TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

0IIIIII Archive

View 0 posts and 53 comments by 0IIIIII on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Where’s the proof for your claim about Gen Z boys or whatever?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/26 01:10 AM
0

Can you explain in your own words why being racist is wrong, but being sexist is OK?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 02:19 AM
0

Your logic would justify avoiding black people for example, as prejudice, for example.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 01:47 AM
0

What would you say about someone who wanted to avoid some minorities for example?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 01:32 AM
0

So if you don’t have a reason you’re making it up like I could come up with a reason and say that women are dangerous or something, and it would be made up
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 12:15 AM
0

None of that is proof
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 10:40 PM
0

Can you provide a reason why you think men are dangerous? And can you substantiate it without stereotyping?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 09:21 PM
1

Elevated caution without proof is prejudice and hysteria
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 12:48 AM
0

Yes, where’s the proof that women are harmed by men in the U.S.? Dynamics that involve men on men violence do not involve women, there’s no proof that women are in danger.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 12:19 AM
0

There is no proof that men are associated with harm: stronger correlations are something like race or age, or proximity to you. Provide proof.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 11:39 PM
0

Your lived experience does not give you license to judge billions of people.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 11:19 PM
1

You cannot hold views that are illogical and it can’t be logical without proof.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 12:28 PM
1

Anything that is written without proof can be ignored and discarded as it has no evidence
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 11:44 AM
0

Does not give you license to make assumptions about billions of other people
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 10:35 AM
0

You could easily be assuming or extrapolating or just making a big deal out of things that aren’t a big deal or our subjective.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 02:06 AM
0

No proof? How do you know you’re not making it up?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 01:17 AM
0

Proof of repeated negative experiences?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 12:43 AM
0

What lived experience can one possibly have to support the notion against or for an entire gender?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 08:32 PM
0

Hmmm…so your ideas and prejudices are beyond reproach?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 06:40 PM
0

Where is the proof that their lived experience is valid and truthful?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 06:24 PM
1

The reason prejudice is bad, and logically indefensible, and tied into the etymology of the word, is that it’s judging someone based on prior assumptions and not proof.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 06:11 PM
0

No, because without proof, it’s prejudice
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 12:59 PM
0

? Makes no sense. You can’t just go through Life saying things especially about people without evidence. Pretend you’re in high school and I am your teacher if you submit me an essay without proof and it’s just your rambling then you would fail because it can’t be trusted
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 12:07 PM
1

So if we can’t prove what you’re saying is true then why should we believe you?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 11:44 AM
1

So we should just trust you without any hesitation? And we should just trust what you’re feeling?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 11:28 AM
0

It’s not me claiming anything it’s me observing that you do not have proof
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 11:14 AM
0

So basically all these women can be discredited because none of them have proof to back it up. It’s just hysterics?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 03:50 AM
0

If you’re going to claim that women are unsafe or that men are dangerous you should provide proof.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 03:25 AM
1

So basically, you’re confirming that women do not have a proven reason to fear men?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 02:34 AM
0

So how do we know they’re not just overreacting or making it up?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 01:38 AM
0

Is there proof from like a source? Or is there no proof?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 12:32 AM
0

So on what basis do women have to inform these negative views of men?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 12:25 AM
0

So your argument is that… what exactly? Women have good lives in the US or bad lives in the US?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 12:12 AM
0

So basically your argument is if you exclude violent crime, women are in more danger than men?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 11:58 PM
0

The crime rates are relatively low, so what’s the impetus for danger?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 03:34 AM
0

Where is the proof that women are unsafe?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 03:21 AM
0

I’m really trying to demonstrate that your opinion doesn’t really matter because facts don’t support your opinion. Your narrative does not exist outside of your mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 11:55 PM
0

and would you also agree that women are in less danger than men are?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 05:38 PM
0

Yes…but where’s the evidence that shows women are in danger?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 03:02 PM
0

So your argument is women are unsafe, based on some unproven and unquantified statistic you made up, that isn’t about violence or safety, but something else-that also somehow means danger?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 12:11 AM
0

Yes, there’s not. Where’s the proof? Women are largely not affected by violent crime and live safe lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 02:32 PM
0

But the evidence shows that this is not true
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 03:21 AM
0

So what is the reason women are afraid of men?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 01:49 AM
0

OK, but there is really no reason statistically for you to be afraid. Your fear therefore, is not rational. And therefore so is your prejudice
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 01:25 AM
0

But women are victimized less often than men, so the evidence proves that women are safer.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 01:03 AM
0

“Prejudice is not inherently bad”? Also, where is the proof and reasoning that women are in danger? Women are far less likely than men to be victim of violent crimes.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 11:52 PM
1

So then you can be ignored
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 05:30 PM
0

Basically, if you’re not judging people on your anecdote, then what you said doesn’t matter because it doesn’t apply to anyone. It’s not truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 09:50 AM
-2

You can’t just judge half of humanity based on your personal experiences. You can’t just judge billions of people because one person of a certain type may have hurt you.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 02:54 AM
0

You’re just making it up. There’s no proof. Or you’re making assumptions and extrapolating with no proof.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 02:31 AM
3

Is there any proof for what you’re saying?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 09:28 PM
4

Where is the proof that young men do not speak well of women? That tends to only be true online. Online is not representative of reality. It’s representative of what people say online and of what’s in your algorithm. You are making assumptions without proof.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 09:01 PM
3

I’m not sure what the answer “why don’t you like being treated like an object” is. If someone asked me I couldn’t answer them, it’s a simile I don’t know the literal meaning of. Please be nicer and more supportive.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 10:37 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter