TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

-Xav Archive

View 1 post and 51 comments by -Xav on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
15

General-Xav/r/MensRights27/02/18 12:22 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I sleep well, thank you. And nothing wrong with princesses :)
/r/MensRights28/02/18 08:39 PM
1

Sry, my fault.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 08:24 PM
1

Oh... that's nice. I've got quotes from millions of Feminists #KillAllMen. Or maybe the plethora of feminist academics that have literally advocated for androcide? And now we can generalize all feminists but not all MRA? Seems hypocritical. Yes, that means you agree with them. I mean, you can prove me wrong and post where you are arguing against them, or arguing specifically for men's rights and equality and show us that you aren't banned, but you won't... because you can't. Ah of course, let's …
/r/MensRights28/02/18 03:30 PM
1

Throwing shit is helpful because dislike and hatred of feminists is the primary unifying feature of the MRM. I would describe it as a reactionary movement, with men’s issues as a secondary goal. My primary goal is to solve mens (and partly women's) issues. Seems like I'm in the wrong place for that then.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 03:14 PM
2

Personally I think throwing shit at feminists is a fun and useful activity. Well, then I think that's the point our opinions differ. I'm more for nuanced, intellectual honest discussions with other people instead of throwing shit at other people.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 02:13 PM
1

Certain behaviours like? Breaking up gender roles so everyone can live in a family like he or she wants?
/r/MensRights28/02/18 10:52 AM
0

Scientific research, the vast majority of all trans people and our society as seen in dictionaries or media calls them trans, a minority of Trans-people and biggots call them tranny. Sure seems like you don't understand basic courtesy.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 10:51 AM
3

Originally I came to ask why there isn't a /r/AskMensRight. Instead of answers people started throwing shit at feminists. Funny isn't it
/r/MensRights28/02/18 10:48 AM
1

Strawman. MeToo is a movement that's some good, some bad. The ability to ruin a man's life without presenting any evidence whatsoever (like what happened to Brown in Canada) is absolutely terrifying. There are legitimate things that need to be said in MeToo, but they need to be backed up with evidence, not just mob justice any time someone makes an accusation. That's literally a quote from an MRA from this very sub. 8% of rape allegations are proven false. Just 8%. 3% (according to RAINN) of rap…
/r/MensRights27/02/18 10:52 PM
1

Like I said in the other thread, I'm still forming my opinion and don't know enough yet to form a valid opinion. Still, here are some things I've noticed today that I'm critical about: The stance on #MeToo MeToo is just modern sorcerer hunt (Also I have no clue why its written in big letters) The problem of false rape allegations. At least in Europe it seems pretty blown up. The general tendency to paint feminism as some kind of bogeyman who is at fault for so many things while there is a good a…
/r/MensRights27/02/18 10:15 PM
0

You don't need anyone to do that for you
/r/MensRights27/02/18 09:45 PM
1

When you use Google it is available, if necessary I can provide a link.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 09:44 PM
1

But since you are here to argue against the MRM Your basic assumption is wrong, I'm not here to argue(even if it's part of the reasons I'm here), but also to learn, to critically question, to see opinions from all sites to prevent echo chambering and last but not least, yes, to argue. and you can't find any positions in the MRM to argue against... it stands to reason you agree with the positions of the MRM. I tend to not build my opinions on 2 discussions I had with a handful people on one after…
/r/MensRights27/02/18 09:26 PM
0

So I agree with you that the Duluth-Model is unjust and DV against any gender is a problem and you understand 'i don't care about victims of DV because they are male'. I mean what the fuck. How can someone misread that badly?
/r/MensRights27/02/18 09:13 PM
0

Ah of course. I also didn't argue against 'the world is flat' so that's probably a thing I believe in.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 08:59 PM
0

Wow, thanks for the long post. While we can discuss these topics they don't really prove 2/3 of the statements made. 1. Feminists don't care about the problems that men face, And 2. TERFs, they hate men and want female supremacy For things like the Duluth-Model I'm pretty much on your site. Same with Koss, but so are some feminists (and I'm saying some, because some is more provable than many and I guess if I say many you want proof for the 'many')
/r/MensRights27/02/18 06:50 PM
0

You've stated you believe in equality of opportunity, not equality of outcome. Yes, so? That's a thing not only MRAs stand for. You've spent a good portion of the day arguing about feminists, not the positions of the opinions of MRA's. Okay, but not arguing about positions of opinions of MRAs doesn't mean our opinions match. You are only defending feminism (and one person's statement that many trans people prefer to be called Trannies). Just to clarify (you probably didn't intend to mean it but …
/r/MensRights27/02/18 06:38 PM
1

Ok, I take it back and now it's the turn of you MRAs to prove these statements. Would be redundant to discuss on a false premise, wouldn't it? Feminists don't care about the problems that men face, some feminists are strongly against mens rights(eg: TERFs, they hate men and want female supremacy).
/r/MensRights27/02/18 06:12 PM
1

Where exactly do our opinions match? I have used a good portion of the day discussing with MRAs because I don't agree with their opinions.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 06:01 PM
1

Yep, in the same way gravity was false before Newton and there wasn't any evolution before Darwin. Have a nice day, I'm out✌️
/r/MensRights27/02/18 05:54 PM
1

You - playing the victim card in a humble brag kind of way. I simply couldn't not care less about your sexual status, it adds nothing to the discussion - but there you are playing the card. You realize that there are in fact completely straight completely cis queer activists? I said it because in my work as an activist I've had this discussion multiple times and all the time Trans-people said they don't want to be called tranny. But once again you demonstrate that my paraphrase of your statement…
/r/MensRights27/02/18 05:51 PM
1

I can't have this discussion about if to use tranny or not and how it is handled in /r/Askfeminists because I apparently don't know about bill c-16 or title 9? Have you thought about the fact that there are more continents than northamerica? I'm just tired of people not only moving the goalposts but apparently stealing and driving away with it. If you want to have a discussion about if it's ok to use tranny as a general description of Trans-people and if /r/Askfeminists approach to people who us…
/r/MensRights27/02/18 05:45 PM
-2

I don't think so. I have met many feminists who were for equality of chance and many MRAs who were just trying to satisfy their rageboner. I decided to stand only for my own opinion, and only for it and not for any movement, organisation, government or anything else. When people want to share my opinions, fine, but I won't share their opinions 'back'.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 05:37 PM
1

That's probably because I don't tell Trans-people what they are allowed to want to be called.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 05:33 PM
0

Yeah no There are many Transorganisations in many countries with different languages and I wont go through the hassle to make a list for you, I have better things to do
/r/MensRights27/02/18 05:32 PM
0

I don't have an opinion on theses studies yet, but if women do less well under conditions where gender is eleminated as a possible cause im ok with that. I'm for equality of chance and not for equality of outcome.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 04:54 PM
1

Seems like we made different experiences and apparently also have different facts. Agree to disagree Take care, too :)
/r/MensRights27/02/18 04:43 PM
0

God why are you using the same argument over and over and over instead of actually reacting to the arguments I gave you?
/r/MensRights27/02/18 04:42 PM
2

Says I and they decide for themselves as seen by the fact that nearly all Transorganisation oppose this slur. You could also look at mainstream media like Wikipedia, Facebook, news sites, dictionaries, queer activists and so on.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 04:41 PM
1

People telling you to reconsider the use of a word and mods on Askfeminists are hurting the first amendment (which does not even exist in Canada) because politicians make bills in Canada that may restricted freedom of speech? That sounds rather ridiculous. Out of curiosity: What exactly speaks against adding gender identity and expression to the list of protected classes?
/r/MensRights27/02/18 04:35 PM
1

No -Xav, it is NOT ok that you get to use sweeping generalities I agree, that's why I don't make sweeping generalities, as seen by my use of "majority" or "most" instead of "all" and "every-" and your personal experiences while simultaneously discounting other people's experiences. Like I wrote above: neither my personal experiences and his personal experiences mean shit. Logic, proof and common sense are the things we should use in an argument. If you take a minute and read my statements instea…
/r/MensRights27/02/18 04:26 PM
-3

"We're going to discriminate and hire women until we reach this quota" Where exactly did you get this quote from?
/r/MensRights27/02/18 04:09 PM
1

I'm not saying tranny being a slur or not is a men's rights issue, I said it's shocking that people who apparently advocate for my (mens) rights are at the same time so intolerant and lack social awareness, basic respect and self-Reflexion. So I had to Google the first amendment because, guess what, not everyone is from the us it has English as their first language. So this is the text: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; …
/r/MensRights27/02/18 04:00 PM
3

Ah ok, thank you
/r/MensRights27/02/18 03:33 PM
1

So the CEO has been the CEO for 15+ years but the company changed the CEO 3 times in a year and a half? Care to clarify?
/r/MensRights27/02/18 03:19 PM
1

My fault, I switched up /u/Hillary_for_Prison and you
/r/MensRights27/02/18 03:16 PM
1

Facebook is shaped by culture and Wikipedia is open for anyone who wants to edit an article. Sadly there aren't any statistics on it, otherwise I would show you that most of society sees it as a slur. And no, you can't simply use an term that's commonly seen as an insult for a specific group of people as a description of said group of people even when the vast majority of these group of people says it does not want to be called this term because it is insulting and demeaning. That's just basic r…
/r/MensRights27/02/18 03:12 PM
1

I think /u/deciples was rightfully banned for not being respectful by using slurs. Not being an asshole is broadly accepted by society to be the ethical thing to do and the mods at /r/Askfeminists do not have to tolerate such people in the same way this sub doesn't has to tolerate me for my opinions. I have the freedom of speech and other people have the freedom of not listening. The original point was that moderation at feminist places is beyond strict to the point of creating hostility toward …
/r/MensRights27/02/18 03:03 PM
-14

So the male CEO was replaced by another CEO who was better qualified and did a better job and happens to be female and now you think it's some kind of conspiracy because you had diversity training before it happened? Have you thought about there maybe not being any discrimination at all? Maybe the HR just established more fair guidelines for hiring like anonymous applications.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 02:54 PM
1

Dude even Facebook and Wikipedia see Tranny as hate speech, it doesn't get more mainstream. Your opinion is like "I know some humans who self-identity as assholes so it's ok to call you one". I'm not even a feminist, only really shocked about what kind of people "defend" my rights
/r/MensRights27/02/18 02:41 PM
-8

Feminism? :'D
/r/MensRights27/02/18 02:33 PM
0

Again it's also you tubers who are trans, So? How many Trans-people are YouTubers? 0.001% probably. These YouTubers don't represent Trans-people in general. and the fact you are an activist means nothing. Exactly, and the fact that you know Trans-people who self-discribe as Tranny's means nothing. Have you spoken to all trans people? No, did you? Maybe you have a statistic about how many do like being called tranny. Even if tranny is not the term you like I have seen "activists" attack trans peo…
/r/MensRights27/02/18 02:30 PM
-1

Maybe through some MRAs actively searching for the smallest things that support their view and then mentally feeling good about their perceived moral superiority as seen in these examples: np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/80ju1d/watch_leftist_students_freak_out_when_panel/ np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/80hihy/space_exploration_is_just_men_spreading/ np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7uem8u/socjus_how_malefeminists_are_reacting_to_grid/ Also the strawmanning and the toxicity that's in …
/r/MensRights27/02/18 02:12 PM
-5

The majority of all Trans-people sees Tranny as an insult, so do most lexicons and dictionaries. Trans*People self-discribing as Tranny doesn't make the use of it any more ok than black people using nigger makes it ok to say nigger in general. It's a complicated topic, see this article for more informations :https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reappropriation . Tranny being a porn category for a stereotyped, oversexualized and objectified image of Trans*People also isn't the best argument for it. I'…
/r/MensRights27/02/18 01:44 PM
-7

Well no wonder that you are banned when you use slurs like tranny. Being respectful is one of the few rules. For the #MeToo Movement: Give me reasons to criticise it and proof for your statement and I will criticise it.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 12:55 PM
2

From what I gathered /r/feminism decided it is a place for feminists by feminists and outsourced the discussions because they became to much so that the mainfunction of the mainsub is not impaired. Seems like a legimate thing to do.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 12:49 PM
-6

That's not really true. I criticised feminism, questioned if we needed it, criticised feminist theory and told individual feminists they are intolerant or their opinion is stupid. I'm still not banned. Downvoted, yes (same on this sub), but I'm not banned. I found that the mods are as neutral as possible when they act as mods.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 12:46 PM
0

Like I said, they are taken seriously, you are not based on your opinions. And rightfully so.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 11:35 AM
-1

In general feminists are taken more seriously than MRAs (one of the reasons could be that feminists actually do more activism than most MRAs do) and you obviously grasp at straws when your only critic for feminists is based on something that's obviously not meant serious.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 11:20 AM
-2

Feminists don't care about the problems that men face Do they have to? some feminists are strongly against mens rights(eg: TERFs, they hate men and want female supremacy). First and foremost TERFs are against Trans*People and they are not that widespread or even accepted in most of the feminist movement. Just go and ask some feminists what they think about TERFs.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 10:53 AM
9

You realize they are not that serious in this thread? Well, probably not.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 10:47 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter