Isn't this the age-old naturalistic fallacy?

It's in male nature to spread our seed to every attractive girl we see, but that doesn't make it ok for us to go around raping girls and cheating on our LTR.

It's in male nature to use violence against men that try and advance on our mate, but it is illegal to be violent, and rightfully so. If you look at gorillas, the alphamale uses violence against the other males and takes the female for himself by force. none of this is acceptable in civil society, natural or not, and would not be used as an excuse for such behaviour. it's expected that we can look past our nature and not do this stuff.

Why is it, then, that when women practice immoral behaviour such as monkey branching, golddigging, or set hypocritically high standards on men, it's seen as ok because "well it's just their nature, nothing anyone can do about it." (also a lot of the things people excuse as 'female nature' I think is generalising and often times isn't actually female nature for the most part)

It's as if we're all treating women as children that can't be held responsible for their bad actions. Women are sentenced to less prison time for the exact same crime as her male counterpart. this is because as a society we don't hold them as accountable for their bad actions as men. I'm tired of this shit permeating society, and I see it in the red pill far too often.