TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

007700 Archive

View 3 posts and 51 comments by 007700 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

In regards to your question in the title, I would say the answer is yes. Hopefully you've read Rollo's posts on male love and female love. They are two different, incompatible, kinds of love. RP community accepts both definitions. But, intuitively speaking, love involves a connection, i.e. two disparate essences united as a single whole. Such a whole would be verbally expressable by one concept alone, not two. The fact the RP accepts and demands that one internalize to self-contradictory definit…
/r/TheRedPill09/04/16 05:29 AM
2

Not Kantian. Hegelian, i.e. absolute, ethics. Kantian ethics is included within. The problem with Kantian ethics is its abstract formalism, i.e. the Categorical Imperative, relies on set of universalizable maxims that need not apply to real concrete situations. For example, lying is wrong, because if all lied, then no one would have a reason to speak, given that speaking is, presumably, some attempt to establish truth. Suppose, however, you are a German living during the Nazi regime, and the Jew…
/r/TheRedPill07/04/16 02:07 AM
1

You're making a good argument. You're attempting to get at the heart of why men follow RP, and what results. In a sense, you seem to be saying that the consequential character that one will develop from having an RP mindset in the long term is present in the kinds of situations RP teaches men to avoid. One develops a certain mindset. How you present this idea, which may be very useful, is unclear. Please present your central points more clearly. If you wish, PM me, your polished argument.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/16 05:28 PM
2

Start your own campaign then. Or is life nothing more than sexual dynamics.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/16 02:05 PM
3

You mean the boyfriend was right there? Unbelievable.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/16 04:51 PM
2

Do not confuse the magnificence and number of Christian architecture with the magnificence and number of Christian souls. The Master is great because of his strong will, i.e. the good condition of his soul. In a sense, his soul his his building, and indeed the Germans have a word for this: Bildung. The slave is not great due to the opposite reasons.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/16 05:33 PM
1

This statement is as patently false as claiming a car cares about you or a rock cares about you or your house cares about you. Your analogy falls apart when you recall that Nature is made of both inorganic and living organic matter. A car and a house are made of inorganic and dead organic matter, thus lacking all the living dynamic character of Nature. It ebbs and flows, i.e. undergoes cycles of growth and decay. Further, Nature as a whole is not a tool for man to use; the converse is true. we w…
/r/TheRedPill30/01/16 05:24 PM
1

Do not confuse Nature with feminized society. Feminized society does not care about you, as a man. (Edit: Nature cares about you.) Nature not only cares about you; it is designed to force you to reach your full potential. We can see this by means of examining the law of physical population growth, P(t)=rP×(1-(P/K), where P is the size of a population over time, r is the growth rate of a population, and K is the enivornmental capacity for growth. Environmental capacity effectively refers to limit…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/16 06:42 AM
1

Rebuttal of mid-summary: To state that Nature does not care about a human being reaching their full potential is dogmatically Darwinian. It sounds cool but has no basis in reality. One need only look at the exponential nature of population growth, via the constraints set on population growth by law of population growth, and hence the idealistically unlimited propogation of one's genetic code. Second, the Solow-Swan model on technological growth again shows this same constraint. In essence, all b…
/r/TheRedPill28/01/16 01:50 PM
1

It's a double edged sword. Secularized Christianity is also the philosophical underpinning behind the seemingly unlimited technological development experienced in western society. The beta is twins with the very gadgets we are using to describe them and discover their true nature. This idea originates in George Grant's short essay "Thinking About Technology".
/r/TheRedPill28/01/16 01:41 PM
1

Math is not leprosy. If presented right it wins you respect.
/r/TheRedPill23/01/16 03:16 AM
5

You should write an article on this. Elegant. True. Mathematical even.
/r/TheRedPill23/01/16 12:43 AM
1

See reply above. Im helping you out.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/16 11:46 PM
1

Yes the law does vibrate. It forms an inversion of itself and is usually expressed by transcendental, periodic, functions like sine x. The vibrating selfsame law that becomes differentiated from itself while remaining an identity IS self-consciousness.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/16 11:46 PM
3

You can't convince the animals.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/16 11:43 PM
0

Good work. Be aware that you cannot turn all the animals. They are born to be ruled, for there are some concepts they are unwilling to depart with.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/16 11:43 PM
5

This is occult stuff. Whoever wants to know pm me.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/16 05:00 PM
8

That is absolutely foolish. Even if such a Chad did exist, you presume that his confidence was not beaten out of him by a familial and social upbringing that demands his obsequeiousness. Only those who were unable to be educated will resist such conditioning. Would you say that an inability to be educated, in the sense of refining and perfecting your instincts, is a sign of superior genetics.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/15 03:13 AM
1

This is only a problem because we assume that we need ignorant betas to be defacto slaves, forced to work not through fear and intimidation, but through making them ignorant of the true workings of the world. A similar kind of situation occurred in antiquity. The abundance of slave labor in ancient Greece and Rome prevented the technological revolution that we saw in the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries, even though they had to technology and knowledge to do it. Hell, they were a few steps away fro…
/r/TheRedPill05/10/15 01:50 AM
0

you have to define "rights" more precisely in order to answer this question adequately. Let us define positive right and negative right in the usual way. In terms of positive rights: they have the halo effect. In terms of negative rights: they have the right to not be conscripted into an army. Notice that these kinds of rights are sub-linguistic, i.e. they are beneath the matrix of all (spoken) verbal statements that make up the political system. These rights are not endowed upon women by any ma…
/r/TheRedPill05/10/15 01:39 AM
5

No. This is different. Caesar behaved like he did without being consciously aware of it, so he did not assign terms to the kinds of behaviour he engaged in; i.e. he did not assign terms like "amused mastery" or "frame". Those are modern inventions, and like all words, carry with them certain connotations that they point to, like mastery, a picture frame, control, etc. These connotations all involve a presumption that we are aware of technological control and mastery of nature, something which th…
/r/TheRedPill29/09/15 02:52 AM
3

The right feeling is associated with understanding a concept. If a logical statement does not "feel right" to a female, its just because they don't understand it. This shows that females also cannot distinguish between feelings and thoughts; you can change your thoughts, but you can't change your feelings. You can't change reality either. Feelings are reality. Doesn't matter if the thought does not conform...this is a very primitive worldview, its as if the women ceased to evolve at some point.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/15 01:03 AM
2

It's deeper than that. Much deeper. Remember that many who swallowed the pill used to be beta. Working harder on mental and theoretical aspects, with enough persistence for a long enough period, leads to a point where one does it better than the naturals, naturally.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/15 11:06 AM
14

The issue is not over whether it is true or not that assholes get laid more than nice guys; it is over the use of terminology that identifies individual A as asshole and individual B as nice guy. The terminology is female centric, and the very use of the words signifies an implicit surrender to the female imperative because the terms are female centric. They are created for females by females, and only used by men because that is how they see females verbalize the distinction. An asshole is an a…
/r/TheRedPill02/09/15 07:49 AM
8

St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica, Question 58, entitled: "Do We Appropriately Define Justice as the Constant and Perpetual Will to Render to Others What Is Due to Them?" St. Thomas replies that "the aforementioned definition of justice is appropriate if we understand it correctly." Red Pill is nothing new. We're relearning what men of old used to understand.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/15 12:35 AM
2

Word. Literally satanism, as is said by a former satanist priest. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6pOJpCmlAI
/r/TheRedPill08/08/15 03:55 AM
1

The laws of man exists in a domain that intersects with and transcends the laws of biology (whatever they may be). The latter is in a domain that intersects with and transcends from the laws of chemistry (whatever they may be), and the latter still is an intersection and transcendence of the laws of physics. Justice is then the word we use for equilibrium of forces, the conservation of energy, the swing of the pendulum, Newton's third law, etc.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/15 05:20 PM
2

Your life is an expression of your genes.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/15 05:10 PM
-4

What makes red-pill so awesome is that it involves transcending predestination imposed on us by genetics.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/15 01:38 PM
1

Depends on how you define "Justice". If Justice does not exist in nature, and is only a social construct, then the Just world hypothesis is a fallacy. If Justice exists in nature, and social constructs are attempts to approximate behaviour to accord with said justice, natural justice so to speak, then the just world hypothesis is a fallacy only if the interpretation of justice is incorrect. Justice seems to exist, given the existence of "the Wall", and the existence of the Manosphere as a correc…
/r/TheRedPill28/07/15 01:35 PM
7

I beg to differ. Grammar is not a law of nature, but a product of human convention. The Germans capitalize their nouns. It is quite the elegant convention; it is charming to see the convention adopted in the English language such as this article.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/15 12:39 AM
2

Brilliant. This elevates self-improvement from its mundaneness if you look at it by means of linearization to a level that not only makes it doable, but even allows for self-mastery. This is a whole 'nother level.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/15 08:06 AM
1

"To make judgements of right and wrong about the underlying structures of reality is a bastardization of science and inquiry; the ultimate blue pill." Wrong. This statement here is upheld by a network of assumptions incapable of standing up to a serious rational inquiry. If you look at the history of the fact-value distinction, it was an assumption that was made by early scientists in order to survive, not because the separation between facts and values were in and of themselves "logical" or "co…
/r/TheRedPill17/01/15 09:09 AM
0

This the most offensive, cynical, misogynistic piece of garbage I have ever read. (See girls I'm on your side, can I get some poosy?)
/r/TheRedPill25/12/14 03:57 AM
1

Wrong. A fallacy is not necessarily an indication of untruth. It may simply be that you have inept users of rhetorical and dialectical argumentation. It takes a good argument to show something is true that is not accepted by many as axiomatic. See the fallacy fallacy. And laws are intended to change human behaviour, even though they do not necessarily change them. Regarding your example, you're assuming that prostitution has never been legal. And if his answer is illogical, but he is either not …
/r/TheRedPill25/12/14 02:20 AM
12

Music actually has a concrete effect on your attitudes, perspectives and behaviour. This is why its not good to spend all day listening to simpy love music. https://blog.bufferapp.com/music-and-the-brain
/r/TheRedPill15/12/14 08:15 PM
1

Your statement doesn't mean what you think it means. You're implying that my statements are not backed up by any evidence. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cycle I suspect that you're not capable of following my train of thought, given that you didn't address a single one of my points, so I will stop here.
/r/TheRedPill12/12/14 04:17 AM
1

I'll restate what I said again, I would have replied sooner, but being in the middle of writing finals and an LSAT makes it hard to find time to check up on this forum. The science is a method and a way of looking at the world. It is an epistemology. It assumes that all physical phenomena are intelligible, and therefore explainable, by means of causal explanation. When scientific consensus is reached, it is basically an agreement that a certain causal explanation has a high probability (less tha…
/r/TheRedPill11/12/14 07:54 AM
1

see sunspot activity, and its relation to climate. Note that there exists scientific consensus about something because it is simply true. No thing is true because there is simply a scientific consensus.
/r/TheRedPill28/11/14 08:46 PM
3

I would suggest reading Thus Spake Zarathustra after you've read his other works, since it is a culmination of them all. Twilight of the Idols. If you want his red pill type work, Beyond Good and Evil.
/r/TheRedPill28/10/14 08:02 PM
1

"beauty is in the eye of the beholder." You're effectively stating that aesthetics is subjective. More specifically, that there exists no objective standard by which to rate an object (ha) or subject, and hence they are unrateable. All is subject to personal preference. But this cannot be so, because we cannot choose who to be attracted to. If a girl is hot she is hot. If she is not hot she is not. There exists some objective standard, and even though it may not be amenable to precise numeration…
/r/TheRedPill28/10/14 02:01 AM
2

What's your question? How much more explicit will this state of debauchery become? It will continue to become increasingly explicit until the state collapses. This type of behaviour only appears on a wide scale in civilizations with abundant resources, and a powerful state that can assure the steady distribution of those resources. I will not mention what this "state" is, but it is not merely the American civilization. I'll give a brief account of what will replace this state. While this questio…
/r/TheRedPill20/10/14 12:35 AM
1

Billy. Because his view of the world is not nihilistic like Barry's, and because he acknowledges that there are things that have intrinsic worth and that do matter.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/14 01:39 AM
1

Straight out of Hegel. Wisdom would therefore qualify as the product of interaction between abstract reason and concrete experience (life experience), with the inner self operating as mediator. Reason, which always appeals to and applies universal principles, and experience, which is always a set of particular instances is mediated and reflected by the inner self. Take note also that reason can never address exact particular instances, for it is outside the capacity of language (the medium of re…
/r/TheRedPill14/10/14 08:24 AM
1

Welcome. I upvoted your original post from zero because it is intriguing. Although I rarely comment here, I have been a long time lurker, and am very familiar with the concepts espoused here. Perhaps even the history and the metaphysics that underly the history that make the existence of this forum logically necessary, as feminism was. We are not ideologues here. We want the truth, in particular the real motivating factors behind common social interactions. If you will reject the common terms "b…
/r/TheRedPill08/10/14 05:12 AM
3

It's pretty cool to think that consciousness has an effect on how genes are expressed. In this respect, the goal of red-pill seems to be ultimately linked to self-mastery -- not merely talk that begins and ends with ideas, but expressions that affect the concrete physical realm of genetics, society, culture, etc.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/14 03:57 AM
5

Beautiful . "The general TRP consensus is that feminism is incoherent - that is it doesn't make sense and isn't consistent as a way of thinking. It's inherently contradictory." In mathematics and logic, a system that is incoherent or inherently contradictory, or both, would immediately be thrown out. It is worthless. What keeps feminism viable is neither its academic insight or its logical coherentness, but the sheer power of force; the force is not physical but psychological. Among the many cla…
/r/TheRedPill01/09/14 02:48 AM
0

Exhibit A: Notice the manner in which the club's spokes(wo)man uses term "reductio ad absurdum" which is a technique of proof commonly used in deductive reasoning, especially logic and mathematics. Example: Suppose we want to show that a car can be driven only if its engine is running. By using reductio ad absurdum, we must deny that a car can only be driven if its engine is running. So we say that its engine is not running. Further suppose that a car can still be driven, despite its engine not …
/r/TheRedPill09/08/14 06:42 AM
1

Skepticism is a natural consequence of Cartesian doubt, which underlies modern cognition. It is in no way a refutation, but deeper. To be skeptical is to say that the any self-consciousness who would seriously harbor such thoughts must be fundamentally in error. Skepticism tells itself that it is animated by the fear of error. Error arises from an unquestioned acceptance of authority. This is the modern ethos. Hence, since no words are sufficiently authoritative in and for themselves, no criteri…
/r/TheRedPill01/04/14 03:42 AM
3

Warning: Heavy Physics and Calculus Concluding statements: "Factor I As in every social system approach, stability is achieved only by understanding and accounting for human nature (action/reaction patterns). A failure to do so can be, and usually is, disastrous. As in other human social schemes, one form or another of intimidation (or incentive) is essential to the success of the draft. Physical principles of action and reaction must be applied to both internal and external subsystems... Factor…
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 01:49 AM
6

It is possible to have the wrong intuition, i.e. the geocentric model. Some truths are true despite our intuition, such as the fact that it is possible to draw an infinite number of lines through a given point above a given line (the basis for hyperbolic geometry; our intuition would say that only one such line exists, by Playfair's Postulate.) Intuitions are learned habits; they are taught to us by the society in which we live. We live in an atomistic society, where the individual is one the on…
/r/TheRedPill15/03/14 03:49 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter