Feminism & Women’s Logic
Illimitable Men | December 5, 2013 | by IM
-------------------------
Women are a huge fucking shit test for men because they make no sense,
at all, even to themselves. They have a tendency to act first and
rationalise later, women thrive fundamentally on spontaneity. Women
are the quintessential example of what constitutes irrationalism, poor
logic and a propensity to think with feelings rather than material
facts. It’s this fundamental lack of rationality that creates the
outward impression that women aren’t very credible people seeing as
generally speaking, there is little consistent reasoning to their
behaviours. Most women are not very self-aware, especially younger
women, they live in the moment, they are easily swayed and they jump
from one emotional impulse to the next.

THEY HATE to take responsibility, THEY HATE to admit to faults,
they’re so allergic to being wrong or being exposed in some negative
way that rather commonly they’ll emotionally lash out, either at you
or whoever is close by and seems like a suitable scapegoat in order to
cover their own asses, even when what is being said is either truthful
or reasonable. Women inherently value their own sense of well-being
above reality and truth, justice doesn’t factor into the
equation UNLESS SHE PERSONALLY FEELS INDIGNANT ABOUT THE DISPUTE AT
HAND.

Funnily enough, if you explained and presented to a woman her
illogical behaviour and circumspect decisions but instead of framing
it as being part of her own behaviour you instead told her they were
the actions of another woman, she’d concur with you that this
behaviour was wholly irrational. It’s when you apply those same
facts to her, she immediately begins to feel judged and then starts
shutting down, when you direct the truth at the woman involved she
can’t mentally handle the manifestation of her own inadequacy, it
makes her feel uneasy and she will do anything to escape that
sensation, so what does she do? Out of mental self-preservation she
dissociates from reality and rejects the truth using flawed reasoning
and stubbornness to alleviate her discomfort.

Feminism does not have a strong logical basis, its followers are
typically not rational in nature, advocates of feminism have pavlovs
dog type responses to anti-feminism, or, if that word offends one’s
sensibilities, we can call it “a systematic critique of feminisms
weaknesses” or “the negative effects of feminism” simply put, as
far as feminists are concerned, the ideology they choose to identify
with most strongly and live their life by can do no wrong, it
delivered the poor women to salvation where once they were
traumatically and mercilessly oppressed by the cold calculating hands
of a vindictive sociopathic patriarchy!!!…. yeah right.

This kind of thinking is incredibly synonymous with the close-minded
sentiment that religious extremists and devout followers express, a
lack of impartiality, be it due to a lack of ability or simply a lack
of desire to see objectively both the strengths and weaknesses of
something, because that something is something they hold dear to them,
something they personally identify with on a deeper level, and to
shatter that perception is to shatter a part of who they are –
something that deeply troubles them. That’s why feminism thrives, to
its followers it can do no wrong – it is the apple of their eye as
it is nestled comfortably in the core of what comprises their sense of
self.

An example of this is a piece I wrote about the negative effects that
feminism has had on the family unit
[http://illimitablemen.com/2013/11/25/the-destruction-of-family-and-other-liberating-legacies-we-can-thank-feminist-social-engineering-for/],
I looked at how feminism directly contributes to messing up children,
increasing a child’s chances of living in poverty, increasing a
child’s chances of committing crime and even how feminism and its
effect on the family unit affects the educational attainment of
children from single parent families, however the women and men which
adhere to feminism simply don’t care about these harsh realities,
even with the statistics, studies and journals to back it up. Do you
know how these people can insanely ignore such perversity despite
claiming to be all about social justice? Because they’re not using
logic or reason.

Their entire argument/point of view is emotional and subjective by its
very nature. “_Women were always oppressed therefore –
feminism!_” “_we need feminism because women are equal to men but
unequal without it_” this is quite ironic as this basically
translates into logical talk as: women are inferior to men and need a
government sanctioned ideology to achieve a perverse form of equality
which redistributes privilege and wealth to women but frames this
redistribution of social privilege and resource management as
_“independence.”_ If you tell feminists about the inequality men
experience, they bigotedly disregard it, if this woman is even
remotely representative of what constitutes a modern-day feminist
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvYyGTmcP80] you can see that they
tend to have an obnoxiously elitist disregard for MRAs and give no
fucks at all about mens inherent lack of rights/privileges in
important areas of modern-day society.

Typically a feminist will address any form of male experienced
inequality with dissatisfaction or disbelief, disregarding it with
some idiotic statement such as: “well that’s not as bad as getting
raped” as if they’re under this incredible sense of perverted
delusion that you can justify an inequality by saying there’s a
worser type of crime/inequality out there and therefore, hey, fuck
this other type of inequality because it’s not the worst one in
existence! It’s horrendous reasoning, truly; and this silly
fallacious logic has even reached the family courts, to the point
where a man can be arrested for a woman’s change of mind.

EXAMPLE: I was in court in my country (England) the other day, I was
watching from the side and a woman had got a restraining order put out
against a man who had fathered a little boy with her, meaning that he
was not legally allowed to visit her or see his son. The hearing was
in the lowest court of the land, the Magistrates Court and the man had
brought a solicitor along with him to put his case forward.

What had happened was that despite no history of violence, the court
awarded the mother a restraining order against the father of the child
back in 2010, per her request – the reasons for the original order
being granted were not stated. The man had not seen his child since
November 2010. The mother (the “victim”) randomly got in contact
with the father again earlier this year (2013) welcoming him back into
her life. Yes, the supposed victim was welcoming back the supposed
“bad guy” into her and their child’s life.

The father spent two months living with the mother, raising his little
boy with the mother until she decided that she did not want the father
anymore and kicked him out on to the street. Distraught, as he had
been building a bond with his son over the two months he had been
living with the mother, he sent the mother of his son some non-violent
text messages asking when he could see his son again, the mother
ignored him and rather manipulatively presented the texts to the court
as evidence of harassment. Without her verbal consent to be in contact
(as she had rescinded her consent for him to see his son as casually
as she had invited him back into her life) he was in violation of the
restraining order issued by the court in 2010 (contacting someone via
text message who has a restraining order out against you is in direct
violation of the restraining order.)

The court clerk (a woman, no doubt) convinced the 3 magistrates
presiding that they did not have sufficient powers to deal with the
case (maximum sentence in a Magistrates Court is 6 months
imprisonment) so the case was moved up to the County Court and will be
heard at a later date in a higher court where a more serious penalty
can be awarded. Does more than 6 months in prison for violating a
restraining order with two text messages sound like justice to you?
Does that sound fair? Does this man deserve to have the right removed
to see his own flesh and blood? Does the child, a 7-year-old little
boy too innocent to know of the perversities of reality deserve to
grow up without a father because quite simply his mother is confused,
irrational and possibly spiteful? No, not at all. The court doesn’t
care, the feminists don’t care – women hold all the cards, the
child nor the man has any say in the matter at hand here.

In terms of inequality, the fact of the matter is, men have always
played dominant above women, men built this planet, they made most of
the discoveries, built most of the institutions, the technology,
philosophy, every extravagant splendour you can imagine – most were
envisioned, imagined, built, crafted, manifested and delivered by men.
If women were so great and so on par with men it isn’t too much of a
long shot to deduce they would have played a much more active part in
the socio-evolutionary process, instead they reared children and kept
house – they played logistics/nurturer, supporting man so he could
fight to live another day.

Feminists argue women were held down, but if women were equal to men
then how could they be held down by men? Violence you say? Then they
weren’t equal were they? They were weaker in a fundamentally
limiting aspect, they were lower in the social hierarchy by merit of
their own ineptitude. True inherent (and not socially constructed)
equality would suggest that men would be insufficient to enact such a
penalty, if you have two equal parties, one cannot overpower the other
in a stalemate situation, this is assuming the preposterous notion
that all men were abusive oppressive women beaters, which is a simply
hilariously bigotedly close-minded belief to hold about human history,
however it’s not something which is far off from what the average
feminist has been taught to believe.

The reality is, for most of human history it was accepted that the
gender roles assigned to men and women were efficient and benefited
the species in being structured in that way, that’s it – there’s
no evil “patriarchal entity” systematically enslaving womankind.
Feminism continues to ignore the achievements of man and focuses on
the lack of achievements of women, blaming men for this paradigm
rather than appreciating men for their continued sacrifice and
dedication to improving the human condition – as I said at the
start, it’s an incredibly biased and one-sided group of people who
have no room or tolerance in their worldview to see feminism
criticised in the even most slightest of negative contexts.

There is power with dominance, this is what a lot of the extremist
feminists saw and idolised, power “_but with all power comes great
responsibility_” there is a heck of a lot more expectation and
responsibility that comes with power, as addictive as power is to
humans – there’s a price to pay for having it. It’s quite funny
really because even in western nations people are brainwashed to say
men and women are equal, but then people always expect more and better
from a man, even women themselves do. It’s like an invisible sense
of cognitive dissonance which permeates the social fabric.

People rely on men, they lean on men, depend on men and burden men
with their emotions and what appreciation do men get? Fuck all. It’s
an obligation, an expectation, not a favour – you don’t get a pat
on the back for expectations “you’re a man, that’s what men
do.” and hey if you’re not deemed superior enough to be a man you
will be hit with some textbook shaming “grow a pair” “man up”
etc. It’s funny that feminists use these insults at all, actually,
because it infers subliminally that masculinity is inherently superior
to femininity by holding men to a higher standard of which they do not
hold women to, I’m sure of course this irony is totally and utterly
lost on them, as delicious as it is to identify.

Men get vilified, they’re painted as the bad guys and it’s safe to
openly disrespect them without anyone screaming “misandry!” – it
is a perverse civilization, one that has always been and is wholly
dependent on men, yet fails to appreciate them as a group for their
combined contribution to human betterment. Women today are like
children who were spoiled too much, you give them the world, you keep
giving them rights, you keep supplicating to their whims, you give in
to all their demands and what do they do? In their own privacy they
fantasize to 50 shades of grey, vigorously masturbating the shit out
of their clitoris’ whilst conversely talking shit about men and
their negative nature during the day in the public sphere, the very
same thing that they’re getting off too when it’s put on steroids
in an erotic novel. Wow, that irony there, again, I think the modern
woman’s sense of ironic contradiction is completely invisible to
her, if you ever needed “proof” women aren’t logical, that
generalisation would do a lot to enlighten you.

Women don’t respect men “for who they are”, they objectify them
as success objects, they respect a man’s power as it indicates his
ability to be successful, not his character but his power. If as a
man you become too weak,  a woman will leave you –  and leave you
to rot she will. The expectation is that you will be better than her,
stronger than her – by nature of hypergamy as if you are not, she
simply does not find you attractive. It’s for this reason alone the
sheer notion of equality, in all pragmatism is not only deluded but
completely incompatible with human sexual attraction. A woman’s
loyalty is tied directly to her man’s power, not his character. No
power = no attraction.

Example of power: you’re a manager at a store, sure you can fire
people/get paid more, but you also have to make sure everyone is OK,
comply with regulations, everyone comes to you if there is a problem
etc. Woman’s inherent ineptitude to reason makes them bad at these
kinds of jobs, the best women make great support roles, there’s a
few outliers who can lead well, but generally as a demographic they
are simply not cut out for leadership. Their inclination is to burden
their staff with their responsibilities by moaning (which creates a
bad leadership image), they blame-shift their faults onto others and
of course they delegate their own responsibilities to others,
generally, to men – expecting them to pick up the slack. Women are
just not very good with pressure, they panic and they dramatise and
ironically, you’ll find this funny, if you were to say this to them
it would elicit a sense of panic and drama, one that touches the
essence of her ego for making her aware that she is utterly
incompetent in such a manner. Through sheer indoctrination and modern
female narcissism, this repeatedly observed phenomena, a widely
observed truth, would be disregarded and decried. Hilarious.

I like women a lot, I do, I value their strange quality of seeming
almost in the moment, almost innocent in their lack of ability to
reason even despite their all too common and incredible capability to
effortlessly manipulate and inflict mental pain upon people, it is
something I can never be or experience because I am far too logical in
my disposition and thus it presents a certain element of mystical
esotericism to me – it is truly fascinating. However feminism
corrupts the feminine sensibilities and sells them the lie that men
are inherently bad people and that they as a group, women, should be
wary of the group known as men. Women swallow this bullshit up,
fearful as they are.

Women are stupid, brainwashed and emotional enough to believe this
bile, internalise it and regurgitate it “patriarchy!!!!” before
you know it’ll turn out Santa Claus was real, oh please. Men who
were brought up by women or otherwise raised in a feminist environment
get brainwashed too, they’re derogatively referred to as manginas,
they’re bumbling estrogen fuelled apologists with a cognitively
unhealthy level of self-hatred which manifests as this perverse need
to supplicate to the contemporary feminine social identity. It’s
sad. Feminism does fuck all positive for society anymore, civil rights
were about the only positive thing to come out of feminism.

I perceive modern-day feminism as a form of gender segregation, it’s
like when the whites and the blacks sat on different sections of the
bus in slavery, now you find women sticking with women, men sticking
with men and apart from when everyone is drunk and seeking sex, the
two groups barely mingle – their opinions of each other are bad,
gender relations are strained and some people are opting out
completely, just giving up on the other sex entirely.

It’s for that reason I’d encourage my fellow-men disenfranchised
with the current state of women and their indoctrinated feminist
influence to seek out more fruitful friendships with other men and
focus on themselves, rather than focus on the pursuit of attaining or
impressing women. Sure you have sexual needs, none of us can help that
– but placing so much of your happiness in the hands of an
“idealistic woman” a gentle woman, a kind woman, a non-vapid,
intelligent, cerebral, wise woman – a type of woman who has been
culled en masse by the brusque, curt hands of feminism will only seek
to damage one’s health mentally and bring forth great pain, what you
seek is a unicorn and unicorns are a mythological specie of animal,
there’s simply not enough to go around.

We all deserve better than this feminist bullshit our forefathers have
left us to deal with, but we deal with the hand we’ve got and live
the best way that we can. That’s a core tenet of the red pill
philosophy, be the best man you can be – don’t give in, do not
relent. Constantly work on yourself.

Don’t give in, find pride in yourself through both your heritage and
your potential to be better – actualise your potential, swimming in
feminist ideology will just destroy you. Feminism is something you
need to be aware of as it’s so entrenched in western societies, but
it’s like a sickness and red pill philosophy is the antibiotic to
get it out of your disease-ridden system, a strong dose of reality to
slap all that propaganda out of one’s indoctrinated head.

Acknowledge feminism, understand it, analyse its perverse nature,
accept it’s not going to disappear anytime soon – but reject its
message. You can’t change it so you must co-exist alongside it
without believing in it, just like people of different religions in
secular countries live side-by-side worshipping different gods without
believing in each others religions relatively peacefully, you must
live side-by-side with feminists, not buying into a single iota of
their babbling shit.

If you can do this you can find some semblance of happiness. Best of
luck to my fellow brothers who have been unjustly wronged by this
corrupt and perverse social system we’ve inherited.
 
-------------------------
Archived from https://theredarchive.com/blog/Illimitable-Men/feminism-womens-logic.19101