TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

12yuGemoS Archive

View 0 posts and 78 comments by 12yuGemoS on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
20

You didn't do anything wrong and her response was ridiculous, I highly recommend trying to attend therapy with them to help with the issues she's having coping after giving birth. Best wishes for you and your family man, good luck pushing through this.
/r/MensRights05/05/20 08:37 PM
3

You hopefully can appreciate that your comment cast mine in a horrible light by not also saying they're of similar ages
/r/MensRights04/05/20 07:48 PM
3

They're high schoolers talking about high schoolers
/r/MensRights04/05/20 07:39 PM
9

People want to have sex with a sex they're attracted to, how is talking about that "sexualizing" anything? Humans are constitutionally sexual beings with sexual desires. Men and women talking openly about their sexual desires doesn't have broader implications other than men and women have sexual desires and it's fun to talk about them with friends. This idea that men are trash for having sexual desires that involve women, and that men sometimes talk about that or otherwise express it, demonizes …
/r/MensRights04/05/20 06:51 PM
6

I think the problem the guy likely had was that she disrespected him publicly and put him in a bad, embarrassing situation he had no other dignified way out of
/r/MensRights04/05/20 06:14 PM
2

Imagine if men started using the "bitches be crazy" phrase like feminists use "boys will be boys" to shame and demonize an entire sex in popular songs and culture
/r/MensRights03/05/20 05:40 PM
3

I would take a combined approach of making light of her concern with jokes and making the point that she's shaming you for having a masculine and productive approach to dealing with your issues, which instead of being supportive adds to your problems.
/r/MensRights03/05/20 05:38 PM
1

I think it's accurate to say that men are more vulnerable to being convinced to engage in violence and crime because that's similar to historical roles for us, hunting and fighting other tribes, but that being taken advantage of by criminal organizations is by no means an inherent trait of men, it's being put into a position where society provides rewards for doing so and/or doesn't provide other more safe options.
/r/MensRights03/05/20 05:11 PM
3

Aside from the issue of men being arrested far easier than women in general and especially when it comes to sex-related crimes, the problem with men committing crime is mainly an issue of poverty, lack of fathers, and the expectation (promoted by women) of men being providers. If women were the ones disproportionately victims of criminal subcultures, they'd come up with all kinds of reasons for it, but men can't be afforded any kind of sociological analysis in these minds. If men got the same go…
/r/MensRights03/05/20 04:30 PM
8

I actually do treat hysterical feminists that seem to have been abused by a guy like this, although sometimes it's hard to tell if it's genuine or from self-imposed PTSD from reading too much radical feminism. But dogs don't have access to cognitive behavioral therapy and other mental health services. Dogs also don't spread hatred about men on the Internet, you can't put out blatant irrational hatred and expect the targets to be silent about it. Anyways, the point of this post was to try to make…
/r/MensRights03/05/20 04:15 PM
2

Tbh she's probably just trying to shame the guy into silence by blowing up something she barely feels
/r/MensRights03/05/20 04:08 PM
1

It would be nice if feminists weren't actively demonizing men in popular media constantly. Intent matters of course but when you have a popular media that regularly speaks negatively on men and denies us justice in their discourse, with a current example being the claim that Covid-19 is mostly affecting women negatively despite male deaths being much higher, I'm not sure you can make your argument. Feminism combined with a gynocentric outlook most people have by default means that men can't get …
/r/MensRights01/05/20 09:54 PM
3

It should always be said that the reason manspreading became a thing for feminists is penis envy, there's no other reason anyone would feel oppressed by something so petty
/r/MensRights01/05/20 09:13 PM
1

There is no actual research that leads to the broader conclusions on patriarchy or privilege, nor is there a base of research that looks into the effects of "traditional masculinity" in a way that would make their conclusions scientifically based and objective. There is no acknowledgement of its positive aspects, and like I said, it takes possible negative outcomes out of context to demonize entire norms and styles of thought men have developed over centuries of dealing with the real world and e…
/r/MensRights01/05/20 08:22 PM
2

They say blatantly that "traditional masculinity" is bad over and over again in that paper dude, their examples are selected purely to point out a bad side to demonize the whole thing and men as a sex for our typical behaviors. It's not evidence-based, since there is none cited in the document, and it promotes treatment of men that is qualitatively different from women, in that men are seen first as potential threats to others, and also promotes not treating them according to their own moral cli…
/r/MensRights01/05/20 02:46 PM
2

How can you promote the APA's guidelines for men and boys and pretend you're not helping to demonize men? The entire point of those guidelines was to push the feminist narrative onto therapists of men, even against the APA's own standards for how to deal with patients in a manner that respects their subjectivity. They call several healthy masculine behaviors unhealthy with zero evidence cited and take a biased view in each case. They even relabeled toxic masculinity as traditional masculinity to…
/r/MensRights30/04/20 10:33 PM
2

Tell that to feminists and make them stick with it, because what drives their usage of the term is misandry, and they'll label healthy stoicism as toxic masculinity as easily as they would anything else, because really they hate men and envy our good qualities. The APA basically label-swapped toxic masculinity with traditional masculinity, then said stoicism (with no additional qualification) was unhealthy for men.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 10:25 PM
1

"Toxic masculinity" is a fake construct to help spin basically any male behavior feminists want to as bad. It's a term for demonization to Otherize men and our behavior so that they can say anything negative they want about us, even when they promote the same behaviors among themselves, to justify whatever they want to justify. If you take care to notice how often it's hypocritical, how much it obscures real issues through unscientific thinking, and how convenient all the results are for feminis…
/r/MensRights30/04/20 10:17 PM
2

I guarantee you men have, mostly in silence, let women steal sheets for centuries.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 05:58 PM
3

The downfall of men's magazines is embarrassing more than anything
/r/MensRights30/04/20 03:32 PM
2

Men and even women are attracted to breasts because humans use sexual circuitry for the drive to feed from breasts as infants, so it's certainly unique in that regard. It's also identified with desirable maternal significance broadly, which men are sexually attracted to like with certain shapes of hips and things like that. There's a reason breast play is pleasurable for the person performing in addition to the person receiving. It's not simply due to a taboo or it being sexualized by culture. H…
/r/MensRights30/04/20 02:13 AM
7

The journal is explicitly feminist, so it's probably even worse, although I wasn't able to get full access. Here's how they describe themselves: Sex Roles: A Journal of Research is a global, multidisciplinary, scholarly, social and behavioral science journal with a feminist perspective. It publishes original research reports as well as original theoretical papers and conceptual review articles that explore how gender organizes people’s lives and their surrounding worlds, including gender identit…
/r/MensRights25/04/20 05:24 PM
3

The research finds that while children's hostile sexism decreased with age for both boys and girls, benevolent sexism decreased with age only for girls. So basically this is attacking boys for being simps...? Victoria University's Dr Matthew Hammond said the data shows that some principles taught to young children are gendered and could be harmful down the track. Since we know that lack of "benevolent sexism" is seen as being misogynistic from other research, maybe the issue is that boys are at …
/r/MensRights25/04/20 05:19 PM
4

Citation needed lmao. If you follow their sources it's just made up feminist nonsense that they're pretending has an actual basis in fact despite there being no research mentioned. Even then, many of the statements involve things that aren't even talked about in the cited sources, you'd have to have a tremendous ability to stretch things to even think about it being justified. This was probably written by someone told what to write about and what agenda to push ahead of time, and who then looked…
/r/MensRights24/04/20 07:46 PM
6

I'd honestly like to see a study on this lol
/r/MensRights24/04/20 02:53 PM
9

Less deadly than the common flu despite killing more people in a single month than the flu does in a year within the US: https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/04/coronavirus-kills-more-americans-in-one-month-than-the-flu-kills-in-one-year/
/r/MensRights24/04/20 02:52 PM
11

If that was true, the actual rate of rape accusations that don't have enough evidence to be prosecuted is, like, 65% according to the FBI (not including known false accusations). We don't know if they are true or false. No feminists, nor anyone else I'm aware of, say those are false accusations. Obviously this guy is a monster but using an anecdote like this is tremendously misleading. Also, who says women should get life for a false accusation? Sounds like a strawman to me. What I usually hear …
/r/MensRights24/04/20 02:24 PM
8

Since you brought up confirmation bias, I'll be as honest as possible. I'm probably good at feeling a room and knowing what I can get away with -- I've stated anti-feminist perspectives without being called anti-feminist in offline interactions with women plenty. As long as you appeal to real common sense and aren't an actual misogynist, I find only the feminist Believers would start an actual argument instead of enjoying a playful back-and-forth. That said, I used to be a feminist and know how …
/r/MensRights24/04/20 01:30 PM
4

No, she should have left even if he was abusive, clearly. This is a tangent, because I don't think it's relevant here given the health status of the man, but the only justification I can think of for killing your partner is if your life is in danger. She lives in the UK and could have very easily gotten out of an abusive situation if she was in one. Especially considering he could not walk. I think this kind of reasoning when it comes to a spousal killing is mostly from women trying to get away …
/r/MensRights24/04/20 12:27 PM
31

Yes, surely it's more hard to leave a supposedly abusive man who can't walk than to kill him as he lay in bed. Before the attack, Ramanathan had become "very angry" at finding out her husband had written to Sri Lankan police accusing her brother of fraud and theft, according to the prosecution. Mhm, was he right? Why did he do it? What was the fraud and theft? Stephen Kamlish QC, defending, insisted the killing was unplanned. He suggested that if the defendant had wanted to kill her diabetic hus…
/r/MensRights24/04/20 12:42 AM
10

What a terrible and tragic situation. I really feel sorry for the kids. I can't help but think if we had a society that held women accountable for their actions this kind of thing would happen a lot less.
/r/MensRights23/04/20 02:45 PM
12

She wants to see a time where being a female in a lead part is no longer a talking point. You can blame feminism for this as much as you can directors and writers being mostly men Anyways, I'm all for inclusion and would like to see more interesting stories from other perspectives as long as it's genuine and not cringe politics, but when you actively say you don't want to work with rooms full of certain types of people we have a problem. You get millions from big-budget movies for playing mascul…
/r/MensRights22/04/20 03:57 PM
22

Why is it men's fault that feminism whipped them up into a mass paranoia where they feel afraid to go outside, using misleading statistics and emotional abuse akin to that of a narcissistic parent to enforce fear?
/r/MensRights22/04/20 02:37 PM
15

Feminism would just seem like the embarrassing, pathetic ramblings of a spoiled child always trying to get their way if it didn't have so much institutional power
/r/MensRights22/04/20 02:30 PM
2

Right? My mans wrote Lord of the Flies and then became lord of the simps in Facebook memes posthumously. How much can you degrade yourself for gynocentrism?
/r/MensRights22/04/20 04:29 AM
2

I assume they don't care about the seeds and pods getting in the way from female trees and clogging up things since they're not the ones who actually have to clean it up
/r/MensRights22/04/20 04:21 AM
11

From my understanding this is actually a pretty common argument from feminists on why men successfully commit suicide more often
/r/MensRights22/04/20 04:15 AM
5

Borderline Personality Disorder
/r/MensRights22/04/20 01:19 AM
1

Most of the left doesn't subscribe to these beliefs, and is also if not anti-post-structuralism, at least ambivalent. The majority of the left worldwide is in third world countries, India, and China in different socialist groups. Western leftism? Sure, the majority of leftists in the West are feminist like this, but not everyone on the left in the West subscribes to Western leftism. Certainly not most of the left worldwide.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 12:52 AM
7

Comparing women being called "Karen" for acting like annoying entitled assholes to a word that came out of a history of colonialism, slavery, Jim Crow, enforced poverty, and violent hostility from orgs like the KKK is a complete Karen move
/r/MensRights21/04/20 04:02 PM
7

It's an excuse to be a selfish sociopath in all relations with men, it's not a rational position but one based in envy, seeing men as having something they don't so to get back at us they demand gifts with no gestures of reciprocity. It's really typical envious behavior. If they also deny that men do anything for them, you can sprinkle some narcissism on that. Take and take to gas themselves up, while not even being able to recognize the contributions of men, at least not without first recognizi…
/r/MensRights21/04/20 03:56 PM
18

This malicious narcissism behind some accusations needs to be brought up more. I don't know her actual intentions obviously, but it seems likely that some of the people that do things like this want to make a big impact purely to feel important, proportionally to what they were able to pull off. Getting a frat shut down, basically ruining something generations of men might've partaken in and possibly getting individuals into trouble, is a huge W for a malicious narcissist that hates men, or at l…
/r/MensRights21/04/20 03:20 PM
2

Maybe when they say "harmful" in the phrase "harmful gender roles and stereotypes" we should hear it as though they are speaking only for themselves. If it isn't harmful to them, it isn't a harmful gender role or stereotype. This one is not only not harmful to them, but is extremely beneficial.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 05:23 AM
7

Yeah, that's exactly why, I was confused by the jokes in my early teens before me and my friends joked about masturbation more and I realized it was just the circumcised guys who used stuff for lubricant. No surprise that circumcision was historically used to dissuade masturbation and pre-marital sex.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 06:02 PM
3

The hilarious thing is that capitalism does whatever makes the most profit, which is right now resulting in wide-spread misandry and a complete absence of appreciation of masculinity and men's roles. Capitalism has always had men at the bottom as well, treating us the worst and like garbage. The idea that capitalism is particularly anti-woman or patriarchal is just false.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 01:34 AM
1

The 2nd world used to refer to the socialist bloc, but I think it's just an outdated term at this point, and an outdated set of terms since the Cold War no longer exists. If you're still using it, it's probably correct to include it, but at this point it's probably not a useful way of designating countries. Like, Ethiopia would considered 2nd world due to its socialist history, but that's one of the poorest countries in the world.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 01:21 AM
26

Then maybe that's the retained sensitivity from having a foreskin within the last 5 years, which could give you some idea of the difference in terms of sensitivity. The spot of sensitivity from the area that was under the foreskin prior feels extremely painful from any kind of actual handjob (as in not just rubbing) without lubricant. Other stuff is usually fine since some kind of natural lubricant will be there. I've never tried anal though (not really interested) so I don't know about that.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 12:11 AM
68

I was circumcised as an adult for a medical reason and let me tell you... the difference is huge, especially for handjobs. I didn't really ever need lube with a foreskin. A handjob is something I fear now because so many women have no idea what they're doing, and it can be torture, you sit there having this person, like, basically trying to tear one of the most sensitive parts of your body, if not the most sensitive.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 11:35 PM
93

Literally removal of the foreskin can do all those for men and is certainly part of the male sex organ. Try doing anything sexual with your dick as a man without foreskin when you don't have sufficient lubricant, natural or otherwise -- it's torture. FGM is horrible but jfc the double standards and complete lack of awareness.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 10:50 PM
2

Even if it's not a person telling you to man up or anyone shaming you, this still seems to be the case. When I had to come out and be vulnerable due to issues I was having, I got the support I needed from those who were my family and ACTUAL friends (fake friends caused a lot of the problems) and am enormously grateful, but I still learned that the world isn't suitable for men being vulnerable. Even if you have the support, the world will kick you in the teeth until you learn you have to be stron…
/r/MensRights19/04/20 10:17 PM
2

Most apps don't even let you send pictures. I've heard girls complain about guys sending them dick pics on dating apps when their apps don't have that feature, because most haven't for years at this point. The only one I know of that allows it is Bumble, and they require the woman to send a message first, plus blur out images sent at first so you unblur it if you think it's fine iirc.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 10:07 PM
2

I think it's mostly from being polite and taught to treat women like that, not because of thinking women are less capable of things, even if that is some of the historical background. I also usually do better with women I date when I open doors and do things like that too, and I imagine since I live in a fairly progressive area, that's true pretty broadly, so that's also a reward in that context. I don't know a guy who would think, unless the situation really called for it like helping someone m…
/r/MensRights19/04/20 04:17 PM
2

Yeah, this is the story I found with more of the info in it: https://www.cartoonbrew.com/ideas-commentary/exclusive-clarence-creator-skyler-page-out-of-cartoon-network-after-sexual-assault-allegations-101061.html She did bring it to HR too, but the main response people had was from her tweets. I didn't notice it was from 2014 either until shortly after I wrote everything hahaha
/r/MensRights19/04/20 03:39 AM
2

Relative to men they are, it just doesn't matter that much anymore
/r/MensRights19/04/20 01:52 AM
2

Here's some more context about what happened around these events: Skyler is currently in the hospital receiving treatment for mental illness. Specifically a form of Bipolar 1 that results in prolonged psychotic episodes, not sleeping for days, and erratic, sometimes frightening behavior that mimics schizophrenia. On the same day the assault happened, Skyler also walked through the streets shirtless screaming at cops. I saw him try to smoke cigarettes through his nose and drink days old olive jui…
/r/MensRights19/04/20 12:56 AM
3

Women have had ladies first for forever, then claim they're not equal, then when it's equality day about promoting equality they ask for ladies first, a benefit women have had given to them by men for centuries
/r/MensRights19/04/20 12:30 AM
7

This is positive behavior for fathering, although the picture is maybe a bit extreme, it teaches boys to feel comfortable in the world and feel safe within more dangerous circumstances, both great for coping with the stresses of being a man. Boys love this stuff too. Not to mention taking pride in their father's strength and identifying with it, also positive. I mean, it's also positive for girls to some degree, it's not limited to boys. One of the father's key roles is making children feel safe…
/r/MensRights18/04/20 02:29 AM
4

A wife will spend 80% of a man's money and get by far the most from the gift exchanges that happen and then have an army of feminists screaming about how going and spending most the dude's money and getting the most benefit from his work that she did basically nothing herself to earn is oppression because she was expected to do maybe 3 hours of relatively easy work a day. With young kids it's probably about even, but otherwise, jfc the lunacy.
/r/MensRights17/04/20 10:29 PM
2

What "institutional power" is there in any in-person abuse? I guess aside from the institutional power of getting men arrested and charged with a crime that will ruin his reputation at will?
/r/MensRights17/04/20 10:07 PM
8

I had a girlfriend that got into arguments with me whenever I said I enjoyed any physical features about her because that always suddenly was objectifying not only to the exclusion of her personality but the single part of her body to the exclusion of other parts -- literally I complimented her intellect all the time, but because I said I liked her breasts suddenly that was a lie and I only liked her for her looks and was even mentally chopping her body up to enjoy. Like, my compliment was made …
/r/MensRights17/04/20 01:32 PM
0

It's being vindictive against women in general for aggressive feminists and their hateful ideology, it's not targeting the right group. It's like when people target men in general for the actions of a few powerful ones, when most men through history have been treated as expendable workhorses.
/r/MensRights17/04/20 01:12 PM
1

These are just narcissist thought patterns. Feminists tend to fall back onto narcissistic styles of thought, so I could see making a connection with that, but most women, like most men, don't feel good that someone they're trying to see disappoints them. This gassing up of themselves is a defense from dealing with how destructive they are as narcissists, but that side also exists behind this kind of thinking. This kind of person doesn't live a happy life.
/r/MensRights17/04/20 01:05 PM
4

I think the idea that it takes place in locker rooms is probably from '80s movies or something, but between my feminist days where I tried to discipline my locker room talk and now where I have some close friends I do it with without restriction, I'd say I have a much healthier mental state from not repressing thoughts and can relate with women better because I no longer put them on a pedestal. Most people do this kind of thing in ways that are fine -- men and women both engage in this kind of t…
/r/MensRights17/04/20 11:43 AM
2

Tbh I think everyone should be allowed to speak their mind, locker room talk is hilarious and lets men vent while keeping their heads right as long as it isn't among genuine misogynists. I'm happy for women who get to do similar as long as they aren't genuine misandrists.
/r/MensRights17/04/20 11:33 AM
0

No, it's that you're being so vindictive wrt to feminism that you want something that goes against all women just to spite a minority of aggressive feminists, which is pretty sexist imo too. If it's a religious or moral position, fine, but if it's really because you want to limit all women out of spite that's problematic.
/r/MensRights17/04/20 11:21 AM
7

SJWs invented the idea that sexism, racism, and or any other -ism they're talking about only applies when it's an "oppressor" group talking about an "oppressed" group so that they can't be held accountable for being some of the biggest bigots out there
/r/MensRights16/04/20 11:34 PM
2

Simone de Beauvoir the big-time feminist admitted women could be catty in Second Sex, which was written before that period, but sure it was men who did it to try to keep women out of the office. They really can't see how paranoid this is. Patriarchy is like any other paranoid construct, it serves the function of "connecting the dots" through a pre-determined logic to find the solution you want.
/r/MensRights16/04/20 11:13 PM
1

Nah when the APA is out here using ideas like this to try to ruin male mental health care I'm out of patience for entertaining it
/r/MensRights14/04/20 10:33 PM
3

Reminds me of this video about a women only group on a survival show: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1x5IqnT160o
/r/MensRights14/04/20 10:01 PM
2

I think we disagree on some things but I appreciate the thoughtful response!
/r/MensRights13/04/20 05:43 PM
9

You have to look at the broader context, let's take the APA for an example, "toxic masculinity" was retermed "traditional masculinity" and was used to create the idea that masculine gender roles in general are bad and therapists should convince men to be more feminine. "Toxic masculinity" is a term that refers to what people don't like about men in any particular moment and demonizes that behavior without looking at why men have taken on certain roles and ideas and what benefits they have even i…
/r/MensRights12/04/20 12:50 PM
3

It's bullshit in general, but women actually have "power over" men in most cases through using sex as a reward. In sexual relations, women have the power until men take it, and then if the women doesn't approve of that taking you can say it's rape. Wrt emotional neediness... LOL -- if straight women could only feel what it's like to be in a relationship with them. To be more specific, this kind of thinking comes from Michel Foucault. Functionally it becomes a mechanism of creating victimhood and…
/r/MensRights11/04/20 02:40 PM
17

Lmfao, feminists will say the alpha/beta dichotomy is fake and then put up articles with caricatures of alphas and betas about how they act toward alphas and betas exactly how any experienced guy would think they would. Anyways, women who write this kind of crap are disgusting and their men should've left them years ago.
/r/MensRights11/04/20 02:28 PM
6

Trudeau has played it up for the feminists to gain favor since he wanted to get elected. Wrt Canada still taking influence from Britain after all these years... I mean... really guys? It's an embarrassing system that these days plays very well as a reality TV special but seems demeaning as a way to organize government decisions. Maybe consider a form of parliament that allows for dignity to take place.
/r/MensRights11/04/20 01:56 AM
3

This is hilarious, btw why would you organize your parliament like Britain? Cut the umbilical cord please Canada, how long has it been jfc. Pretty ridiculous that something like this would happen in general, but if there's anyone I'm not bothered by it happening to it's this dude.
/r/MensRights10/04/20 08:52 PM
4

I was a bit confused about this since it apparently started on the last section because of the link, but there's a lot more context above that. Almost had a hot take that was unjustified after reading more of the article.
/r/MensRights10/04/20 08:45 PM
6

Women who don't want to be mothers tend to have had issues with their own mothers, and like any of these types of subs where something else aside from what is explicit is involved, if they're confronted they toss you out to continue ignoring their own issues. That's not to say they should be judged for having the issues, just that the behavior and ways of dealing with things could be better. Anyone who says it's a problem if we live in a child-centric world is just... ugh. IF ONLY! We've seen wo…
/r/MensRights09/04/20 08:55 PM
3

Women obsessed with pitbulls are some of the biggest psychos out there. They have a disturbed obsession with these animals, thinking they're just being misunderstood despite being significantly more dangerous than others for several reasons, including being bred for fighting. It's never the pitbull's fault, it's always the owners or something else. If the dog raped the boy, it's because the dog's needs weren't being met or something, and the dog is the real victim. As usual, males being victims …
/r/MensRights08/04/20 10:25 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter