TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

-radical-dreamer Archive

View 0 posts and 28 comments by -radical-dreamer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Depends on the thing she did and the relationship otherwise. If everything else is perfect, I could let anal slide. Threesome? Never. If she at least tried it once with someone else, she can try it at least once with me too. As for revenge, I don't see leaving someone as revenge.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/19 08:59 PM
1

It is an interesting observation. Not being from USA and having only read about that racial shit (though I've met two or three chicks who were openly talking about wanting to try black guys), how do you explain Asian women going for white men?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/19 11:57 PM
1

Settling means being with a person you don't want to give your best to.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/18 10:18 AM
2

Yeah, I don't hold it against her. We are still friends, in the sense that split was amicable. But girl not swallowing on its own isn't a deal breaker (as long as she gives head). What is a deal breaker is that she clearly cared more about pleasing those men than she cares about pleasing me and I'm not OK with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/18 08:39 PM
1

What if the girl then told you that she gave head a lot because when she was younger, her first boyfriend made her feel like it was expected or else he’d dump her. And then she found that all men seem to have this same expectation, and got mad that they didn’t get as much head as her previous partner, so when she was younger she gave it because she thought she had to. And then, as she got older, she realized she didn’t respect herself or her partner for demanding this, so she stopped. This actua…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/18 07:58 PM
1

a lot of people dont want to hurt the others feelings so they dont mention what that issue actually is. I think that this is what happens in all cases, though real issue is they simply aren't as sexually attracted to their current partner. EDIT: At least in all cases that don't have reasonable explanation, like public sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/18 05:28 PM
1

I wasn't asking for examples, I was asking why wouldn't you do it if you know it would make your partner happy and you've done it before, even though you don't enjoy it. For example, public sex explanation is totally reasonable (view I agree on, though I don't give a fuck about the law, but more about how fucking cameras are everywhere).
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/18 04:58 PM
1

Genuine question, if you legit enjoyed and didn't mind those things in the past why don't you do them for your partner? Like, I have plenty of (non-sexual) things I have grew out of and have 0 desire doing again, yet I don't think it would be big deal doing it if someone I care for asked me to.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/18 04:42 PM
3

So... slut for others but not for me? Next.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/18 09:51 PM
5

No, its things that I've experienced and observed. In my estimation, it happens in one way or the other in at least half relationships. Or are you saying that women don't make guys wait on purpose(something even most bloops don't deny) or that most women are at their most sexually adventurous with their LTR/husband?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/18 04:19 PM
10

Its not that hard to understand, they just really dislike what that implies, so they do their best to hamster it away.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/18 12:56 PM
11

I'd say that marrying a girl who slept with other guys on the first date and made you wait is much worse than marrying a girl who slept with you on the first date and with other guys on the first date.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/18 08:56 AM
5

Way to miss the point. What I'm saying is that AF are guys she is into fucking and is physically attracted to. BB are attractive for other criteria, therefore she treats them worse sexually. She makes them wait in order to get to know them, she fucks them with less enthusiasm cause she just isn't as attracted to them (doesn't have anything to do with love, or total state of relationship), she doesn't go out of her way to satisfy their kinks cause she knows they won't leave if she doesn't, etc. Y…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/18 08:53 AM
1

I'm not sure I understand the question, but if its if I would judge her negatively (for LTR) for putting out on the first date, then the answer is yes, though how much is depending on other things. But it isn't a dealbreaker.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/18 09:49 PM
27

Bonus Q4Men: Would you also prefer a girl that you'd see a future together not sleeping with you from the first date? If she has a history of sleeping with guys on the first date, I don't see a future with her if she isn't willing to do the same with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/18 08:14 PM
8

Your strawman of AF/BB doesn't ring true in most cases, though it does happen rarely. But, you have described actual AF/BB. Woman can be genuinely attracted to and loving to BB. AF/BB doesn't have to be premeditated and done to screw over the guy (though it often happens). To put it simply, AF/BB is treating casual sexual partners better (sexually) than treating guy you are in LTR/marriage with, aka giving them less while demanding more(instead of casual partner it can also be short term relatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/18 10:00 AM
1

With friends gym, drinks, craft beer, football every Sunday, very rarely video games or something like paintball. ​ With partner/s drinks, walks, tv shows/movies, cinema, art galleries and shit like that. ​ People tell me I'm interesting, but its mostly because I don't give a fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/18 10:08 PM
2

You do realize that only conditions for above written to be true are that her n > his n and that she has been so infatuated by a guy once in her past that she was willing to go past her comfort zone to please him (or was experimenting or whatever). I know of a case where its true and her (alleged) n-count is 4.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/18 04:37 PM
2

Didn't say that. She is probably attracted to him (unless she is total gold digger, though that is unlikely with slight difference in income), but she was more attracted to guys she had casual sex with who were unwilling to commit or who weren't type of guys for LTR. EDIT: Also, worth adding, she might be attracted to different qualities in guy she chooses for stable LTR, which lead to things I've assumed about their sex life. And those same qualities are causing that guy to have lower n-count t…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/18 04:18 PM
2

As I said, I don't usually judge people I don't know shit about, but assuming they are in relationship/marriage and he isn't in top 20%, yeah. Exception could also be if they were in LTR since highschool or something like that, but odds are against that. I'd say that my assumption holds for most couples.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/18 03:35 PM
4

Well, hypergamy has kinda become a catch all term around here. Either way, I am not in the habit of judging couples I see on the street, unless something really sticks out (or one or both of them is hideous), but I'll play your game for this imaginary couple. Given the info, I'd say we are talking about classical AF/BB. In my educated guess her n > his n. Probably made him wait for sex and jump through hoops, while having history of sleeping with hot guys earlier on. Also is unwilling to do all …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/18 01:27 PM
1

Who are you to decide what Red Pill should and shouldn't do? If you feel like there is need for movement to chase NAWALT exclusively that doesn't exist, no one is stopping you to go ahead and create it. And if men decide to follow it, in place of Red Pill, then you are correct. Otherwise, this is just concern trolling. What TRP needs to do now is abandon the strategy of men improving themselves to win over hypergamic women. The operative term being "to win over hypergamic women." No, the operati…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/18 12:08 PM
1

Well, if you look at purpose of Red Pill, it is by men, for men in order to give actionable advice in order for men to do better in existing world. It is locker room talk, if you will. Opposite to that, feminism is movement that tries to induce social change, their all men rantings have no purpose, other than to vent (or even worse, to change how laws and institutions treat men) and are published.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/18 08:01 AM
1

As I said, not all woman are literally like that. I personally know at least half dozen women who aren't like that. I don't know how much of red pill you have read, but AWALT gets compared to treat all guns like they are loaded often. Sure, all guns aren't loaded, in fact, most guns aren't loaded, but if you treat them as such, you will avoid getting hurt or hurting others, so its a useful heuristic. Similarly, not all women are like that, but AWALT is still very useful heuristic. As for compari…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/18 11:05 PM
0

Wouldn't call it unhelpful derailing in a thread about how men and women don't understand/empathize with each other. But I do think that women here (and elsewhere, if they hear about it) take AWALT out of context, literally and/or personally, which completely misses the point. It is heuristic. It isn't mean to explain ALL women, but it is useful as taking its advice will lead men to better outcomes than if they ignore it. Also, I am willing to bet that confronted with it 9/10 women would deny it…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/18 11:26 AM
0

I don't think understanding is a problem. Sure, some people are totally unaware and they could use it, but the problem is that often men and women have completely opposite goals. No amount of empathy or understanding will make a woman who wants commitment happy if her man is unwilling to commit or make beta bux happy that his gf/wife used to give alpha fucks more, while demanding less. Opposite to that, if man from my first example commits he won't be happy and woman won't be happy if she feels …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/18 09:09 AM
2

The hotter one. On a more serious note, woman A sounds better to me in every regard. Woman B is OK, but too much work. I know for a fact that I would never be with woman B if I found out she was like A in the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/18 08:32 AM
4

This post reads like something opposite from /r/iamverysmart. Maybe /r/iamveryemotional should be a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/18 11:28 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter