~ archived since 2018 ~

Is the beauty standards a social construct? In the middle ages fat women were desirable

September 4, 2020
2 upvotes

I'm writing an essay and can't find anything non liberal in the internet...

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/askTRP.

/r/askTRP archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Title Is the beauty standards a social construct? In the middle ages fat women were desirable
Author ForeverInYou
Upvotes 2
Comments 6
Date September 4, 2020 2:04 AM UTC (2 years ago)
Subreddit /r/askTRP
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/askTRP/is-the-beauty-standards-a-social-construct-in-the.174247
https://theredarchive.com/post/174247
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/asktrp/comments/im78ac/is_the_beauty_standards_a_social_construct_in_the/
Red Pill terms in post
Comments

[–]Atomz009 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Scarcity of food would be my guess.

In North Korea at the moment, being overweight is a sign of status. Cause the rest of those poor bastards are starving.

[–]RAGNAR_GZ5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Alright so say I’m an average chick in say the Frankish Empire. Everything I eat I probably have to grow, or trade with others to get right?

So 21 year old Stacy is only getting a nice plump ass if Billy and Steve her brother and dad have a good growing season and the livestock are healthy.

If you had curves, you were doing well. Now it’s easy to get fat, right? Stacy need only to headeth to the local Walmart and fill up on sour cream and onion Pringle’s. I’d say that’s caused a shift in standards of beauty body wise.

Other then that, rich men marry hot women, that in turn have hot daughters. Always been that way, always will be that way.

[–]Protocol_Apollo2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Beauty is quite objective ( not fully).

Symmetry is a mathematical function. We find symmetrical faces more attractive.

Hip/waist ratio: 0.7. Hourglass figure.

Male v ratio: 1.7

Hell, even height selection is objective.

You only find 7’0 women unappealing because subconsciously your mind has figured out, via mean/mode, what a NORMAL (mathematical function) female height is.

[–]Trp27272720 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

1.7 seems mightily low for the ideal Male V ratio

What exactly is it referring to?

Shoulder to waist? Chest to waist? Shoulder to hips?

[–]boy_named_su0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

/ r / blackpillscience / top?t=all

beauty is objective

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2022. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter