TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

12358 Archive

View 1 post and 65 comments by 12358 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Bug found: 87 is 870% of 10. 12 is 120% of 10. 12 is 20% more than 10. 12 is not 120% more than 10. It follows that: * 87 is 870% of 10 * 87 is 770% more than 10.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 01:30 PM
2

One way to reduce wars is to pass an equal rights amendment and see how politically palatable it is to draft women alongside men, then send them to the frontlines.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 10:26 AM
2

This should be in the FAQ wiki.
/r/MensRights19/12/21 11:04 AM
2

There's an Israeli rule?
/r/MensRights26/11/21 02:38 AM
6

There are a few cases where it is used to address a medical issue, but there is no medical need to perform the procedure on a wide swath of babies or boys.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 03:32 PM
4

The notion that the appendix is useless is a myth. Doctors often attribute such attributes to organs for which they do not have sufficient understanding. People with appendectomies have shorter lifespans. The Appendix Protects Us From Germs And Protects Good Bacteria I bet the appendix was even more essential for populations that were likely to eat unknown foods that caused gut problems.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 03:31 PM
2

Fair enough for individual medical needs; I meant indiscriminate across the board circumcisions.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 03:25 PM
8

it being actually needed medically Removal is not needed medically except on a case by case basis for certain individuals, like your appendix. If it were, evolution would have eliminated it. EDIT: added exception.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 01:11 PM
0

I find this short sketch very relevant. https://youtu.be/51-hepLP8J4
/r/MensRights28/04/19 05:35 PM
1

/u/vreddit_bot
/r/MensRights26/11/18 05:22 AM
1

If this rape results in a baby, would the rape survivor be forced to pay child support?
/r/MensRights14/10/18 12:27 AM
16

This is a misleading headline: Woman wins bid to access IVF without husband’s consent Unreasonable if it is his his sperm or they are a couple. Misleading headline. Woman wins bid to access IVF [from a sperm donor] without [estranged] husband’s consent Reasonable, and headline not misleading. I regret clicking and rewarding them with a page view. Hopefully others will not encourage their dishonest headline.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 01:10 PM
8

I think that is literary the justification for the ban.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 06:03 AM
4

Would proving you're not the biological father through a banned paternity test absolve you from child support duties?
/r/MensRights18/07/18 05:58 AM
3

Will her victim be legally liable for child support if this rape bears crotch fruit?
/r/MensRights29/06/18 01:35 AM
3

Even if you have a state license you can still be arrested and prosecuted by the US federal government. This is well known. It seems that the GOP only cares about state rights when they agree with the underlying issue.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 12:19 AM
-8

He changed his career to one which is still completely legal... Huh? Cannabis is still a Federal Class 1 narcotic. Sessions could prosecute him. Please explain how this is "completely legal." It is certainly ironic that his wife is abusing a legal though more harmful drug.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 01:51 PM
2

Such claims would be more credible and easier to disseminate if people would site a source to back their claims. Otherwise it's hard for these arguments to gain a foothold against the bombardment by opposing views.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 01:38 PM
1

By that logic, anyone who has children should not be sued.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 04:33 PM
12

If the child's mother fraudulently wrote his name on the birth certificate, he should be able to use her for the child support, court costs, and aggravation.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 03:17 AM
3

Honestly, neither gender should have to work that many hours per week. The work hours and vacation time offered to US employees is disgraceful compared to most "advanced" countries. The US labor force should revolt. It is certainly not the same in Europe.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 11:32 PM
6

The original graphic, besides showing the lowest estimate of false accusations, implies that falsely accused people are not reported to authorities, did not have to face trial, and were not jailed.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 03:14 PM
5

If it's not broke, don't break it. FTFY
/r/MensRights18/10/11 01:24 AM
1

I agree that the difference between the African and North American cultures are significant enough for the study to not apply in N.A. However, for some reason that puzzles me, I have never heard anyone bring up the fact that statistics on sexually active people cannot justify infant circumcisions.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 12:09 AM
1

I don't see the relevance of a study in sub Saharan Africa when it's applied to our significantly different lifestyle. I don't see the relevance of a study on sexually active adults in sub Saharan Africa when it's applied to **babies in North America. I do NOT believe for a second that our HIV rates would change significantly due to circumcision I do NOT believe that our HIV rates would change significantly due to circumcision of babies.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 08:18 AM
2

I think it is likely a mistake to attribute the motivation of your mother's abuse to extreme feminism; feminism is more likely a symptom rather than a cause of her abuse. Her abuse is more likely to be her reaction to feeling victimized in the past, most likely by a man. So both her feminism and her abuse of you are symptoms of how she responded to her past psychological injuries. It's also possible that she was not victimized directly, but she inherited such views from an influential person who…
/r/MensRights08/10/11 04:45 AM
5

The issue isn't just potential harm, but also the torture and child abuse, since chances are that the doctor did not use anesthesia.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 04:07 AM
6

Make the women pay. Make the liars pay. FTFY. They needn't be women to be false rape accusers.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 03:24 AM
1

The Florida Supreme Court recently ruled that a law that made it illegal to posses drugs without your knowledge was unconstitutional. They said the government would have to prove that the suspect knew they were carrying the drugs. The basic civil right protection that compelled that ruling must surely also apply in this case.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 01:08 PM
5

FYI this policeman has honored our request for an AMA here.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 05:21 PM
6

Also relevant is the policeman's parent comment. Please click on it and upvote it.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 01:30 PM
3

The question is: in what percentage of criminal cases does the defendant plead guilty to avoid a trial due to extortion and threats of long sentences from the prosecutor.
/r/MensRights16/06/11 07:11 AM
0

Probably fapping while he watched the whole thing go down?
/r/MensRights07/01/11 05:41 PM
2

Your question: Where is god in all this ? From the story: If you choose to follow a religion where, for example, devout Catholics who are trying to be good people are all going to Hell but child molestors go to Heaven (as long as they were "saved" at some point), that's your choice, but it's fucked up. Maybe a God who operates by those rules does exist. If so, fuck Him That's where god is in all this. And if I had to guess who raped him, it was probably a man of god, as in a priest or minister o…
/r/MensRights07/01/11 03:14 PM
1

A federal court ruled that the government does not need a warrant to read emails, or any data you keep on websites outside your home.
/r/MensRights27/12/10 01:22 PM
2

most of the women and all the older guys want women to go first in emergencies. [...] Several women tried to shame them (be a man) and then the leader closed the meeting since tensions were high. If I were the leader, I would have agreed: "OK, women go first. I also hereby give the women a 10% pay reduction, and the men a 10% pay raise because the men will be working a higher risk job." Whether or not that response causes the women to realize they were being sexist, I would recommend that they a…
/r/MensRights10/10/10 04:39 AM
2

The Four Horsemen of Marital Apocalypse. How many horsemen do you see? If you don't get out now you're just prolonging the inevitable. Get out before your injuries turn into bruises or deep scars.
/r/MensRights22/09/10 02:36 PM
0

We need a "follow [this thread]" link to give us an orange envelope so we don't have to keep returning here to check for an update.
/r/MensRights12/06/10 12:49 PM
2

Is it legal to record the event with a camera for your protection?
/r/MensRights21/03/10 05:42 AM
3

We should not convict people of crimes if they confess to them, because that would discourage people from confessing to crimes. Hmmm. If there are never any consequences for lying when one admits to lying, then people will continue to claim rape with impunity, since there's no consequence to lying even when you confess to it.
/r/MensRights21/09/09 04:26 AM
2

While this woman deserves jail time for lying, I'm glad police feel that they need the videotape to protect themselves, because in many cases it also protects police victims. The video should record at least whenever the police is out of the car. It should not be up to the discretion of the officer to not record an incident. Policeman: "I could have lost my home and my job." Not likely. Police routinely get away with misconduct. I don't know of any instance where there has been a consequence for…
/r/MensRights15/09/09 08:57 PM
2

This also belongs in the health subreddit. The submit button should allow cross-posting to multiple subreddits.
/r/MensRights28/08/09 02:23 PM
12

Fact: judgment No sexual desire for husband: not guilty Poor marital communication skills: guilty Marital dishonesty: guilty Not being able to orgasm: not guilty Projecting her problems onto all women: guilty Violating marital privacy: guilty Taking advantage of her husband: guilty
/r/MensRights21/08/09 07:52 PM
3

Such extreme views are obviously brought about by traumatized women. It's hard to blame them for how they deal with their trauma, as that is not entirely in their control. I blame the media for giving them a megaphone. Ironically, such extreme positions will not help heal other women and allow them to move on to a more normal life with healthy relationships. Therefore men are not the only victims. is it any wonder that false rape claims are an epidemic with misinformation being fed to our daught…
/r/MensRights19/08/09 07:36 PM
0

Thanks. We would all be better served if people linked to their sources, especially when making amazing claims such as this one.
/r/MensRights14/08/09 07:13 PM
1

41% false accusations Source?
/r/MensRights14/08/09 03:30 PM
1

men AND women must learn to accept that we ARE fundamentally different, but that does not make one sex superior to the other. Even once humanity collectively recognizes this, it only takes a few people in powerful legislative, judicial, or religious positions (which statistically will always exist) to keep things out of balance.
/r/MensRights14/08/09 03:12 PM
19

From the comments: It is sad that despite the overwhemling evidence supporting circumcision as an effective defense against sexually transmitted diseases, I don't think babies should be having sex. In fact, I did not know that they could. I agree with Miss Kitten that babies probably are more sensitive to pain but the claim is not that the child feels less pain but rather they will not have a recollection of the pain that they felt if the circumcision was done at an age before awareness. Right, …
/r/MensRights26/07/09 03:09 AM
1

This bill would not result in equal rights; it would allow a man to dictate what a woman must submit her body to, while giving the woman no say over the man's body: that's not equal. Conversely, the current system where the woman alone decides whether the man will be a father, and forces the man to pay child support, even if the conception was deceptive, accidental, non-mutual, or not approved, is not equal either.
/r/MensRights24/07/09 06:43 AM
1

Keep in mind that if she fraudulently framed her husband for threatening her, that does not mean that her husband did not threaten her before. It is possible that he had threatened her, and she "lost it" when he got away with it, so she decided to frame him to "get justice." Nonetheless, if she framed him she deserves what she gets. This reminds me of the OJ case. It is probably likely that he killed her, and then the police framed him to ensure a conviction (oops).
/r/MensRights17/07/09 05:03 AM
2

He travels to exotic locales -- to Kenya, Tanzania, Alaska -- to hunt big game. The stuffed wild boar, Cape buffalo and kodiak bear displayed in his homes testify to his prowess. "There's a cheetah on the wall," she said. "Yep," Jagels replied. "That's an endangered species, Ed." "Yep," Jagels said, giggling mischievously. Yep, he's definitely a pervert. Someone should feed him to the bears.
/r/MensRights13/07/09 04:53 PM
2

We cannot expect people to keep on doing the dirty, dangerous, outdoor jobs while telling them that their wages are to be the same as other people who do office tasks of similar qualifications but in safe, indoor settings. FTFY. EDIT: don't you find it annoying to be downvoted with no explanation? Is is laziness or cowardice?
/r/MensRights01/07/09 07:02 PM
2

Fibonacci numbers. Thanks. Math is great. Nature is great. Anonymity is great.
/r/MensRights29/06/09 05:05 AM
1

If you offer to help her out of this rut it has great potential to strengthen your relationship. I think if you offer to help her it will weaken the relationship: she will become even more dependent on you, and less independent as a person. She will also learn how to freeload off you. Take away her credit card; it is a big facilitator. Tell her to stop smoking pot Realize that she's not the ambitious person you fell in love with Mentally prepare yourself to leave her Give her an ultimatum For an…
/r/MensRights29/06/09 04:41 AM
1

The evidence as shown here speaks loudly and clearly to premeditation Please elaborate. I saw no such evidence. Decisions she made afterwards would have been made in a panic, with fear of being blamed. That is not evidence of guilt, it's evidence of fear of the authorities. The history of violence would add important context to this article. Without it, so much is left to speculation There has to be some powerful bias at work Plea bargaining.
/r/MensRights27/06/09 06:44 AM
2

It would be nice if the "up votes" and "down votes" totals listed in columns whether the votes were cast by people who followed the title link or read the comments. total link comments neither points 26 ? ? ? up votes 41 ? ? ? down votes 15 ? ? ? It would also be nice if we could click on a username and see an aggregation of that user's voting habit. It would make it easy to see if users read the comments or follow the links before voting, or if they're habitual upvoters or downvoters. Another i…
/r/MensRights25/06/09 06:04 AM
9

I've been downmodded for simply describing the female perspective, even though I was not promoting it. My general guideline for whether to downmod something is whether I consider it to have wasted my time, or whether a comment was rude or offensive. My upmods far outnumber my downmods.
/r/MensRights25/06/09 05:52 AM
1

Ban all corporate political contributions. If you don't have a heartbeat, you cannot make a donation. Implement proportional representation rather than the ridiculous and corrupt two-party system.
/r/MensRights24/06/09 04:27 AM
1

You are precisely correct. Explaining; not supporting. Thanks for pointing that out. I also thought it was disingenuous and inflammatory to state that it was "To Put Men Out of Work." Polarization does not help either cause. However, I'm not going to complain if more money is funneled into education: it's been underfunded for so long.
/r/MensRights23/06/09 07:05 AM
0

I think you are under the delusion that Congress represents the people rather than the lobbyists and campaign contributors.
/r/MensRights23/06/09 02:06 AM
-1

As I said in my earlier comment, a large bill for "human infrastructure" would never pass.
/r/MensRights23/06/09 12:08 AM
0

This money was to help those sectors that suffered most from the economic downturn True, but my point referred to the inequity already existing in society, and the motivation behind that opportunism.
/r/MensRights22/06/09 11:55 PM
1

it was done for sexist reasons. Agreed. But more money flowing to education can only be a good thing. Perhaps it will reduce classroom sizes, thereby improving educational quality. I'm in favor of green jobs and a more efficient transportation infrastructure. But those funds had better not go to new roads that promote growth for growth's sake. "Anyone who believes exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world is either a madman or an economist." Kenneth_E._Boulding
/r/MensRights22/06/09 11:47 PM
-10

This is a good article. However, the goal of the feminists was not "To Put Men Out of Work." Their goal was to grab some of that public handout while it was flowing. People are free to choose higher paying jobs that are tied to the economy or lower paying jobs that are recession proof. There is a parallel between those who now want compensation for their temporary loss of work and those who want compensation for their recession proof underpaid jobs. While those hurt by the financial corruption v…
/r/MensRights22/06/09 07:16 PM
2

Paying child support for illegitimate children can be avoided by instituting laws that would require DNA proof of paternity for all child support applications. Such laws would also reduce false claims, and may even reduce infidelity or paternity entrapment. There should also be legal consequences for filing false paternity claims.
/r/MensRights16/12/08 05:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter