TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

-SetsunaFSeiei- Archive

View 0 posts and 230 comments by -SetsunaFSeiei- on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

What is his message that resonates with the masses?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 05:27 AM
3

We plan to travel as well, but I think big international multi-country trips that we’ve done in our late 20s are out, in favour of trips that stay on the continent
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/23 05:41 PM
22

I’d rather enjoy travelling in my 20s then my 50s, I imagine most people delaying kids to their 30s feel the same way
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/23 04:36 PM
1

Build a good career and get rich No one ever laughs at a short neurosurgeon
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/23 12:07 AM
1

Dehydration? How does that help with the abs?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/22 11:00 PM
3

Ok but then you can’t just say “all laws restrict autonomy” as if it is commonplace to restrict autonomy to such a degree
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 06:38 AM
5

I don’t think there is any other law that removes bodily autonomy in this way, if women cannot have abortions they are forced to use their uterus to carry another human being for 9 months, this comes with a number for physiological changes to their body as well. Can you name another law that is this restrictive?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 06:31 AM
0

It’s unfortunate you make so many mistakes then!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/22 04:40 PM
8

Likely only if she was hot though
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/21 01:49 AM
6

How are you blaming the entire gender for not having its shit together when every equity based program in North America prioritizes women, even in fields that are women-dominated?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 05:19 AM
14

Make the woman pay for it if she wants to carry it to term without a dad
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 07:39 PM
3

Birth control might actually contribute quite a bit to this then, since most forms stop ovulation
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/21 07:00 PM
1

So you only go for dinner on first dates? Anyway, it doesn’t sound like you’re dating very interesting people if you never have fun and always feel pressured into sex. That’s why I’m wondering how you’re meeting these guys for first dates
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/21 03:08 AM
1

Do you only go on dinner dates? No fun activities? How are these guys meeting you? Dating apps? Mutual friends?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/21 02:59 AM
1

What if the date was fun, and he didn’t pressure you for sex? Would you still call it off if he didn’t want to pay for you on the first date?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/21 02:55 AM
3

Isn’t this the same as anything else? If you do stuff wrong it doesn’t work
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/21 02:36 AM
4

It’s not that they weren’t “real” redpillers, it’s just that they weren’t very good at it
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/21 01:07 AM
1

What type of cancer?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/21 07:01 PM
1

Finasteride doesn’t work for everyone
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/20 04:21 AM
3

Irrelevant to the conversation about it being an “easy fix”
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/20 04:21 AM
1

Hair transplants are pretty expensive
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/20 04:20 AM
1

Some people like a bit of risk in their lives. It can be thrilling (assuming you get out of it alive and healthy). You’re more likely to engage in this behaviour when you’re younger as well. It’s well-studied aspect of youth psychology.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/20 06:37 PM
5

They often spend months and even years in the relationship and leave when they get bored. How exactly can women prevent that? Don’t be boring
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/20 12:35 AM
5

Test is gear and is more than enough to do what was described
/r/TheRedPill06/06/20 06:14 AM
18

I think he means testosterone
/r/TheRedPill05/06/20 06:54 AM
1

You can do all of this by being common-law. Marriage itself is a patriarchal tradition that most people only go through because they like the traditional aspect of it. And if you’re going to bother to do it, it seems odd to not do it all the way.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/20 07:40 AM
1

Why do you prefer to have your father’s name instead of your husband’s?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/20 07:38 AM
1

If you plan on having children most countries automatically put the father’s surname on the birth certificate so then you have the mother who has a different name than her children. That’s one of the main reasons my girlfriend will take my name when we get married (we’re somewhat traditional so me taking her last name is a non-starter but I suppose that could work for some couples). Edit: oops I missed your last part and see you already addressed that. Idk, it feels weird to us to have someone w…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/20 07:34 AM
0

When you go fishing, do you ask the fish what they want or do you consult a fisherman?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/19 02:32 AM
1

Prior to now Other then TRP and PPD I haven’t really noticed much of a change
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/19 02:23 AM
1

Even when you’re juicing it’s still hard to be “too muscular”. You really need to push yourself and it’ll probably still take a few years
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/19 02:22 AM
12

I was going to comment this exact same thing. It’s like a halo effect or something. People are more careful about pissing me off, they give my opinions more weight... I hate it, but I also love it
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/19 02:21 AM
-50

People don’t get declared innocent, they get declared not guilty. That just means there isn’t enough evidence to convict, nor that he didn’t do it.
/r/MensRights26/10/19 05:39 PM
1

Ahh, interesting. I’d probably still be cruising now if it wasn’t for the damage to my hair. It’ll probably keep me from playing with some of the more fun stuff, at least until I get over it (or have enough money that hair transplants are not a problem)
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 10:57 PM
1

Are you worried about any long term health concerns? I guess your hair is doing fine?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 10:49 PM
2

How come? Low natural levels?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 08:03 AM
1

Are you trt for life, or planning on cycling off?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/19 07:56 PM
6

The only time I’ve ever been accused of steroids is 4 weeks after starting them, when I gained a lot of mass in a short amount of time. Most people can’t tell if you aren’t obscene about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/19 07:55 PM
1

There is very little moral difference between a recently fertilised and totally unfertilised egg. Well that kind of depends on your own individual morals, doesn't it? Why do you get to decide which opinions are stupid and which aren't?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/16 07:47 PM
1

Well, I know there have been studies that show that spouses with similar n-counts tend to have more successful marriages, and I think there's some truth to that. This is really interesting, do you happen to have those handy? I remember this idea being talked a lot about on PPD when I was here a few years ago, but its always interesting to have actual data on it
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/16 03:56 AM
1

Sure, many of my friends are (semi)pro/amateur athletes. Have you dated any of the girls they've slept with?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/16 03:38 AM
1

with a perfect ottermode body Wait TRP thinks this is the perfect body type now?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/16 03:35 AM
2

Because in society men are judged by what they do, women are judged by who they are. For a man to show his worth, he must do something.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/16 03:29 AM
2

This is actually great advice, thanks
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/16 03:27 AM
2

She's bought him if he gets what he wants (casual sex, relationship, etc.). Otherwise its more like trying him on at the store.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/16 03:24 AM
1

What do you think about relationships where the partners have a large disparity in count?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/16 03:22 AM
1

Well I don't spin plates But I suppose I see your point
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/16 03:00 AM
1

If anything promiscuous women would be better at bonding than women with low partner counts. I mostly agree with your three points and the conclusion, but why is this part true?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/16 02:51 AM
1

Hrm. Seems like most plate spinners would be equally bad at bonding. Correct. What is the point you're trying to make?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/16 02:48 AM
1

Out of curiosity, how many partners did he have?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/16 02:46 AM
1

But why is that pattern only for Women then? It's not for only women. This is true for men as well. TRP just doesn't care because they say that you shouldn't be getting into LTRs/marriages anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/16 02:44 AM
2

So its been a while since I've been around PPD, but I've always seen the ranking system used as a kind of "objective" measure of attractiveness (i.e. if a guy said he was dating a "7", other guys would automatically know about how attractive she was). Attractiveness is one component of SMV, but it doesn't make it up in its entirety. Anyways, your market analogy is consistent with TRP as far as I'm aware. For casual sex, where SMV is critical, there are many more men in the market, so women can e…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/16 10:16 PM
3

TRPers think that women fuck up and men fuck down For casual sex, since there is a greater demand from men and a lower demand from women For relationships, you usually observe the opposite trend
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/16 10:04 PM
1

Just out of curiosity, what were the quality of girls he usually had sex with?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/16 05:40 AM
1

--height - at least 6 feet tall, and at least 6 inches taller than the woman he is with with or without heels?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/16 05:28 AM
2

From the point of view of a man, there is no benefit he receives after the wedding, which he does not get from cohabiting before it, or without it. /u/TheLongerCon already listed a few benefits that some (but not all) men may consider important. You didn't address them, so I'll create my own list: Family - My family is very traditional, up to the point where my father was the primary earner and my mother mostly stayed at home to take care of the kids and house (she worked part time out of necess…
/r/askTRP03/04/16 10:54 PM
3

If men go into the sub and give advice that leads to women becoming plates of RP men, instead of becoming wives (which is the goal of the female sexual strategy), and the mods aren't able to ban the men without fear of the head mod taking action, then I can see how they would think RPW may turn into a plate factory.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/16 09:31 PM
1

People who don't really enjoy ONSs would probably remember any individual ones that they've had in their lives
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 02:39 PM
1

I'd say that the RP party line usually tries to be reflective of how society actually acts (as opposed to how it should act, which would be a more social justice type approach). In this case I think it is pretty reflective of society -- if a man is found out to be a virgin, or in general inexperienced with sex, he's often looked down upon and seen as a failure (probably not by his close friends, but by people in general).
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 09:01 PM
5

TRP's argument would be that morality is relative, and if you think its immoral, well you'll just lose out to the guy who doesn't care. So to maximize your chances of having sex, you need to be like that guy who doesn't care -- unless of course it can negatively affect you in some way (e.g. having sex with a taken woman may result in the jealous partner coming after you). To someone who never, or rarely has sex, this can be an enticing argument, because it is in fact that important to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 04:20 AM
4

Should we place more resources into aboriginal women than men? Of course not. And yet when you initially framed the issue, men weren't even mentioned even though it affects then 3% greater -- even if its negligible as you are suggesting, why not frame it as an Aboriginal issue, instead of a women's issue? I'm also not sure why the history should mean that we frame it this way either. Did you even know that this issue affects men greater than women? If you did, I commend you on being informed, bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 05:21 AM
1

Oh, ok. Do you ever skip the asking step, if you're fairly confident that he hasn't slept around much, based on your overall impression of him? Or is this a firm point that you must deal with before sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 04:18 AM
1

Actually, it's not the n-count itself that defines a man's SMV, I think its better to say that its their ability to convince women that they have a high n-count that makes them high SMV. Put another way, if they appear a man who women would want to have sex with, that makes them attractive. They wouldn't actually have to have slept with a lot of women to be attractive though (like if they weren't into hook-up culture).
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 01:16 AM
1

How would you know how many women the man has slept with? Do you explicitly ask this question before you start dating? Or would you make a judgement call based on your overall impression of him and how he acts?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 01:14 AM
1

That's fair. If you don't mind me asking then, how many people as the current guy slept with compared to you (rough estimate if you don't know exact numbers)? Has he ever inquired into your sexual past?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 01:12 AM
2

From his post in r/SRSMen: I've only ever had one girlfriend but we never got physical. It was an open relationship and she had a lot of suitors.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/15 06:20 AM
1

Ah yes, "premed" and "doctor" is a pretty good example. Premeds have lots of potential, but there's still a lot of uncertainty involved.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 09:58 PM
1

even with a 3 digit partner count does she have a 3 digit partner count?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 04:59 PM
1

I honestly don't think so. There is something attractive in "having made it" and "achieving your career" that is not there in someone "with the potential to make it" who hasn't quite "made it yet". I agree in general with what you're saying, but for future reference, I would probably agree with OfSpock that this may be a bad example. Medical school is one of those few things that once you get in, you are guaranteed to become a doctor and make a 6 figure salary - its something crazy high like a 9…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 04:54 PM
1

No. Do you understand what value judgements are?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 05:12 AM
1

Fair enough. Final question -- what pronoun do you usually go by, if you do not identify as male or female?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 08:19 PM
1

Sweet, thanks for clearing that up!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 08:06 PM
1

I've speculated that humans might have an innate drive to find their gender role and do it Interesting. How common do you think this idea is within the trans community? This actually lines up with some TRP stuff, that our gender roles have a biological component to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 08:03 PM
1

That's interesting, and good to hear. I usually feel bad when this type of topic comes up, and I admit that I would probably not be interested in a relationship with a trans woman, but its great that there are plenty of people who are. and transgender men I always get this confused. Does this mean FtM? If so, that's interesting considering his aversion to flesh penises. Also, general questions that I've wondered but have never asked... Do you refer to a person as trans pre-op and/or pre-therapy …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 07:50 PM
1

Have you found that being trans has affected your relationship prospects significantly? You mentioned you are engaged to a cis (I think?) male elsewhere in this thread, was it ever an issue with him? If phalloplasty became cheaper in the future and you were able to afford it, do you think he would be accepting of that choice?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 05:01 PM
1

Didn't Totalbiscuit end up leaving Reddit because of all the hate that was thrown at him? If he decided to ignore his harassment like that, I'm not sure he's a good example to support your point that Anita should accept hers.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/15 02:06 PM
2

Perhaps there's technically a semantic difference, but I think most people would consider those two phrases to mean the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/15 12:44 AM
5

No I got your point, I was trying to make one of my own. He can care about his happiness and hers, and most people who are in LTRs do this. If she's constantly unhappy because of a factor he can't control (loneliness), she's not going to be very fun to be around, and he's likely to be unhappy as well as a result.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/15 12:30 AM
13

Would you be able to be happy if your life partner constantly wasn't?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/15 11:54 PM
1

Talking about it is. You said "Why not just be who you are" right after asking 'Why do red pillers...not talk about red pill."
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 11:49 PM
1

how many years left for the PhD, out of curiosity?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 11:44 PM
2

He's asking a question, not trying to re-interpret her argument. The question logically follows -- if past promiscuity is not a behaviour that can be judged, then there should be no difference between a promiscuous and prude woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 11:40 PM
2

Why not just be who you are if you strongly believe in it TRP would never advise to "be who you are" if it is counterproductive to your goals.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 11:06 PM
3

Do not grab the next lull and tell your story, whether it's with no lead-in or with an awkward "Jumping back a topic...". It was good, now it's awkward and irrelevant. This is great advice. I've seen some chatty girls who will go on and on in a certain topic, and then immediately change it to something else, giving no room for anyone else to breathe. When you finally get a chance to say something intelligent, it's very important to do it in the new topic -- don't go back to the old one, even if …
/r/TheRedPill16/10/15 05:24 AM
2

But now I can see it in your quote
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/15 07:50 PM
0

The man would have to take responsibility for his actions and make sure that any casual sex that he had did not result in a baby.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/15 07:02 AM
1

Ah, fair enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/15 02:08 AM
1

I thought you said you pay for every date?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/15 01:55 AM
1

Money for sexual acts (porn, too) cheapens something that is supposed to be special. And it stifles the growth of men and women. Neither works as hard to become valuable as a mate. Very elegant way of putting it. I agree as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/15 08:43 PM
14

it just has a different philosophy on how to deal with it. That's kind of the most important part though.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/15 08:36 PM
1

Huh, never heard of that form of birth control but it sounds effective.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/15 11:59 PM
1

and after the requisite scolding of my uterus What does this mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/15 11:33 PM
3

What are the practical benefits of marriage that common-law partnerships don't give you?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/15 06:41 AM
1

Which last name would you two give the kids, if you had any?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/15 06:30 AM
0

Nice agree and amplify
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/15 06:27 AM
1

I know one friend who keeps her maiden name for professional purposes, but has legally changed her surname to her husband's when she got married, and uses it for her private life (e.g. Facebook name). Not saying you should do that, but I have seen it done before.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/15 06:25 AM
3

How would you ensure that the children of the ruler remains enlightened and benevolent?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/15 01:33 AM
3

I was just saying we don't have a problem denying citizens their right to vote. But we don't arbitrarily decide to deny a certain group of citizens their right to vote, we remove that privilege if they make it clear that they do not want to follow the rules our society has. Obviously they're going to vote for a government that will give them more benefits rather than what would be best for the country Why do you think that the rich won't vote in a similar manner?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 09:32 PM
1

That depends on what you think consider to be important qualifications for a party leader. I think that charisma and relate-ability (especially to a younger, more progressive demographic) are pretty important qualifications for a Prime Minister, and while there may be more experienced Liberals, I think he does a pretty good job of representing the party. I don't know why it would be ridiculous to claim that Trudeau put in the work to get where he is -- he didn't magically jump to where he is now…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 09:28 PM
3

So taxpayers who are on welfare don't have "shit at stake"? What is at stake for the wealthy that isn't a concern for the people on welfare, that you feel should give them the universal right to vote? We don't have problems with felons not being able to vote. I'd call this a false equivalence, but I'm not even sure which trait you think "taxpayers on welfare" and "felons" share.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 08:30 PM
4

I don't necessarily disagree with anything you've said, but I'm not sure how it supports the idea that the changes we've seen over the last two centuries were bad. The founding fathers did the best they could, but I can't imagine that they intended their own values and beliefs to stay around forever. Our current society had a different set of values and beliefs, and our philosophy of governing reflects this. I'm sure in 200 more years, we'll have changed even more (if we survive that long).
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 08:19 PM
3

What system of voting would you subscribe to then? Or a dictatorship/monarchy?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 08:09 PM
4

automatic -3 SMV points if you don't have blonde hair and blue eyes, "that's just how the world works"
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 08:08 PM
7

I know you're being sarcastic, but I don't see the problem in recognizing that times change, and with it comes a change in cultural attitudes, norms, and what one considers to be a proper philosophy of governing. Just because something worked 200 years ago, it doesn't necessarily have to be the sole arbiter of how we do things today.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 08:03 PM
2

He's also spent years within the party, was already an elected MP before becoming the party leader, and is popular among the people. I understand that we don't want to create dynasties of families that rule, but it seems silly to discount all the legitimate work that Trudeau has done as a politician.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 07:58 PM
3

That's only a problem to the people who don't need the "money goodies". But why should the system always favor the richest people? A democracy is a system that fights for the benefits of all people, and in fact protects minorities from the majority.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 07:55 PM
4

Surely if we limit voting to a certain group of people, the politicians will instead promise benefits to that group of people. The rich will just vote in favor of policies that benefit the rich. I don't understand the rationale for this, given that democracy is supposed to benefit everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 07:53 PM
1

It's a pretty sound fiscal policy. Economists love relatively small deficits like the one Trudeau is proposing, it's only the public that recoils in fear.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 07:51 PM
6

Why should taxpayers who are on welfare be restricted from voting? Which problems do you anticipate this would solve?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 04:11 PM
2

Is this a controversial statement? It seems reasonable to conclude that the men who most identify with (and so support) feminism are those that don't feel like they fit in with the traditional view of society, i.e. gender roles.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/15 05:17 PM
3

I pretty much agree with everything here.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/15 03:48 PM
1

I don't see things like "mak[ing] yourself as attractive you can be" and "mak[ing] your wife realise that you are unsatisfied, and to give her a taste of what she might expect should you ultimately leave" as disrespectful to the person you are applying dread game to. I think those are both reasonable actions that people who are unhappy can and should pursue -- assuming of course that communication has been tried and has failed. The harder forms of dread (like actually flirting with someone while…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 04:40 PM
1

dread game is not a sound technique, though. that's all I'm trying to say. at its base, it's about disrespecting someone I guess I just fundamentally disagree with this then.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/15 03:27 PM
1

to answer the rest of your questions, if your intimacy needs aren't being met, and you're still attracted to your partner, and you have absolutely tried to communicate with each other, then it's over. I think this would probably be the most prudent course of action if you were not married, and I believe TRP is for it as well (see: their concept of "nexting"). It would probably be much more difficult to apply this to a marriage though, since divorces are often messy and painful (and can sometimes…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/15 05:22 AM
1

And as I explained, Step 1 only seems to necessitate itself when you are no longer getting sex. Sex is your ultimate motivator, not being a good person. You are implying that so long as you are getting sex in your marriage, how you look or perform is of no importance. I think it's important to realize that emotional and physical intimacy is pretty key to an individual's well-being. A lot of our happiness is predicated on this, especially if you live in a 1st world country where all your basic ne…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/15 02:45 PM
3

Alright, I'll concede that I may not understand the perspective as well I thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/15 06:31 PM
2

Except that she also wants the sex. But in a committed relationship. So she does want both. Don't the FA men also want both commitment and sex? My point is that they're both missing out on one of the aspects. You've got to remember here that these are sites, built by men, around the concept "I just cannot get laid, no matter how I try" and therefore a women turning up and saying "I can get laid whenever I want, but I'm just like you because..." is not really going to fly. This is fair I suppose.…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/15 06:26 PM
1

Secondly, A friendship, orbiting or not, is not a fucking relationship nor even close to it. I agree, I made a mistake there, see my edit. The FA women can get love and sex, the FA men are going to die without any woman even willing to spit in their direction. There is no comparison here. The FA women will get love and sex if they lower their standards, correct. The FA men will as well, but neither wants to (and neither knows how to effectively improve themselves). There are more than enough FA …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/15 05:44 PM
6

I think FA men will have no problem being an orbiter of a women several points above him. They just don't want that (which is fair). EDIT: But I think I see your point about using the word relationship, which this sub takes to mean "both commitment and sex". I probably should have made that clear, was considering changing it but it didn't make sense, so I'll leave this edit here.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/15 05:20 PM
6

So... FA men cant get sex or relationships.... And FA women can get sex, but not relationships and that is the fundamental asymmetry. I think this misses one of the most basic tenets of TRP: Women are the gatekeepers of sex, men are the gatekeepers of relationships. FA women can get sex easily, but can't get commitment (the sex zone). FA men can get relationships easily, but can't get sex (the friend zone). FA men don't even recognize them as relationships, because there is no sex. Likewise, FA …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/15 05:10 PM
10

And finally, posts that address an issue that has been beaten to death here, and offer no new perspective, arguments, content, a connection to a current event, and so on will be removed. This is good, but I think we should compile a list of quality threads or posts that discuss some of the more common topics, so when the mods remove the post, it can be presented to the submitter. I think this would be useful because the most egregious examples of this issue are new people who come here and immed…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/15 04:57 PM
2

Yes, there really are. Unattractive guys also think this, because a lot of times their matches don't end in a hook up. I have gotten into arguments with both of these groups, where they insist that Tinder can be used "just for making friends." It boggles the mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/15 11:03 PM
0

I believe the current idea is that there's a difference between gender identify and gender expression, and you can do whatever the heck you want for either of those things and its all ok and normal. Both of those are of course distinct from sex. Honestly, it's a bit weird. Don't ever take a sociology course if you can help it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/15 04:15 PM
5

She's a troll, dakru. Don't engage.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/15 07:02 AM
2

Before recent changes, a common Tinder method for guys was simply swiping approval on every girl, then vetting those that bothered to respond. Is this not effective anymore?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/15 11:50 PM
2

I agree with you, my end goal is a LTR or marriage, I am merely pointing out that current TRP thought is consistent with your point that men cannot suddenly become loyal husbands after playing the field for years. TRP essentially counters feminism's sexual liberation for women with (strategies for) sexual liberation for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/15 02:43 AM
4

Was there a point or argument that you were also going to make?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/15 02:32 AM
7

They'll have a lot of difficulty going into "loyal husband" mode. Agreed, which is why TRP suggests that men do no such thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/15 02:31 AM
1

TRP talks about several sexual strategies, all of them amoral. Are the actions from all the sexual strategies discussed amoral? Morality is subjective, so one person may find certain acts immoral, while others may find them morally permissible. But doesn't the fact that they can be moral or immoral mean that they are not amoral? What I find the most frustrating with this topic is that any discussion of morality with any sexual strategy is immediately met with "sexual strategy is immoral!", as if…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/15 11:59 PM
5

From this it follows that discussions on morality is relevant to TRP, as they lead to the discussion of consequences on other conscious beings. But all such discussions are dealt with viciously, often called "tone policing" and met with immediate (temp) bans (there's a stickied post right now that talks about it).
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/15 11:38 PM
5

It's perfectly possible to subscribe to and read TRP and remain firmly in the first camp It's possible, but people are much more frequently encouraged to implement the immoral (from a traditional BP sense) techniques over the moral ones. In fact, those that try to make moral arguments (which are still relevant to decision making, even if the knowledge itself is amoral) are often banned for tone policing, or with cries of "sexual strategy is amoral!"
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/15 11:35 PM
3

But they are teaching knowledge, and knowledge is amoral. So how can it be immoral? If the members of TRP consistently used this knowledge for morally permissible things (using a BP view of morality), people would take much less issue with TRP. It is because many in TRP use this knowledge in ways that BP finds immoral that there is an issue. You mean are the actions wrong or harmful, as the knowledge is amoral. Correct. TRP both teaches knowledge about sexual strategy, and also encourages immora…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/15 11:32 PM
1

How does one argue with them? I'm usually able to concede that our culture and upbringing contribute to what we view as masculine and feminine, but then they go on about how it's all made up, and we have the power to change it if we only tried. It's usually coupled with some very toxic views on masculinity as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/15 04:54 PM
0

Yes, feminists consider gender and sexuality to be two distinct concepts. Transsexuals are a bit confusing, the general idea is that they don't experience a gender identity consistent with their biological sex (i.e. they feel like a female, but have male sex organs). I'm not an expert though, so I'd advise you consult other resources to get a clearer picture.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/15 02:11 AM
2

Do you believe that gender is 100% influenced by our physiology, or do you believe that our culture and upbringing can influence it as well, even if it plays a minor part?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/15 12:31 AM
0

Feminists differentiate between gender and sex. The former is considered to be a social construct, while the latter is biological. Gay/bi/trans is a reflection of sexuality. While there's lots within feminism that I don't agree with, I do not see the inconsistency here.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/15 12:28 AM
2

I've always heard that it decreases your libido, you make emotional connections but don't want to have sex. That's mostly been from anecdotal experiences though so I may be mistaken. I was mostly surprised that it was being thought of as a date rape drug, as a person under MDMA is quite functional and wouldn't be taken advantage of -- if they had sex, it would be because they wanted to. However, giving it a second thought, I've seen people get really messed up with they combine it with alcohol, …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/15 12:49 AM
1

Put Molly all in her champagne, she ain't even know it/ I took her home and I enjoyed that, she ain't even know it, But Molly isn't a date rape drug. If anything, she'd be less likely to sleep with him...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 01:57 AM
3

I knew multiple people who wanted to go to medical school, and they got in, because literally all they did was work work work. Yup. I went to school with a lot of premeds as well, and this was definitely apparent. Most of them were quite sociable and really cool people as well, they just didn't have spare time to go to bars or clubs on the weekends (if they did, it would be for a special occasion, perhaps 2 - 3 times a semester at most). They would just all be too tired from studying, completing…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/15 09:34 PM
1

Oh, interesting, how does the "health check" work? Physical exam? Tests that show negative for STDs? Is there a legal requirement to get yourself tested after a certain period of time in order to keep your license/ability to work?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/15 03:46 AM
2

Yes men ask for lots of unprotected services. The answer is always no. Herpes is an STD that you can get even while using proper protection. How have you managed to avoid contracting herpes so far in your life, given that you've estimated having between 300 - 500 partners?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/15 03:36 AM
2

I see, thanks for answering my questions.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/15 12:23 AM
2

Is this typical practice for your co-workers as well? About how many more years do you anticipate working in this profession before you won't be able to anymore?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/15 12:07 AM
2

$500-$1000 a night. Elsewhere you said around $1000 a week. Was one of these a typo, or is $500 - $1000 a day the most you would usually make in one day, with the average being lower? EDIT: And how many hours a week do you work to earn that money? Standard 40 hours? Much less? Is this the typical for prostitutes? Lower/higher end of the scale?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 11:47 PM
0

Basically I'm purple because there are consequences to my dignity for being blue and consequences to one's criminal record for being fully red as I understand it. +1
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/15 09:00 AM
1

The best discussion sub would be r/FeMRADebates, there are lots of "moderate" feminists there who routinely debate with MRAs.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/15 02:50 AM
1

I have to say, your analogies are always really interesting to read.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/15 02:47 AM
1

Sure but a lot of women can maintain their beauty in their early 30s. To a degree, sure, but she's competing with women younger than her, so she's not going to get first pick like she would have in her 20s. Choosing last sucks. Are women supposed to only date guys much older than them ? I agree that a 40 year old man won't be appealing to most 20 year old women. But an age gap of 3 - 5 years is pretty reasonable, and men in their late 20s definitely think about marriage. Heck, I know a few guys …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/15 01:11 AM
1

It's been mentioned a few times already, but you need to define what the strategy you're proposing is trying to achieve. TRP suggests that women have a dualistic mating strategy, i.e. AFBB, and there are often complaints that they find different men to satisfy the two different needs, but the highest quality men will actually display both alpha and beta traits. If a woman wants to find such a man, it is in her best interests to start looking when she has the most to offer sexually, i.e. when she…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/15 01:22 AM
1

That's how you get spoiled brats. You get spoiled brats by being a bad parent.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/15 05:31 AM
1

Ideally it should be a cycle. Your parents instilled great values in you, so you work hard to be a good parent and instill positive values in your children. Key point is the value of legacy -- your children will only be motivated to be a good parent if they buy into this idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/15 05:28 AM
1

Slutty Flings, Virgin Rings This is great, I'm surprised I never heard this before
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/15 05:16 AM
4

He grew his company from a small one-desk office to a multi-million dollar enterprise. The family didn't start from wealth, the father was middle class, and was able to build his family up to the 1%. OP is explaining what kind of family dynamic has helped contribute to that growth. It's also pretty arrogant to claim that you're out "solving the world's actual problems", whatever that might entail. You may be doing some really great work, but to automatically assume that anyone from wealth is sit…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/15 05:09 AM
2

"Too much happiness, too much money, do not want! My children will work hard to barely get by and they'll like it, thank you very much!"
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/15 05:02 AM
1

Men did not create patriarchy and are not directly responsible for it. I don't think I've heard this view before actually. What does feminism say created the patriarchy?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/15 01:29 AM
1

if every woman hits this wall then doesn't that necessarily mean that the man she "locked down" in her early twenties will stop being sexually attracted to her as well? Only if she made a bad choice. Some men (those that are all alpha with no beta qualities) make bad relationship prospects, so it is up to the woman to pick the best possible man that she can get. She has the greatest power to choose when she is in her 20s. After she hits The Wall, her attraction diminishes, so she will have to se…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/15 03:17 PM
2

Do you want to have kids, or anticipate wanting to have kids in the future?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 02:07 AM
1

Ha, ok, fair enough, I can't speak for all MGTOWs so I'll concede the point. What did you think about the other stuff I said?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 01:55 AM
2

This topic came up a while back, and one thing that stuck out to me was what HHL (who seems to have deleted her profile?) said. Something like "the richest in society are those who create strong stable families and pass on their wealth from generation to generation, the poorest in society have children out of wedlock, raise a child as a single parent, etc. Why would anyone want to emulate the poorest of our country, and not the richest?" marriage holds people back Personally I believe that it pu…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 01:42 AM
9

They don't have to contain themselves to a subreddit, they can publish articles in magazines, blogs, newspapers, etc. complaining very publicly about how there are no more good men (Where have all the men gone!).
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 01:23 AM
1

Oops. Fixed.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 01:08 AM
1

I have seen men leave stable, fulfilling relationships with good women (or cheat) because they suddenly got an itch to fuck new women. Or was this meant to be tongue-in-cheek given that no 'perfect girls' exist? Perhaps you need to find better guys then. TRP (rightly, in my opinion) claims that a lot of women aren't worth committing to, but the same is true for guys -- people are shitty, and you need to actively work hard to find someone that you want to be with for the rest of your life. Person…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 01:04 AM
2

I wish you had posted earlier, as this is an excellent summary of TRP's position and deserves to be closer to the top.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 12:31 AM
1

Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 12:29 AM
1

Perhaps its just been a long day at work for me, but I'm not too sure what you're talking about. Could you rephrase?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 12:29 AM
2

forced Once again, TRP doesn't believe women (or anyone) should be forced to do something they don't want to do. They just believe that women who are chaste and young are usually higher value than those who aren't (whether they actually are is a debate for another topic, of course).
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 12:27 AM
3

I don't want to be there when she's finished having her fun (late twenties-early thirties) and wants to settle down and start a family. Slight correction, if I may. Most guys interested in LTRs actually do want to be there with the girl when she's finished having fun and wants to settle down and have a family, they just want to also have that fun with her when she was young and hot. This is at least my goal. I think this was what you were implying, but I think this clarification is helpful for a…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 12:19 AM
4

Sex should be given once commitment is reasonably secured (if one is aiming for an LTR). Strict rules in this regard aren't advisable (the rule of 3 quoted below is a decent guideline for novices, but does not have to be adhered to), as they don't allow for the nuance that all human interaction is subject to.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 07:45 AM
24

Will you look back at your life from your deathbed & think, "Damn, I really should have denied myself the pleasure of sex for all those years because maybe I would have found a 'better' man to commit to me"? I doubt it. I think I've found the disconnect. Men aren't hoping that women deprive themselves of something they feel they need, they don't want women to have regrets in their life. The type of women who thinks she's been denying herself pleasure by saving herself for her husband isn't someo…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 07:40 AM
2

One benefit that a sexually conservative woman has in the SMP is that she is able to choose first. High quality women and men tend to pair off rather quickly, and most women deserving of LTRs will already be there by their late 20s -- by the time they've reached the wall, they've already chosen a high quality man (someone possessing an appropriate balance of both alpha and beta traits) who will commit, most likely for life, and they end up being happy. the truth is, modern men – no matter how hi…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 07:22 AM
4

But then you'd actually have to follow through with that
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/15 01:20 AM
1

I think that relationships in general work better if one of the partners is responsibly in charge/leading, and it's acknowledged and accepted by both. I don't believe it has to be the man in charge. There are submissive men out there who are happy being so, although there are probably very few. The argument that TRP takes is that the woman would be more unhappy in this type of relationship. I'd agree that there are probably outliers though.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/15 09:51 AM
2

I think he's using "normal" to mean "not from 4chan" e.g. newfags, to use the appropriate terminology. I agree that its not bigotry because its not targeting gay people, but it is most definitely meant to be toxic.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/15 09:38 AM
3

This advice strikes me as more red pill than that shit in the other thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/15 02:47 AM
10

His idea <- Your head <-
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/15 10:06 AM
2

For me personally I'm interested in using the TRP toolset to find a good 23 - 27 year old high value woman for marriage when I am 25 - 30. TRP explores different options, and has come to the conclusion that plating women instead of LTRing them in today's western society provides the most benefits to men. I agree, but that doesn't preclude my own personal goals and my using TRP ideas to achieve them.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/15 02:52 AM
1

Haha, I'm surprised this post is still sitting at +1, 8 hours after you made it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/15 02:26 AM
0

Halfers are always good looking though, even if its a race that you normally wouldn't be interested in, so don't be too surprised it got you. Makes sense as well from an evo psych perspective - more gene variety = better children.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/15 05:55 AM
3

kills it for anyone with nostalgia "it was always better when I was young/in the old days" kind of mentality I guess. I feel it sometimes as well when I see modern takes on stuff I used to love as a kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/15 06:15 AM
1

where to find Indian girls, especially Am curious, can you link to posts or provide some details? 5th, btw, no idea so many other Indians browsed TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/15 04:40 AM
3

Unrelated, but, what happened to your old account, if I may ask?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/15 08:19 PM
1

Option B. Assuming a high value woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/15 03:53 AM
1

You can get pretty much anything you want out of a guy by being good looking. Not if he's redpill, hopefully. Remember, this is about RPW game, not your average slut game, the women are actually trying to attract high value males.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/14 03:01 AM
1

Uhh you got that I was parodying the typical BP response, right? lol
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 07:20 AM
13

And no, I would not let Ryan Gosling put it in my butt either I believe you just answered your own question.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 03:19 AM
5

If the people who criticized TRP would instead explain the correct way to talk to women, how to be attractive, what to do with their life, and put it into a sub, they would easily break 100K subs, no issue, if they got advertising. "Just be yourself"
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 12:20 PM
1

are you saying women with high SMV would tolerate being plates? I think you're conflating "high SMV" with "high LTR value." A woman's SMV as defined by the manosphere is how attractive they are to men. There are many women with high SMV that would be terrible LTR prospects, and many low SMV women that are good LTR prospects (possibly because they don't have the SMV to attract guys and so never slept around). There are of course also high SMV, good LTR women. why would a red piller admit to hooki…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 11:24 AM
1

Many individuals who browse TRP condone cheating. Some don't, and were too loud about it, hence the current stickied post on the sub. (Personally, I think it's wrong as well and wouldn't pursue taken girls) Red Pill theory does not concern itself with whether cheating is right or wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 10:52 AM
1

It's in the sidebar at /r/TheRedPill. I would suggest reading up on Red Pill theory first before making threads, if only so that you can be better informed and create better discussion. People have their own personal morals and live by them. TRP does not discuss morality, only strategy. Basically, it's up to you how you use the amoral sexual strategy discussed.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 10:41 AM
2

What does Robot9001 even mean lol? porn isn't the problem, people are the problem. how they act and behave towards someone just because they had sex on camera. that's the problem. those same people jerk off to porn all the time, then dhumanize women and shame them for doing porn and Porn isn't bad, you are. She didn't suffer consequences, she was bullied to death by people like you. There's nothing bad about porn, it's beautiful, nice and awesome and it provides a public service to society. Ok, …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/14 10:47 AM
1

I've heard terrible things about that board, maybe I'll go check it out soon haha
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/14 10:29 AM
1

Blue boards are SFW, yellow are NSFW (porn, gore (not seen very often), pretty much everything is allowed except for blatantly illegal things like child porn). You'd probably be interested in /pol/, they have their own version of red pill. Have fun. EDIT: maybe /r9k/ as well
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/14 10:28 AM
4

I recently (1 year ago) started lurking 4chan, and I think that it really desensitized me to hate and vitriol in general. When I first started browsing /r/TheRedPill, I saw some of the more hateful stuff and kinda just laughed, but didn't take it particularly seriously, and was actually surprised at how angry people were getting at what anonymous people were saying on the internet. I bring this up because you said I have never met anyone that is nearly as salty as those on the TRP sub. If you we…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/14 03:47 AM
2

Serious question, have you ever browsed 4chan?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/14 12:04 AM
1

Fair point.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/14 04:04 PM
2

ONS women are not my type. But people post about TRP working with LTRs as well. There are people on /r/TheRedPill who are only looking for LTRs, and are having success. Then he hasn't been with many women. There are multiple experts on TRP, some who have experience fucking hundreds of women, others who have had great success in marriage. The common factor between them is that they all follow TRP theory in their relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/14 01:24 PM
3

Some RPers probably do have that opinion, but keep in mind that not all people who follow Red Pill have a clear understanding of all of its ideas. Check out this post by an endorsed (and usually very level-headed) contributor on the sub, /u/Whisper. It's currently the top voted comment in this PPD thread: http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/2ojivc/uwhisper_on_why_debate_is_pointless/ Copied and pasted for your convenience: Who is the intended audience for AWALT? Who is this admonit…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/14 02:04 PM
7

Or it could actually be that he didn't like the idea that she wasn't a virginal Indian girl, like his culture expects of women. I know you seem to think that it's a far-fetched assumption, but the point I'm trying to make is it's much more unlikely he was convinced of any RP ideas, and more likely that he just didn't like that past behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 04:27 PM
2

You've obviously chosen him over your own blood, I'm just curious as to why. Which you answered haha.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 03:33 PM
6

Really? I find that most RP are men already broken with a bad experience with women. Most people in happy relationships (who are heading toward marriage, no less) would laugh at the blatant "misogyny" that permeates RP. I just don't buy that any sane man (who was considered marriage material by Nikki and probably her family) would completely turn their world view of women around by talking to a 22 year old for a few hours. Do you?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 03:30 PM
3

Oh. You can ignore my question from the other thread then, I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 03:10 PM
1

nvm I misread your comment
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 03:06 PM
2

It's entirely plausible and likely he didn't care and it didn't bother him until the brother came down to Texas and framed everything bitterly. You certainly have a lot of faith in red pill's ability to convince a man who is about to get married that marriage is a terrible idea for him.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 03:03 PM
1

I completely agree with this, and I'm actually kind of surprised at all the RP responses that are willing to throw their family under the bus.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 02:58 PM
5

But then why would you care if a beta man gets locked up by your sister/cousin? You don't owe him shit. You've obviously chosen him over your own blood, I'm just curious as to why. I usually find myself agreeing with you and the red pill people on the sub, but on this point I think I would probably do whatever is it the best interests of my family.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 02:51 PM
1

The complaint isn't when a girl leaves a guy for another guy (thereby dumping him, which is what nexting is), it's when the girl cheats with a guy while still in a relationship with her current beta boyfriend.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/14 05:35 PM
5

Yes, changing yourself just for sex is pathetic What would the other option be then, if you currently weren't getting sex? I'm not asking to give a "BP" answer or anything, just, what advice would you give to someone who confessed to you that he was not able to get any sex, but wanted some? If you workout and being attractive is a bennefit that you're happy about, that's fine. If you wouldn't otherwise be working out, then that's pathetic. I guess my confusion then is why does your statement wor…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/14 02:54 AM
6

Changing yourself merely for sexual reasons is pathetic, in a way, whether you're a man or a women. Change for purely sexual reasons suggests desperation. Sex owns you, you don't own sex. Is it really fair to say that it's pathetic for someone to try and change themselves for the chance at having sex? Like, if someone wants sex, but they're not attractive, becoming attractive would improve your chances of having sex. Why is this frowned upon? I guess your argument would make sense if the guy see…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/14 02:02 AM
2

This is a very interesting discussion, but I think you're focusing a bit too much on abuse and the assholes who inhabit /r/TheRedPill. At its core, Red Pill theory is about truth in how the majority of woman respond to different actions. Abusive people (or those who have been abused before and want to "get back") may give abusive advice, but there's no real advocacy within the theory itself - it merely states that for woman that are harder to handle (you would describe them, probably accurately,…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/14 02:37 AM
1

Most people don't know how to wear it right. I'm curious. How do you wear it right?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/14 02:21 AM
2

I treat 3 year olds differently than I treat 9 year olds, who I treat differently than 16 year olds, who I treat differently than 23 year olds. Surely this makes sense - you wouldn't respond to a 3 year old the same way you do to a 23 year old, would you?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/14 01:58 AM
2

Context matters though. Often times, a message can be interpreted in a certain way because of the format, medium, or singer. I mean, your interpretation hinges on knowing Taylor Swift and her past as well, would it change if it was a different artist?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/14 07:51 PM
5

It's insulting because you treat teenagers differently. They are not adults, I do not treat my teenage brother and his friends the same way I treat my university level peers because they have different levels of maturity. So to call a woman a teenager is to call her immature, not fully developed, and not worthy of being treated as an adult.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/14 07:11 PM
15

Use archive.today next time, don't give clickbait clicks.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 06:22 PM
2

Well...yeah. I used to not care about those things before university, and then I started dressing better, getting actual hair cuts, and I noticed that it was a lot easier to socialize. I would definitely think that all of those things count.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/14 10:42 AM
3

This exactly. I know a few girls who told me point blank that they would never date their own race (a lot of them were brown, some were Asian), this is the type of person you want to avoid if you are that race - they don't suddenly "change their minds," they just hit the wall.
/r/TheRedPill21/10/14 01:56 AM
1

I think the general rules include posting your own opinion first to explain why you feel a certain way before someone can try to change it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/14 08:55 PM
4

It makes the breasts look bigger/better. Large breasts are attractive to males. Therefore she's tricking the male into being more attracted to her then he otherwise would have been.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/14 08:52 PM
3

I've been a garbage man for 40 years. Fuck you. That's the current top rated comment in the thread, with 286 people upvoting at the time of this post. Obviously not all of TRP accepts the analogy presented, so it's a bit unfair to use it as a representation of Red Pill theory. To answer your question though, beta qualities are attractive for LTRs and marriage, in fact they're required for them to be successful. It just isn't likely to be a happy LTR if all the male exhibits is beta qualities.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/14 08:41 PM
3

Gamergate explained in 60 seconds or your money back: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipcWm4B3EU4 Basically, the movement is about ethics in gaming journalism, and so you actually shouldn't care in a normal world if you don't play video games. The only reason it's become mainstream (and why you should maybe pay a bit of attention now) is because the cause has been co-opted by SJWs and feminists to spin a narrative of female victimization (anyone surprised?). It actually has nothing to do with Qui…
/r/TheRedPill19/10/14 09:56 AM
2

I always thought people hold in their farts to be polite because a. it's rude to make someone smell your shit , b. people would lose respect for you because it's not appropriate etiquette, and c. I wouldn't want to have sex with a girl farting around me so I assume she might feel the same, but I didn't realize I was manipulating girls/people in general by holding in my farts. The reasons you listed for holding farts in are correct. However, irrespective of the reasons, the point being made is th…
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 07:20 AM
9

She's famous.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/14 02:22 AM
7

I think he was saying that society has fallen apart since the '60s because women have become less traditionally feminine and "gone on strike", proving your point.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/14 07:42 PM
6

What's your background with her? If she's asking to crash on your couch with no intention of sex, I'd say she already considers you friend zoned and you've lost your shot with her.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/14 07:46 PM
3

Then you've got the slippery slope argument. What if another admin comes along and says "I think everyone in /r/theredpill are a bunch of morons who can't provide anything of value to the world, I'm going to ban them." Obviously its your site so you can ban whatever you want, but the reason that Reddit has become so popular is because as long as you don't do anything explicitly illegal, you can always create your own community and be with like minded people. This is the actual reason Reddit admi…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/14 06:15 AM
0

Why, I have a bookmarked link about a woman justifying how it is the correct decision for her to not have had sex with her husband for the past two years. Wow, I'd be interested in seeing this hamster in action.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/14 10:09 PM
2

the lowest smv race (Indian) Semi-unrelated, is there an agreed upon ranking of SMV by race?
/r/TheRedPill23/09/14 07:01 AM
2

Would this still apply if you're purpose is looking for an LTR and eventually a marriage? In that case, wouldn't the woman signal herself as a potentially better mate if she didn't succumb to pressure after 1 date?
/r/TheRedPill19/09/14 07:49 AM
2

Indeed, the poster I was arguing with just couldn't comprehend what I was saying. This just doesn't exist for him. Does not compute. He keeps going on about money and providing. She's not saying women should fuck men with alpha characteristics. She's saying that women, if they want to, should only date and not marry men who don't look like they want to be active fathers. This does not translate into alpha. You're right, he probably shouldn't have chosen that method of argument, but as I mentione…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/14 07:42 AM
2

I think you're getting caught up on details here. In this case, its not the fact that the beta is the one paying money that's important, but the fact that he is a father, as you emphasize. RP says that alphas don't make good fathers (LTR RP requires that you throw in beta behaviour in there to keep it going). Therefore, if you read between the lines, the author of the article is saying that women should fuck the person with alpha characteristics, and then marry the person with beta characteristi…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/14 06:52 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter