TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

-SatansAdvocate- Archive

View 0 posts and 13 comments by -SatansAdvocate- on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

He denied her based on her asking to be picked up. Yes, men should offer to drive. Don't be naive; men and women are not equals when it comes to relationship dynamics. Don't pretend you aren't essentially bargaining here, men are not the selectors. This girl probably has tons of guys messaging her, in what world is she going to be concerned with being the one to drive to one of them? Let's be real here. This dude in particular could have denied her drive request in a way that doesn't make him so…
/r/PussyPassDenied28/12/19 08:50 PM
2

Forget the profile picture. Did she really say anything worth "denying"? She made a flirty comment. Guys usually drive and pick up women. They supposedly matched too in order to start this convo, so again, dudes a loser and he fucked up.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/12/19 08:04 PM
2

Seriously, people praising this shit. Dude's a loser. "I'm not a subscriber to gender specific blah blah" shut the fuck up, you giant dick head.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/12/19 08:37 PM
1

Sorry, but that's not true. The last lengthy rebuttle comment is made by a male user with the handle @dedalvs, and he's the one who ends it with the dumb misandry comment. It's not a separate post. Either way I didn't mean to make it out like you trashed the entire thread, just pointing out the ignoral of the valid input part of the comment which you're criticising. I guess the point I'm trying to make is that it's not logically sound to dismiss an entire argument on the basis of an ideologicall…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/19 02:43 AM
2

You willfully ignore the well-rationalized reasoning in the last comment that basically debunks the original one, and attempt to dismiss its credence on behalf of everyone here by pointing out their dumb ideological joke at the end. Don't get me wrong, that ending comment is bullshit and I disagree entirely. But to scrutinize the entire response and leave a comment here saying what you said is willful ignorance by the book. You blatantly avoided the facts, evidence, and reasoning in favour of cr…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/19 10:17 PM
0

It's infuriating that everyone in this thread is ignorantly praising this post without reading the responses. It turns out a lot of what this person said is either incorrect, misleading, or only a partial analysis that omits necessary details which point against their vehement dismissal of any sort of gender-centric linguistic development. The vast majority of us here aren't linguists, and taking the word of someone who purports to be an expert just because their ideological motive lines up with…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/19 03:25 PM
-6

Reading the 2 detailed responses, it seems OP is at best misleading/misinformed and their points are all deconstructed. A rational analysis of the responses points to this.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/19 03:14 PM
-2

Next time try to address the actual argumentative points put forth. Yeah, that last bit is stupid, but the OP that everyone is raving about in this thread had every single one of their points deconstructed/debunked. This comment right here is willful ignorance at play.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/19 03:11 PM
1

What do incels have anything to do with this? You disagree that kidnapping your own kidnapper is a correct course of action? If you have a chance to kidnap the person who kidnapped you, you better be sure to take that opportunity and show them that actions have consequences. /s Your whole mindset is basically people should be free from consequences to their actions unless mediated by the government. What pathetic bullshit.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/19 05:16 PM
1

You have introduced the concept of law into the discussion, which is completely irrelevant. Only the actions themselves are relevant to the OP scenario. You're saying that in my example, it's okay to take an "eye for an eye" because we collectively decided it is lawful to do so. You are claiming there aren't two wrongs because you've justified one of them using the law. This is an adhoc response. If we assume that imprisoning someone is intrinsically wrong, then by u/oxsca's logic we shouldn't i…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/19 05:11 PM
-1

By your logic, people should be able to harass others online and act like assholes without consequence. Public shame and having justified, antagonistic criticisms levied at you is the proper response to someone behaving like that. And how is his analogy poor? You literally just said two wrongs don't make a right, so we shouldn't imprison someone for imprisoning someone else?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/19 03:18 PM
0

Except it's an incredibly toxic and downright wrong view to have. It's based on a brainwashed view of how the world works. Really, just ask yourself if the kind of relationship you want to be in is one where you literally think lesser of your partner and as someone you can just manipulate and "be better than".
/r/TheRedPill17/10/18 02:57 PM
3

This is such an incredibly fucked up thing to believe, that relationships are merely women exchanging their sexuality for men's caregiving. Absolute lunacy. I have no doubt you've never experienced a truly fulfilling and meaningful relationship if that is your true mentality. If you people stopped trying to play elaborate games and just tried to act human with another human, you might have success that isn't based on how many "plates" you get to plow. You have to believe you're better than your …
/r/TheRedPill17/10/18 02:52 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter