TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

14446368 Archive

View 0 posts and 62 comments by 14446368 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
20

Well let's see. 1. Society made fun of all of their concerns and worries. 2. All of their heroes were cast down and castigated. 3. They were purposefully and multiplicatively discriminated against, and told that this was justice for crimes they didn't do. 4. You undermined traditional things that men gravitate to, including religion, the military, sports, higher education, careers, etc. Gee, really hard to figure this out.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 11:37 AM
1

... it's typically the men, who are more disagreeable, that demand the need for respect be demonstrated.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 05:49 PM
72

Wait for a literal decade plus to start a family, despite most high quality eggs being made available prior to your 30th birthday. Discover this isn't possible due to testicular cancer in your guy, which didn't exist in your early years. Decide the way he handles the fact he's dying is selfish... despite him being the one effing dying, at a young age, with unaccomplished dreams. Complain no one asks how you're doing when you're not the one dying (which, btw, I find suspect). Be overly shocked by…
/r/MensRights23/06/23 08:04 PM
3

Just bring on the fucking revolution already. We need a return to justice and decency.
/r/MensRights20/06/23 02:19 AM
3

artficial sperms And who would develop this technology? Men. I don't pay any attention to things that... Are inherently anti-human. Are inherently against nature and God. Rely on technology to an insane degree to be persistently possible. And neither should you.
/r/MensRights01/06/23 07:39 PM
9

It is because the very concept of "group privilege" is Grade A bullshit that leads to a whole lot of resentment and anger, division, inequality, double standards, etc.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 02:47 AM
1

I can't wait til they apply the same logic/question to, say, racial differences.
/r/MensRights27/12/22 06:30 PM
3

Oh look, a moral conundrum caused by an evil act. Who would've thunk it.
/r/AntiFeminists23/09/22 12:57 PM
6

"Group justice" is injustice. What a piece of shit.
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/22 03:31 PM
49

Sadly that's exactly how it works. The pursuit of the glorious utopia means anything in the way of it is evil. “Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of…
/r/AntiFeminists23/08/22 01:38 PM
2

Imagine thinking positive population growth would be even remotely possible for a species with this high a maternal mortality.
/r/AntiFeminists23/08/22 01:17 PM
0

The quick version of all of this is... I am pro-life. No, or at least EXCEPTIONALLY rare, exceptions for rape/incest (really shitty hand dealt, but it's certainly not "fixed" by killing a baby that had no say in its conception, in essence it's a second victim of these acts). We have to be careful and specific with the term "abortion." Things like ectopic pregnancy, which can only be treated in a way that ultimately results in the death of the baby, are not considered abortions. I see a very star…
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/22 01:23 PM
4

The claim is false on its face. Women are overrepresented at all levels of educational attainment. No, the average woman cannot do as much manual, physical work as a man. There's a reason I'm the one putting up drywall and digging in the yard and my wife doesn't. This assumes that women and men are exactly the same and have the same interests, strengths, weaknesses, etc. in which case diversity is impossible/nonsensical. It further assumes a vast male conspiracy, as if such a thing were possible…
/r/AntiFeminists02/08/22 04:39 PM
1

Imagine the hubris to think we're "beyond" being just angry apes in the jungle. At any point that precious "peaceful" existence can fucking shatter. Imagine the idiocy to think male sexual drive isn't also productive. Men worked very hard to hone their crafts, to build mighty things, so that they and their progeny and their fellow countrymen would be taken care of, secured, surrounded by glory, etc., And yes, part of that was to attract women to join and grow the family. The absolute idiocy and …
/r/AntiFeminists29/07/22 01:30 PM
1

Fair, albeit I'd argue the "traditional man" view is likely a bit more reconcilable with reality on most issues (though certainly not all!).
/r/MensRights28/07/22 05:58 PM
2

Ah, I see. Thanks for the explanation. Very surprised by that... really dumb move, and supposedly from the party that "doesn't" hate men.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 04:17 PM
1

I mean, they're "optional" in that a patient and/or the patient's legal guardian can deny care... but if you're talking to the doctor, they say "your next appointment is in [x] weeks, when do you want to specifically schedule." They DON'T say "yeah, whatever, next appointment for fun whenever you want I guess." It's the doctor-way of saying "you really, really should do this, so I'll sound like I'm telling you, but you could say no, but I'm trying to prevent that from even entering your thought …
/r/MensRights27/07/22 02:24 PM
0

So the anatomy scan ultrasounds that ensure the child's heart is working, its organs are in the right place, its development is on track, its fingers and toes are numbered correctly, it brain is the right size and shape, its arteries are correctly positioned and have the right measurements, etc.... are just "for the mom"?
/r/MensRights27/07/22 10:27 AM
-3

Fair enough, but it also seems to be the "appeasement GOP" trying to make the overturning of Roe v Wade more palatable to independents/democrats. If I wasn't so cynical of the neutered "republican party," I'd say it was a concerted effort to remove that talking point, but of course that's not true. It's just bullshit. To be clear, I do not support this bill in the slightest. Just more-or-less took a bit of umbrage with the idea that there are "no costs" associated with pregnancy, which is surely…
/r/MensRights27/07/22 10:25 AM
3

Sure, but for those who are not on medicaid, or otherwise do not qualify/are not enrolled in that or other programs, there are costs. I am currently on an 18-month payment plan for my youngest son's birth, which was uneventful and nearly textbook, and both my wife and I are employed and have health insurance. It's unenjoyable.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 10:20 AM
25

I don't understand how a child that isn't eating or wearing clothes, even, needs financial support. There are medical procedures, tests, etc. that need to happen. Ultrasounds aren't free. That being said, the proponents of said bill are, once again, wanting it both ways. "It's not a person, I can kill it. Also, please pay for its needs." What?
/r/MensRights27/07/22 02:38 AM
-2

May get downvoted here, but I think this is the wrong move. Don't just leave a kid at a preschool all alone. Get him to the mom, and then determine what to do (including gtfo, absolutely his right). Poor kid.
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/22 04:35 PM
1

We gotta play the long game. Everyone who is a reasonable human should absolutely have kids, preferably above the replacement rate. Wait 20 years, and oh look, "woke" is seen as the pseudoreligion it is and is denigrated at every turn.
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 02:48 PM
2

Orcs.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 04:30 PM
5

"We've been suppressed for ages." Bitch, the women who were "oppressed" before you would think your life is both soft as shit and disgusting. Don't claim some sort of sisterhood through time, or ownership of their struggles.
/r/AntiFeminists31/05/22 07:34 PM
49

This isn't even a politician. This is a fucking Supreme Court Justice.
/r/AntiFeminists09/05/22 01:47 AM
7

1,000% based, for a number of reasons. Prior to Roe v Wade, this was seen as a grave moral issue AND a states issue. 30 states had laws regulating (which is allowing under certain conditions) and/or banning abortion. That's the point of this country. If Group A wants something, and Group B doesn't, one shouldn't be able to compel the other except in very specific, limited, and important circumstances. The foundations of Roe v Wade and Casey v Planned Parenthood were faulty and overreaching. They…
/r/AntiFeminists03/05/22 01:47 PM
3

No one is pro-abortion This is a blatant lie.
/r/AntiFeminists03/05/22 01:24 PM
5

It's the "sneaky fucker" strategy. There are a few examples in nature where males will basically pretend to be submissive in the presence of dominant males, so the dominant male thinks they're not a threat. Then, when the dominant male is preoccupied, the submissive male will basically try to fuck all the females. That's what I think is going on, at the end of the day. EDIT: I think there are parallels to be drawn here to white guilt and other seemingly suicidal tendencies in certain groups of p…
/r/AntiFeminists06/04/22 01:15 PM
3

Yuuup. There's the whole "be IN the world, but not OF the world" thing, but that apparently got missed in her translation.
/r/AntiFeminists15/03/22 01:39 PM
1

Based and tradwife-pilled.
/r/AntiFeminists14/03/22 01:37 PM
2

"I want my rights." Then fight and die for them. That's the only way they're secured.
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 05:51 PM
2

I'm shocked, absolutely shocked I tell you.
/r/AntiFeminists25/02/22 01:35 AM
5

They're playing on emotions. Say "Cancel student debt for all" and a lot of people, very reasonably I might add, respond with "no, that'll cause more issues than it's worth, there are bigger problems with doing that, etc." Say "cancel student debt for women" and suddenly the emotions are changed. It's now about helping "poor, manipulated" women, and "well, at least it's not EVERYONE." I don't understand why all of feminism is succinctly wrapped up in "It should not cost me." Give me an entitleme…
/r/AntiFeminists24/02/22 02:40 PM
4

Dude, this is old news. I'm banned from like 50 different subs pre-emptively, not because I posted anywhere in particular, but by just being a member of certain other subs. The whole "tolerance" thing gets ripped up the second its no longer useful or comfortable.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 07:38 PM
24

Ya know, I'm sure I'm not alone in being quite tired of the apparent "war between the sexes." It's quite possible a woman might just have a certain opinion on her own, and isn't trying to play games, "get male validation," "chameleon," etc. There is certainly competition in the sexual marketplace, but not every instance of a woman "being based" is her actually trying to compete in that realm.
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 06:00 PM
7

!ShakespeareInsult
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 05:58 PM
6

Spicy.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 08:13 PM
11

"49% of the population commits more than half the crimes!!!" From the same people convinced the only possible explanation that black people and minorities are disproportionately in prison because of racism.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 08:12 PM
58

This sub is meant to highlight women attempting some sort of manipulation or exercise of their social ability/standing in order to get something they want, and being denied that. This is just an article of a piece of shit person who happens to be female. The context is incorrect for the sub.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/12/21 02:23 PM
131

This is the type of shit that enrages me. I'm a dad of two young boys, including a toddler, and I'd rather march willingly into a fucking shredder than see them hurt in these ways. Fuck.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/21 02:46 PM
2

Tell me you don't understand capitalism and economics without telling me you don't understand capitalism and economics.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen18/11/21 08:21 PM
7

This person is closer to a sheep. No one can ultimately take "your rights" away. Only weaklings that aren't willing to defend their rights, or exercise them regardless of law, would ever think this. (I'm willing to bet, however, that she's referring to abortion, and that somehow limiting this in even the slightest way makes the whole country the handmaid's tale).
/r/MensRights02/06/21 06:57 PM
8

I'll take "the same logic racists use when describing their fear of minorities, with an extra dash of bullshit statistics" for $100.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen15/03/21 02:56 PM
8

Well at least she's open and honest. So much for "It's just a fetus, not a human/child/baby! Safe, legal, rare!"
/r/AntiFeminists10/08/20 12:07 PM
2

Just wow. When everything is a freaking power-game, your life must be so empty. Not to also mention that the majority of these people are likely insidious weaklings. They'll let things happen, won't actually take initiative for all these "terrible wrongs men collectively wrought," but they'll just blankly smile and keep their awful thoughts to themselves until they can get to Twitter or Reddit.
/r/MensRights31/03/20 01:18 PM
5

How about this: I think it's dreadfully sad for a person to be so unhappy they want to end it all. Can we just stop the composition fallacy for once, please? Does everything need to be a competition? Or can we just say "people committing suicide is bad. Let's figure out ways to help these people out." To say "well, Group X really isn't unhappier than Group Y, because reasons" is incredibly unfeeling.
/r/AntiFeminists26/03/20 02:29 PM
32

Also, men are expected to show strength, and so "reporting" suicidality is likely lower, while clearly effective suicidality is higher.
/r/AntiFeminists26/03/20 02:26 PM
7

Got banned there for seeing a thread where the solution was to "abolish prisons." When asked what to do with criminals, response was "Reform them. Remove inequality that causes crime in the first place. Create cities for the more violent criminals that refuse to be reformed, etc." My post was: This statement makes an assumption ("inequality causes crime") and proposes abolishing it, without any real means to determine... How to measure inequality. What to do if the perpetrator isn't unequal. So …
/r/FeminismStopsWhen14/02/20 06:28 PM
3

>Implying women never start conflicts. >Implying "men's conflicts" aren't also women's conflicts too.
/r/AntiFeminists08/01/20 06:06 PM
2

You have to be severely down the rabbit hole to try and politicize and weaponize suicide. I happen to just think it's a tragedy either way.
/r/MensRights10/12/19 03:35 PM
3

What is legally true and actually true can, in fact, differ.
/r/AntiFeminists03/12/19 01:41 PM
17

The ultimate irony. Men don't feel entitled to women, otherwise they wouldn't engage in any sort of dating behaviors, they'd basically just immediately jump to sex. Most men don't do that. The woman, hear me out, can say "no." If the man persists, the woman can leave or get some help. If the man attempts rape, the woman can fight and call for help. And who's the most likely party to help her? Who will most likely seek justice for her? Who would be particularly ready to inflict violence on the pe…
/r/MensRights14/11/19 05:03 PM
14

Tell them you actually identify as a woman.
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/19 02:52 PM
3

I mean, anyone can cherrypick a bunch of photos and then use it to strawman half the population... Also, now I know what that sub is... wtf?
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/19 12:52 PM
2

Girls are more likely to go into STEM when they have role models in STEM, as men have had. I'm very torn on this logic, personally. On one hand, sure, it's certainly nice to "see" someone like you doing something amazing. On the other, the first people to do something didn't have any "role models," they just went ahead and tried to do it. If you need a role model to do something, or even more pathetically just to feel good about yourself with minimal effort, I'm not a fan of that.
/r/AntiFeminists21/10/19 07:42 PM
5

Yes, but only about $1.3 million more over 10 years. That's a little over a 3% difference. That's a much different story than what society/the general media's been saying.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 03:11 PM
1

I consider it more fragile to be so happy there's "finally something to mock men" with... and it's just a collection of pixels on a screen.
/r/MensRights07/02/19 02:35 PM
5

Grace.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 03:00 PM
26

Boys playing rough isn't nice. Ban it! Men finding women attractive, particularly ones straight up looking to be found attractive, isn't nice. Ban it! Various stereotypes of men are definitely true and aren't nice. Ban it! Various stereotypes of women are definitely not true and aren't nice. Ban it! Sheesh.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 10:01 PM
86

MUST earn? What if Jill only shows up for half the week? Sheesh.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 07:55 PM
123

Implying women would magically do a better job. Not just equal, but better is what's implied by the statement.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 10:34 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter