TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

16sapphireguys Archive

View 1 posts and 157 comments by 16sapphireguys on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

16sapphireguys/r/MensRights18/05/16 07:17 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Well as someone who used to be a feminist, and is now closer to being an MRA (I actually don't call myself that because I've realised I don't like ideologies, but I digress...) I don't really see much compatibility. Sure on the surface it seems like the aim is the same; gender equality. However, there's a lot of debate around what those inequalities are, so here you won't find much sympathy if you talk about the gender wage gap, whereas if you hop on over to r/feminism (assuming you haven't alre…
/r/MensRights24/12/16 02:05 AM
14

Because if you don't align yourself with feminism then you deserve a bad rep? Look, feminism is but one set of ideologies, and people can poke fun at those ideologies if they want. It's hardly definitive of what a subreddit is about. Some people here also support feminism, and many dislike it or have no interest in it, but there are plenty here who actually genuinely believe that feminism is detrimental to the MRM (and they have a pretty good case if you ask me), so just chill. Horses for course…
/r/MensRights24/12/16 01:27 AM
2

It mostly just pisses me off that he deleted his comments. I don't mind arguing with an idiot in cases like this, because often times lurkers who haven't formulated an opinion on the subject are swayed by the argument...but when people delete it's harder to follow.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 01:07 AM
1

Point me to where I made the claim and I'll own it, but you can't.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 07:51 PM
2

You can do it without gendered words, full stop. Other languages do. Wow, I didn't realise saying "full stop" constituted an argument nowadays. Bravo. And at no point have I said that one can't do it without gendered pronouns. Literally nowhere have I said it. What I have said is that it strongly aids clarity of communication. Just like we can communicate without a plural version of you, yet most of us opt for it because it aids clarity. You provide actually a perfect example. Telling a story ab…
/r/MensRights13/12/16 07:41 PM
2

Fascistly Oh dear. Maybe you should take that 'word' up with Noah Webster. There were plenty of words that Noah Webster tried to change, and they simply never caught on with the public.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 07:35 PM
3

Yes. Because as I said in a previous comment, other languages have evolved in ways that they don't necessarily need to rely on the pronouns to communicate clearly and concisely. And as I mentioned before english is not one of those languages. It has evolved in a way that we rely heavily upon gendered pronouns to communicate effectively. Going back to the Italian example I gave before, these sentences do not require pronouns; È andato al cinema perché si sentiva malinconico. He went to the cinema…
/r/MensRights13/12/16 07:21 PM
5

This debate's about to get super interesting... Yes I was. Given that he/she are English words is really the biggest giveaway. Given that we're talking about modifications to one specific language, the English language, would be another.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 06:23 PM
5

Where did I say that? No where. And I wasn't talking about languages with no gender pronouns, I was talking about English. Other languages have developed their own methods of communication which doesn't require the pronouns to communicate these things, English is not one of those languages. Take Italian, in which subject pronouns (he/she/it) are often omitted from sentences, they get round this by changing the verbs and adjectives associated with that subject, and denote its gender.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 06:09 PM
3

Did you actually just compare the words he/she to the word nigger? Well that's fucking idiotic. The thing is, for most people in the world, pronouns are not political. They're just words which help us communicate more efficiently and clearly. And of course language evolves. The key word here being evolves, but this isn't evolution, it's forced changes.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 06:03 PM
69

For anyone interested, this is actually untrue. Here's an article in which it's reported that the Union denies ever saying it. I'm a bit disappointed in what Peter Tatchell said though; “It is a positive thing to not always emphasise gender divisions and barriers. Differentiation based on gender is often unnecessary. We are all human." Often unnecessary? You're an activist, mate. You're not a sociologist or a linguist or a philosopher...don't tell us what we should deem necessary. Can you imagin…
/r/MensRights13/12/16 03:28 PM
3

liberal media Have you ever heard of The Daily Mail before? The DM is very much a conservative, right-wing tabloid, despised by just about every liberal that existed.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 03:49 PM
1

Did you tell me not to call you bro?
/r/MensRights07/12/16 07:58 PM
1

Learn how to formulate a response, bro!
/r/MensRights07/12/16 07:02 PM
1

Please quote the part where I wholesale agreed with that. Or did you just read the first line and then decide to get offended?
/r/MensRights07/12/16 06:55 PM
2

The problem is once again men are being encouraged to try something not for their own sake and possible pleasure but rather they sre encouraged to try it based entirely around women. To me that isn't "the problem". Rather I see the problem as being that the onus is solely on men to do that and almost never on women. We would go a lot further if we put effort into understanding others experiences. As such, the solution as I see it, is not to say "no we don't want to experience other things to bet…
/r/MensRights07/12/16 06:21 PM
1

Great argument, bro!
/r/MensRights07/12/16 06:17 PM
-7

I actually don't think this is a ridiculous statement, and don't really see what it has to do with "men's rights", but here goes. This article is intentionally putting a bad spin on it by saying "men should be penetrated by another man" because that's not what he said. Although it might be what he's inferring when he says "It's skin" and "do it with a friend". If it is what he's inferring then that's dumb. Don't have sex with anyone you don't want to. However I think there's something to be said…
/r/MensRights07/12/16 10:48 AM
1

You're a fucking idiot. The words 'objective' and 'subjective' do not belong to science, nor are they defined by scientists. Richard Feynman explained how your view is ignorance So you're relying on the subjective opinion of someone to prove that my view is ignorance? Seems like a bit of a contradiction, no? Go troll elsewhere dipshit.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 03:58 PM
1

You're confused. It's purely subjective how you even count "GDP." No. No, it's not. It's based on real facts and figures, and there are standard of how we do it, what things can be included. Yes, there's debate around which method and technique is best, but it's not based on personal feelings and opinions. By your own quoted definition, it does not exist only in the mind..it is the object of thought. Beyond that, last years calculations don't exist only in the mind. They're real. They actually h…
/r/MensRights10/11/16 03:39 PM
1

economics for example, requires a deep understanding of the complex financial processes which take place on a global scale, it requires a knowledge of GDP and the surrounding calculations, how growth and inflation work, how we value products No, it's not. The calculations made and formulae used in 2015 to establish the GDP of all the different countries is not something which belongs to "the thinking subject", they are "the object of thought". Likewise with the goods that countries trade, likewi…
/r/MensRights10/11/16 03:08 PM
1

They are not 100% subjective at all, economics for example, requires a deep understanding of the complex financial processes which take place on a global scale, it requires a knowledge of GDP and the surrounding calculations, how growth and inflation work, how we value products etc. These are not subjective matters, they're rooted in what is actually happening around us. Asserting that they're 100% subjective is just factually incorrect. Don't lie. The people who are not allowed (eg if they stud…
/r/MensRights10/11/16 02:33 PM
2

I do mean those things, although a simple language exam/certificate is a good idea. (eg if you were hiring a translator.) So I wonder where you stand on subjects such as economics, history, politics, sociology etc. which, whilst all based on evidence, require an enormous amount of subjectivity which is why there's such polarised debate around these things? It's irrational to say someone is superior because they obediently regurgitated the ruling class's subjective opinions on philosophy, religio…
/r/MensRights10/11/16 01:40 PM
2

There shouldn't even be college degrees for the subjective opinion fields. I'm going to assume here that you don't mean things like philosophy, literature, languages and theology etc. and assume that you mean the arts such as dance, fine art, music etc. I don't agree there shouldn't be degrees for these thing; Conservetoires have been around for a long time teaching musicians how to perfect their craft, and are arguably the reasons why we have had such talented composers and musicians as Rachman…
/r/MensRights10/11/16 09:54 AM
13

Naomi Wolf was on BBC Radio 4 this morning, and she was brought on as a "feminist activist", and as much as I really dislike that women, she actually was quite good. The presenter asked if the election outcome was because "America is not ready for a female president" and she basically said no, the outcome had nothing to do with the gender of the candidates, people are much more concerned with things like household income etc. She was actually, and I can't believe I'm going to say this, surprisin…
/r/MensRights10/11/16 09:01 AM
34

But it violates muh human rights to live in a world where this movie isn't being shown! /s
/r/MensRights09/11/16 05:46 PM
21

What components of feminism do you think are worth keeping?
/r/MensRights09/11/16 05:44 PM
110

Speaking as someone who was a feminist for my entire adult life, I don't think that's really possible. I don't like "hateful" rhetoric about anything, and don't support it. But if feminism is going to continue to diminish and silence the MRM, and blame men for all the worlds problems...then I think it's necessary that the MRM continues to criticise it.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 04:19 PM
3

They're doubling down instead. That is, I suspect, what will happen. Fingers crossed that's just butt-hurt immediate reactions, and upon reflection they'll change. I know that's entirely wishful thinking, but I think it's time the left started looking more towards people like Sam Harris.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 02:04 PM
435

“By not labeling myself a feminist anymore in no way shape or form says I’m anti-women’s rights. Why I chose to drop the label is because, after making this film, I don’t view feminism as the road to gender equality. That’s largely because of the way that men’s issues are addressed within feminism. I don’t think it’s conducive to an environment to discuss gender issues and ultimately solutions if men are being demonized.” Preach, Cassie! I genuinely cannot wait to see this movie; twice I've emai…
/r/MensRights09/11/16 01:25 PM
16

Now is a great time for public activism- people clearly agree with us What? I'm not based in the US, however I don't think I've ever once heard Trump talking about men's issues, nor do I think his supporters are talking about them. Issues such as immigration, religious extremism, gun-control and fiscal policy seem to be on their tongues much more than men's issues? Don't get me wrong, I think Trump is better for the MRM than Hillary would have been, however, at best the republican attitude could…
/r/MensRights09/11/16 11:57 AM
0

Who knows bro, but you kinda have to go on what people say, and it seems that they define that difference by gender.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 03:22 PM
1

Yeah... running with my gut next to a hot girl makes me insecure. I'll be the first to admit it. Well I guess I was wrong, maybe there is a market for it. It also makes me worried about where I'm allowed to look and for how long. Uh, what? Assume that if anyone catches you looking at anything other than their face, then it would be weird. I mean, check them out by all means, but don't get caught, and dont glare. It's normal social intereaction.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 02:21 PM
3

That's the point I made.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 11:17 PM
7

I would add the caveat that if women only gyms are ok, so should men only gyms. I feel there is a double standard here though. I mean, I'm not defending it because I'm sure we would all hear the shrill feminist outcry if a men-only gym were to open, but there isn't generally the need for a men's only gym, I don't think? I regularly hear women complaining about men at the gym and how it intimidates them or makes them feel insecure, whereas I never hear the same said by men about women. Just an ob…
/r/MensRights06/11/16 09:14 PM
1

wtf?
/r/MensRights05/11/16 06:25 PM
8

This is a big win! For anyone who is interested, here is the debate last year. There are some great points made, and there are also some fucking idiotic point; like when Philip Davies is talking about how women are advantaged in the family courts and he is interrupted by an MP to tell him that it's misogynistic. EDIT: Also, here's the video in which Jess Philips, a vile misandric female MP, laughed at the idea of a debate about men's rights taking place. Watching this video actually fills me wit…
/r/MensRights03/11/16 06:22 PM
3

Every time I hear that, I'm gob-smacked. Here each child now gives the parents as much as 9 months paid mat leave, and they're entitled to another 3 months on top of that. Plus, most organisations here have policies whereby they will top the statutory pay up so that they still receive a larger portion of their wage.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 09:55 PM
1

Unfortunately I couldn't tell you the logistics of it, however I imagine that it would require official documentation from the workplace of the mother which would either go to the HMRC (Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs, which is the official government department that deals with taxation and statutory pay etc) and then be passed to the other parents place of work, or they simply take it in themselves. Now that I think about it, it's probably both. The whole thing is quite complex, but people ar…
/r/MensRights31/10/16 09:52 PM
20

I'm not sure if you're trolling or just unfamiliar with this subreddit; but we don't really use terms like patriarchy around these parts. The idea that this is "patriarchy" and not just a natural consequence of how our society has developed seems laughable to a lot of people here. Besides which, there are no objective ways to take down the patriarchy, it's a fruitless pursuit.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 04:21 PM
7

I think there are maybe some inaccuracies in your comment; Many of them aren't even qualified To be accepted as a teacher in the UK you mustregister with the General Teaching Council/Department of Education. As such, anyone working as a teacher must hold a specified qualification. There are however some auxilliary positions, such as support for learning, classroom assistant etc. which aren't subject to the same stringent qualification requirements. There are far too many female teachers in the U…
/r/MensRights31/10/16 02:38 PM
0

Could I win? Unlikely. I might win the battle, but I won't win the war. On the contrary. I completely respect your decision to keep your head down and just avoid the issue altogether (I'd probably do the same) but I think the opposite would happen here; you might lose the individual "battle", especially if it's just appealing to the opinions of other people in your class, but I think the "war" can only be one in the sense of people in universities everywhere just making the challenge. The challe…
/r/MensRights31/10/16 02:22 PM
1

I don't really see it as disability rights. I don't think it's clear that he is physically disabled? As someone who works in diabilities, that's actually one of the biggest issues that rights-organisations are facing. There has been a lot of awareness-raising campaigns about "invisible disabilities", so I think they're still largely taking that under their wing. Besides which, I don't think the article explicitly mentions that it was a woman who came on with the stroller?
/r/MensRights31/10/16 10:32 AM
638

I love the fact that this is happening in high schools. What I especially loved was when a kid nearby jokingly uttered "triggered." It gave me a bit of hope that maybe these kids are seeing through the bullshit. In fairness to the teacher, I was expecting her to be much more heavy handed in her response (based on your title), but I don't think she was doing much more than playing devil's advocate. For example, she asked him about whether he thinks it's fair that men only get 2 weeks paternity le…
/r/MensRights31/10/16 10:26 AM
1

Isn't this more about disability rights than men's rights? I mean, one could argue that perhaps the driver wouldn't have asked a female with disabilities to get off the bus, but that would 100% be conjecture and doesn't really warrant much of a discussion? Plus, the second that MRAs start calling themselves "intersectional", I'm outta here!
/r/MensRights31/10/16 10:11 AM
1

How does it work with the whole Tugg thing? I'd really love a screening in Glasgow, but I don't really have much time for organising it at the moment. I emailed the local film theatre, but they haven't gotten back to me yet!
/r/MensRights30/10/16 11:57 PM
1

Intersectionality started with black feminism...
/r/MensRights30/10/16 10:01 PM
1

2 supporters! 😂😂😂😂
/r/MensRights30/10/16 03:39 PM
2

For anyone interested, I sent an email of complaint to Palace Cinemas. Here's what I wrote... Dear Sir/Madam I'm writing this email as I've recently been made aware that you have bowed to feminist pressure and cancelled your screening of Cassie Jaye's 'The Red Pill' documentary. I am deeply disappointed in your organisation. I have looked at the Change.org petition which, as I understand, was the impetus for the cancellation, and have seen that the vast majority of commenter seem all to happy to…
/r/MensRights27/10/16 01:20 PM
3

Here's a copy of the email that I sent to them... Dear Sir/Madam I'm writing this email as I've recently been made aware that you have bowed to feminist pressure and cancelled your screening of Cassie Jaye's 'The Red Pill' documentary. I am deeply disappointed in your organisation. I have looked at the Change.org petition which, as I understand, was the impetus for the cancellation, and have seen that the vast majority of commenter seem all to happy to be spreading misconceptions and untruths ab…
/r/MensRights27/10/16 12:50 PM
30

As someone who used to be the person who would blame patriarchy for all of this, all I can say is that a whole lifetime of being told that women are oppressed, without question, without ever hearing anyone argue against it, by being told that the very act of questioning it is misogynistic in and of itself...it's so impossible to be convinced otherwise. It really does flip the whole world on it's head. Feminism actually kind of ruined my late teens and early 20's. Feel so much happier to have she…
/r/MensRights17/10/16 09:35 PM
31

I was at the pub once with friends and said this to one of them, and she actually did blame it on the patriarchy. I kid you not. It basically summed up the whole of feminism for me; women can do horrible 'sexist' things, they blame it on patriarchy, and somehow it's men's fault again.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 09:16 PM
3

It lives because women like it. Women and many men, unfortunately. Whilst at least half of the population thinks that they're discriminated against in this way, politicians such as Barack Obama and Justin Trudeau will continue to perpetuate the myth because it allows them to appear to be on the side of feminists without ever actually having to do anything. Also, male liberals (of which I used to be one) love to virtue-signal by being outraged at the gender wage gap and anyone who denies its exis…
/r/MensRights17/10/16 09:39 AM
1

I don't care if you're a man or not, or autistic or not. Waving your hand in someone's face is a good way to get them pissed off at you. You might not care if someone is autistic or not...that's fine, and entirely your opinion, but it has absolutely no bearing on the capacity of an autistic person to understand that waving their hand in someone's face might cause a negative reaction.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 01:03 PM
1

You insist that this is about some kind of know it all attitude but all I'm getting is that you might have a semi-latent inferiority complex. Of course. You're a "radical feminist"; you're incapable of reflecting on your own words/actions, even when they're read back to you. But yeah, I just want to clear up that the gender roles that the patriarchy forces on men are oppressive and help create the milieu under which aggressive communication is acceptable or even seen as a way of asserting domina…
/r/MensRights09/10/16 05:21 AM
1

When the truth is objective and based on facts but you chose to treat it like a subjective opinion there is a problem. Oh dear. Facts like the gender wage gap you mean? Those kind of "facts"? Once again, you assume that you've done some level of research that I haven't. Your entire stance is founded on the belief that you have knowledge that other don't, that you have a clarity of understand which we don't possess, that you've done research where we have not. When you take that attitude, of cour…
/r/MensRights08/10/16 01:20 PM
2

It's futile to try to force someone into accepting anything they don't want to accept. This is what is wrong with your attitude. Why do you see it as something you have to make other people accept? Your view is dogmatic. It assumes that you are the only one who is correct, and anyone else who disagrees is just "refusing to accept" the truth. I'm not here to force you to accept my views, I'm just here to share my opinions and if anyone finds truth in them, they may share in them. Falling back on …
/r/MensRights08/10/16 11:30 AM
2

Actually, I was a feminist for the biggest part of my adult life and know perfectly well what these things mean. I just don't agree with them as concepts and how they are used. You want to advocate for men like Cameron? You're free to do that. But why not advocate for the many, many women who are harassed online as well? Why not just acknowledge the fact that women are affected by these things? It seems funny that you aren't saying this to the feminists who ramble on about how harassed women are…
/r/MensRights08/10/16 10:26 AM
1

Tbh, I don't know why you're here, when you obviously haven't educated yourself on the issues MRA's talk about. You're using terms like "patriarchy" and "toxic masculinity" which is a bit like going to an atheist group, talking about the Eucharist or the Pentecost and expecting people to take you seriously. No, because you can't expect feminists to shun what happened to Cameron while largely disregarding feminist critiques/concerns. I see. So are you saying that if I join feminism they will star…
/r/MensRights08/10/16 08:41 AM
1

I'm not saying that its OK to disregard Cameron being insulted but at the same time, you need to accept that feminism is valid. Why do I need to accept that? In this instance, it's talking points are completely invalid, and rendered thus by the stats. Men receive more abuse on line, women are just as likely to abuse other women with gendered insults etc. But then again here you are, primarily preoccupied with discussing how females oppress you. I have never ever once said that females oppress me…
/r/MensRights07/10/16 05:02 AM
1

For example, men who have experienced issues in divorce courts or with child custody aren't sitting seething about "the patriarchy".
/r/MensRights07/10/16 04:53 AM
5

She addresses this in the movie though (according to what she said in her AMA). She said that The Red Pill was what seemed the most obvious choice given that we sometimes liken someone who joins the MRM as someone who has just taken the blue pill. And it is an apt expression; as someone who was once a hardcore feminist, those few weeks in which my mind suddenly opened to mens rights issues were actually pretty turbulent (mentally speaking). I felt very much as if I'd tumbled down the rabbit hole…
/r/MensRights05/10/16 01:47 PM
6

Please see my other comment on this thread. No, I'm not serious about the use of the phrase "patriarchy hurts men" because it means very little at this point, due to the shifty definition of the word "patriarchy". From my perspective, most of the men who experience the issues we regularly discuss on this subreddit don't place the blame on patriarchy and/or other men.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 01:38 PM
9

I think "patriarchy hurts men" is a bit of a meaningless statement at this point. Not because there might not be truth in it, but no one really has an agreed definition of what "patriarchy" is, and I never really see any tangible evidence that it "hurts men". I know some people who define patriarchy as a society which largely has male political and business leaders. I know people who define patriarchy as the gender roles/norms that each of the sexes live up to. Some people just go more vague and…
/r/MensRights05/10/16 01:30 PM
9

I actually had a discussion about this on Facebook recently, and it was after a political debate here which was shown on TV. My friend commented on the large amounts of tweets calling the female participants "gendered insults" such as cunt, bitch, cow etc. His grievance was that he didn't want his neice ever seeing insults like that and thinking the internet/politics wasn't a safe place for her. Enter the old feminist talking point about how "an assertive man is called a boss but an assertive wo…
/r/MensRights05/10/16 12:46 PM
2

What makes you doubt it'll be a good thing for the cause? To me the trailer looked pretty interesting, and having watched several interview with Cassie Jaye and reading her AMA, it seems as if she's fairly on side and has really attempted to remain neutral, so I'm keen to hear what you think the reaction will be?
/r/MensRights05/10/16 12:10 PM
75

The things is, it's basically the same number but with a different extention. You just know that it's the same feminist department who think they're doing their bit to help men...because patriarchy hurts men too...didn't you know? /s
/r/MensRights05/10/16 10:49 AM
115

It's now! It's the present year!! Moral panic!!
/r/MensRights30/07/16 01:26 PM
1

Yeah I'll need to see pics as proof... 😜
/r/MensRights27/07/16 05:38 AM
0

Definitely not a myth. I know guys who can do it, plus you can see videos of it online.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 05:19 AM
3

He can be such a cretin at times. But please, let me assuage your fears; he referenced one survey done by adamandeve.com, so I looked that think tank up. Turns out it's not a think tank, but an American based sex store (much science, indeed). Well of course Americans are likely to prefer one over the other; it's the norm there! And the other survey was conducted in Iowa. IOWA!! So again, same bias. I just had a quick glance around internet dot com and couldn't find a European study. I'd say here…
/r/MensRights26/07/16 09:58 PM
1

I'm in Europe, and tbh I don't personally have a preference either way in terms of aesthetics. Whenever I've been in the US I've noticed that a lot of gay guys get really turned on by the novelty of uncut dicks. It's not quite a "fetish" but in the same vein as liking beards or body hair etc. So I don't think there is anything objective about it. I'm not disagreeing with you, but do you have a link where Milo actually makes that argument? I mean, I can believe he'd prefer cut cocks, but I find i…
/r/MensRights26/07/16 09:25 PM
1

Well I think the other poster meant external stimulation.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 07:54 PM
2

Surely by that definition anything which makes the penis erect is therefore stimulating the glans?
/r/MensRights26/07/16 07:49 PM
1

I honestly find it quite sad that guys think of their dicks that way. I love dicks, and think they're very sexy!
/r/MensRights26/07/16 07:42 PM
1

I'm not getting involved in any argument, but glans stimulation is not essential to achieve orgasm. The proof of this is in the fact that many guys can cum hands free, especially if there is anal stimulation.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 07:41 PM
1

Maybe you should do an experiment. Go to your local gay bar, get your dick out, and see how many guys there would be more than happy to show it some love! Haha
/r/MensRights26/07/16 07:10 PM
1

Ahaha thanks! I wasn't meaning it as a joke though, I genuinely think dicks look lovely, and it would be a complete shame if any guy looks at his dick that way!
/r/MensRights26/07/16 06:53 PM
6

it doesnt look great whether original or mutilated. As a gay guy, I have to object to this. Your dicks are awesome, guys! Don't let chicks tell you otherwise.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 01:12 PM
1

I understand your concerns in this regard. Especially owing to the context, it does seem like this could be the result of ideological parenting. However, given that gender-dysphoria is a real condition that people experience, surely you agree that there's an argument for diagnosis, and potentially treatment, as early as possible? If a child/adoloscent/young adult suffered any other psychological or neurological condition, such a depression, anxiety, a personality disorder etc. then we'd probably…
/r/MensRights25/07/16 12:59 PM
1

You have a fundamental misunderstanding of the people here, it seems to me. I actually agree with you, and I think a lot of people here are perhaps a bit misinformed. However, there is a healthy concern to be found in their protestations; children are very susceptible to influence and suggestion, and they think this might be the result of an ideological parenting style. However, given that gender-dysphoria is a neurological condition, I think cases like this simply highlight the importance of ad…
/r/MensRights25/07/16 12:12 PM
1

I don't think anyone has argued that a child should be able to make that choice. Most arguments I hear, and what I believe myself, is that no child should be genitally mutilated, but if they choose circumcision when they reach adulthood then that is their choice.
/r/MensRights25/07/16 11:06 AM
1

Just to maybe help satisfy your curiosity, I think a lot of female pro and semi-pro gymnasts don't start puberty until well into their teens. There are various physiological reasons for this, such as very very low body fat percentage etc.
/r/MensRights25/07/16 11:03 AM
11

Oh god. I swear I don't think I've ever read an Everyday-Feminism article which doesn't mention the fucking wage gap! In addition, women make less money than men and therefore are often less likely to be able to finance their relationships themselves. Maybe if you hadn't done a degree in Gender Studies then you'd be able to pay for your meal rather than relying on men to do it?
/r/MensRights21/07/16 11:57 AM
3

I wasn't making an argument either way. I was merely pointing out that this study is inadequate in providing us with a full understanding of the situation at hand. I'm not quite sure what you mean by "getting children away from a demographic" means? If the suggestions is that we remove all children from a particular demographic, then no. I don't really think any data would justify that. Plus I think that would be against various articles of the UN convention on the rights of the child. What it c…
/r/MensRights12/07/16 03:30 PM
3

Let's not jump to this guys defense too quickly. 4 - 8 children died in his house and he knew about it...it sounds like he was completely complicit in it and deserves to be charged. I think it's too cut and dry to say that he had no option. If he was against this then he should've contacted the police and social services. He should've left his wife, and sought justice through the courts. I understand things aren't stacked in our favour as men, but I don't think it's quite accurate to say that he…
/r/MensRights12/07/16 02:34 PM
5

Regardless of marital status it is clear that more women (than men) are guilty of killing their children. Certainly in terms of actual numbers, but the picture might look slightly different if it were done in terms of percentage of mothers vs. percentage of fathers. I also think it would be important to include household income in the data analysis. I suspect that there could be a strong link between relative poverty and murder of children. If that were the case, then you'd probably have to fact…
/r/MensRights12/07/16 12:13 PM
3

This is an interesting article, however I think the statistical analysis could've been much richer had they factored in data about single-parent families. The reason I say this is because there's a significantly higher percentage of single-mother families than single-father families, ergo, more women are mothers than men are fathers, which would naturally skew the figures. I'm at work at the moment so I cannot really delve into finding the figures, but muh wikipedia says the following; The resul…
/r/MensRights12/07/16 09:46 AM
3

I'm actually with you on this. Men do commit a significantly higher proportion of violent crime, and the figure above is reflective of that. I also don't necessarily think it has to do with being shown more "care and compassion" (although that may be a small factor). I think it's just that male brains have a greater propensity for violence. This is quite off topic but where I find these figures really relevant is in terms of the Black Lives Matter argument.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 09:03 AM
2

If you wish to know why the MRM doesn't form some alliance with feminism, then there are plenty of resources out there already talking about it. People like Karen Straughan, Paul Elam, Theryn Meyer etc. have all responded to the question of why they don't think the MRM isn't really compatible with feminism, and why a lot of MRMs are anti-feminist. I mean this in the friendliest way possible; you should go and do your homework on this issue and come and discuss it once you've done that.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 10:49 AM
1

Sorry, I think your last statement is shitty. The contraception argument only really works if you ignore the fact that guys also seem ready and willing to have sex without making sure the necessary precautions are in place. It takes two to tango. The law is shitty and needs changed, and there are plenty of individual women who take advantage of it. They are assholes. But let's not tar all women with that brush. And just for the record, I'm all for "killing unborn babies". I actually think the go…
/r/MensRights26/06/16 11:04 PM
1

Just to correct you, the WBC aren't dangerous. They're non-violent and, to the best of my knowledge, they always operate within the law. You could argue that their ideas are dangerous to society, but I think their ideas are too radical to be dangerous. Even conservative Christians look at them and sort of shift in their seats because they don't want to be associated.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 10:56 PM
1

We all know that the gender pay gap is bullshit. But I can't really blame feminists for believing in it; when mainstream news publications reference it so often, when media presenter offer it up, when actual shitty textbooks cite it as fact, hell, when Barack Obama and co spout it as gospel...it's hard not to assume it must be true. Again, I'm not saying that her project and it's aims are good. I think they're shit. But I think it's worth remembering that she probably does just think that what s…
/r/MensRights26/06/16 10:47 PM
1

How do you mean?
/r/MensRights26/06/16 09:26 PM
6

As a gay man, I actually have a bit of a soft spot for the Westboro Baptist Church, and I'll tell you why. 1) The WBC is a completely non-violent organisation. To my knowledge, they have never been involved in, or incited violence in any way. They exemplify what free speech is about. 2) They expose Christianity for what it is. Even though most Christians don't believe what they believe, The Bible undeniably contains a shit ton of homophobic bullshit. It's just that the WBC actually has the balls…
/r/MensRights26/06/16 09:14 PM
22

I have since left teaching, but I completely agree with you. I know they have scholarship programs and gender quotas for STEM subjects, and I'm kinda against that on the grounds that people should do what they want and no one should get preferential treatment to enter these fields. As such, I'm torn on whether or not they should do it for early years education. On one hand, men probably just aren't that interested in going on to work with kids. On the other hand, I think we genuinely need more m…
/r/MensRights26/06/16 05:47 PM
62

As someone who trained as a teacher and who worked in a school, I can confirm this. Just for some background, I was 24 at the time, working in a unit for kids with additional needs. There were 12 kids in this unit, and at various times there were 6-7 members of staff (the kids had particularly complex needs). I was the only male. All sorts of crazy things were said during that time. For instance, there was a lot of talk about child abusers (apparently one of the other teachers worked with a guy …
/r/MensRights26/06/16 05:27 PM
1

This is entry-level trolling. Nice try.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 01:08 PM
1

Men don't need to get better as we are already superior. That's what's misogynistic about it. And I'm sorry for the low blow, but if you want a debate about "misogisy" then learn how to spell it first. The reason that there's nothing untrue or incorrect in your post is because you made no claims based on objective fact. You just spewed your (misogynistic!) bullshit opinion, which by definition cannot be untrue. If it's shitty for Michelle Obama to say it, then it's shitty for you to say it.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 12:50 PM
2

Fuck off, and take this misogynistic bullshit back on over to r/theredpill.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 12:28 PM
11

I know it's infuriating when people like Emma Watson spout bullshit like this, but I think there's something she said which is quite important to bear in mind. "it won't stop me from doing the right thing." This is something I genuinely try to remember whenever I debate with anyone, especially feminists. For the most part, I think people genuinely want what's best for others and think that what they're advocating for will be the most beneficial to the world. And in it's own way, that is commenda…
/r/MensRights26/06/16 10:54 AM
1

It doesn't really assume all boys are gonna be a rapist, it just considers that any boy could be a rapist But it does not "consider" that any woman could be a rapist? Despite the fact that some women can and do rape? Do you see how sexist that is? Again, I'll use this as an example; "We need to teach black people not to steal. I'm not saying that all black people are thieves, I'm just considering the possibility that any of them could turn out to be thieves." Just google "whats wrong with rape" …
/r/MensRights25/06/16 07:57 AM
1

Where are you? In most western countries you can legally consent whilst you're drunk. So why not make this a general argument rather than hiding behind one obscure law in your country.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 07:43 AM
9

No one here disagrees with the idea that people should be taught not to rape. Of course everyone should know that! Rape is a hideous crime and we should do all we can to stop it. What we do have issues with is "teach men not to rape" and here are a few things I personally see wrong with that statement (in no particular order); Women can rape as well. Regardless of what figures you go on, some women rape too. A sizeable enough amount to justify including them in the "reeducation"...so why not jus…
/r/MensRights24/06/16 10:25 AM
3

If a drunk person walked up to me in the street and said "Here's £100!", and I took it...would that be considered stealing? No. Certainly not under the law here. Perhaps you could debate the morality of the issue, and certainly the more intoxicated a person becomes, the muddier the waters become. Ultimately, we're all responsible for our own actions when we're drunk.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 10:02 AM
7

Has anyone here NOT been banned from r/feminism? They basically full on admit in their sidebar that they don't accept dissenting opinions.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 03:03 PM
2

I agree, I was just making a light-hearted comment about the absurdity of it. But I reckon if groups of obviously heterosexual cis-gendered white men showed up and just said "I'm bi!" or "I'm non-binary." then the feminists would have no argument against it.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 10:11 AM
7

This is actually one of the best documentaries I've ever seen, for anyone who hasn't watched it, I would strongly recommend it. Be prepared for the feels.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 10:24 AM
2

Do you have a source for that? Not saying that I don't believe you, I just haven't seen stats on it and can't find them broken down by demographic.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 08:42 AM
23

As a gay guy, who doesn't really "present as gay" (whatever that means). I think straight guys should just play these idiots at their own game and say that they're "bisexual" or "non-binary", because ultimately they have no way of making you prove how you define your sexuality or gender...and doing so would be oppressive (by their own standards!). I also wonder if Jewish or Muslim would guarantee you a spot on here? Because these people really love to conflate religion and ethnicity.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 08:34 AM
1

And that's why we're not feminists!
/r/MensRights08/06/16 12:47 PM
2

Haha. Touche! But we cant tear apart their vacuous and arbitrary standards whilst simultaneously using them for our own benefit!
/r/MensRights08/06/16 12:40 PM
1

I found this interesting in the methodology; Gold standard methods to estimate the prevalence of any form of violence are obtained by asking respondents direct questions about their experience of specific acts of violence over a defined period of time, rather than using more generic questions about whether the respondent has been “abused” or has experienced “domestic violence” or “rape” or “sexual abuse”, which tends to yield less disclosure. Whilst I'm not trying to say this method is better or…
/r/MensRights08/06/16 12:25 PM
2

"is itself an act of sexual violence." Let's not do what feminist do and completely dilute terms like "sexual violence" or "rape" etc. It's a gross act of omission, it demonstrates a callous lack of concern for men's health, it perpetuates the notion that men don't experience sexual violence, and it's another sign of how far certain feminist organisations have managed to push their agenda. It is not, however, an act of sexual violence.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 12:06 PM
1

She, also has a career I helped her obtain ;D That weird winky face suggests you're her pimp or something?
/r/MensRights01/06/16 02:38 PM
2

I'm not trying to start an argument with you, but I've watched a lot of Sarah Silverman videos etc. and I always knew that she leaned a bit on the feminist side, but I've never thought she was so extreme. I've never particularly found her jokes to be aggressive towards men and I really like her humour. Even this article, I take it that she's just making a ridiculous comparison between abortion and masturbatory emissions. I don't find it misandric. Would you be able to give me some reasons why yo…
/r/MensRights01/06/16 08:57 AM
3

Preach.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 11:31 PM
1

I agree. People like to look at other attractive people. -faps furiously over Kit Harington photos-
/r/MensRights31/05/16 05:46 PM
7

This one time, when I was a liberal arts student as SFSU, I was handing out leaflets on campus when I spotted a fire-breather coming out of a Circus Skills Lecture. Feeling triggered, I hysterically ran up to him, screamed at him that he was appropriating muh dragon's culture, and assaulted him. Taught that micro-aggressive, misogynist dick a lesson. True story.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 01:59 PM
3

Yeah he definitely did say it. I think in ways he's misguided when he calls it 'sexist' though. Attractive men and women are asked to strip for these things and are, as the feminists would say, 'objectified'. Where he might have a point though is that we respect women when they say they're more than just a body/pretty face, whereas we might see men as being whiny or over-sensitive. I'm not quite sure if that's true either, but it raises an interesting discussion.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 01:50 PM
2

You obviously failed to read my trigger war....ermm, I mean spoiler alert.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 01:45 PM
1

I think that's true to an extent, but I'd say it's probably more complex than that. I'll add two caveats; I think those ideas need to be espoused by people close to you. When I was a feminist, I always knew there were more extreme ideas out there in the feminist community, but they weren't real feminists. They were a misguided minority who didn't represent me at all. And I think the reason for that is because I could disassociate myself with those arguments. It's harder to disassociate yourself …
/r/MensRights31/05/16 01:42 PM
11

They probably believe that literal dragons exist somewhere in the world as well. That comment is a micro-aggression against dragons and dragon-culture. Shame on you, you patriarchal, misogynist-pig! #DragonLivesMatter
/r/MensRights31/05/16 01:22 PM
4

--Minor Spoiler Alert-- Basically at the end of season 5 there was a cliff hanger in which you're lead to believe that his character, Jon Snow dies. I actually haven't watched the new series yet, but obviously he didn't die (or died and was brought back to life). I can only assume that the article is a spoof, because I imagine that Kit Harington (along with all other GoT stars!) are contractually obliged to maintain the secret of what happens later in the series.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 01:18 PM
45

After lying about Jon Snow’s fate for the entire interim between seasons five and six of Game of Thrones, actor Kit Harington finally came out of the liars’ closet with the fan favorite’s triumphant return from the dead. Despite the blatant breach of trust, however, fans have altogether forgiven Harington. That's without a doubt my favourite part of this entirely ridiculous article. They actually try to bring his character into question by making him seem like a liar because he didn't spoil the …
/r/MensRights31/05/16 12:55 PM
3

Thank you. I don't know how effective a 'cult deprogramming' website would be. When you have unquestioningly accepted these feminist dogmas your mind will perform the most intricate and complex mental gymnastics in order to make contradictory evidence somehow support your own argument. I saw it in action just the other night when I told one of my feminist friends that women outperform boys at every level of education, and are the majority at university, and she somehow saw that as even greater e…
/r/MensRights31/05/16 12:07 PM
6

Very well written article. As someone who used to be an ardent feminist, I can really vouch for this cult like attitude. In their minds, whether they are cognizant of it or not, they have devoted too much to their faith, they are hopelessly bound to it, and they no longer have the mental (or emotional) fortitude to relinquish it. Being a feminist was a huge part of my identity. It was a given fact that women were oppressed. Evidence to the contrary must be either biased, incorrect or outright fa…
/r/MensRights31/05/16 10:24 AM
23

Yawn. No one is making a comparison here between MGM and FGM apart from you. I refuse to go down the route of comparison because it's neither productive nor relevant to the central point which is that genital mutilation is bad, regardless of who the victim is. If a grown adult wants circumcision for any reason, be it medical or religious, then let him make that decision, but in the meantime, we need to stop mutilating the genitals of boys. No "phasing out". Just stopped altogether.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 11:25 AM
32

Circumcision is, by definition, mutilation. It's not really debatable.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 09:52 AM
2

I live in Glasgow, mate.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 10:34 PM
2

I doubt it...if references weren't explicitly needed for the exam answer, then I don't expect they'd need to see them. "Neither gender enjoys overwhelming advantages across the board against the other" I think that's a good way to get into a discussion about the nuance of the situation. It's not really my field of study, but you could also examine different indices which have been developed to try and quantify inequality. I know there's the Gender Inequality Index, but that's deeply flawed becau…
/r/MensRights26/05/16 07:10 PM
16

Especially at college level, your opinion should never be rendered invalid or incorrect simply on the basis of your lecturer's bias. If you can make a case for something through accurate referencing and logical argument, then it should be seen as valid. If your lecturer disagrees then she should be able to provide you with contradictory evidence. "all in all, both genders experience their own advantages and disadvantages, and so it can be said that they are, in general, equal." Whilst it might b…
/r/MensRights26/05/16 02:58 PM
7

It's basically an arbitrary definition which benefits a particular political agenda. I can't look for sources at the moment because I'm at work (maybe someone else can help me out?), but I'm pretty sure I've seen evidence that men are the target of most online abuse/threats. But for some reason, instead of saying "we need to tackle online abuse" it becomes about tackling "racist and misogynistic abuse". Jess Philips is the Labour MP who laughed when Philip Davies proposed a debate for men's issu…
/r/MensRights26/05/16 02:00 PM
2

r/mensrights should be the moral, ethical and intellectual triumph of social movements. Who decides on these morals/ethics? The one things I've simultaneously loved and found most difficult to deal with since becoming more aware of the MRM is the disparity of beliefs people hold. There are literally people from all different parts of the political spectrum coming together to discuss men's issues. I love this because it forces me to actually debate each and every issue, rather than just subconsci…
/r/MensRights26/05/16 08:35 AM
2

To be honest buddy, it seems like you really don't understand what it means to be 'transgender'. See, there's this condition called 'gender dysphoria' which is diagnosed by physicians and psychologists where people do not identify with the gender they were born as. This isn't some faux condition made up by SJW's to give themselves a new notch in the belt of special-snowflakery, it's a genuine medical condition. There are various ways of treating this condition, but as far as I'm aware one of the…
/r/MensRights25/05/16 10:37 AM
5

Honestly, by identifying as a feminist, I’m often blamed for everything. Even things that are beyond my control. LOL! Try being a white male. Luckily I'm gay, so I do manage to win some points in the feminist's favourite game; oppression olympics. But if you're a straight white male in western society today you're blamed for the patriarchy, systemic sexism, systemic racism, heteronormativity, systemic homophobia. Any woman that is raped, any racial minority that is discriminated against or kille…
/r/MensRights25/05/16 09:00 AM
2

I'm sorry, I actually have no idea what you're saying. To a point where I think you might have actually replied to the wrong comment?
/r/MensRights24/05/16 08:13 PM
3

webelievesurvivors And you're not allowed to question it because if you do then you're the cause of rape culture!! /s
/r/MensRights22/05/16 12:59 PM
2

As a high schooler, I honestly couldn’t care less which bathroom somebody uses if they’re using whichever one matches their gender identification. I believe that the whole freakout on this issue is a ploy to distract people from the real issues that face us, like childhood poverty, undue corporate influence in politics and income inequality. This guy speaks the truth!
/r/MensRights20/05/16 07:42 AM
3

This is a question I've been pondering a lot recently...I'm a recent convert from the feminist bullshit school of 'gender-as-social-construct' blah blah blah. As such, I'm now trying to establish what I see as masculinity. For me one of the most striking examples of masculinity was Atticus Finch from To Kill a Mockingbird. I remember when I read that book in my mid-teens I felt that I could really look up to him. Him being the image of a man who has a sense of right and wrong, who stands by his …
/r/MensRights19/05/16 09:46 AM
2

so who really cares what females want from males. Just say no. The OP never once mentioned women's perception of masculinity, it was you who chose to look at it through that lens. Why can't men individually define masculinity and manhood by itself, without having to set it up in comparison to femininity? I'm reminded of something Toni Morrison said about how she wanted to be able to write about black people and give them identities which didn't rely on a comparison to how they were different fro…
/r/MensRights19/05/16 09:36 AM
2

So the Scottish Government are partnered up with Year of the Dad, and they had a conference in Glasgow a couple of weeks ago regarding men's issues and the inclusion of fathers in their child's lives (and the services surrounding the lives of children such as education and health etc.). The event wasn't perfect by any means, but they had a lot of really interesting speakers there from Social Work academics to policy writers. They had a great speaker on mental health issues, Jonny Benjamin, who h…
/r/MensRights19/05/16 07:28 AM
7

I would say so. As a gay guy who gets on very easily with a lot of women (I'm definitely not effeminate but also definitely not traditionally masculine), I think there's this notion that effeminate guys pose less of a threat in terms of trying to get in their pants...as such they let their guard down on that front and treat us like people as opposed to predators.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 07:21 PM
2

Did I just walk into r/TheRedPill there?
/r/MensRights18/05/16 07:18 PM
5

No, it doesn't change that. But she cannot be held solely responsible for that. If she's doing all she can to make up for her past beliefs and actions, then that's the most you can ask for.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 12:31 PM
8

You're completely right, and the comparisons between feminism and religion don't end there. The original sin in feminism is that we are born male. I watched the Q&A with Janice Fiamengo at UoO and saw all these guys starting their question by "checking their privilege". It's interesting that none of the white, able-bodied, heterosexual, cis-gendered women did this. And that's what feminism does, it tells us that we're all born into sin (manhood) and we need to apologise for it forever.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 12:29 PM
3

I think that's a little unfair. You can't say that simply because someone got something wrong once then they're always going to get it wrong. She's apologised, she now seems to be helping the men's rights cause, and she's speaking out against feminism...what else can she do?
/r/MensRights18/05/16 12:13 PM
10

Likewise. Only recently have I gone from being "meh, I was a feminist but I don't know how I feel now" to fully identifying as anti-feminist. I'm actually finding this is causing some amount of friction in the relationships I have with close friends.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 11:28 AM
40

This was actually a really lovely read. "described men living in a tribal situation as the hunters and musicians, the inventors and the crafters, the even tempered conspirers of fun with the children." There's something about that notion of masculinity which resonates so much with me. As a guy who also used to heavily identify as a feminist, it seems patently clear to me now that rather than seeing men as being playful, boisterous, mischievous, creative, protective etc., we're taught to view our…
/r/MensRights18/05/16 08:34 AM
6

Did you read the open letter on Facebook? I know that society seems to have an issue when a woman asks for help. Women are supposed to be superheroes. We're supposed to do it all and we're supposed to smile and make it look easy. We're supposed to be perfect mothers, wives, friends, employees and citizens, and we're not supposed to admit that we can't do it without a little help. lolwut? It might come as a shock to that person that men are expected to be fathers, husbands, friends, employees and…
/r/MensRights16/05/16 12:51 PM
9

"If we want to close the pay gap and make a difference, it is the road to the top jobs that needs to be the focus. This is the pay gap problem.” Why!? Surely there needs to be evidence that women face discrimination on "the road to the top jobs" for us to try and rectify it.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 08:15 AM
2

They actually have this in the UK. There's a minimum amount of time women need to take off for health reasons, and I think guys get something like 2 weeks statutory paternity leave. But after that, the woman can choose to return to work and the guy can take her leave for himself. I haven't seen any definite figures on how many people opt to do this, but it doesn't seem particularly common (to a point where a lot of people don't even know about it).
/r/MensRights12/05/16 08:11 AM
4

I have to admit, I don't love Milo. I just wanted to add that I'm someone who very much considers himself to be on the left, and I think that SJW and Feminists are ruining the left. They're what generally gets called 'the regressive left'. People who believe in equality and social justice to a point where they're willing to give up civil liberties such as free-speech, due process, equality before the law etc. It genuinely worries me.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 11:13 AM
2

You seem to be getting argumentative for no reason here, I didn't argue those points or say they were right. I put down examples of what many people regard as being examples of heteronormativity, and I left it to other people to decide what they thought of it. Firstly, no one is conflating probability with normality. We know that the probability is that people will identify as heterosexual. What people do argue however is that making the assumption is not helpful when you can just as easily not …
/r/MensRights06/05/16 10:56 AM
2

Alas, I think you may be misunderstanding the term heteronormativity. Heteronormativity, at it's most basic level, is a societal assumption that heterosexuality is the normal/natural sexuality for everyone, or in some instance that it is the only sexuality. Let me preface what I'm about to say by telling you that like all schisms and isms, people have varying opinions on what counts as heteronormative and what doesn't...so these are just some of my thoughts. Assuming that your children are heter…
/r/MensRights05/05/16 05:30 PM
2

Can I ask where you're based? I'm a gay guy and I've never encountered any hetero guys getting shit for their sexuality "in the community". In what community? The wider community? I'll try to stay open minded about it, but I really haven't seen much evidence of the heterosexual community suffering at the hand of the gay community. Could you provide more information? Also, with regards to being "born this way", all I can really say is that realising you're gay and coming out has historically not …
/r/MensRights05/05/16 12:33 PM
1

Exactly. I often wonder why this never goes the other way...when feminists complain about there not being enough female heads of state or CEOs of companies, no one ever says to them "you just need to think and act more like men. Simple."
/r/MensRights05/05/16 12:06 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter