TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

152515 Archive

View 3 posts and 111 comments by 152515 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No, it's not. We obviously share some of the same politics, but this is humor. Unlike feminists, we can laugh at this shit.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 10:49 AM
-10

"Studies". Ok then.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 03:07 PM
-3

You're the reason we get accused of misogyny.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 02:56 PM
3

They quoted me without attribution. Nice journalism.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 09:49 PM
-1

Of course I watched the video. Why does strength of a hit have anything to do with this, legally or morally? If I'm being attacked, I fight back. I don't pull punches.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 08:27 PM
-4

She just attacked him. I would also not care about the well-being of someone who attacked me.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 07:09 PM
-6

So he can't hit back if she hits him? What is he supposed to do when she charges at him in an small enclosed space?
/r/MensRights08/09/14 07:08 PM
-3

So he can't hit back if she hits him? What is he supposed to do when she charges at him in an small enclosed space?
/r/MensRights08/09/14 07:08 PM
-6

She hit him first. He backed away and she came at him again. Glad he didn't get in more trouble.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 03:51 PM
3

[citation needed]
/r/MensRights28/07/14 12:36 AM
6

Quite possible most people just disagree with you.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 07:02 PM
4

I was open to the idea of feminism when I entered college. I hadn't thought too much about it, honestly. The women's studies program I did solidified my support for MRA causes, lol. And yes, they called it "women's studies", not "gender studies". And yes, I petitioned the dean to have it changed. No, I was not successful.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 09:25 AM
2

not T = not topical limits explode the topic = if it was topical, it would be a shitty topic.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 12:11 PM
14

Show me the claims you disagree with, and we can talk. Ever think that the lack of respect is directly connected to the academic institution of feminism needing an unchallenged monopoly on gender studies to maintain its legitimacy?
/r/MensRights03/09/13 08:34 PM
9

No reason to make myself a target. Sorry.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 08:31 PM
10

Right, because when my argument elsewhere in this thread is about how MRAs are not accepted in the debate community while feminists are, the most prudent thing I could do would be to tell you who I was.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 08:25 PM
9

You're just showing how much you don't understand the MRM. It's heavily researched and has numerous scholars. It never, ever claims that men have it worse than women. Ever. It's also unabashedly focused on the western world. Most MRAs will tell you that feminism is needed is the developing world. You clearly haven't read much.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 08:22 PM
–

This is relevant to a community that I care deeply about, too. You're opinion of good education isn't more valid than mine.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 08:20 PM
5

K, last question then. If debate is male-dominated in ideology, then why is "feminism" an ok argument and "mens rights" isnt? Shouldn't it be the opposite?
/r/MensRights03/09/13 08:04 PM
–

..... you're totally missing the analogy. In this case, "the US" is the debate community, and "Christians" are feminists / people sympathetic to the feminist argument. Nothing I've said relates to men/women.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 07:56 PM
–

That's such backwards reasoning I don't really know where to begin. A. I could care less about public forum, I do policy. B. Prevalence of the argument doesn't mean it's remotely true. You haven't responded AT ALL to this. C. The fact that you point to the argument's necessity as a given shows the acceptance of the argument. If it weren't accepted, it wouldn't be seen as needed, because its necessity is part of feminist theory. D. Your blind dismissal of MRA claims shows how entrenched you are i…
/r/MensRights03/09/13 07:55 PM
–

Do tell. I'm interested in hearing how men benefit from widespread acceptance of the feminist ideology without even considering it's counterargument.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 07:49 PM
–

No, it's like saying the US is a Christian nation because all the social norms and positions of power are based around Christianity.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 07:48 PM
–

People win with Feminist Ks. Fem IR. Fem ecology. Etc. People don't win with men's rights based arguments. Thus, feminism is an accepted ideology, while its antithesis isn't.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 07:41 PM
–

Really?? Lol. That's just laughable.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 07:30 PM
–

Your informed opinion took you to feminism. Mine took me to men's rights. So did the author of this post. None of that changes the fact that acceptance of an idea in debate doesn't give that idea any legitimacy.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 07:28 PM
–

You think policy debate brings out truth? With politics scenarios devolving into nuclear war, radical nihilistic kritiks, and every other sort of far-fetched idea that only makes sense in the debate format? Please. "feminism" is an argument. There's a counterargument. Just because you refuse to consider it doesn't make it any less valid.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 07:23 PM
–

Except he never mentioned anything about wanting more rights in debate...
/r/MensRights03/09/13 07:13 PM
–

You're in the wrong sub, buddy.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 07:12 PM
1

Racism is wrong.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 06:03 PM
3

Why does this have downvotes?
/r/MensRights11/08/13 05:04 AM
1

Not support. It's a law that explicitly favors one gender. Clearly not "Equality".
/r/MensRights08/08/13 04:59 AM
2

Abortion isn't killing. Pro-life MRA's puzzle me. Logic used on gender issues, but not on that issue...
/r/MensRights22/07/13 10:00 PM
3

But abortion should be legal. And these restrictions are crazy. Good for them.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 06:56 PM
-5

Well, they are equal.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 06:52 PM
24

So what if it's morally equivalent to abortion? Both should be legal.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 01:34 AM
1

But the law does. That's the whole point of this thread...
/r/MensRights07/07/13 04:30 AM
1

So, sexual assault. Got it.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 02:26 AM
1

Exactly. "penis" is not on the list, therefore not rape.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 01:28 AM
5

Men don't have vaginas that someone else could come in contact with....
/r/MensRights07/07/13 01:08 AM
4

What do you think this thread is about... Vaginal sex isn't counted.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 11:27 PM
8

.... Forced sex?
/r/MensRights06/07/13 11:18 PM
15

Not true at all. The most common type of female on male rape is excluded.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 11:13 PM
0

Hey, I was at the event, and these guys had every intention of being sexist. The whole Union has a reputation for it, and they uphold it well. Now, I don't think individual sexism is worthy of institutional punishment, but these guys definitely were "guilty".
/r/MensRights06/06/13 11:58 PM
1

As someone who's worked on multiple democratic campaigns, I can tell you wholeheartedly how wrong you are.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 08:04 PM
-2

If by that you mean that they have nothing to do with each other, then sure.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 06:26 AM
4

.... So? There's no excuse for not wanting more choice in reproductive rights, regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 12:59 PM
3

... what is this even about? I have no idea what you just said.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 12:49 AM
3

Modem medicine lets us fix that problem right up, though. And that should be a right equally extended to men.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 03:45 PM
2

That's not how logic works bro
/r/MensRights20/05/13 03:42 PM
1

This is not constructive at all...
/r/MensRights19/05/13 01:54 PM
3

Thats not what it says, though.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 01:52 PM
2

Can we stop posting this hate site here?
/r/MensRights19/05/13 12:15 AM
1

The system is set up to facilitate the flow of wealth from men to women.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 03:28 AM
1

Already posted here twice...
/r/MensRights18/05/13 03:22 AM
2

Only slightly angry? More feminist talking points with no merit.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 11:29 PM
1

Not a very good one. I'd give it a 3 out of 10 on the troll scale.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 02:02 PM
3

You think unsolicited sexual comments are... Good?
/r/MensRights17/05/13 11:00 AM
0

Unsolicited sexual comments are bad, regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 08:15 AM
2

Don't feed the trolls. You should educate yourself a bit more before subscribing to views like the one presented here
/r/MensRights17/05/13 08:14 AM
2

Don't feed the trolls.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 08:12 AM
62

This really isn't the issue... this is more of a far-off conspiracy theory. There's no reason to think that anyone thinks like this. Additionally, it assumes that a wage gap (and a big one!) is real... which it's not.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 01:20 AM
9

Is it just me, or has there been a huge influx of trolls recently? Clearly, gender stereotypes are bad. But there's nothing inherently bad about a traditional family setup for those who want one.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 01:19 AM
2

This is clearly a troll.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 01:17 AM
2

One literally says acting like a "slut" isn't ok. That's not good, regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 07:15 AM
8

It's definitely a construct that isn't purely along gender lines, they're right. Intersectionality is real. However, the gender division exists, too- females are constructed as more "vulnerable".
/r/MensRights09/05/13 09:00 AM
0

As if age was relevant.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 10:10 PM
1

Then why is it bad that OP is a "faggot"? The sentiment makes no sense unless being a 'faggot" is bad.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 09:31 PM
0

Old enough to recognize an emerging concern troll strangely mixed with ad hominem attacks.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 09:30 PM
0

Ha, ok. I feel perfectly fulfilled. Telling men that they are doomed if they don't change just isn't really in line with MRA ideals.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 09:13 PM
0

You just keep telling me what I need to do. Can you understand why that warrants a negative reaction?
/r/MensRights08/05/13 09:04 PM
0

See, that's a textbook fallacy. There's no reason that a discussion of feelings is hinged on a comfort with masculinity. I can be comfortable with my masculinity and still not want to discuss feelings.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 08:53 PM
0

You don't know that. You don't know what I (or anyone else) wants. Don't pretend to. Telling people how to live is a hallmark of feminism.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 08:46 PM
1

Seriously, I'm not the one with the name calling and pervasive swearing. And I'm the child? Ha. Regardless, you're just repeating the same things. No, I don't agree with the video. It prescribes what men should be. That's bad. I, for one, don't want to be "open and emotional", and I'm also not depressed and self-loathing. You simply don't get to tell men how they should act. Neither does the guy in the video.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 08:45 PM
0

Why do you get to define what is means to be a person? What if I want to be traditional? hegemonic constructs are bad, even when you're the one making them.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 08:40 PM
0

Once again, why is that a better/ more true understanding of "person"?
/r/MensRights08/05/13 08:39 PM
1

Though I agree with the general sentiment, casual homophobia with terms that are almost always used to degrade gay men isn't the best thing to be doing in this sub.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 08:35 PM
0

Seriously, why aren't men "people" now? Why do traditionally feminine traits have a monopoly on what a full person is?
/r/MensRights08/05/13 08:31 PM
0

You just keep demonstrating why your opinions aren't liked here. Personal attacks won't win you any supporters. Also, I don't believe any of that? The construct of masculinity that paints men as sex-obsessed "alphas" is really harmful. However, so is a hegemonic definition of what it means to "be a man" - why should traditional masculine traits be abandoned? What if I want to be the "strong and silent" type?
/r/MensRights08/05/13 08:26 PM
0

I'll let the vote counts speak for themselves. You're clearly a minority opinion.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 08:07 PM
-2

You clearly haven't been around this sub long- this is really anti-male, as are most of these TedX talks.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 07:42 PM
0

You're sure into a lot of anti-male things for being an MRA.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 07:40 PM
2

"this blog supports the traditional family". Lol no, have fun with the downvotes.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 11:27 PM
-5

Why? This forum is for discussion, not your personal polls.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 07:36 PM
1

That's really not what the article says. It's more of a forced choice between Title IX and athletic stipends. Nothing about a detriment.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 09:12 PM
5

Right, post what I just said. Abortion exists, Adoption exists, Child support exists. Unless those are not true, the graphic is true.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 08:27 PM
6

Unless she contends that 1. Abortion is illegal, 2. Adoption doesn't exist, 3. Child support doesn't exist, and 4. the "best interests of the child" legal doctrine doesn't exist, I don't understand. What's her source?
/r/MensRights08/04/13 08:23 PM
1

Sources for what? All you posted was the graphic, that really shouldn't need sources.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 08:17 PM
39

Somewhat accurate, but I'd prefer this sub focus on substantial argument rather than over-generalization.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 08:04 PM
77

They don't like to be wrong, ever. Preemptive bans!
/r/MensRights02/04/13 05:57 PM
0

I'm certainly not new here. That's a common argument, and a true one. You can't just assert that it's not. Also, relevance?
/r/MensRights26/03/13 06:20 PM
7

That's just not true at all. It explicitly rejects the idea that they were "asking for it". You can't just repeat that to make it true. No one is asking for it, not even the rich guy with money hanging out. That doesn't mean there's a rape culture, nor does it mean that people shouldn't change their behavior.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 05:30 PM
8

And what's wrong with that analogy? It's not a losing argument. The point isn't that victims deserved it, it's that they should be actively trying to avoid bad situations, as we all should
/r/MensRights26/03/13 05:19 PM
18

I haven't seen any MRA ever claim that victim's behavior justified rape. Ever.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 05:11 PM
0

This has no place here.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 10:39 PM
1

Its something like 85% of cases that end up with mothers getting primary custody. That's certainly a default.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 08:54 AM
2

It probably is. The point is the one you're making, that "rape culture", if it exists at all, is not one-directional.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 04:16 AM
37

Violence against WOMEN act, even though domestic violence is about a 50-50 split. Legal inequality pushed for by feminists.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 10:11 PM
41

Going to elaborate, or just take your down votes and move on?
/r/MensRights31/01/13 09:19 PM
1

Where did massacres come from? How is that remotely relevant?
/r/MensRights03/01/13 07:08 AM
4

Congress is a fantastic example. Do tell, why don't women have 50% of the seats? Oh that's right, because they didn't win the elections. No discrimination, no arbitrary forces keeping them down, They just didn't win. Corporations as well are easily explained. Men don't take maternity leave, men ask for raises and promotions more often, men are more likely to go into those careers, and men have a high standard deviation ability-wise. I'm glad you could give your opinion, but not allowing opinions…
/r/MensRights03/01/13 07:04 AM
16

I never walk into a meeting and fear that people will judge what I say based on my gender, You've clearly never had a female boss. Homelessness and incarceration are awful, but being unable to feed your family on a shoe string budget might be just as bad. Patently false. whereas smart, skilled and qualified women have more hoops to jump through to become the elite of the elite. Like many feminist arguments, your previous statements in no way support this conclusion.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 03:06 AM
3

So it's awful to demonize Daniel Tosh for rape jokes but this is A-ok. Got it.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 12:42 AM
1

You sound exactly like the woman who yelled "rape jokes ate never funny" at Daniel Tosh. We can't take that stance
/r/MensRights19/10/12 11:32 PM
-4

Ok, this needs to be the difference between us and the majority of feminists. Yes, this is insensitive and reinforces the normalcy of circumcision. But more importantly, it's funny. We can laugh at it. We don't have to oppose humor because we don't agree with it. Nothing is off limits for jokes, even issues we care about. If we can joke about things like "privilege" (which they consider important) then it's ok to joke about this. Not a big deal.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 10:35 PM
9

Very, very liberal.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 01:21 AM
6

No.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 06:54 PM
4

The sun frowning makes it.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 10:15 PM
0

I only see one problem here, and that's with the "false rape accusations don't happen often, believe the victim". But that is understandable, and one of the hardest attitudes to change/ should be lower on the priority list. They do get a lot right, though. “Eighty percent of sexual assault cases are committed by someone the victim knows,” Yates said. “That number jumps to over 90 percent on college campuses.” “One in 10 men will be involved in sexual assault in their lifetime,” Bruns said. “1 in…
/r/MensRights09/07/12 10:25 PM
8

Can I ask why you would disagree?
/r/MensRights02/07/12 06:55 AM
8

The general attitude is that if a man requests an abortion or adoption, he should no longer have parent responsibilities if those requests are ignored.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 06:44 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter