwardsI like a nithe rathberry thpritzther8 points9 points10 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]FuckRedditsADMIN7 points8 points9 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]upsidedownbackwardsI like a nithe rathberry thpritzther8 points9 points10 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]FuckRedditsADMIN6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BlogginginvicecitySr. Hamster Analyst1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]KingRobotPrinceSluts Forbidden Fruit11 points12 points13 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]BlogginginvicecitySr. Hamster Analyst1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BluepillProfessorMRP Mod2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lord_Kano20 points21 points22 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]houseoftolstoyUnchivalrous Christian17 points18 points19 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Martellus73215 points16 points17 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]road_laya5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Deadwitch11 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]atelitus15 points16 points17 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ClutchNes15 points16 points17 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Miserable-Lemon13 points14 points15 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Pimp87Pumped up for the Pussy Carnival7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NK3056 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheExist3r6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]onbakeplatinumSitting in the naughty chair until 25 Jan6 points7 points8 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]moralbank3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]hasorand0m5 points6 points7 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]BlogginginvicecitySr. Hamster Analyst0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]pt54 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]evergreen353 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]0mrcynic0White "Supreme" Knight4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]BluepillProfessorMRP Mod1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Not_jeff__3 points4 points5 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]KingRobotPrinceSluts Forbidden Fruit6 points7 points8 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Not_jeff__4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BlogginginvicecitySr. Hamster Analyst1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ONEJOHNSON3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]asdf333azasenior deluge-style poster2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DanielLaRussoJohny1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]deon101 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]sensual_predditor1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Optyck481 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]pickles-n-noodles0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]yomo860 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link