TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

0112358f Archive

View 0 posts and 105 comments by 0112358f on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Please control for sex drive. Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/23 05:57 AM
1

For me no. Dead bedroom marriage. Best sex was at age 20-21.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/23 04:04 AM
1

Do you don't think asexuals are real, or you're one of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 01:30 AM
1

Assuming she'd stay the same long term - skinny with not so good face, easily
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 06:14 PM
1

A. I give the relationship about 3 weeks. You're better off alone than with B.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 06:02 PM
1

Generally male friendships involve shared enjoyment in common hobbies. Absolutely no affection, very little validation. In some ways they offer far more support then most female friends do in others less - male support tends to be very "real" but also expected more in emergencies as opposed to a constant emotional exchange. It's more a "when someone has a serious problem they can't handle everyone pitches in to fix the problem" at which point they can all go back to hanging out and just having f…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/21 03:59 PM
3

I'd say it's end of honeymoon phase (between 12 and 24 months). Couples who've already had kids will attribute problems to the kids and try to wait for things to improve plus are more motivated to try to make it work anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/21 12:44 AM
1

You find constant warfare and bloody revolution and lots of men dying and the survivors reproducing. I think we are hoping to avoid that though.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/21 07:04 PM
2

Realistic standards are ones that you can regularly meet in new partners who are interested in dating you such that you can test for compatibility and how the relationship develops. If you can't get people who meet your standards interested in you, either you or the standards need to change if you don't want to be alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/21 06:57 PM
8

That's not what sex drive is. It's extremely recently in human evolutionary history that we figured out sex lead to pregnancy. It's unlikely any other species knows that it does.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/21 04:09 AM
3

It's a reflection of the individuals in it. It sounds like you enjoy sex but have a much lower drive than average. That's fine. But you're like someone who doesn't like sweet food much asking why cultures are so obsessed with dessert.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/21 01:48 AM
0

I think that both a traditional model and a "fully equal" model can involve both spouses working and contributing fairly in the relationship. I think hybrids are possible but you'd need to be really clear about who does what and what's expected of them because if someone just picks and chooses from each they can end up ... really being a freeloader. I think you might also want to be mindful of someone who's ability to contribute and the way they want to contribute aren't aligned.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/21 01:46 AM
1

It seems very common and frankly I'm not sure how you can know it's coming or not. In any case I'd maybe suggest no long term commitment before a couple years together as it frequently shows up within that time frame.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/21 01:41 AM
15

Like a lot of the complaints men have with dating advice for women, the problem here is attraction vs behaviour in a relationship. She's saying she has relatively low requirements for a guy she's in a relationship with. He's saying women have high standards to be interested in a guy. Both are true.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/21 04:41 PM
1

Agree on both. I'd also note that for most it probably requires building a somewhat fake persona, improving their observations of reactions so they can adjust their "game" and then practice. Some people, maybe most, lack the ability to have more than occasional somewhat lucky success doing this. I've know one or two who consciously became good at it. It tends to result in them having pretty nihilist views about higher aspects of relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/21 03:04 AM
2

I think most believe they can boost their looks somewhat. It's the "breezy masculine intuitive sexy escalation" that I think most either give up on or go deeeep into pua. I'm not sure how else dramatic changes would be made there. It has some ... questionable long term impacts.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/21 02:46 AM
0

You're essentially asking why all "not sexy" guys aren't black pilled.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/21 02:29 AM
0

I suspect low sex drive women file for divorce less.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/21 02:14 AM
2

Second for sure. This sub is full of virgins imagining a great sexlife with a tradwife. I will believe someone's sexually attracted to me when there's evidence if it. Real evidence. Been burned too badly otherwise. They really liked me they just weren't that into sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 03:40 AM
1

Skilled at sex is worth almost nothing Sexually enthusiastic is worth a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 03:03 AM
1

I'm not sure exactly what you're referring to but I suspect it's leaning on the fact that it's easier to get someone new attracted then try to repair attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 02:39 AM
1

From outside it would appear that lower class inner city men actually have it much better with women. This seems ironic given wealth is helpful, the problem most for most middle class guys is they hang around with women who have the same amount of it. Anyway I'd suggest the driving factor here is that for poor urban communities in the US, there's a shortage of men. This is primarily due to the massive incarceration rate in the US.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 02:37 AM
2

I don't think your assertion is accurate. TRP (if you believe it's accurate) is a description the actual system we live in. "The red pill" is seeing this truth versus the blue pill "believing things are as you are told". So trp men may reject certain proscribed behaviours but not because they necessarily think the "traditional" deal on offer isn't fair - rather they don't think the advertised deal is actually available.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 02:33 AM
1

You picked two subs then note there are differences. Obviously pua forums are more of a mirror to Fds than Mgtow is.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 01:15 PM
2

Feeling sexually desired is a prerequisite for feeling romantically loved, for me. So when younger especially I might have delayed sexual expression but believed we were waiting for other reasons. There could be reasonable logistical reasons why we don't have sex. But long term of a partners desire doesn't seem to be there, I don't feel romantically loved, period. As for the other direction, sex can be appealing without any prior love but I have some tendency to get attached from it. But it's no…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/21 03:10 AM
2

I know men with each of the qualities you describe but none who fit this image in your mind. Beyond that I don't think this stereotype you imagine is even a "type" - some of these characteristics are I'd say negatively correlated at least in the west.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 03:13 PM
3

My recommendation to anyone in these scenarios is to stress what you, personally, like and don't enjoy as much. This is not quite the same as being "good" or "bad" in bed. Someone might be objectively "good" in bed but that doesn't make them a mind reader. Treating it as the person doing something wrong immediately introduces shame and defensiveness that just doesn't need to be there. There's a good chance someone else might think what they did is perfect. Just focus on communicating what you li…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 03:08 PM
1

This is a decade old, but was from the okcupid dating set. Note that for the older men and women it's being partly driven by the "total single population" being young. https://miro.medium.com/max/1416/0*q95i3Ma24k-hxBtK.png
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/21 04:57 PM
2

Data I've seen on dating sites suggest there's just a decline from a peak not really a "wall". There are certain spots things move a little bit abruptly. One is around 30 for women, but I don't think it's because men like 28 year old women so much more than 31 year old women. From my own peers, it tended to be that they suspected 30 year old women would want to settle down fast. If the guy was not ready for that (for instance one was just starting an MBA) they were a little wary of dating women …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/21 04:44 PM
3

Some are happy about it many are not. Accepting TRP views doesn't magically make you an alpha chad. Most "Chads" aren't even that aware of "the pill" since they got laid easily from mid high school on. So a few apply pua and so on and actually become successful. Some are happy. Some ... are disappointed still because they've learned to view people as being less than they hoped. A larger group becomes somewhat more successful, but similarly, some of the magic is gone in life. They might improve t…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/21 04:40 PM
1

Men claiming they don't like makeup are the equivalent of women saying they just like nice guys. A quick look at reality shows it's bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 04:51 PM
–

Based on how some people define it, yes a huge number of women are. Many are not. I'd suggest focusing your dating on women who have the sort of sexuality you desire in a partner. If you're looking for more the sort of woman who is turned on easily and often you will HAVE to screen on that.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 04:46 PM
2

Given your premise they don't. I'd suggest that while lots of people get married as a romantic thing, in practice legal marriage only makes sense in then context of raising a family. If you're not going to have children, don't get married. Live together for a while if you want, just date if you want, have casual hookups if you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 11:45 AM
1

I think being ignored is that I'm told a lot of SD are married. So they're paying her to show up on his schedule and accept being ignored when he's busy.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 06:20 PM
1

That's because Uniqlo doesn't fit if you're that tall it's cut shorter. Source : nothing there is long enough for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 06:17 PM
1

Yes. They come in thin and average height, fat and average height and very fat and average height, for the most part.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 06:16 PM
1

If you're close to institutional power, political skills matter more. If you're further from it, physical power matters more.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 06:05 PM
1

Multiple reinforcing trends. Social media Increase of online dating and especially the shift to phone apps from pc websites in late 2000s Women outnumbering men in universities plus big media cities means most influential cultural locations have a shortage of men. Sexual revolution got slowed down by the AIDS scare but eventually people decided they weren't scared. Later marriage. Add it all up and you have a significant shift of women out of the "dating market" and into the hookup market. That …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/21 03:22 AM
1

I don't know but I will point out that one possibility is that older women drop out of the dating market because they lack options. Older employed men can generally find women to date somewhat more easily then they could when young so if they are interested in dating they can easily do so. Some older women also date easily but some definitely do not. The data seems to suggest who is trying to date and doesn't ask why not if the answer is no.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 03:10 AM
1

Men prioritize youthfulness in their partner more. It's nothing to do with how well they show or hide the signs of aging. And it's not that men necessarily look better with age or anything - it's just that women get a huge boost purely for being "young women" and then that boost goes away.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 03:07 AM
74

They're sleeping with the same guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/21 08:51 PM
3

My sense is that men like feminine looking women. Some like tomboys, some like girly girls. They're not all that interested in masculine looking women. Women like very grown up adult and secure men. Some like pretty men and some like more bear like ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/21 01:15 AM
–

This assumes women would prefer a relationship with an average guy over being one or a bunch of women a hotter guy is hooking up with. That assumption may not be accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 07:58 PM
1

I think this has always been true. I also agree with the bulk of what you've written. Im sure there are millions of men and women who go against these roles, but there's a lot of truth in them. While for some people it's about "expecting others to look after them" or "thinking planning is effeminate" I really don't think those are the driving motivators. I think women just enjoy having more stuff related to food in a social way and comfort. Men really value it less. Maybe men value mobility and …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 07:56 PM
1

It will go higher then it did in the past due to porn/video games/internet as pacifiers.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 06:39 PM
1

It's a factor but the other factor is that older men are dead. That's why there are more single older women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/21 12:47 PM
1

Hookup culture ultimately trends to the top group of men being shared by many women. Coupling off to have families pushes monogamy. It's not a matter of cock carousels and hitting a wall. 22 year old women who want children want a partner. 35 year olds who want to party don't need one. The shift towards hooking up creates more men on the sidelines. I suspect that trend will continue. It wouldn't shock me at some point to see a major pushback towards more conservative sexual mores The alternative…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/21 01:45 AM
1

You need to draw a distinction between putting a high priority on finding a good partner versus being obsessed with any specific woman who isn't showing you interest back. Same thing can apply to women really looking for a great partner - nothing wrong with putting high value on finding that guy and making it work, the problem is desperately trying t make it work with guys who aren't putting in the effort back.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/21 12:42 PM
1

If you are dating partners that meet your standards your standards are demonstrably realistic. If you're not you can examine why. If things were puzzling I'd perhaps note that a couple elements in your list are for men negatively correlated (tend not to go together, for women not the case) - doesn't make it impossible but worth noting if you're finding that combo hard to find.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/21 12:36 PM
2

I think if you move slowly on sex you're more at risk of determining there's no sexual chemistry and if you move slowly in other areas you're at risk of discovering there are issues in those areas. I suspect TRP advice is primarily of benefit for guys who aren't that good at telling if a woman is really into him or not, so it's a way of quickly filtering out women who "like" but don't "like like" them. Maybe that's most guys maybe not but it sounds like it's not you.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/21 12:31 PM
1

They have power. Not money but plenty of other types. This is particularly attractive for young women whose similar age peers who are following the rules are many many years away from having any sort of power.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/21 12:10 PM
3

I suspect what you consider a "close friend" is not how male friends treat other men. So any guy trying to be a "close friend" is interested in more than friendship. If you've ever been part of a group of guys who do some activity and invite you along actively, congratulations - you've achieved "male platonic friendship"
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 11:43 AM
1

That's actually not the basis of male friendships. Male friendships are primarily focused on participating together in shared interests. Discussion of each other's feelings is like an emergency only thing. Guys tend to share feelings regularly exclusively in romantic relationships. So the "emotional tampon" thing happens because the girl is treating it like a standard female-female relationship and he's thinking this level of emotional closeness is a step towards being a couple - because it's no…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 11:24 AM
2

If you're in that state pre kids you should definitely get out.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 04:29 AM
1

It's not the physical sex. But you're also completely wrong for how most men's emotions work. And you're wrong in thinking it doesn't have a profound impact on many people's happiness mood and confidence, or that it can just be icing on the cake on relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 12:22 AM
2

The sad denizens of dead bedrooms would hard agree that the relationships are destroyed by this.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 12:20 AM
3

this seems like asking if you'd marry a broke unemployed dropout who was "open to self improvement" Or not. The question in both cases is - are there reasons to think they're on a good path?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 12:13 AM
1

Kids
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 12:10 AM
1

Age is actually going to make it easier. Dating market is massively skewed towards women from say 18-25. More balanced late 20s and in men's favour though mildly after that. What have you done and not done to boost your attractiveness?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/21 10:11 PM
1

Stop hating it. Because based on what you say you should probably look to have some sex before looking for a LTR. By the time you're looking at a LTR you can be honest that you're a late bloomer who really only had casual relationships but want more.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/21 10:07 PM
1

Women who are virgins themselves for religious reasons may like it if they think it's by choice. Women who've had a bunch of sex will likely be worried you will slut shame them or will suck in bed. They dealt with guys figuring out what to do when they were 16 they don't want to relive that sex. So what should this guy do? Well first of all decide what sort of women he wants. If he wants sexually liberal women he should position himself to be attractive to them. Id personally probably try to dro…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/21 10:03 PM
1

Yes. The imbalance pushes dating towards hookups instead of relationships where it shows up because when women can't get a dedicated partner they respond by borrowing another one. Societies with more men then women tend to show more monogamy, as high SMV men lead the charge by locking in commitment. When there's a shortage those men play the field and ironically lower than average men get left behind. As noted, the male female balance is worse for women in areas like inner cities (thanks to pris…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/21 09:56 PM
1

Right but that speaks to marriage being likely expected to last 15 years or so, which would also create big questions about financial scenarios afterward.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/21 09:34 PM
6

I think all of this plus one major additional fact. Plenty of men and women are givers. Plenty are selfish. The selfish men and women are happily taking advantage of the lack of rules. The givers don't move on from selfish people fast enough and then end up places like ... here.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/21 09:32 PM
1

The 80/20 rule (which is a principle not a strict argument about being 75/25 or 85/15) describes the hookup market well. Why? Because high SMV market men opt for variety and easy access over limiting themselves to looksmatches. The "relationship" market is one man one woman so is far more balanced. Yes top men cheat or have serial marriages but that's at the edge. What is happening in countries like the US is that at the lower end of the relationship market women are not marrying at all any more…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/21 09:12 PM
6

I'd say that both men and women have questionable ideas of average but it's complicated because average really really varies by social circle. As a lot of people are noting the average person is probably 40 lbs overweight. Maybe 50. They think they're 15 lbs overweight but they actually don't have remotely the muscle level of the lean fit people the compare themselves too. The thing is there are plenty of circles you can run in where the "average" person eats healthy 80% of the time, drinks slig…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/21 09:08 PM
1

This. Averaging gets rid of all the asymmetries etc and leaves you with well balanced well proportioned features. Most people look worse then that because some elements are a little asymmetrical or unbalanced.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/21 08:59 PM
1

"As a factor he was below average body" He was chosen because he literally had an average body. That before picture is not below average. That's average. That said average in New York isnt average in Arkansas.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/21 08:56 PM
3

Less vanilla more rough to me involves being more emotionally honest with each other, showing more or ourselves parts we may hide usually. Makes me feel closer.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/21 08:52 PM
1

Wealthy people can split up easily. Poor people can also split easily. Everyone in the middle it's a big deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/21 02:18 AM
1

I know a handful of guys who I'd say got divorced raped. None of them married party girls. If anything I'd say their wives tended to be more introverted and quiet and mildly depressive.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 08:41 PM
1

People dance around what they mean here and part of the issue concerns what being "decent" means. I recall a couple weeks ago something came up where one woman was suggesting that situation is so much more important then just if the guy is a chad or not. Basically she had sex fast in scenarios where she was drinking hard at parties or clubs and not otherwise. And that if guys want sex they need to put themselves in those scenarios. So here's a question then: is having sex with drunk girls you ju…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 08:40 PM
2

Question: what if he's terrible at sports?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/21 03:46 PM
1

They were told to leave the class at gun point. Stronger doesn't seem relevant. Perhaps if they'd all rushed him successfully they might have overwhelmed him with some being shot. The same might be true of the women, who knows.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/21 03:41 PM
1

Some of the details of this issue are very jurisdiction dependent. Similarly whether there are actually tax advantages or disadvantages to being married. In most places though you could potentially avoid marriage but if you want a family you're going to be hugely at risk either way. If you don't want kids I would not suggest legal marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/21 03:05 PM
1

A lot of countries if you live as a couple for a while you can legally be considered married
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/21 03:03 PM
4

They'd date casually for sex while raising a family with one partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/21 05:57 AM
1

Somehow didn't see it earlier. I'm not a noodle - i can easily oscillate between skinny fat and lean. Also been training in various ways for a decade or more. Not just bashing my head into a wall trying to add muscle most of that time mind you, mainly shifted to other things where strength/weight ratios were more important. That said, I'll take a look at Marc Fitt - i do read a fair bit and keep an eye out particularly for things regarding people who are bad gainers/bad recovery. Probably worth …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 05:14 PM
6

Breast size and height have petty negligible perceived impact on women's attractiveness. Survey agree survey shows "medium" sized breasts as most popular with roughly equal and substantial numbers of men preferring small and large. Similarly most men's height preference in women seems to be primarily "shorter than me" with men again somewhat divided in preferring shorter versus taller. Weight for men matters, though the argument it matters less than for women is true. Height for men and facial s…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 12:03 PM
2

I think a lot of us know we don't need to get huge but I'd need steroids to hit the "not huge just a bit of muscle" level that the average woman considers optimal. I've got shit muscle building genetics though.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 01:16 AM
1

No way leading actors are only at 34%. Their career depends on it and there's no anti doping agency testing them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 01:14 AM
1

Look how many pro athletes get caught knowing they face testing. Now realize there's no anti doping agency for actors, and question how many are using.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 01:13 AM
3

Steroids and no exercise build muscle at a higher rate than exercise and no PEDs.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 01:08 AM
6

Apparently they're all married to women with no libido. Sometimes seems like the universe just messes with us all.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 10:07 PM
1

I think what you see mirrors your relationship - the high drive partner bends over backwards to accommodate the low drive one. Regardless of who the high drive is.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 06:38 PM
1

Do people really imagine sexually frustrated partners don't try this?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 06:33 PM
1

Most sexless couples I know the high drive partner is fit as hell. It's the first thing they tried to fix the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 06:29 PM
1

Men have a desire to mate with women who aren't pregnant. Women have a desire to mate with men who would produce sexually desire-able offspring.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 06:26 PM
16

There no group for whom owning a sex doll is common. That said to a greater or lesser extent "a wife to do everything to" does not describe how sexual relationships work in either direction in most marriages.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 06:23 PM
1

No, urbanization and birth control do. Children are an asset in a subsistence farming culture and a liability in an urban one. People still want a couple but they get a little less then they aimed for on average.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/21 04:07 PM
1

We can't even get our low standards met, so increasing them seems unlikely.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/21 04:04 PM
1

Sexless marriage for several years crew.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/21 04:02 PM
1

Coercion is creepy, but we actually socialize people to believe sexual compatibility isn't important and that is you're a great partner who is sensitive and caring and connected and helps with chores/wears lingerie and is fit then your partner will magically want lots of sex. The idea that people wants significantly different amounts of sex and being matched is MORE important in a long term relationship isnt out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 07:56 PM
2

Dating is easier for you because you want less out of a relationship. In particular you don't want something where there's a supply demand imbalance. Men with high libidos putting it on the back burner will not get them the relationships they actually want. What they actually need to do is simply move on to high libido women, rather then trying to do some magic rain dance to make a lower libido woman in the mood more often.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 03:59 PM
3

It's partially attractiveness, partly social circle. These things feedback into each other. If you're decent looking, reasonably cool, party, use drugs, hang out with other people doing the same, it's going to be pretty easy. If your social circle doesn't party, you're average looking dude or below average looking girl, and your friends are the same, it's tough. There's a feedback loop on this though: if you are decent looking and popular, you become more confident, more outgoing. You are outgoi…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/21 02:29 PM
3

How much do you find these overlap with frequency of drug use?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/21 01:13 PM
1

Roughly speaking hours worked at home by SAH spouse should be close to work at home + work + commuting by other spouse.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/21 05:20 PM
1

Sort of. The reality is that most of us, really, would like our partners to think we're clever, kind, strong, attractive, impressive, etc. We also simultaneously want them to just 'love us for who we are' but it's not clear what that means. So i think to some extent we like them having standards we meet.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/21 03:49 PM
1

This rings far more true for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/21 03:40 PM
3

I’d say when monogamy is universal everyone ends up with someone in their league. When hooking up is universal a smaller group of men monopolize women because they have multiple partners - they sleep with women below their dating league. Human society as a whole is closer to the monogamous end of the spectrum, but notably less close then it used to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/21 01:07 PM
1

I suspect a lot of men are doing the bare minimum to keep emotional peace, while simultaneously avoiding asking for any emotional support in return.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/20 05:08 AM
1

Spoken to a lot of people in dead bedroom marriages. The high drive partner almost always has jumped through every hoop they can imagine trying to make the low drive happy, less stressed and interested in sex. People should absolutely put effort in to their marriage but the idea that if your spouses libido goes to zero it’s always your fault is cruel and not based on reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/20 12:03 AM
1

No, it’s in line with his other views some of which would be exceptionally triggering for feminists. He’s pretty close to a free speech absolutist. Hates safe spaces, complains about leftists tying to deplatform MRa etc.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 08:27 PM
0

Conor F is not a feminist. Lolz. Guy is an extreme civil libertarian.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 04:19 PM
7

She’s aiming at centrist liberals. She’s written a lot of good stuff on this but it’s not aimed at true believers.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 06:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter