TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

--EndLessOrochi-- Archive

View 0 posts and 494 comments by --EndLessOrochi-- on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)

I disagree. They are only stupid and pathetic if she isn't actually like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 03:55 PM

The complaint isn't about you doing it once . The complaint is about you doing it repeatedly. Although If the dude insists ,a woman that is into him will do it even if she doesn't like it at least once.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 03:54 PM

I mean ,if you only did it once . Sure. But that's not really what we are talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 02:44 PM

It kinda is if she did use to partake in these acts.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 02:42 PM

The fact that she did those things before but not with you is an indication that she doesn't do them because she isn't as into you as the other dude, not simply that she isn't the kind of girl that would do these things. Some men are willing to compromise on the things they want as long as they think the woman isn't doing it because of her character.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 01:04 PM

Well, how many attractive traits do you have compared to other women? You think you can't rank Amy Schumer compared to Monica Belucci?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 09:50 AM

Looksmatch is just what the word says, someone who is in the same tier of physical attractiveness (looks) as you within his gender. If you are a female 6 then a looksmatch is a male 6.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 09:03 AM

You don't seem to understand what LOOKSmatch means.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 08:04 AM
1

Don't think criminal is the only kind of asshole out there. It would be nice if things worked like you say but most of the problems with the dating world exist because they don't: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1474704915613909 https://akjournals.com/view/journals/2050/14/1/article-p1.xml Study shows that men who commit violence against women at a rate of 18x that of non-violent men are 4x more likely to be fathers, effectively showing that violence has a positive impact factor of…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 09:49 PM
0

If you actually read post,you would see that no. But even if it was it wouldn't change anything
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 08:12 AM
2

A woman wanting to suck my dick because she wants my help isn't rape. If Cendric was brought to court he would be found completely innocent . I don't know how much clearer to make this.Is a gold digger getting raped by the rich guy she is blowing because she wants his money?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 07:09 PM
4

She clearly wants to have sex if she offers it in exchange for my help.Would she prefer not to have sex and still get my help?Sure but I legitimately couldn't care less.She just doesn't sexually desire me . It's not rape in any way . Kinda gross you devalue actual rape by misusing the word like that 😔
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 05:57 PM
3

Yes. Duh?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 02:35 PM
2

Cedric ,how is this even a question? Are you asking if I would prefer to be in the friendzone or have a chick suck my dick?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 11:57 AM
0

It's not rape. He isn't obligated to help her and she can choose to survive on her own if she wishes. He isn't physically forcing her to have sex with him, isn't threatening to do so and isn't rendering her unconscious .
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 11:55 AM
1

Yes.otherwise how are they debating something they know nothing about?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 10:36 AM
1

Since the beginning. Look at the sidebar on trp. It's even on the glossary here in PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 09:59 AM
1

You should have read the basics of RP before coming to debate it yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 12:24 AM
1

Well, the motivations behind each is different. Negging is done to make the woman like you . Shit testing is done so that a woman can test if you are actually alpha or not, so that she knows if he is worth liking . Other than that, yeah in terms of what each actually involves they are pretty similar. But to play devil's advocate the women that say negging is bad are clueless enough to think that women don't shit test or at the very least those that do are bad. They are wrong but it's at least in…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 07:13 PM
3

What are you even doing in a sub debating the red pill without even knowing the basics of the red pill?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 07:04 PM
1

This is Purple pill debate . We use the terms as the red pill uses it. There shouldn't be any confusion about basic pill terminology in a sub about pills. If a normal looking dude dates and then marries a normal looking woman, which happens all the time, you would claim that still hypergamy since she is with the best man should could be. As said above, hypergamy isn't just about looks. As also said above , it's not even about who she dates or marries but who she is sexually attracted to. Plenty …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 10:35 AM
1

This is Purple pill debate . We use the terms as the red pill uses it. There shouldn't be any confusion about basic pill terminology in a sub about pills. hypergamy isn't about attraction. hypergamy is a strategy. In pill terminology, it's about attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 10:32 AM
2

Why? Words are coopted all the time. People that read the red pill understand what it means because one of the core things about it is literally explaining what it is. A western woman who want a man she’s attracted to, whatever her standards are, that’s not hypergamy. It is. The way she is attracted only to the best man is hypergamy according to the red pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 06:35 PM
5

because hypergamy in it's original definition was about status and financial ladder climbing. That was NEVER red pill hypergamy. Red pill hypergamy is "Women are only sexually attracted to the best (in a combination of looks,status,game) man they have interacted with."
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 05:25 PM
5

Nah. You can see it even from an early age. They evolved to find that behavior attractive because that's how the top men in our evolutionary past acted,both as a result of higher testosterone and of their circumstances ( abundant choice).
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 01:26 AM
18

Wrong. It IS a factor. A positive one. Women PREFER asshole men. Evolution has made them mistake douchebagery with strength and high value and thus made them sexually attracted to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 08:12 AM

I'm well aware of that. I don't know what that has to do with the comment you replied to however.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 06:06 PM

I'll keep that in mind. You seem awfully triggered by me saying that blowing dudes in club bathrooms isn't a very wise choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 06:05 PM

No only I am a catch. I'm saying they would want to marry most men because their standards take a nose dive as they get closer to 30. What you cite is a PREDICTION and probably just a result of marrying older ,not staying single forever. Also,I'm not single so don't get your hopes up.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 05:39 PM

Of course it is. Why wouldn't it be?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 05:19 PM

I'll wait a few decades and come to collect your left nut. Until then,that's the stat we have
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 05:19 PM

Wait till you hear that people that have managed to be single in their 50s don't treat people that are low value to them,which is what age and n count do (lower your value), well. Hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 04:36 PM

Married once in your life doesn't mean not ending up alone. Divorce is a (common) thing. But regardless,the notion isn't that they'll end up alone. Its that living like that will leave them only with choices that can't make them happy. Cheating,dead bedrooms, divorce and general misery.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 02:31 PM

Yeah agreed. And not even just for society's sake. They will be happier for it long term too.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 02:28 PM

You don’t think 50 year old women are getting treated well by the men they date? Obviously.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 12:53 PM

They don't know this. They think that there will be men they would want that are okay with whatever lifestyle they choose. Which isn't really the case. And no women aren't really fine with ending up single. Which is why they eventually settle. 95+% of people get married at least once in their lives. Male sexlessness takes a nose dive as they near their 30s. I don’t see women upset that the aren’t ending up with men they don’t want. They are upset they aren't ending up with men they want and thei…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 12:33 PM

Yeah . I'm not even saying this to dunk on women. I actually feel bad that society keeps lying to women that they can do whatever they want without taking into account what men actually want from women in a relationship and that there won't be consequences. It's kinda women's blue pill in a sense. Its like being a man and dressing and acting like a woman and expecting that this won't affect your relationships with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 12:28 PM

I'm sure some do but women won't be happy marrying a man that thinks like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 11:38 AM

Because gender greatly affects what someone wants. Men don't see the town bike and think "I really wish she was my wife and the mother of my children. Can't wait to financially entangle myself with her."
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 11:27 AM
1

He is just hanging out in places where drunk, probably "queer", sluts hang out
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 10:54 AM

Assuming that the men they are attracted to would want to marry them ,which isn't the case usually when they do things that men find unattractive for marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 10:35 AM

You'll probably have all the time in the world to do that for the both of us. Women aren't particularly happy when they don't get married.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 10:33 AM

You tell me . They're the ones desperate to marry. In the real world it's not men hounding women to get married. Marriage gives women status among other women, more money (since in 70% marriages the man makes more money) , someone to help raise their children and support them ,legal protection when raising said children , companionship and shared history.Its a very beneficial to women institution,which is why they all want it so much. And yes , obviously they would want to marry me (I'm a catch …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 10:32 AM

Ok. Then I'm not going to marry them. You can make yourself as unattractive for marriage as you want. Its just going to have consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 09:09 AM

We are talking about the west. 4B movement is pretty much nonexistent in terms of numbers. Women use social media,not dating apps. Single doesn't mean swearing off dating ,reread my first comment in this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 06:50 AM
2

Because they always want more for the dude. They don't know they can't keep the guy. Or at least they don't internalize it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 07:16 AM
1

Having looks as a requirement isn't the same as saying that they are actively trying to sleep with as many hot guys as possible. Women sleep around in an attempt to snatch a high value guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 06:31 AM
1

Nothing to do with women swearing off dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 06:29 AM
4

Its unbelievable that they would pump and dump. Relationships failing or losing attraction are different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 06:21 AM
2

Well, I'm sure a lot of them could offer more. But she prefers gambling on the chance that one of the men pumping and dumping her will instead hold on to her. Its really quite similar to gambling addiction where instead of working they fall for the appeal of easy millions.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 10:49 PM
0

Not in any percentage that matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 10:46 PM
1

Nothing about the dating scene now is showing me that women are swearing off dating. Millions in a world of billions means nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 10:44 PM
2

That better men than you are willing to dump a load in her.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 10:41 PM
2

It’s not always the men who are choosing to not stick around. Sure.Just almost always. I know when I date, I will continue dating as long as things are going well, but the minute I see a red flag, I am out of there. I’d much rather just stay home and enjoy my life, over introducing drama or chaos into it. I’m looking for a partner, but I don’t want someone that doesn’t fit what I am looking for. I know in my case, I’m looking for signs of intelligence, empathy, and compassion, and the moment I s…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 10:40 PM
0

Apparently you have a unique definition of the word many
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 07:36 PM
-1

Does it ever occur to some of you guys that it might be the women doing the pumping and dumping in a lot of these scenarios? No.Not at all. This almost never happens. end up being terrible in bed. I guess that happens occasionally but it's not what we call a pump and dump.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 07:35 PM
-3

Most women don't swear off dating. Being single for long periods of time for most women just means that she is currently going on dates and getting fucked by men that don't stick around.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 06:15 PM
0

Well,you aren't competing with no men in that case. You are competing with the men that pump and dump her.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 06:10 PM
1

If you actually look at the study referenced you'll see that the majority of that percentage is coming from adolescents ,not college students, and 1st year college students. Apparently there is an epidemic of rapist teens 🙄 (of course,it's probably just kids being too dumb to understand the question but anyway). Rates drop to about 1-2% by year 3 and 4 of college.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 03:27 PM
1

Of course it's mathing. Yeah ,of course they can have whatever standards they want. I didn't say otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 12:15 PM
-4

As you said , anecdotal. Stats say 1% of men are rapists . I'll be generous and say you can double that and it still would mean that men aren't rapists in any significant degree. Which wouldn't happen if we followed "natural law". This of course is just one of the horrible things that happen if we simply followed nature. The natural state is extremely disadvantageous to women,even more than men. So in summary, don't aspire for the natural state of things as a woman, it's not something you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 11:35 AM
-3

Nah. Only 1% of them do.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 09:46 AM
-6

In the animal kingdom men rape any woman they find unaccompanied. You don't want to apply your logic to that. Just putting that out there!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 07:27 AM
6

Or the party guy who is a bad person but just isn't a criminal or particularly violent. That's also a man women are interested in. The main point is that asshole is sexually attractive to women.Especially more so than being a good a good dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 06:23 PM
1

It becomes debatable. Is it for a relationship? How attractive? How bitchy?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 06:21 PM
4

Yes. For relationships. And all things equal. If one is much hotter ,its more debatable.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 11:26 AM
16

They MIGHT not date a criminal but they would date most flavors of asshole. Women have so many options that claiming that they don't date abusers because of their abusive traits is nonsense. They are supposedly so selective all the time but for some reason give a pass to an abuser...
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 11:19 AM
16

It's very simple logic: 1.The more attractive you are, the less you need the other person. A dude who sees you as an oasis in an endless desert of sexlessness will treat you better than someone who can easily get a replacement. Relative attractiveness. Man that is a 9 will value a woman that is a 6 less than a man who is a 6 would.For reasons related to 1. This means that ON AVERAGE, an attractive dude is more likely to treat you worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 06:30 AM
1

Or they fuck people over.Hard to say when you are still getting to know someone. Like I said ,it's a red flag, not an absolute dealbreaker.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 05:17 PM
2

Isn't that kind of a sin too? But yeah, that's even more of a red flag, especially at that age.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 01:16 PM
0

Lol, actually valid reason to like the sexlessness epidemic
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 10:13 AM
2

Well, premarital sex is a sin in Christianity.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 10:12 AM

Here, the first paragraph of the link in the first post. And another one that states: Yeah ,this refers to red pill ideology, which as already stated has nothing to do with anything illegal. The goal was to keep the message red pill while adhering to reddit's guidelines,not make it soycuck theory #2378. And they did keep it within the guidelines. Besides if you surf the TRP subreddit you will find things like this: One was telling me "but it's a small town, people..." I didn't let her finish tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 05:19 PM

Nothing on the link says what you say in the first paragraph. Nothing on TRPs message has to do with advocating for violence or anything illegal.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 01:17 PM

Well,that's not true at all. It was moderated a lot and any posts that violated reddit guidelines were quickly removed. TRP didn't get quarantined because of rule breaks or anything like that. It got removed because it was a wrongthink sub that got too big. Just like every other wrongthink sub that got too big was also banned/quarantined,at around the same time too. Reddit even gave us an alternative positive masculinity website to look through when trying to access trp....and then the people of…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 08:58 AM

It means he is more likely to.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 04:55 PM

He isn't saying everyone should become pimps.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/24 11:56 PM

Just because he makes money through them,it doesn't mean he respects them . Like, it's literally his gf, in a relationship with him, and he wants her to do dishonorable stuff in front of other men. I fail to see the logic behind such hypocrisy. It's simple,he didn't care for them and thus didn't have an issue with taking advantage of them . If he loved them he obviously wouldn't pimp them out.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/24 10:45 PM
0

It seems hard to you because in your mind cheating means having a whole second relationship. You just want to bang a chick casually to sate your desire for sexual variety. You already have a wife ,you don't need a second one.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/24 12:14 AM
0

You don't have to tell the mistress you are married. You don't have to keep the same mistress for long You don't have to be doing it very often. It's very easy to keep things under wraps so option 2 is very easy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 03:03 PM
0

Just world fallacy. Especially if you don't make a whole relationship out of the mistress it's very easy to hide it. Fuck ,you could even go to prostitutes and she would have 0% chance of finding out if you aren't tarded.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 01:40 PM
1

There is only fallout if she finds out. Again,I don't condone it but it's bizarre to say it's not appealing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 09:10 AM
-6

Ok ,not that I agree with cheating but there is certainly appeal to it. Just because they want to bang new pussy it doesn't mean they still don't love their wives or like their relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/24 09:18 PM

You know what cracks me up about this sub? All of the men who've never been married who try to tell us what it's like. Well,if you know what it's like that well , you should be capable of arguing your position competently . I'm waiting to be amazed 😂 Because we've lived it. Dozens of women in that one thread alone that I linked. No way! DOZENS of self selected women ? Well,the argument is settled then.😂 But sure, YOU know better. lol Clearly. As I've shown after all, women initiate the divorces …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 01:42 PM

I'm not married.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 12:28 PM

Lol, what a well thought out argument!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 11:07 AM
1

https://web.stanford.edu/~mrosenfe/Rosenfeld_gender_of_breakup.pdf If the woman wanted the breakup more, that is scored as “1”; if the man wanted the breakup more, that is scored as “0”; and if both partners wanted the breakup equally, that is scored as “0.5.” Table 1 shows that women accounted for 69% of the breakups of heterosexual marriages, consistent with the approximately two thirds of divorces wanted by wives reported in other studies (England and Kilbourne 1990; Sayer et al. 2011; Sweene…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 10:40 PM
1

I don't know why women have convinced themselves so strongly of this nonsense: https://web.stanford.edu/~mrosenfe/Rosenfeld_gender_of_breakup.pdf If the woman wanted the breakup more, that is scored as “1”; if the man wanted the breakup more, that is scored as “0”; and if both partners wanted the breakup equally, that is scored as “0.5.” Table 1 shows that women accounted for 69% of the breakups of heterosexual marriages, consistent with the approximately two thirds of divorces wanted by wives r…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 10:37 PM
-2

And yet women initiate 70-80% of divorces.... Women like GETTING married. They have trouble STAYING married.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 11:35 AM
1

...wut?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 11:12 AM
1

The premise was that one guy looked and acted so smooth that it wasn’t believable that he’d be looking to pay for sec Yes and I explained how it's a false premise. Rich dudes can pull easily and still pay for whores for example.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 06:46 PM
4

No, because the premise was that it's men that NEED to pay for it. And they don't,because alcoholics have no issue getting laid without paying for it. It's not just losers that hire prostitutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 06:42 PM
2

I'm not pushing it, it's just reality for them. Sex and romance are separate things for men
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 06:38 PM
10

Alcoholics have no problem getting laid 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 05:08 PM
0

It is for men
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 05:05 PM
2

Almost definitely. And like you said ,this probably means that they'll end up miserable whether they have a child or not.Its more of a question of which outcome is MORE miserable.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 08:09 AM

Did I say anything close to that?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 01:15 AM

He managed to get laid and married before . He can do it again.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 01:03 AM

And she was rewarded for that with not having to pay for her lifestyle while she was married to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 01:01 AM
6

Cute
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 12:00 PM
8

Yes. Just not at that price 😂 That's called haggling.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 10:04 AM
4

Average Joe is probably a bit on the chubby side himself, so whinging about not getting thin sexy ladies Thankfully that's not what happens. Chubby joe is ok with chubby Becky . Chubby Becky isn't ok with chubby joe.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 01:13 PM
22

Most
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 08:52 AM
1

There are definitely things that I can do right now that would be a turn on to my wife that if I had done it after 1 month of dating it would have been a turn off / cringe / weird. Like?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 10:47 PM
-1

Cute,maybe . Attractive,nah. It will be unattractive for the same reason it was unattractive at the start. It gives her comfort and comfort while necessary in relationships, isn't sexually attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 08:18 AM
-5

No, in general. I don't know what makes you think that something that is unattractive in the beginning stops being unattractive later.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 07:05 PM
-9

Being nice to HER is the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 03:19 PM
2

Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 05:50 PM
2

Ok,so imagine you are in a forest, what would you rather see in front of you? A bear or a man?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 05:07 PM
1

Glad to let you know sis
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 02:12 PM
1

Can't have fun with something so easy. I've been in a relationship for years.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 08:37 AM
1

It doesn't appear like they've truly just accepted what they believe is women's nature, because if they did, they would not act so bitter about it. They accept women's nature and don't like the women that don't try to reign in it's bad side. I don't call women resentful for not liking cheaters (bad expression of male nature).Same thing. Like, it's obvious that some women simply either don't care about height How is such a thing obvious? You can be attractive DESPITE having an unattractive trait.…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 07:53 PM
-4

They say that, but the resentment towards women paints another picture. Red pill isn't resentful of women. This may seem correct on the surface but the conclusions RP draw are often way too far off. Like, the idea that only 5-10% of men are in a relationship that benefits them, as suggested in the OP post Long term,it's true. At least the essence of it. Whether it's 10% or 20% is up to debate.Because of hypergamy,LONG TERM only the top men are able to maintain women's attraction. but so many guy…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 05:22 PM
-7

Psychological warfare implies more Ill intent than there is in reality. These bad things that red pill says women do aren't intentional most of the time ,they are just a result of how female sexuality works. She can't turn off hypergamy just because she got into a relationship , she can't choose to be attracted to beta behaviors ,she can't logic herself into being attracted to someone or stop herself from being attracted to someone else .Similar to how men can't stop themselves from finding boob…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 01:15 PM
5

If I'm being taken advantage of, I'm wise enough to trust myself to know I'm being used That's kinda the point,if you don't see these dangers you kinda aren't wise enough to see you are being used.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 08:22 AM
0

Link?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 09:26 AM
-1

Studies don't measure engagement period and dating period separately. So, women couple up at the time of the epiphany phase.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 10:08 PM
0

Sex is the main value women provide in most relationships they have with men. When that value is no longer valuable ,women will have to put more effort for lesser rewards. I don't see any way that would be a win for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 11:03 PM
2

It's win-win for everyone involved While I mostly agree with what you say,how is it a win for women?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 11:52 AM
1

Multiple year long happy relationship and fucked plenty of women before that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 09:17 AM
1

I can. Extraverted narcissists were found more attractive, non extraverted narcissists and non narcissist extraverts werent. It's clearer if you read the actual study.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 10:39 PM
17

Pretty amazingly.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 10:28 PM
1

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283732665_How_Alluring_Are_Dark_Personalities_The_Dark_Triad_and_Attractiveness_in_Speed_Dating Nah,they are specifically attracted to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 09:16 AM
1

Nope. I was talking about the wedding industry. Marriage industry =/= wedding industry What does the marriage involve if not weddings and honeymoons? Less marriages....but not less domestic partnerships or other non married but living together relationships or other LTRs. These are temporary. Isn't that what boys here want? They want that BECAUSE marriage is dying Seems like this is great news for dudes who don't want to get married But bad for society and the SMP
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 06:58 PM
3

Niceness isn't particularly subjective. You know what being nice means. HOW nice you want to be is another thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 06:43 PM
1

Marriage isn't expensive. I mean weddings.We are talking about the marriage industry after all Marriage rates are rising in age, but people still overwhelmingly get married. They are getting married at the lowest rate in modern history.They arent just getting delayed .
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 06:42 PM
2

Marriage rates have reached a historic low and marriage is indeed becoming more expensive.What are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 05:30 PM
3

Nope
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 01:19 PM
12

They are actually pretty actionable ,just not true. If you tell someone to be nice,he knows what to do. Problem is being nice is sexually unattractive
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 09:18 AM
2

Marriage is dying,not the industry.the industry is growing because marriages get more and more expensive.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 08:34 AM
1

And half of it stops being his upon divorce. As for what you gain, you gained half his shit on marriage. Divorce is what allows you to "cash out" and keep his shit while chasing other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 08:31 AM
3

I don't see how this study is better. Women tend to massively inflate how much they spend ,for example by putting their makeup as a cost of the date.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 09:28 PM

?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 07:57 PM

They were. Which is why sexlessness was lower.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 07:56 PM

I can think of better alternatives
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 07:55 PM

Yeah this. Noone is complaining about dating in 2000 . Things were fine then. The problem is with how the SMP became after social media and OLD. Hypergamy is ok In a pool of 50 ,it just gets ridiculous with a pool of 5000
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 12:08 PM
3

Correct.But I would also argue there already are undesirable consequences.Its just that today society obfuscates a lot of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 11:05 PM
1

when the opposite is seemingly more common ...what?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 12:19 AM
1

She isn't AS hypergamous,possibly. All women are hypergamous . But it doesn't matter because the high n is intrinsically unattractive even if they have nothing else "wrong" with them
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 12:08 AM

Women have been able to choose for decades and there were no issues until OLD and social media became mainstream.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 01:00 PM

That’s because the probability of a woman approaching a man and it working out is actually slimmer than if the man approaches .... what? It doesn’t make sense for women to waste their time going after a guy who has a lot of other options and she isn’t his first choice How does the man approaching first ensure that? Men are more likely to be cheaters and not want to commit so in order for a relationship to work the man has to like the woman more How does the man approaching first ensure that?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 05:04 PM

Well,that's good and all but I'm talking about how the number of times a woman will approach a man in her lifetime can be counted with one hand .
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 02:06 PM
11

Yes.4 times in your life
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 09:39 AM
10

It's hilarious how women pretend they approach at any frequency worth mentioning.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 09:39 AM
1

No?Why would he go to jail? Jail isn't about responsibility
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 04:03 PM
0

None is saying that the liars aren't at fault.But the one that falls for the lie is too
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 03:54 PM
2

This is a horrific way of thinking that takes blame of abusers and onto victims. It puts the blame on both. One can be coerced and manipulated without any form of violence being involved And if they were,they were the ones that ultimately made the choice.They aren't absolved from the responsibility of their actions. A lot of age gaps can involve women younger than 20, where there are indeed practically a child. 18yos aren't children.Which is why 18yo vote . She is likely at uni, maybe doesn't ev…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 03:51 PM
2

Being manipulated doesn't absolve you from the responsibility of your actions and agency.It doesn't matter if you were manipulated to do something ,in the end YOU chose to do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 03:44 PM
0

You are responsible for your own actions, not for the actions of others. And since you are responsible for your actions,you are responsible for the things that happen to you because of them. Agreeing to something because you were lied doesn’t make it so that the other persons lie is somehow „neutralized“. Its on you that you fell for the lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 03:42 PM
-2

Neither men or women's brains are fully developed by 25, that doesn't mean you don't have any rational thoughts or intelligence until that age. I fail to see what this point means It means that long before 25,your brain has developed enough for you to be fully responsible for your decisions and for you to be treated like an adult. Age gap relationships are often founded on manipulation tactics, DARVO abuse tactics, coercion, threats, bribery etc. Unless they were literally threatened with violen…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 10:25 PM
3

...in your world having agency doesn't mean that you are responsible for your actions?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 10:18 PM
1

Not necessarily a liar, just not self aware. The study shows the effect increased options have in women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/24 01:21 PM
2

Being red pill doesn't mean that you close your mind and ignore what half the population has to say. Being red pill means that you know that that particular half of the population severely lacks self awareness and constantly virtue signals. So it does kinda mean that you ignore most of the things they say they want. No Beta Buxx are not competent and successful because the ultimate cache among guys is respect They are competent and successful, which is why they have the Buxx, at least a lot of t…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 03:22 PM
2

about top tier men that get all the women what they are talking about are the men who have competence and are successful Not really, no. Beta Buxx is also competent and successful . Loser drug dealers aren't and yet are sexually successful. You are mistaking things men find admirable with the things women find sexually attractive. Also consider what women here claim they want in a partner. Why are you listening to women? No offense but are you should you haven't misflaired yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 03:06 PM
0

Nah, you don't. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25098803
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 12:32 PM
3

Not when that competence and success isn't accompanied with sexual success.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 12:02 PM
1

1:The arguing is whats harming the kids. 3:They change into thinking banging young pussy is higher status? Pretty sure men know that from boyhood. If you think you are that malleable, don't make a lifelong commitment and bring kids into it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 11:44 AM
4

1:Dont act like children and argue all the time then. 2:The topic is about divorce. 3:If you think banging younger chicks is higher status, don't get married in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 10:55 AM
4

No, it's better for the kids to have an intact family than "happy parents". Don't try to rationalize your selfishness. If security is boring you shouldn't have married in the first place. Same for the status thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 08:31 AM
1

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2017/09/20/americans-see-men-as-the-financial-providers-even-as-womens-contributions-grow/ Yours actually says the same but they just separated the marriages where men and women make similar incomes,since men make more money even in that bracket too. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2023/04/13/in-a-growing-share-of-u-s-marriages-husbands-and-wives-earn-about-the-same/ Today, wives in egalitarian marriages earn $60,000 at the median, while husbands…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 08:40 AM
0

You should break those statistics into age groups. You are free to do so. But until you do, I'm gonna stick with what we got. Women now graduate from law schools and medical schools at a higher rate than men And that's great but men still make more money in all age groups. Women don't marry men who make less than them.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 03:49 PM
1

Genuine question, have you ever had a meaningful friendship with a woman? Yeah. All my relationships have been great. But you aren't really debating, you just say the benefit of marriage is friendship and don't explain why that is the case. Also seems like your account may be newer here, so if you don’t already know we don’t need to debate to death. It’s about exchanging ideas, most of the time we agree to disagree. If you’re looking for a trophy, please try another comment thread and get out of…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 03:46 PM
0

He mentions companionship and sexual exclusivity because these things clearly aren't pros of marriage. Which makes sense. If you ask your average happily married couple they’ll probably say the main reason is they wanted to spend their life with their best friend And again, they could do that without getting married. So the answer clearly isn't that. It's a combination of social norms that haven't caught up with current culture and laws and women pushing for it because they actually benefit from…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 01:58 AM
1

He didn't mention friendship because friendship isn't a pro of marriage. It's a pro of relationships. What things that aren't exclusive to marriage did he mention?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 01:49 AM
2

That's great for your friends but statistically, women make less money in 70% of marriages and the income gap is larger in that percentage vs the remaining 30%
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 01:46 AM
1

Both partners manage the family. Do you honestly know women who don't work, don't contribute to the running of the home, have nothing to do with their kids, etc? Doesn't require getting legally married. adultery Cheating rates and abuse rates aren't nearly different enough to account for the difference in divorce initiation. Women initiate 70-80% (depending on the stat) of divorces. Yes, look at it. Do you notice how many women are in dead bedrooms they did not choose? Statistically, extremely f…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 01:44 AM
3

But what you described doesn't require marriage. You can have a have relationship full of companionship without getting married. OP was talking about how the institution of MARRIAGE benefits men, not relationships in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 01:35 AM
1

I know that's not the point for women, that's why I clarified it's for men. It would definitely be worse for women. The point is that men try to bang women and women try to select the ones that see them seriously. Women really have trouble with doing that because they are attracted to assholes but that's another topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 10:58 PM
0

But that’s not the point of the first date, it’s not to see if you can enjoy each other’s company. Not for men. For men the point of the first date is to bang you. In fact thats the point of every date until they bang you.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 08:24 AM
1

Doubt they were the same but regardless.They affected a much smaller percentage of the population than they do now.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 09:47 AM
0

In the past, women didn’t have the option of choosing a partner she was attracted to Lol, im not talking about the fifties. Im talking about 15 years ago Sexlessness wasn't an issue until the advent of social media and OLD.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 01:13 AM
1

women wish we were physically attracted to more men so we had more options. In the past, you were. That's the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 01:48 PM
1

Lol, what do you mean more often than not? Assholes are much more successful with women than regular dudes.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 06:02 PM
2

It does however mean that it works.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 06:02 PM
6

Someone who rapes also “succeeds” at having sex. Yeah. I don't get your point. what about lying and manipulation? Or telling a girl you love her so she’ll be willing to sleep with you, then ghosting her afterwards? If they treat women like shit they obviously don't care about doing all that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 12:29 AM
13

After fucking half the female population and spreading their genes like Genghis Khan. They are certainly successful with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 12:25 AM
6

Treating a woman like a human doesn't mean that you treat her in the same way you treat a man. Ah, so you mean they should treat them like they would treat a woman. I hope you understand then why "treat them like a human" is a retarded thing to say. along the lines of forget all the strategy and bullshit and just behave and interact in a way that you would with a woman who's a human being: meaning multi-dimensional and complex. What makes you think people don't strategize for non sexual interact…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 10:03 PM
9

Seems like a pretty simple definition. He wanted sex and was successful in getting it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 09:58 PM
12

Right. Assholes for example are known to not be able to find women.... My god the delusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 09:57 PM

If women were polyandrous, they would date like men do. The lesbian SMP is very different to the gay SMP
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 04:30 PM

Nope. Women are SERIALLY monogamous, not polyandrous.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 12:59 PM

It's based on false premises. First of all, women can't romantically love someone and sexually desire someone else. Their romantic love follows their sexual desire and vice versa. Secondly, male love is possessive. If you want him to love you, you have to be exclusive with him.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 11:06 AM

Your entire argument hinges on this premises, yet you haven't provided any compelling reasons or evidence for it. I did actually. ->Men are attracted to neoteny. Women aren't. https://metro.co.uk/2019/02/22/men-regardless-age-will-always-attracted-women-early-20s-8718590/ https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/08/online-dating-out-of-your-league/567083/ Although I shouldn't have to provide sources for the fact that men like neoteny and women don't care for it. It's self evident and com…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 04:34 PM

Why do you think the average age gap between couples is only 1-3 years despite men generally having a preference for young women regardless of their own age? Proximity. Age gap relationships are a sizable percentage of relationships despite the very strong effect proximity has. Also, the women that get the men close to their age, tend to do so before they hit the wall. There is no flaw to the wall theory and it's self evident to everyone with eyes and a tiny bit of logic. Men are attracted to ne…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 03:55 PM
1

The whole women shouldn’t be allowed to vote, have a good career or a bank account is really off putting It's not a call to violence however or against any rules. Certainly not when they quarantined the sub. Hilariously, when reddit quarantined the sub, they linked people that visited it towards a "positive masculinity " Gay ass organization..... And then it came out the founders of that organization were facing sexual assault allegations 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 03:47 PM
5

Lol no
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 02:04 PM
9

I think the main reason men subs tend to get banned more often is because they promote violence against women. Not at all. The red pill sub for example was quarantined despite following all reddit rules and never advocating for violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 02:01 PM
0

Yeah it's a good topic. I don't know why women are so triggered by it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 01:59 PM
6

Porn actually causes less rape. It's pretty well established. i'd argue men are becoming more violent and disrespectful which is more dangerous for women ... How can you argue that when violence and crime rates are DECREASING?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 11:12 AM

Agreed.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 04:58 PM
7

Definitely but the covariance isn't that high. It will still be a pretty low number.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 03:55 PM
4

Attraction isn't a conscious process. It's an instinctual process.You don't logic your way into being attracted to someone. So we very much are like animals in that regard.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 08:14 AM
4

Of course they do. Just like men evolved with a certain sexuality that's shared amongst members of the same gender (and just like every other animal in the world works) , so do women share the same sexuality. Their BEHAVIORS vary, the way their attraction works doesn't. That's not to say some women aren't better than others. Dating a nun isn't gonna be the same as dating a stripper, but they are both sexually attracted to the same things and with the same mechanism.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 06:58 AM
6

I wouldn't say that any man would be happier avoiding casual sex. Men are naturally polygynous after all. It's more correct to say that they shouldn't dismiss relationships/marriage.but even that, due to how hypergamy works, is only true for the top men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 06:53 AM
5

fail to distinguish between dating/sex and marriage. If you don't do this, then in my opinion you haven't advanced to square one You marry who you date. But most importantly, TRP teaches about how female sexuality works. Sexual attraction is CRUCIAL in both dating and marriage. It's decline is the main reason marriages fail. you do not need to attract "women" to be happy in love, you just need to attract one good woman. That one good women is still a woman and thus is attracted to the things oth…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 06:50 AM
0

Wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 05:32 AM
2

Why, what happens if you don't get it? You are unsatisfied. No; but let's face it, the TRP zeitgeist is defeatist when it comes to relationships and society and mostly these dudes think it's a bad idea. Not really no. Trp is a toolbox that teaches you how female sexuality works and how to navigate it to get what you want out of women. What you want is up to you. However due to how female sexuality and hypergamy work, it IS indeed a bad idea for MOST men to have serious relationships with women .
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 09:03 PM
2

Lol no.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 09:00 PM
1

Women don't want to fuck as many men as possible. Red pill doesn't claim otherwise. Women sleep around because they can't keep a dude or easily lose attraction to said dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 06:12 PM
2

It doesn't need to be a human to be advanced. Having a sense of pain wont make it "more advanced " for example.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 06:10 PM
3

Every woman's dream!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 06:09 PM
4

Sexual variety. One of the main male imperatives. And it's not like you have to do it forever.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 05:02 PM
3

I'm not saying it's not success because it's easy. I'm saying it's not success because it's not what women want. If women want to have more sexual partners bullying wont make it easier for them. Just saying "yes" Or "want sum fuck" will.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 04:44 PM
3

Most companies are owned by the same parent company to give the illusion of freedom of choice. So they’re not going to make their own companies compete with themselves for a race to the bottom. They would have to find a way to enforce that monopoly and I don't really see how they would stop a competitor from popping up. Not saying it's impossible but somewhat difficult. As for affection many people get upset if they have to pay for affection in any capacity which is why OF, sex workers and gold …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 04:41 PM
2

I'm saying that they feel like losers because it doesn't feel and look like real. Seeing someone grab a booty on video isn't the same as grabbing it yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 04:32 PM
4

It's not low. And yet it didn't help.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 04:30 PM
5

What incentive does a company have to make a customer pay once rather than making them pay monthly forever? The fact that another company would make a model that's purchase and not subscription. You need the company to keep providing value to you to make it a subscription. Like game servers. I'm sure there would be other ways to monetize it, like making it look like a celebrity for example or maintenance. With that in mind, the most profitable thing to keep selling is affection. Again, though, t…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 04:23 PM
5

It's not the first time I'm hearing that opinion but I'm surprised every time. I think it's the fault of Hollywood. Making people think that AI = human but metal.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 04:19 PM
3

I wouldn't use the word "only". I'm guessing the second wife wasn't and it didn't help much.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 04:12 PM
5

No, it just has to not have a sense of pain. You are anthopomorphizing AI when you shouldn't. It's not a human and it doesn't need to be to be advanced. It doesn't have human values, it has the values you program it to have. If you program it to love pimples, then that's what it'll do.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 04:10 PM
3

Yeah, the point is thats not what any woman is after. ANY woman can have that at ANY moment.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 04:06 PM
3

That’s why it will always be a niche Lol what's the why? You just repeated the same thing twice. and feel of “the real thing” by getting the real thing with escorts right now anyways.* Escorts are EXPENSIVE, unhygienic and (in the US ) illegal.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 04:05 PM
2

It’s still going to make them feel like losers Not if it feels and looks real enough. Porn has that effect now because it doesn't,it's a poor substitute. And even if it doesnt fulfill them, it's still gonna have a DRAMATIC effect in the SMP. it would remove male thirst as a factor from the SMP.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 04:02 PM
3

1.Yeah.Noone is talking about what CURRENT AI. We are talking about the future of the technology. And we don't really need the feelings to be real, just be convincingly portrayed. In fact not even that. The only thing men need is for it to be able to realistically emulate sex. .Tv is similar as in you have to buy the tv and pay monthly for cable and extra programs/services. And? You would just pay monthly or whatever for the sex bot/vr. Although I have my doubts the technology wouldn't inevitabl…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 04:00 PM
3

I don't think any woman would disagree with what I just said 😂 An 80 yo grandma can have literally hundreds of sexual partners. Doesn't mean she is more successful than a 20 yo with 2.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 03:56 PM
1

I'm saying I see this irl too genius. Tik tok is just something YOU as an internet stranger, can see for yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 03:54 PM
8

not really foreseen by its programmers, such as “unattractive men are unattractive” Uhm, no? The programmers would write "you find the traits your owner has attractive" and the ai would program itself AROUND THAT. It's a program, it can be made to value whatever you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 03:53 PM
0

Yes I think most would understand the “artificial” on artificial intelligence Literally no man cares about this. All it needs is to look and feel like real sex. Maybe I’m not the one that doesn’t understand that most dudes would rather fuck a real girl than anything fake. Really boggles my mind how you can believes this.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 03:50 PM
5

And how would the bots not being attracted to their owners get them more money?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 03:19 PM
0

Flesh lights and current sex dolls are a bad substitute for sex.They are more expensive without being lifelike enough. Realistic sex dolls /Vr wouldn't be. They would feel like the real thing. If you think men would say no to a customizable dime that would do whatever nasty and dirty thing they wanted as often as they wanted, you don't understand men.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 03:18 PM
13

You've had like 5 divorces. You should probably wonder whether marrying a slut is a good thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 03:02 PM
5

And which is why, once that technology becomes easy, it will be used ubiquitously too
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 03:00 PM
1

It does but for a lot of men, it's a question between duty sex vs no sex and in that case duty sex is the better option. For all men however a restored dependence would obviously tilt the SMP in their favor.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 02:59 PM
7

Lol, and why wouldnt it be used ubiquitously like, you know, porn?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 02:55 PM
7

I hope this is a joke but in case it isnt, you do understand how programming works, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 02:54 PM
1

Lol, I'm not taking tik tok seriously. But I can't show you an example in real life because you are a stranger on the internet. I can show you tik tok however.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 02:50 PM
1

Everywhere. You can check tik tok if you want and all the complaints about men not being masculine anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 02:23 PM
1

why woman don’t want a relationship like this, where they are second and controlled by a man, expected to be compliant and always putting someone first Lol, thats exactly the relationship women want. You'll notice most of women's complaints are about being in the gender reversed situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 12:18 PM
9

Number of sexual partners isn't how female dating success is measured.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 11:58 AM

-Artificial wombs: Yeah, agreed on that one women outshining men: Women make less money and are in fewer positions of power. They aren't outshining men in any metric that actually matters. Getting more Advanced Calligraphy degrees doesn't really mean anything. men being sedated: Men not working would crush our current system.Men are a net positive on taxes, women aren't. As for automation, the jobs that will get automated first are the jobs women do like retail, secretarial shit etc. Manual labo…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 11:50 AM

Well, third spaces help but they indeed arent the root of the issue. See my other comment in this thread
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 12:32 AM

I live in a country where people still go out and socialize very regularly. The dating market is still much worse than the one 10+ years ago. You can't give the hypergamous sexual selectors of the species access to an infinitely larger, easy to filter through dating pool that's not constrained by timing and geography and available from the comfort of your home, and expect things to not take a turn for the worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 12:31 AM

Quite clearly. She is crying every time she is on screen and keeps mentioning how people keep mentioning the porn thing to her in her daily life.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 10:45 PM

And who is very visibly miserable.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 09:47 PM

It's more politically correct than blaming women and/or social media.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 08:38 PM
1

You do realize how unreliable by nature statistics for things like cheating are, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 06:01 AM
0

Kudos from me.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 03:08 PM
1

.... What? Trp explicitly puts the responsibility of any lack of success on the man and requires of him to put in a lot of effort to get it. Workout, learn game , get money and status etc. Etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 02:23 AM
-1

This seems correct. Have you ever been a man?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 11:05 PM
1

Being confident, assertive, charming, proactive, goal-oriented are not asshole traits. Sure. But being arrogant, selfish, dominant, aggressive and showing her you DGAF about her, are. Be my guest and test this theory. Been there. Done that. Great results.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 11:03 PM
-1

Ah yes. It got popular because of LARPing..... Why would there be desire for it to work? None of the things RP says about female sexuality are things men want to believe or even like.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 07:58 PM
1

It teaches men that women find alpha behaviors and traits (which include asshole behaviors and traits) , sexually attractive. So yes but to be more precise, it teaches men that the more asshole you are the more sexually attractive you are to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 07:57 PM
-4

The ones that apply it, do succeed. Why do you think TRP got popular in the first place? It works wonders
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 05:44 PM
4

Me too! I don't think it will have the results you expect though.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 04:49 PM
1

They did always ask women too. Just in real life. No one is talking about women's magazines or even feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 09:36 AM
1

Oh no....
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 02:17 AM
1

Yes. I don't see how the comment makes you less wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 02:17 AM
2

Because when people are young, it seems intuitive. Doesn't it make sense for women to know what they want? With age, a man should learn that women are retarded. But that's irrelevant since this is ppd and OP is asking about what women say.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 02:16 AM
1

They aren't questioning what trp says women want. They are questioning what women say women want.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 01:55 PM
1

Fish finds fishing technique preposterous and incorrect 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 01:53 PM
2

Because for a lot of men, what they are isn't attractive to women. How is that not obvious to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 01:20 PM
1

The question is and always has been, what makes someone "charming" to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 01:18 PM
1

It's achievable by ANY man. Not EVERY man.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/24 07:41 PM
1

... Men having a higher libido MEANS that the gender directly influences it. Testosterone is literally a libido enhancer.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/23 06:33 AM
3

First of all, this study did show that men have higher sex drive. Secondly, again, in the study I've shown men score higher in literally every metric of libido. Which, again, should be obvious to anyone over 5 years of age
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/23 01:53 AM
3

None of these studies says anything that indicates women have equal libido to men. On the other hand the one I linked does. See the quoted part.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/23 01:41 AM
8

No "The sex drive refers to the strength of sexual motivation. Across many different studies and measures, men have been shown to have more frequent and more intense sexual desires than women, as reflected in spontaneous thoughts about sex, frequency and variety of sexual fantasies, desired frequency of intercourse, desired number of partners, masturbation, liking for various sexual practices, willingness to forego sex, initiating versus refusing sex, making sacrifices for sex, and other measure…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 09:59 PM
2

Lots of dudes are just boring. Sure. But not because they have no hobbies or interests. They just don't have sexy hobbies or interests.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 04:10 PM
4

Ah, true. Women in the West (regardless of class) obviously have it easier.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 04:08 PM
1

They obviously do.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 09:55 AM
2

If only sex communism was real! ... One dude can fuck 10 women and another zero. I have no idea why you would think women having sex easily means men are having it as easily too.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 09:53 AM
2

Most men are unattractive to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 09:51 AM
1

Out of shape Women are more obese than men. Bums Men make more money than women Abusive Most aren't. Cheater Similar rates to women No real hobbies or passions outside of work I'm guessing this is a joke.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 09:49 AM

Their ability to have sex is limitless, not their libido. Libido is the desire to have sex. "The sex drive refers to the strength of sexual motivation. Across many different studies and measures, men have been shown to have more frequent and more intense sexual desires than women, as reflected in spontaneous thoughts about sex, frequency and variety of sexual fantasies, desired frequency of intercourse, desired number of partners, masturbation, liking for various sexual practices, willingness to…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 01:30 PM
1

Men have more testosterone, a libido enhancer.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 09:25 AM
1

Yes it is. They are basically aroused by the thought of being put in X situations. The attractiveness of the men just makes these situations hotter.Thats why it's crucial for the woman to feel "sexy" while for men it's pretty much irrelevant. "An attractive man finds me irresistible/is dominating me /can't keep his hands off me etc. Etc. "
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 07:58 PM
1

I get how you can disagree with the second statement but the first one is an indisputable fact. I can easily link you decades old red pill forums discussing these things. Even here on this sub This sub is a debate sub. They are debating their position. is straight up not believing what women say (like you just did), because RP men have convinced themselves that women only think they want something How is that a propaganda to convince women? Also, huge mistake if you think red pillers believe the…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 05:38 PM
0

These memes aren't made by women And aren't targeting women. The red pill has been saying this stuff for decades and pretty much EXCLUSIVELY to men. It's just gone mainstream the last few years so more women are exposed to it. I truly believe women actually desire a dynamic egalitarian relationship more than anything else, where the partners are a team and make the big decisions together. I think women think that's what they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 11:46 AM
2

This is kinda reductive. While yes, these behaviors are heavily dependent on the persons character, your behavior and other circumstances affect things too. A good dude might cheat on a girl that treats him like shit for example, or a dude might cheat on a lower value partner and not on a higher value partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 11:41 AM
0

My point is that I don't see how it is a propaganda. I don't think I've ever seen a woman happy to be dominant in her relationship btw
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 10:05 AM
-1

... The red pill isn't targeted towards women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 11:56 PM
7

my friends legit look like super models they are way hotter than me and got shot down Say this out loud and tell me if people start laughing or not : "Single man shoots down supermodel" a grown man should not be shy Yes. Men are robots. if he is shy that means he's not interested enough. Do you not understand what shy means? Any man who has ever been interested enough has aproached a woman. And PLENTY (can't emphasize this enough) of men approach women they aren't interested in beyond a bang. So…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 09:54 PM
9

Is it opposite day or something? All my friends that have approached men have gotten shot down because that's not the way its supposed to be. You think men don't get shot down when they approach women? Your friends approached once in their lives and then decided to call it quits 😂 They probably approached a dude that's already in relationship or waaay out of their league. The more you like the man the less he likes you Again, opposite day. Availability is one of the things men find most attracti…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 08:02 PM
1

Sure. Was the issue that they "didn't fight for it"?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/23 11:36 PM
6

I'm saying there are no feminist problems to solve here.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/23 11:35 PM
12

Sure, but I don't see feminists focusing on the issues of women in places that need it. I see them focusing on the issues of women in the West, which are nonexistent. In the West women are not only equal to men, but actually are favored by the law and society.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/23 02:40 PM
5

and as that has still not ended In the West? How so?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/23 11:02 AM
4

I wonder if that logic applies to the millenia that women were second class citizens. Was the problem that they didn't fight for it?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/23 01:08 AM
3

Ah, makes sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 07:03 PM
1

user base doesn’t really abide by what CMV is What do you mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 03:03 PM

Bitch managed to get divorved before even getting in her thirties. Damn
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 02:41 PM
1

Wait, you seriously don't know what fuckboy means? It's a dude that pumps and dumps women. Women definitely want to date fuckboys 😂 The implication is that women want men to pay for the first date to avoid such men. This obviously isn't what's happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 02:34 PM
2

Are we reduced down to the “dO uR OwNn reeeeeSerch!” How old are you? It amazes me you think I'm hiding a link whose title is openly displayed. https://data.stanford.edu/hcmst I already explained what the link you refused to link said. And I'm asking you to quote me where it says that. I showed that the only chart showed says “online, NOT OLD” and you already claimed. “Uhhhh, same thing!!” Lol. I'm guessing you've ran out of arguments. Now you’re reduced to “what about ism” with dick size? It's …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 02:30 PM
1

... But it's not filtering out fuckboys.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 10:34 AM
1

It encourages meaningful conversation instead of variations of "hello" that will inevitably get lost in the sea of people doing the same thing. So, it encourages better openers? I don't see how that would push relationships vs hookups. And even if it did, how would it maintain profitability? Dating apps make money by keeping people around. So relationship forming isn't really something they want to do. By their nature they are all used for hookups because they are all ultimately looks based, the…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 07:55 AM
4

You can easily find the link. The title of the study is on the bottom of the image. Online means online. I never said it means OLD. For the topic, it doesn't matter whether they met on OLD or Instagram. Did you even read my comment? And 4-7 is the average lifetime partners shown from an actual scientific research and report. Lol, do you also believe men's self reported dick size? It's called social desirability bias. Women lie about their n counts. https://news.osu.edu/men-women-lie-about-sex-to…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 02:30 AM
3

Uhm, the data is right up there? You referenced them yourself too. 4-7 what?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 02:13 AM
3

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1474704915613909 https://akjournals.com/view/journals/2050/14/1/article-p1.xml Study shows that men who commit violence against women at a rate of 18x that of non-violent men are 4x more likely to be fathers, effectively showing that violence has a positive impact factor of 72. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11470503_Males_on_the_life-course-persistent_and_adolescence-limited_antisocial_pathways_Follow-up_at_age_26_years Top 10% of antisoci…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 01:46 AM
16

It accurately described reality. Women finally made sense. I went from thinking they were crazy, unfathomable creature to being able to accurate predict their behavior. This led to better sexual success and easier, better and higher quality relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 01:45 AM
2

men leaving women implies nothing better for the concept of being heterosexual Not really. They are still fucking them. They are just not marrying them. women do dislike misogynists because many of them see Trump supporting and liking Joe Rogan as red flags, statistically. Unfortunately, women have less self awareness than a cat. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6224861/pdf/main.pdf
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 01:39 AM
3

If you actually read the study it showed 40 percent Met but only 12 percent were LTRs No? Where did you get that? (Also notice it says ONLINE not OLD) I don't think it matters whether they met on Instagram vs tinder for his point. It's not organic socializing, it's hitting up strangers online. So: 68 off irl friend groups plus 12 percent OLD (with some possible overlap. That’s 80 percent of LTRs which 20 percent “other” It's 40% online and like 30% at clubs. Friend groups and organic socializing…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 01:35 AM
0

Hinge seems the most in-depth of the mainstream apps in terms of actually encouraging you to talk and get to know the other person. Unfortunately in some places it's pretty dead. Figures How does it force you to talk and get to know each other? but I remember seeing that something like 50% of men on dating apps want serious relationships while 60% of women do. These are actually great percentages. How are women having trouble getting relationships from them then? 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 01:22 AM
2

First of all, that's a prediction, so not really evidence of anything. But I agree with the prediction so I'll leave that be. Secondly, women being single doesn't mean that the women left the men. You could just as easily say that the men left the women. Finally, they don't leave the misogynists.Thry love misogynists and men that act like red pill describes (which is why red pill works so well).They leave the betas.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 01:18 AM
1

women are literally leaving men behind in droves because they're scaring them away with their red pill/Andrew Tate/manosphere BS Lol no they aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 08:21 PM

Yet you'll find women doubting it still. Because this is PPD 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 10:14 AM
1

Lol, I'm quite successful with women don't worry. I don't feel victimized in any way. Doesn't mean reality isn't how I describe it or that you aren't wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 02:02 AM
0

I have no idea how anything I said could construed as "woe is me" so now i see even more evidence for the bad observational skills
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/23 02:07 PM
1

Has never been true in the history of mankind.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/23 07:46 PM
2

As you get older your value diminishes (because men find neoteny attractive,your n count and your personality becomes more jaded) , your competition increases (because there are more women younger than you with every year), your options shrink (because there are fewer single men) and worsen in quality (because the men that are still single, are usually single for a reason). Tell me how in God's name you think age isn't a huge factor for women's dating success. RP doesn't shame virgin or low n wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 11:24 PM
1

the fuckboy life at 40 isn’t going to be respected. There is no age fucking a lot of women stops being bragworthy. Most guys grow up and settle down with a woman in their thirties. Doesn't mean that not doing so is looked down upon.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 11:13 PM
1

But I am too level headed for this place I guess. Or just have bad observational skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 11:11 PM
1

That men don't care about women's n count when determining who to hook up with. It only matters in relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 11:10 PM
1

... If you get the definition you should know what would qualify.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 03:52 PM
-1

Nobody cares about n count for casual sex. N count only matters for relationships It might shock you but fucking a lot of women has been considered brag worthy since the dawn of history.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 03:52 PM
1

You don't know what asshole and fuckboy mean? Most men are relationship minded.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 03:49 PM
1

Assholes and fuckboys. Relationship minded men are everywhere. Women just don't prefer them.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 11:43 AM
3

It's about all single men vs all married men. So yeah, it's not a good comparison.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 11:42 AM
2

These men scream "Fuckboy" from a mile away. Pretending they don't see the writing on the wall isnt helping anyone. Which is why they do manage to get a relationship when they stop chasing this kind of men . Usually during the epiphany phase
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 10:34 AM
1

Yes. But they want relationships with unstable men. PLENTY of men want relationships too.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 10:30 AM
1

Well, no that's not the same thing. These men did have an LTR after all. I'm saying women get with men that aren't stable when young and change the tune when the they see they are running out of time, opting for more stable men. Men usually see the women are "bad" in the situations you describe. But beggars can't be choosers so they compromise. The fewer options you have the more you are willing to put up with.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 10:23 AM
3

You haven't. At best you've been in circles where people pretend to look down on mansluts.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 10:19 AM
-3

With one woman. So, not nearly as admirable.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 10:17 AM
0

They wait too late to start actually vetting for a relationship instead of listening to their tingles.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 11:13 PM
11

Lol. Yes the dude that fucks a lot is looked down on! 🤦‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 11:12 PM

.... Are you under the impression "men are less emotional than women" Means "men never feel emotions"? I've adequately shown that men are less emotional than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 07:08 PM

I don’t know where you get that from considering the crime rates. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/sexual-personalities/201504/are-women-more-emotional-men https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5937254/ https://theconversation.com/men-and-women-experience-happiness-differently-heres-why-104507 Crimes aren't done due to emotionality, lol. Fewer are DIAGNOSED because they’re more reluctant to go get help. The suicide rates don’t actually do you any favors. No, fewer in general. Unles…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 02:01 PM

free therapist and sole companion, Yes. The gender that's less emotional, with fewer mental illnessess and in general more stable is using the emotional, mentally ill gender as their therapist and sole companion. Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 11:57 AM
3

A possible solution would be stopping the government from funding women using men's money. Remove unfair divorce and child support laws, welfare, gender quotas and legalize paper abortion. This will incentivize women to choose more stable men, which will balance the SMP, while not taking any freedoms away from anyone. Stopping the pro-slut propaganda would also help.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 09:07 AM
2

Approximately 81% of men have not approached a woman in the past month. 45% of men 18-25 have never once hit on a woman, and a large chunk of the remaining 55% of men that have approached give up after one approach a year. Is there any evidence that this wasn't the case in the past? Men were never cold approaching casanovas. They got women passively, through work, school, friends, church etc. The problem is that all those venues have been diminished due to the explosion of OLD.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 08:58 AM
7

While I agree, the existence of the online SMP affects the offline SMP and the increased standards it gives women remain.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 08:53 AM
1

It is still there and last I checked using the word "mods" doesn't ping anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 08:17 PM
1

I don't see any ping in the original comment. So unless he removed it, that wasn't the reason you noticed this comment and not the tens of other, significantly more visible, comments circlejerking eachother above.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 03:38 PM
1

No but it really makes you wonder how you managed to notice this comment in the automod and not literally all the top comments in this thread AND still not notice the circle jerk when it was pointed out to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 12:52 PM

They don't really have to pay. Just give the impression they'll commit or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 12:53 AM
1

Literally all the top comments. How are the top 3 comments changing OPs view?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 12:31 AM

... They've been alive longer so they have more experience. Most men make more money as they age. So they are in a better position than they were.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 12:23 AM

Getting your dick sucked tends to feel pretty good so no, it's not seen as humiliating.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 12:20 AM
-6

But they become unattractive old guys with more money and game while the women become much more desperate. Which is why dating is much easier for older men.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 01:12 AM
6

https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/upn3y6/men_care_about_ncountthe_moratorium/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share Men are " immature, retrograde insecure authoritarian weirdo simps" then 🤷‍♂️😂.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 01:10 AM
1

Lol. This is hilarious
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/23 08:12 PM
2

You don't need to verbalize the question in order to find out. Who you fuck doesn't happen in a vacuum and all sorts of behaviors and incidents can make it clear whether a woman is a slut or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/23 12:46 AM
13

Because he was bragging.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/23 12:43 AM
5

Men arent telling women they care about their n count to their faces.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/23 02:04 PM

But they do. Really makes you think why... 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/23 02:02 PM

Yeah, why wouldn't it?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/23 02:02 PM

Not wanting to wife up the town bike isn't being "inhibited". Women are definitely interested in men that care about n counts, which is all men that are worth having a relationship with.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/23 01:50 PM

Women shouldnt hide their n count then 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/23 01:47 PM
1

The moment I realized that one size fits all, the better things went for me 🤷‍♂️ AWALT. Sexuality and nature are, shockingly, shared among people of the same gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/23 01:44 PM
1

Of course not.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/23 02:51 PM
-2

Unironically, yes. Men are the main character. Women are quest rewards
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/23 02:50 PM
1

Why would he want his children to live in poverty instead of maintaining the lifestyle he worked/works for? He wouldn't. But he doesnt need the courts to enforce this just like he didn't need them when he was married.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 10:26 AM

Basically the only reason men marry nowadays (and this it's only benefit) is that most women worth having a relationship with, won't have a family with you without getting married. So, men are basically blackmailed into it. If women would stay and have children with a dude without getting married, men wouldn't be getting married. Granted, I think this is slowly changing since I have met a couple great women that don't seem to require a (legal) marriage to start a family.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/23 10:23 PM
1

It was better for women too. They had higher happiness rates.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/23 04:26 AM
1

So you were most successful at the age range men have been most successful since forever?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/23 04:22 AM
2

Facts.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/23 12:42 AM
2

Based take
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/23 12:41 AM
2

For debate purposes and to see what the buzz was about . Went with the gf. I enjoyed it overall but it was VERY cringey.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/23 10:31 PM
2

Yeah, I don't know whether the people that say the movie was "balanced " saw the same movie. It was the usual feminist drivel with a throwaway male positive message at the end, for an issue men don't actually give a fuck about, after spending the whole movie trashing men and exaggerating imaginary female problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/23 10:09 AM
1

Do you all see what happens when you negotiate with terrorists?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/23 02:04 PM
1

Nope. I'm perfectly happy. Im also perfectly correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 06:39 PM
1

Well, for one the dude is either gay or miserable.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 05:57 PM
0

🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 01:55 PM
1

These are black pillers, not red pillers
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 01:55 PM
1

That too
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 02:52 AM
2

Cuckoldry rebranded.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/22 05:37 PM
1

Depends on the size of the cage right? Not really. Men are able to do whatever they want but choose to focus their lives on extracting sex from women by any means Because it's a need for them. when women are the caged victims of mens unwillingness to control themselves 🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/22 09:55 AM
1

They seem to be more evenly matched. Because the wall forces women to eventually adjust their standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 08:39 AM
5

Good post. Regardless to what the women say now expect them to forget about this in a few days and start claiming that face is everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 09:24 PM
0

A quick search will quickly show you the gender flipped thread has been made numerous times, with women applauding it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 11:58 AM
1

It's about blonde men, not blonde women. Just clarifying.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 11:49 AM
3

If only people were robots...
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 08:38 AM
0

That shes a slut.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 08:37 AM
1

Consider asking him to take testosterone supplements or viagra. It would be tricky to do so without offending him though.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/22 03:17 PM
3

You don't die if you are kept in a cage your whole life. Does that mean that freedom of movement isn't a need?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/22 09:53 PM
3

It's not a necessity but definitely helps. For dudes, of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 11:07 PM
2

No As shown, high n women are on average less attractive. I do think however that more attractive women tend to be more passive on average.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/22 01:07 PM
1

Hahaha, tell me about it 😂 What does this have to do with the study linked in the thread however?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/22 01:44 AM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/d53tvy/is_female_sexuality_actually_a_trap_for_men/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share Interesting...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/22 12:49 AM
1

that they can sleep with AND marry. ... What? Since when? Men have no problem desiring their wives. There aren't women that OTHERS can sleep with that the man wants to marry.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 11:18 PM
0

After a certain n count or particularly whorish behaviour. Double digits is the upper limit for most men to consider you worthy of being in the second group.The lower the better of course. Getting gangbanged will also put you in the first group.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 11:07 PM
4

How I am more optimistic than you after all the bullshit I went through. It's probably because I'm a smart dude. Your pessemism literally ruined my life and made suicidal. You keep repeating that but I'm not pessimistic at all. On the contrary, I'm saying there is a solution FOR THE INDIVIDUAL. I'm just realistic and realize there isn't a societal one.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 10:53 PM
1

Authors JR Tolkien created influencial novels that spans internationally. As much as I adore Tolkien, how has he managed to change society in a direction that the powers that be don't want? I am volunteering in organizations such as mental health org and homeless shelters Thats great. How has that helped society move towards a relationship oriented direction?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 10:47 PM
-1

Ever think about how lifetime unions are structured? Yep. They all have some form of dread OR a woman that doesn't sexually and thus romantically, desire the man.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 10:41 PM
4

Why do you redpillers do these things why the fuck do you challenge blue pillers Where? Here on PPD? PPD is pure entertainment, we aren't trying to change society. As for the rest of the internet, they are offering people individualist solutions, not societal ones. so god damn afraid to really challenge these norms in a deep meaningful way. I'm open to it if you can offer a realistic way to do that. But you won't, because it's impossible.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 10:39 PM
2

You haven't offered any though. A podcast isn't gonna undo the damage social media, feminist propaganda and no fault divorce have done on women and marriage. You can dream for a better world all you want but it's really just a dream.If the problem gets fixed it will get fixed on it's own, not by something you or I will do.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 10:35 PM
-2

Men don't care either. This is a debate sub. We debate things.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 10:30 PM
1

The fact that because birth rates are going down, each generation there are fewer women aging up into that prime age range men like and men do not age out of wanting that female group so with passing time there are more and more men competing for the prime women. Uhm, no? There are even less men born for the same exact reason.So it evens out. This raises another question for me, Is redpill male competition focused enough to address that? Address what? The red pill teaches a man how female sexual…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 10:29 PM
-1

Do you know what it gives? A sense of unease in the relationship. No security Indeed. And security is makes women's pussy dry as the sahara.Which is why dread works. Some women will just dump the guy, Lol no. Then pill guys complain about branch swinging. They complained that this is the behavior they got when they WEREN'T using dread.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 10:26 PM
5

They fixate on the individualist solution because there isn't a realistic societal one.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 10:24 PM
5

There things we can do as a collective actually in a similar way red pill and feminist do which is definitely write articles and create artwork that speaks to the soul. Doing stuff like podcasts and other artistic projects that convey our ideas would work they don't need to be mainstream they just need to strengthen our community. How will these change things when media outlets actively work against these ideas? How is YOUR contribution gonna change things when you barely reach a few hundred peo…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 10:23 PM
-1

Yep.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 10:02 PM
0

It raises questions like sooo is there supposed to be a group of women to be basically concubines for sex and those ones don't deserve love, relationships and marriage that are just there to be used for sex all their lives? Yes. Then the second group that are there to marry at a young age to the older men ready to settle down? The red pill is an individualist solution, not a societal one. Socially you would want these women to have relationships and/or marriage with other men their age or older …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 10:01 PM
2

Collective
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 09:54 PM
1

This does not seem possible given the female population. The red pill is an individualist solution, not a societal one. YOU will be able to get what you want, most men wont.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 09:34 PM
5

What can you do to change things?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 09:31 PM
0

... What pretext? It was a simple question. How the fuck is my meathead understanding this better than some of you? Meathead understanding indeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 09:24 PM
1

Then why am i even answering? Because that's how debating works. It’s Your question to YOUR position. It's a question. An easy one if I may add. Like seriously bro, you are reduced to trying to justify your own explanation to what a strawman is. I'm reduced to trying to explain to you what a strawman is because you fail to understand even that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 08:52 PM
1

How? In what way is it supposed to be representing your position?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 08:42 PM
1

... Yes. Because I'm not claiming that this is your position, which is a requirement for it being a strawman. What do you think "misrepresenting your position" means in the definition?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 08:26 PM
2

I have no idea what about AMALT would cause you to think the things you say. AMALT means that men tend to idealize the women they have sex with when they are in sexual scarcity.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 08:24 PM
1

Are you being obtuse on purpose? I'm not saying it's your claim. I'm saying that the answer to the question will demonstrate how stupid your claim is because of the similarities between the two.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 08:03 PM
2

Yes. Those vile ugly men! Using women left and right!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 07:55 PM
1

How is it a strawman when im clearly saying it's NOT your claim? How is it a misrepresentation of your position when the above is true?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 07:54 PM
1

Strawman:an intentionally misrepresented proposition that is set up because it is easier to defeat than an opponent's real argument. Explain to me how my question is a strawman.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 07:45 PM
6

In what way was it debunked? Newsflash : people still leave the house. Go to college, seminars, classes, partys and meet this way. This will never stop and old will never erase that Completely irrelevant to what we are talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 07:42 PM
1

My question isn't a strawman, which you should already know.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 07:41 PM
1

It's not. But the answer to the question shows the absurdity of your claim. Which you know, so you are afraid of answering.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 07:34 PM
3

They’re known to keep women around for convenient sex. Sexually unsuccessful men are known for that? First time I'm hearing about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 07:32 PM
5

Not only has the OK Cupid shit not been debunked, it's been replicated. Why would I not bring up OLD to show men's lack of sexual selectiveness?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 07:32 PM
1

I wonder why you have such trouble with answering. Is it because you realize how this shows how ridiculous your claim is?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 07:30 PM
1

Oh, I'm not saying it was what you said. Can you answer it though?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 06:59 PM
-4

Someone they can actually maintain sexual desire for.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 06:58 PM
1

Can you answer the question?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 06:55 PM
3

Are sex deprived men known for their high standards in relationships or for their habit of falling for literally any chick that gives them a minimum amount of attention?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 06:52 PM
0

Are men liking women, a fetish?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 06:50 PM
2

Compare how men rated women to how women rated men in the OK Cupid study. Compare how sexually selective males of other species are.Match rates of women in OLD. Partner counts of gay men. Etc. Etc. There is literally no evidence that supports that men, especially those that aren't sexually successful, are selective and PLENTY of evidence that supports the opposite. Which should be obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 06:50 PM
2

Are men liking women, a fetish?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 06:38 PM
2

Im sure you think that but by every metric possible, you are wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 06:09 PM
2

But also love and affection and friendship and other things too. Which is why LTRs work and why LTRs stay together when people get older and bodies do what they do and you still want to be together and still enjoy sex. Yes, none of which have anything to do with the fact that younger women are hotter. If all he’s doing is lusting over “hot chick” and they all “happen to be young” it’s a fetish It's not a fetish. Young chicks tend to be hotter and youth by itself is an inherently attractive trait…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 06:08 PM
5

Men would fuck a boot with a wig. Men don't have high standards.Men that struggle especially so.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 06:00 PM
4

lusting at women purely for their looks and youth .... What do you think men lust in women? Old age and ugliness? I mean what, you think grandpa is going to talk to them about BTS and share a passion for social media? I think grandpa doesn't need to talk about anything to lust after a hot chick.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 05:58 PM
5

There’s no such thing as female nature. Of course. The only commonality between women is their genitals! Apparently evolution stopped at the neck with women. Everyone’s wants/needs are too diverse to believe that following “universal truths” will make you a top suitor for casual sex or hookup culture regular. AWALT.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 05:35 PM
3

.... What makes young women a fetish?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 05:29 PM
7

Did you just call young women a "gross fetish"?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 05:04 PM
1

Yes, men are lecherous. I didn't say anything about women doing anything about it. But men have a very high libido. Sex is a need for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 08:38 AM
1

Why is this not a CMV?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 09:32 PM
1

.... It's not. That statistic is about a different age range. The 27% sexlessness people cite is for men 30 and under, which is the more relevant age. The one you cite is about men up to age 35 , which is after the wall and was about the same in 2018.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 09:30 PM
-2

Holy shit that was a long read. Liked though, kudos.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 01:23 PM
-1

A lot of women's issues in the past were structural in a way men's are not.Solving a lot of them simply meant embracing the full logic of the Liberal Enlightenment paradigm and admitting women as full equal humans. Not really. More like make men second class citizens and fund women using men's money. There are structural issues with men's problems too. Freed from artificial burdens, women may be better adapted to the modern world on average And propped up with artificial supports. Women are net …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 01:21 PM
7

sub focus inordinately on sex. Have you seen a human male? got messages from married men who wanted side action. All with similar caveat of not wanting to change their situations. They even persisted after I told them no, not interested in married men. The ability to compartmentalize was astounding. They love their wives but they also desired longterm sexual relationships. Most commonly their lament centered on sex, or the lack of it at home. Ah, so you have. So why do you think the men on this …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 01:12 PM
3

And also very rare
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/22 09:32 AM
2

It's alien to people that fuck too. You don't talk to a woman you want to fuck like she is a dude. You flirt with her.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/22 09:27 AM
1

Try Guys as a recent example The millionaire?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 12:11 AM
1

... I wasn't stating it as a fact. It was an obvious hyperbole meant to show that men think about sex constantly. Also, no it wouldn't make the fact untrue. It would just make it unverifiable
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 08:53 PM
1

You're projecting it for yourself, not for me. If that was the case why did you feel the need to tell me it's not working. Weird I would say. You're still going on about it, so seems like it was. Flawless logic! Have you ever heard of fuckbuddies, friends with benefits, Open relationships can "sometimes" be purely sexual These aren't relationships. at henry the 8th who would often marry his mistresses. I'm not aware of Henry the 8th marrying a prostitute. Also, is the dude with 6 marriages, of w…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/22 12:10 AM
1

How I mean to you doesn't really have anything to do with you trying to project an alpha man personality online. Doesn't it? Why would I try to project an alpha personality when you mean nothing to me? But I'm glad to know my comment got you in your feelings. Yes, that was clearly a very emotional response 😂 I don't think you understand what a relationship is. A relationship is just sex? If women are constantly falling for it, how is it not a trope? No genius. I'm saying that the trope is women …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 11:16 PM
1

I would say women are more emotional than that
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 10:29 PM
2

I just want you to know that you're not pulling off this whole alpha dude thing you're trying. It's really see through I wasn't trying to. 🤷‍♂️You mean nothing to me. Secondly, if what you're saying is was true, why have high value men (presidents, kings, celebrities) consistently spent their time with hookers, porn stars, .... because they are fucking them. They are disgusting for relationships, not sex. girls who are open sexually? Because these men aren't actually invested in these women. The…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 10:28 PM
1

Nope.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 06:31 PM
1

I'm not a virgin, dude. If sex cured mental health issues I’m pretty damn sure we wouldn’t need any mental health services or medications. You don't need them. Just buy a prostitute Actually a great suggestion. I think men they don’t have sex think sex is the be all end all the happiness when once they’ve done it a few times they’ll realize they feel no different. As a sex haver, I can assure you thats wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 06:30 PM
1

You're still listing things that aren't moral codes or ethics Lol, men don't care about n count because of morality. It's an instinctual disgust towards investing in high n women that evolved due to paternity uncertainty. We don't dislike sluts because they are immoral, we dislike them because we find them gross. Women often value men with similar experience levels Nope.A low n chick isn't gonna reject a dude because he has a higher n than she has. Which you of course already know. Keeping a low…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 06:28 PM
0

In theory, in practice it's not a factor they care about because they didn't evolve to do so. Unlike men, who have been punishing female promiscuity since the dawn of history and across cultures.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 05:17 PM
0

... Why? Do women have to be tall to want tall men? Brave to want brave men? Strong to want strong men? Etc. Etc. Men and women value different things in each other. Men value low ns, women don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 05:12 PM
3

All men want low n women. It's only a small minority that is adamant about wanting virgins specifically
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 04:21 PM
-1

A preference they will quickly forget because it's not something they evolved to care about.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 04:20 PM
-1

Sure. Virgin is just the ideal case. In general the fewer the better
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 04:19 PM
0

The metrics (most commonly testosterone) used to measured a woman’s sexual desire are the exact same ones used to measure a man’s It's not. I don't think any of the studies I linked uses testosterone as a metric.They used actual metrics of sexual desire. So your whole paragraph is pointless. Also, just because female libido is also affected by estrogen, it doesn't mean it's as potent as testosterone. Again, see transgender men. A human’s desire for sex is based on a complex interaction of many t…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 04:16 PM
3

they generally want men with similar religious views. Which isn't the same as wanting a virgin. And regardless, women are very prone to excusing not being one in men because they don't actually care about virginity.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 04:07 PM
1

.... You read these studies and that's what you concluded? Not that measuring such a thing is impossible?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 04:05 PM
5

True but virgin women want virgin men. Virginity is not something women have ever valued in men
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 02:46 PM
4

Spoiler, a lot of virgin women are virgins because they’re not traditionally attractive enough to elicit attention. Sure, some are shy, some are religious; most are simply not attractive. Lol no. https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/c6mrnv/handsome_wants_as_handsome_does_physical/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share Also, chasing virgins is insecure and pathetic af. Why? Men simply find female promiscuity unattractive for relationships. Nothing to do with insecurity, high n wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 02:45 PM
1

No normal man goes crazy from a lack of sex. Again, look at Catholic priests. You act like it’s the be all end all of life being worth living It is for men and has been throughout history. when it won’t make you happy. Pretty sure it would make most men extremely happy. It won’t change the way you feel about yourself or the world Also, false. Men receive a lot of validation through sex. It doesn’t fix depression or mental health issues. It probably will.Try it🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 09:49 AM
1

You would be wrong. It's because they want it SIGNIFICANTLY more. We think about sex every 7 seconds.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 09:43 AM
0

A women can be just as horny as a man & vice versa Not by any metric. This is true even across species. Even transgender men that get injected with testosterone see their libido skyrocketing. Also, unlike men, a women’s sexual desire varies across the menstrual cycle, meaning that women’s desire is periodic rather than weak or limited. It's both periodic and weak. Regardless though, I was talking about myself and my experience, not the experience of the average, non-ovulating woman. And I'm sure…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 09:42 AM
3

Every possible metric of libido in existence. "The sex drive refers to the strength of sexual motivation. Across many different studies and measures, men have been shown to have more frequent and more intense sexual desires than women, as reflected in spontaneous thoughts about sex, frequency and variety of sexual fantasies, desired frequency of intercourse, desired number of partners, masturbation, liking for various sexual practices, willingness to forego sex, initiating versus refusing sex, m…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/22 10:10 PM
5

A woman with a high libido isnt comparable to even a low T man.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/22 09:05 PM
0

I dont
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/22 08:20 PM
0

My condolences.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/22 08:13 PM
0

The audacity...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/22 07:41 PM
2

Hahaha true, but I was referring to general behavior not just rejection.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/22 07:40 PM
0

Have you seen a human male?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/22 07:39 PM
7

Both mature and immature men go crazy from lack of sex. The only difference is how well they hide it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/22 04:24 PM
27

They isolate themselves in mountains, kilometers away from women and spend their days meditating in order to manage to not become fucked up. Their lives aren't comparable to the life of a regular man. Wanna remember how Catholic priests got their reputation?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/22 04:02 PM
16

Completely irrelevant to what I said. I'm saying that men are more distressed by the lack of sex because of their high libidos.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/22 03:59 PM
0

Yep. Men are born pussy addicts.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/22 03:05 PM
9

Well, yeah. Some are male and some are not.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/22 02:50 PM
1

Pardon me for forgeting what sub this is-of course men bear no responsability for their doomed marriages. Kinda. https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/d53tvy/is_female_sexuality_actually_a_trap_for_men/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share Women’s families get crushed By their own hand apparently. Must not be that important to them. raise the kids in the majority of cases That's a good thing. have to fight for child support. They don't. Child support laws are very davorable to th…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/22 02:22 PM
1

Seeking help for your mental health doesn’t necessarly mean you have to take ‘drugs’. It is however what women largely do. But admiting you have a problem and seeking help>pretending there’s nothing wrong and supressing your emotions. Or just solving the problem yourself. Regardless, whether therapy is helpful, especially for men, is very debatable. Shooting three pointers is the type of ‘positive’ risk taking. You can’t tell me you’ve never taken a risk succesfully in your life and then felt th…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/22 11:25 AM
1

Just because you want it to be, risk taking is not irrelevant to emotionality Are people that shoot three pointers doing so because they are being emotional? then the prevalance of intent shows even more. Nope. It's not that suicidal intent is more common in men. It's that the men who attempt to kill themselves have higher intent. There’s no ‘50% of women are on psych meds’, that’s bullshit pedaled with an agenda You are actually right on that. I was misremebering a study showing that 50% of lib…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/22 10:48 AM
1

How can you say there ‘barely is’ academic discourse in 2022 when we’re just getting started to research covert depression in men or alexythimia? Because that's not academic discourse about which gender is more emotional, which is what we are talking about. Negative risk taking is due to emotional dysregulation and positive risk taking is linked to chasing a thrill/emotional high. ..... Or just wanting the potential rewards of the risk more. When a study says ‘talking about emotions’ is a negati…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/22 09:58 AM

Yep, I've been saying it for years (and so were the scientists frankly). The ED young people experience is due to performance anxiety, not porn. People are just having too hard of a time getting laid so they don't get used to the experience and get nervous.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 11:36 PM

You think men don't dumpsterdive?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 11:32 PM

Dark triad AND pro life? Doesn't make much sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 11:24 PM
3

Of course it is. It will never happen after all 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 07:21 PM
2

I hope you arent holding your breath for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 07:16 PM
1

My condolences
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 07:14 PM
-1

I'm not saying they're the same, That was definitely what you did in the OP. Therefore, every time you support a man having sex, you are also supporting a woman having sex. No. Because men and women are different. From an individual point of view when I as a man support having casual sex, I know I'm doing this to the detriment of the women. Because promiscuity is unattractive (for relationships) in women and harmful to their future outcomes while the same isn't true for men. Because we each valu…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 07:14 PM
-1

It does my dear cartoon character. Doesn't mean that men and women are the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 06:56 PM
2

Are women men?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 06:52 PM
1

... You don't know much about statistics do you?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 03:00 PM
2

They literally establish that in terms of raw numbers, the gap isn't large at all. They establish that this was the difference between the survey without the polygraph and the one with it. They don't establish that the polygraph numbers are the real numbers, because they can't. Basically the only thing that's shown is that women lie about their n count even in anonymous surveys. So if a woman has had 5 partners and said she had 3, she's "LYING BY 40%!!!11!" ?? Lol way to attempt to manipulate da…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 02:56 PM
2

The study is from 2003 which is a totally different time. Source that things are different now? And even then, the reported gap between the real number and reported one is small. That wasn't the real number. Polygraphs aren't real. That was just a number that's closer to the truth. Some women undoubtedly still lied. And no the difference wasn't small proportionally.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 02:37 PM
1

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/10707596_Truth_and_Consequences_Using_the_Bogus_Pipeline_to_Examine_Sex_Differences_in_Self-Reported_Sexuality https://www.jstor.org/stable/2090775?origin=crossref&seq=1
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 01:55 PM
1

Survey. This doesn't invalidate it's data in any way. Regardless, the same findings have been replicated in actual studies too.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 11:46 AM
1

... This is a response to your actual point. I have no idea why you are having trouble with this.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 11:23 AM
0

outside of dating apps in real life 62% of US adults aged 25-54 are either married or living with a long term partner. When did TRP say that people arent getting married? TRP is saying that most women aren't attracted to most men. Which is clear from the sexlessness rates and several other metrics. Women hitting the wall and deciding to marry in their 30s is irrelevant. There’s no such thing as an 80/20 rule The ok cupid study (and multiple others) clearly shows women finding the looks of most m…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 10:27 AM
1

You can. The things that make women on average more emotional exist in the particular woman too.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 09:49 AM
1

I read the methodology of three studies and just as I expected, it’s just what we label as ‘feminine triggers’. Like? Risk taking is not the pinaccle of analytical abilities, let’s not kid ourselves here Irrelevant to the topic. It's not an emotion. Also the intent for suicide is higher in male patients. And yet female suicide attempts are significantly higher. Because women are more emotional. If everybody already knew about this, there would be no academical discourse about it in 2022. There b…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 09:41 AM
0

Extreme displays of emotions as punching a hole in the wall, crying after a football game and so on Ah, you mean very rare events? Also, can women punch a hole in the wall? guess which gender gets labeled as showing the ‘negative’ ones Women. Because they display them more. That’s why some analysis of studies from the 2000s won’t convince me, sorry. They won't convince you because the conclusions don't make you feel well. However, what about the methodology of the studies invalidates them in you…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 08:51 AM
1

It is
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 08:37 AM
6

They do.... once they've been run through. Notice how all these chicks already heavily participated in it and seem to tire of it when it's time to settle down? Yeah
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 08:36 AM
1

You can. The things that make women on average more emotional exist in the particular woman too.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 08:30 AM
1

So one study has a sample of 25 people Look at the more than a dozen others that the linked article showcases then 🤷‍♂️ The article you linked gets interesting only in the end when it talks about the impact of socialisation on different cultures. The article clearly shows that your claim that women are less emotional than men is bogus to say the least. I would take these findings more seriously if they detailed what they actually showed to the subjects. Why would that matter? And you can just lo…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 08:28 AM
1

The first article says men and women experience emotions the same way It didn't. men are just quicker at regulating it with a different brain part "First, men may expend less effort when using cognitive regulation, perhaps due to greater use of automatic emotion regulation." experienced the same strength of emotions but regulated it different With men regulating it more efficiently. And the second article is basically saying what the first study is acknowledging is bad - self reported stuff abou…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 08:24 AM
-1

Thats sad
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 07:39 AM
1

Again, this isn't really something up for debate. It's your hormonal profile that makes women more emotional. It's why they are overepresented in every emotion related mental illness (and mental illness in general). Here's a study showing men being better able to control their emotions https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5937254/ Here is a very comprehensive article citing a lot of research, clearly showcasing the obvious. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/sexual-personalities/201…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 07:38 AM
0

I'm very sorry you are so bad at observation. I'm sure it's something you can fix with practice.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 07:29 AM
2

When I get frustrated or angry I cry. And you get frustrated/angry/sad much more often and with greater intensity than men.Your emotions also affect your thinking more. Hence you are more emotional. Women being more emotional than men is something only PPDers have trouble believing,
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 07:22 AM
2

There were actual red pillers. Now it's just women and bloops circlejerking each other
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 07:03 AM
2

I adore women. I just don't like how their sexuality works or find them particularly admirable.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 04:42 AM
1

It did occur to me. Which is why I linked like 10 other studies showing men like that being more sexually successful and attractive by multiple metrics.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 04:39 AM
0

I'm assuming that because of observation. But if you want proof: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1474704915613909 https://akjournals.com/view/journals/2050/14/1/article-p1.xml Study shows that men who commit violence against women at a rate of 18x that of non-violent men are 4x more likely to be fathers, effectively showing that violence has a positive impact factor of 72. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11470503_Males_on_the_life-course-persistent_and_adolescence-limited_…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/22 10:52 PM
3

Men: Wait! How come you still don’t want us? Didn’t you know I’m here waiting to dominate you into happiness? What happened?😢 Except that's not what happens. People that act like OP describes fuck the most.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/22 05:32 PM
1

Female sexuality isn't about lifetime monogamy. It's about SERIAL monogamy. A new dude every few years.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/22 04:55 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter