I had my LTRs mother ask me what I thought about Alabama's new laws the other day, and after agreeing with it, obviously went into a very long argument (I know, never get into this shit with women, but she's chill). She did the obvious nay-saying and "it's my choice". The next night, we had her bf over for dinner, and he asks the same thing. Both me and LTR mother laugh about the argument we had just had the night before over it. He then begins to nay-say my thoughts again, blue pilled as he is. I was just wondering if you guys could see any holes in my argument:

A pregnant woman will see one of two options; if she doesn't want the baby because she wants to continue to fuck Chads: "It's MY baby, therefore, MY choice." If she wants to try to lock Chad down and steal his money for the next 20 years: "It's YOUR baby, and YOU need to STEP UP, MAN UP, AND TAKE RESPONSIBILITY.".

We can see the logical fallacy right off the start; cognitive dissonance. "Rules for thee, but not for me". Schrodinger's baby until SHE makes a decision.

We can also take both those arguments further into what they are REALLY saying: "I am a child who cannot be trusted to make good decisions, and in neither of the above cases should I be held responsible for my own actions."

To which the obvious next question is, "Then how the fuck can you be trusted to make either one of those decisions yourself to begin with?" In both cases the woman is ADMITTING that she makes poor decisions but should not be held responsible, in which case, why do we have children in our government? Why are we allowing children who can't be trusted to make good decisions to vote? Make high level business decisions?

To my mind, their OWN ARGUMENT places them back in the kitchen, right back where they started.

Now, my LTRs mother is smart and hard working but not HIGHLY intelligent, which I noticed by her lack of ability to address any of my arguments directly, and just swiftly ignored them and basically said "but meh equalisms". I was just wondering from you guys, if there IS an argument against this train of thought that you can see?

Now I personally know that the above statements are 100% true, that they are in fact very much children, but the way I was framing it (because I'm not going to flat out say that to my LTR OR her mother XD), was to show that this is THEIR argument, and that my own personal beliefs are that I should be able to see a woman as a smart, strong, capable and responsible adult, not a child.