Scott Adams and his Master Seducer / Persuader series      
Krauser PUA | January 11, 2016 | by krauserpua
-------------------------
I’ve just started reading Scott
D̶i̶l̶b̶e̶r̶t̶&̶#̶8̶2̶1̶7̶;̶s̶ Adams’ blog and in
particular his MASTER PERSUADER series on DONALD TRUMP (h/t Mike at
Danger&Play
[http://www.dangerandplay.com/2015/09/20/why-donald-trump-is-winning-rhetoric-and-themes/]).
Each time I read a post I start transposing words like a find/place
bot swapping “Trump” for “the player” and “voter” for
“girl”. That in itself was interesting because I’ve found this
is a general habit for me. Every time I learn something new my mind
tries to find a game lesson in it.

[dilbert]

But let’s stick with D̶i̶l̶b̶e̶r̶t̶ Adams. First allow me to
quote him at length
[http://blog.dilbert.com/post/136958817396/the-laugh-tell-trump-master-persuader-series].

> “Have you ever been listening to Donald Trump speaking, or reading
> one of his quotes, and found yourself laughing out loud?
> 
> Maybe you think he has a good sense of humor and he says funny
> stuff. Maybe you think he is so shocking that you laugh out of
> social horror. Maybe you love how he pokes your political enemies.
> If you are not a Trump fan, maybe you think you are laughing AT him,
> or laughing out of disgust, or out of certainty he will be dooming
> himself this time for sure.
> 
> It’s a tell for persuasion. You laugh at Trump because you feel
> the persuasion, on a subconscious level, and not because anything
> was especially funny.
> 
> When I learned hypnosis, the instructor taught us that subjects
> often laugh during an induction.”
> 
> Laughter is a tell for persuasion. A causeless laugh means you got
> persuaded to the point where it challenged some long-held truth in
> your mind. The laugh is an automatic reflex in that situation.”

People often tell me that making girls laugh isn’t seductive:
_“bro, you’re not a comedian”_. If you’re on a nightclub
dancefloor grinding a drunk horny girl, I’ll agree. If you’re on a
street stop or first date with a girl then I most certainly disagree.

Game is about persuading the girl to sleep with you. That’s the very
essence of dealing with Maybe Girls. Note that “persuasion” is not
the same as wheedling, begging, imploring or logic-ing. You are
attracting a girl’s ATTENTION, getting her INTERESTED, then
persuading her to reach a DECISION that leads to ACTION. It’s the
AIDA model from sales. When you lay a cocky tease on a girl
early in the set she laughs. It’s not a ha-ha laugh, it’s more
like a “I’m can’t believe you just said that” laugh that
crackles with sexual tension. The better your sexual vibe the more
she’ll produce illogical giggles and laughs as an exhaust pipe for
her growing sexual interest.

The girl is feeling persuasion. She senses her increasing sexual
attraction towards you and can’t help laughing to cope with the
tension. Look for it. It means you’re winning.

[It's not his money that makes him alpha]
It’s not his money that makes him alpha

Let’s try another one of Adams’ posts from the series
[http://blog.dilbert.com/post/137088366306/the-iowa-reframing]:

> “I can’t stop laughing about Trump’s Iowa reframing. You
> probably heard about it. The setup goes like this:
> 
> – Trump was trailing Cruz in Iowa polls.
> – Trump taunted an Iowa audience with â€œYou have not picked a
> lot of winners.”
> – The media reported Trump’s taunts.
> 
> And the very next poll showed Trump slightly atop Cruz. The trap
> that Trump set for Iowa is that they can either vote for him â€“
> in which case he wins â€“ or they can vote for Cruz and prove he
> was right about Iowa having a bad track record. Then, say the polls,
> he will go on to win New Hampshire.
> 
> What you think you see is Trump telling people they should vote for
> him. In the 2D world, he is simply using different language to say
> what all politicians say. But in the 3D world of persuasion Trump
> just created a situation in which…wait for it… Iowans
> are VOTING ON THEIR OWN INTELLIGENCE. That’s an IDENTITY
> play. You should recognize it by now as the strongest form of
> persuasion.
> 
> Here’s what does NOT work: â€œLook at my awesome
> policies.”
> Here’s what DOES work: â€œSmart people vote THIS WAY.”

This is exactly what we do when we’re reframing the girl on the good
girl / bad girl spectrum. We are inviting her to position herself as
either:

 	* The bad girl who has to pretend to be a good girl, but we both
know better, nudge wink
 	* The good girl who has a bad girl inside her trying to get out

Both positions increase the likelihood of fast sex. This is the
“Iowa picking a winner” position. The alternative is for her to be
one of those boring good girls just like everyone else – the “Iowa
having a bad track record position”. We are making an IDENTITY PLAY
on her wish to be different from all those other girls.

So we cold read the girl and reframe the adventure sex option. “You
look like a kitten on the outside but there’s a tiger inside”.
“I get the feeling you are more adventurous than you look”.
“Look at that [item of clothing]. You almost convinced me you were a
good girl until I noticed that.”

There’s a segment in Daygame Overkill
[http://www.daygameoverkill.com/sales_pages/34477-daygame-overkill-sales-1]
all about how to do this and why. Like Adams says, it’s an identity
play. You aren’t convincing her that you’re a logical (i.e. high
SMV) alliance to make. You’re persuading her on the basis that
she’s a bit special and likes adventure. Then you provide her with a
safe outlet to pursue it (you).

> “When you hear mentions of Trump as a good front-runner it means
> â€“ to borrow a phrase from the world of investing â€“ we are
> on the brink of â€œcapitulation.” That’s the point
> where everyone just stops resisting the idea of a President Trump
> and starts adjusting to the reality of it.”

A girl might resist this positioning but if you keep reframing her
you’ll often feel that moment of capitulation arrive. She decides
she’s gonna do that one crazy thing after all. She’s capitulated
to the idea of being in your bed and starts adjusting to the reality
of it. YOLO.

Add together the two D̶i̶l̶b̶e̶r̶t̶ Adams’ concepts and you
get why the DAYGAME OVERKILL style fractionates between the highly
sexual bad boy and the charmingly polite gentleman. We need the smarts
to verbally convey the reframing and as the likeability cover for the
outrageous pushes and pulls that make her laugh.
 
-------------------------
Archived from https://theredarchive.com/blog/Krauser-PUA/scott-adams-and-his-master-seducer-persuaderseries.27335