TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

10yrs_to_the_day Archive

View 0 posts and 24 comments by 10yrs_to_the_day on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I taught my roommate how to make dumplings this week. They are so much work, but oh so tasty :) I am not Chinese, but I really love making Chinese food. Your dumpling looks great!
/r/RedPillWomen07/04/14 08:54 PM
1

You have a point. But I think there is definitely a difference in the attraction we feel toward figures in media and the attraction we feel toward the opposite sex in real life and relationships.
/r/RedPillWomen22/03/14 09:55 AM
1

My boyfriend just linked me to this yesterday! It was a good way to put things in perspective. Good idea to repost :)
/r/RedPillWomen05/02/14 06:47 PM
1

No she's worried if you develop strong emotions for another woman that your attention and resources will no longer be monopolised by her, but split between her and another woman or women. Women want to monopolise your sexual options and your financial resources so that they remain solely with her. (Guy on girls account) For some guys that's really not an issue. Many alphas are not emotional and can easily have sex without getting attached. We look at it as pure stimulation. It makes me feel more…
/r/RedPillWomen08/11/13 08:46 AM
4

Please be aware that, if you are an American, you may not always be able to exercise this once sacred right. Some court cases have been hacking away at that right. Australia is enacting similar laws.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 12:22 AM
2

HEY! As a woman, I don't appreciate you using terminology charged with sexually-violent imagery!
/r/MensRights16/03/13 01:35 AM
2

I'm sure it sucks in some cases, but, yes, I do believe it's more correct to put such burdens on the individual involved. If you don't think it's fair to force an individual to pay up, how can you think it's fair to force a bunch of people who aren't directly involved to pay up? But this is more of a disagreement over the individual and society than men's rights in particular, so I'll just leave it at that.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 05:07 PM
3

I see where you're coming from, in light of some of the ridiculous settlements given to former spouses. However, I tend to be against making the state responsible for the actions of individuals. I personally think it would be more fair to and sustainable to redistribute funds from the person who was formerly legally and financially bound to the divorce(e), than to expand the welfare state. That could definitely still be done in the controlled manner you have in mind by following individualized c…
/r/MensRights06/03/13 02:19 PM
21

Upvote for providing a real answer, instead of reactionary bullshit. Alimony was certainly warranted back in the day. And, though I'm sure the laws could use a lot of revision, a form of alimony might not be a bad idea today. There are still spouses (male and female) who do not work outside the home and would be destitute if not given some severance money after a divorce. We should never, as a state, force people to stay in a partnership they don't desire because they fear homelessness.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 07:40 AM
2

That's why we have women here, who support us disinterestedly (this can't be said about white knights supporting feminists). What do you mean by that?
/r/MensRights10/02/13 02:38 PM
19

Would this behavior be tolerated if the genders were reversed? Yes, it probably would. It would be tolerated by the males who participate in making lewd comments, even if it wouldn't be tolerated by many females. Most of the comments were women trying to assure everyone that they have it much worse in these situations, but it was good to see something like this get so much attention.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 02:41 AM
2

I think OP meant that it was one point on a list or something that was supposed to give examples of signs of an abusive relationship. In this case, the abuse would be manifested in the form of possessiveness.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 03:15 AM
0

Sucking is for women. Man up, bruh!
/r/MensRights12/12/12 02:45 PM
1

I agree. And for this reason I found the last paragraph to be slightly weaker in form than the previous ones. Instead of pointing out that the main issue is not a vendetta against women and then continuing to leave gender out of it, the replier takes a stab at the feminists' nerves. I think pointing out the more pressing underlying issue and leaving at that would be have been a neater argument. Both OP's and your comments have given me some food for thought on the naivete of approaching such an …
/r/MensRights07/12/12 04:22 AM
3

physical = biological
/r/MensRights27/11/12 03:51 AM
0

It would have been better if the author cited what he was talking about. I'm not sure the exact things he is referencing, but here is what I thought of when I read it: Eugenics - There are some feminist writers who claim that the Y chromosome is defunct and unnecessary to our continued evolution and thus should be stamped out. Mass murder - Probably the continued requirement that men, but not women, be part of the military or other potentially lethal occupations. Elitist legislation - Stuff like…
/r/MensRights07/11/12 06:37 PM
2

Terrible things already do happen to brides in India on an alarmingly regular basis. I'm sure you've heard about the acid burnings. Such actions are abominable and neither sex deserves them! While groom-kidnappings might be comparatively under-reported, that's no reason to say that similarly cruel acts should happen to women.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 01:16 PM
5

You are absolutely correct to point out that this issue, like the issue of salary gap and all other disparities linked to race/gender/class, is multifaceted and cannot be boiled down to the end result. I commend the time you spent to explore this issue in a thoughtful manner, instead of a knee-jerk "Ha! Feminism is wrong!" reaction.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 12:46 PM
2

For some states the age of consent is 16, so it may be the case that the boy was above the age of consent while the girl was not.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 12:30 PM
11

Just because some feminists support something doesn't mean that it is automatically bad. This is concrete proof of a government's dedication to establish equality among its citizens. That is a win for everyone.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 05:29 PM
2

It looks more like this is a typical government ploy to enforce its moral ideals by getting people rally around false facts. This has nothing to do with demonizing men and damselizing women, especially since women (as the majority of sex workers) suffer the most from efforts to repress prostitution.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 11:04 PM
2

You probably mean 40/60, but I commend you for breaking down gender stereotypes about math abilities :)
/r/MensRights15/09/12 05:53 PM
1

Yes. Even if married men and women might have different reasons to have an affair or go about it differently that doesn't have ANYTHING to do with Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 03:14 PM
6

"It's almost as if people think they're anonymous with the Internet, but it's actually the reverse." So, anonymous thinks its people?
/r/MensRights05/08/12 04:18 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter