TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

0xstev3 Archive

View 2 posts and 167 comments by 0xstev3 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
23

0xstev3/r/MensRights08/12/13 03:46 PM
2

0xstev3/r/MensRights03/11/13 06:03 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I want her to be free to hire whoever the fuck she wants.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 07:02 PM
2

I'm not even sure if feminists say this isn't the case for men too...
/r/MensRights26/01/14 10:52 PM
21

you don't love women, you just want to stare at their fake, photoshopped tits! I'm so insecure! stop objectifying women!
/r/MensRights30/12/13 07:14 PM
0

<3
/r/MensRights29/12/13 11:38 AM
-9

Success at what? Life? I'd definitely say it's more to do with how you feel over what you studied, yeah.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 10:24 PM
-10

He just said he came out emotionally alright No, he didn't? He said he thinks he's alright because he managed to finish a university course.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 09:54 PM
-28

I think I came out alright (About to graduate with a BS in chem from a pretty decent uni). It seems weird that you would base your success as a human on what you studied at a university. Why not how you are emotionally?
/r/MensRights28/12/13 09:10 PM
1

Should Businesses Be Allowed to Discriminate Against Gay People?
/r/MensRights16/12/13 12:54 PM
3

1 was definitely not consensual! If I can't remember giving consent, is it consent? That's a question I'm still working out the answer for, haha. Last weekend my friend was in a similar position except he pissed on someone's car and still doesn't remember doing it... Should he go and wash their car? Probably. It reminds me of some UFC fight where a corner said their fighter was 'fighting on auto pilot' past the 2nd round because he didn't remember anything after it... but all that really means i…
/r/MensRights09/12/13 12:01 AM
1

I don't get it.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 10:06 PM
2

Well I can understand someone saying you're not responsible for what you do when drunk since you can barely think etc, and I can understand why you would say you are in fact responsible since you chose to get drunk, but it seems wacky to hold someone responsible for something they didn't even take themselves.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 09:54 PM
–

Even if the intoxicant was given to you without your knowledge a court is unlikely to look at you favourably. ಠ_ಠ wut If they are drunk but not unconscious it is for the jury to decide whether they were too drunk to consent. That's weird since Intoxication can rarely, if ever, count as a defence.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 09:11 PM
–

That's making a false assumption that someone is being persuaded/encouraged/forced, though. For example, a sober person could be lying in bed and have a drunk person come and imitate the sex.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 04:23 PM
2

I'm not really concerned about laws, just the logic.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 04:13 PM
1

We're not talking about the law, though.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 01:01 AM
2

But nobody cares about "racist" are you replying to the wrong chain of comments?
/r/MensRights06/12/13 12:47 AM
1

It is racist because it is discriminating against someone purely based on their skin colour. Discriminating on race is not inherently racist. Check the definition of racist I gave. I'm unsure of the relevance of the rest of your comment. Sure it might not be the best business move, but that's hardly the point lol
/r/MensRights05/12/13 11:07 PM
3

Thus, creating at atmosphere where it is superior to be "white male" rather than "black male" is racist. No it's not because it's completely void of the only thing requiring of a racist: a belief that one race is superior to another.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 10:54 PM
0

Both clubs are offering cheap tickets to people they want there in order to make themselves more cash. It seems like a fine comparison. I'm not sure why a cheap ticket can only go to a group of people who the other customers will want to fuck.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 08:23 PM
9

Why dumb? racist ˈreɪsɪst/Submit noun a person who believes that a particular race is superior to another. Doesn't seem to fit.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 08:13 PM
2

Because there is probably not a large portion of blacks in that club who want more whites there to have sex with. Let's assume they're there for the hiphop.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 08:03 PM
18

See how dumb that sounds? No? Say I have a hip hop bar or something which is in a mixed town. I want to increase my clientèle by appealing to the currently uninterested white guys, so I say "white guys get in for $5 and get a free beer". Would that be dumb to you?
/r/MensRights05/12/13 07:50 PM
0

it is lol
/r/MensRights03/12/13 01:26 PM
1

You think my opinion changes if the genders are switched or something?
/r/MensRights03/12/13 01:14 PM
-3

Don't work for her if you don't like how she treats you... Waaaaaaaa, moooooom state! She called me a bad word!!
/r/MensRights03/12/13 12:36 PM
25

You didn't actually correct him - You just said it's her right to dye her hair, which nobody even suggested it wasn't. ... was that a parody?
/r/MensRights30/11/13 05:54 PM
-2

If a woman abuses a man he is seen as weak. An abused woman is seen as victimized. Well yeah, because men are in almost all cases more capable of defending themselves, no? Is that not why that is? Telling someone to leave a relationship where their partner lashes out is excellent advice.
/r/MensRights28/11/13 09:07 AM
1

This, and the action doesn't matter because you're either responsible for your actions or you aren't? What your actions are shouldn't even come into the equation...
/r/MensRights25/11/13 03:11 PM
3

The second you put something on the internet it is not yours anymore. Unless you're in favour of intellectual property, in which case it can be.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 09:03 PM
4

it's always nice to see a fair, nonbiased news source
/r/MensRights15/11/13 03:52 PM
3

I'm not sure why MRAs are being painted as people who are trying to get close to women while not taking no for an answer lol
/r/MensRights03/11/13 06:03 PM
1

Because I imagine being held down for a long period of time and effectively being tortured has a greater impact than getting kicked unconscious.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 08:53 AM
1

We're talking about rape, not sexual assault, so I'm not sure how your comment contributes.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 08:37 AM
-12

And the other typically has a far greater effect on a person's physical health. For me, mental health is far greater of a concern. She could've killed the guy, or at least caused some serious brain damage. This is often the case with rape, too. There's also the risk of potentially life-ending STDs.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 09:36 PM
-2

Well, there's varying degrees of both attacks...
/r/MensRights07/10/13 08:43 PM
-8

Nope.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 06:12 PM
-12

Being raped.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 05:53 PM
-24

One typically has a far greater effect on a person's mental health, I think.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 04:50 PM
1

I have no idea what you are trying to say. I was responding to your criticism of the image, which I believe to be silly/false. I still don't see a problem with the image, no matter how you change it - Certainly not to the point where it's offensive, anyway.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 10:06 PM
1

The sprint she makes while young does not count because this is supposedly a marathon. Yeah, that's good advice? People typically get lazy and take the piss, if allowed to. I can imagine it leading to shitty outcomes for both parties if you're not always trying to make life good the other. If after 240 months, her evaluation doesn't abide by the man's standards, then she can be fired. Opposed to her not allowing you to fire her? Thinking you have to keep them around because of what they did 240 …
/r/MensRights19/09/13 09:53 PM
1

If she doesn't measure up to what she was twenty years ago, dump her. That's not really what it's saying... Do you have some insecurity around the matter? I don't understand why you're seemingly insisting on taking offence. What's the problem with evaluating your relationship with a person?
/r/MensRights19/09/13 06:19 PM
1

So you're not going to point out the problem to me?
/r/MensRights19/09/13 09:44 AM
1

So you're not going to point out the problem to me?
/r/MensRights19/09/13 08:44 AM
1

Or good business practice.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 08:32 AM
2

I flipped it and saw nothing wrong with it either.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 10:25 PM
2

I don't see the problem with it even when flipped. Could someone point it out to me?
/r/MensRights18/09/13 07:41 PM
5

What happens if you keep people around for utility?
/r/MensRights18/09/13 07:20 PM
2

It seems they were both happy with what happened, right? Is a 14 year old not responsible for their actions? Obviously not legally, but I'm not concerned with discussing arbitrary laws.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 11:11 AM
1

What happens to the peaceful people who do not follow your law?
/r/MensRights08/09/13 02:12 PM
1

Banning an unethical practice is not violence. Are you saying you were correct here? It's pretty obvious that your claim is false, no?
/r/MensRights08/09/13 02:02 PM
1

To sum up what's happened: You said something incorrect, I corrected it, now u mad.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 01:51 PM
1

All free society questions will be answered in r/anarcho_capitalism
/r/MensRights08/09/13 12:22 PM
1

If I agree to build you a wall for $10 and you pay me upfront, and then I don't pay you, then I would say it would be legitimate for you to dive on me and take your $10 back. I would say this is legitimate violence because the other person stole $10 from you. If you dive on a stranger and he beats you up, I would say that is legitimate violence because it's self defence. If you walk up to me and say "yo brah im the govt, give me your money so I can enforce this law, or I'll put you in a cage" I …
/r/MensRights08/09/13 12:11 PM
-3

It was awful but what could I possibly have done? Turned to them and said "stop pinching my arse"?
/r/MensRights08/09/13 11:35 AM
1

You have a broad-ass definition of violence. What is violence? I use the dictionary definition. vi·o·lence /ˈvī(ə)ləns/ Noun Behavior involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something. Is revoking a license violence? Is a fine violence? If you agreed to be fined should you not provide a service or something, via a contract, then that is violence still, but you've agreed to pay it. I would say that is a just use of violence, along with defending yourself from the ini…
/r/MensRights08/09/13 09:59 AM
2

And what about in places where people would? hm? would what? Banning an unethical practice is not violence. You would need to uphold your law, and that requires threats of violence both towards the people breaking it and towards the people you are going to force to fund it.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 09:44 AM
2

If you dislike it, do not shop there. I wouldn't, and I would encourage you not to. non-violent means to ends <3
/r/MensRights08/09/13 09:01 AM
1

The willingness in what? Regularly donating money = lots of voluntary sex This part is the willingness part...
/r/MensRights28/08/13 08:16 AM
0

Well the lack of age is the problem with the stats, you're saying I have a problem with the stats because I think the numbers are wrong or something, which is false...
/r/MensRights19/08/13 07:23 AM
1

From your refusal it seems you don't even know what you're arguing against - How surprising. Peace out, you angry little man :)
/r/MensRights18/08/13 10:49 PM
1

Regardless, you still have no actual argument in defense or your position, I'd love for you to actually tell me what you think my position is.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 10:39 PM
-1

Your claim is that cops don't put their safety first. You said they don't because of some oath they swear, which doesn't mean they don't put their safety first, only that they say they wont. The police swear an oath to put themselves right in the path between you and anything that might want to hurt you. This doesn't even contradict my claim either... My point was that they wouldn't put themselves in added danger if they didn't need to, and you come at me with this 'cops will take a bullet for y…
/r/MensRights18/08/13 10:12 PM
0

But again, why should you let trivial things like facts facts being your belief that cops are selfless human beings?
/r/MensRights18/08/13 09:03 PM
-1

I'm not complaining about the stats, just the MRA take on them.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 08:43 PM
-1

Cops aren't there to protect themselves. They obviously put their safety first, though. they are forced to view all males as abusers and all females as victims. Why do they say this is?
/r/MensRights18/08/13 08:33 PM
0

I'm not saying the cops deal with situations perfectly, I just don't think cops deal with the bigger threat to them first is because of feminist theory.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 08:18 PM
1

woah life story
/r/MensRights18/08/13 07:32 PM
1

If you really think that then why the fuck are you replying to me?
/r/MensRights18/08/13 07:07 PM
2

Care to tell me exactly what your point is, since my replies aren't doing it for you?
/r/MensRights18/08/13 06:53 PM
1

No, he isn't. Which I explained why not. Saying it over again does not make your position any better. Both could have weapons, only one is able to physically be a threat. Therefore, they're not equally threatening. Which does not alter my point. Well it does, since they're not just targeting random people... It's a dispute between a couple.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 06:44 PM
1

You're a feminist. You're a feminist. So to conclude: zero evidence or even arguments to back up your claims...
/r/MensRights18/08/13 05:28 PM
0

Female on male rape is not rare at all. Please show me some statistics to prove your point, and remember we're talking about cases where the victim is a grown man.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 04:57 PM
0

You just said that its "rare for a woman to overpower a man" showing that you know nothing about the dynamics of female-on-male rape I'm talking about what the average person who hasn't thought about it thinks. perpetuating the idea that women don't rape men I just said it's rare, so that's totally false, isn't it? and toeing the feminist party line on sexual assault. What? You're a feminist failure trying to deny it so you can gain some credibility. Pathetic. I'm not a feminist, and you have ab…
/r/MensRights18/08/13 04:44 PM
-1

I'm not a feminist, nor am I 'rape apologising', nor am I denying that women rape men. Fail...
/r/MensRights18/08/13 04:33 PM
-1

...It's not a comic? Well it's not genuine advice, it's meant to be funny. I'm of the position that a man can talk to (and help) a woman he finds attractive not only because it's the right thing to do but also with hopes in reserve that he may find they're compatible and will develop a connection leading to a fulfilling long term relationship. Sure, but you're only there because of her physical attributes, which of course can come across as pretty lame if it's not likely that the attraction will…
/r/MensRights18/08/13 03:04 PM
0

Well, you're either saying that all any man ever wants, in this given scenario, is to have sex. You seem to have forgotten what the comic is about.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 02:47 PM
-1

Feel free to point out where I'm going wrong.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 02:32 PM
-2

You think finding someone attractive means I only like, and will ever only like, one thing about them. I don't expect you're looking for a long-term relationship, just a wet-hole to put your dick into.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 02:18 PM
-1

I share at least one common interest with almost everyone. I like a lot of things. Irrelevant if you're only stopping because you like the shape of her ass.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 01:07 PM
0

I'm still curious why stopping to help someone wearing a t-shirt from a band you like is fine. It would be more pleasant, since you share a common interest, which likely isn't the case here. I don't mean to put words in your mouth yes you do.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 12:46 PM
1

prostitutes etc
/r/MensRights18/08/13 09:48 AM
-5

sigh, no... We're talking about men, not boys, so we should distinguish between the two. And that's not even my main problem with the statistics...
/r/MensRights18/08/13 08:58 AM
0

I'd be a helpless victim in waiting. You're not stranded, no. But you typically want to wait with your car.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 08:31 AM
-3

Then it's totally irrelevant because drunkness doesn't even come into what we're talking about...
/r/MensRights18/08/13 08:20 AM
-1

Needing help doesn't necessitate vulnerability. They're vulnerable because they're alone and stuck at the side of the road. Having a broken down car doesn't mean someone can't leave. Kinda does. Being attracted to someone doesn't mean using leverage or intimidation to get what you want. I never suggested that's what being attracted to someone entailed.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 01:26 AM
-4

Could you quote the part you mean? I didn't find an answer.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 01:08 AM
-2

they dont mention age. we're talking about men, not boys
/r/MensRights18/08/13 12:57 AM
-4

Also your burglar analogy is false as the same situations are not identical. Doesn't matter. The bigger man is more able of being a threat, so he is more likely to be kept under control first. They do not go after someone just because they make a base assumption based on his body that he's a threat. They need a reason to do so. They've been called to the house.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 12:46 AM
–

I already brought up my concerns with that statistic. There doesn't seem to be a focus on age, and "a near 50/50 split" - well, there's no mention of the other category of male rapes, and the claim that 79.2% of the "rapes" towards men were women is weird since presumably they're not just going on the "made to penetrate" category.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 12:31 AM
–

Can you provide me with the statistics for women raping vs men raping to actually show how I'm wrong?
/r/MensRights18/08/13 12:08 AM
1

This isn't an argument that cops should ignore evidence ;/ It's about them taking rape accusations seriously and not dismissing them because they believe you to be a whore.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 11:58 PM
–

That supports their point, if anything...
/r/MensRights17/08/13 11:47 PM
-9

That's why police officers gather evidence and ask questions Or they can choose to make sure the suspected threat isn't going to be a threat any longer. i.e. 400lb burglar with a 150lb burglar... detain the guy who's more likely to run away. Also keep in mind I'm arguing against the claim that cops have read feminist theory and putting it to the test when in fact they're just assuming who is the bigger threat. Whether theyre doing rightly or wrongly is totally irrelevant to the conversation.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 11:36 PM
-5

Finding someone attractive and wanting to spend time with them to get to know more about them in hopes of building a connection is literally the cornerstone of sexuality. Finding someone who is in a vulnerable place, who needs help and who cannot get leave isn't the same as approaching someone in a bar where you think they might want such attention. If a person wanted to make friends and stopped to help someone because they were wearing a t-shirt from a band their liked, would that warrant the s…
/r/MensRights17/08/13 11:26 PM
-1

Both perpetuate the common stereotype that all women are incapable of working with or on cars. no it doesn't lol is also perpetuating the stereotype that women are manipulative, self-serving its a joke, not advice who would rather trick someone else into fixing something by hiking their skirt up, that wasnt even part of the joke It's also offensive it's a joke LOL get over yourself?
/r/MensRights17/08/13 10:47 PM
-7

I'm saying it's a logical choice to choose to protect the more vulnerable first.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 10:34 PM
-5

Seriously though, when did doing something for someone, even with the desire to build a connection, become a terrible thing? They're a complete stranger, who you want to "build a connection with" (fuck), purely because you're sexually attracted to how they look... Why is it so weird to you that it might not be well received?
/r/MensRights17/08/13 10:22 PM
-3

Or, they're doing them a favour by giving them mechanical advice, while also being flirtatious. They can flirt with people any time, they believe they'll get further if they do something for them, which can come across as rather insulting and belittling. They're suggesting that it's both funny and justifiable to manipulate a mythical system of oppression to their whims, by taking advantage of other people's kindness and/or sexual attraction to them. I would disagree since it's not meant to be ta…
/r/MensRights17/08/13 10:04 PM
-5

They're going to hit on someone when they're vulnerable, needing help, and who cannot leave. Also let's not take the comic too literally, they're poking fun at these men, not actually suggesting you push your car onto the side of the road to get mechanical advice.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 09:54 PM
–

Well your feelings are unprecedented. I haven't mentioned my feelings. A cop would NEVER do this. He would NEVER say this to an alleged victim of a mugging, nor an alleged victim of rape. A cop has never said this to a prostitute that claimed she had been raped? Obviously a conversation wouldn't go down exactly like that, that's more for comic effect.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 09:45 PM
-7

What's the point of your question?
/r/MensRights17/08/13 09:42 PM
0

Your inability to provide a meaningful reply You can't provide a meaningful reply to a boring irrelevant criticism, so instead of trying, I pointed it out.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 09:36 PM
9

(LOL that chick is ugly LOL). She is, though. How is making jokes about an ugly rapist finding a rape hilarious?
/r/MensRights17/08/13 09:35 PM
–

It specifically only teaches a male aggressor, female victim model. Correlation doesn't mean causation. Having no other data than their weight and height, who would you look to protect first?
/r/MensRights17/08/13 09:32 PM
0

Actually there were only five comments talking about feels. Oh look, more irrelevant critiques. Then you started sidetracking and devolving intellectually. You started talking about feels... There was no meaningful discussion after that, you deviated from the actual discussion.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 08:57 PM
-4

Yes. What did I miss?
/r/MensRights17/08/13 08:53 PM
–

And cops are up on feminist viewpoints?
/r/MensRights17/08/13 08:52 PM
0

We're about 10 comments in to you talking about feels... I say that it's irrelevant
/r/MensRights17/08/13 08:41 PM
-1

your ability to point out boring irrelevant shit and turn it into a critique astounds
/r/MensRights17/08/13 08:31 PM
-1

Those terms are not equivalent. Use the words that you actually mean. hurr beliefs are irrelevant when trying to obtain fact hurr what you think is irrelevant when trying to obtain fact
/r/MensRights17/08/13 08:28 PM
–

Getting mugged and handing out your wallet isn't after-donation regret. Getting raped isn't after-sex regret. etc
/r/MensRights17/08/13 08:18 PM
–

At which point you say that the post is about how one feels. No, I said that's how the comic-creator feels about how slutty rape victims are treated. It's not specifically about feels... Replace it with thinks/believes etc.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 08:17 PM
–

There doesn't seem to be a focus on age, and "a near 50/50 split" - well, there's no mention of the other category of male rapes, and the claim that 79.2% of the "rapes" towards men were women is weird since presumably they're not just going on the "made to penetrate" category.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 08:14 PM
–

I wasn't saying it's impossible, only far more rare.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 07:59 PM
–

"Feel" is irrelevant when trying to obtain facts. Never said it was relevant to obtain facts... Speaking of strawmen?
/r/MensRights17/08/13 07:54 PM
32

"Everyone thinks this is hilarious." Sorry?
/r/MensRights17/08/13 07:36 PM
-8

You were blaming the victim and making it sound less serious than it is. Quote me please? Well, if we are going to let our lives and beliefs be decided by what most people think and do... My comment was responding to a guy talking about most people.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 07:29 PM
–

I don't think that feminism is the only one to blame for male rape victims being invisible Do you have an statistics on how many cases of rape are women->man? I feel this is probably why it's "invisible". rape apologists. Like you did now. How exactly am I being a rape apologist? Your answer simplified rape As most people do, and since we're talking about most people...
/r/MensRights17/08/13 07:18 PM
–

That doesn't correct me. The closest it came to was: Men are sometimes sexually assaulted by women but most often they are assaulted by other men. Do you understand what I was replying to? He's talking about the reaction a man gets when they report their rape by a woman, and the reason why.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 07:13 PM
-18

Well it depends on why they're stopping; it might not be out of generosity, but out of sexual interest.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 07:10 PM
–

Already read the thread. Do you understand what I'm replying to? You know what men face every single day when they report women raping them? He blames people's response on... feminism...
/r/MensRights17/08/13 07:02 PM
–

Feel free to correct me.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 06:58 PM
1

Wouldn't feminists like to see such an analysis? AFAIK the patriarchy would be responsible for such expectations for men too, it's just that feminism focuses on hoes, not bros.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 06:57 PM
–

Basically the only thing that this post points out is that we use some level of scrutiny when studying rape cases. And when compared with another case, it's seen as "outrageous" which is the point they're trying to make. This post basically described an outrageous, infuriating situation, and then at the very very very end it says "wait no this is actually about rape." Yes, that's the idea. A type of "this is how we feel" statement.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 06:51 PM
–

I totally see how donating money and cooporating with a mugger are the same thing as rape. Regularly donating money = lots of voluntary sex Cooperating with a mugger = Cooperating with a rapist
/r/MensRights17/08/13 06:48 PM
–

Fucking dipshit feminists are the reason why. Well, no? It's pretty rare for women to rape grown men who can overpower them, which is probably why you get a funny look.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 06:44 PM
7

Just because boys get screwed by these insane laws is no reason to want the same to happen to this girl. He says: I disagree. Bad, unjust laws get changed faster when the beautiful people get ground up in the gears like the rest of us as opposed to making special exceptions for them. Your end-goals are the same, he just wants to achieve them a different way because he believes it's the quicker route.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 01:43 PM
1

All the things.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 01:39 PM
5

the Co-op can stop selling it since they want more customers to come into their store without "viewing porn". I'm not sure of your point. This is how I'd like change to occur, through peaceful boycotting or petitioning of some kind.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 12:00 PM
6

Don't you mean "we don't have time for this pedantic BS"?
/r/MensRights16/08/13 11:35 AM
1

You're being exploited by the evil capitalists!
/r/MensRights16/08/13 11:24 AM
5

Because it's porn "Printed or visual material containing the explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity." why are we selling porn in supermarkets? I don't sell anything in supermarkets. Why are you selling porn in supermarkets? Why is porn visible to children Why are you taking/allowing your children into a shop that sells porn if you don't want them to see it? Why should people have to look at porn as they shop? They can shop elsewhere, no? What "feminist legislation that cens…
/r/MensRights16/08/13 11:22 AM
7

So fine, put bags over women's mags too. Why do you want to put bags over things? Like what? What?
/r/MensRights16/08/13 10:49 AM
8

Um, it's not the state doing it, it's the Co-op. "This mirrors other surveys which confirm that the vast majority of women support feminist legislation that censors or criminalises male sexuality." And perhaps I should rephrase. I don't see how men not having access to softcore pornography in supermarkets matters. At all. It's not a big deal. Who cares. Look up the blog posts on women's mags vs lad's mags.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 10:43 AM
12

I don't see how not having access to softcore pornography in supermarkets is "censoring male sexuality". Supermarkets want to sell a product to men, who want to buy it because of their "sexuality". They're being told they're not allowed to by the state, therefore male sexuality is being censored, no?
/r/MensRights16/08/13 10:27 AM
-2

Let's not force things upon people against their will, kay?
/r/MensRights16/08/13 10:21 AM
3

That does seem to be the theme here... x is unfair and hurts men! ... Let's make it hurt women too! YOU'RE GOING THE WRONG WAY!
/r/MensRights13/08/13 07:48 PM
10

I feel like I'm reading the onion...
/r/MensRights10/08/13 10:24 AM
5

aha?
/r/MensRights03/08/13 04:08 PM
9

If the only doctor in a small town refuses to serve black people, that is unquestionably harmful. A doctor that serves everyone but black people is being helpful to all that he serves; NOT being harmful to those he doesn't. By that reckoning, having no doctor is causing harm to the town or a doctor that doesn't accept animals is somehow hurting the animals... Also, it would leave huge room for competition since all the non-racist and black people wouldn't use his service. To conclude: A person w…
/r/MensRights03/08/13 02:46 PM
4

If you do, then you are the one doing them harm (i.e. through racism, sexism, etc.). You mean harm to their feels? What other harm am I causing a female by not allowing her into my all-guy poker club? I would be acting peacefully by not associating with people I don't wish to, where as you are for forcefully making a peaceful person associate with someone through violent threats... Yet your story is that you're concerned about people doing "harm"? There are also separate rules for what you can d…
/r/MensRights03/08/13 07:30 AM
1

okay cool, we agree.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 07:09 AM
1

As long as the public is the customer, your business is public. What does that even mean? Do I own my business or not? I can't refuse to associate with someone because my business is "public"? Sorry? Because if you start masturbating a complete stranger on a train, people tend to get upset. So I can masturbate a stranger in my house? I'm not even sure what your point is any more...
/r/MensRights02/08/13 10:33 PM
1

A business is public. The public owns my business? You have rights with your own body and home that you do not have in public. Why's that?
/r/MensRights02/08/13 10:15 PM
1

Are you initiating force when you reject someone's attempt to enter your body? Are you initiating force when you reject someone's attempt to enter your house? Are you initiating force when you reject someone's attempt to enter your business?
/r/MensRights02/08/13 10:05 PM
1

yeah, but in self-defense, not the initiation of force.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 09:20 PM
1

Without pointing out how stupid something is how can you hope to fix it? I am pointing out how stupid it is. The opposition wants exactly what they're fighting against, accept towards the people who initiated this nonsense...
/r/MensRights02/08/13 04:45 PM
1

So don't fucking do what you're protesting against? I want consistency too, but you're going the wrong damn way...
/r/MensRights02/08/13 04:27 PM
3

Say I ran an all-male poker club; you're saying you would be happy with having me threatened with violence in order to force me to allow women to join too? Unethical to peacefully avoid associating with a group of people, but not to threaten to violently attack peaceful people if they don't do what you say? haha.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 04:07 PM
2

I'd rather fight for the equal application of these principles. You want to use violence against peaceful people in order to tell them who they must associate with? Why can't you just leave peaceful people alone?
/r/MensRights02/08/13 03:55 PM
-6

Of course. Don't you want people to be free to associate with whomever they wish? I of course would avoid these places but I'm not about to start threatening them, or having the state do it on my behalf...
/r/MensRights02/08/13 03:16 PM
0

And it is discrimination on the basis of sex which should be illegal since it's illegal in every other instance. You don't think people should be free to charge what they like to people wanting to come into their club? Why do you think you have a right to say what they can charge, but not them?
/r/MensRights02/08/13 03:02 PM
0

Good. A club should be free to charge whatever they want...
/r/MensRights02/08/13 02:59 PM
2

Haha, I watched this before and remembered how I thought she was definitely a tumblr-esque feminist the first time I saw her. My femdar is strong.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 02:39 PM
3

I don't see why the guy/partner would get a say in whether she aborts her baby or not... The partner should of course not have to pay for it unless they otherwise agreed to.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 02:36 PM
1

Could you say how it applies to my argument? I'm saying they're making a faulty comparison because they do the "MOST MEN AREN'T RAPISTS" thing, when regardless of whether most men do it or not, it's (nearly) only men who do it. The "dont be that girl" posters were accurate, but when you mix in the "dont be that black guy" it doesn't work because not only black folk steal bikes.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 09:37 AM
1

Could you explain further please?
/r/MensRights14/07/13 10:02 PM
1

Well that's my point...
/r/MensRights14/07/13 10:01 PM
1

I don't understand your reply.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 09:58 PM
0

MOST MEN AREN’T RAPISTS MOST BLACK MEN AREN’T THIEVES Most rapes are committed by men, right? Most bike thefts aren't committed by black men, right? This is a faulty comparison, no?
/r/MensRights14/07/13 11:43 AM
2

or (C) know more about it.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 10:08 PM
0

hahaha
/r/MensRights13/06/13 10:31 PM
-1

I just don't think that every case should be treated the same way. Sometimes it's really creepy, but sometimes I think it's absolutely fine. Perhaps if there weren't an age, or a low one, people would be for educating kids instead of hoping the law will stop predators.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 09:58 PM
3

So, you're very emotional then? Go... etc
/r/MensRights13/06/13 09:56 PM
0

I'm not talking legally, but it's pretty obvious that you can consent to things before whatever arbitrary age the state decides to set.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 09:50 PM
4

No, that's a morality thing. The legality of it is just a reflection of that. Disagree. Unless you're claiming that minors can consent to sex with adults? Legally, no, but otherwise yes of course they can?
/r/MensRights13/06/13 09:48 PM
4

Minors cannot consent to sex. The state says* (nopedo)
/r/MensRights13/06/13 09:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter